The role of point-of-Care Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Routine Joint evaluation and management in the Hemophilia Clinic - A Real World Experience

Unmet needs in hemophilic arthropathy

Hemophilia A and B are rare X-linked bleeding disorders caused by coagulation factor deficiencies, leading to joint bleeding, synovial hypertrophy and chronic hemophilic arthropathy marked by progressive cartilage and bone damage. Musculoskeletal issues remain the primary source of morbidity in people with hemophilia (PwH). Despite significant advances in prophylactic therapies, joint pain, functional limitations, and deterioration persist. The long-term impact of novel treatments on joint health and physical activity levels remains incompletely understood. Early detection and prevention of damage is challenging, highlighting the need for highly sensitive diagnostic tools to identify subclinical changes before irreversible damage occurs. Pain management, currently adapted from other conditions, does not fully meet the unique needs of PwH. Research into targeted pain relief, synovial hypertrophy management, and cartilage regeneration is crucial. Addressing unmet needs in diagnosis, treatment, and management requires collaboration between clinical and research communities to improve care effectiveness and enhance the quality of life for PwH.

The proportion of young male hemophilia patients who underwent ultrasound examinations: an observational study using a nationwide claims database

BACKGROUND

Advances in hemophilia treatment have reduced bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia (PWH) and improved their musculoskeletal prognosis; however, complete prevention of musculoskeletal disorders has not been achieved. Recently, the usefulness of ultrasound (US) examinations in the musculoskeletal assessment of PWH has been reported, but the actual use of US has been suggested to be limited. The aim of this study was to clarify the extent to which US is being performed on young male PWH at medical institutions in Japan.

METHODS

This was an observational study using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. We identified almost all male PWH aged under 30 years who were prescribed hemostatic agents between 2015 and 2021 in Japan. For each year, we calculated the proportion of PWH who underwent US and, as a sensitivity analysis, the proportion of PWH who underwent US examinations for musculoskeletal disease. The Cochran‒Armitage trend test was used to examine changes in the number of PWH who underwent US examinations over the observation period. The Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients were calculated from the proportion of US examinations performed at each medical institution annually.

RESULTS

A total of 2137-2483 male PWH younger than 30 years were identified annually. The annual proportion of PWH who underwent US ranged from 6.1 to 12.9%. By age group, the annual proportions of US were 6.7-14.4%, 8.1-16.6%, and 2.0-8.7% for 0-9, 10-19, and 20-29 years, respectively. The annual proportions of musculoskeletal US were 2.9-7.7%. The proportion of PWH who underwent US increased significantly over the seven-year period; however, it varied by medical institution (Gini coefficients 0.85-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of US for young PWH is becoming more widespread in Japan. However, US is performed at different rates among medical institutions.

Emerging Therapies in Hemophilia: Improving Equitable Access to Care

In recent years, gene therapy and bio-engineered hemostatic molecules have revolutionized treatment for people with hemophilia. These innovative therapies aim to decrease treatment burden and improve patient quality of life. Additional novel therapies, including next-generation mimetics and agents that rebalance hemostasis, are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Technological advances such as point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound and artificial intelligence may improve patient diagnostic and treatment outcomes. However, for the majority of patients with hemophilia worldwide, diagnosis and effective treatment are inaccessible. Achieving health equity for all hemophilia patients requires improved identification of barriers to optimal care, including socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, gender, disease severity, inhibitor status, age, and use of Hemophilia Treatment Centers. Access to novel hemophilia therapies should be ensured for all patients. Approaches to improving equity include a decision-making partnership between the patient and clinician, stakeholder engagement, and pharmaceutical industry support. The development of novel hemophilia therapies should be leveraged with a patient-centered care approach to improve health equity for all patients.

Contemporary approaches to treat people with hemophilia: what's new and what's not?

