Exploring factors associated with hepatitis B screening in a multilingual and diverse population

Feasibility and Acceptability of Universal Adult Screening for Chronic Hepatitis B in Primary Care Clinics

Introduction

Two thirds of Americans infected with chronic hepatitis B are unaware of their infection. In March 2023, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended moving from risk-based to universal adult chronic hepatitis B screening. In April 2022, Stanford implemented chronic hepatitis B universal screening discussion alerts for primary care providers.

Methods

After 6 months, the authors surveyed 143 primary care providers at 13 Stanford primary care clinics about universal chronic hepatitis B screening acceptability and implementation feasibility. They conducted semistructured interviews with 15 primary care providers and 5 medical assistants around alerts and chronic hepatitis B universal versus risk-based screening.

Results

Forty-five percent of surveyed primary care providers responded. A total of 63% reported that universal screening would identify more patients with chronic hepatitis B. Before implementation, 77% ordered 0-5 chronic hepatitis B screenings per month. After implementation, 71% ordered >6 screenings per month. A total of 66% shared that universal screening removed the stigma around discussing high-risk behaviors. Interview themes included (1) low clinical burden, (2) current underscreening of at-risk groups, (3) providers preferring universal screening, (4) patients accepting universal screening, and (5) ease of chronic hepatitis B alert implementation.

Conclusions

Consistent with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, implementing universal chronic hepatitis B screening in primary care clinics in Northern California was feasible, was acceptable to providers and patients, eased health maintenance burdens, and improved clinic workflows.

Assessing Physicians' Recommendations for Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Testing Among Minority Populations in Greater Philadelphia and New York City

Deaths from liver cancer are on the rise and disproportionately affect minority racial/ethnic groups. In this study, we examined associations between physicians' recommendations for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors among minority populations in the areas of Greater Philadelphia and New York City. Using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation, we evaluated potential associations for 576 Hispanic American (HA), African American (AA), and Asian Pacific American (APA) adults, using blood tests as an outcome measure, with adjustment for sociodemographic factors We found that APAs (34.2%) were most likely to have a physician recommend HBV and HCV screening tests (34.2% and 27.1%, respectively), while HAs were least likely to receive an HBV recommendation (15.0%) and AAs were least likely to receive an HCV recommendation (15.3%). HAs were significantly likely to have never received a blood test for either HBV or HCV (RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.49). APAs were significantly more likely to receive a screening recommendation for HBV (RR = 1.10, 95%CI: 1.01, 1.20) and to have a blood test (RR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.33). Our findings show that, among HAs, AAs, and APAs, physician recommendations are strongly associated with patients undergoing blood tests for HBV and HCV and that minority populations should increasingly be recommended to screen for HBV and HCV, especially given their elevated risk.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Characteristics and Care Patterns of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in the United States

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) disproportionately impacts foreign-born patients and those of Asian or Black race. Given the paucity of data, we aimed to study the impact of race and ethnicity on CHB patient characteristics and management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of adult CHB patients using data recorded in the deidentified Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Database (January 2003‒March 2021) was performed. We characterized and examined the rates of receiving adequate treatment evaluation (measuring hepatitis B virus DNA and alanine transaminase) and hepatitis B virus treatment among the racial and ethnic groups.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 42,140 patients: age, 51.9 ± 15.1 years; 56.1% male; 47% Asian; 26% White; 11% Black; and 7% Hispanic. Thirty-three percent of White and 48% of Asian patients had an annual household income greater than $100,000 US compared with 16% for Black and 25% for Hispanic patients (P < .001), with similar disparities in educational levels. Approximately one third of White (29.3%), Black (35.1%), and Hispanic (35.4%), and half of Asian (49.9%) patients received adequate evaluation (P < .001). Among patients who met American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases treatment criteria, treatment rates were similar among White (60.8%; P = .09) and Black (62.8%; P = .48), but lower among Hispanic (54.7%; P = .03), as compared with Asian patients (65.4%). On multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, provider type, viral co-infection, and fatty liver disease, Hispanic patients were less likely to receive treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53‒0.91; P = .01) compared with Asian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with Asian CHB patients, non-Asian patients were less likely to undergo adequate evaluation and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive treatment for CHB. Additional efforts are needed to improve CHB management, especially for non-Asian patients.