Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with heart failure with preserved, mildly reduced, and reduced ejection fraction in Spain

[Prognostic value of electrical bioimpedance measured with a portable and wireless device in acute heart failure]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The current evaluation of acute heart failure (HF) does not allow an adequate prediction of its evolution. The electrical bioimpedance (BI) allows knowing the state of blood volume, until now only with fixed equipment. We have developed and validated a portable and wireless device to measure BI at the ankle (IVOL). The objective of the study is to know the long-term prognostic value of the point measurement of BI with IVOL in patients with acute HF.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of unselected patients admitted for acute HF in a tertiary hospital. The association between BI and different clinical, analytical and echocardiographic variables on admission and clinical evolution were analyzed.

RESULTS

76 patients were included (mean age 66.1 years, 71.1% men, 68.4% hypertensive, 34.2% diabetic, mean NT-ProBNP: 7,103 pg / ml). Of these, 52.6% with non-preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<50%) and 56.6% with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. 26.3% died during a mean follow-up of 35.8 months. Survival in patients with BI≤21,8Ω was lower, globally and in the subgroups of patients without preserved LVEF and with RV dysfunction, P<.008). In the multivariate analysis, a BI≥21.8Ω was an independent survival factor (HR: 0.242; 95% CI: 0.86-0.681; P=.007).

CONCLUSIONS

BI values measured with IVOL may be an independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients hospitalized for acute HF. This prognostic value is maintained in patients without preserved LVEF function and with RV dysfunction.

Artificial intelligence-based identification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction from 12-lead electrocardiograms: external validation and advanced application of an existing model

Aims

The diagnostic application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models to detect cardiovascular diseases from electrocardiograms (ECGs) evolves, and promising results were reported. However, external validation is not available for all published algorithms. The aim of this study was to validate an existing algorithm for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) from 12-lead ECGs.

Methods and results

Patients with digitalized data pairs of 12-lead ECGs and echocardiography (at intervals of ≤7 days) were retrospectively selected from the Heart Center Leipzig ECG and electronic medical records databases. A previously developed AI-based model was applied to ECGs and calculated probabilities for LVSD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed overall and in cohorts stratified for baseline and ECG characteristics. Repeated echocardiography studies recorded ≥3 months after index diagnostics were used for follow-up (FU) analysis. At baseline, 42 291 ECG-echocardiography pairs were analysed, and AUROC for LVSD detection was 0.88. Sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 77% for the optimal LVSD probability cut-off based on Youden's J. AUROCs were lower in ECG subgroups with tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and wide QRS complexes. In patients without LVSD at baseline and available FU, model-generated high probability for LVSD was associated with a four-fold increased risk of developing LVSD during FU.

Conclusion

We provide the external validation of an existing AI-based ECG-analysing model for the detection of LVSD with robust performance metrics. The association of false positive LVSD screenings at baseline with a deterioration of ventricular function during FU deserves a further evaluation in prospective trials.

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic narrative review of the evidence

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common condition in clinical practice, affecting more than half of patients with HF. HFpEF is associated with morbidity and mortality and with considerable healthcare resource utilization and costs. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial to facilitate prompt management, particularly initiation of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Although European guidelines define HFpEF as the presence of symptoms with or without signs of HF, left ventricular EF ≥ 50%, and objective evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities, together with elevated natriuretic peptide levels, the diagnosis of HFpEF remains challenging. First, there is no clear consensus on how HFpEF should be defined. Furthermore, diagnostic tools, such as natriuretic peptide levels and resting echocardiogram findings, are significantly limited in the diagnosis of HFpEF. As a result, some patients are overdiagnosed (i.e., elderly people with comorbidities that mimic HF), although in other cases, HFpEF is overlooked. In this manuscript, we perform a systematic narrative review of the diagnostic approach to patients with HFpEF. We also propose a comprehensible algorithm that can be easily applied in daily clinical practice and could prove useful for confirming or ruling out a diagnosis of HFpEF.

