Comparing efficacy of a single intraarticular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with different hyaluronans for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized-controlled clinical trial

Randomized Controlled Trials Studying Nonoperative Treatments of Osteoarthritis Often Use Misleading and Uninformative Control Groups: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Because there are no known treatments that alter the natural course of the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis, nonoperative treatment needs to be compared with known effective treatments that seek to mitigate symptoms or with similarly invasive inert (placebo) treatments to determine effectiveness. Comparing a treatment to an uninformative control group may inappropriately legitimize and support the use of potentially ineffective treatments. We therefore investigated the prevalence of inappropriate control groups in musculoskeletal research and asked whether these are associated with reporting a positive treatment effect.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We systematically reviewed randomized trials of nonoperative treatments of osteoarthritis and asked: (1) What proportion of randomized trials use uninformative control groups (defined as a treatment less invasive than the tested treatment, or a treatment that might possibly not outperform placebo but is not acknowledged as such)? (2) Is the use of uninformative control groups independently associated with reporting a positive treatment effect (defined as p < 0.05 in favor of the intervention, or as making a recommendation favoring the intervention over the control treatment)?

METHODS

In a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase up to September 2023 for randomized controlled trials published between 2020 to 2022 that compared one or more nonoperative treatments for the symptoms of osteoarthritis. We excluded studies that contained a surgical treatment group. We identified 103 trials that met eligibility criteria, with a total of 15,491 patients. The risk of bias was high in 60% (n = 62) of trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, version 2. Although the high risk of bias in the included studies is concerning, it does not invalidate our design; instead, it highlights that some studies may use flawed methods to recommend treatments with unproven effectiveness beyond nonspecific effects because the kinds of bias observed would tend to increase the apparent benefit of the treatment(s) being evaluated. We used logistic regression to test the association of uninformative control groups with a positive treatment effect, accounting for potential confounders such as conflict of interest and study bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias score.

RESULTS

The use of uninformative control groups (treatments less invasive than the tested treatment, or treatments that might not outperform placebo but are not acknowledged as such) was found in 46% (47 of 103) of included studies. After accounting for potential confounding, there was no association between reporting positive treatment effects and the use of an uninformative control group. Studies with a low risk of bias had a lower likelihood of reporting a positive treatment effect (OR 0.2 [95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.9]; p = 0.04, model pseudo R 2 = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

The finding that recent studies that mimic high-level evidence often use uninformative control groups that do not adequately account for nonspecific effects (perceived treatment benefits unrelated to a treatment's direct physiological effects) points to a high risk of legitimizing ineffective treatments. This raises the ethical imperative for patients, clinicians, journal peer reviewers, and journal editors to hold researchers to the standard of an adequate, informative control group. Awareness and risk of bias checklists might help patients and clinicians forgo new treatments based on seemingly high-level evidence that may carry only iatrogenic, financial, and psychological harm (false hope, in particular).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

The efficacy and safety of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma versus sodium hyaluronate for the treatment of osteoarthritis: Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common degenerative joint disease that primarily affects the elderly individuals. Traditional treatments include medications and physical therapy, but recent attention has turned to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) injection therapies.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP combined with HA versus PRP alone in the treatment of KOA.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, which included covering publications from their inception to July 2024. Studies comparing PRP+HA with PRP alone were selected. Data on visual analog scale (VAS) scores, WOMAC total scores, Lequesne scores, and adverse events were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed via Review Manager 5.3.5.

RESULT

This meta-analysis included 16 studies involving a total of 1,384 patients. The VAS score comparison indicated that, in the long term, PRP combined with HA was more effective in reducing knee pain than PRP alone was (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.06, P =  0.01). The combined PRP and HA treatment achieved better results in terms of the WOMAC total score (MD =  -6.58, 95% CI: -10.65 to -2.52, P <  0.001). At the 6-month follow-up, the Lequesne index score comparison revealed that PRP combined with HA significantly improved knee pain scores compared with PRP alone (MD =  -1.38, 95% CI: -1.91 to -0.86, P <  0.001). In terms of adverse events, PRP+HA was associated with a lower risk of adverse events than PRP alone was (OR =  0.54, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.85, P =  0.009).

