1
|
Goldthorpe J, Kilbee L, Pretty I, Cotterill S, Hart J, Peters S. Supporting post-pandemic recovery: a qualitative study of the capabilities, opportunities and motivations to deliver oral health behaviour change messages to parents of young children in community settings. BMC Oral Health 2024; 24:580. [PMID: 38762726 PMCID: PMC11102627 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04344-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated vulnerabilities and inequalities in children's oral health, and treatment activity virtually ceased during periods of lockdown. Primary care dentistry is still in the post-pandemic recovery phase, and it may be some years before normal service is resumed in NHS dentistry. However, opportunities to support the dental workforce through offering some preventative care in outreach settings may exist. This has the additional benefit of potentially reaching children who do not routinely see a dentist. The aim of this research was therefore to explore views around upskilling practitioners working in early years educational and care settings to support families of pre-school aged children to adopt and maintain preventative oral health behaviours. METHODS Using the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation model of behaviour (COM-B) to structure our data collection and analysis, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 practitioners (dental and non-dental) and analysed the data using deductive framework analysis. RESULTS The data were a good fit with the COM-B model, and further themes were developed within each construct, representing insights from the data. CONCLUSION Early years practitioners can reach vulnerable children who are not usually brought to see a dentist, and have the capability, opportunity and motivation to support the oral health behaviours of families of children in their care. Further research is needed to identify training needs (oral health and behaviour change knowledge and skills), acceptability to parents, and supporting dental practice teams to work in partnership with early years settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Goldthorpe
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Health Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lauren Kilbee
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Health Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Iain Pretty
- Division of Medical Sciences, Colgate Palmolive University of Manchester Dental Health Unit, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Cotterill
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jo Hart
- Division of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Peters
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Health Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Collange F, Baudot A, Verot É. [Impact of a program encouraging prevention in primary care on a daily and opportunistic basis]. SOINS; LA REVUE DE REFERENCE INFIRMIERE 2024; 69:37-40. [PMID: 38762232 DOI: 10.1016/j.soin.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
In France, clinical preventive practices are still underdeveloped and formalized, notably due to a lack of guidelines, despite the fact that a proactive and systematic prevention and health promotion strategy involving all healthcare professionals seems essential. The P3C program aims to encourage preventive clinical practices among healthcare professionals, and thus contribute to the emergence of a common culture of prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanny Collange
- CIC 1408 Inserm, CHU de Saint-Étienne, 25 boulevard Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Étienne, France
| | - Amandine Baudot
- CIC 1408 Inserm, CHU de Saint-Étienne, 25 boulevard Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Étienne, France; Unité de recherche clinique (URC), CHU de Saint-Étienne, 25 boulevard Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Étienne, France
| | - Élise Verot
- CIC 1408 Inserm, CHU de Saint-Étienne, 25 boulevard Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Étienne, France; Laboratoire Parcours santé systémique (P2S), UR4129, Faculté de médecine Laënnec-Bât B, 7-11 rue Guillaume-Paradin, 69372 Lyon, France; Institut PRESAGE, Chaire Hygée, Université Jean-Monnet, 10 rue de la Marandière, 42270 Saint-Priest-en Jarez, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nichol B, Kemp E, Wilson R, Rodrigues AM, Hesselgreaves H, Robson C, Haighton C. Establishing an updated consensus on the conceptual and operational definitions of Making Every Contact Count (MECC) across experts within research and practice: an international Delphi Study. Public Health 2024; 230:29-37. [PMID: 38484623 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Making Every Contact Count (MECC) initiative is broadly defined as an opportunistic approach to prevention by making use of the thousands of conversations service providers have with service users every day. However, since its conception, the application of MECC has diverged and developed considerably. Thus, the current study aimed to revise the definition according to current research and practice to better describe what is and is not included. STUDY DESIGN A consensus building classic Delphi methodology, completed by an expert panel. METHODS Round 1 asked open questions around the definition of MECC. Content analysis of round 1 identified statements that were rated for agreement in round 2. Statements achieving ≥80% agreement were included in a short, long, or operational definition of MECC that were rated for agreement in round 3 (the minimum number required). An agreement of ≥80% indicated consensus. RESULTS Forty out of 100 contacted experts completed three rounds. Experts in practice and research were recruited internationally although most were from England. From round 1, 274 statements were generated, of which 96 achieved consensus and were included within round 3. The short and long definition received consensus in round 3, the operational definition required four rounds to reach consensus. CONCLUSIONS MECC is a person-centred approach to health behaviour change that, provided an individual possesses the relevant skills, can be delivered by anyone and anywhere. The distinguishing feature of MECC is not in its duration, target behaviour, or conditions for delivery, but rather in the approach taken and the mechanisms applied to conversations. Implications for research and practice are discussed, and the limits for applicability acknowledged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Nichol
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
| | - E Kemp
