Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing mortality in restrictive and liberal haemoglobin thresholds for red cell transfusion: an overview of systematic reviews

Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Thresholds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis

Background/Objectives: Anemia is common in critically ill patients, yet red blood cell (RBC) transfusion without active bleeding does not consistently improve outcomes and carries risks such as pulmonary injury, fluid overload, and increased costs. Optimal transfusion thresholds remain debated, with some guidelines recommending a restrictive target of 7 g/dL instead of a more liberal target of 9 g/dL. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS from January 1995 to October 2024. Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 13,705 critically ill adults were included, with 6855 assigned to liberal and 6850 to restrictive transfusion strategies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, and the pooled effect sizes were estimated with a random-effects model. We registered the protocol in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CDR42024589225). Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in 30-day mortality between restrictive and liberal strategies (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.25; I2 = 49%). Similarly, no significant differences emerged for the 90-day or 180-day mortality, hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, dialysis requirement, or incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, patients in the restrictive group received significantly fewer RBC units. The trial sequential analysis (TSA) indicated that the evidence accrued was insufficient to definitively confirm or exclude an effect on the 30-day mortality, as the required sample size was not reached. Conclusions: In conclusion, while our meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference in the short-term mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies, larger trials are needed to fully determine whether any clinically meaningful difference exists in critically ill populations.

Exploring the Intersection of Blood Transfusion and Same-Day Computed Tomography Imaging: An Overview of Clinical Risks and Practices

The use of transfusions, whether involving whole blood or specific blood components, is essential for managing various clinical conditions. Many cases are acute, often requiring post-transfusion imaging evaluation. While there is no absolute contraindication for chest imaging following blood transfusion, it should be approached cautiously. We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases and registries. Research studies were limited to full-text original articles, reviews, and case reports published in English, involved human subjects, and focused on the interplay between blood transfusions and contrast-enhanced imaging. Scientific analyses were excluded if they did not focus on transfusion practices in the context of imaging or failed to address issues such as hemoglobin thresholds, transfusion reactions, or the clinical implications of contrast agents. Our research fills this gap by emphasizing the need for a cautious, multidisciplinary approach to post-transfusion computed tomography (CT) scans, especially in the presence of contrast agents. This study calls for increased awareness of the heightened risk of complications, such as autoimmune hemolysis, when both procedures are performed together. New insights from our research recommend individualized assessments and close patient monitoring when combining these interventions. Nevertheless, patients need to be hemodynamically and clinically stable before undergoing CT. Discussions. Symptoms that develop within the first 24 h post-transfusion are classified as secondary post-transfusion reactions unless proven otherwise. The prevalence of side effects from same-day CT scans and blood transfusions is challenging to quantify, as few studies focus on this combination. Transfusions and contrast-enhanced CT scans share overlapping adverse reactions and carry significant risks. Acute hemolytic red blood cell transfusion reactions are among the most frequent side effects, with a prevalence of 1:12,000-38,000. Conclusion. Our study contributes new insights to the literature by filling the gap concerning the interplay between transfusions and contrast media, paving the way for more informed clinical protocols to enhance patient safety.

Perioperative Patient Blood Management (excluding obstetrics): Guidelines from the French National Authority for Health

The French National Authority for Health (HAS) recently issued guidelines for patient blood management (PBM) in surgical procedures. These recommendations are based on three usual pillars of PBM: optimizing red cell mass, minimizing blood loss and optimizing anemia tolerance. In the preoperative period, these guidelines recommend detecting anemia and iron deficiency and taking corrective measures well in advance of surgery, when possible, in case of surgery with moderate to high bleeding risk or known preoperative anemia. In the intraoperative period, the use of tranexamic acid and some surgical techniques are recommended to limit bleeding in case of high bleeding risk or in case of hemorrhage, and the use of cell salvage is recommended in some surgeries with a major risk of transfusion. In the postoperative period, the limitation of blood samples is recommended but the monitoring of postoperative anemia must be carried out and may lead to corrective measures (intravenous iron in particular) or more precise diagnostic assessment of this anemia. A "restrictive" transfusion threshold considering comorbidities and, most importantly, the tolerance of the patient is recommended postoperatively. The implementation of a strategy and a program for patient blood management is recommended throughout the perioperative period in healthcare establishments in order to reduce blood transfusion and length of stay. This article presents an English translation of the HAS recommendations and a summary of the rationale underlying these recommendations.

