1
|
Mercuri M, Hackett K, Barnabas RV, Emerson CI. Evaluation of a single-dose HPV vaccine strategy for promoting vaccine, health, and gender equity. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2024:S1473-3099(24)00227-5. [PMID: 38734009 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00227-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Although several countries have adopted a single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination strategy, many other countries continue to include multiple doses in their vaccination programmes. There are ethical reasons to transition to a single-dose strategy. We discuss how a single-dose HPV vaccination strategy advances equity in three dimensions: vaccine equity, health equity, and gender equity. Adopting a single-dose strategy eases pressure on vaccine supply, lowers programme costs, and is easier to distribute. This change facilitates vaccine procurement and implementation programmes (contributing to vaccine equity) and reaching hard to reach people or populations (contributing to health equity). A lower number of cases of HPV-related diseases that stem from greater vaccine distribution reduces the burden on women, who are at a higher risk of HPV-related disease or who act as caregivers, which prevents them from accessing opportunities that contribute to their empowerment (contributing to gender equity). Thus, pursuing the single-dose HPV vaccination programme strategy is ethically desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Mercuri
- Institute on Ethics & Policy for Innovation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Philosophy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Centre for Philosophy of Epidemiology, Medicine, and Public Health, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa
| | - Kristy Hackett
- Institute on Ethics & Policy for Innovation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Philosophy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Epidemiology Division, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ruanne V Barnabas
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudia I Emerson
- Institute on Ethics & Policy for Innovation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Philosophy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jit M, Cook AR. Informing Public Health Policies with Models for Disease Burden, Impact Evaluation, and Economic Evaluation. Annu Rev Public Health 2024; 45:133-150. [PMID: 37871140 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060222-025149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Conducting real-world public health experiments is often costly, time-consuming, and ethically challenging, so mathematical models have a long-standing history of being used to inform policy. Applications include estimating disease burden, performing economic evaluation of interventions, and responding to health emergencies such as pandemics. Models played a pivotal role during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing early detection of SARS-CoV-2's pandemic potential and informing subsequent public health measures. While models offer valuable policy insights, they often carry limitations, especially when they depend on assumptions and incomplete data. Striking a balance between accuracy and timely decision-making in rapidly evolving situations such as disease outbreaks is challenging. Modelers need to explore the extent to which their models deviate from representing the real world. The uncertainties inherent in models must be effectively communicated to policy makers and the public. As the field becomes increasingly influential, it needs to develop reporting standards that enable rigorous external scrutiny.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Jit
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom;
| | - Alex R Cook
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Song Y, Choi W, Shim E. Cost-Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the UK: Two Versus Single-Dose of Nonavalent HPV Vaccination. Am J Prev Med 2024:S0749-3797(24)00102-8. [PMID: 38508425 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The UK implemented a single-dose HPV vaccination policy in September 2023, aiming for sustained protection, better vaccine coverage, and reduced healthcare costs. This research assesses the cost-effectiveness of both one-dose and two-dose schedules from a healthcare perspective. METHODS Using an age-structured dynamic model, the study analyzed long-term health and economic outcomes of these two different vaccination approaches. It focused on the effects of vaccinating 12- to 13-year-olds with the 9-valent HPV vaccine in either single-dose or two-dose regimens from 2023 to 2093. The analysis, conducted in 2023-2024, explored different immunity durations (10, 30 years, or lifetime) and efficacy levels for the single-dose strategy. RESULTS The study indicated that in the UK, vaccinating 12- to 13-year-olds with a two-dose regimen is not considered cost-effective compared to the single-dose option, assumed to be 90% as effective for 10 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for two doses ranged from £230,903 to £1,082,916 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), significantly exceeding the UK's £20,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. Over 70 years, a switch from a two-dose to a single-dose vaccination schedule could potentially lead to savings of over £1,073 million in the healthcare system. Furthermore, the single-dose regimen was cost-effective compared to no vaccination, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below £2,040/QALY. CONCLUSIONS The study affirms the cost-effectiveness of the UK's single-dose HPV vaccine, in sync with its September 2023 policy shift. The shift not only provides financial benefits but also simplifies vaccine administration, strategically reducing HPV's epidemiological and economic impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngji Song
- Department of Mathematics, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Wongyeong Choi
- Department of Mathematics, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunha Shim
