Periodontal soft tissue increase induced by periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics surgery

Changes in alveolar bone remodeling after maxillary anterior retraction using fixed appliances with different periodontal conditions: A retrospective study based on cone-beam computed tomography

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare changes in maxillary anterior alveolar bone remodeling and complication rates in adult patients with different periodontal conditions after maxillary anterior tooth retraction using fixed appliances. In addition, this study analyzed potential factors affecting alveolar bone thickness in patients with periodontitis.

METHODS

A total of 55 adult patients (mean age, 23.53 ± 4.55 years) with Angle Class I or II Division 1 malocclusion with maxillary protrusion were recruited and categorized into the healthy control group (n = 23), stage I periodontitis (P-I) group (n = 17), and stage II periodontitis (P-II) group (n = 15). The maxillary anterior teeth were retracted using a fixed appliance. Cone-beam computed tomography was used to measure the thickness, height, and density of the alveolar bone in the maxillary anterior region before (T1) and after (T2) treatment. The incidences of bone dehiscence and fenestration were documented. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate intergroup and intragroup differences. Clinical and cephalometric data were collected to identify factors affecting the changes in alveolar bone thickness using multivariate linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The labial alveolar bone thickness increased significantly after treatment in all groups, but no differences were observed among the groups. In contrast, the palatal alveolar bone thickness decreased, particularly in the P-I and P-II groups, at the midroot and apical levels (P <0.05). A significant decrease in alveolar bone height was observed in the P-I and P-II groups (P <0.05). The incidence of palatal bone dehiscence was higher in the P-II (84.44%) and P-I (69.61%) groups. Multivariate linear regression analyses revealed that sex, treatment duration, periodontal treatment, changes in tooth inclination, and initial thickness significantly affected palatal alveolar bone thickness changes in patients with periodontitis.

CONCLUSIONS

After retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth with a fixed appliance, the labial alveolar bone of the maxillary anterior teeth thickened, whereas the palatal bone exhibited thinning in adults with periodontitis. The reduction in palatal bone height was more significant in this population than in healthy subjects, along with a higher incidence of palatal bone dehiscence. Bone morphology must be carefully assessed, considering these relevant factors before and during orthodontic treatment.

Biomechanical and Biological Multidisciplinary Strategies in the Orthodontic Treatment of Patients with Periodontal Diseases: A Review of the Literature

Orthodontic treatment aims to correct malocclusions and ensure the overall health and stability of the periodontium. The relationship between orthodontic therapy and periodontal health is intricate and multifaceted, and a comprehensive approach is often required to achieve optimal outcomes. Firstly, this article delves into the impact of orthodontic mechanics on periodontal tissues, emphasizing the importance of minimizing iatrogenic effects such as root resorption and gingival recession. Understanding the biomechanical principles allows for the development of treatment plans that mitigate these risks while achieving the desired tooth movement. Effective communication and coordinated treatment protocols are essential for managing periodontal issues before, during, and after orthodontic intervention. To optimize outcomes, periodontal considerations such as gingival biotype, attachment levels, and bone support must be integrated into treatment planning. Additionally, adjunctive periodontal therapies such as selective alveolar decortication and regenerative procedures are explored as valuable tools to enhance periodontal support and optimize treatment outcomes. This narrative review explores strategies to attain periodontal goals in orthodontic patients, thereby facilitating successful treatment. Furthermore, the review examines the role of interdisciplinary collaborations between orthodontists and periodontists. In conclusion, achieving periodontal goals in orthodontic patients requires a comprehensive approach that addresses biomechanical principles, interdisciplinary collaboration, patient education, and adjunctive periodontal therapies. By integrating periodontal considerations into orthodontic treatment planning and execution, clinicians can ensure straight teeth and a healthy and stable periodontium, ultimately leading to successful treatment outcomes and long-term oral health.

Treatment of Localized Gingival Recession with an Enamel Matrix Protein-Coated Xenogeneic Dermal Matrix: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to evaluate the influence of the additional use of enamel matrix derivate (EMD) in the treatment of gingival recession defects using a coronally advanced flap (CAF) and a xenogeneic dermal matrix (XDM) by means of digital and clinical assessment methods. In this prospective randomized controlled study, recession height and area, width and thickness of keratinized gingiva, pocket probing depth, and clinical attachment levels were measured at the baseline and followed up for one year. Fifteen patients (n = 15) with 24 gingival recession defects were treated between 2019 and 2021. On average, the digitally assessed root coverage of the control group (CAF + XDM) was not significantly different compared to the test group (CAF + XDM + EMD), with 69 ± 28% and 36 ± 32%, respectively (p = 0.094). One year postoperatively, there were no differences found regarding keratinized tissue width (KTW) between the control group and test group (p = 0.690). However, the control group showed superior results in the thickness of keratinized gingiva (p = 0.044). The present study showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the root coverage results in the CAF + XDM + EMD group compared to the CAF + XDM group. The adjunctive use of EMD to a CAF and XDM in the treatment of gingival recession defects does not appear to have any clinical benefit.