Peripheral perfusion index stratifies risk in patients with intraoperative anemia: A multicentre cohort study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Evidence for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion thresholds in the intraoperative setting is limited, and current perioperative recommendations may not correspond with individual intraoperative physiological demands. Hemodynamics relevant for the decision to transfuse may include peripheral perfusion index (PPI). The objective of this prospective study was to assess the associations of PPI and hemoglobin levels with the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality.

DESIGN

Multicenter cohort study.

SETTING

Bispebjerg and Hvidovre University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark.

PATIENTS

We included 741 patients who underwent acute high risk abdominal surgery or hip fracture surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions were carried out.

MEASUREMENTS

Principal values collected included measurements of peripheral perfusion index and hemoglobin values.

METHODS

The study was conducted using prospectively obtained data on adults who underwent emergency high-risk surgery. Subjects were categorized into high vs. low subgroups stratified by pre-defined PPI levels (PPI: > 1.5 vs. < 1.5) and Hb levels (Hb: > 9.7 g/dL vs. < 9.7 g/dL). The study assessed mortality and severe postoperative complications within 90 days.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 741 patients. 90-day mortality was 21% (n = 154), frequency of severe postoperative complications was 31% (n = 231). Patients with both low PPI and low Hb had the highest adjusted odds ratio for both 90-day severe postoperative complications (2.95, [1.62-5.45]) and 90-day mortality (3.13, [1.45-7.11]). A comparison of patients with low PPI and low Hb to those with high PPI and low Hb detected significantly higher 90-day mortality risk in the low PPI and low Hb group (OR 8.6, [1.57-162.10]).

CONCLUSION

High PPI in acute surgical patients who also presents with anemia was associated with a significantly better outcome when compared with patients with both low PPI and anemia. PPI should therefore be further investigated as a potential parameter to guide intraoperative RBC transfusion therapy.

Adherence to a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy in critically ill patients: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials relatively consistently show that restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategies are safe and associated with similar outcomes compared to liberal transfusion strategies in critically ill patients. Based on these data, the general threshold for RBC transfusion was changed to 70 g/L at a 9-bed tertiary level intensive care unit in September 2020. Implementation measures included lectures, webinars and feedback during clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate how implementation of a restrictive transfusion strategy influenced RBC usage, haemoglobin trigger levels and adherence to prescribed trigger levels.

METHODS

In this registry-based, observational study, critically ill adult patients without massive bleeding were included and divided into a pre-cohort, with admissions prior to the change of transfusion strategy, and a post-cohort, with admissions following the change of transfusion strategy. These cohorts were compared regarding key RBC transfusion-related variables.

RESULTS

In total 5626 admissions were included in the analyses (pre-cohort n = 4373, post-cohort n = 1253). The median volume (interquartile range, IQR) of RBC transfusions per 100 admission days, in the pre-cohort was 6120 (4110-8110) mL versus 3010 (2890-4970) mL in the post-cohort (p < .001). This corresponds to an estimated median saving of 1128 € per 100 admission days after a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy was implemented. In total, 26% of the admissions in the pre-cohort and 19% in the post-cohort (p < .001) received RBC transfusion(s) during days 0-10. Both median (IQR) prescribed trigger levels (determined by intensivist) and actual haemoglobin trigger levels (i.e., levels prior to actual administration of transfusion) were higher in the pre- versus post-cohort (90 [80-100] vs. 80 [72-90] g/L, p < .001 and 89 [82-96] g/L vs. 83 [79-94], p < .001, respectively). Percentage of days without compliance with the prescribed transfusion trigger was higher in the pre-cohort than in the post-cohort (23% vs. 14%, p < .001). Sensitivity analyses, excluding patients with traumatic brain injury, ischemic heart disease and COVID-19 demonstrated similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a restrictive transfusion trigger in a critical care setting resulted in lasting decreased RBC transfusion use and costs, decreased prescribed and actual haemoglobin trigger levels and improved adherence to prescribed haemoglobin trigger levels.

