Pre-operative denosumab is associated with higher risk of local recurrence in giant cell tumor of bone: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Outcomes of Curettage versus Surgical Resection of Giant Cell Tumor of the Distal Radius - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective  Surgical procedures of curettage and surgical resection are used to treat giant cell tumor (GCT) of the distal radius, but it is still controversial whether one provides better functional outcomes than the other. The present study aims to determine and compare both procedures regarding complications, local recurrence, and mobility. Methods  A complete search of the applicable literature was done and independently assessed by three authors. Included studies reported on patients who were surgically treated for GCT of the distal radius with either curettage or surgical resection. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was used to obtain research regarding outcomes of surgical resection and curettage for GCT of the distal radius. A meta-analysis was performed using this data. Quality assessment was performed. Results  Seven studies, comprising 114 patients with resection and 108 with curettage, totaling 222 subjects with 117 males and 105 females, were included in the present review. Overall, patients in the curettage group had a higher recurrence rate (0.205; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 0.057-0.735; p  = 0.015). Incidences in complications remains the same in both groups (2.845; 95%CI = 0.644-12.57; p  = 0.168). Incidences in functional outcomes were the same in both groups as well (-0.948; 95%CI = -2.074-0.178; p  = 0.099). Conclusion  The authors prefer resection and reconstruction for GCT of distal radius as optimum treatment method due to the similar functional outcomes and lower chances of recurrence. Curettage might be a treatment option in low-grade GCT coupled with adjuvant, neoadjuvant or ablation to reduce the risk of recurrence.

Management of a rare mandibular giant cell tumor of bone by neoadjuvant denosumab therapy and surgery: A 4-year follow-up case report

INTRODUCTION

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a very rare tumor encountered in the jaws and its histology is quite similar to the more common giant cell granuloma of the jaws (GCGJ). These two entities can be easily confused in maxillofacial region. They are classically managed surgically, but in some localizations and in specific medical-surgical contexts, neoadjuvant therapy with denosumab may be indicated. This report tends to reinforce existing evidence in favor of the use of a neoadjuvant approach, particularly for localization of GCTB in the orofacial region.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

This is a 57-year-old female patient, an alcoholic smoker, in whom a voluminous mandibular radiolucent lesion was discovered during a routine X-ray by her dentist. After medical imaging assessment and incisional biopsy, diagnosis of GCTB was established. A neoadjuvant denosumab therapy was proposed first followed by a secondary surgical curettage. After 4 years' follow-up, complete healing was observed with no recurrence of the lesion.

DISCUSSION

Surgical management of aggressive GCTB is risky particularly in localizations involving the sacrum, spine or craniofacial skeleton with a high residual recurrence rate. The use of denosumab to stop tumor progression and facilitate secondary excision surgery is a recent approach that is now well documented in the literature showing promising results with a low rate of side effects.

CONCLUSION

This case of mandibular GCTB is to our knowledge the unique case described in this localization and treated by denosumab neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery with a 4-year follow-up showing a complete healing.

Proximal Tibia Tumour Location and Curettage Are Major Risk Factors of Local Recurrence in Giant Cell Tumour of Bone

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is one of the most common local aggressive tumourous lesions with a wide variety of biological behaviour. However, there are no clear indicative criteria when choosing the type of procedure and the complication rates remain high, especially in terms of local recurrence. The purpose of the study was to (1) identify the main risk factors for local recurrence, (2) evaluate the recurrence-free survival in dependence on neoadjuvant denosumab use and the type of procedure, and (3) compare the functional outcomes after curettage and en bloc resection. The group included 102 patients with GCTB treated between 2006 and 2020. The mean age of patients was 34.4 years (15-79). The follow-up period was 8.32 years (2-16) on average. Local recurrence occurred in 14 patients (29.8%) who underwent curettage and in 5 patients (10.6%) after en bloc resection. Curettage was shown to be a factor in increasing recurrence rates (OR = 3.64 [95% CI: 1.19-11.15]; p = 0.023). Tibial location was an independent risk factor for local recurrence regardless of the type of surgery (OR = 3.22 [95% CI: 1.09-9.48]; p = 0.026). The recurrence-free survival rate of patients treated with resection and denosumab was higher compared to other treatments at five years postoperatively (p = 0.0307). Functional ability and pain as reported by patients at the latest follow-up were superior after curettage compared to resection for upper and lower extremity (mean difference: -4.00 [95% CI: -6.81 to -1.18]; p < 0.001 and mean difference: -5.36 [95% CI: -3.74 to -6.97]; p < 0.001, respectively). Proximal tibia tumour location and curettage were shown to be major risk factors for local recurrence in GCTB regardless of neoadjuvant denosumab treatment. The recurrence-free survival rate of patients treated with resection and denosumab was higher compared to other treatments. The functional outcome of patients after curettage was better compared to en bloc resection.

