Bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation versus simple bone transport in the treatment of large bone defects of lower limbs after trauma

Surgical treatment of infectious severe calcaneal bone defects in children by the Ilizarov technique

INTRODUCTION

The soft tissue of the heel is weak, and calcaneal bone defects occur easily post-infection, resulting in the inability of paediatric patients to walk normally. Calcaneal reconstruction is challenging. We aimed to evaluate the methodology and clinical effects of the Ilizarov technique in the treatment of calcaneal infectious bone defects.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 12 children with infectious calcaneal bone defects treated by the Ilizarov technique in our center from January 2018 to August 2022.Stump lengthening of the calcaneus was performed in nine cases. Due to severe calcaneus infection the calcaneus was removed, and talus lengthening was performed in three children. Two children were treated with drug-loaded spacer bone cement to control peripheral soft tissue infection before bone elongation could be performed, while the other ten cases underwent bone lengthening at one stage after radical debridement. Pain, foot function, self-care ability and hind foot function were evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Maryland Foot Score, Activity of Daily Living scale, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society retro ankle foot score.

RESULTS

In this cohort of 12 children, the time for bone lengthening ranged from 32 to 64 days (mean 41.75 ± 10.09 days), and the distance of bone lengthening was between 2.6 cm and 5.4 cm (mean 3.57 ± 0.86 cm). The inflammation indicators CRP, ESR, and IL-6 were significantly reduced after radical debridement (15.72 ± 3.09 vs 6.04 ± 1.28, 25.20 ± 2.72 vs 15.11 ± 1.56, 16.39 ± 3.75 vs 2.99 ± 1.08, respectively; p < 0.01). Bone reconstruction effectively reduced pain in the affected limb and significantly improved foot function, self-care ability, and hind foot function in these children. In four cases, external fixators were removed and an Achilles tendon lengthening operation was performed to further reconstruct calcaneal bone function. After surgical treatment, all the children in this cohort were able to return to normal life.

CONCLUSION

The Ilizarov technique for treating large infectious calcaneal bone defects and bone lengthening can effectively reconstruct the function of the calcaneal bone without significantly affecting the ankle joint.

Characterization and Biocompatibility Assessment of 3D-Printed HA/PCL Porous Bionic Bone Scaffold: in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to characterize a three-dimensional-printed hydroxyapatite (HA)/polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold and assess its biocompatibility both in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

A bionic, porous HA/PCL scaffold was fabricated using 3D printing, and its microstructure, porosity, hydrophilicity, and mechanical properties were evaluated through scanning electron microscopy and various assays. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and vascular endothelial progenitor cells (VEPCs) were co-cultured with the scaffold, and their proliferation and osteogenic differentiation were assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8, ALP assays, and alizarin red staining. Osteogenic marker expression was analyzed via qRT-PCR. In vivo bone regeneration was evaluated through histological analysis of H&E and Masson's trichrome staining in a rat cranial defect model.

RESULTS

The average pore size of the scaffold was 462.00 ± 100.389 μm, with a porosity of 53%, a water absorption expansion rate of 5.10%, a contact angle of 94.55°, an elastic modulus of 53.82 MPa, and a compressive strength of 6.10 MPa. ALP activity and qRT-PCR analysis of osteogenic markers (BMP2, OCN, Runx2) showed significant upregulation in cells co-cultured with the scaffolds. In vivo experiments demonstrated enhanced bone regeneration and collagen deposition in the HA/PCL scaffold group.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the HA/PCL scaffold promotes osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration, making it suitable for bone tissue engineering applications.

Are the outcomes of bone transport in the treatment of bone defects in the upper- middle and lower-middle tibia similar?

The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of bone transport in treating upper- middle vs. lower- middle tibial bone defects. Sixty-two patients with tibial infected large segmental defects treated by bone transport were analyzed retrospectively and divided into distal group (lower- middle tibial bone defects and proximal transport, n=38) and proximal group (upper- middle tibial bone defects and distal transport, n=24). The demographic data were not significant different (P > 0.05). External fixation index (ETI), bone defect union time (BDUT), regenerate consolidation time (RCT), bone healing and functional outcomes evaluated by Association for the Study and Application of the Methods of Ilizarov score, postoperative complications evaluated by Paley classification, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were recorded and compared at a minimum follow-up of 20 months. There were no significant differences in flap repair, follow-up time, ETI, RCT, bone healing, functional outcomes and complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, in the distal group, the BDUT was significantly longer, and the AOFAS score was significantly lower than those in the proximal group (17.5±2.5 vs 15.9±3.1 months, 70.0±5.5 vs 72.8±4.8, respectively) (P < 0.05). The overall outcomes of bone transport in treating upper- middle vs. lower- middle tibial bone defects are similar. However, the upper- middle tibia bone defects heal faster than the lower- middle tibial bone defects, and distal transport has a greater adverse effect on the ankle and foot joints than proximal transport. Therefore, traditional distal tibial transport near the ankle joint should be taken with caution.