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - R Wilson
- Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - A M Rodrigues
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - H Hesselgreaves
- Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - C Robson
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - C Haighton
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parchment A, Lawrence W, Rahman E, Townsend N, Wainwright E, Wainwright D. 'Making every contact count' with patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a qualitative exploration of acceptability to physiotherapists. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1125. [PMID: 37858090 PMCID: PMC10588214 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10126-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To qualitatively explore physiotherapists' experiences and acceptability of implementing 'Making Every Contact Count Healthy Conversation Skills' (MECC HCS) in routine practice with patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. METHODS This article reports the second phase of a mixed method, sequential explanatory study. Physiotherapists trained in and delivering MECC HCS in their practice were invited to take part in semi-structured interviews. We hoped to develop a rich, in-depth understanding of their use and perceptions of the brief intervention and to contextualise findings from the first phase of the study. Qualitative data were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. RESULTS Physiotherapists valued MECC HCS as being integral to their practice, promoting a person-centred approach to supporting behaviour change and enhancing self-management in patients with MSK conditions and pain. It was believed that this brief intervention could reduce workload pressure for physiotherapists and have significant wider benefits for health services. Time limitations associated with appointments did, however, pose as a challenge to MECC HCS delivery, and it was felt that more organisational-level support was needed to sustain it. CONCLUSIONS These findings support our quantitative data, collected in the first phase of this study. MECC HCS is a highly acceptable brief intervention that can be delivered in physiotherapy care to support behaviour change in patients with MSK conditions. Future roll-out may be optimised within organisations by providing regular refresher training and adopting a MECC champion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Parchment
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, England, UK.
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration- Greater Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, England.
| | - Wendy Lawrence
- Primary Care, Population Science and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, England, UK
| | - Em Rahman
- Public Health Workforce Development, Southern House, Health Education England, Winchester, SO21 2RU, England, UK
| | - Nick Townsend
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, England, UK
| | - Elaine Wainwright
- Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - David Wainwright
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Middleton N, Hadjigeorgiou E, Kolokotroni O, Christodoulides V, Koliandri I, Nicolaou C, Papadopoulou M, Kouta C, Karanikola M, Baum A. Identifying barriers to the educational role of midwives in Cyprus and defining determinants in behaviour terms using the Behaviour Change Wheel: a mixed-method formative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1233. [PMID: 36199135 PMCID: PMC9534462 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08599-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Τhe Baby Buddy Cyprus webapp was co-created with parents and health professionals within a Participatory Action Research framework. While using Baby Buddy in routine consultations can support the educational role of mother–child healthcare providers (HP), antenatal education (AE) may be currently perceived as a formal activity within the physical space of the antenatal class. We aimed to gain an understanding of influences on midwives engaging in an educational role during routine appointments and identify potential interventions using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework. Methods This is a formative mixed-methods research study, with a convergent parallel design, guided by the COM-B model and related Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Complimentary methods were used to collect information from in-training and registered midwives: focus group (N = 11), questionnaire survey (N = 24) and Nominal Group Technique during workshops (N = 40). Deductive content analysis of qualitative data and quantitative survey analysis shaped the behaviour diagnosis along the 6 COM-B and 14 TDF domains, and informed the selection of relevant intervention functions and related Behaviour Change Techniques from the BCW taxonomy. Results AE is viewed as a core function of the professional role, yet neither supported nor prioritized by current practices. Problematic areas relate to organizational context, such as weak interprofessional collaboration and lack of policy, protocols and resources. In addition, medicalization of birth and related socio-cultural norms, pertaining to users and providers, are sustaining alienation of the midwife and conditions of power dynamics. AE was perceived as a means to enhance the autonomy of the profession but there might be issues with procedural knowledge and the need for skill development was identified. Several intervention functions were identified as promising, however cognitive re-framing through strategic communication and modelling may also be needed both in terms of providing “credible models” for the role itself as well as re-framing AE through the concept of “making every contact count”. Conclusions AE is currently perceived to be a ‘bad fit’ with routine practice. The study identified several barriers to the educational role of midwives, influencing Capacity, Opportunity and Motivation. While digital tools, such as Baby Buddy, can facilitate aspects of the process, a much wider behaviour and system change intervention is needed to enhance midwives’ educational role and professional identity. In addition to proposing a theory-driven research-informed intervention, the process functioned as a participatory learning experience through collective reflection. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08599-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicos Middleton
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus. .,Birth Forward, Non-Governmental Organization, Nicosia, Cyprus.