Current therapies and future prospective for locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors

Locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of soft tissue and bone tumors with intermediate histology, incompletely understood biology, and highly variable natural history. Despite having a limited to absent ability to metastasize and excellent survival prognosis, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors can be symptomatic, require prolonged and repeat treatments including surgery and chemotherapy, and can severely impact patients' quality of life. The management of locally aggressive tumors has evolved over the years with a focus on minimizing morbid treatments. Extensive oncologic surgeries and radiation are pillars of care for high grade sarcomas, however, play a more limited role in management of locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors, due to propensity for local recurrence despite resection, and the risk of transformation to a higher-grade entity following radiation. Patients should ideally be evaluated in specialized sarcoma centers that can coordinate complex multimodal decision-making, taking into consideration the individual patient's clinical presentation and history, as well as any available prognostic factors into customizing therapy. In this review, we aim to discuss the biology, clinical management, and future treatment frontiers for three representative locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors: desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF), tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) and giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). These entities challenge clinicians with their unpredictable behavior and responses to treatment, and still lack a well-defined standard of care despite recent progress with newly approved or promising experimental drugs.

Denosumab treatment for progressive Enneking stage II cervical giant-cell tumor conservatively

Cervical giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is a rare, primary benign bone tumor in pediatric patients. Surgery remains the primary choice for treating resectable cervical GCTB. Additional adjuvant therapeutic options are available for patients with unresectable cervical GCTB, including the anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody, denosumab. We represented a case incidentally found in a 7-year-old female, who complained severe craniocervical pain, grade 2-3 dysphagia, dysphonia, hypesthesia, and extremity weakness. The patient showed an impressive clinical response to denosumab, both clinically and radiologically, without adverse events or recurrence. To date, this is the youngest patient ever reported to have a progressive Enneking stage II C3 GCTB treated with denosumab alone. Denosumab can be administered as a single and conservative therapy for pediatric patients with unresectable upper cervical GCTB, avoiding the risks and morbidity of surgical and radiative treatment.

Progress on Denosumab Use in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Dose and Duration of Therapy

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an aggressive non-cancerous bone tumor associated with risks of sarcoma and metastasis. Once malignancy occurs, the prognosis is generally poor. Surgery remains the main treatment for GCTB. Multidisciplinary management is a feasible option for patients wherein surgical resection is not an option or for those with serious surgery-related complications. Denosumab is an anti-nuclear factor kappa B ligand approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, bone metastases, and advanced or inoperable GCTB. However, the guidelines for treating GCTB are unclear; its short-term efficacy and safety in inoperable patients have been demonstrated. Lengthier therapies (high cumulative doses) or pre-operative adjuvant therapy may be associated with severe complications and high local recurrence rates. Short-term administration helps attain satisfactory local control and functionality. As a result, lately, the impact of different doses and lengths of treatment on the efficacy of denosumab in GCTB treatment, the incidence of complications, and recurrence rates have gained attention. The efficacy and safety of denosumab against GCTB, its impact on imaging assessment, related complications, and recurrence of GCTB were previously reviewed. For further research direction, this paper reviews the progress of studies evaluating the impact of the dose and duration of denosumab therapy for GCTB.

