Tourniquet use in routine primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with a higher transfusion rate and longer postoperative length of stay: a real-world study

No difference in reoperation rates or aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty with or without a tourniquet

INTRODUCTION

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the reoperation rate among patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without an intraoperative tourniquet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high volume academic orthopaedic center. Eligible patients underwent primary, cemented TKA either with or without the use of a tourniquet throughout the entirety of the care. The causes and timing of reoperations were recorded. Survivorship analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate independent predictors of reoperation.

RESULTS

There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used and 1663 (42%) cases with no tourniquet use. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the no tourniquet group and tourniquet group were 92.2% and 96.5%, respectively. Only younger age was an independent predictor of both all cause revision and aseptic loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusting for confounders, the presence of a tourniquet did not affect the rates of long-term all-cause revision rates or aseptic loosening. Younger patients have a higher risk of all-cause reoperation and reoperation due to aseptic loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparison of total blood loss between limited tourniquet use and conventional tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study examined the differences in total blood loss, the need for blood transfusions, length of hospital stay, wound grading scores, incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and reoperation rates between conventional and limited tourniquet use during unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized controlled trial included 90 patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA. Forty-five patients were allocated to the limited tourniquet use group (LIM-TKA), and 45 to the conventional tourniquet use group (CON-TKA). The study analyzed differences in total blood loss, the need for blood transfusions, wound grading scores, incidence of VTE, length of hospital stay, and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

The mean total blood loss in the LIM-TKA group was 589.55 ± 238.2 ml, significantly lower than the 692.31 ± 276.15 ml observed in the CON-TKA group (P = 0.031). Significantly poorer wound grades were seen in the CON-TKA group compared to the LIM-TKA group, with 23 vs. 34, 15 vs. 11, 5 vs. 0, 1 vs. 0 and 1 vs. 0 patients, respectively, having grade 1, 2 A, 2B, 2 C and 3 A wounds according to the Southampton Scoring System (P = 0.032). Patients in the LIM-TKA group also had a shorter hospital stay versus the CON-TKA group (5.6 ± 1.28 vs. 7.2 ± 4.06 days, P = 0.006). The rates of blood transfusion, VTE complications, and reoperation were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSION

LIM-TKA results in significantly lower total blood loss and improved wound grading scores, as well as a decreased length of hospital stay compared to CON-TKA. LIM-TKA could be a suitable option for surgeons aiming to minimize tourniquet-related adverse outcomes while maintaining a dry bone surface during TKA cementation.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

This study was retrospectively registered at Thai Clinical Trials Registry (thaiclinicaltrials.org) on July 28, 2024.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

TCTR20240728002.

A staged use of tourniquet does not influence the fast-track recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

INTRODUCTION

Upper-tight tourniquet is widely used in Total Knee Arthroplasty in different modalities. However, it has been associated with a negative impact on post-operative muscle strength end pain. This study aimed to investigate the effect of tourniquet on post-operative pain and recovery in enhanced recovery joint surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective randomized study, we included 116 patients undergoing to TKA. Surgery was performed with a staged use of tourniquet in Group A (58 patients) and without tourniquet in Group B. In the former group a low-pressure tourniquet was deflated after bone cuts to allow hemostasis of posterior recess and re-inflated for cementation. For all patients a multimodal fast-track recovery protocol was used. Time to reach rehabilitation milestones was recorded as primary endpoint. Range of motion, pain, hemarthrosis, total blood loss, surgical field visualization, Knee Score (KS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

. No statistically significant differences were found (group B: average 1.3 ± 0.6 day; group A: average 1.2 ± 0.5 day). Group A had a shorter mean surgical time and a clearer surgical field visualization. Group B had a larger estimated blood loss and hemoglobin drop without a statistically significant difference in the transfusion rate. No differences between the groups were seen in the KS, OKS and range of motion (ROM) and post-operative joint swelling. Pain score was similar between cohorts and recorded thigh pain was surprisingly greater in group B.

DISCUSSION

The use of tourniquet in TKA surgery helps to minimize intraoperative blood loss and improves surgical field visualization. Its application with a modern and staged protocol does not affect the functional outcomes (OKS, KSS, ROM) of the early post operative period without compromising the fast-track recovery.

