The Japan hospice and palliative evaluation study 4: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey

Medical communication at end-of-life in palliative care units: nationwide bereavement family survey

OBJECTIVES

Communicating prognosis and changes in a patient's condition is essential in patient-centred care. However, little is known about how families experience medical communication during the dying phase. This study aimed to evaluate family members' satisfaction with such communication, identify factors associated with dissatisfaction and explore preferred approaches by healthcare professionals.

METHODS

A nationwide survey was conducted among bereaved family members of cancer patients who had died in inpatient palliative care units in Japan. The survey collected data on family characteristics, prebereavement conditions and satisfaction with medical communication during the dying phase, rated on a 3-point scale. Preferences regarding healthcare professionals' communication styles and the timing of postdeath discussions were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 527 respondents (response rate: 53%), only 8% reported dissatisfaction with medical communication. Factors associated with dissatisfaction included older age, female sex, poor mental health and higher household income. Families favoured clear and direct communication over indirect approaches and valued receiving information from both physicians and nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

While most bereaved families were satisfied with medical communication, certain factors contributed to dissatisfaction. Enhancing end-of-life care requires collaboration between physicians and nurses to provide clear information, emotional support and tailored, patient-centred communication.

Impact of Diagnosis Nondisclosure on Quality of Dying in Cancer Patients: A Bereavement Study

CONTEXT

Patients should be optimally informed about their illness for patients' autonomy and shared decision-making. However, diagnosis nondisclosure to patients is traditionally widespread in Japanese culture with family-oriented autonomy. There is insufficient research on quality of death (QOD) and quality of care (QOC) among patients who are not told their diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the impact of diagnosis nondisclosure on QOD and QOC in cancer patients.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional, nationwide mortality follow-back survey. The bereaved families responded to the questionnaire. Measurements included decedents' QOC, QOD, and bereaved families' outcomes. After using the propensity score matching method based on the covariates which can affect nondisclosure actions to compare the "disclosure" group and "nondisclosure" group, we compared differences in QOC, QOD, and bereaved families' outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 110,990 family members who were sent the questionnaires, we finally analyzed 46,672 responses. The disclosure group and nondisclosure group included 42,300 (90.6%) and 4,372 (9.4%) decedents, respectively. Most of the QOD domains (14/18) showed significantly higher scores in the disclosure group compared with the nondisclosure group. In terms of QOC domains, all domains showed higher scores in the disclosure group. Respondents in the disclosure group reported higher overall care satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that overall QOD and QOC in decedents with cancer were significantly higher in decedents with explicit cancer diagnoses. Furthermore, bereaved family members' outcomes were better among the family members of decedents with an explicit cancer diagnosis.

Identification of unmet information needs among families of critically ill patients and their association with post-intensive care syndrome-family: protocol for a single-center cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Families of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) need a variety of information about the patient. Meeting these information needs improves the quality of communication between the family and ICU staff, as well as reduces the risk of post-intensive care syndrome-family (PICS-F). However, information needs continue to be unmet, and information regarding which specific information needs are met or unmet is insufficient. Additionally, the unmet needs that affect PICS-F are unknown. Therefore, this study aims to identify the unmet information needs of families of patients admitted to the ICU in terms of communication with ICU staff and determine their association with PICS-F.

METHODS

This study will be a single-center cross-sectional study using a questionnaire survey. The participants will include family members of patients admitted to the emergency ICU of the Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital in Japan. Eligibility for participation will be assessed from medical records, and family members of patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be identified and sent a questionnaire. PICS-F and unmet information needs will be assessed 1 to 12 months after patients leave the ICU. PICS-F assessment will include the evaluation of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and prolonged grief disorder. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses will be used to examine the association between PICS-F and unmet information needs.

DISCUSSION

This study will fill a research gap in communication between ICU staff and families of ICU patients by examining the information that tends not to be provided or understood by families, thereby providing an understanding of the information that is likely to be an unmet information need. Additionally, this study can contribute to the development of future communication strategies by investigating which unmet information needs are associated with PICS-F risk, thus emphasizing the information needs that should be given priority when developing effective communication strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Center Clinical Trials Registry UMIN 000053813.

Development of the Home Hospice Nursing Care Scale to Support End-of-Life Patients With Cancer and Evaluation of its Reliability and Validity

This study aimed to develop the "Home Hospice Nursing Care Scale" to assess the care provided by visiting nurses to patients with end-stage cancer and evaluate its reliability and validity. A draft of the scale was created based on a descriptive survey conducted among oncology nurse specialists and certified oncology nurses working as home-visit nurses. A questionnaire survey was administered to 1,770 home-visit nurses working at 296 functionally strengthening home-visit nursing establishments. A total of 436 valid responses were obtained (valid response rate: 24.6%). Exploratory factor analysis identified 5 factors comprising 40 items: care that supports the values of the patient and their family members, partnership involving the patient and their family members to maintain home care, care that allows for living with loved ones until end of life, care that supports the daily lives of family caregivers, and care that reconciles the feelings of those involved. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the goodness-of-fit indices of the model were as follows: GFI = 0.846, AGFI = 0.828, CFI = 0.915, and RMSEA = 0.050. Cronbach's α coefficients ranged from 0.77 to 0.93. Criterion-related validity was verified by the Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes towards Terminal Home Care Scale and Difficulties with Home Palliative Cancer Care Scale. The reliability and validity of the scale was verified, which demonstrates its utility. Future challenges include analyzing factors related to home hospice nursing care and developing an educational program based on the future study. Key words: home hospice, end-of-life, cancer, nursing, scale development, reliability, validity.