The care of people with hemophilia with access to treatment has evolved over the past 70 years, with an average life expectancy like unaffected peers. For people with hemophilia living in low- and middle-income countries, the same is not true because of the lack of access to diagnosis and treatment. It is imperative to close gaps in care that exist throughout the world. Here, we provide a narrative review of hemophilia and the treatments available to people with hemophilia A and B with the goal of achieving a hemophilia-free state. We aim to provide information on what is new and what gaps remain that preclude equitable outcomes for everyone with hemophilia. Information on the current state of hemophilia care and outcomes, the products available for the treatment of people with hemophilia, comprehensive interdisciplinary care of people with hemophilia, and the remaining gaps in care for people with hemophilia were assembled by the authors using relevant literature. Research must focus on preventing all bleeding, and new approaches to detect joint bleeding are needed. Training on and implementation of comprehensive interdisciplinary care is needed to elevate the standards of care in low- and middle-income countries. The development and introduction of improved factor replacement and nonfactor products, such as second-generation bispecific monoclonal antibodies and targeted inhibitors of the anticoagulant mechanisms along with genetic therapies, have the possibility of normalizing hemostasis and achieving health equity for people with hemophilia. Improved outcomes and, ultimately, health equity, can only be realized if diagnosis, education, and care are accessible to everyone living with hemophilia worldwide.

MR Imaging of Hemosiderin Deposition in the Ankle Joints of Patients with Haemophilia: The Contribution of a Multi-Echo Gradient-Echo Sequence-Correlation with Osteochondral Changes and the Number and Chronicity of Joint Bleeds

We aim (a) to introduce an easy-to-perform multi-echo gradient-echo sequence (mGRE) for the detection of hemosiderin deposition in the ankle joints of boys with haemophilia (b) to explore the associations between the presence and severity of hemosiderin deposition and the other components of haemophilic arthropathy, the clinical score, and the number and chronicity of joint bleeds. An MRI of 41 ankle joints of 21 haemophilic boys was performed on a 3 T MRI system using an mGRE sequence in addition to the conventional protocol. Conventional MRI and mGRE were separately and independently assessed by three readers, namely, two musculoskeletal radiologists and a general radiologist for joint hemosiderin. We set as a reference the consensus reading of the two musculoskeletal radiologists, who also evaluated the presence of synovial thickening, effusion, and osteochondral changes. Excellent inter-reader agreement was obtained using the mGRE sequence compared to the conventional protocol (ICC: 0.95-0.97 versus 0.48-0.89), with superior sensitivity (90-95% versus 50-85%), specificity (95.2-100% versus 76.2-95.2%), and positive (95-100% versus 71-94.4%) and negative predictive value (91.3-95.5% versus 87-63%). Hemosiderin deposition was associated with osteochondral changes, synovial thickening, clinical score, and the total number of ankle bleeds, while it was inversely related with the time elapsed between the last joint bleed and MRI. (p < 0.05). The application of an mGRE sequence significantly improved hemosiderin detection, even when performed by the less experienced reader. Joint hemosiderin deposition was associated with the other components of haemophilic arthropathy and was mostly apparent in recent joint bleeds.

Outcome measures in hemophilia: current and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia can detrimentally affect patients' quality of life and likelihood of survival. In the evolving landscape of therapies, the therapeutic gain of each treatment must be understood to accurately position it in the therapeutic armamentarium. Accordingly, appropriate outcomes must be measured with appropriate tools.

AREAS COVERED

Our narrative review (PubMed search for 'hemophilia AND outcome' until June 2023), provides a compendium of outcome measures used in hemophilia clinical research. To define each outcome measure's relative value and applicability, several characteristics are critically discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Bleeding assessment, first annual/annualized bleeding rate, remains central in evaluating the efficacy and safety of hemophilia treatments. As modern therapies improve clinical outcomes toward zero bleeding events, this endpoint may become less sensitive to detect differences between therapeutic approaches. Technological advancements necessitate the adaptation of outcome measures to address infrequent bleeding events, age-related comorbidities, and laboratory parameters with limited comparability after different treatments. Considerable effort has been dedicated to the development of tools that comprehensively assess coagulation, such as thrombin generation assays. Patient-reported outcome measures are gaining importance although limited by their subjectivity. A definitive set of research outcome measures remains elusive. Outcomes may need to be tailored to different therapeutic interventions.

Integrating musculoskeletal ultrasound as a shared decision-making tool in hemophilia care: observations from a 3-year study

Background

Hemophilia significantly impacts joint health, necessitating innovative strategies for early detection and management of joint damage.