Patient blood management in major digestive surgery: Recommendations from the Italian multisociety (ACOI, SIAARTI, SIdEM, and SIMTI) modified Delphi consensus conference

Patient blood management (PBM) is defined as the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to maintain a surgical patient’s hemoglobin concentration, optimize hemostasis, and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve the outcomes. PBM is able to reduce mortality up to 68%, reoperation up to 43%, readmission up to 43%, composite morbidity up to 41%, infection rate up to 80%, average length of stay by 16%–33%, transfusion from 10% to 95%, and costs from 10% to 84% after major surgery. It should be noticed, however, that the process of PBM implementation is still in its infancy, and that its potential to improve perioperative outcomes could be strictly linked to the degree of adherence/compliance to the whole program, with decoupling and noncompliance being significant factors for failure. Therefore, the steering committees of four major Italian scientific societies, representing general surgeons, anesthesiologists and transfusion medicine specialists (Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani; Società Italiana di Anestesia, Analgesia, Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva; Società Italiana di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare; Società Italiana di Medicina Trasfusionale e Immunoematologia), organized a joint modified Delphi consensus conference on PBM in the field of major digestive surgery (upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, and hepato-biliopancreatic resections), whose results and recommendations are herein presented.

[Special features of the perioperative course in patients with frailty syndrome]

The demographic change with an increase in the number of geriatric patients presents major challenges for perioperative medicine. Frailty is a multimorbidity complex that incorporates a combination of various factors, such as physical weakness, slower walking speed and unwanted weight loss. It is of great importance that these patients receive an individually adapted perioperative care. This includes, among others, a preoperative examination for frailty, a structured prehabilitation according to the concept of better in, better out, the compliance with the guidelines on prevention and timely treatment of postoperative delirium as well as the continuous maintenance of the body's homeostasis. By means of these measures the risk of complications in this patient group can be reduced and the best possible postoperative results can be achieved.

Multivariable statistical models to predict red cell transfusion in elective surgery

BACKGROUND

Predicting red cell transfusion may assist in identifying those most likely to benefit from patient blood management strategies. Our objective was to identify a simple statistical model to predict transfusion in elective surgery from routinely available data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our final multicentre cohort consisted of 42,546 patients and contained the following potential predictors of red cell transfusion known prior to admission: patient age, sex, pre-admission hemoglobin, surgical procedure, and comorbidities. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation methods. The outcome measure of interest was administration of a red cell transfusion. We used multivariable logistic regression models to predict transfusion, and evaluated the performance by applying a 10-fold cross-validation. Model accuracy was assessed by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. After applying an optimal probability cut-off we measured model accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

RESULTS

7.0% (n=2,993) of the study population received a red cell transfusion. Our most simple model predicted red cell transfusion based on admission hemoglobin and surgical procedure with a multiply imputed estimated area under the curve of 0.862 (0.856, 0.864). The estimated accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values at the probability cut-off of 0.4 were 0.934, 0.257, 0.986, 0.573, and 0.946 respectively.

DISCUSSION

A small number of variables available prior to admission can predict red cell transfusion with very good accuracy. Our model can be used to flag high-risk patients most likely to benefit from pre-operative patient blood management measures.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Role of Perioperative Blood Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The impact of perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on oncological outcomes after RC is not clearly established as the existing publications show conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the prognostic role of perioperative RBC transfusion on oncological outcomes after RC.

METHODS

Systematic online search on PubMed was conducted, based on PRISMA criteria for publications reporting on RBC transfusion during RC. Publications with the following criteria were included: (I) reported data on perioperative blood transfusion; (II) Reported Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% -confidence interval (CI) for the impact of transfusion on survival outcomes. Primary outcome was the impact of perioperative RBC transfusion on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Risk of bias assessment was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software.

RESULTS

From 27 primarily identified publications, 19 eligible articles including 22897 patients were selected. Perioperative RBC transfusion showed no impact on RFS (Z = 1.34; p = 0,18) and significant negative impact on CSS (Z = 2.67; p = 0.008) and OS (Z = 3.22; p = 0.001). Intraoperative RBC transfusion showed no impact on RFS (Z = 0.58; p = 0.56) and CSS (Z = 1.06; p = 0.29) and OS (Z = 1.47; p = 0.14).Postoperative RBC transfusion showed non-significant trend towards improved RFS (Z = 1.89; p = 0.06) and no impact on CSS (Z = 1.56; p = 0.12) and OS (Z = 0.53 p = 0.60).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, we found perioperative blood transfusion to be a significant predictor only for worse CSS and OS but not for RFS. This effect may be determined by differences in tumor stages and patient comorbidities for which this meta-analysis cannot control due to lack of respective raw data.