Associations Between Anticipatory Grief and Post-Bereavement Depression and Post-Loss Grief of Family Members of Dying Patients With Cancer in Palliative Care Units: A Cohort Study

Objectives: Anticipatory grief is associated with post-bereavement grief; however, reports on the influence of pre-loss depression are limited. Therefore, we investigated the association between the anticipatory grief of family members and post-loss and post-depression grief adjusted for pre-loss depression. Methods: This cohort study included the family members of dying patients with cancer. Questionnaires were distributed to them during hospitalization in four inpatient palliative care units from 2016 to 2017. We also administered follow-up questionnaires after their bereavement in 2018. The pre-bereavement questionnaire consisted of three items from the Anticipatory Grief Scale for Families Caring for a Terminally Ill Person for assessing anticipated grief and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 for assessing depression. The Brief Grief Questionnaire was used to assess post-loss grief. Results: We distributed 181 pre-bereavement questionnaires to the family members; 112 (62%) responded to the pre-bereavement survey, out of which 71 (63%) responded to the post-bereavement survey. Anticipatory grief was significantly associated with pre-loss (ρ = 0.37, ρ < 0.001) and post-loss (ρ = 0.24, P = 0.009) depression and marginally associated with post-loss grief (ρ = 0.15, P = 0.10). Pre-loss depression was also significantly associated with post-loss depression (ρ = 0.50, P < 0.001) and post-loss grief (ρ = 0.41, P < 0.001). However, anticipatory grief was not significantly associated with post-loss depression (P = 0.35) and post-loss grief (P = 0.65) after adjusting for pre-loss depression. Significance of Results: Bereaved families who experienced anticipatory grief had worse post-bereavement depression. However, this association was not statistically significant after adjusting for pre-bereavement depression. Post-bereavement depression may be in a continuum with pre-loss depression, and anticipatory grief does not independently affect post-loss reactions.

Social factors affecting home-based end-of-life care for patients with cancer and primary caregivers

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the social factors of patients and caregivers, including those related to their wishes for home-based end-of-life care that influence its fulfillment.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted using the dataset (home-based end-of-life care N = 625, hospital end-of-life care N = 7603) Comprehensive patient-based survey conducted by The Study on Quality Evaluation of Hospice and Palliative Care by Bereaved Caregivers (J-HOPE 4) and multivariate analysis (multiple logistic regression) to explore the impact of social factors of patients and caregivers on the fulfillment of home-based end-of-life care. The explanatory variables included 11 social factors of patients, such as age and sex, and 18 social factors of primary caregivers.

RESULTS

For patients with medical expenses less than 900 USD (OR, 2.05), annual income of fewer than 36,000 USD (OR 0.669), preferences for home care (OR 1.49), preferences to die at home (OR 1.58), wish to die at home (OR 1.52), and lack of patient's financial well-being (OR 0.72) were significant factors associated with home-based end-of-life care. Significant factors relating to caregivers included male caregivers (OR 0.66), poor mental state (OR 0.79), ability to provide daily care (OR 3.02), experience of caring for a deceased family member (OR 0.66), presence of alternative caregivers (OR 0.78), and cohabitation with caregivers (OR 1.47).

CONCLUSION

Patient preferences, social situations, primary caregivers' social situations, and mental states influenced home-based end-of-life care.

Protocol of a nation-wide post-bereavement survey on quality of hospice and palliative care: J-HOPE 5 study

BACKGROUND

Maintaining quality of care and improving the quality of life (QOL) of patients and their families are important issues in palliative care. Therefore, there is a need to continuously evaluate the quality and outcomes of the care provided. In Japan, the Japan hospice and palliative evaluation (J-HOPE) study series has been conducted every three to four years since 2010, and we will conduct the fifth J-HOPE study (J-HOPE5). In the present paper, we describe the protocol of the J-HOPE5 study. The main objectives are: (1) to evaluate the processes, structures and outcomes of care at hospices or palliative care units; (2) to examine bereaved family members' self-reported psychosocial condition, such as grief and depression as bereavement outcomes; (3) to provide data to ensure and improve the quality of care provided by participating institutions via feedback based on the results from each institution; and (4) to provide clinical and academic information regarding the implications of various issues in palliative care by conducting specific research.

METHODS

We will conduct a cross-sectional, anonymous, self-reported questionnaire survey. In total, 153 institutions have agreed to participate in this study, meaning that approximately 12,240 bereaved family members (n = 80/institution) will be sent a questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

This is one of the largest cross-sectional bereavement surveys to evaluate the quality of specialized palliative care for patients with cancer, both in Japan and worldwide. The large sample size of this study will enable wide analyses of specific targets and topics.

Unapproved and unproven cancer treatments in patients admitted to palliative care units

PURPOSE

To clarify the current use of unapproved and unproven cancer treatment (UUCT) among the bereaved families of patients with cancer who died in palliative care units, the financial burden and psychological experiences of the families, and the relationship between patients in palliative care who used UUCT and communication with their physicians'.

METHODS

This study was conducted as part of a cross-sectional, anonymous nationwide survey of the bereaved family members of cancer patients who died in palliative care unit in Japan.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were sent to 1,039 bereaved family members, and responses were received from 661 (64%). Of these, 558 were included in the study after excluding the 103 who did not complete the questionnaire. A total of 7.3% (41 of 558) of patients received UUCT. Of these, 34% (14 of 41) of patients were informed that the treatment was in the research phase, and 49% (20 of 41) were informed that the efficacy of the treatment was unknown. Regarding expectations for UUCT, 61% (25/41) expected to be cured, and 80% (33/41) expected it to slow disease progression. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) was associated with receiving UUCT (p = 0.024), and patients who could discuss CAM with their doctors tended to receive UUCT (p = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

Patients in palliative care unit who expect to cure tended to receive UUCT. These results highlight the challenge of telling patients that UUCT is ineffective and informing them of their prognosis and severe medical conditions.