CONCLUSION

PRP combined with HA offers significant long-term benefits in pain relief and functional improvement over PRP alone for knee osteoarthritis, with better safety. The sequence of injection may influence treatment outcomes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024598691.

Most Orthopaedic Platelet-Rich Plasma Investigations Don't Report Protocols and Composition: An Updated Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature to assess the heterogeneity of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation and composition reporting for the treatment of musculoskeletal/orthopaedic pathologies.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify Level I and Level II studies from 2016 to 2022 that evaluated the use of PRP therapy for musculoskeletal pathologies. The search phrase used was "platelet-rich plasma clinical studies." Studies were assessed based on their reporting of the PRP preparation methods and reporting of PRP composition.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four studies (in 120 articles) met inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these studies, 15 (12.1%) provided comprehensive reporting, including a clear, well-described, and reproducible preparation protocol that future investigators can follow. Thirty-three studies (26.6%) quantitatively reported the final PRP product composition.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the studies using PRP for the treatment of musculoskeletal/orthopaedic pathologies, less than 20% provided a clear, well-described, and reproducible PRP preparation protocol, and only one-fourth of studies reported on the final PRP product composition.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A diverse current reporting of PRP composition between studies provides a high heterogeneity of the term "PRP," which becomes a limitation for a comparison of studies using PRP.

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Sinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CR) is a persistent inflammation of the nasal mucosa and paranasal sinuses. Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is a procedure that improves sinus drainage and ventilation. Despite advancements in ESS, additional corrective procedures post-ESS are often needed. Clinical trials have explored the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as adjunctive therapy after ESS. This study aims to provide evidence supporting the efficacy of PRP post-ESS for CS patients. Independent authors searched three electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)) and assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool (RoB 2). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. We pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Five RCTs met our inclusion criteria. Among 260 patients, 133 were allocated to PRP and 127 to the control group. PRP was associated with significantly lower postoperative nasal endoscopy scores (-1.74 (95% CI: -2.96, -0.52), P = 0.005) and Lund-Kennedy scores (-3.05 (95% CI: -4.97, -1.13), P = 0.002). PRP also significantly lowered Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scores at one and three months follow-up (-8.25 (95% CI: -11.26, -5.24), P < 0.00001, and -2.75 (95% CI: -5.38, -0.12), P = 0.04, respectively). Subgroup analysis based on the location of administration showed borderline significance in the middle meatus group (-2.70 (95% CI: -5.35, -0.04), P = 0.05). This meta-analysis supports using PRP following ESS for CS patients. Despite promising results, further RCTs are needed to confirm long-term efficacy.

Randomized Controlled Trials for Platelet-Rich Plasma Use in Knee Osteoarthritis Rarely Report Key Sociodemographic Patient Variables: A Scoping Review

Purpose

To investigate the characteristics and rate of sociodemographic variables reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

In January 2024, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried for the phrase "Platelet-Rich Plasma Knee Osteoarthritis." Included studies were RCTs investigating PRP use in knee OA published in English between 2012 and 2023. Each RCT was inspected for patient age and sex or gender as well as the following sociodemographic variables: race, ethnicity, insurance status, income, housing status, work status, and education. Data were presented in a descriptive fashion and analyzed using χ2 test and Fisher's exact test to compare 2 and 3 categorical variables, respectively, with significance defined as P < .05.

Results

From 2012 through 2023, 71 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Included publications reported both age and sex or gender in 71/71 papers (100%). Reporting rates for other sociodemographic variables were as follows: race (3/71, 4.23%), work status (5/71, 7.04%), and education (3/71, 4.23%). No studies included the ethnicity, insurance status, income, or housing status of the enrolled patients. There was no difference in reporting sociodemographic variables by journal (P = .083) or by year of publication (P = .340). Sociodemographic variables were reported significantly less frequently than age and sex or gender (P < .001).

Conclusions

In this study, we found that age and sex or gender are always reported in RCTs of PRP use for knee OA. However, other sociodemographic variables, such as race, work status, and education, that may be important to understand are rarely reported.