Semi-focal bone transport versus traditional bone transport technique for the management of large tibial bone defects after trauma

How to deal with large tibial bone defects is still controversial. The purpose of this research was to compare the semi-focal bone transport (SFBT) technique with traditional bone transport (TBT) technique for treating such patients. Sixty-two patients were included and retrospectively analyzed. In all cases, after radical debridement large tibial bone defects remained. Patients were treated by the SFBT or TBT technique. The distraction, consolidation duration and complications were recorded by the patients' medical files. Based on the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard, the bone and functional results were evaluated. The mean bone defect size was 7.7 ± 1.6 cm and 7.5 ± 2.1 cm for SFBT and TBT patients. The mean external fixation index (EFI) was 1.51 ± 0.14 months/cm and 1.89 ± 0.25 months/cm for SFBT and TBT patients (p < 0.05), respectively. With respect to bone and function results, there was no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean number of complications per patient was 1.1 ± 0.6 and 1.6 ± 0.7 for SFBT and TBT patients (p < 0.05). Compared to the traditional bone transport technique, patients using the semi-focal bone transport technique achieved better clinical effects, including shorter EFI and less complications. Therefore, the SFBT technique could be a new option for patients with large tibial bone defects.

Reconstruction of an Extensive Segmental Radial Shaft Bone Defect by Vascularized 3D-Printed Graft Cage

We report here a 46-year-old male patient with a 14 cm segmental bone defect of the radial shaft after third degree open infected fracture caused by a shrapnel injury. The patient underwent fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis and bone reconstruction of the radial shaft by a vascularized 3D-printed graft cage, including plastic coverage with a latissimus dorsi flap and an additional central vascular pedicle. Bony reconstruction of segmental defects still represents a major challenge in musculo-skeletal surgery. Thereby, 3D-printed scaffolds or graft cages display a new treatment option for bone restoration. As missing vascularization sets the limits for the treatment of large-volume bone defects by 3D-printed scaffolds, in the present case, we firstly describe the reconstruction of an extensive radial shaft bone defect by using a graft cage with additional vascularization.

Advances in the Application of Bone Transport Techniques in the Treatment of Bone Nonunion and Bone Defects

Bone nonunion and bone defects frequently occur following high-energy open injuries or debridement surgeries, presenting complex challenges to treatment and significantly affecting patients' quality of life. At present, there are three primary treatment options available for addressing bone nonunion and bone defects: vascularized bone grafts, the Masquelet technique, and the Ilizarov technique. The Ilizarov technique, also known as distraction osteogenesis, is widely favored by orthopedic surgeons because of several advantages, including minimal soft tissue requirements, low infection risk, and short consolidation time. However, in recent years, the application of the Masquelet technique has resulted in novel treatment methods for managing post-traumatic bone infections when bone defects are present. Although these new techniques do not constitute a panacea, they continue to be the most commonly employed options for treating complex large bone nonunion and bone defects. This review evaluates the currently available research on the Ilizarov and Masquelet bone transport techniques applied at various anatomical sites. Additionally, it explores treatment durations and associated complications to establish a theoretical foundation that can guide clinical treatment decisions and surgical procedures for the management of bone nonunion and bone defects.

Enhancing cranial defect repair in rats: investigating the effect of combining Total Flavonoids from Rhizoma Drynariae with calcium phosphate/collagen scaffolds

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of total flavonoids of Rhizoma Drynariae (TFRD) in conjunction with a calcium phosphate/collagen scaffold for the repair of cranial defects in rats.

METHODS

The subjects, rats, were segregated into four groups: Control, TFRD, Scaffold, and TFRD + Scaffold. Cranial critical bone defects, 5 mm in diameter, were artificially induced through precise drilling. Post-surgery, at intervals of 2, 4, and 8 weeks, micro-CT scans were conducted to evaluate the progress of skull repair. Hematoxylin-eosin and Masson staining techniques were applied to discern morphological disparities, and immunohistochemical staining was utilized to ascertain the expression levels of local osteogenic active factors, such as bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and osteocalcin (OCN).