Continuous Electrocardiographic Monitoring for 24 Hours Before Death in Patients with Terminal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Purposeless physiological monitoring at the end-of-life is not recommended. However, studies on how families feel regarding the death of patients with terminal cancer without continuous electrocardiographic monitoring (CEM) are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the impact on the quality of care and the feelings and psychological distress experienced by families when CEM is not used during the 24 hours preceding a patient's death.

METHODS

In this multicenter cross-sectional, self-report questionnaires were distributed to 1087 bereaved families at Japanese specialized palliative care units in 2018.

RESULTS

Out of 671 responses, 394 valid responses were analyzed. Families of nonmonitored patients (NM-group) accounted for 79.2%, while those with bedside electrocardiogram monitoring (MB-group) and remote nurse station monitoring (MC-group) comprised 11.9% and 8.9%, respectively. In the NM-group, 85.5% expressed satisfaction without CEM, which was more than 10% lower than other groups. While 14% in the NM-group desired patient monitoring, families who received adequate explanations about CEM had lower proportions compared to the MB-group (P = .021). Univariate analyses showed no significant differences in evaluations of the quality of care and families' psychological distress (mean scores of Overall Care Satisfaction, Care Evaluation Scale, Good Death Inventory, Brief Grief Questionnaires) across all groups.

CONCLUSION

While the majority of NM-group were satisfied with their patient's care without CEM, the proportion of dissatisfied families was higher than in other groups. Although not using CEM is not a major hindrance to end-of-life care for patients with terminal cancer, providing sufficient explanations may be important for satisfactory care.

Dying Patients' Quality of Care for Five Common Causes of Death: A Nationwide Mortality Follow-Back Survey

Background: The importance of high-quality care for terminal patients is being increasingly recognized; however, quality of care (QOC) and quality of death and dying (QOD) for noncancer patients remain unclear. Objectives: To clarify QOC and QOD according to places and causes of death. Design, Subjects: A nationwide mortality follow-back survey was conducted using death certificate data for cancer, heart disease, stroke syndrome, pneumonia, and kidney failure in Japan. The questionnaire was distributed to 115,816 bereaved family members between February 2019 and February 2020. Measurements included QOC, QOD, and symptoms during the last week of life. Analyses used generalized estimating equations adjusting for age, sex, and region. Results: Valid responses were returned by 62,576 (54.0%). Family-reported QOC and QOD by the place of death were significantly higher at home than in other places across all causes of death (for all combinations with hospital p < 0.01). In stroke syndrome and pneumonia, QOD significantly differed between hospital and home (stroke syndrome: 57.1 vs. 72.4, p < 0.001, effect size 0.77; pneumonia: 57.3 vs. 71.1, p < 0.001, effect size 0.78). No significant differences were observed in QOC and QOD between cancer and noncancer. The prevalence of symptoms was higher for cancer than for other causes of death. Conclusions: QOC and QOD were higher at home than in other places of death across all causes of death. The further expansion of end-of-life care options is crucial for improving QOC and QOD for all terminal patients.

Good Death and Quality of End-of-Life Care in Patients with Coexisting Cancer and Dementia: Perspective of Bereaved Families

Background

Patients with coexisting cancer and dementia often have complex health care needs and face challenges in achieving a good death.

Objectives

To evaluate good death achievement and end-of-life (EOL) care in patients with coexisting cancer and dementia from the perspective of bereaved families.

Design

Cross-sectional nationwide postal survey.

Setting/Subjects

Bereaved families of patients with cancer who died in hospice and palliative care units across Japan.

Measurements

Bereaved families completed an anonymous, self-reported questionnaire. Their perspective on achieving a good death was assessed using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) (total score: 18-126). The Revised Care Evaluation Scale-short version (CES2) was used to assess EOL care (total score: 10-60). We examined the Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) (total score: 0-10) and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9) (total score: 0-27).

Results

Data from 670 participants were analyzed, including 83 (12.4%) bereaved families of patients with coexisting cancer and dementia. No statistical differences were observed in the total GDI score for 18 items (dementia comorbidity vs. nondementia comorbidity groups, mean ± standard deviation, respectively, 78.4 ± 17.7 vs. 80.0 ± 15.5, adjusted [adj] P = 0.186), CES2 score (49.70 ± 9.22 vs. 48.82 ± 8.40, adj P = 0.316), BGQ score (3.40 ± 2.41 vs. 4.36 ± 2.28, adj P = 0.060), and PHQ9 score (4.67 ± 4.71 vs. 5.50 ± 5.37, adj P = 0.788).

Conclusions

GDI, CES2, BGQ, and PHQ9 scores did not differ significantly between groups, regardless of the presence of dementia in hospice and palliative care units. Patients with coexisting cancer and dementia can achieve a good death by high-quality EOL care.

Preferences of bereaved family members on communication with physicians when discontinuing anticancer treatment: referring to the concept of nudges

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify the situation and evaluate the communication on anticancer treatment discontinuation from the viewpoint of a bereaved family, in reference to the concept of nudges.

METHODS

A multi-center questionnaire survey was conducted involving 350 bereaved families of patients with cancer admitted to palliative care units in Japan.

