Intravenous versus subcutaneous delivery of biotherapeutics in IBD: an expert's and patient's perspective

Patient and Physician Perspectives of Treatment Burden in Multiple Sclerosis

The number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has greatly increased in recent decades, leading to higher treatment complexity. DMTs can differ in mode and frequency of administration, benefit-risk profile, and associated costs. Patients with MS contend not only with the burden of their chronic disease but also with the treatment burden of their MS therapy. Adhering to dosing schedules and infusion appointments can be difficult for busy, working-age patients or those with limited access to transportation. Patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) may have differing priorities, concerns, and preferences when selecting treatment, potentially affecting treatment satisfaction and, importantly, adherence. Additionally, patients face direct and indirect costs related to treatment. These factors can all contribute to a high treatment burden on patients, impacting their quality of life and potentially leading to worse patient outcomes. HCPs, patients, and caregivers must work together to alleviate treatment burden through effective communication, shared decision-making, appreciating each other's perspectives, and additional HCP support. Consideration of treatment burden into clinical guidelines is also warranted. In this review, we examine key factors impacting treatment burden for patients with MS, with a focus on the patient perspective as provided by our patient authors, and provide strategies to minimize treatment burden.

Ecogastroenterology: cultivating sustainable clinical excellence in an environmentally conscious landscape

Gastrointestinal practices, especially endoscopy, have a substantial environmental impact, marked by notable greenhouse gas emissions and waste generation. As the world struggles with climate change, there emerges a pressing need to re-evaluate and reform the environmental footprint within gastrointestinal medicine. The challenge lies in finding a harmonious balance between ensuring clinical effectiveness and upholding environmental responsibility. This task involves recognising that the most significant reduction in the carbon footprint of endoscopy is achieved by avoiding unnecessary procedures; addressing the use of single-use endoscopes and accessories; and extending beyond the procedural suites to include clinics, virtual care, and conferences, among other aspects of gastrointestinal practice. The emerging digital realm in health care is crucial, given the potential environmental advantages of virtual gastroenterological care. Through an in-depth analysis, this review presents a path towards sustainable gastrointestinal practices, emphasising integrated strategies that prioritise both patient care and environmental stewardship.

Switching from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Biological Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Remains a Challenge

Biological inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) medications, once limited to intravenous (IV) administration, can now be administered both via IV and subcutaneously (SC). This study investigates patient preferences, willingness to switch from IV to SC, and associated factors. A questionnaire covering demographics, disease-related inquiries, quality of life, and IBD medication preferences was distributed via email, the Israeli Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Foundation, infusion centers, and clinics. From 454 IBD patients (median age: 42 years; 55.7% female), responses revealed a preference for SC every 8 weeks, which is comparable to daily oral dosing. Both options were significantly favored over IV every 8 weeks and SC every 2 weeks, with no statistically significant differences between the latter two. However, among patients who were experienced with both SC and IV administration, a clear preference for SC administration every 2 weeks over IV every 8 weeks surfaced. Among IV-treated patients, 54.5% resisted switching to SC. Key reasons for this included medical staff presence (57.7%), a fear of needles (46.4%), belief in infusion efficacy (37.1%), and longer intervals between infusions (36.1%). Findings suggest that transitioning from IV to SC treatment is challenging due to patient resistance, which is influenced by specific factors. Identifying and addressing these obstacles is crucial for optimizing IBD management.

Remission Is Maintained after Switch from Dose-Optimised Intravenous Treatment to Subcutaneous Treatment with Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background and Objectives: The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of vedolizumab has proven to be effective for the maintenance of remission after intravenous induction. Little is known about the efficacy of switching from intravenous maintenance treatment to SC. We aimed to assess the real-world efficacy of switching to SC treatment and to assess the impact of a baseline treatment regimen. Materials and Methods: In this observational cohort study, adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease who were switched to SC vedolizumab maintenance treatment were enrolled. Patients after intravenous induction and patients who switched from intravenous maintenance treatment (every 8 weeks or every 4 weeks) were included. The SC vedolizumab dosing was 108 mg every 2 weeks, regardless of the previous regimen. The clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic disease activity parameters and vedolizumab serum concentrations at the time of the switch and at the follow-up were assessed. Results: In total, 135 patients (38% Crohn's disease, 62% ulcerative colitis) were switched to SC vedolizumab treatment. The median time to the first follow-up (FU) was 14.5 weeks (IQR 12-26), and the median time to the second FU was 40 weeks (IQR 36-52). Nine patients (7%) discontinued SC vedolizumab treatment, with two-thirds of them discontinuing due to active disease. In all dosing regimens, there were no significant changes in the clinical scores and CRP at the baseline and first and second FUs. Clinical and biochemical remission appeared to be maintained irrespective of the previous dosing regimen. Conclusions: The results of this real-world study suggest that the maintenance of clinical and biomarker remission can be achieved in patients who switched from intravenous to SC vedolizumab. The baseline vedolizumab dosing regimen (every 4 weeks versus every 8 weeks) did not have an impact on outcomes.