Clinical Relevance

Sociodemographic variables may affect outcomes in knee osteoarthritis. It is important to understand which of these variables are most studied and which variables are most overlooked. This will help us better understand the quality of the available information.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treating Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Interventional Study

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disorder causing pain, stiffness, and reduced function, significantly impacting the quality of life. Current treatments mainly provide symptomatic relief, with limited efficacy in halting disease progression. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a biological therapy rich in growth factors, has gained attention as a potential treatment for knee OA due to its regenerative properties. This study evaluates the efficacy of PRP in managing primary knee OA.

METHODOLOGY

This prospective interventional study included 100 patients diagnosed with primary knee OA, categorized using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale. Leukocyte-reduced PRP was prepared using the double-spin method and injected into the knee joint. The efficacy of PRP was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores at six weeks, three months, and six months post-injection. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0, with significance set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in the WOMAC and VAS scores were observed at all-time points post-PRP injection. The WOMAC score decreased from a baseline of 81.06 to 63.52 at six months (p < 0.001), and the VAS score reduced from 7.53 to 3.09 (p < 0.001). PRP was more effective in patients with lower body mass index (BMI) and less severe OA (Grades 1 and 2). Adverse events were mild, with 18% reporting mild pain or swelling.

CONCLUSION

PRP therapy significantly improves pain and function in patients with primary knee OA, particularly in early-stage disease. The treatment is generally safe, with minor adverse effects. PRP presents a promising non-surgical option, especially for those seeking to delay or avoid knee arthroplasty.

The Potential of Intra-Articular Therapies in Managing Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common degenerative and progressive joint disorder that negatively influences patients' quality of life. Intra-articular therapies, such as hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), have garnered attention for their potential to manage osteoarthritis OA symptoms effectively. This systematic review aims to identify the effectiveness and safety of HA and PRP treatment modalities in treating KOA.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science Core Collection, and Science Direct Collection Elsevier. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and observational studies were included in the review. The selection criteria focused on studies published in English within the last 10 years, involving subjects with KOA treated with intra-articular injections of HA or PRP and reporting on pain, function, or overall treatment efficacy outcomes.

RESULTS

The analysis showed that both HA and PRP significantly improve functionality and reduce pain in KOA patients. High molecular weight HA consistently reduced pain and improved joint mobility in various studies. PRP had better long-term outcomes when combined with HA, leading to greater pain reduction and functional improvement. Both therapies had generally favorable safety profiles, with only minor adverse events reported. However, there were potential biases identified across the studies, such as selection, performance, detection, and reporting biases, which impacted the reliability of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular treatments with HA and PRP show promise in managing knee osteoarthritis, with personalized treatment plans and further research needed to confirm these findings.

Platelet-rich plasma following endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic sinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

To comprehensively evaluate the reported clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients with chronic sinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Five digital online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched from inception up to 1st May 2023. Our specific outcomes involved postoperative nasal endoscopy scores measured via Lund-Kennedy score or Meltzer score, olfactory sensation scores and pre-operative anosmia duration. All data were pooled as standardised mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using the RevMan software.

RESULTS

Six RCTs were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, with a total of 169 patients. The risk of bias in the included RCTs was low in three RCTs, some concerns in one RCT and high risk in two RCTs. The overall analysis of the postoperative nasal endoscopy scores showed that the PRP group had lower scores compared to the control group (n = 3 RCTs, SMD = -1.19; 95% CI [-1.94, -0.44], p = .002). There was no significant difference between the PRP and control groups regarding anosmia duration (n = 2 RCTs, SMD = 0.21; 95% CI [-0.17, 0.59], p = 0.28) or olfactory sensation scores, despite the PRP group having higher scores (n = 2 RCTs, SMD = 0.53; 95% CI [-0.32, 1.39], p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the potential advantages of using PRP as an additional treatment for individuals with chronic sinusitis undergoing ESS. The improvements associated with PRP include facilitating wound healing, reducing inflammation and enhancing surgical outcomes. To optimise the use of PRP in clinical settings, future research should focus on conducting larger trials with standardised protocols.

