Stroke follow-up in primary care: a discourse study on the discharge summary as a tool for knowledge transfer and collaboration

Legitimizing incapacity: discursive choices in Norwegian sickness certificates

BACKGROUND

In Norway's welfare system, General Practitioners (GPs) issue sickness certificates (SCs) to document patient's inability to work. These documents serve a dual role as medical evidence and as a basis for social welfare decisions. The language used in SCs can shape how non-medical stakeholders perceive a patient's work capacity. This study examines how SC language constructs narratives of work ability, focusing on how it portrays patients' limitations and prospects for recovery.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative discourse analysis of 155 SCs written by Norwegian GPs for patients under 35 years old with common mental health conditions. We focused on certificates issued around week 39 of the patient's sick leave. Using discourse analysis techniques, we examined linguistic features that convey the patient's work capacity and functional limitations.

RESULTS

SCs predominantly emphasized incapacity and the necessity of work absence through discursive choices such as definitive language, amplified descriptions, and rhetorical strategies reinforcing limitations. Recovery potential was presented with tentative language, reflecting uncertainty in prognosis, while the temporal dimension of treatment was frequently framed as a barrier to returning to work. Additionally, the use of specialized terminology, generalized label, and elliptical constructions placed a significant interpretative burden on non-medical readers. Furthermore, SCs largely lacked explicit recommendations for workplace accommodations or interdisciplinary collaboration, limiting their utility in facilitating structured return-to-work strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Time constraints, administrative pressures, and the dual roles of GPs as clinicians and bureaucrats shape the entire production of SCs. In turn, these discursive choices often reinforce narratives of incapacity. Enhancing SC relevance through structural modifications and interdisciplinary collaboration, including employer involvement in evaluating workplace accommodations, could improve welfare assessments and support tailored reintegration strategies. Positioning SCs as collaborative tools - rather than standalone assessments - may better align clinical evaluations with workplace realities and foster shared accountability for recovery and return-to-work efforts. SCs seem to place a disproportionate burden on GPs to translate medical conditions into work-related recommendations, often without the support or expertise required for such interdisciplinary evaluations.

Structured follow-up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): Feasibility study and process evaluation

BACKGROUND

Care following transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke is variable and often leaves patients feeling abandoned and uncertain. We developed a theoretically-informed, multifaceted intervention which comprised nurse-led, structured follow-up at 4 weeks after TIA/minor stroke to identify and address patient needs. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of both the intervention and procedures to inform a future randomised controlled trial.

METHOD

We conducted a multicentre, randomised feasibility study with mixed-methods process evaluation (ISRCTN registry reference: ISRCTN39864003). We collected patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1, 12 and 24 weeks and clinical data at baseline and 24 weeks. The process evaluation comprised qualitative interviews with a sub-sample, feedback questionnaires, and observations of intervention delivery.

RESULTS

We recruited 54 patients over 12 months, achieving 90% of the target sample size (n = 60). PROMs return rates were 94.4% (51/54), 85.2% (46/54) and 71.1% (27/38) at 1, 12, and 24-weeks, respectively. Intervention fidelity was high and the intervention largely aligned with the theoretical underpinnings. The process evaluation illustrated how patients benefitted from the intervention through support they would not have received through usual care. This included direct referral or signposting to support services, information and education, actionable advice, and reassurance about and normalisation of recovery. The trial design was feasible and acceptable for both patients and clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Nurse-led, structured follow-up after TIA and minor stroke is feasible, acceptable and valued by patients and clinicians. Our intervention can identify and help address unmet needs. A definitive randomised trial to evaluate intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is feasible and acceptable.

Are physiotherapists and occupational therapists following the guidelines for discharge summary?-An analysis of the content of physiotherapists' and occupational therapists' discharge summaries and their adherence to stroke guideline recommendations

PURPOSE

Discharge summaries are important tools for communication between health care levels and can ensure continuity of rehabilitation. This study aims to gain insight into the content of discharge summaries written by hospital physiotherapists and occupational therapists regarding patients with stroke, and their adherence to recommended criteria for discharge summaries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

31 physiotherapy and multidisciplinary discharge summaries, for stroke patients discharged home from hospital with need of follow-up, were included in the study. We employed qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics to explore and describe the content.

