Measuring treatment attrition at various stages of engagement in Opioid Agonist Treatment in Ontario Canada using a cascade of care framework

Assessment of treatment retention rates and predictors of retention on opioid agonist treatment among adolescents

INTRODUCTION

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an effective treatment for opioid dependence syndrome in adults. However, studies on effectiveness of OAT in adolescents are limited; existing studies show varying retention rates. The present study aimed to assess OAT retention rates in adolescent patients with opioid dependence syndrome registered in a community drug treatment clinic in Delhi, India, and to analyse factors associated with retention at 1 year.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. All adolescents (n = 130) aged 10-19 years, started on OAT from January 2020 to July 2022 were included. Baseline and follow-up data was extracted from online record system maintained at the clinic. OAT retention rates at different timepoints were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to discern factors associated with one-year retention.

RESULTS

The participants' mean age was 16.9 (SD 1.4) years. Mean age of starting opioids was 14.9 (SD 2.2) years; 29.5% (n = 38) injected opioids. The 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month retention rate on OAT was 64.4%, 45.6%, 38.7% and 29% respectively. The retention rates with buprenorphine and methadone were comparable. Multivariate logistic regression showed retention for less than 12 months to be significantly associated with younger age of starting heroin, involvement in illegal activities, absenteeism from school and substance use in family.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The 12-month retention rates on OAT in adolescents is comparable to retention rates in adults. Various factors associated with early age of onset of opioid use are also associated with lower retention rates on OAT.

Hypertension treatment cascade among men and women of reproductive age group in India: analysis of National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-2021)

Background

Only a proportion of adults with hypertension are diagnosed and receive recommended prescriptions despite the availability of inexpensive and efficacious treatment. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of different stages of hypertension treatment cascade among the reproductive age groups in India at the national and state levels. We also identified the predictors of different stages of the hypertension treatment cascade.

Methods

We used the nationally representative data from National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-5. We included all the males (15-54 years) and females aged 15-49. Socio-demographic factors, anthropometric measurements, habits, comorbid conditions, and healthcare access stratified the stages of the hypertension treatment cascade among hypertensives. We used multinomial logistic regression to identify the determinants of the treatment cascade levels.

Findings

We had data from 1,267,786 individuals. The national prevalence of hypertension was 18.3% (95% CI: 18.1%-18.4%). Men (21.6%, 95% CI: 21.5%-21.7%) were found to have a higher prevalence as compared to women (14.8%, 95% CI: 14.7%-14.9%). Among hypertensive individuals, 70.5% (95% CI: 70.3%-70.7%) had ever received a BP measurement ("screened"), 34.3% (95% CI: 34.1%-34.5%) had been diagnosed prior to the survey ("aware"), 13.7% (95% CI: 13.5%-13.8%) reported taking a prescribed anti-hypertensive drug ("under treatment"), and 7.8% (95% CI: 7.7%-7.9%) had their BP under control ("controlled"). Males, illiterates, poor, never married, residents of rural areas, smokers/tobacco users, and alcoholic users were less likely to be in any of the treatment cascades.

Interpretation

The prevalence of hypertension in India is high. The "Rule of half" of hypertension does not apply to India as the proportion of people screened, aware of their hypertension status, treated, and controlled are lower than 50% at each stage. Program managers must improve access to hypertension diagnosis and treatment, especially among men in rural areas and populations with lower household wealth.

Funding

None.

What features of drug treatment programs help, or not, with access? a qualitative study of the perspectives of family members and community-based organization staff in Atlantic Canada

BACKGROUND

Withdrawal management and opioid agonist treatment (OAT) programs help to reduce some of the harms experienced by people who use substances (PWUS). There is literature on how features of drug treatment programs (e.g., policies and practices) are helpful, or not helpful, to PWUS when seeking access to, or in, treatment. There is, however, relatively little literature based on the perspectives of family members/family of choice of PWUS and community-based organization staff within the context of Atlantic Canada. This paper explored the perspectives of these two groups on what was helpful, or not, about drug treatment programs in Atlantic Canada in terms of supporting access to, and retention in, treatment.

METHODS

One-on-one qualitative telephone interviews were conducted in 2020 with the two groups. Interviews focused on government-funded withdrawal management and OAT programs. Data were coded using a qualitative data management program (ATLAS.ti) and analyzed inductively for key themes/subthemes using grounded theory techniques.