| | - Eleni Hadjigeorgiou
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Ourania Kolokotroni
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.,Birth Forward, Non-Governmental Organization, Nicosia, Cyprus.,Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | - Ioanna Koliandri
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Christiana Nicolaou
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Maria Papadopoulou
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Christiana Kouta
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Maria Karanikola
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Alison Baum
- Best Beginnings, Registered Charity Organization, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Whittaker EM, Levy AR, Matata B, Kinnafick FE, Midgley AW. Using Behavior Change Interventions in Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Perspectives from Healthcare Professionals in the United Kingdom. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19041980. [PMID: 35206176 PMCID: PMC8872220 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
This study explores healthcare professionals’ experiences of using behavior change interventions in clinical practice. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 healthcare professionals working in a cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation National Health Service Trust in the United Kingdom. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Four overarching themes representing healthcare practitioners’ perceptions of using behavior change interventions were identified: (1) reliance on experiential learning, (2) knowledge transition, (3) existing professional development programs, and (4) barriers and facilitators for continued professional development. The results are discussed in relation to the implications they may have for behavior change training in clinical healthcare practice. Healthcare professionals require bespoke and formalized training to optimize their delivery of behavior change interventions in cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation. Doing so will enhance intervention fidelity and implementation that can potentially ameliorate patient rehabilitation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor M. Whittaker
- Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Lancashire L39 4QP, UK;
- Health Research Institute, Edge Hill University, Lancashire L39 4QP, UK;
| | - Andrew R. Levy
- Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Lancashire L39 4QP, UK;
- Health Research Institute, Edge Hill University, Lancashire L39 4QP, UK;
- Correspondence:
| | - Bashir Matata
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK;
| | - Florence E. Kinnafick
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK;
| | - Adrian W. Midgley
- Health Research Institute, Edge Hill University, Lancashire L39 4QP, UK;
- Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Lancashire L39 4QP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pallin ND, Webb J, Brown L, Woznitza N, Stewart-Lord A, Charlesworth L, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Online training resources to aid therapeutic radiographers in engaging in conversations about physical activity and diet: A mixed methods study. Radiography (Lond) 2022; 28:124-132. [PMID: 34583887 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study explored changes in therapeutic radiographers' (TRs) self-reported knowledge and skills to engage in conversations about physical activity and diet with people living with and beyond cancer following completion of publicly available online courses. METHODS Participants were randomly assigned to two of five online courses that aim to support health professionals to engage in conversations about physical activity and diet in the oncology setting. Participants rated their agreement with 18 statements related to the COM-B (capability, opportunity and motivation-behaviour) model components following completion of an online course on healthy diet (n = 16) and physical activity (n = 21). Semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 21) were also conducted. Analysis of the interviews was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS Overall, the online courses were acceptable and the TRs in this study self-reported improved COM to deliver advice on physical activity and diet. The inclusion of the evidence and scientific rationale on the benefits of diet and physical activity, and also guidance on how to start conversations with patients were highlighted as important features of the courses. Suggestions for adaptations to the nutrition courses included the need for content that accounts for the side effects cancer patients experience while undergoing treatment. To support the implementation of training and the delivery of advice on these topics, multi-disciplinary working, organisational support and guidance around professional role boundaries were highlighted as important. CONCLUSION Current publicly available online courses on physical activity and diet for oncology health professionals can reduce some barriers among TRs to providing advice to those living with and beyond cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Existing online training courses could be used to support TRs to deliver physical activity and dietary advice in practice. Findings show that these courses can be disseminated within radiotherapy departments. The results also highlight a number of important considerations for the implementation of brief health behaviour advice and online training interventions on physical activity and diet within cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N D Pallin
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland; School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK.
| | - J Webb
- Centre for Primary Health and Social Care, School of Social Professions, London Metropolitan University, London, UK.
| | - L Brown
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - N Woznitza
- Radiology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - A Stewart-Lord
- School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK.