RESULTS

The physiotherapists and occupational therapists adhered to the recommended criteria for content in varying degree. The main focus for physiotherapists and occupational therapists were description of ADL, sensorimotor and general cognitive functions, they rarely report tolerance to exercise, and the specific cognitive abilities to follow instruction and learn were often omitted. Less focus was put on patients' experiences and needs during acute stroke, and description of goals were omitted in the physiotherapy discharge summaries.

CONCLUSION

While the physiotherapists and occupational therapists complement each other in their assessment of patients and inform the reader about both sensorimotor and cognitive functions and abilities, they omit some of the specific criteria for rehabilitation. Despite the omissions, the information provided is specific to the patients' function and needs.

Timing of stroke survivors' hospital readmissions to guide APRNs in primary care

BACKGROUND

Caring for patients after a neurovascular incident is common for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs). Most neurological readmission studies focus on a small subset of neurovascular incident groups, but advanced practice nurses in primary care attend to a diverse neurovascular population and lack time to adequately search hospital records.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine readmission risk factors after a neurovascular incident to guide APRNs in the primary care setting.

METHODOLOGY

The study is a retrospective observational study that used a crude single predictor model to determine potential risks for readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 876 neurovascular participants were studied. Of these, only 317 experienced at least one hospital readmission, with 703 readmissions within 1 year, indicating some were readmitted more than once. Risks for readmission varied across neurovascular events. The main reasons for readmission were because of neurological, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke readmission rates are high and require intervention by APRNs. To prevent readmission includes timely follow-up within 30 days and should also include longitudinal follow-up beyond 90 days to prevent hospital readmission.

IMPLICATIONS

Future studies are needed to create guidelines for APRNs that implement rehabilitation strategies to decrease hospital readmission for the neurovascular population that focus on interdisciplinary communication.

Put on the sidelines of palliative care: a qualitative study of important barriers to GPs' participation in palliative care and guideline implementation in Norway

BACKGROUND

Demographic changes, the evolvement of modern medicine and new treatments for severe diseases, increase the need for palliative care services. Palliative care includes all patients with life-limiting conditions, irrespective of diagnosis. In Norway, palliative care rests on a decentralised model where patient care can be delivered close to the patient's home, and the Norwegian guideline for palliative care describes a model of care resting on extensive collaboration. Previous research suggests that this guideline is not well implemented among general practitioners (GPs). In this study, we aim to investigate barriers to GPs' participation in palliative care and implementation of the guideline.

METHODS

We interviewed 25 GPs in four focus groups guided by a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed qualitatively with reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We identified four main themes as barriers to GPs' participation in palliative care and to implementation of the guideline: (1) different established local cultures and practices of palliative care, (2) discontinuity of the GP-patient relationship, (3) unclear clinical handover and information gaps and (4) a mismatch between the guideline and everyday general practice.

CONCLUSION

Significant structural and individual barriers to GPs' participation in palliative care exist, which hamper the implementation of the guideline. GPs should be involved as stakeholders when guidelines involving them are created. Introduction of new professionals in primary care needs to be actively managed to avoid inappropriate collaborative practices. Continuity of the GP-patient relationship must be maintained throughout severe illness and at end-of-life.

Allocating municipal services to individuals with complex rehabilitation needs - a discourse analysis of individual administrative decision letters

BACKGROUND

Rehabilitation is considered paramount for enhancing quality of life and reducing healthcare costs. As a result of healthcare reforms, Norwegian municipalities have been given greater responsibility for allocating rehabilitation services following discharge from hospital. Individual decision letters serve as the basis for implementing services and they have been described as information labels on the services provided by the municipality. They play an important role in planning and implementing the services in collaboration with the individual applicants. Research indicates that the implementation of policies may lead to unintended consequences, as individuals receiving municipal services perceive them as fragmented. This perception is characterised by limited user involvement and a high focus on body functions. The aim of this study was to examine how municipal decision letters about service allocation incorporate the recommendations made in the official national guideline and reflect a holistic approach to rehabilitation, coordination and user involvement for individuals with comprehensive needs.

METHODS

The decision letters of ten individuals with moderate to severe brain injury allocating rehabilitation services in two municipalities were examined. It was assessed whether the content was in accordance with the authorities' recommendations, and a discourse analysis was conducted using four tools adapted from an established integrated approach.