RESULTS

The following explanations were rated as essential or very useful: (i) treatment would be a physical burden to the patient (42.9%), (ii) providing anticancer treatment was impossible (40.5%), (iii) specific disadvantages of receiving treatment (40.5%), (iv) not receiving treatment would be better for the patient (39.9%) and (v) specific advantages of not receiving treatment (39.6%). The factors associated with a high need for improvement of the physician's explanation included lack of explanation on specific advantages of not receiving treatment (β = 0.228, P = 0.001), and lack of explanation of 'If the patient's condition improves, you may consider receiving the treatment again at that time.' (β = 0.189, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Explaining the disadvantages of receiving treatment and the advantages of not receiving treatment, and presenting treatment discontinuation as the default option were effective in helping patients' families in making the decision to discontinue treatment. In particular, explanation regarding specific advantages of not receiving treatment was considered useful, as they caused a lower need for improvement of the physicians' explanation.

Need for Improvement in Death Pronouncements in Palliative Care Units

Background

Death pronouncement is an important moment that can impact a family's bereavement process; however, necessary improvements in physicians' behavior during death pronouncement remain unclear.

Objectives

To explore whether the lack of certain behaviors by the physician was associated with a perceived need for improving death pronouncement for advanced cancer patients in palliative care units (PCUs).

Methods

This study was a secondary analysis of a nationwide multicenter questionnaire survey conducted in 2018 that targeted bereaved family members of cancer patients who died in PCUs. We performed univariate analysis to investigate the need to improve behavior toward death pronouncement. We performed bivariate analysis to investigate the relationship among the need for improvement in behavior toward death pronouncement, physician attribution (primary responsible physician, a member of the same team, and another physician), and nine specific behaviors.

Results

Four hundred twenty-two questionnaires (64.2%) were returned. We analyzed 356 responses and found that 32.5% perceived the need to improve death pronouncement. Lack of certain behaviors at death pronouncement, especially not explicitly explaining the cause of death to family members (odds ratio: 11.89, p < 0.001), were positively associated with the need for improvement. There were significant differences among the types of physician attribution regarding the need for improvement (primary responsible physician vs. a member of the same team vs. another physician [15.1% vs. 42.6% vs. 45.7%, p < 0.001]).

Conclusion

There was a significant positive association between the lack of certain behaviors toward death pronouncement and the need for improvement. The major lack of behavior toward death pronouncement was not explicitly explaining the cause of death to family members and not calling out to the patient before beginning the patient's examination.

The Impact of Stressful Life Events after Bereavement: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey

CONTEXT

Bereaved family members sometimes experience distress due to stressful life events. However, the effects of this distress on depression and grief remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the degree of distress due to postbereavement stressful life events, its associated factors, especially social isolation, and its effects on major depressive disorder (MDD) and complicated grief (CG) risks among bereaved family members of patients with cancer.

METHODS

This cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in 2018 as part of the J-HOPE4 study. We recruited 1740 bereaved family members of patients with cancer who died from July to August of 2018. We assessed distress due to postbereavement stressful life events with the Bereavement Secondary Stressor Scale, social isolation with the Lubben Social Network Scale Short-Form, and the MDD and CG risk with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Brief Grief Questionnaire, respectively.

RESULTS

Among the 913 (52.5%) respondents, 88%, 57%, 46%, 28%, and 19% experienced distress due to incidental tasks, daily life difficulties, financial problems, problems with other people, and deterioration of family relationships, respectively. More distress was associated with higher risks of MDD (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, P < 0.01) and CG (OR = 2.5, P < 0.01). Social isolation and specific backgrounds were associated with more distress in response to stressful life events.

CONCLUSION

Most family members experienced distress due to stressful life events, which were risk factors for MDD and CG. Assessing risk factors for maladaptation to post-bereavement life changes and enhancing readiness to adapt to them is important.

Dying, death and bereavement: developing a national survey of bereaved relatives

BACKGROUND

Assessing and measuring the experience and quality of care provided is central to the improvement of care delivery of all healthcare systems. This paper reports on the development of a survey instrument to capture the experiences of care at end of life from the perspective of bereaved relatives in the Republic of Ireland.

METHODS

A multi-method, multi-stakeholder, sequential approach was adopted for this study. Items for inclusion in the survey instrument bank were identified through (1) a feasibility study and scoping literature review, (2) expert panel programme board review, (3) focus groups and (4) gap analysis. The following steps were undertaken to prioritise the items for inclusion in the final survey instrument: (1) a Delphi study (2) technical expert panel review (3) cognitive interviews with bereaved relatives and an (4) expert panel programme board review.

RESULTS

Following an iterative process with key stakeholders, a survey instrument was developed with sections focusing on the provision of care at home, in the last nursing home / residential care facility, hospice and hospital, as well as care experience in the last 2 days of life, the relative's experiences of care and support, the circumstances of care surrounding death and demographic information. In total, a bank of 123 questions were prioritised to be included in the National End of Life Survey instrument.

CONCLUSION

The survey will provide a standardised national approach to capturing the experience of care of those who have died, from the perspective of bereaved relatives in the Republic of Ireland. This will allow health service providers, policy makers and regulators to gather important insights into the experiences of care at end of life and will help fulfil the requirement of healthcare services to ensure they are providing high-quality care.

Factors related to suicidal ideation among bereaved family members of patients with cancer: Results from a nationwide bereavement survey in Japan

BACKGROUND

Bereaved family members are known to have a higher risk of suicide, although relevant research is lacking. We aimed to clarify the percentage of bereaved family members of patients with cancer who experience suicidal ideation and the associated factors.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of two cross-sectional nationwide bereavement surveys in Japan, analyzing data from a total of 17,237 bereaved family members of patients with cancer. The Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) and Item 9 of the PHQ-9 were used to assess depression (PHQ-8 score ≥10) and suicidal ideation, respectively. We assessed items such as socio-demographic data, complicated grief (CG), preparedness for bereavement, and perceived social support. Logistic regression analysis was used to reveal factors related to suicidal ideation.