| | - L Charlesworth
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
| | - R J Beeken
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - A Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cheng X, Ma XY, Luo C, Chen J, Wei W, Yang X. Examining the relationships between medical students' preferred online instructional strategies, course difficulty level, learning performance, and effectiveness. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION 2021; 45:661-669. [PMID: 34498933 PMCID: PMC8435943 DOI: 10.1152/advan.00234.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Students' preferences and engagement with online educational resources and activities are crucial for academic success in the context of online medical education. This study investigated the preferences of Chinese medical students regarding the teaching strategies used by instructors and their relationship with course difficulty level, student's academic performance, and perceived effectiveness. Survey data (n = 375) were collected from the medical students from one of the largest medical schools in Southern China during the spring semester of 2020. First, exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that there were three latent factors behind online teaching strategies, including teacher-led instructional strategies, supervised and monitored learning strategies, and self-directed learning strategies. Instructional activities under teacher supervision and monitoring received the highest rating while teacher-led strategies received the lowest ratings. Second, the popularity of the three online instructional strategies we have identified was positively associated with students' perceived effectiveness of online teaching and their self-reported academic performance. Third, analysis of the quantified answers to the open-ended question reported a positive association between the perceived difficulty level of the courses and students' preference of teacher-led strategies. It also manifested a positive correlation between perceived effectiveness level of the online teaching and the use of self-directed learning strategies before their online lectures. Further implications of the findings are fully discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Cheng
- Division of Histology and Embryology, Key Laboratory for Regenerative Medicine of the Ministry of Education, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin-Yue Ma
- Division of Histology and Embryology, Key Laboratory for Regenerative Medicine of the Ministry of Education, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chaohua Luo
- College Office, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Chen
- College Office, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Wei
- University International College, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuesong Yang
- Division of Histology and Embryology, Key Laboratory for Regenerative Medicine of the Ministry of Education, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tuohy D, Fahy A, Murphy L. Student nurses and midwives' experiences of teaching and learning about 'making every contact count' health behaviour change programme: Descriptive qualitative study. Nurse Educ Pract 2021; 57:103246. [PMID: 34717167 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM/OBJECTIVE To explore nursing/midwifery students' experiences of the teaching and learning of units one and two of a national undergraduate curriculum. BACKGROUND The 'National Undergraduate Curriculum for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management: Making Every Contact Count' (MECC) is part of Ireland's national policy to support the prevention of chronic disease by promoting health behaviour change. This is being implemented as a programme within the Irish Health Service and is also being delivered, for the first time in undergraduate medical, allied health and nursing/midwifery education by tertiary education institutes. DESIGN Qualitative descriptive research. METHODS Purposeful sampling was used to recruit participants (n = 17) from an undergraduate nursing/midwifery programme (n = 131) in one tertiary level Irish institution. Four focus groups were undertaken by two members of the research team, who were not part of the module teaching team. Each focus group was guided by a semi-structured interview guide, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic data analysis was undertaken. RESULTS Three main themes were identified, namely: Building foundations and making connections; Personal responsibility and the Ah factor: now I understand. CONCLUSION Findings indicate that students had a positive learning experience whilst also highlighting the students' transition to lifelong learning encompassing adult learning and personal responsibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dympna Tuohy
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Sciences Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland.
| | - Anne Fahy
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Sciences Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland.
| | - Louise Murphy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Áras Moyola, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Making Every Contact Count and Healthy Conversation Skills as very brief or brief behaviour change interventions: a scoping review. J Public Health (Oxf) 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s10389-021-01653-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
To identify and map the available evidence regarding the implementation of Making Every Contact Count and/or Healthy Conversation Skills for both staff delivering and service users receiving the brief or very brief intervention/s.
Methods
A scoping review approach was used to rapidly map and provide an overview of the relevant literature, identify gaps in knowledge, and inform further, related research. Articles investigating experiences, perceptions and impact of Making Every Contact Count and/or Healthy Conversation Skills were included. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies were eligible for inclusion, as were reviews and reports.
Results
Twenty-two articles were included in total. Healthy Conversation Skills training was found to be acceptable, and had a positive impact on staff confidence and competence in supporting behaviour change, across studies. Some positive effects of intervention exposure on the sedentary behaviour and dietary quality of service users were evidenced. Changes in confidence following Making Every Contact Count training were varied, as was perceived acceptability of the intervention for staff. Two studies highlighted positive impacts of the intervention on service user health; however, statistical significance was not reported. The perceived barriers and facilitators of implementation for both interventions mapped mostly to ‘Environmental Context and Resources’ on the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Conclusion
Healthy Conversation Skills is an acceptable and effective behaviour change intervention that could provide a consistent approach to Making Every Contact Count training and evaluation. Further research is warranted to evaluate this approach for more staff and service user groups.