RESULTS

The letters primarily contained standard texts concerning legal and administrative regulations. They were predominantly in line with the official guideline to municipal service allocation. From a rehabilitation perspective, the focus was mainly on medically oriented care, scarcely referring to psychosocial needs, activity, and participation. The intended user involvement seemed to vary between active and passive status, while the coordination of services was given limited attention.

CONCLUSIONS

The written decision letters did fulfil legal and administrative recommendations for service allocation. However, they did not fulfil their potential to serve as a means of conveying rehabilitation issues, such as specification of the allocated services, a holistic approach to health, coordination, or the involvement of users in decision processes. These elements must be incorporated throughout the allocation process if the policies are to be implemented as intended. Findings can have international relevance for discussions between clinicians and policy makers.

Healthcare Professionals' Experiences with Functional Independence Measure (FIM) as a Structured Framework for Interprofessional Team Meetings in Danish Stroke Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Cross-Sectoral Collaborative Study

Purpose

An ethnographic and phenomenological mapping of the experiences of healthcare professionals with the functional independence measure (FIM) in stroke rehabilitation.

Methods

This is a cross-sectoral qualitative study with triangulation of data from two focus group interviews, 15 individual interviews, and 11 participant observations of FIM assessments performed by six different healthcare professions in interprofessional teams. FIM assessments were performed at hospital and in a community rehabilitation centre as interprofessional meetings with a local facilitator certified in FIM.

Results

Three overarching themes, learning space, improved interprofessional collaboration, and transferability, emerged from the data. The use of FIM within the provided structures established an environment that allowed the various healthcare professionals (HCP) to learn with, about, and from each other. This is perceived as promoting interprofessional collaboration and enhancing patient-specific knowledge within the interprofessional team. The established patient-specific knowledge is specific to the individual team and is difficult to transfer intraorganisationally and across sectors.

Conclusion

FIM was a catalyst for improved interprofessional knowledge transfer and interprofessional collaboration within the individual teams, but intraorganisational and cross-sectoral dissemination of patient-specific knowledge was limited.

The healthcare needs and general practice utilization of people with acquired neurological disability and complex needs: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

For people with acquired neurological disabilities and complex needs, general practitioners (GPs) play an important role in health management and early intervention for the prevention of comorbidities and health complications. People with disability are a vulnerable group who need and have the right to, quality general practice services. It is therefore important to understand the health needs and service use of this group. The aim of this review was to identify the healthcare needs and general practice utilization of people with acquired neurological disabilities and complex needs.

METHODS

A scoping review methodological framework was utilized. Six databases (MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library) were searched. Articles were included if they reported on general practice service utilization of people with acquired neurological disabilities and complex needs aged between 18 and 65. Articles were required to be peer-reviewed, written in English and published between 2010 and 2021.

RESULTS

Thirty-one articles were included in the review. Studies originated from Canada (9), the United States (8), Australia (4), Switzerland (4), the United Kingdom (2), England (1), Norway (1), France (1) and Denmark (1). For many people, GPs were the main healthcare provider. People with disability consult multiple healthcare providers and navigate complex healthcare systems. Commonly presented healthcare needs were bladder, bowel and skin problems, pain and chronic pain, medication needs and mental health concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

People with acquired neurological disabilities and complex needs were vulnerable to receiving suboptimal healthcare. The literature highlighted issues regarding the accessibility of services, the fragmentation of health services and inadequate preventative care. GPs were challenged to offer adequate disability-related expertise and to meet the mental health needs of people with disability within time constraints.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

This manuscript was prepared in collaboration with a GP, who is one of the authors. A person with lived experience of acquired neurological disability was engaged to check the alignment of the findings with their personal experience and provide feedback.

The impact of stroke, cognitive function and post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) on healthcare utilisation in Ireland: a cross-sectional nationally representative study

Background

Cognitive impairment after stroke is associated with poorer health outcomes and increased need for long-term care. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of stroke, cognitive function and post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) on healthcare utilisation in older adults in Ireland.

Methods

This cross-sectional study involved secondary data analysis of 8,175 community-dwelling adults (50 + years), from wave 1 of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Participants who had been diagnosed with stroke by a doctor were identified through self-report in wave 1. Cognitive function was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The main outcome of the study was healthcare utilisation, including General Practitioner (GP) visits, emergency department visits, outpatient clinic visits, number of nights admitted to hospital, and use of rehabilitation services. The data were analysed using multivariate adjusted negative binomial regression and logistic regression. Incidence-rate ratios (IRR), odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented.