Functional Outcome in Obese Patients Undergoing Image-Based Cruciate Retaining Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Subvastus Approach: A Short-Term Study

Introduction Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease that significantly affects quality of life, especially among obese and morbidly obese individuals. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage OA, but it presents unique challenges in obese patients. The mini-subvastus approach (SA) and robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) are emerging techniques that may address these challenges. This study evaluates the clinical and radiological outcomes of cruciate-retaining (CR) RA-TKA using the mini-subvastus approach in obese and morbidly obese patients. Methods This study included 114 obese patients (215 knees) with primary OA who underwent CR RA-TKA (Maxx Meril CR knee, USA) using the Cuvis Joint® robotic system. Patients had a BMI of ≥30 kg/m² (n=101) and morbid obesity with a BMI ≥40 kg/m² (n=13). Preoperative planning involved CT scans and the J-planner for optimal implant size and positioning. Surgery was performed without tourniquets, and patients were mobilized postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) scores and the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) at three and six months. Results The study included 85 females and 29 males with an average age of 61.8 years. Satisfactory knee exposure was achieved in all cases using SA, with no major complications such as wound infections, deep vein thrombosis, or component misalignment. Intraoperative challenges were managed effectively, including two cases of medial collateral ligament avulsion and one partial patellar tendon avulsion. Postoperative VAS scores showed significant pain reduction from pre-op (6.54) to post-op day 3 (1.3). AKSS improved from a pre-op average of 33.9 to 70.7 at three months and 80.9 at six months. Most patients (80%) achieved exceptional range of motion (ROM) ≥120° at six months. Discussion The mini-subvastus approach in RA-TKA offers several advantages, including reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and improved quadriceps strength, even in obese patients. The use of robotic assistance ensures accurate component positioning and alignment, mitigating the challenges typically associated with obese patients undergoing TKA. Conclusion The study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of CR RA-TKA using the mini-subvastus approach in obese and morbidly obese patients. This technique provides adequate exposure, reduces pain, and promotes early mobilization and recovery with satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. The findings support the potential for wider adoption of this approach in managing knee OA in obese populations, though further studies with longer follow-up are warranted.

Blood-conserving and therapeutic efficacy of intravenous tranexamic acid at different time points after primary total knee arthroplasty with tourniquet application: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The use of a tourniquet in combination with tranexamic acid (TXA) not only ensures clear vision, reduces intraoperative blood loss and shortens operative time but also improves cement-bone inter-digitation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is no proof whether the blood flow blocking effect of tourniquet affects the antifibrinolytic effect of TXA, and the optimal timing of TXA administration is still unclear. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of the first dose of TXA administered intravenously before tourniquet compression and release in TKA on perioperative blood loss and therapeutic efficacy in patients.

METHODS

In this double-blind trial, 90 patients undergoing primary TKA were randomised into 2 groups: Group A, patients received intravenous TXA 10 min before tourniquet compression (20 mg/kg) and 3, 6 and 24 h later (10 mg/kg), and Group B, patients were treated the same as those in Group A but received intravenous TXA before tourniquet release. The primary outcomes were changes in blood loss, haemoglobin and haematocrit. Secondary outcomes included operation and tourniquet times, blood transfusion rate, subcutaneous petechiae and circumferential changes in the operated limb, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, hospital for special surgery (HSS) score, length of stay (LOS) postoperatively, complications and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups with regard to age, sex, weight, body mass index (BMI), Kellgren-Lawrence class, preoperative blood volume, preoperative laboratory values, operation and tourniquet times, transfusion rate, knee circumference, preoperative HSS, or VAS score (P:n.s.). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (IBL) (52.7 ml vs. 63.4 ml, P = 0.07), hidden blood loss (HBL) (91.4 ml vs. 119.9, P = 0.4) or total blood loss (TBL) (144.1 ml vs. 183.3 ml, P = 0.72) between Groups A and B. Haemoglobin, haematocrit and red blood cell count (RBC) dropped to a low point on postoperative day 3 and then rebounded, returning to normal levels on day 21, and the trend of change between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P:n.s.). There was no significant difference in subcutaneous ecchymosis incidence, knee swelling rate, HSS score, VAS score, LOS postoperatively, complication rate or patient satisfaction (P:n.s.).

CONCLUSION

TXA was administered intravenously prior to tourniquet compression could effectively reduce blood loss in patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty. However, there was no significant difference in knee swelling rate, subcutaneous bruising and petechiae incidence, knee function, complication rate or satisfaction between patients who TXA was given intravenously before tourniquet compression and release in primary TKA.