RESULTS

Overall, 11 % of subjects reported some amount of suicidal ideation in the previous two weeks, with a suicidal ideation rate as high as 42 % among those with a higher risk of depression. Significant associations (all p < 0.0001) were found between suicidal ideation and the family member's depressive state (OR: 10.01), poor physical health status during caregiving (OR: 1.24), poor psychological health status during caregiving (OR: 1.38) pre-existing mental illness (OR: 1.38), insufficient preparedness for bereavement (OR: 0.59), and poor perceived social support (OR: 1.42).

LIMITATIONS

The respondents were limited to family members of patients with cancer in Japan, and the study involved cross-sectional self-reported data.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should identify bereaved family members at a high risk of suicide by carefully assessing these risk factors identified in the present study.

Comparative study of clinicians' and family members' perceptions of patients' end-of-life experiences

OBJECTIVE

End-of-life experiences (ELEs), such as deathbed visions (DBVs), have been reported worldwide. However, ELEs have rarely been discussed in clinical practice, possibly because of the different perceptions of ELEs among clinicians and families. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the differences in perception regarding ELEs, especially DBVs, between clinicians and families.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, prospective and observational study with patients with cancer. After the patients' death, clinicians recorded their perceptions of patients' ELEs during the palliative care unit admission, and bereaved families responded to a questionnaire about ELEs. The primary outcome was the frequency and concordance of DBVs from the perspective of bereaved family members and clinicians. The second outcome was each group's frequency of terminal lucidity and terminal coincidence.

RESULTS

The study included 443 patients. DBVs were reported more frequently by family members than clinicians (14.0% vs 2.7%, p<0.001). Among family members, terminal lucidity and terminal coincidence were observed at 7% and 7.9%, respectively, while only one case each was reported by clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians and family members may perceive ELEs differently. Enabling patients and their families to talk about ELEs would assist in optimising grief care.

Nationwide survey on family caregiver-perceived experiences of patients with cancer of unknown primary site

PURPOSE

Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. As research on the experiences of CUP patients and their families is scarce, this study aimed to compare the family caregiver-perceived burden of CUP with that of common cancers (lung, colon, and stomach cancers). The association between family caregiver-perceived burden and CUP patients' quality of life (QOL) at end-of-life and family depression, respectively, was also explored.

METHODS

This was a pre-planned secondary analysis of nationwide cross-sectional survey data from the bereaved family caregivers of patients with cancer who died at 286 institutions. The major measurements were the eight-item family caregiver-perceived Burden scale (comprising specialist access, uncertainty, and prolonged diagnosis), Good Death Inventory, and Patient Health Questionnaire 9.

RESULTS

Of 27,591 survey responses, we analyzed 97 and 717 responses from family caregivers of patients with CUP and common cancer, respectively. The families of CUP patients scored significantly higher on all three burden subscales than those of common cancer patients (effect sizes: specialist access subscale, 0.3; uncertainty subscale, 0.66; and prolonged diagnosis subscale, 0.69; adjusted P < 0.01). Greater family burden was significantly associated with lower patient QOL and higher family depression. Burden was significantly associated with being a spouse, second opinion consultation, and diagnosis period of > 1 month.

CONCLUSION

The family caregivers of CUP patients experience poor specialist access, greater uncertainty, and a prolonged diagnosis. They should be cared for from the initial stages to establish access to specialists, obtain an early diagnosis, and reduce uncertainty.

The impact of death rattle on bereaved families: not the sound itself, but the resonance with their feelings

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore (i) the consistency between physician-rated and bereaved family-perceived intensity of death rattle, (ii) the relationship between intensity of death rattle and the bereaved family's distress and (iii) the bereaved family's experience and feelings related to suctioning for death rattle.

METHODS

We used matched data for deceased patients from a prospective cohort study of cancer patients admitted to a palliative care unit, and their bereaved families from a nationwide questionnaire survey in Japan. The intensity of death rattle using Back's score was evaluated prospectively by physicians and retrospectively by bereaved families.

RESULTS

In total, 1122 bereaved families answered (response rate: 66.7%). Of these, 297 reported the development of death rattle. The maximum intensity of death rattle evaluated by physicians and perceived by bereaved families was poorly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.188, P = 0.082). The optimal cut-off point of Back's score for detecting high-level distress was 1/2, with a low accuracy of prediction (area under the curve 0.62). More than 70% of bereaved families indicated suctioning reduced the intensity of death rattle, made patients comfortable and themselves relieved, whereas a similar proportion felt patients were in distress during suctioning. Families who felt suctioning was gently performed and discussed well whether to do suctioning with health care providers felt less needs for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Bereaved family-perceived intensity of death rattle did not correlate to physician-evaluated intensity, and the intensity of death rattle itself seemed to poorly correlate to family distress. Gently performed suctioning based on sufficient discussion with families can help reduce family-perceived patient discomfort.

Bathing in Terminal Care of Cancer Patients and Its Relation to Perceptions of a “Good Death”: A Nationwide Bereavement Survey in Japan

Background:

Objectives:

Design:

Setting/Subjects:

Measurements:

Results:

Conclusions:

Family experience of palliative sedation therapy: proportional vs. continuous deep sedation

PURPOSE

Some patients experience intense symptoms refractory to intensive palliative care, and palliative sedation is sometimes used. Palliative sedation may be classified into proportional and continuous deep sedation (CDS). The primary aim of this study was to compare family experience between families of patients who received proportional or CDS.