RESULTS

Fifteen family members/family of choice and 16 community-based organization staff members participated (n = 31). Participants spoke about features of drug treatment programs in various places, and noted features that were perceived as helpful (e.g., quick access), as well as not helpful (e.g., wait times, programs located far from where PWUS live). Some participants provided their perceptions of how PWUS felt when seeking or accessing treatment. A number of participants reported taking various actions to help support access to treatment, including providing transportation to programs. A few participants also provided suggestions for change to help support access and retention such as better alignment of mental health and addiction systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants highlighted several helpful and not helpful features of drug treatment programs in terms of supporting treatment access and retention. Previous studies with PWUS and in other places have reported similar features, some of which (e.g., wait times) have been reported for many years. Changes are needed to reduce barriers to access and retention including the changes recommended by study participants. It is critical that the voices of key groups, (including PWUS) are heard to ensure treatment programs in all places support access and retention.

Pharmacogenetics of Biochemically Verified Abstinence in an Opioid Agonist Therapy Randomized Clinical Trial of Methadone and Buprenorphine/Naloxone

Methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone are opioid agonist therapies for opioid use disorder treatment. Genetic factors contribute to individual differences in opioid response; however, little is known regarding genetic associations with clinical outcomes in people receiving opioid agonist therapies. Participants diagnosed with opioid use disorder, principally consisting of prescription opioids (licit or illicit), were randomized to methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone for 24 weeks of daily treatment (NCT03033732). Urine was collected at 12 biweekly study visits and analyzed for non-treatment opioids. Variants in genes involved in methadone metabolism (CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4), buprenorphine metabolism (CYP3A4 and UGT2B7), and μ-opioid receptor function (OPRM1) were genotyped and analyzed for their association with the number of non-treatment opioid-free urine screens. Primary analyses focused on the last 12 weeks (6 study visits, post-titration) of treatment among those reporting White ethnicity. Additional sensitivity and exploratory analyses were performed. Among methadone-treated participants (n = 52), the OPRM1 rs1799971 AA genotype (vs. G-genotypes, i.e., having one or two G alleles) was associated with greater opioid-free urine screens (incidence rate ratio = 5.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.43-11.26, P = 0.000023); longitudinal analyses showed a significant genotype-by-time interaction over the full 24 weeks (12 study visits, β = -0.28, 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.11, P = 0.0015). Exploratory analyses suggest an OPRM1 rs1799971 genotype effect on retention. No evidence of association was found between other genetic variants, including in metabolic variants, and non-treatment opioid-free urine screens in the methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone arms. Those with the OPRM1 rs1799971 G-genotypes may have a poorer response to methadone maintenance treatment, an effect that persisted through 24 weeks of treatment.

Canadian Addiction Treatment Centre (CATC) opioid agonist treatment cohort in Ontario, Canada

PURPOSE

The Canadian Addiction Treatment Centre (CATC) cohort was established during a period of increased provision of opioid agonist treatment (OAT), to study patient outcomes and trends related to the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) in Canada. The CATC cohort's strengths lie in its unique physician network, shared care model and event-level data, making it valuable for validation and integration studies. The CATC cohort is a valuable resource for examining OAT outcomes, providing insights into substance use trends and the impact of service-level factors.

PARTICIPANTS

The CATC cohort comprises 32 246 people who received OAT prescriptions between April 2014 and February 2021, with ongoing tri-annual updates planned until 2027. The cohort includes data from all CATC clinics' electronic medical records and includes demographic information and OAT clinical indicators.

FINDINGS TO DATE

This cohort profile describes the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients being treated in a large OAT physician network. As well, we report the longitudinal OAT retention by treatment type during a time of increasing exposure to a contaminated dangerous drug supply. Notable findings also include retention differences between methadone (32% of patients at 1 year) and buprenorphine (20% at 1 year). Previously published research from this cohort indicated that patient-level factors associated with retention include geographic location, concurrent substance use and prior treatment attempts. Service-level factors such as telemedicine delivery and frequency of urine drug screenings also influence retention. Additionally, the cohort identified rising OAT participation and a substantial increase in fentanyl use during the COVID-19 pandemic.

FUTURE PLANS

Future research objectives are the longitudinal evaluation of retention and flexible modelling techniques that account for the changes as patients are treated with OAT. Furthermore, future research aims are the use of conditional models, and linkage with provincial-level administrative datasets.

