Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study

Evaluating the trend of time to colposcopy follow-up among women with a positive primary human papillomavirus screening result at Kaiser Permanente Southern California

BACKGROUND

Timeliness of colposcopy follow-up after primary human papillomavirus screening has not been well examined.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated time to colposcopy follow-up among women with an abnormal primary human papillomavirus screening result overall and by human papillomavirus genotype, triage cytology results, race/ethnicity, and neighborhood deprivation index.

STUDY DESIGN

Women aged 30 to 65 years who received primary human papillomavirus screening at Kaiser Permanente Southern California from July 15, 2020, to December 31, 2021 and had screening results that required colposcopy follow-up were identified. All data were collected from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's electronic medical records. Multivariable modified Poisson models were used to evaluate the associations between human papillomavirus type and triage cytology results, race/ethnicity, neighborhood deprivation index, and receiving a colposcopy within 3 months and 6 months of screening results.

RESULTS

A total of 5833 women were included. The mean age was 42.9 years; 11.4%, 9.8%, 48.7%, and 24.4% were of Asian/Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity. Overall, 71% and 78% received colposcopy within 3 and 6 months of screening, respectively. Compared with women with non-16/18, other high-risk human papillomavirus types and low-grade cytology results, women with HPV 16/18 with normal low-grade or high-grade cytology results and women with other high-risk human papillomavirus and high-grade cytology results were more likely to have colposcopy within 3 months of screening results [risk ratio ranged from 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.25) to 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.25, 1.42)]. Non-Hispanic Black women (vs non-Hispanic White, risk ratio=0.93 [0.87, 1.00]) and women from the most deprived neighborhoods (vs least deprived, risk ratio=0.95 [0.90, 1.00]) had lower likelihoods of receiving colposcopy within 3 months of screening. Findings for 6 months of follow-up were similar to that of 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Our observations confirmed prioritization of diagnostic follow-up for women with human papillomavirus 16/18+ as well as high-grade cytology results. Barriers to incomplete colposcopy follow-up and disparity should be better understood and addressed.

Evaluation of follow-up colposcopy procedures after abnormal cervical screening result across a statewide study in Mississippi

PURPOSE

Cervical screening is used to detect and treat precancers to prevent invasive cancers. However, successful prevention also requires adequate follow-up and treatment of individuals with abnormal screening results. The aim was to investigate demographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-up status for individuals needing colposcopy after an abnormal screening result.

METHODS

The STRIDES (Studying Risk to Improve DisparitiES) cohort comprises individuals undergoing cervical cancer screening and management at a Mississippi Health Department or University of Mississippi clinic. Follow-up status, demographics, and clinical data were assessed from electronic health records and, if necessary, patient navigation on individuals identified as needing a colposcopy after an abnormal screening.

RESULTS

Of the 1,458 individuals requiring colposcopy, 43.0% had the procedure within 4 months, 16.4% had a delayed procedure, and 39.5% had no documented colposcopy follow-up, with significant predictors of follow-up identified as age and cytology diagnosis. Individuals 30 + were more likely to have follow up with a colposcopy compared to individuals < 30 years (49% and 38.7%, respectively; p < .001). Individuals with cytology diagnoses of LSIL (52.9%), ASC-H (51.4%), and HSIL (62.3%) had higher percentages of adherence to follow-up guidelines (p < .001). In total, we found that 78% of individuals had some type of follow-up, including a repeat screening visit.

CONCLUSION

Despite high cervical cancer screening rates among Mississippians, a substantial proportion did not have adequate next-step intervention. However, it is encouraging that highest risk individuals were more likely to have a colposcopy. Regardless, continuing to understand the underlying causes for incomplete follow-up is crucial for timely secondary targeted interventions to reduce cervical cancer burden, promote awareness, and improve health outcomes.