The Limits of Acute Anemia

For many years, physicians’ approach to the transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells (RBC) was not individualized. It was accepted that a hemoglobin concentration (Hb) of less than 10 g/dL was a general transfusion threshold and the majority of patients were transfused immediately. In recent years, there has been increasing evidence that even significantly lower hemoglobin concentrations can be survived in the short term without sequelae. This somehow contradicts the observation that moderate or mild anemia is associated with relevant long-term morbidity and mortality. To resolve this apparent contradiction, it must be recognized that we have to avoid acute anemia or treat it by alternative methods. The aim of this article is to describe the physiological limits of acute anemia, match these considerations with clinical realities, and then present “patient blood management” (PBM) as the therapeutic concept that can prevent both anemia and unnecessary transfusion of RBC concentrates in a clinical context, especially in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This treatment concept may prove to be the key to high-quality patient care in the ICU setting in the future.

Red blood cell volume, but not platelet or plasma volume is associated with mortality in neonatal ECMO

BACKGROUND

Blood product transfusions are necessary for critically ill neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Transfusions are administered in response to unstudied arbitrary thresholds and may be associated with adverse outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify relationships between blood product components and mortality in neonates receiving ECMO support for respiratory indications.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective review of neonates receiving ECMO for respiratory indications from 2002 to 2019 from a single quaternary-referral neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Demographic and outcome data and transfusion volume (ml/kg/day) were harvested from the medical record, and baseline mortality risk was assessed using NEO-RESCUERS scores. The association between volume of red blood cells (RBC), platelet, plasma transfusion rates (ml/kg/day), and mortality on ECMO were assessed after adjustment for NEO-RESCUERS score. Cox proportional hazards (CPH) competing risk model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each variable and mortality outcome.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 248 neonates undergoing ECMO for respiratory failure, overall survival was 93%. RBC, platelet, and plasma volume were highly associated with mortality during ECMO in an unadjusted model. After adjusting for NEO-RESCUERS score, RBC volume was associated with increased mortality risk (HR 1.013, 95% CI 1.004-1.022, p = .0043), but platelet and plasma volume were not associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

RBC, but not platelet or plasma volume, is associated with mortality in neonates on ECMO. Our findings refute previous studies demonstrating an association between platelet volume and mortality for neonates on ECMO.

Blood Conservation Techniques and Strategies in Orthopedic Anesthesia Practice

Orthopedic surgery procedures involving joint arthroplasty, complex spine, long bone and pelvis procedure, and trauma and oncological cases can be associated with a high risk of bleeding and need for blood transfusion, making efforts to optimize patient care and reduce blood loss very important. Patient blood management programs incorporate efforts to optimize preoperative anemia, develop transfusion protocols and restrictive hemoglobin triggers, advance surgical and anesthesia practice, and use antifibrinolytic therapies. Perioperative management of anticoagulant therapies, a multidisciplinary decision-making task, weighs in risks and benefits of thromboembolic risk and surgical bleeding and is patient- and surgery-specific.

Patient Blood Management: Improving Outcomes for Millions While Saving Billions. What Is Holding It Up?