METHODS

A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted involving bereaved families of cancer patients who received proportional or CDS based on a sedation protocol. Overall evaluation of sedation (satisfaction, family-perceived distress, appropriateness of timing, and patient distress) and 13-item family concerns, good death, satisfaction with care, depression, quality of care, unfinished business, and balance between symptom relief and maintaining communication were measured.

RESULTS

Among the 2120 patients who died, 222 patients received a continuous infusion of midazolam. A sedation protocol was used in 147 patients, and questionnaires were sent to 124 families. A total of 78 responses were finally returned (proportional, 58 vs. CDS, 20). There were no significant differences in the overall evaluation, family concerns, total score of good death, satisfaction, depression, or balance between symptom relief and maintaining communication. On the other hand, some quality of care items, i.e., relationship with medical staff (P < 0.01), physical care by nurses (P = 0.04), and coordination and consistency (P = 0.04), were significantly better in the CDS group than in the proportional sedation group. Family-reported unfinished business was also better in the CDS group, with marginal significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Family experience of CDS was not less favorable than proportional sedation, and actually rated more favorably for some elements of quality of care and unfinished business.

The Association of Family Functioning With Possible Major Depressive Disorders and Complicated Grief Among Bereaved Family Members of Patients With Cancer: Results From the J-HOPE4 Study, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Follow-Up Survey in Japan

CONTEXT

Family functioning is a modifiable factor associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) and complicated grief (CG) among the bereaved families of patients with advanced cancer; however, the evidence regarding this association is limited.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to explore the association of family functioning with possible MDD and CG among the bereaved families of patients with advanced cancer who died in palliative care units.

METHODS

This study is a part of the J-HOPE4 study, a nationwide cross-sectional multi-purpose questionnaire survey conducted in 2018. We recruited potential participants from 164 inpatient palliative care units in Japan and assessed family functioning with the Family Relations Index (FRI). Family functioning was classified into three categories (Well-functioning: FRI ≥ 10, Intermediate: FRI = 8〜9, Dysfunctioning ≤ 7). The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) were used to assess depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) and complicated grief (BGQ score ≥ 8), respectively. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed with possible MDD and CG and factors the family functioning.

RESULTS

A total of 615 questionnaires were returned, of which 54.0 % (n = 510) age of questionnaires could be used. Although family functioning was associated with possible MDD (21.1% in Dysfunctional; 9.3% in Well-functional, P = 0.016), it was not associated with possible CG (14.8% in Dysfunctional; 9.9% in Well-functional, P = 0.929). Possible MDD and CG were significantly associated with deteriorated family relationships (OR:8.29; P = 0.004 and OR:34.00; P < 0.001, respectively), and consulting with health care providers about their concerns (OR:0.23; P = 0.003 and OR:0.23; P = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Family function was affected by post-bereavement possible MDD and not by CG. Our findings suggest that health care providers can identify risk factors for MDD among bereaved, dysfunctional family members.

Care Associated With Satisfaction of Bereaved Family Members of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients With Dyspnea: A Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey

CONTEXT

Terminal dyspnea in dying cancer patients is frequent and distressing, and the impact extends to their families. Families are often involved in providing care for terminal dyspnea.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe various care strategies for terminal dyspnea in cancer patients hospitalized in palliative care units (PCUs), evaluate families' satisfaction with care for terminal dyspnea, and explore determinants contributing to families' satisfaction.

METHODS

A nationwide, cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-reported questionnaire among bereaved families of cancer patients who died in PCUs. The questionnaire consisted of questions on the perceptions of care offered to patients with terminal dyspnea and their families, satisfaction with care for terminal dyspnea, family-perceived intensity of terminal dyspnea, use of oxygen, and background data of patients and families.

RESULTS

In total, 533 participants (response rate = 54%) returned the completed questionnaires, and 231 reported that their loved one had experienced terminal dyspnea. Dedicated and compassionate care was perceived by 60%-89% of the participants as the strategy provided for patients. Care for family members was perceived by 58%-69% of the participants. Perception of dedicated and compassionate care for patients and that of care for family members were significantly associated with high satisfaction (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 8.64, 3.85-19.36 and 15.37, 5.00-47.25, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Dedicated and compassionate care may be the essential part of the care for terminal dyspnea. Dedicated and compassionate care for patients and care for family members have a potential of improving the care satisfaction among family caregivers.

Appropriate referral timing to specialized palliative care service: survey of bereaved families of cancer patients who died in palliative care units

Few studies have investigated appropriate referral timing of specialized palliative care (SPC) from the perspective of cancer patients' and families' experiences. We aimed to clarify appropriate SPC referral timing for patients with advanced cancer and their families. We used data from a nationwide bereaved family survey in Japan. We sent a questionnaire to 999 bereaved families of cancer patients who died in 164 palliative care units (PCUs) and analyzed the first SPC referral timing and how patients evaluated it. We defined SPC as outpatient or inpatient palliative care service comprising certified palliative care physicians, advanced-practice nurses, and multidisciplinary practitioners. Finally, 51.6% (n = 515) of all responses were analyzed. The SPC referral timing was evaluated as appropriate (26.1%), late or too late (20.2%), early or too early (1.2%), or none of these (52.5%). Of these, 32.3% reported that they were referred to an SPC when diagnosed with advanced or incurable cancer or during anti-cancer treatment, and 62.6% reported they were referred after anti-cancer treatment. Patient-perceived appropriateness of SPC referral timing was associated with their good death process. After excluding "none of these" responses, a significantly higher proportion of respondents who reported being referred to SPC at diagnosis and during anti-cancer treatment evaluated the response timing as appropriate, compared to those who reported being referred after anti-cancer treatment. Appropriate timing for SPC referrals relates to quality of death; findings suggest that appropriate timing is at the time of diagnosis or during anti-cancer treatment.

