Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis treated with immunotherapy

Sarcomatoid renal pelvis carcinoma: A case report

Sarcomatoid carcinoma is a malignant tumor of epithelial origin, some of the cells of which are differentiated in a sarcomatoid direction and are highly invasive. Sarcomatoid renal pelvis carcinoma (SRPC) is very rare. This article reports on an elderly woman with SRPC and discusses the clinical and pathological features and prognosis of SRPC in the hope of providing a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Challenges in diagnosing and managing sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a case report

Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis is an extremely rare malignant tumor with a high risk of recurrence and metastasis and a poor prognosis. This case reports a 61-year-old male patient with renal pelvic sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma who developed extensive lymph node metastasis 26 days after posterior laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma, and the patient died on the 45th postoperative day, with the cause of death being advanced malignancy of the tumor. This case highlights the rapid progression of sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma, and sarcomatoid variants should be identified as early as possible, with active multidisciplinary adjuvant therapy and closer follow-up when feasible. Retrospective analysis of this patient's treatment regimen and admission provides lessons for recognizing and aggressively managing this rare and fatal variant of urothelial carcinoma.

Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Variant Histology Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Following Radical Nephroureterectomy: Stabilized Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis of Single Center Experience

PURPOSE

The study aimed to investigate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with histologic variants of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (VUTUC) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 131 VUTUC patients' medical records, from a pool of 368 non-metastatic localized or locally advanced UTUC cases, treated at a single tertiary referral center between January 2011 and January 2021. The intervention was adjuvant chemotherapy administration post-RNU. TTR and OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression, covariates adjusted for age, postoperative GFR, history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, T and N stage with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW).

RESULTS

The application of adjuvant chemotherapy showed a significant extension in TTR (P = .01), but no substantial impact on OS (P = .19) after sIPTW adjustment for covariates. Multivariate analysis revealed adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion as significant prognostic factors for TTR. In contrast, only tumor size and perineural invasion were significant for OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduced the progression risk in certain VUTUC subtypes (squamous or glandular/micropapillary), but not in sarcomatoid variants.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy appears to improve TTR, albeit without a significant effect on OS, in nonmetastatic localized and locally advanced VUTUC patients post-RNU. While beneficial to some VUTUC subtypes, it did not yield significant advantages for sarcomatoid variants. Despite adjustments for known confounders, the study's findings may be subject to potential selection bias and unmeasured confounding factors.

Sintilimab combined with anlotinib as first-line treatment for advanced sarcomatoid carcinoma of head and neck: a case report and literature review

Sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) is a rare, complex, aggressive tumor that spreads rapidly, is highly malignant, and has metastasized. Surgical resection is the primary treatment, and it usually occurs in the lungs and kidneys but rarely in the neck. Patients with advanced sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) of the head and neck (HN) have a poor progonsis. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been established as treatments for many solid tumors; however, the effectiveness of ICIs in treating SC of HN is still little recognized. We report a case study of a middle-aged woman with primary sarcomatoid carcinoma of the neck. She developed sarcomatoid carcinoma of the contralateral neck 7 months after the first surgical treatment. Subsequently, disease recurrence and metastasis occurred 8 months after the second surgery. The patient did not receive any treatment after both surgeries. The tumor showed high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, with a combined positive score (CPS): 95. The patient's response to treatment was assessed as partial remission (PR) after 2 cycles of anlotinib combined with sintilimab. The patient has survived for over 2 years and remains in PR status, despite experiencing grade 2 hypothyroidism as an adverse event during treatment. The case highlights the efficacy and safety of anlotinib and sintilimab as a first-line treatment.

The prognostic significance of histologic variant on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

While the treatment guidelines have been established for pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC), patients with variant type urothelial carcinoma (vUC) face limited effective treatment options. The effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with vUC remains uncertain and necessitates additional research.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study to explore the effectiveness of ICI in patients with pUC or vUC in Taiwan. We evaluated the overall response rate (ORR) through univariate logistic regression analysis and examined the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Additionally, we employed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the data.

RESULT

A total of 142 patients (116 pUC, 26 vUC) were included in our final analysis. The ORR was marginally higher in patients with pUC compared to those with vUC (34.5% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.26). Among all patients, 12.9% with pUC achieved a complete response (CR) after ICI treatment, while no vUC cases achieved CR (p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in PFS (median 3.6 months vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.34) or OS (median 16.3 months vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.24) when comparing patients with pUC or vUC. In the subgroup analysis, patients with pUC who underwent first-line ICI treatment exhibited significantly improved OS compared to those with vUC (24.6 months vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The use of ICI as monotherapy is a feasible and effective treatment approach for patients with metastatic vUC.