Results

The adjusted regression analyses were based on 5,859 participants who completed a cognitive assessment. After adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, stroke was independently associated with an increase in GP visits [IRR (95% CI): 1.27 (1.07, 1.50)], and outpatient service utilisation [IRR: 1.49 (1.05, 2.12)]. Although participants with poor cognitive function also visited the GP more frequently than participants with normal cognitive function [IRR: 1.07 (1.04, 1.09)], utilisation of outpatient services was lower in this population [IRR: 0.92 (0.88, 0.97)]. PSCI was also associated with a significant decrease in outpatient service utilisation [IRR: 0.75 (0.57, 0.99)].

Conclusions

Stroke was associated with higher utilisation of GP and outpatient services. While poor cognitive function was also associated with more frequent GP visits, outpatient service utilisation was lower in participants with poor cognitive function, indicating that cognitive impairment may be a barrier to outpatient care. In Ireland, the lack of appropriate neurological or cognitive rehabilitation services appears to result in significant unaddressed need among individuals with cognitive impairment, regardless of stroke status.

Factors influencing follow-up care post-TIA and minor stroke: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

Background

Follow-up care after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke has been found to be sub-optimal, with individuals often feeling abandoned. We aimed to explore factors influencing holistic follow-up care after TIA and minor stroke.

Methods

Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 24 healthcare providers (HCPs): 5 stroke doctors, 4 nurses, 9 allied health professionals and 6 general practitioners. Participants were recruited from three TIA clinics, seven general practices and one community care trust in the West Midlands, England. Interview transcripts were deductively coded using the Theoretical Domains Framework and themes were generated from coded data.

Results

There was no clear pathway for supporting people with TIA or minor stroke after rapid specialist review in hospital; consequently, these patients had limited access to HCPs from all settings (‘Environmental context and resources’). There was lack of understanding of potential needs post-TIA/minor stroke, in particular residual problems such as anxiety/fatigue (‘Knowledge’). Identification and management of needs was largely influenced by HCPs’ perceived role, professional training (‘Social professional role and identity’) and time constraints (‘Environmental context and resources’). Follow-up was often passive – with onerous on patients to seek support – and predominantly focused on acute medical management (‘Intentions’/‘Goal’).

Conclusions

Follow-up care post-TIA/minor stroke is currently sub-optimal. Through identifying factors which influence follow-up, we can inform guidelines and practical strategies to improve holistic healthcare.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07607-0.

Transition of care in stroke patients discharged home: a single-center prospective cohort study

Introduction

Approximately two-thirds of the patients admitted to the hospital with an ischemic stroke are discharged directly home. Discontinuity of care may result in avoidable patient harm, re-admissions and even death. We hypothesized that the transfer of information is most essential in this patient group since any future care for these patients relies solely on the information that is available to the care provider responsible at that time.

Aim

The objective of this study was to evaluate the continuity of transmural care in ischemic stroke patients by assessing 1) the transfer of clinical information through discharge letters to general practitioners (GPs), 2) subsequent documentation of this information and early follow-up by GPs and 3) the documentation of medication-related information in discharge letters, at GPs and community pharmacies (CPs).

Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted from September 2019 through March 2020 in OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in patients with a first stroke discharged directly home. Outcome measures were derived from national guidelines and regional agreements. Results were analyzed using descriptive analysis.

Results

A total of 33 patients were included. Discharge letters (n = 33) and outpatient clinic letters (n = 24) to GPs contained most of the essential items, but 16% (n = 9) of the letters were sent in time. GPs (n = 31) infrequently adhered to guidelines since 10% (n = 3) of the diagnoses were registered using the correct code and 55% (n = 17) of the patients received follow-up shortly after discharge. Medication overviews were inaccurately communicated to GPs since 62% (n = 150) of all prescriptions (n = 243) were correctly noted in the discharge letter. Further loss of information was seen as only 39% (n = 95) of all prescriptions were documented correctly in GP overviews. We found that 59% (n = 144) of the prescriptions were documented correctly in CP overviews.

Conclusion

In this study, we found that discontinuity of care occurred to a varying extent throughout transmural care in patients with a first stroke who were discharged home.