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-articular Injections in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative disorder that causes significant pain and functional limitations. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has gained considerable attention in recent years in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. In this narrative review, we aim to investigate the role of intra-articular PRP injections in the treatment of knee and hip OA. The review also discusses different classifications of PRP based on composition. Furthermore, this narrative review also identified various limitations of PRP therapy in OA. PRP is classified into different types based on cell content and fibrin architecture, including pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP), leukocyte- and platelet-rich plasma (L-PRP), pure platelet-rich fibrin (P-PRF), and leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). Various clinical trials have shown that PRP is an effective option for the treatment of knee and hip OA. However, the superiority of PRP over hyaluronic acid has been reported inconsistently. This variability can be attributed to PRP preparation techniques. The safety profiles of PRP are generally favorable and the adverse effects are generally mild in nature. Although there is sufficient evidence in support of PRP in the treatment of OA, the long-term effects of PRP have not been reported. Further studies should focus on longer follow-up periods to identify the efficacy and safety of PRP in treating knee OA. There is also a need for standardization of PRP preparations in OA management.

Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Medical and Surgical Specialties: Quality, Evaluation, Evidence, and Enforcement

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used in various medical and surgical specialties for its regenerative properties, including aesthetics (facial rejuvenation, hair restoration, and skin tightening) and orthopedics (treatment of tendinitis and osteoarthritis). However, the inconsistent literature on PRP's efficacy and safety leads to critical knowledge gaps. This systematic review evaluates quality control measures in PRP preparation and application and explores the regulatory environment governing its clinical use. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, for studies published from January 2020 to April 2024. The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving human participants undergoing PRP treatment for aesthetic or regenerative purposes. Key parameters such as the PRP preparation methods, platelet concentration, and quality control measures were analyzed. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024557669). Results: Out of 75 RCTs involving 5726 patients, the review identified significant variability in PRP preparation methods and application techniques, including differences in centrifugation protocols and platelet concentration levels. A new evidence-based scoring system, the William-Eqram Scoring System for PRP Quality Reporting (WESS-PQR), was proposed to address these inconsistencies. Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.79) between proper temperature control during preparation and PRP efficacy. Initial platelet count assessment showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.57) with efficacy. Conclusions: Standardized PRP preparation protocols and robust regulatory frameworks are urgently needed to ensure the safety and efficacy of PRP treatments. The proposed WESS-PQR scoring system can serve as a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers, promoting consistency and reliability in PRP applications.

Randomized Controlled Trials on Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis Poorly Adhere to the Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopaedics (MIBO) Guidelines: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment for knee osteoarthritis has grown exponentially over the past decade; however, its scientific evaluation is highly variable. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons addressed the need for the standardization of orthobiologics studies by publishing the Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopaedics (MIBO) guidelines in May 2017. In total, the MIBO guidelines are divided into 12 categories, encompassing 23 checklist items.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze how well randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PRP interventions for knee osteoarthritis adhered to the MIBO guidelines. We hypothesized that most articles would report <80% of the MIBO criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used to perform a systematic review in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria included English-language RCTs that assessed PRP interventions for knee osteoarthritis and reported beginning patient enrollment in June 2017 or later. The original 23 MIBO checklist items were separated and modified into a 44-point checklist. Adherence was determined by calculating the total percentage of checklist items that each article adequately and clearly reported from the 44-point checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 25 RCTs (2356 patients) were included in this study. The weighted mean age was 57.7 ± 4.4 years, with 42.9% being male. On average, only 53.1% ± 10.4% (range, 31.8%-77.3%) of the 44-point MIBO checklist items were reported per article. No articles had adherence rates ≥80%, 5 (20.0%) had rates between 60% and 79.9%, and 20 (80.0%) had rates ≤59.9%. Categories fluctuated in adherence, with "Intervention" having the greatest adherence (100.0%) and "Activation" having the lowest (14.0%). Additionally, 4 (33.3%) categories had adherence rates ≥80%, 0 had rates from 60% to 79.9%, and 8 (66.7%) had rates ≤59.9%.