Patient blood management (PBM) offers significantly improved outcomes for almost all medical and surgical patient populations, pregnant women, and individuals with micronutrient deficiencies, anemia, or bleeding. It holds enormous financial benefits for hospitals and payers, improves performance of health care providers, and supports public authorities to improve population health. Despite this extraordinary combination of benefits, PBM has hardly been noticed in the world of health care. In response, the World Health Organization (WHO) called for its 194 member states, in its recent Policy Brief, to act quickly and decidedly to adopt national PBM policies. To further support the WHO's call to action, this article addresses 3 aspects in more detail. The first is the urgency from a health economic perspective. For many years, growth in health care spending has outpaced overall economic growth, particularly in aging societies. Due to competing economic needs, the continuation of disproportionate growth in health care spending is unsustainable. Therefore, the imperative for health care leaders and policy makers is not only to curb the current spending rate relative to the gross domestic product (GDP) but also to simultaneously improve productivity, quality, safety of patient care, and the health status of populations. Second, while PBM meets these requirements on an exceptional scale, uptake remains slow. Thus, it is vital to identify and understand the impediments to broad implementation. This includes systemic challenges such as the so-called "waste domains" of failure of care delivery caused by malfunctions of health care systems, failure of care coordination, overtreatment, and low-value care. Other impediments more specific to PBM are the misperception of PBM and deeply rooted cultural patterns. Third, understanding how the 3Es-evidence, economics, and ethics-can effectively be used to motivate relevant stakeholders to take on their respective roles and responsibilities and follow the urgent call to implement PBM as a standard of care.

[Optimal oxygen administration-new evidence from treating COVID-19?]

Oxygen is essential for energy production and thus for the survival of human cells. If oxygen delivery is disrupted due to illness, injury or changes in environmental factors, the human body is to a certain extent able to activate compensatory mechanisms to ensure adequate delivery of oxygen for the function and integrity of the cells and organ systems. If these compensatory mechanisms are exhausted or overloaded, there is a risk of functional failure of cells and organ systems. In clinical practice, it is often difficult to decide whether the body's own compensation mechanisms are still sufficient or whether more invasive therapy options and their side effects should be used to prevent organ damage. The aim of this review is to reiterate the basic physiological mechanisms of oxygen delivery to cells, to show how insufficient oxygen can be detected, and to highlight the current state of studies and guidelines on target oxygen levels. Although the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought recent attention to the pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies of oxygenation disorders, little new knowledge regarding oxygen targets has emerged from this pandemic. Thus, the previously recommended oxygen target values remain unchanged.

Acute Upper Non-variceal and Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common surgical emergency requiring hospital admission and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Appropriate decision-making is essential to make a prompt diagnosis, accurate risk assessment, and proper resuscitation of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Despite multiple randomized trials and meta-analyses, there is still controversy on various management issues like appropriate risk stratification, the timing of endoscopy, choosing an appropriate endoscopic, and radiological intervention in these groups of patients. As the usage of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet, and antithrombotic agents is common in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, the physician is challenged with proper management of these drugs. The present review summarizes the current strategies for risk stratification, localization of bleeding source, endoscopic and radiological intervention in patients with acute nonvariceal upper GI, middle GI, and lower GI bleeding.

A Global Definition of Patient Blood Management

While patient blood management (PBM) initiatives are increasingly adopted across the globe as part of standard of care, there is need for a clear and widely accepted definition of PBM. To address this, an expert group representing PBM organizations, from the International Foundation for Patient Blood Management (IFPBM), the Network for the Advancement of Patient Blood Management, Haemostasis and Thrombosis (NATA), the Society for the Advancement of Patient Blood Management (SABM), the Western Australia Patient Blood Management (WAPBM) Group, and OnTrac (Ontario Nurse Transfusion Coordinators) convened and developed this definition: "Patient blood management is a patient-centered, systematic, evidence-based approach to improve patient outcomes by managing and preserving a patient's own blood, while promoting patient safety and empowerment." The definition emphasizes the critical role of informed choice. PBM involves the timely, multidisciplinary application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts aimed at screening for, diagnosing and appropriately treating anemia, minimizing surgical, procedural, and iatrogenic blood losses, managing coagulopathic bleeding throughout the care and supporting the patient while appropriate treatment is initiated. We believe that having a common definition for PBM will assist all those involved including PBM organizations, hospital administrators, individual clinicians and policy makers to focus on the appropriate issues when discussing and implementing PBM. The proposed definition is expected to continue to evolve, making this endeavor a work in progress.