Telemedicine in inflammatory bowel disease from its origin to the post pandemic golden age: A narrative review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a chronic intestinal inflammatory disorder encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease can be disabling and often requires lifelong treatment and follow-up. Digital health technologies and distance-management tools are less costly alternatives for IBD management and clinical monitoring. This review discusses how telephone/videoconference appointments enable treatment optimization from an early disease stage, provide complementary value-based patient care and educational resources, and allow consistent follow-up with a high standard of care. Replacing/supplementing traditional clinical consultations with telemedicine reduces healthcare utilization costs and the need for in-person consultations. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the evolution of telemedicine in IBD, with several studies conducted since 2020 reporting high levels of patient satisfaction. Home-based injectable formulations coupled with telemedicine may become permanently embedded in healthcare systems in the post-pandemic period. While telemedicine consultations are well-accepted by many patients with IBD, they do not suit all patients or are not preferred (e.g., by elderly who do not have the means or ability to understand the associated technology). Ultimately, use of telemedicine should be decided by the patient and careful consideration is required to ensure that the patient is willing and capable of a successful remote visit.

Reversible protein complexes as a promising avenue for the development of high concentration formulations of biologics

High concentration formulations have become an important pre-requisite in the development of biological drugs, particularly in the case of subcutaneous administration where limited injection volume negatively affects the administered dose. In this study, we propose to develop high concentration formulations of biologics using a reversible protein-polyelectrolyte complex (RPC) approach. First, the versatility of RPC was assessed using different complexing agents and formats of therapeutic proteins, to define the optimal conditions for complexation and dissociation of the complex. The stability of the protein was investigated before and after complexation, as well as upon a 4-week storage period at various temperatures. Subsequently, two approaches were selected to develop high concentration RPC formulations: first, using up-concentrated RPC suspensions in aqueous buffers, and second, by generating spray-dried RPC and further resuspension in non-aqueous solvents. Results showed that the RPC concept is applicable to a wide range of therapeutic protein formats and the complexation-dissociation process did not affect the stability of the proteins. High concentration formulations up to 200 mg/mL could be achieved by up-concentrating RPC suspensions in aqueous buffers and RPC suspensions in non-aqueous solvents were concentrated up to 250 mg/mL. Although optimization is needed, our data suggests that RPC may be a promising avenue to achieve high concentration formulations of biologics for subcutaneous administration.

Considerations for the development of a field-based medical device for the administration of adjunctive therapies for snakebite envenoming

The timely administration of antivenom is the most effective method currently available to reduce the burden of snakebite envenoming (SBE), a neglected tropical disease that most often affects rural agricultural global populations. There is increasing interest in the development of adjunctive small molecule and biologic therapeutics that target the most problematic venom components to bridge the time-gap between initial SBE and the administration antivenom. Unique combinations of these therapeutics could provide relief from the toxic effects of regional groupings of medically relevant snake species. The application a PRISMA/PICO literature search methodology demonstrated an increasing interest in the rapid administration of therapies to improve patient symptoms and outcomes after SBE. Advice from expert interviews and considerations regarding the potential routes of therapy administration, anatomical bite location, and species-specific venom delivery have provided a framework to identify ideal metrics and potential hurdles for the development of a field-based medical device that could be used immediately after SBE to deliver adjunctive therapies. The use of subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) injection were identified as potential routes of administration of both small molecule and biologic therapies. The development of a field-based medical device for the delivery of adjunctive SBE therapies presents unique challenges that will require a collaborative and transdisciplinary approach to be successful.

Healthcare Provider Administration of Biologics for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis: Literature Review and Clinical Considerations

Objective

Plaque psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated skin disease. Biologic therapies markedly improve skin disease severity and health-related quality of life for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. All but two of the biologics approved in the United States for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis may be self-administered by adult patients via subcutaneous injection. This review discusses rationales for choosing healthcare provider (HCP) administration over self-administration of biologics for patients with plaque psoriasis, including treatment adherence, patient preference, and practical considerations.

Methods

PubMed was searched for "psoriasisAND biologic AND administration AND (office OR provider OR profession)." The most relevant results and additional papers identified from the references were included in the review.

Results

Although many patients prefer self-administration, others may benefit from HCP administration. Key considerations in the choice between HCP vs. self-administration of biologics for plaque psoriasis treatment include adherence, patient preferences, and practical concerns. Patient characteristics that may make HCP administration of biologic therapies for treatment of plaque psoriasis preferable to at-home self-administration are discussed.

Limitations

There are few published studies specific to HCP administration of biologics for treatment of psoriasis.

Conclusion

Administration of biologics by an HCP may improve treatment adherence and clinical outcomes compared to self-administration in selected patients with plaque psoriasis.