CONCLUSION

The overall mean adherence to MIBO guidelines by RCTs on PRP interventions for knee osteoarthritis was 53.1%. To increase the reproducibility, improve transparency, and assess the treatment efficacy of future PRP studies, reporting of MIBO guidelines should be improved.

Clinical Outcome of Multiple Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection and Correlation with PDGF-BB in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

(1) Background: Current treatments for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), such as intra-articular corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid (HA) injections, are controversial due to their ineffectiveness in preventing disease progression. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has become a promising and possible treatment for KOA. It is thought to enhance articular cartilage regeneration and reduce OA-related impairment. PRP contains growth factors such as PDGF-BB, which stimulates growth and inhibits joint damage. Based on numerous studies, after a certain amount of time, it was found that multiple PRP treatments reduced pain more than a single injection. This study evaluates the efficacy of multiple PRP (m-PRP) injections compared to multiple HA (m-HA) injections for KOA treatment, focusing on their correlation with PDGF-BB levels. (2) Methods: In this single-center, open-label, randomized, comparative clinical trial, 30 KOA patients received m-PRP and m-HA injections. VAS and WOMAC were used to evaluate clinical outcomes and PDGF-BB concentrations. (3) Results: The study analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction in pain indices. In both the m-PRP and m-HA groups after 12 weeks, m-PRP showed superior results. PDGF-BB concentrations also increased, with a strong negative correlation and statistical significance using Spearman's rho. (4) Conclusions: Multiple PRP injections are safe and associated with elevated PDGF-BB, reduced VAS and WOMAC scores, providing the potential for articular cartilage regeneration and inhibiting knee osteoarthritis progression.

The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave combined with platelet rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with meniscus injury: A retrospective analysis

Objective

To determine the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with meniscus injury in terms of pain relief, functional outcome and complications.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. Clinical data of 144 patients with KOA accompanied by medial meniscus injury, who received treatment in Jilin Provincial People's Hospital from March 2021 to December 2022, were retrospectively evaluated. A total of 128 patients (81 males and 47 females) were finally included in the study after screening. Of them, 45 patients received PRP treatment (PRP-group), 43 patients received ESW treatment (ESW-group), and 40 patients received ESW combined with PRP treatment (Combined-group). The relief of knee joint pain and functional improvement among three groups of patients were compared.

Results

After treatment, visual analogue scale (VAS), Lequesne, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores of patients in the Combined-group were significantly lower than those in the other two groups (p<0.05). Combined ESW-PRP treatment was associated with significantly greater joint range of motion of patients compared to ESW and PRP alone (p<0.05). The total incidence of related complications in the Combined-group was lower compared to the other two groups (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with PRP or ESW treatment alone, ESW combined with PRP for KOA with meniscus injury can better alleviate pain, achieve faster functional recovery, and significantly reduce complications.

Comparative effectiveness of intra-articular therapies in knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis comparing platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with other treatment modalities

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a progressive joint disease commonly treated with intra-articular injections, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), or corticosteroids (CS). This updated meta-analysis aims to enhance the statistical power of the results and provide comprehensive clinical evidence that reflects the most current research. By doing so, the authors aim to suggest a reliable estimate for the development of guidelines, addressing the pressing need for effective and minimally invasive treatment options.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Central were searched until March 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of intra-articular injectable therapies, including PRP, HA, CS, and placebo, in KOA. Data extraction involved baseline characteristics and outcome measures [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, KOOS, and IKDC scores] at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Statistical analysis, including subgroup analysis, assessment of heterogeneity, and publication bias, was conducted using Review Manager.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis of 42 studies involving 3696 patients demonstrated that PRP treatment resulted in significant pain relief compared to HA injections, as evidenced by improved WOMAC pain (MD: -0.74; 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.46; P≤0.00001; I 2=94%) and VAS pain (MD: -0.65; 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.06; P=0.03; I2=97%) outcomes. Similarly, PRP showed greater efficacy in reducing WOMAC pain (MD: -8.06; 95% CI: -13.62 to -2.51: P=0.004; I 2=96%) and VAS pain (MD: -1.11; 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.59; P≤0.0001; I 2=68%) compared to CS injections, with the most significant improvement observed at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP is an effective treatment for KOA. It provides symptomatic relief, has the potential to reduce disease progression, and has sustained effects up to 12 months. PRP offers superior pain relief and functional enhancement compared to CS and HA injections.