RESULTS

Upon examination at the 8-week mark, cranial defects in the Scaffold and TFRD + Scaffold cohorts manifested significant repair, with the latter group displaying only negligible foramina. Micro-CT examination unveiled relative to its counterparts, and the TFRD + Scaffold groups exhibited marked bone regeneration at the 4- and 8-week intervals. Notably, the TFRD + Scaffold group exhibited substantial bone defect repair compared to the TFRD and Scaffold groups throughout the entire observation period, while histomorphological assessment demonstrated a significantly higher collagen fiber content than the other groups after 2 weeks. Immunohistochemical analysis further substantiated that the TFRD + Scaffold had augmented expression of BMP-2 at 2, 4 weeks and OCN at 2 weeks relative to other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The synergistic application of TFRD and calcium phosphate/collagen scaffold has been shown to enhance bone mineralization, bone plasticity, and bone histomorphology especially during initial osteogenesis phases.

Shortening/re-lengthening and nailing versus bone transport for the treatment of segmental femoral bone defects

Segmental femoral bone defects are a severe challenge for orthopedic trauma surgeons. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of the shortening/re-lengthening and nailing (SRN) technique with the traditional bone transport (BT) technique in treating patients with such defects. A retrospective study was conducted involving 46 patients with segmental femoral bone defects, with 21 cases treated using the SRN technique (SRN group) and 25 cases managed with the traditional BT technique (BT group). The mean length of the bone defect was 5.8 ± 1.1 cm in the SRN group and 6.1 ± 1.6 cm in the BT group. Various parameters including time in frame, external fixation index, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores, bone healing scores, limb function scores, and complications were recorded. The mean time in frame for the SRN group was 3.7 ± 1.4 months, significantly shorter than the 9.4 ± 3.7 months observed in the BT group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the mean external fixation index for the SRN group was 0.62 ± 0.12 months/cm, significantly lower than the 1.50 ± 0.19 months/cm observed in the BT group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in bone healing scores between the SRN and BT groups (p = 0.237). The SAS scores and incidence of complications were significantly lower in the SRN group compared to the BT group (p < 0.05). Overall, the SRN technique demonstrated superior clinical efficacy compared to the traditional BT technique for the management of segmental femoral bone defects, with shorter time in frame, lower external fixation index, and reduced complications. Therefore, the SRN technique may be considered an optimal choice for treating patients with such conditions.

Predictive factors for docking site procedure in bone transport for large lower extremity segmental defects

BACKGROUND

Segmental bone transport is a common technique for treating large segmental bone defects. However, a docking site procedure is often necessary in segmental bone transport. To date, no prognostic factors for the need of docking site procedure have been reported. Thus, the decision is often made at random, based on the surgeon's subjective judgment and experience. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for the need of docking site operation.

METHODS

Patients with segmental bone transport in lower extremity bone defects were included regardless of age, aetiology, and defect size. We excluded patients undergoing treatments that were not yet completed, and those who discontinued therapy by any reason. The need for docking site operation was modelled with logistical and linear regression as well as univariate analysis of variances (ANOVA). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients from age 12 to 74 years (mean age: 39.07 ± 18.20 years) were included. The mean defect size was 76.39 ± 41.10 mm. The duration of transport (days) showed a significant influence (p = 0.049, 95%CI: 1.00-1.02) on the need for docking site operation. No other significant influences were detected.

CONCLUSION

A link between the duration of transport and the need for docking site operation was detected. Our data showed that if a threshold of about 188 days is exceeded, docking surgery should be considered.

A modified hybrid transport technique combined with a retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis nail for the management of distal tibial periarticular osteomyelitis and associated defects

BACKGROUND

This paper aimed to propose a modified technique of bone transport. An annular frame combined with a retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis nail was used in this novel technique for treating large distal tibial periarticular osteomyelitis and associated defects.