Changes in depressive symptoms among family caregivers of patients with cancer after bereavement and their association with resilience: A prospective cohort study

Objectives

To elucidate changes in depressive symptoms after bereavement and the impact of pre‐loss resilience on such changes and on the extent of complicated grief and posttraumatic growth.

Methods

Prospective cohort surveys were provided to family caregivers of patients with cancer in four palliative care units (PCUs) before and after bereavement. Pre‐loss Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale scores, pre‐ and post‐loss Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 scores, post‐loss Brief Grief Questionnaire scores, and the expanded Posttraumatic Growth Inventory scores were determined.

Results

Out of 186 bereaved family caregivers, 71 (38.2%) responses were analyzed, among which 47% pre‐loss and 15% post‐loss responses suggested to be a high risk for major depressive disorder (MDD). Approximately 90% of family caregivers at a high risk for post‐loss MDD were already at a high risk for pre‐loss MDD. Even after adjustment of the background variables as covariates, the interaction effect between family caregivers' pre‐loss depressive symptoms and resilience on post‐loss depressive symptoms was observed (F = 7.29; p < 0.01). Moreover, pre‐loss resilience was not associated with other bereavement outcome measures.

Conclusions

Among family caregivers of patients with cancer in PCUs, 47% and 15% had high risk for MDD before and after bereavement, respectively. Moreover, pre‐loss resilience mitigated post‐loss depressive symptoms among family caregivers who had high risk for MDD before bereavement. However, considering the study's small sample size, further research is needed.

Unmet need for palliative rehabilitation in inpatient hospices/palliative care units: a nationwide post-bereavement survey

In end-of-life care, rehabilitation for terminally ill cancer patients is inconsistently provided and rarely discussed. We sought to clarify the prevalence of unmet rehabilitation need for patients admitted to inpatient hospice/palliative care units as perceived by bereaved family members. We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey of 1001 family members of cancer patients who died at inpatient hospices/palliative care units. For cancer patients who did not receive rehabilitation, we asked if family members perceived that the patient would have wanted rehabilitation intervention. Data were obtained from 416 respondents. Of these, 281 (67.5%) cases received no rehabilitation. The need for physical modalities was the most frequently reported (27.8%; 95% CI: 22.6-33.4), followed by relief of dyspnea (25.6%; 95% CI: 20.6-31.1) and treatment of edema (23.8%; 95% CI: 19.0-29.3). A non-negligible proportion of bereaved families reported unmet need for rehabilitation related to symptom management in inpatient hospices/palliative care units.

Are cancer patients living alone more or less likely to achieve a good death? Two cross-sectional surveys of bereaved families

This study examined differences in sociodemographic characteristics and the achievement of a good death between cancer patients who live alone and those who do not live alone prior to death in different settings. Secondary analysis of data collected across two cross-sectional self-reported questionnaire surveys was undertaken. The participants were bereaved family members of cancer patients who had died in palliative care units (PCUs), acute hospitals or homes. We stratified the data by the place of death and examined the differences in sociodemographic characteristics to determine the relationship between cancer patients achieving a "good death" and whether they were living alone. The data were collected through 15,949 surveys. On the Good Death Inventory, significantly higher total scores emerged for cancer patients who were living alone than for those who not living alone in PCUs (effect size [ES] = 0.11, Student's t-test: p < .0001), but not in acute hospitals (ES = -0.03, p = 0.74) or home care services (ES = 0.02, p = 0.86). Cancer patients who were living alone were more likely to have been female, been older and have earned a lower annual income than those who were not living alone. Thus, among those who had received specialized palliative care, there was no difference in the quality of palliative care between cancer patients who were or were not living alone.

Predicting models of depression or complicated grief among bereaved family members of patients with cancer

OBJECTIVE

To derive and validate a risk scoring system for predicting major depressive disorder (MDD) and complicated grief (CG) among bereaved family members of patients with cancer that is feasible for clinical use.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of two cross-sectional nationwide bereavement surveys in Japan. From a total of 17,312 bereaved family members of patients with cancer, 8618 and 8619 were randomly assigned to a derivation and a validation group. The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) were used to assess MDD (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) and CG (BGQ score ≥ 8), respectively. We compared five models with potential predictive variables that could be easily obtained in daily practice and were included in the bereavement survey (i.e., sociodemographic data).

RESULTS

The model which included variables such as the families' physical/mental health status and preparedness toward bereavement, in addition to their sociodemographic data, was considered modest for predicting the risk of both MDD and CG. The areas around the curve for MDD and CG were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.73-0.76) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.72-0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.79) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.76-0.79) in the derivation and validation groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a clinical risk score for predicting MDD and CG among bereaved family members of patients with cancer. However, further research is needed for external validation and assessment regarding its implementation in actual practice.

Cancer Care Evaluation Scale (CCES): measuring the quality of the structure and process of cancer care from the perspective of patients with cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of the structure and process of cancer care from the perspective of patients with cancer, we developed a Cancer Care Evaluation Scale.

METHODS

Two anonymous online surveys of patients with cancer in Japan were conducted using a convenience sample of 400 adult cancer outpatients.

RESULTS

In total, 162 patients participated in the online surveys. Factor analysis revealed that the Cancer Care Evaluation Scale had the following 12 domains: (i) relationship with physician, (ii) relationship with nurse, (iii) physical care by physician, (iv) physical care by nurse, (v) psycho-existential care, (vi) help with decision-making for patients, (vii) coordination and consistency, (viii) environment, (ix) cost, (x) availability, (xi) care for the side effects of cancer treatment by a physician, and (xii) care for the side effects of cancer treatment by a nurse. The Cancer Care Evaluation Scale was correlated with overall care satisfaction (r = 0.75), but not with the quality of life (r = 0.40). In regard to rest-retest reliability, most items showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.7 or higher.