Prognostic Value and Quantitative CT Analysis in RANKL Expression of Spinal GCTB in the Denosumab Era: A Machine Learning Approach

The receptor activator of the nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) is the therapeutic target of denosumab. In this study, we evaluated whether radiomics signature and machine learning analysis can predict RANKL status in spinal giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB). This retrospective study consisted of 107 patients, including a training set (n = 82) and a validation set (n = 25). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to validate the prognostic value of RANKL status. Radiomic feature extraction of three heterogeneous regions (VOIentire, VOIedge, and VOIcore) from pretreatment CT were performed. Followed by feature selection using Selected K Best and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis, three classifiers (random forest (RF), support vector machine, and logistic regression) were used to build models. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, F1 score, recall, precision, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the models' performance. Classification of 75 patients with eligible follow-up based on RANKL status resulted in a significant difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.035). VOIcore-based RF classifier performs best. Using this model, the AUCs for the training and validation cohorts were 0.880 and 0.766, respectively. In conclusion, a machine learning approach based on CT radiomic features could discriminate prognostically significant RANKL status in spinal GCTB, which may ultimately aid clinical decision-making.

The Effect of Denosumab and Risk Factors for Recurrence in Spinal Giant Cell Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) are common benign primary bone tumors and are well known for their locally aggressive performance and tendency to recur. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of denosumab and risk factors for recurrent spinal GCTs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify differences between individuals treated with and without denosumab and risk factors for spinal GCT recurrence. Patient data, including age, sex, tumor resection range, location, denosumab use, Campanacci grade, and radiotherapy, were documented. Comparable factors were evaluated using odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included. The overall incidence of spinal GCT recurrence was 29%. Campanacci grade III tumors showed better recurrence outcomes than grades I and II (OR, 16.36; 95% CI, 4.19-63.93; p<0.001). Gross total resection (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.04-0.19; p<0.001), radiotherapy (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.65; p=0.004), and the use of denosumab during subtotal resection (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.07-8.17; p=0.04) were important factors for reducing recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians must consider the effects of gross total resection, radiotherapy use, and denosumab use in cases of subtotal resection during spinal GCT treatment. So far, many researchers have used denosumab in spinal GCT, but none have clearly suggested an endpoint. Most studies, however, recommend using it for more than 6 months.

The Activation of PDGFRβ on Mononuclear Stromal/Tumor Cells in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone After Denosumab Treatment. An Immunohistochemical Study of Five Cases

Due to the relatively high recurrence rate and the destructive nature of the tumor, the treatment of giant cell tumor is still a challenge. Denosumab appeared to be a promising candidate as a therapeutic drug. However, several studies have reported that tumors can recur during/after treatment with denosumab. Based on activated receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pattern of the stromal/tumor cells, a combination treatment with denosumab and sunitinib has recently been proposed to inhibit recurrences. This prompted us to investigate the PDGFRβ expression of five denosumab treated cases using both primary and recurrent tumors during and after denosumab treatment. In addition, to recognise morphological changes, immunohistochemical analysis of H3F3A and PDGFRβ was also performed. As an effect of denosumab treatment, the permanent absence of giant cells associated with severe to mild fibrosis was the most consistent morphological change, but H3F3A positive stromal/tumor cells were observed in all cases. Furthermore, an increased immunopositivity of PDGFRβ in stromal/tumor cells was evident in all recurrent cases during denosumab treatment. Upon tumor recurrence (after the discontinuation of denosumab treatment) the intensity of PDGFRβ immunostaining in stromal/tumor cells was restored/decreased. Our results confirm (for the first time) the activation of PDGFRβ on mononuclear stromal/tumor cells at protein level as an effect of denosumab treatment, which has so far only been demonstrated by phosphoprotein array analysis (protein lysates). The decreased PDGFRβ activity after the discontinuation of denosumab treatmeant and the increased PDGFRβ activity during denosumab treatment underlines the need for denosumab and sunitinib combination therapy.