Blood Loss in Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty with Limited Tourniquet Application: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Tourniquet application in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has many benefits and may have a role in the incidence of perioperative complications. Our aims were to examine the safety of applying a tourniquet for a limited amount of time during primary unilateral TKA (specifically, during cementation and final component fixation only) and to compare perioperative complications between the limited-application group and the full-application group.

Methods

We conducted a randomized controlled study of 62 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA. Patients were randomly allocated to either the limited or full tourniquet application. The follow-up period was 6 months. We evaluated intraoperative, postoperative, total, and hidden blood loss as the primary outcome measures and clearance of the surgical field, operative duration, and perioperative complications as the secondary outcome measures.

Results

We found a significant difference in surgical field clearance between the groups. There was no significant difference in total, hidden, or postoperative blood loss between the groups. Mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the full-application group than in the limited-application group (171.742 ± 19.710 versus 226.258 ± 50.290 mL; p = 0.001). Perioperative complications, including allogeneic blood transfusion rates, did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusions

Limited tourniquet application is safe to use in primary unilateral TKA and does not increase the incidence of perioperative complications or total blood loss when compared with a standard, full-time tourniquet application.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

With or without a Tourniquet? A Comparative Study on Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients without Comorbidities

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effects of tourniquet use and the complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients without comorbidities to investigate whether tourniquet application can be employed without adverse effects and to assess its impact on the occurrence of any complications. Materials and Methods: A total of 106 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were divided randomly into two groups according to whether a tourniquet was used during the surgery or not. Patients with comorbidities (except arterial hypertension) were excluded from the study. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, joint range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) score, total blood loss during and after surgery, postoperative analgesic consumption, and side effects were the main factors evaluated in the study. Results: In the tourniquet group, where the VAS scores were higher, the use of analgesics was also significantly higher. While there was no statistically significant difference in total blood loss between the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups, the postoperative and occult blood losses were higher in the tourniquet group. The differences between the two groups in all other parameters were very small and not statistically significant. Conclusions: The findings of the current study suggest that when the comorbidities of patients are thoroughly documented and clarified prior to surgery, tourniquets should be applied selectively to individuals without any pre-existing health conditions.

Defining tourniquetless total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

Introduction

Performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without the use of tourniquet is gaining popularity. However, performing a "tourniquetless TKA" has a variety of meanings regarding the timing and application of a tourniquet and associated techniques. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature and more accurately define "tourniquetless TKA."

Methods

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for articles published from 2016 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included papers that used "tourniquetless" or a similar term to describe their TKA procedure, original clinical studies, English language, and full-text studies.

Results

A total of 1,096 studies were identified, of which 84 full text studies with 9,349 total patients were included. Overall, 17 (20.2%) of the studies performing tourniquetless TKA never applied a tourniquet, 17 (20.2%) applied a tourniquet but kept it deflated throughout the entire procedure, 2 (2.4%) applied a tourniquet and inflated during cementation only, and 48 (57.1%) did not specify. Ultimately, of the studies that did specify tourniquet use, only 17 studies (47.2%) truly never applied a tourniquet throughout the procedure. A review of 7 recommended techniques to control blood loss in tourniquetless TKA found that no one technique was performed in more than 10.6% of patients.

Conclusion

Variation in the definition of tourniquetless TKA and the utilization of augmented techniques to control blood loss remains. We propose the terms "tourniquetless" for no tourniquet application, "tourniquet-available" for tourniquet applied but kept deflated throughout surgery, and "tourniquet-assisted" for tourniquet inflation during cementation only. These terms can help better differentiate the literature, guide surgeons as they transition to tourniquetless TKA, and assist in the development of more definitive protocols for tourniquetless TKA.

Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Purpose

The intra-operative use of tourniquets during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is common practice. The advantages of tourniquet use include decreased operating time and the creation of a bloodless visualisation field. However, tourniquet use has recently been linked with increased post-operative pain, reduced range of motion, and slower functional recovery. Importantly, there is limited evidence of the effect of tourniquet use on infection risk. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to fill this gap in the literature by synthesising data pertaining to the association between tourniquet use and infection risk in TKA.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov up to May 2021. Randomized control trials were included, comparing TKA outcomes with and without tourniquet use. The primary outcome was overall infection rate. Secondary outcomes included superficial and deep infection, skin necrosis, skin blistering, DVT rate, and transfusion rate.