- Department of Mathematics, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang Y, Zhang D, Yin L, Zhao J, Li Z, Lu J, Zhang X, Wu C, Wu W. Modeling the Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of a Combined Schoolgirl HPV Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Guangdong Province, China. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 11:103. [PMID: 38255416 PMCID: PMC10814869 DOI: 10.3390/children11010103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Low human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake is a key barrier to cervical cancer elimination. We aimed to evaluate the health impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing different HPV vaccines into immunization programs and scaling up the screening program in Guangdong. We used a dynamic compartmental model to estimate the impact of intervention strategies during 2023-2100. We implemented the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in costs per averted disability-adjusted life year (DALY) as an indicator to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. We used an age-standardized incidence of 4 cases per 100,000 women as the threshold for the elimination of cervical cancer. Compared with the status quo, scaling up cervical cancer screening coverage alone would prevent 215,000 (95% CI: 205,000 to 227,000) cervical cancer cases and 49,000 (95% CI: 48,000 to 52,000) deaths during 2023-2100. If the coverage of vaccination reached 90%, domestic two-dose 2vHPV vaccination would be more cost-effective than single-dose and two-dose 9vHPV vaccination. If Guangdong introduced domestic two-dose 2vHPV vaccination at 90% coverage for schoolgirls from 2023 and increased the screening coverage, cervical cancer would be eliminated by 2049 (95% CI 2047 to 2051). Introducing two doses of domestic 2vHPV vaccination for schoolgirls and expanding cervical cancer screening is estimated to be highly cost-effective to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer in Guangdong.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yating Huang
- School of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510200, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China
| | - Dantao Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China
| | - Lihua Yin
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China
| | - Jianguo Zhao
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China
| | - Zhifeng Li
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China
| | - Jing Lu
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China
| | - Xiaoming Zhang
- The Second Division Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Tiemenguan 841007, China
| | - Chenggang Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China
| | - Wei Wu
- School of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510200, China
- Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barnabas RV, Brown ER, Onono MA, Bukusi EA, Njoroge B, Winer RL, Galloway DA, Pinder LF, Donnell D, N Wakhungu I, Biwott C, Kimanthi S, Heller KB, Kanjilal DG, Pacella D, Morrison S, A Rechkina E, L Cherne S, Schaafsma TT, McClelland RS, Celum C, Baeten JM, Mugo NR. Durability of single-dose HPV vaccination in young Kenyan women: randomized controlled trial 3-year results. Nat Med 2023; 29:3224-3232. [PMID: 38049621 PMCID: PMC10719107 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02658-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
Cervical cancer burden is high where prophylactic vaccination and screening coverage are low. We demonstrated in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled trial that single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination had high vaccine efficacy (VE) against persistent infection at 18 months in Kenyan women. Here, we report findings of this trial through 3 years of follow-up. Overall, 2,275 healthy women aged 15-20 years were recruited and randomly assigned to receive bivalent (n = 760), nonavalent (n = 758) or control (n = 757) vaccine. The primary outcome was incident-persistent vaccine type-specific cervical HPV infection. The primary evaluation was superiority analysis in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) HPV 16/18 and HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 cohorts. The trial met its prespecified end points of vaccine type-specific persistent HPV infection. A total of 75 incident-persistent infections were detected in the HPV 16/18 mITT cohort: 2 in the bivalent group, 1 in the nonavalent group and 72 in the control group. Nonavalent VE was 98.8% (95% CI 91.3-99.8%, P < 0.0001) and bivalent VE was 97.5% (95% CI 90.0-99.4%, P < 0.0001). Overall, 89 persistent infections were detected in the HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 mITT cohort: 5 in the nonavalent group and 84 in the control group; nonavalent VE was 95.5% (95% CI 89.0-98.2%, P < 0.0001). There were no vaccine-related severe adverse events. Three years after vaccination, single-dose HPV vaccination was highly efficacious, safe and conferred durable protection. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03675256 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruanne V Barnabas
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, T. H. Chan Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Elizabeth R Brown
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Maricianah A Onono
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Elizabeth A Bukusi
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Betty Njoroge
- Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Rachel L Winer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Denise A Galloway
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Leeya F Pinder
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Deborah Donnell
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Imelda N Wakhungu
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Charlene Biwott
- Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Syovata Kimanthi
- Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kate B Heller
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Diane G Kanjilal
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Pacella
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Morrison
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elena A Rechkina
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stephen L Cherne
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Torin T Schaafsma
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - R Scott McClelland
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- East Africa STI Laboratory, University of Washington, Mombasa, Kenya
| | - Connie Celum
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jared M Baeten
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nelly R Mugo
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|