Updated concepts in treatment of giant cell tumor of bone

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) are intermediate, locally aggressive primary bone tumors. For conventional GCTB, surgery remains treatment of choice. For advanced GCTB, a more important role came into play for systemic therapy including denosumab and bisphosphonates over the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

In diagnostics, focus has been on H3F3A (G34) driver mutations present in GCTB. The most frequent mutation (G34W) can be detected using immunohistochemistry and is highly specific in differentiating GCTB from other giant cell containing tumors. PD-L1 expression can be used as biological marker to predict higher recurrence risks in GCTB patients.The use of bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement is under investigation in a randomized controlled trial. A new technique consisting of percutaneous microwave ablation and bisphosphonate-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cementoplasty was proposed for unresectable (pelvic) GCTB.Increased experience with use of denosumab raised concern on elevated recurrence rates. However, conclusions of meta-analyses should be interpreted with risk of indication bias in mind. Several small studies are published with short-course denosumab (varying from 3 to 6 doses). One small trial directly compared denosumab and zoledronic acid, with no statistical differences in radiological and clinical outcome, and nonsignificantly higher recurrence rate after denosumab. As bisphosphonates directly target neoplastic stromal cells in GCTB, larger directly comparative trials are still warranted.

SUMMARY

Neoadjuvant denosumab is highly effective for advanced GCTB, and a short-course is advised to facilitate surgery, whereas increased recurrence rates remain of concern. Randomized controlled trials are conducted on bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement and on optimal dose and duration of neoadjuvant denosumab. PD-L1 could be a potential new therapy target in GCTB.

Denosumab for central giant cell granuloma in an Australian tertiary paediatric centre

BACKGROUND

Central giant cell granulomas (CGCG) are rare osteolytic, benign but often locally aggressive tumours of bone. Surgical curettage may not be possible in extensive lesions and resection carries high morbidity, especially in growing children, and previous medical therapies have had variable efficacy and high recurrence rates. Interruption of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) signalling holds promise as an effective therapeutic strategy for these tumours.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of our protocol for denosumab treatment of CGCG in children.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 4 patients treated with denosumab using a standardised protocol for CGCG in a tertiary paediatric centre. Denosumab 70 mg/m² was given 4-weekly, followed by 2 doses of zoledronate 0.025 mg/kg, aimed at preventing rebound hypercalcaemia.

RESULTS

Treatment of CGCG resulted in metabolic remission in all patients, but recurrence, detected by positron emission tomography (PET), occurred at 6 months in three patients and 12 months in one patient. Three patients developed symptomatic hypercalcaemia 4-5 months and one patient asymptomatic hypercalcaemia 7 months after cessation of denosumab, with 3 requiring additional bisphosphonate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab produced a radiological and metabolic response in our patients, but metabolic recurrence occurred in all patients. PET imaging was effective for monitoring treatment response and early detection of recurrence. Incidence of rebound hypercalcaemia in this paediatric cohort was high. We present proposed changes to our protocol with the aim of producing sustained remission and preventing rebound hypercalcaemia.

Current management of giant-cell tumor of bone in the denosumab era

Giant-cell tumor of bone is a rare, locally aggressive and rarely metastasizing primary bone tumor. The mainstay of treatment remains controversial and is decided by the balance between adequate surgical margin and sufficient adjacent joint function. Although curettage with a high-speed burr and local adjuvants can maintain normal joint function, many reports have revealed a high local recurrence rate. Conversely, en bloc resection and reconstruction with prostheses for highly aggressive lesions have reportedly lower local recurrence rates and poorer functional outcomes. Denosumab-a full human monoclonal antibody that inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa β ligand-was approved by the Food and Drug Authority in 2013 for use in surgically unresectable or when resection is likely to result in severe morbidity for skeletally mature adolescents and adults with giant-cell tumor of bone. However, subsequent studies have suggested that the local recurrence rate would be increased by preoperative use of denosumab. In systematic reviews of the local recurrence rate after preoperative use of denosumab, conclusions vary due to the small sample sizes of the studies reviewed. Therefore, controversy regarding the treatment of giant-cell tumor of bone is ongoing. Here, this review elucidates the management of giant-cell tumor of bone, especially with the local adjuvant and neoadjuvant use of denosumab, and presents the current, evidence-based treatment for giant-cell tumor of bone.