Collapse
|
11
|
Hollis JL, Kocanda L, Seward K, Collins C, Tully B, Hunter M, Foureur M, Lawrence W, MacDonald-Wicks L, Schumacher T. The impact of Healthy Conversation Skills training on health professionals' barriers to having behaviour change conversations: a pre-post survey using the Theoretical Domains Framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:880. [PMID: 34452634 PMCID: PMC8394191 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06893-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Changing people’s behaviour by giving advice and instruction, as traditionally provided in healthcare consultations, is usually ineffective. Healthy Conversation Skills (HCS) training enhances health professionals’ communication skills and ability to empower and motivate people in health behaviour change. Guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), this study examined the impact of HCS training on health professional barriers to conducting behaviour change conversations in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Secondary aims were to i) identify health professionals’ barriers to having behaviour change conversations, and explore the ii) effect of HCS training on health professionals’ competence and attitudes to adopting HCS, iii) feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of using HCS in their clinical and non-clinical roles, and iv) acceptability and quality of HCS training. Methods HCS training was conducted in October-November 2019 and February 2020. Pre-training (T1), post-training (T2) and follow-up (T3; 6-10 weeks post-training) surveys collected data on demographics and changes in competence, confidence, importance and usefulness (10-point Likert scale, where 10 = highest score) of conducting behaviour change conversations. Validated items assessing barriers to having these conversations were based on eight TDF domains. Post-training acceptability and quality of training was assessed. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics, and differences between TDF domain scores at the specific time points were analysed using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. Results Sixty-four participants consented to complete surveys (97% women; 16% identified as Aboriginal), with 37 employed in clinical settings and 27 in non-clinical settings. The training improved scores for the TDF domains of skills (T1: median (interquartile range) = 4.7(3.3-5.3); T3 = 5.7(5.3-6.0), p < 0.01), belief about capabilities (T1 = 4.7(3.3-6.0); T3 = 5.7(5.0-6.0), p < 0.01), and goals (T1 = 4.3(3.7-5.0); T3 = 4.7(4.3-5.3), p < 0.01) at follow-up. Competence in using ‘open discovery questions’ increased post-training (T1 = 25% of responses; T2 = 96% of responses; T3 = 87% of responses, p < 0.001), as did participants’ confidence for having behaviour change conversations (T1 = 6.0(4.7-7.6); T2 = 8.1(7.1-8.8), p < 0.001), including an increased confidence in having behaviour change conversations with Aboriginal clients (T1 = 5.0(2.7-6.3); T2 = 7.6(6.4-8.3), p < 0.001). Conclusions Provision of additional support strategies to address intentions; memory, attention and decision processes; and behavioural regulation may enhance adoption and maintenance of HCS in routine practice. Wider implementation of HCS training could be an effective strategy to building capacity and support health professionals to use a person-centred, opportunistic approach to health behaviour change. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06893-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna L Hollis
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. .,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. .,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. .,Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Lucy Kocanda
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Rural Health, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsty Seward
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Clare Collins
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Belinda Tully
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mandy Hunter
- Hunter New England Local Health District Nursing and Midwifery Services, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maralyn Foureur
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wendy Lawrence
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,NIHR, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Lesley MacDonald-Wicks
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tracy Schumacher
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Rural Health, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bright D, Gray BJ, Kyle RG, Bolton S, Davies AR. Factors influencing initiation of health behaviour conversations with patients: Cross-sectional study of nurses, midwives, and healthcare support workers in Wales. J Adv Nurs 2021; 77:4427-4438. [PMID: 34235759 PMCID: PMC8518752 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Aim To identify factors influencing healthcare professionals’ engagement in health behaviour conversations with patients. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Methods Between April and June 2019, an online survey of 1338 nurses, midwives and healthcare support workers was conducted. The survey assessed whether staff felt comfortable initiating health behaviour conversations with patients about five behaviours (reducing alcohol intake; stop smoking; being more active; reducing their weight; and improving their diet) and barriers to conversation initiation. Health professionals’ own health‐related behaviours, self‐rated health and mental wellbeing, and socio‐demographic characteristics were recorded. Logistic regression models were built to assess factors associated with feeling comfortable initiating health behaviour conversations for each topic. Result Less than 50% of respondents reported feeling comfortable initiating health behaviour conversations with patients. Female staff, young professionals (18 to 29 years), those in lower staff grades and those with poorer health and low mental wellbeing were less likely to report feeling comfortable having health behaviour conversations across all topics. Those who did not adhere to physical activity