METHODS

Our team conducted a retrospective research. Forty-three patients with large distal tibial periarticular bone loss were involved in this study. Sixteen patients were treated using the modified hybrid transport technique (MHT group) while 27 were subjected to traditional bone transport (BT group). The mean bone loss was 7.8 ± 2.4 cm in the MHT group and 7.6 ± 2.6 cm in the BT group. The external fixation index, time in transport frame, self-rating anxiety scale, bone healing results and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean time in frame for the MHT group was 3.6 ± 1.5 months, while that of the BT group was 10.3 ± 2.7 months (p < 0.05). The mean external fixation index of MHT group was 0.46 ± 0.08 months/cm versus 1.38 ± 0.24 months/cm of the BT group (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference for the bone healing results between the MHT and BT groups (p = 0.856). The self-rating anxiety scale and total complication incidence of the MHT group were significantly lower than that of BT patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the traditional BT technique, our modified hybrid transport technique showed better clinical outcomes for treating large distal tibial periarticular bone loss, including less time in transport frame, lower external fixation index and complication incidence. Therefore, this modified technique should be further promoted and developed.

Proximal versus distal bone transport for the management of large segmental tibial defect: a clinical case series

This retrospective study compared proximal bone transport and distal bone transport in a series of cases diagnosed with large segmental tibial defects. Patients with a tibial segmental defect (> 5 cm) were eligible for inclusion. Twenty-nine patients were treated using proximal bone transport technique (PBT group) and 21 cases were managed by distal bone transport technique (DBT group). We recorded the demographic information, operation indexes, external fixation index (EFI), visual analog score (VAS), limb function scores, and complications. Patients were followed for 24-52 months. There was no significant difference in operation time, blood loss, time in frame, EFI and HSS score between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the PBT group displayed better clinical effects than the DBT group, including higher AOFAS scores, lower VAS, and complication incidence (p < 0.05). In particular, the incidence of Grade-II pin-tract infection, transient loss of ankle movement, and foot drop was significantly lower in PBT group than that in DBT group (p < 0.05). Although both methods could be used safely for the management of large segmental tibial defects, the proximal bone transport may confer greater patient satisfaction because of better ankle functions and lower complications.

Comparison of Iliac Bone Transplantation with Bone Transport in the Treatment of Femur Fracture and Bone Defect

Objective

To compare the curative effect of iliac bone transplantation with the bone transport in the treatment of femur fracture complicated with a bone defect.

Methods

Patients with femur fractures and defects who were admitted to our hospital from January 1, 2020, to January 31, 2022, and met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively selected and allocated into an iliac bone transplantation group or a bone transport group. The treatment effect and quality of life of the two groups were compared.

Results

A total of 98 patients who met the inclusion standards were enrolled, including 50 cases in the iliac bone transplantation group and 48 cases in the bone transport group. There were no significant differences in IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, visual analog scale (VAS) score, or Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups on postsurgical day 1 (p=0.051, 0.150, 0.102, 0.564, and 0.826 respectively), but there were significant differences in the above index on postsurgical day 7 (all p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in social function, physical function, role function, and cognitive function between the two groups one week after the operation (p=0.245, 0.051, 0.102, and 0.067, respectively), but there were significant differences in the above parameters at one month after operation (p=0.001, 0.005, 0.005, and 0.001, respectively). The total effective rate of the bone transplantation group was significantly better than that of the iliac bone transplantation group (p=0.026). The number of postoperative complications in the bone removal group was significantly fewer than that of the iliac bone graft group (p=0.001).

Conclusion

Bone transport is effective in treating femur fractures complicated with bone defects, with fewer postoperative complications.

Shortening and re-lengthening versus bone transport for the treatment of distal tibial periarticular post-traumatic defects

In the present study, we presented our experience with a new modified technique of shortening and re-lengthening using a monolateral external frame combined with a calcaneal intramedullary nail and compared it with the bone transport technique for the treatment of distal tibial periarticular post-traumatic defects. Forty-one patients were retrospectively analyzed. Among them 19 were treated using our modified shortening and re-lengthening technique (MSR group) and 22 by bone transport (BT group). The difference in external fixation time (EFT), external fixation index (EFI), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and complications were compared between the two groups. The mean EFT was 3.4 ± 0.6 months in the MSR group and 7.5 ± 1.4 months in the BT group; the EFI was 0.57 ± 0.06 month/cm and 1.32 ± 0.23 month/cm, respectively. The EFT, EFI, and SAS scores were significantly lower in the MSR group than in the BT Group (p < 0.05). The mean number of complications per patient in the BT group was nearly 2.4 times that of the MSR group (p < 0.05). Our modified shortening and re-lengthening technique reduced the EFI and complication incidence compared to the bone transport technique. Therefore, patients with distal tibial periarticular post-traumatic defects can achieve great satisfaction with this new technique.