Study of imaging changes following preoperative denosumab for giant cell tumor of bone

•

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply.

•

The decrease of blood supply was the most significant in the initial stage of treatment.

•

It is not recommended to apply denosumab long before surgical treatment.

Background

The changes in the characteristics of the tumor blood supply of giant cell tumor of bone over time after treatment with denosumab remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in the blood supply imaging characteristics of giant cell tumor of bone after preoperative denosumab treatment and to provide evidence for evaluating the reasonable time for preoperative treatment.

Methods

A total of 59 patients with giant cell tumor of bone who were treated in our hospital from 2014 to 2019 were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent enhanced CT examination of the tumor site before denosumab treatment and every month after treatment. The plain CT value and enhanced CT value of the tumor were measured, and the CT enhancement rate of the tumor was calculated. The change in the CT enhancement rate of the tumor over time after denosumab treatment was analyzed.

Results

The average tumor enhancement rates were 2.14 (1.22–4.05), 1.60 (1.12–2.53), 1.38 (1.02–2.24), and 1.25 (1–2.11) before denosumab treatment and one month, three months, and six months after treatment, respectively. After denosumab treatment, the average monthly CT enhancement rate decreased as follows: 0.54 (25.2%) in the first month, 0.11 (5.15%) in the second to third months, and 0.04 (1.87%) in the fourth to sixth months. The tumor enhancement rate was no longer significantly reduced three months post-treatment. There was a significant correlation between the reduction in the CT enhancement rate and the initial CT enhancement rate (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply. The decrease in the blood supply is the most significant in the initial stage of treatment. Following treatment, the decrease in the blood supply gradually reduces over time. Therefore, for the purpose of reducing intra-operative bleeding and facilitating surgery, application of denosumab treatment is not recommended more than three months before surgery.

Giant cell tumour of hand bones: outcomes of treatment

The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of giant cell tumour of the hand bones in an Asian population, document treatment options and report outcomes of treatment. Of 698 giant cell tumours of bone that underwent surgery between January 2011 and December 2020 at our institute, only 22 (3%) were in the hand. Fourteen occurred in the metacarpals, eight in the phalanges. Fifteen were primary tumours and seven had recurrent disease. Twenty lesions had an associated soft tissue component. Two patients treated for primary disease and one who had been treated for recurrence had local recurrence. Recurrence occurred in two of nine patients treated with curettage, one of three with resection and none of five with ray or digit amputation. Both curettage and resection/amputation are acceptable treatment options for the rare condition of giant cell tumour of bone in the hand, with a need to individualize treatment decisions based on the site and extent of disease to minimize treatment morbidity while maximizing disease control.Level of evidence: IV.

Tumor microenvironment in giant cell tumor of bone: evaluation of PD-L1 expression and SIRPα infiltration after denosumab treatment

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an intermediate malignant bone tumor that is locally aggressive and rarely metastasizes. Denosumab, which is a receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) inhibitor, can be used to treat GCTB. We focused on potential immunotherapy for GCTB and investigated the tumor microenvironment of GCTB. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) expression and signal-regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα), forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) infiltration were assessed by immunohistochemical studies of 137 tumor tissues from 96 patients. Of the naive primary specimens, 28% exhibited PD-L1 expression and 39% exhibited IDO1 expression. There was significantly more SIRPα⁺, FOXP3⁺, and CD8⁺ cell infiltration in PD-L1- and IDO1-positive tumors than in PD-L1- and IDO1-negative tumors. The frequency of PD-L1 expression and SIRPα⁺ cell infiltration in recurrent lesions treated with denosumab was significantly higher than in primary lesions and recurrent lesions not treated with denosumab. PD-L1 expression and higher SIRPα⁺ cell infiltration were significantly correlated with shorter recurrence-free survival. PD-L1 and SIRPα immune checkpoint inhibitors may provide clinical benefit in GCTB patients with recurrent lesions after denosumab therapy.