Emergency Blood Transfusion for Trauma and Perioperative Resuscitation: Standard of Care

Uncontrolled and massive bleeding with derangement of coagulation is a major challenge in the management of both surgical and seriously injured patients. The underlying mechanism of trauma-induced or -associated coagulopathy is tissue injury in the presence of shock and acidosis provoking endothelial damage, activation of inflammation, and coagulation disbalancing. Furthermore, the combination of ongoing blood loss and consumption of blood components that are essential for effective coagulation worsens uncontrolled hemorrhage. Additionally, therapeutic actions, such as resuscitation with replacement fluids or allogeneic blood products, can further aggravate coagulopathy. Of the coagulation factors essential to the clotting process, fibrinogen is the first to be consumed to critical levels during acute bleeding and current evidence suggests that normalizing fibrinogen levels in bleeding patients improves clot formation and clot strength, thereby controlling hemorrhage. Three different therapeutic approaches are discussed controversially. Whole blood transfusion is used especially in the military scenario and is also becoming more and more popular in the civilian world, although it is accompanied by a strong lack of evidence and severe safety issues. Transfusion of allogeneic blood concentrates in fixed ratios without any targets has been investigated extensively with disappointing results. Individualized and target-controlled coagulation management based on point-of-care diagnostics with respect to the huge heterogeneity of massive bleeding situations is an alternative and advanced approach to managing coagulopathy associated with massive bleeding in the trauma as well as the perioperative setting.

Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion

BACKGROUND

The optimal haemoglobin threshold for use of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in anaemic patients remains an active field of research. Blood is a scarce resource, and in some countries, transfusions are less safe than in others because of inadequate testing for viral pathogens. If a liberal transfusion policy does not improve clinical outcomes, or if it is equivalent, then adopting a more restrictive approach could be recognised as the standard of care.  OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review update was to compare 30-day mortality and other clinical outcomes for participants randomised to restrictive versus liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion thresholds (triggers) for all clinical conditions. The restrictive transfusion threshold uses a lower haemoglobin concentration as a threshold for transfusion (most commonly, 7.0 g/dL to 8.0 g/dL), and the liberal transfusion threshold uses a higher haemoglobin concentration as a threshold for transfusion (most commonly, 9.0 g/dL to 10.0 g/dL).

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials through updated searches: CENTRAL (2020, Issue 11), MEDLINE (1946 to November 2020), Embase (1974 to November 2020), Transfusion Evidence Library (1950 to November 2020), Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index (1990 to November 2020), and trial registries (November 2020). We  checked the reference lists of other published reviews and relevant papers to identify additional trials. We were aware of one trial identified in earlier searching that was in the process of being published (in February 2021), and we were able to include it before this review was finalised.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials of surgical or medical participants that recruited adults or children, or both. We excluded studies that focused on neonates. Eligible trials assigned intervention groups on the basis of different transfusion schedules or thresholds or 'triggers'. These thresholds would be defined by a haemoglobin (Hb) or haematocrit (Hct) concentration below which an RBC transfusion would be administered; the haemoglobin concentration remains the most commonly applied marker of the need for RBC transfusion in clinical practice. We included trials in which investigators had allocated participants to higher thresholds or more liberal transfusion strategies compared to more restrictive ones, which might include no transfusion. As in previous versions of this review, we did not exclude unregistered trials published after 2010 (as per the policy of the Cochrane Injuries Group, 2015), however, we did conduct analyses to consider the differential impact of results of trials for which prospective registration could not be confirmed.   DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified trials for inclusion and extracted data using Cochrane methods. We pooled risk ratios of clinical outcomes across trials using a random-effects model. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We conducted predefined analyses by clinical subgroups. We defined participants randomly allocated to the lower transfusion threshold as being in the 'restrictive transfusion' group and those randomly allocated to the higher transfusion threshold as being in the 'liberal transfusion' group.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 48 trials, involving data from 21,433 participants (at baseline), across a range of clinical contexts (e.g. orthopaedic, cardiac, or vascular surgery; critical care; acute blood loss (including gastrointestinal bleeding); acute coronary syndrome; cancer; leukaemia; haematological malignancies), met the eligibility criteria. The haemoglobin concentration used to define the restrictive transfusion group in most trials (36) was between 7.0 g/dL and 8.0 g/dL.  Most trials included only adults; three trials focused on children. The included studies were generally at low risk of bias for key domains including allocation concealment and incomplete outcome data. Restrictive transfusion strategies reduced the risk of receiving at least one RBC transfusion by 41% across a broad range of clinical contexts (risk ratio (RR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.66; 42 studies, 20,057 participants; high-quality evidence), with a large amount of heterogeneity between trials (I² = 96%). Overall, restrictive transfusion strategies did not increase or decrease the risk of 30-day mortality compared with liberal transfusion strategies (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15; 31 studies, 16,729 participants; I² = 30%; moderate-quality evidence) or any of the other outcomes assessed (i.e. cardiac events (low-quality evidence), myocardial infarction, stroke, thromboembolism (all high-quality evidence)). High-quality evidence shows that the liberal transfusion threshold did not affect the risk of infection (pneumonia, wound infection, or bacteraemia). Transfusion-specific reactions are uncommon and were inconsistently reported within trials. We noted less certainty in the strength of evidence to support the safety of restrictive transfusion thresholds for the following predefined clinical subgroups: myocardial infarction, vascular surgery, haematological malignancies, and chronic bone-marrow disorders.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Transfusion at a restrictive haemoglobin concentration decreased the proportion of people exposed to RBC transfusion by 41% across a broad range of clinical contexts. Across all trials, no evidence suggests that a restrictive transfusion strategy impacted 30-day mortality, mortality at other time points, or morbidity (i.e. cardiac events, myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, thromboembolism, infection) compared with a liberal transfusion strategy. Despite including 17 more randomised trials (and 8846 participants), data remain insufficient to inform the safety of transfusion policies in important and selected clinical contexts, such as myocardial infarction, chronic cardiovascular disease, neurological injury or traumatic brain injury, stroke, thrombocytopenia, and cancer or haematological malignancies, including chronic bone marrow failure.  Further work is needed to improve our understanding of outcomes other than mortality. Most trials compared only two separate thresholds for haemoglobin concentration, which may not identify the actual optimal threshold for transfusion in a particular patient. Haemoglobin concentration may not be the most informative marker of the need for transfusion in individual patients with different degrees of physiological adaptation to anaemia. Notwithstanding these issues, overall findings provide good evidence that transfusions with allogeneic RBCs can be avoided in most patients with haemoglobin thresholds between the range of 7.0 g/dL and 8.0 g/dL. Some patient subgroups might benefit from RBCs to maintain higher haemoglobin concentrations; research efforts should focus on these clinical contexts.