Results

14 RCTs with 1329 patients were included. The pooled incidence of infection in the tourniquet group (4.0%, 95% CI = 2.7–5.4) was significantly higher compared to the non-tourniquet group (2.0%, 95% CI = 1.1–3.1) with an OR of 1.9 (95% CI = 1.1–3.76, p = 0.03). The length of hospital stay, haemoglobin drop (0.33 95% CI =0.12–0.54), P = 0.002) and transfusion rates (OR of 2.7, 95%CI = 1.4–5.3, P = < 0.01) were higher in the tourniquet group than the non-tourniquet group. The difference in the length of inhospital stay was 0.24 days favouring the non-tourniquet group (95% CI = 0.10–0.38, P = < 0.01). The incidence of skin blistering (OR 2.6, 95% CI = 0.7–9.9, p = 0.17), skin necrosis (OR 3.0, 95% CI = 0.50–19.3, p = 0.25), and DVT rates (OR 1.5, 95% CI = 0.60–3.60, p = 0.36) did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

Quantitative synthesis of the data suggested tourniquet use was associated with an increased overall risk of infection, intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion and longer hospital stay. Findings of this meta-analysis do not support the routine use of tourniquet in TKA and arthroplasty surgeons should consider any potential additional risks associated with its use.

Level of evidence

meta-analysis, Level II.

Effect of tourniquet use on blood loss, pain, functional recovery, and complications in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

Background

Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been largely studied to confirm its advantages in terms of accurate component positioning, microembolus formation, less blood loss, and so on, but is currently usually performed under tourniquet due to its longer operative time than conventional TKA. The aim of this study was to estimate the effects of tourniquet use in robot-assisted TKA on blood loss, pain, functional recovery, and complications.

Methods

Patients scheduled for robot-assisted TKA were prospectively randomized into a tourniquet or non-tourniquet group (each n = 14). The primary outcome measure was blood loss. The secondary outcome measures were operation time; visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores; time to achieve the first straight-leg raise; swelling of the thigh, knee, and calf; range of motion; Hospital for Special Surgery score; length of stay; and postoperative complications.

Results

There was no significant difference in total blood loss between the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups (738.57 ± 276.158 vs. 866.85 ± 243.422 ml, P = 0.061). The tourniquet group showed significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), but higher hidden blood loss (P = 0.002). The non-tourniquet group showed better knee range of motion on postoperative days (PODs) 1–3 (all P < 0.001), less thigh swelling on PODs 2 and 3 (P < 0.05), earlier straight-leg raising (P = 0.044), and shorter length of stay (P = 0.044). Thigh pain VAS score at 1 month after surgery was significantly greater in the tourniquet group (P < 0.001), as was knee pain during activity and at rest on PODs 2–3 (all P < 0.05). The tourniquet group also showed a significantly higher rate of tension blisters (28.8% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.038).

Conclusions

Tourniquet use during robot-assisted TKA does not reduce total blood loss, and it appears to increase postoperative pain, aggravate muscle injury, and prolong postoperative recovery.

Trial registration ChiCTR, ChiCTR2100041800. Registered 5 January 2021, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Tourniquet use in primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with a hypercoagulable status: a prospective thromboelastography trial

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether the use of a tourniquet changes the blood coagulation state following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by means of conventional coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG) analyses.

METHODS

A total of 154 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA from January 2018 to October 2020 were enrolled. Seventy-nine patients were randomized into a tourniquet group, and 75 were randomized into a no-tourniquet group. Demographic data, surgical time, intra-operative blood loss, transfusion rate, and wound complications were collected. Complete blood count, conventional coagulation tests, and TEG were performed the day before surgery, one day after surgery, three days after surgery, and seven days after surgery. Lower extremity Doppler ultrasound was performed the day before surgery and seven days after surgery.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the patients were similar between the two groups. Hidden blood loss, transfusion rate, and wound complications were similar between the two groups, but the intra-operative blood loss of the tourniquet group was lower than that of the no-tourniquet group. The calculated total blood loss of the tourniquet group was higher than that of the no-tourniquet group. In terms of conventional coagulation tests and TEG, the tourniquet group had higher values of fibrin degradation products, D-dimer, maximum amplitude, and coagulation index (p < 0.001). The incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the tourniquet group was higher than that in the no-tourniquet group (21.5% compared with 8%; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The application of a tourniquet during TKA significantly increases the amount of calculated total blood loss and does not decrease the post-operative transfusion rate. Using a tourniquet in routine TKA exacerbates the early post-operative hypercoagulable status together with a higher incidence of below-knee asymptomatic DVT observed via conventional coagulation tests, TEG, and ultrasonic Doppler.