Metachronous multicentric giant cell tumour of bone in a 12-year-old girl: A case report and review of literature

While giant cell tumour of bone is a relatively common tumour in adults, it is exceedingly rare in children. Multicentric metachronous giant cell tumour is an even rarer presentation of this tumour in skeletally immature patients. We present here the challenges in management of this rare tumour.

A 12-year-old girl presented with a giant cell tumour affecting four different bones sequentially, three times within a 3-year period. The disease first appeared in the right distal fibula, then a year later in ipsilateral talus and calcaneus and finally a year later, in the T5 vertebral body, all requiring surgical treatment. Our strategy was to manage this lesion aggressively based on the limited literature available and present our own long-term surveillance strategy. Our patient responded well to treatment each time and has remained disease-free for 24 months from her last surgery.

This is a rare case of metachronous multicentric giant cell tumour of bone in a skeletally immature patient requiring aggressive treatment and surveillance.

Role of denosumab before resection and reconstruction in giant cell tumors of bone: a single-centered retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Denosumab has been approved by Food and Drug Authority in 2013 for use in surgically unresectable Giant cell tumor (GCT) to achieve resectable tumor margins. The aim of this study is to investigate the functional outcome and surgical convenience with the use of neoadjuvant denosumab before resection and reconstruction in Campanacci grade III GCT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 70 cases of Campanacci grade III GCT receiving resection and reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2019. They were stratified into two groups: one group of 29 patients received once-weekly denosumab 120 mg for 4-weeks before resection and reconstruction, while the other group of 41 patients did not receive denosumab before resection and reconstruction. Quality of life by musculoskeletal tumor society score where 0-7 means poor, 8-14 means fair, 15-22 means good; above 22 means excellent, incidence of tumor recurrence, intraoperative duration in minutes and postoperative positive margins were assessed for each cohort after 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in musculoskeletal tumor society score (25.75 vs. 27.41; P  = 0.178), incidence of recurrence (3.45% vs. 4.88%; P  < 0.001), and postoperative positive margins (10.34% vs. 4.88%; P  = 0.38) for both groups. However, the intraoperative duration (133.38 vs. 194.49; P  < 0.001) was significantly higher in the non-denosumab group compared with denosumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant denosumab is equally effective considering postoperative functional outcomes and surgical convenience except intraoperative duration where it is highly helpful in saving the operating time duration. Easier identification, resection and lesser reconstruction are the key surgical convenience offered by neoadjuvant denosumab.

The use of denosumab in the setting of acute pathological fracture through giant cell tumour of bone

Background

Denosumab (Xgeva^TM) is a fully human antibody to RANK-Ligand, an important signal mediator in the pathogenesis of giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). The use of denosumab in the treatment of GCTB has changed the way in which these tumours are managed over the past years.

Case presentation

Described is the case of an acute fracture through a GCTB of the distal radius of a fit and well 32-year-old, non-smoking, female patient following a simple fall onto her outstretched, dominant hand. The aim was to enable joint sparing management for the patient, as opposed to an acute fusion procedure of the carpus. The patient underwent percutaneous k-wire fixation with application of plaster and immediate commencement with denosumab to halt the activity of the GCTB. Bone healing was rapid; plaster and k-wires were removed after 6 weeks. At 6 months denosumab, was ceased and an open curettage and grafting procedure of the tumour bed was undertaken (using MIIG X3, Wright Medical, aqueous calcium sulphate as graft material).

Conclusions

The use of denosumab in the acute setting of pathological fracture through giant cell tumour of bone allowing joint salvage has not been previously described. The treatment was well tolerated and functional outcomes are excellent, with very promising 4-year follow-up.

This novel approach may allow for more joint sparing strategies in the future for other patients in this difficult situation. Further cases will need to be gathered to establish this technique as a suitable treatment pathway.

