Identification of hub genes and therapeutic siRNAs to develop novel adjunctive therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Dux Is Dispensable for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: A Study Inspired by a "Red Flagged" Publication and Editorial Oversight

Double homeobox (DUX) genes are key embryonic regulators that are silenced after the early cleavage stages of embryogenesis. Aberrant expression of DUX4 in skeletal muscle is linked to facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). A recent study reported that Dux, the murine ortholog of DUX4, contributes to the dystrophic phenotype in mdx mice, a Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) model, and that its deletion enhances muscle regeneration by reducing oxidative stress. However, convincing evidence of Dux expression in either intact or injured muscle of wild-type (WT) and mdx mice remains lacking, raising questions about its role in muscle homeostasis. To investigate this, we assessed Dux expression in WT and mdx mice and used Dux knockout (DuxΔ/Δ) mice to evaluate its function during regeneration following cardiotoxin (CTX)-induced injury. Contrary to prior reports, Dux was not expressed in either WT or mdx mice. Moreover, Dux deletion did not enhance muscle regeneration or affect the expression of the oxidative stress regulator Nrf2 following CTX injury. Lastly, we confirmed that neither DUX4 nor its target genes were induced in muscle biopsies from DMD patients, excluding a role for DUX4 in DMD pathology. Collectively, our results demonstrate that Dux does not impact skeletal muscle regeneration or DUX4 contribution to the DMD dystrophic phenotype, directly challenging the conclusions of a previously published study. We comment on issues of editorial oversight that led to the publication of that study and highlight the deleterious impact of the growing wave of fraudulent publications.

Muscle-specific increased expression of JAG1 improves skeletal muscle phenotype in dystrophin-deficient mice

Therapeutic strategies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) will likely require complementary approaches. One possibility is to explore genetic modifiers that improve muscle regeneration and function. The beneficial effects of the overexpression of Jagged-1 were described in escaper golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dogs that had a near-normal life and validated in dystrophin-deficient zebrafish (1). To clarify the underlying biology of JAG1 overexpression in dystrophic muscles, we generated a transgenic mouse (mdx5cv-JAG1) model that lacks dystrophin and overexpresses human JAG1 in striated muscles. Skeletal muscles from mdx5cv-JAG1 and mdx5cv mice were studied at one, four, and twelve-month time points. JAG1 expression in mdx5cv-JAG1 increased by three to five times compared to mdx5cv. Consequently, mdx5cv-JAG1 muscles were significantly bigger and stronger than dystrophic controls, along with an increased number of myofibers. Proteomics data show increased dysferlin in mdx5cv-JAG1 muscles and an association of Nsd1 with the phenotype. Our data supports the positive effect of JAG1 overexpression in dystrophic muscles.