1
|
Wu X, Novakovic VA, Shi J. Connective tissue disorders in COVID-19: Reply to "People with a connective tissue disorder may be especially vulnerable to the endothelial damage that characterizes long COVID due to the fragility of their vasculature and slow wound healing". Angiogenesis 2024; 27:125-127. [PMID: 38532037 DOI: 10.1007/s10456-024-09915-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Connective tissue serves as a framework for other tissues and organs, supporting their functions, shielding them from harmful factors, and aiding repair. In COVID-19, damaged endothelial cells (ECs), increased endothelial permeability, and thrombi contribute to the connective tissue disorders. Even post-recovery, the damage to ECs and connective tissues persists, resulting in long COVID. Individuals with connective tissue disorders are prone to developing severe COVID-19 and experiencing long COVID symptoms. It is advised that these patients receive at least three vaccine doses, undergo early prophylactic antithrombotic therapy during acute COVID-19, and maintain prophylactic anticoagulant treatment in cases of long COVID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoming Wu
- Department of Hematology, The First Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China
- The Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education Harbin, Harbin, China
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Valerie A Novakovic
- Department of Research, Harvard Medical School, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jialan Shi
- Department of Hematology, The First Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China.
- Department of Research, Harvard Medical School, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hanberg JS, Fu X, Wang X, Patel NJ, Kawano Y, Schiff A, Kowalski EN, Cook CE, Vanni KMM, Guzzo K, Qian G, Bade KJ, Saavedra A, Venkat R, Srivatsan S, Zhang Y, Sparks JA, Wallace ZS. Effectiveness of a fourth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: an emulated target trial. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2024; 6:e21-e30. [PMID: 38258675 PMCID: PMC10806341 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00272-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) might have blunted responses to COVID-19 vaccines. The initial mRNA vaccine series is defined as three doses for this population and a fourth booster dose is recommended. The effectiveness of the fourth dose in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using DMARDs is not well established. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of receiving versus not receiving a fourth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine using a target trial framework, in a cohort of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases receiving DMARD therapy. METHODS We conducted an emulated target trial using observational data from the Mass General Brigham health-care system to compare receiving versus not receiving a fourth mRNA vaccine dose. Analysed patients had systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, were prescribed DMARDs, and were eligible for a fourth dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines between Jan 16 and June 11, 2022. To account for temporal changes, the study period was divided into 1-week intervals. Fourth-dose-exposed patients were included in a 1-week interval if they received a fourth mRNA dose in that interval; fourth-dose-unexposed patients were eligible for but had not received the fourth dose of the vaccine. The primary outcome was a SARS-CoV-2 infection; the secondary outcome was severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (ie, admission to hospital or death within -3 to +14 days of a positive test). We assessed the effectiveness of the fourth dose using time-stratified, overlap propensity score-weighted Cox regression models. FINDINGS We included 4305 patients, 3126 of whom received a fourth dose of vaccine and 1179 who had not. The median follow-up time was 135 days (IQR 112-154) among patients who had received a fourth dose and 65 days (30-156) among patients who had not received a fourth dose. After overlap weighting in both groups, 1863 (72·7%) of 2563 participants were women, 700 (27·3%) were men, and 2242 (87·5%) were White. Rheumatoid arthritis was present in 1392 (54·3%) of 2563 participants; the most frequent treatments were conventional synthetic DMARDs (1489 [58·1%]) or biological DMARDs (1007 [39·3%]). SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was lower among patients receiving versus not receiving a fourth dose of vaccine (HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·47-0·74]). A fourth dose reduced the risk of admission to hospital or death within -3 to +14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection (0·35 [0·14-0·85]). INTERPRETATION In this emulated target trial, a fourth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using DMARDs during the Omicron era. Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases should be encouraged to remain up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccinations. FUNDING The National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Hanberg
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xiaoqing Fu
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Rheumatology and Allergy Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xiaosong Wang
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Naomi J Patel
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yumeko Kawano
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Abigail Schiff
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily N Kowalski
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claire E Cook
- Rheumatology and Allergy Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathleen M M Vanni
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Krishan Guzzo
- Rheumatology and Allergy Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Grace Qian
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katarina J Bade
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alene Saavedra
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rathnam Venkat
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shruthi Srivatsan
- Rheumatology and Allergy Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yuqing Zhang
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Rheumatology and Allergy Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Sparks
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zachary S Wallace
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Rheumatology and Allergy Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Serra López-Matencio JM, Vicente-Rabaneda EF, Alañón E, Aranguren Oyarzabal A, Martínez Fleta P, Castañeda S. COVID-19 Vaccination and Immunosuppressive Therapy in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1813. [PMID: 38140217 PMCID: PMC10747214 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 vaccination program has probably been the most complex and extensive project in history until now, which has been a challenge for all the people involved in the planning and management of this program. Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on immunosuppressive therapy have required special attention, not only because of the particular haste in carrying out the process but also because of the uncertainty regarding their response to the vaccines. We now have strong scientific evidence that supports the hypothesis that immunosuppressive therapy inhibits the humoral response to vaccines against other infectious agents, such as influenza, pneumococcus and hepatitis B. This has led to the hypothesis that the same could happen with the COVID-19 vaccine. Several studies have therefore already been carried out in this area, suggesting that temporarily discontinuing the administration of methotrexate for 2 weeks post-vaccination could improve the vaccine response, and other studies with various immunosuppressive drugs are in the same line. However, the fact of withholding or interrupting immunosuppressive therapy when dealing with COVID-19 vaccination remains unclear. On this basis, our article tries to compile the information available on the effect of immunosuppressant agents on COVID-19 vaccine responses in patients with IMIDs and proposes an algorithm for the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M. Serra López-Matencio
- Hospital Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.A.); (A.A.O.)
| | | | - Estefanía Alañón
- Hospital Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.A.); (A.A.O.)
| | - Ainhoa Aranguren Oyarzabal
- Hospital Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.A.); (A.A.O.)
| | - Pedro Martínez Fleta
- Immunology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Santos Castañeda
- Rheumatology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|