and dietary guidelines were less likely to initiate a conversation about being more active and having a healthy diet, respectively. Not having time to discuss the topic, suitable space to hold a conversation, and feeling worried about offending/upsetting patients were the main barriers reported. Conclusion Around 6 in 10 members of the nursing, midwifery and healthcare support workforce in Wales potentially do not feel comfortable to initiate a health behaviour conversation with patients about health and wellbeing. Feeling less comfortable to initiate a conversation was associated with staff demographics and organizational factors. Impact We identified those less likely to initiate health behaviour conversations as well as personal and organizational barriers to initiation. This will help to target and tailor interventions to ensure staff are equipped and enabled to hold health behaviour conversations with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Bright
- Knowledge Directorate, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | - Sian Bolton
- Knowledge Directorate, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Joseph S, Hart J, Chisholm A, Robinson S, Goldthorpe J, Peters S. A feasibility and acceptability study of an e-training intervention to facilitate health behaviour change conversations in dental care settings. Br Dent J 2021:10.1038/s41415-021-2722-8. [PMID: 33707733 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-2722-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Health behaviours result in oral health problems. Behaviour change techniques, informed by behaviour science, are rarely utilised by dental care professionals (DCPs) within routine care.Aim To develop a theory-informed intervention to support DCPs' behaviour change conversations and evaluate its feasibility and acceptability.Intervention A behaviour change toolkit (Toothpicks) comprising 33 behaviour change techniques relevant to dentistry, delivered within an interactive online course.Design Development and mixed-methods evaluation of the intervention.Materials and methods Participants' motivation to discuss behaviour change with patients was measured before and after training using a validated questionnaire. Acceptability was assessed through semi-structured interviews.Results DCPs' (N = 32) motivation increased significantly post-training. Participants found the training acceptable and reported subsequently implementing techniques into their practice. Potential barriers preventing implementation to clinical practice include perceived lack of opportunities to effect change within the constraints of the clinical context.Conclusions Acceptable theory-informed training that is acceptable and accessible can be developed that increases DCPs' motivation to discuss behaviour change with patients. Further research is necessary to establish the longer-term impact of brief behaviour change training on DCPs' clinical practice and patient health behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Joseph
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jo Hart
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Anna Chisholm
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK
| | - Sarah Robinson
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Joanna Goldthorpe
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Sarah Peters
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Keyworth C, Epton T, Goldthorpe J, Calam R, Armitage CJ. Patients' experiences of behaviour change interventions delivered by general practitioners during routine consultations: A nationally representative survey. Health Expect 2021; 24:819-832. [PMID: 33662180 PMCID: PMC8235898 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Consistent with the ‘Making Every Contact Count’ UK public health policy, general practitioners (GPs) are expected to provide patients with behaviour change interventions opportunistically. However, there is a belief widely held among GPs that patients neither want or need such interventions. We aimed to understand the following: (a) the characteristics of people attending GP appointments, (b) patients' needs for health behaviour change, (c) perceptions of appropriateness and helpfulness of interventions, and (d) factors associated with recall of receipt of interventions. Methods Cross‐sectional nationally representative online survey of UK adults who had attended GP clinics in the preceding four weeks (n = 3028). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. Results 94.5% (n = 2862) of patients breached at least one health behaviour guideline, and 55.1% reported never having had a conversation with their GP about health behaviours. The majority of patients perceived intervention as appropriate (range 84.2%‐87.4% across behaviours) and helpful (range 82.8%‐85.9% across behaviours). Being male (OR = 1.412, 95% CI 1.217, 1.639), having a long‐term condition (OR = 1.514, 95% CI 1.287, 1.782) and a higher number of repeat GP visits (OR = 1.016, 95% CI 1.010, 1.023) were among factors associated with recall of receipt of interventions. Conclusions Patients perceived behaviour change intervention during routine GP consultations as appropriate and helpful, yet there are variations in the likelihood of receiving interventions according to sociodemographic factors. GPs could adopt a more proactive approach to behaviour change in patient consultations with the broad approval of patients. Patient or public contribution The questionnaire was piloted among a convenience sample prior to distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Keyworth
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Divisional of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Tracy Epton
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Divisional of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Joanna Goldthorpe
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Divisional of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Calam
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Divisional of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christopher J Armitage
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Divisional of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|