Evolution of economic burden of heart failure by ejection fraction in newly diagnosed patients in Spain

OBJECTIVE

To describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs, in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (HF) according to ejection fraction (EF) in Spain.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study that analyzed anonymized, integrated and computerised medical records in Spain. Patients with ≥ 1 new HF diagnosis between January 2013 and September 2019 were included and followed-up during a 4-year period. Rates per 100 person-years of HCRU and costs were estimated.

RESULTS

Nineteen thousand nine hundred sixty-one patients were included, of whom 43.5%, 26.3%, 5.1% and 25.1% had HF with reduced, preserved, mildly reduced and unknown EF, respectively. From year 1 to 4, HF rates of outpatient visits decreased from 1149.5 (95% CI 1140.8-1159.3) to 765.5 (95% CI 745.9-784.5) and hospitalizations from 61.7 (95% CI 60.9-62.7) to 15.7(14.7-16.7) per 100 person-years. The majority of HF-related healthcare resource costs per patient were due to hospitalizations (year 1-4: 63.3-38.2%), followed by indirect costs (year 1-4: 12.2-29.0%), pharmacy (year 1-4: 11.9-19.9%), and outpatient care (year 1-4: 12.6-12.9%). Mean (SD) per patient HF-related costs decreased from 2509.6 (3518.5) to 1234.6 (1534.1) Euros (50% cost reduction). At baseline, 70.1% were taking beta-blockers, 56.3% renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 11.8% mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and 8.9% SGLT2 inhibitors. At 12 months, these numbers were 72.3%, 65.4%, 18.9% and 9.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the economic burden of HF decreased over time since diagnosis, it is still substantial. This reduction could be partially related to a survival bias (sick patients died early), but also to a better HF management. Despite that, there is still much room for improvement.

Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics and Cause-specific Outcomes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure (HF) is a global pandemic affecting 64 million people worldwide. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has traditionally received less attention than its main counterpart, HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The incidence and prevalence of HFpEF show geographic variation and are increasing over time, soon expected to surpass those of HFrEF. Morbidity and mortality rates of HFpEF are considerable, albeit lower than those of HFrEF. This review focuses on the burden of HFpEF, providing contemporary data on epidemiology, clinical characteristics and comorbidities, cause-specific outcomes, costs and pharmacotherapy.

Differences in clinical outcomes, health care resource utilization and costs in heart failure patients according to left ventricular ejection fraction

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on health care resource utilization (HCRU) and cost in heart failure (HF) patients is not well known. We aimed to compare outcomes, HCRUs and costs according to LVEF groups.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of all patients with an emergency department (ED) visit or admission to a tertiary hospital in Spain 2018 with a primary HF diagnosis. We excluded patients with newly diagnosed heart failure. One-year clinical outcomes, costs and HCRUs were compared according to LVEF (reduced [HFrEF], mildly reduced [HFmrEF], and preserved [HFpEF]).

RESULTS

Among 1287 patients with a primary diagnosis of HF in the ED, 365 (28.4%) were discharged to home (ED group), and 919 (71.4%) were hospitalized (hospital group [HG]). In total, 190 patients (14.7%) had HFrEF, 146 (11.4%) HFmrEF, and 951 (73.9%) HFpEF. The mean age was 80.1±10.7 years; 57.1% were female. The median [interquartile range] of costs per patient/y was €1889 [259-6269] in the ED group and €5008 [2747-9589] in the HG (P <.001). Hospitalization rates were higher in patients with HFrEF in the ED group. The median costs of HFrEF per patient/y were higher in patients in both groups: €4763 [2076-17 155] vs €3900 [590-8013] for HFmrEF vs €3812 [259-5486] for HFpEF in the ED group, and €6321 [3335-796] vs €6170 [3189-10484] vs €4636 [2609-8977], respectively, in the hospital group (all P <.001). This difference was driven by the more frequent admission to intensive care units, and greater use of diagnostic and therapeutic tests among HFrEF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In HF, LVEF significantly impacts costs and HCRU. Costs were higher in patients with HFrEF, especially those requiring hospitalization, than in those with HFpEF.