Barriers and facilitators for adherence to follow-up by HR-HPV-positive women with premalignant cervical lesions: a mixed-design study in Mexico

BACKGROUND

Mexico reports low follow-up completion rates among women with abnormal cervical cancer screenings. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to follow-up adherence among women with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and premalignant cervical lesions in Mexico.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study was conducted from February to April 2019. Participants included women undergoing follow-up care for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and premalignant lesions, along with health personnel from the Women's Healthcare Center (CAPASAM) in Mexico. Quantitative data were obtained from the Women's Cancer Information System and through a questionnaire about factors affecting follow-up adherence. Additionally, the health personnel involved completed a compliance checklist regarding care regulations. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with both groups, followed by a content analysis based on identified categories. The Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point System confirmed care process risks. Proposals to enhance the Early Detection Program for Prevention and Control of Cervical Cancer were collected from a CAPASAM health personnel nominal group.

RESULTS

Identified barriers to follow-up included low income among CAPASAM users, family provider roles limiting time for appointments, long waits for testing and results delivery, distant facilities, insufficient service hour communication, inadequate health personnel training, and a lack of systematic counseling. Hesitation toward follow-up was also linked to shame, apprehension, uncertainty, test aversion, fear of positive results, and limited cervical cancer and screening knowledge. Patriarchal attitudes of partners and limited access to the now-discontinued PROSPERA government program further discouraged follow-up. Facilitators comprised respectful treatment by CAPASAM staff, no-cost services, health campaigns, and positive user attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found more barriers than facilitators to follow-up adherence, highlighting the need for strategies to bolster the Early Detection Program. Future strategies must address the comprehensive array of factors and incorporate stakeholder perspectives.

Real-world effectiveness of cytology and HPV-based screening strategy in cervical cancer screening: A cross-sectional population-based study in Chengdu, China

Cervical cancer poses a significant health challenge in developing countries, emphasizing the need for appropriate screening strategies to accelerate the elimination of this disease. This study summarized the results of a large-scale community-based cervical cancer screening program conducted in Chengdu, China, to understand the prevalence of HPV infection and cervical lesions in the population, and to compare the real-world effectiveness of two different screening methods implemented in the program. From January 2021 to December 2022, a total of 363,376 women aged 35-64 years in Chengdu received free screenings. Among these participants, 70.1% received cytology screening and 29.9% received HPV testing combined with 16/18 genotyping and cytology triage. Ultimately, 824 cases of high-grade lesions and cervical cancer were detected, with a total detection rate of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions of 226.8 per 100,000. The follow-up rate of patients with high-grade lesions and above was 98.9%, and the treatment rate was 86.6%. The overall high-risk HPV infection rate was 11.7%, with the HPV 16/18 infection rate of 1.4%. The rate of abnormal cytology results was 2.8%. The attendance rates for colposcopy and histopathology were 71.6% and 86.1%, respectively. By calculating the age-standardized rates to eliminate the different age composition between the two group, the HPV-based screening strategy had a higher rate of primary screening abnormalities (3.4% vs. 2.8%, P<0.001), higher attendance rates of colposcopy (76.5% vs. 68.9%, P<0.001) and histopathological diagnosis (94.1% vs. 78.0%, P<0.001), higher percentage of abnormal colposcopy results (76.0% vs. 44.0%, P<0.001), and higher detection rate of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer (393.1 per 100,000 vs. 156.4 per 100,000, P<0.001) compared to cytology screening. Our study indicates that the combination of HPV testing with 16/18 genotyping and cytology triage has demonstrated superior performance in cervical cancer screening compared to cytology alone in large-scale population.

Evaluation of Follow-up Colposcopy Procedures After Abnormal Cervical Screening Result Across a Statewide Study in Mississippi

Purpose

Cervical screening is used to detect and treat precancers to prevent invasive cancers. However, successful prevention also requires adequate follow-up and treatment of individuals with abnormal screening results. The aim was to investigate demographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-up status for individuals needing colposcopy after an abnormal screening result.

Methods

The STRIDES (Studying Risk to Improve DisparitiES) cohort comprises individuals undergoing cervical cancer screening and management at a Mississippi Health Department or University of Mississippi clinic. Follow-up status, demographics, and clinical data were assessed from electronic health records and, if necessary, patient navigation on individuals identified as needing a colposcopy after an abnormal screening.