How Would You Manage This Patient With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding? : Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is common, morbid, and potentially fatal. Cornerstones of inpatient management include fluid resuscitation; blood transfusion; endoscopy; and initiation of proton-pump inhibitor therapy, which continues in an individualized manner based on risk factors for recurrent bleeding in the outpatient setting. The International Consensus Group released guidelines on the management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 2019. These guidelines provide a helpful, evidence-based roadmap for management of gastrointestinal bleeding but leave certain management details to the discretion of the treating physician. Here, 2 gastroenterologists consider the care of a patient with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a peptic ulcer, specifically debating approaches to blood transfusion and endoscopy timing in the hospital, as well as the recommended duration of proton-pump inhibitor therapy after discharge.

Erstellung zuverlässiger Erythrozytenkonzentrat-Bedarfslisten für Operationen und Interventionen aus Data-Warehouse-Daten und der patientenbezogenen Chargendokumentation von Blutkomponenten

Das Versäumnis, transfusionsvorbereitende Diagnostik durchzuführen und eine ausreichende Anzahl von Blutkomponenten vor der Operation zu bestellen, führt zunehmend zu klinischen Notfällen und vermeidbaren Risiken für die Patienten. Die eigentlich obligatorische Erstellung von Blutbedarfslisten scheitert oft an der Verfügbarkeit geeigneter Daten. Das Universitätsklinikum Erlangen ist ein Krankenhaus der Tertiärversorgung mit 1400 Betten. Hier werden seit 2010 kontinuierlich alle relevanten Daten zur Interpretation von Mustern bei der Verwendung von Blutbestandteilen erhoben. Wir sind in der Lage, die klinischen Data-Warehouse-Komponenten der persönlichen Daten der Empfänger von Erythrozytenkonzentraten (EK), die Codes der stationären Patienten im G-DRG-System (G-DRG: German Diagnosis Related Group), ICD-Codes, OPS-Codes und die Daten der EK-Komponenten aus dem IT-System der Blutbank zu integrieren. Die erhaltenen DRGs, ICD-Codes und OPS-Codes werden mit den Daten des Blutkomponentenverbrauchs auf individueller Basis verknüpft. Analysen können sowohl im gesamten Krankenhaus als auch in Bezug auf bestimmte Abteilungen durchgeführt werden. Die laufende Verfeinerung der Datenbankabfragen verbessert die Fähigkeit, den Blutbedarf für Standardoperationen und Interventionen korrekt abzuschätzen. Die Ergebnisse weichen zum Teil erheblich von den Schätzungen der Operateure hinsichtlich der Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Transfusion ab, oftmals wird die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Transfusion unterschätzt. Die korrekte Einhaltung der 10-prozentigen Transfusionswahrscheinlichkeitsgrenze für die Frage der frühen präoperativen Bereitstellung von Kreuzblut kann durch solche Abfragen verbessert werden. Dem Phänomen der „verzögerten Transfusion“ entgegenzuwirken, wird zu einer immer wichtigeren Aufgabe für den klinisch tätigen transfusionsmedizinischen Arzt. Die Erstellung von Statistiken über die Transfusionswahrscheinlichkeit durch die Verknüpfung von Data-Warehouse-Daten und Chargendokumentationsdaten aus Blutbanken kann die notwendigen Werkzeuge bereitstellen.