Immunohistochemical Characterization of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Treated With Denosumab: Support for Osteoblastic Differentiation

Giant cell tumor of bone is a locally aggressive, rarely metastasizing neoplasm. Evidence suggests that the neoplastic cells may be osteoblastic in differentiation. Standard treatment is surgical removal, but medical therapy with denosumab, an inhibitor of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κβ ligand, has become a component of patient management in select cases. Denosumab-treated giant cell tumor of bone (DT-GCTB) shows drastic morphologic changes including the presence of abundant bone. To further determine the relationship of the neoplastic cells to osteoblast phenotype, we performed a morphologic and immunohistochemical study on a series of DT-GCTB. Cases of DT-GCTB were retrieved from surgical pathology files, available slides were reviewed, and immunohistochemistry for H3.3 G34W, SATB2, and p63 was performed. The cohort included 31 tumors from 30 patients (2:3 male:female), ages 15 to 73 years (median=36 y). The morphology of post-denosumab-treated tumors ranged from tumors composed of an abundant bone matrix with few spindle cells to spindle cell-predominant tumors. Five had focal residual classic CGTB, and 2 manifested mild nuclear atypia. The majority expressed all markers: 86.2% for H3.3 G34W, 96.7% for SATB2, and 100% for p63. All markers stained the various tumor components including spindle cells and the cells on the surface of and within the treated tumor bone matrix. Most markers were also positive in reactive-appearing woven bone adjacent to tumor: 84.6% for H3.3 G34W, 100% for SATB2, and 68% for p63. These findings suggest that denosumab treatment of giant cell tumor of bone results in osteoblastic differentiation with bone production.

The impact of curettage technique on local control in giant cell tumour of bone

INTRODUCTION

Although consensus has been reached regarding the main aspects of intralesional surgery for giant cell tumour of the bone (GCTB), debates continue about the most effective combination of local adjuvants. The purpose of study was to analyze the previous experience and determine the most effective curettage approach for GCTB.

METHODS

We summarized the findings from 89 papers published from 1962 to 2020 related to this subject. Database consisted of 137 treated groups that included 6441 patients who underwent different curettage techniques without pre-operative administration of bisphosphonates or RANKL inhibitors.

RESULTS

Recurrence rates after simple curettage ranged between 27 and 82% with a median value at 47%. The use of one or two local adjuvants reduced the incidence of recurrences approximately by 50% when compared with simple curettage. High-speed burring combined with chemical adjuvants or followed by poly(methyl methacrylate) cementation with or without bone grafting further improved the local control leading to good and excellent results; however, these were not documented in all studies. Simultaneous use of burring, chemical adjuvants, and cementation, which we named here as combined curettage, allowed to down local relapses to the range of 0-26%, with a median at 11%. Oncologic outcomes after combined curettage are significantly better when compared with simple curettage (p < 0.0001) and other variants of enhancement (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined curettage appears to provide the most potent and comprehensive impact on residual tumour cells located in risk zones. This approach should be considered for locally advanced tumours when function-preserving surgery is planned. Additional comparative studies are required to define the optimal curettage enhancement for each individual patient.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Current Status and Pitfalls

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). Clinical trials and case series have demonstrated that denosumab is relevant to beneficial tumor response and surgical down-staging in patients of GCTB. However, these trials or case series have limitations with a short follow-up. Recent increasing studies revealed that denosumab probably increased the local recurrence risk in patients treated with curettage. This may be caused by the thicken bone margin of tumor that trapped tumor cells from curettage. The direct bone formation by tumor cells in the margin after denosumab treatment also contributed to the local recurrence. in vitro studies showed denosumab resulted in a cytostatic instead of a true cytotoxic response on neoplastic stromal cells. More importantly, denosumab-treated GCTB exhibited morphologic overlap with malignancy, and a growing number of patients of malignant transformation of GCTB during denosumab treatment have been reported. The optimal duration, long term safety, maintenance dose, and optimum indications remain to be elucidated. With these concerns in mind, this review warns that the denosumab therapy of GCTB should be applied with caution.