Results

Of the 1,458 individuals requiring colposcopy, 43.0% had the procedure within 4 months, 16.4% had a delayed procedure, and 39.5% had no documented follow-up, with significant predictors of follow-up identified as age and cytology diagnosis. Based on age, individuals 30 + were more likely to follow up with a colposcopy compared to individuals < 30 years (49% and 38.7%, respectively; p < .001). Individuals with cytology diagnoses of LSIL (52.9%), ASC-H (51.4%), and HSIL (62.3%) had higher percentages of adherence to follow-up colposcopy guidelines (p < .001).

Conclusion

Despite high cervical cancer screening rates among Mississippians, a substantial portion did not have adequate next-step intervention. However, it is encouraging that highest risk individuals were more likely to have a colposcopy. Regardless, continuing to understand the underlying causes for incomplete follow-up is crucial for timely secondary targeted interventions to reduce cervical cancer burden, promote awareness, and improve health outcomes.

Factors Affecting Non-Histologically Proven Invasive Cancer of the Uterine Cervix that Had an Abnormal Pap Smear: Results of the CCS Program

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer (CC) ranks fourth among cancers diagnosed around the world, but early detection and treatment can reduce invasive cervical cancer and mortality. Screening programs (CCSP), such as the one covering Thailand's 75 provinces, use histology to confirm cases. The study determined the incidence rate (IR) and investigated the factors associated with non-histologically proven invasive cancer of the uterine cervix (non-HPICUC) with an abnormal pap smear from the CCSP at Mahasarakham Hospital, Thailand.

METHODS

The CCSP was used to analyse a retrospective cohort of 288 women between 30 and 60 years of age. All abnormal pap smears were followed up until April 30, 2022. We estimated the IR and assessed the relationship between various independent variables and non-HPICUC using the generalised linear model (GLM) for testing association data. We reported the adjusted RR and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

260 non-HPICUC cases had abnormal CCSP pap smears for an overall IR of 90.0 (95% CI: 86.3 - 93.2). After adjusting the model for all variables, age at recruitment and pregnancy had a statistically significant association with non-HPICUC (p-value < 0.05). We found that the risk of non-HPICUC increased 1.02 times for every 20-year increment in age compared to below that age (adjusted RR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.04). Pregnancy at risk for non-HPICUC was 0.89 times compared to non-pregnancy (adjusted RR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.80 - 0.99). Pathological vaginal discharge (PVD) did not have a statistically significant association with non-HPICUC (p-value = 0.094); notwithstanding, women with PVD had 1.08 times the risk of non-HPICUC compared to women without PVD (adjusted RR=1.08, 95% CI: 0.97 - 1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on an abnormal pap smear from the CCS Program at Mahasarakham Hospital Thailand, age and pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of non-HPICUC. High-risk groups with abnormal pap smears should be targeted for CC campaigns.

Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result

Successful cervical cancer prevention requires screening and appropriate management of abnormal test results. Management includes diagnostic evaluation and treatment, if indicated, based on cervical cancer risk after most abnormal test results. There is little guidance on the optimal timing of diagnostic evaluation, and few data exist on factors associated with timely management. We quantified time-to-colposcopy within 12 months of an abnormal cervical cancer screening or surveillance test result from 2010 to 2018 across three diverse healthcare systems and described factors associated with timely colposcopy. Among 21-65 year-old patients with an abnormal test result for which colposcopy was indicated (n = 28,706), we calculated the proportion who received a colposcopy within 12 months of the abnormal test and used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate the probability of colposcopy within 12 months. Across all systems, 75.3% of patients received a colposcopy within 12 months, with site-specific estimates ranging from 70.0 to 83.0%. We fit mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with receipt of colposcopy within 12 months. The healthcare system and cytology result severity were the most important factors associated with of timely colposcopy. We observed that sites with more centralized processes had higher proportions of colposcopy completion, and patients with high-grade results were more consistently evaluated earlier than patients with low-grade results. Patient age also affected receipt of timely colposcopy, though this association differed by healthcare system and result severity. These data suggest opportunities for system-level interventions to improve management of abnormal cervical cancer test results.