A nomogram prediction of gingival recession in mandibular incisors of orthodontic-orthognathic treated skeletal class III malocclusion with or without PAOO: A retrospective cohort study

Background

To assess the alterations in gingival thickness and the occurrence gingival recession subsequent to orthodontic-orthognathic treatment of mandibular incisors in skeletal Class III and identify risk factors associated with gingival recession.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 33 patients exhibiting skeletal Class III malocclusion, totaling 131 mandibular incisors, who were undergoing orthodontic- orthognathic treatment that did not involve extraction of mandibular teeth. The subjects were categorized into surgery group (S; n = 17; ANB = -5.55 ± 3.26; IOFTN = 4.60 ± 0.51, scores ranging: 4.3-5.3) and non-surgery group (NS; n = 16; ANB = -3.00 ± 4.08; IOFTN = 4.63 ± 0.50, scores ranging: 4.3-5.4), based on if they had history of Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics surgery (S) or not (NS). Patients in S group received orthognathic surgery about 1-1.5 years after Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics surgery. Alterations in gingival thickness, gingival recession, and keratinized gingival width were compared before and after orthodontic-orthognathic treatment. Logistic regression analysis was used to construct a gingival recession prediction model and draw nomograms.

Results

After orthodontic-orthognathic treatment, the gingival thickness and keratinized gingival width in NS group decreased by 0.15 ± 0.21 mm and 0.74 ± 0.91 mm, whereas those in the S group increased by 0.32 ± 0.28 mm and 2.09 ± 1.51 mm (P < 0.05). After orthodontic-orthognathic, the percentage of gingival recession increased by 47.62 % in NS group, which was 14.77 times that of S group (P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that skeletal Class III patients with a gingival thickness below 0.72 mm, an alveolar bone height exceeding 2.36 mm, and an alveolar bone thickness under 0.45 mm might be at elevated risk for developing gingival recession following orthodontic - orthognathic therapy.

Conclusions

Drawing on the findings of our investigation, we concluded the risk of gingival recession of mandibular anterior teeth increased after orthodontic-orthognathic treatment in skeletal Class III, whereas Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics surgery could significantly improve the periodontal phenotype and prevent gingival recession.

Combined Periodontal-Orthodontic Treatment with Periodontal Corticotomy Regenerative Surgery in an Adult Patient Suffering from Periodontitis and Skeletal Class II Malocclusion: A Case Report with 5-Year Longitudinal Observation

A thick periodontal phenotype with thick gingiva and alveolar bone volume is required for safe orthodontic tooth movement and long-term stability. A high incidence of dehiscence and fenestration in the labial aspect of mandibular anterior teeth may limit the correction of deformity and orthodontic treatment, especially when the lower anterior teeth are needed to have a large range of movement. This study reports a combination of periodontal therapy and orthodontic therapy with periodontal corticotomy regenerative surgery (PCRS) in a 25-year-old patient suffering from skeletal Class II malocclusion and periodontitis. The patient received periodontal therapy 5 years ago and commenced orthodontic treatment 4.5 years ago. During the 4 years of follow-up for PCRS, the clinical and radiographic evaluations revealed significant improvements in the periodontal phenotype of the mandibular anterior region. The periodontal phenotypes in the mandibular incisors region were all modified from thin to thick. Supplementing orthodontic treatment with labial PCRS could be a promising treatment strategy to maintain long-term periodontal health in adult patients with alveolar deficiency and thin gingiva tissue.

Difference in Buccal Gingival Thickness between the Mandible and Maxilla in the Aesthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Fragile gingival tissue is a risk factor for the development of gingival recessions. Despite the fact that gingival recessions are more commonly seen around anterior mandibular teeth, previous research has predominantly concentrated on the gingival dimensions in the anterior maxilla. The objective was to systematically compare buccal gingival thicknesses between the upper and lower jaws in individuals with healthy gingival conditions in the aesthetic zone. Methods: A comprehensive search of three databases was carried out until October 2023. Gingival thickness differences between the maxilla and mandible were evaluated by calculating the mean differences along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the measurement area, measurement method, and tooth category. Results: A total of seventeen studies were included in this systematic review. Eleven studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Quantitative analysis comparing gingival thickness around 2100 teeth in the anterior mandible to 2056 teeth in the anterior maxilla revealed a statistically significant thinner buccal gingiva in the mandible (mean difference: 0.16 mm; 95% CI [-0.24, -0.07]; p = 0.0003). Conclusions: The present systematic review revealed a more delicate buccal gingiva in the anterior mandible. However, further scientific validation is required due to the considerable heterogeneity in study design and the potential presence of confounding variables.

The efficacy and safety of corticotomy and periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontic interventions in tooth movement: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The surgically facilitated orthodontic strategy has been a promising strategy for orthodontic treatment recently. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted to assess the available scientific evidence regarding the clinical outcomes, including the potential detrimental effects associated with these surgical procedures, with the aim of providing much more evidence-based information for clinical practice.

METHODS

An electronic search of three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) and a manual search of relevant articles published up to May 2023 were carried out. Clinical trials (≥ 10 subjects) that utilized surgically facilitated orthodontic strategies with clinical and/or radiographic outcomes were included. Meta-analyses and sub-group analyses were performed to analyze the standardized mean difference (SMD) or weighted mean difference (WMD), and confidence interval (CI) for the recorded variables.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies published from Oct 2012 to May 2023 met the inclusion criteria. Based on the analysis outcomes, corticotomy treatment significantly decreased the alignment duration (WMD: -1.08 months; 95% CI = -1.65, -0.51 months, P = 0.0002), and accelerated the canine movement (WMD: 0.72 mm; 95% CI = 0.63, 0.81 mm, P < 0.00001) compared to the traditional orthodontic group. The periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontic (PAOO) strategy markedly reduced the total treatment duration (SMD: -1.98; 95% CI = -2.59, -1.37, P < 0.00001) and increased the bone thickness (SMD:1.07; 95% CI = 0.74, 1.41, P < 0.00001) compared to traditional orthodontic treatment.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that facilitated orthodontic treatment in terms of corticotomy and PAOO strategy may represent attractive and effective therapeutic strategy for orthodontic patients.