Union, complication, reintervention and failure rates of surgical techniques for large diaphyseal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To understand the potential and limitations of the different available surgical techniques used to treat large, long-bone diaphyseal defects by focusing on union, complication, re-intervention, and failure rates, summarizing the pros and cons of each technique. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to March 16th, 2022; Inclusion criteria were clinical studies written in English, of any level of evidence, with more than five patients, describing the treatment of diaphyseal bone defects. The primary outcome was the analysis of results in terms of primary union, complication, reintervention, and failure rate of the four major groups of techniques: bone allograft and autograft, bone transport, vascularized and non-vascularized fibular graft, and endoprosthesis. The statistical analysis was carried out according to Neyeloff et al., and the Mantel–Haenszel method was used to provide pooled rates across the studies. The influence of the various techniques on union rates, complication rates, and reintervention rates was assessed by a z test on the pooled rates with their corresponding 95% CIs. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence was based on Downs and Black’s “Checklist for Measuring Quality” and Rob 2.0 tool. Certainty of yielded evidence was evaluated with the GRADE system. Seventy-four articles were included on 1781 patients treated for the reconstruction of diaphyseal bone defects, 1496 cases in the inferior limb, and 285 in the upper limb, with trauma being the main cause of bone defect. The meta-analysis identified different outcomes in terms of results and risks. Primary union, complications, and reinterventions were 75%, 26% and 23% for bone allografts and autografts, 91%, 62% and 19% for the bone transport group, and 78%, 38% and 23% for fibular grafts; mean time to union was between 7.8 and 8.9 months in all these groups. Results varied according to the different aetiologies, endoprosthesis was the best solution for tumour, although with a 22% failure rate, while trauma presented a more composite outcome, with fibular grafts providing a faster time to union (6.9 months), while cancellous and cortical-cancellous grafts caused less complications, reinterventions, and failures. The literature about this topic has overall limited quality. However, important conclusions can be made: Many options are available to treat critical-size defects of the diaphysis, but no one appears to be an optimal solution in terms of a safe, satisfactory, and long-lasting outcome. Regardless of the bone defect cause, bone transport techniques showed a better primary union rate, but bone allograft and autograft had fewer complication, reintervention, and failure rates than the other techniques. The specific lesion aetiology represents a critical aspect influencing potential and limitations and therefore the choice of the most suitable technique to address the challenging large diaphyseal defects.

Acute shortening and re-lengthening versus antibiotic calcium sulfate-loaded bone transport for the management of large segmental tibial defects after trauma

Background

The purpose of this paper was to compare the clinical effects of acute shortening and re-lengthening (ASR) technique with antibiotic calcium sulfate-loaded bone transport (ACSBT) technique for the management of large segmental tibial defects after trauma.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 68 patients with large segmental tibial defects were included and completely followed. The bone loss was 3–10 cm. ASR group included 32 patients, while ACSBT group contained 36. There was no significant difference in demographic information between the two groups. The external fixation time (EFT) and external fixation index (EFI) were compared. Bone defect healing and limb functions were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. Complications were compared by Paley classification.

Results

The mean EFT was 9.2 ± 1.8 months in ASR group and 10.1 ± 2.0 months in ACSBT group, respectively. The mean EFI was 1.5 ± 0.2 month/cm and 1.4 ± 0.3 month/cm. According to the ASAMI criteria, in ASR group bone defect healing was excellent in 22 cases, good in 7 cases and fair in 3 cases. In ACSBT group, it was excellent in 23 cases, good in 11 cases and fair in 2 cases. In ASR group, the limb function was excellent in 15 cases, good in 7 cases and fair in 10 cases, while it was excellent in 14 cases, good in 9 cases and fair in 13 cases with ACSBT group. There was no significant difference in EFI, bone defect healing and limb functions between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean number of complications per patient in ACSBT group was significantly lower than that in ASR group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Both techniques can be successfully used for the management of large segmental tibial defects after trauma. There was no significant difference in EFI, limb functions and bone defect healing between the two groups. Compared with ASR group, the complication incidence in ACSBT group was lower, especially the infection-related complications. Therefore, for patients with large segmental bone defects caused by infection or osteomyelitis, ACSBT technique could be the first choice.