The Synergistic Effects of Hyaluronic Acid and Platelet-Rich Plasma for Patellar Chondropathy

Musculoskeletal disorders are increasingly prevalent worldwide, causing significant socioeconomic burdens and diminished quality of life. Notably, patellar chondropathy (PC) is among the most widespread conditions affecting joint structures, resulting in profound pain and disability. Hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have emerged as reliable, effective, and minimally invasive alternatives. Continuous research spanning from laboratory settings to clinical applications demonstrates the numerous advantages of both products. These encompass lubrication, anti-inflammation, and stimulation of cellular behaviors linked to proliferation, differentiation, migration, and the release of essential growth factors. Cumulatively, these benefits support the rejuvenation of bone and cartilaginous tissues, which are otherwise compromised due to the prevailing degenerative and inflammatory responses characteristic of tissue damage. While existing literature delves into the physical, mechanical, and biological facets of these products, as well as their commercial variants and distinct clinical uses, there is limited discussion on their interconnected roles. We explore basic science concepts, product variations, and clinical strategies. This comprehensive examination provides physicians with an alternative insight into the pathophysiology of PC as well as biological mechanisms stimulated by both HA and PRP that contribute to tissue restoration.

Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome Improves Clinical Outcomes and Changes Biomarkers in Knee Osteoarthritis

(1) Background: The current treatment for osteoarthritis is ineffective due to its focus on pain relief and lack of cartilage repair. Viscosupplementation such as hyaluronic acid improves symptoms but remains unnoticed for several months. Researchers are exploring cell-based therapies such as mesenchymal stem cells secretome and mesenchymal stem cells, which can repair cartilage damage. The objective of the research is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the secretome derived from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) with hyaluronic acid (HA). (2) Methods: An open-label clinical trial involving 30 knee osteoarthritis patients divided into two groups received UC-MSC secretome and hyaluronic acid doses. The study assessed clinical outcomes using VAS and WOMAC and measured MMP-3 and TGF-β1 levels before and after treatment. (3) Results: A study of 30 subjects found that the UC-MSC secretome group showed a decrease in pain in the OA knee compared to the HA group. The therapy was most effective after the third injection, and the group showed a decrease in the MMP-3 ratio and an increase in TGF-β1 compared to the hyaluronic acid group. (4) Conclusions: UC-MSC secretome intra-articular injections showed superior clinical improvement, biomarker changes, and no side effects compared to hyaluronic acid over a 5-week interval.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Power-Mix Gel (ppm)-An Orthobiologic Optimization Protocol Rich in Growth Factors and Fibrin

Platelet- and fibrin-rich orthobiologic products, such as autologous platelet concentrates, have been extensively studied and appreciated for their beneficial effects on multiple conditions. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and its derivatives, including platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in clinical and laboratory settings, particularly in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoarthritis (OA). Although PRP and PRF have distinct characteristics, they share similar properties. The relative abundance of platelets, peripheral blood cells, and molecular components in these orthobiologic products stimulates numerous biological pathways. These include inflammatory modulation, augmented neovascularization, and the delivery of pro-anabolic stimuli that regulate cell recruitment, proliferation, and differentiation. Furthermore, the fibrinolytic system, which is sometimes overlooked, plays a crucial role in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine by regulating proteolytic activity and promoting the recruitment of inflammatory cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in areas of tissue regeneration, such as bone, cartilage, and muscle. PRP acts as a potent signaling agent; however, it diffuses easily, while the fibrin from PRF offers a durable scaffolding effect that promotes cell activity. The combination of fibrin with hyaluronic acid (HA), another well-studied orthobiologic product, has been shown to improve its scaffolding properties, leading to more robust fibrin polymerization. This supports cell survival, attachment, migration, and proliferation. Therefore, the administration of the "power mix" containing HA and autologous PRP + PRF may prove to be a safe and cost-effective approach in regenerative medicine.