Role of preoperative intravenous iron therapy to correct anemia before major surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative anemia is a common comorbidity that often necessitates allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). As there is a risk associated with blood transfusions, preoperative intravenous iron (IV) has been proposed to increase the hemoglobin to reduce perioperative transfusion; however, randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating this efficacy for IV iron are small, limited, and inconclusive. Consequently, a meta-analysis that pools these studies may provide new and clinically useful information.

METHODS/DESIGN

Databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews; Cochrane-controlled trial registry; Scopus; registries of health technology assessment and clinical trials; Web of Science; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses; Clinicaltrials.gov; and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) were searched. Also, we screened all the retrieved reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance (i.e., relevant, irrelevant, or potentially relevant). Then, we screened full texts of those citations identified as potentially applicable.

RESULTS

Our search found 3195 citations and ten RCTs (1039 participants) that met our inclusion criteria. Preoperative IV iron supplementation significantly decreases ABT by 16% (risk ratio (RR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71, 0.99, p = 0.04). In addition, preoperatively, hemoglobin levels increased after receiving IV iron (mean difference [MD] between the study groups: 7.15 g/L, 95% CI: 2.26, 12.04 g/L, p = 0.004) and at follow-up >  4 weeks postoperatively (MD: 6.46 g/L, 95% CI: 3.10, 9.81, p = 0.0002). Iron injection was not associated with increased incidence of non-serious or serious adverse effects across groups (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.65, p = 0.52) and (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.44, 2.10, p = 0.92) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

With moderate certainty, due to the high risk of bias in some studies in one or two domains, we found intravenous iron supplementation is associated with a significant decrease in the blood transfusions rate, and modest hemoglobin concentrations rise when injected pre-surgery compared with placebo or oral iron supplementation. However, further full-scale randomized controlled trials with robust methodology are required. In particular, the safety, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of different intravenous iron preparations require further evaluation.

RBC Transfusion Triggers: Is There Anything New?

For many years, in daily clinical practice, the traditional 10/30 rule (hemoglobin 10 g/dL - hematocrit 30%) has been the most commonly used trigger for blood transfusions. Over the years, this approach is believed to have contributed to a countless number of unnecessary transfusions and an unknown number of overtransfusion-related deaths. Recent studies have shown that lower hemoglobin levels can safely be accepted, even in critically ill patients. However, even these new transfusion thresholds are far beyond the theoretical limits of individual anemia tolerance. For this reason, almost all publications addressing the limits of acute anemia recommend physiological transfusion triggers to indicate the transfusion of erythrocyte concentrates as an alternative. Although this concept appears intuitive at first glance, no solid scientific evidence supports the safety and benefit of physiological transfusion triggers to indicate the optimal time point for transfusion of allogeneic blood. It is therefore imperative to continue searching for the most sensitive and specific parameters that can guide the clinician when to transfuse in order to avoid anemia-induced organ dysfunction while avoiding overtransfusion-related adverse effects. This narrative review discusses the concept of anemia tolerance and critically compares hemoglobin-based triggers with physiological transfusion for various clinical indications.