Current Role of SLGT2 Inhibitors in the Management of the Whole Spectrum of Heart Failure: Focus on Dapagliflozin

Heart failure (HF) is associated with a high morbidity and mortality burden. In light of more recent evidence, SGLT2 inhibitors are currently recommended as first-line therapy in managing patients with HF, regardless of ejection fraction, to reduce HF burden. The DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials, and particularly, the pooled analysis of both studies, have shown that dapagliflozin significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular death, all-cause death, total HF hospitalizations, and MACE in the whole spectrum of HF, with sustained benefits over time. Recent data have shown that the full implementation of dapagliflozin in clinical practice would translate into a robust reduction in hospitalizations for HF and death in real-life populations. Many pathophysiological mechanisms have been involved in these benefits, particularly the positive effects of dapagliflozin on reversing cardiac (atrial and ventricular) remodeling, reducing cardiac fibrosis and inflammation, and improving endothelial dysfunction. In this manuscript, we reviewed from a practical point of view the role of dapagliflozin in the management of the whole spectrum of patients with HF.

Heart Failure Prevalence Rates and Its Association with Other Cardiovascular Diseases and Chronic Kidney Disease: SIMETAP-HF Study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Heart failure (HF) is a major health problem that causes high mortality and hospitalization rates. This study aims to determine the HF prevalence rates in populations aged both ≥18 years and ≥50 years and to assess its association with cardiovascular diseases and chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a primary care setting, with a population-based random sample of 6588 people aged 18.0-102.8 years. Crude and adjusted prevalence rates of HF were calculated. The associations of renal and cardiometabolic factors with HF were assessed in both populations using univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The HF crude prevalence rates were 2.8% (95%CI: 2.4-3.2) in adults (≥18 years), and 4.6% (95%CI: 4.0-5.3) in the population aged ≥ 50 years, without significant differences between males and females in both populations. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence rates were 2.1% (male: 1.9%; female: 2.3%) in the overall adult population, and 4.5% (male: 4.2%; female: 4.8%) in the population aged ≥ 50 years, reaching 10.0% in the population aged ≥ 70 years. Atrial fibrillation, hypertension, low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, sedentary lifestyle, and diabetes were independently associated with HF in both populations. A total of 95.7% (95%CI: 92.7-98.6) of the population with HF had an elevated cardiovascular risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports that HF prevalence increases from 4.5% in the population over 50 years to 10% in the population over 70 years. The main clinical conditions that are HF-related are sedentary lifestyle, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, low eGFR, stroke, and CHD.

Burden of Illness beyond Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Heart Failure in Spain According to Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the rates of adverse clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke, in patients newly diagnosed with HF to provide a comprehensive picture of HF burden.

METHODS

This was a retrospective and observational study, using the BIG-PAC database in Spain. Adults, newly diagnosed with HF between January 2013 and September 2019 with ≥1 HF-free year of enrolment prior to HF diagnosis, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 19,961 patients were newly diagnosed with HF (43.5% with reduced ejection fraction (EF), 26.3% with preserved EF, 5.1% with mildly reduced EF, and 25.1% with unknown EF). The mean age was 69.7 ± 19.0 years; 53.8% were men; and 41.0% and 41.5% of patients were in the New York Heart Association functional classes II and III, respectively. The baseline HF treatments included beta-blockers (70.1%), renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (56.3%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (11.8%), and SGLT2 inhibitors (8.9%). The post-index incidence rates of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and both combined were 102.2 (95% CI 99.9-104.5), 123.1 (95% CI 120.5-125.7), and 182 (95% CI 178.9-185.1) per 1000 person-years, respectively. The rates of myocardial infarction and stroke were lower (26.2 [95% CI 25.1-27.4] and 19.8 [95% CI 18.8-20.8] per 1000 person-years, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In Spain, patients newly diagnosed with HF have a high risk of clinical outcomes. Specifically, the rates of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization are high and substantially greater than the rates of myocardial infarction and stroke. Given the burden of adverse outcomes, these should be considered targets in the comprehensive management of HF. There is much room for improving the proportion of patients receiving disease-modifying therapies.