Characterizing opioid agonist therapy uptake and factors associated with treatment retention among people with HIV in British Columbia, Canada

Accidental overdoses are now the leading cause of death among people with HIV (PWH) in British Columbia (BC). We examined the utilization and retention of opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Adult PWH (≥19 years) with ≥ 1 OAT dispensation in BC between 2008 and 2020 were included (n = 1,515). OAT treatment episodes were formed based on specific criteria for slow-release oral morphine (SROM), methadone, injectable OAT (iOAT), and buprenorphine/naloxone. Retention in treatment was defined as any episode lasting ≥ 12 months. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations modeled retention-associated factors. There was a 56.6% decline in OAT retention over time. Buprenorphine treatment exhibited significantly lower odds of retention (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36-0.92) compared to methadone. Conversely, no significant change in retention odds was observed for SROM (0.72; 0.33-1.54) and iOAT (0.81; 0.31-2.12). Factors associated with increased odds of retention included a 10-year increase in age (1.69; 1.46-1.95), previous retention history (1.96; 1.40-2.73), achieving OAT therapeutic dose (8.22; 6.67-10.14), and suppressed HIV viral load (1.35; 1.10-1.67). Individuals with a lifetime HCV diagnosis receiving iOAT were more likely to retain (3.61; 1.20-10.83). Each additional year on OAT during the study period was associated with a 4% increase in the odds of retention. A significant proportion of PWH had a history of OAT prescribing but experienced low retention rates. Retention outcomes were more positive for SROM and iOAT. The association between OAT medication type and retention odds may be particularly influenced by HCV diagnosis. Optimal management of opioid use disorder among PWH, with an emphasis on attaining the therapeutic dose is crucial.

Safer opioid supply: qualitative program evaluation

BACKGROUND

As the overdose crisis in Canada continues to escalate in severity, novel interventions and programs are required. Safer Supply programs offer pharmaceutical-grade medication to people who use drugs to replace and decrease harms related to the toxic illicit drug supply. Given the paucity of research surrounding these programs, we sought to better understand the experience of being part of a Safer Supply program from the perspective of current participants.

METHODS

We completed semi-structured interviews and surveys with Safer Supply participants in Ottawa, Canada. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Descriptive statistics were used to report survey data.

RESULTS

Participants most commonly discussed Safer Supply benefits. This included programs offering a sense of community, connection, hope for the future, and increased autonomy. Participants also described program concerns, such as restrictive protocols, inadequate drugs, and diversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research demonstrated that participants found Safer Supply to be effective and impactful for their substance use goals. While participants did discuss concerns about the program, overall, we found that this is an important harm reduction-based program for people who use drugs in the midst of the overdose crisis.

Association of prescribed oral stimulants on cocaine use among patients enrolled in opioid agonist treatment: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to measure the association of prescribed oral stimulants with the consumption of cocaine among a population of patients receiving Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT).

METHODS

The study was a retrospective clinical cohort study using the medical records of all patients receiving OAT who attended treatment clinics within the Canadian Addiction Treatment Centers (CATC) in Ontario from April 2014 to February 2021. Linear mixed-effects models were fit for the exposure of prescribed oral stimulants, and the outcome of a positive urinalysis drug screen for cocaine. Covariates for age, sex, and a random effect for patients were fitted to account for differences between and within patient observations over time.

RESULTS

Among patients receiving OAT therapy n = 314 patients were prescribed oral stimulants and n = 11,879 patients were not prescribed oral stimulants among Ontario CATC clinics (n = 92, n = 145 physicians), the mean age at enrollment for patients receiving oral stimulants was 37.0, SD = 8.8, with 43.6% female patients and for patients not receiving oral stimulants mean age was 36.6, SD = 10.7, with 39.6% female patients. Linear mixed effects models showed no difference in cocaine-positive urine tests over time for fixed effects B = 0.001, however, when considering the Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the fixed effects, we found that time since the prescription of an oral stimulant was associated with a decrease of ICC = -0.14 in cocaine positive urine tests. Increasing age at prescription ICC = -0.92, and being male ICC = -0.23 were associated with decreasing cocaine-positive urine.

CONCLUSION

The use of oral stimulant prescriptions to treat cocaine use had no clinically significant benefit in a real-world setting. Patients who receive prescriptions for oral stimulants consume more cocaine before and after treatment compared to patients without an oral stimulant prescription. We also observed that cocaine use was reduced with increased time since treatment initiation.