CONCLUSION

The validity and reliability of the Cancer Care Evaluation Scale were confirmed, suggesting that this tool is useful for evaluating the quality of cancer care from the perspective of patients with cancer.

Rehabilitation for Cancer Patients in Inpatient Hospices/Palliative Care Units and Achievement of a Good Death: Analyses of Combined Data From Nationwide Surveys Among Bereaved Family Members

CONTEXT

In end-of-life care, rehabilitation for patients with cancer is considered to be an important means for improving patients' quality of death and dying.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the provision of rehabilitation for patients with cancer in palliative care units is associated with the achievement of a good death.

METHODS

This study involved a cross-sectional, anonymous, and self-report questionnaire survey of families of patients with cancer who died in palliative care units in Japan. We evaluated the short version of Good Death Inventory (GDI) on a seven-point scale. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the propensity score. Covariates included in this model were survey year, patients' characteristics, and families' characteristics. The associations between rehabilitation and GDI were tested using trend tests after propensity score matching adjustment.

RESULTS

Of the 1965 family caregivers who received the questionnaires, available data were obtained from 1008 respondents (51.2%). Among them, 285 (28.2%) cases received rehabilitation in palliative care units. There was no difference in total GDI score between the groups with and without rehabilitation. In exploratory analyses, patients receiving rehabilitation were significantly more likely to feel maintaining hope and pleasure (mean 4.50 [SE 0.10] vs. 4.05 [0.11], respectively; effect size [ES] 0.31; P = 0.003), good relationships with medical staff (mean 5.67 [SE 0.07] vs. 5.43 [0.09], respectively; ES 0.22; P = 0.035), and being respected as an individual (mean 6.08 [SE 0.06] vs. 5.90 [0.07], respectively; ES 0.19; P = 0.049) compared with patients not receiving rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Rehabilitation in palliative care units may contribute to several domains of quality of death and dying, particularly maintaining hope and pleasure. Further research is needed to investigate whether palliative rehabilitation contributes to the achievement of a good death.

Beliefs and Perceptions About Parenteral Nutrition and Hydration by Family Members of Patients With Advanced Cancer Admitted to Palliative Care Units: A Nationwide Survey of Bereaved Family Members in Japan

CONTEXT

There has been a growing consensus that parenteral nutrition and hydration is to be forgone in terminally ill patients with cancer. However, it remains unclear what the beliefs and perceptions of parenteral nutrition and hydration by the family members are.

OBJECTIVES

To clarify their beliefs and perceptions and examine the relationships between the factors of family members, their beliefs and perceptions, and their overall satisfaction with the care the patient received at the place of death.

METHODS

This study was performed as a part of the cross-sectional anonymous nationwide survey of the bereaved family members of patients with cancer in Japan.

RESULTS

In total, 1001 questionnaires were sent, and 610 questionnaires were returned. Among these, 499 were analyzed. Regarding the prevalence of beliefs and perceptions about parenteral nutrition and hydration, when a patient cannot eat enough, parenteral hydration is needed was the highest (87.7%), followed by the opinions of medical staff are important in the issue of parenteral nutrition and hydration, parenteral hydration serves as a substitute for oral hydration, and if I were a patient and could not eat enough, parenteral hydration would be needed (85.1%, 81.0%, and 80.0%, respectively). We extracted two concepts as follows: belief that parenteral nutrition and hydration are beneficial and perceived need for parenteral nutrition and hydration. They were not identified as independent determinants of overall care satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that beliefs and perceptions about parenteral nutrition and hydration were important in the family members in palliative care.

The Bereaved Families' Preferences for Individualized Goals of Care for Terminal Dyspnea: What Is an Acceptable Balance between Dyspnea Intensity and Communication Capacity?

Background: Toward the individualized care of terminally ill patients with dyspnea (“terminal dyspnea”), it is essential to identify individualized goals of care (GOC) to achieve an acceptable balance between dyspnea intensity and communication capacity.

Objective: To explore preferences for individualized GOC for terminal dyspnea, and factors associated with the preferences.

Design: A nationwide cross-sectional survey.

Setting/Subjects: In total, 1055 bereaved families of cancer patients admitted to 167 inpatient hospices in Japan.

Measurements: Preferences for individualized GOC for terminal dyspnea to achieve an acceptable balance between dyspnea intensity and communication capacity, should individuals experience continuous moderate or severe/overwhelming dyspnea despite optimal palliative care, and perceptions about a good death.

Results: Among 548 participants (response rate = 52%), we analyzed responses of 477 families whose loved one suffered dyspnea in the last week of life. In total, 167 (45%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 40%–50%) and 272 (80%; 95% CI = 75%–84%) participants would prioritize dyspnea relief over communication capacity, should they continuously suffer moderate or severe/overwhelming dyspnea, respectively. In multivariate analyses, the determinants of the prioritization of dyspnea relief were perceiving physical comfort as important for a good death (odds ratio [OR] = 1.389; 95% CI = 1.062–1.818; p = 0.017) in moderate dyspnea, and perceiving physical comfort (OR = 2.505; 95% CI = 1.718–3.651; p < 0.001) and not perceiving mental awareness (OR = 0.695; 95% CI = 0.529–0.913; p = 0.009) as important in severe/overwhelming dyspnea.

Conclusions: Preferences for individualized GOC for terminal dyspnea can vary among individuals and with different symptom intensity, and may be influenced by perceptions about a good death. Outcome measurements incorporating an acceptable balance between dyspnea intensity and communication capacity should be developed.