Objectives

This study assessed the impact of incorporating musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) into shared decision-making processes on prophylaxis regimens for patients with hemophilia over a 3-year period.

Methods

The "Joint Damage Monitoring by Ultrasonography in Patients with Hemophilia in Japan" study was a long-term prospective observational study conducted at Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. It enrolled 174 participants with moderate-to-severe hemophilia A or B. Participants underwent 6 monthly MSKUS evaluations, generating 3582 images from 682 joints; the findings guided adjustments of prophylaxis.

Results

Over the 3-year period, 69.3% of participants adjusted their prophylaxis regimen at least once. Adherence, defined as the ratio of the prescribed to the actual frequency of prophylaxis administration as agreed upon by physicians and patients, was high at the beginning of the study, with an average of 91.6%, and remained high after 3 years at 94.7%. The HEAD-US scores for elbows, knees, and ankles significantly improved (all P < .0001). The spontaneous annual joint bleeding rate and Hemophilia Joint Health Scores also significantly improved (P = .001 and P = .004, respectively). Synovitis detection decreased from 12.9% to 1.6%, with the majority of identified synovitis being subclinical (11.7%) and not associated with bleeding events in the 6 months preceding detection.

Conclusion

Integrating MSKUS into hemophilia care as a shared decision-making tool significantly facilitates the early detection of joint damage and supports personalized prophylaxis adjustments, markedly improving patient outcomes.

Outcomes and outcome measures

INTRODUCTION

Advances in haemophilia treatment have resulted in a near-normal life expectancy, lower burden of bleeding and treatment, and improved quality of life in high-income countries. Bleeding rate is approaching zero and novel parameters should be evaluated to assess the efficacy of treatment not only from the clinical point of view by using new methodologies (e.g. joint health assessment), but also from the patient's perspective (e.g. pain, quality of life, treatment satisfaction).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This approach should be aimed at combining objective clinical methodologies and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, some instruments used for assessing PROs are still suboptimal and not properly validated. Recent evidence suggests that these tools can take advantage from a more personalized designed approach and could be effectively improved and serve to facilitate the patient's self-evaluation. For other congenital bleeding disorders (BDs), a set of patient-relevant outcomes has been also defined that overlap substantially those of haemophilia, including bleeding, side effects and complications, and PROs, such as pain, physical functioning, impact on daily life including school and work and mental health. There is a growing focus on addressing women-specific outcomes in BDs, reflecting an increased awareness of the unique challenges faced by women in this context. However, the development of tailored tools is imperative to further advance the progress in managing women with BDs, ensuring more accurate monitoring and personalized care.

CONCLUSIONS

How incorporating these outcome measures in the process of approval of novel treatments for these disorders by regulatory authorities remains to be established.

Hemophilic arthropathy: how to diagnose subclinical bleeding early and how to orthopedically treat a damaged joint

INTRODUCTION

It is important to know the current status of hemophilic arthropathy diagnoses, treatments, complications, and outcomes in developed countries.

AREAS COVERED

A bibliographic search in PubMed for articles published from 1 January 2019 through 12 June 2023 was performed.

EXPERT OPINION

In developed countries with specialized hemophilia treatment centers, primary hematological prophylaxis (started before the age of 2 years and after no more than one joint bleed) has almost completely eliminated the joint-related problems of the disease. The ideal goal of zero hemarthroses can be achieved only with intense and well-dosed prophylaxis: intravenous infusion of coagulation factor - standard half-life or extended half-life; periodic or subcutaneous injections of nonfactor products (emicizumab or fitusiran). However, hemophilic arthropathy continues to occur due to subclinical joint hemorrhages. In one study, 16% of the joints without reported hemarthroses showed signs of previous subclinical bleeding (hemosiderin deposits with/without synovial hypertrophy on magnetic resonance imaging were deemed signs of previous subclinical bleeding), rendering evidence for subclinical bleeding in people with severe hemophilia with lifelong prophylaxis treatment. Subclinical joint hemorrhages can be averted only by employing accurate and tailored prophylaxis.