Subcutaneous versus intravenous tramadol for extremity injury with moderate pain in the emergency department: a randomised controlled noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Musculoskeletal trauma is a common presentation in the emergency department (ED). Tramadol as an analgesic has been recommended by pain management guidelines for musculoskeletal pain. Parenteral tramadol in the ED is commonly administered intravenously. Subcutaneously administered tramadol may have other advantages such as easier and faster preparation, avoids the need for intravenous (i.v.) access, and reduces the incidence of respiratory and gastrointestinal effects. However, studies comparing subcutaneous (s.c.) and i.v. tramadol for the management of acute moderate pain in patients with extremity injury are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of s.c. tramadol vs. i.v. tramadol in patients with moderate pain due to extremity injury in the ED.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial included adult patients presented to an academic, tertiary hospital ED with moderate pain (pain score of 4-6 on the visual analog scale) due to extremity injury. Intervention patients stratified to pain score were randomized to receive 50 mg of i.v. or s.c. tramadol.

OUTCOMES MEASURE AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcome measure was the difference in the pain score reduction at 30 min after tramadol administration between the two groups. The noninferiority null hypothesis was that the therapeutic difference in terms of pain score reduction of more than 0.8 exists between the two treatment groups at the endpoint.

MAIN RESULTS

In total 232 patients were randomized to i.v. ( n  = 115) or s.c. ( n  = 117). Although 225 were analyzed in the per-protocol population (i.v. = 113; s.c. = 112). The baseline median pain score was 6 (IQR, 5-6). Median pain score reduction at 30 min after administration was 2 (IQR, 1-3) in the IV group vs. 2 (IQR, 1-2) in the s.c. group with a median difference of 0 (IQR, 0-0), which was below the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.8. Adverse events in the i.v. group were higher compared to the s.c. group (33.6% vs. 8.9%, P  ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The s.c. tramadol is noninferior to i.v. tramadol in the treatment of moderate pain from extremity injuries.

Safety and efficacy of transitioning inflammatory bowel disease patients from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab: a single-center real-world experience

Background

A new subcutaneous (SC) formulation exists for infliximab (CT-P13 SC). The aim of this study was to assess the durability of clinical and endoscopic responses after a switch from intravenous (IV) to SC infliximab.

Methods

Patients were transitioned on maintenance infliximab, including those with dose-optimized therapy. The primary outcome was clinical, biochemical and overall remission at 6 months, as defined by a Harvey-Bradshaw Index <5 for Crohn's disease or a partial Mayo score <3 for ulcerative colitis, C-reactive protein less than 10 mg/L, and fecal calprotectin less than 100 μg/g.

Results

Forty patients were switched from IV to SC infliximab. Twenty-seven (68%) had a diagnosis of Crohn's disease and 13 (33%) had ulcerative colitis. Twenty-three (58%) were on 5 mg/kg of IV infliximab every 8 weeks and 15 (38%) 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks. There were 2 patients (4%) on 10 mg/kg every 6 weeks. At the time of their switch, 37 (93%) patients were in clinical remission, 25 (76%) were in biochemical remission, and 25 (76%) were in both biochemical and clinical remission. At 6 months the proportion of patients in clinical remission decreased from 93% to 82%, with an overall relapse rate of 11%. Treatment persistence at 6 months was 77.5%.

Conclusion

Switching patients from IV infliximab to 120 mg fortnightly SC injections is a safe and effective option for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, including for those patients on dose-escalated infliximab or with active disease at the time of switch.

Choosing the Right Therapy at the Right Time for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Does Sequence Matter

Despite the enlarging therapeutic armamentarium, IBD is still plagued by a therapeutic ceiling. Precision medicine, with the selection of the "rights," may present a solution, and this review will discuss the critical process of pairing the right patient with right therapy at the right time. Firstly, the review will discuss the shift to and evidence behind early effective therapy. Then, it delves into promising future strategies of patient profiling to identify a patients' biological pathway(s) and prognosis. Finally, the review lays out practical considerations that drive treatment selection, particularly the impact of the therapeutic sequence.

Effectiveness of Switching to Subcutaneous Infliximab in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients on Intravenous Maintenance Therapy

No real-world data are available on subcutaneous infliximab (SC-IFX) in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD). We report a single-center cohort experience of an elective switching program from biosimilar intravenous infliximab to SC-IFX, 120 mg fortnightly, as maintenance. Clinical and laboratory data were collected for 7 patients with infliximab trough levels collected prior and at 6 and 40 weeks after the switch. High treatment persistence was registered with a single patient discontinuing the treatment due to high IFX antibodies, already present before switching. All patients remained in clinical remission with no significant changes in laboratory markers and median infliximab trough levels (12.3 µg/mL at baseline; 13.9 and 14.0 µg/mL at 6 and 40 weeks respectively). No newly-developed IFX antibodies were detected and no adverse reactions or rescue therapies were recorded. Our real-world data support the feasibility of an elective switch to SC-IFX in PIBD as maintenance with potential advantages concerning medical resources and patient satisfaction.

Fibronectin-targeted FUD and PEGylated FUD peptides for fibrotic diseases

Tissue fibrosis is characterized by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules. Fibronectin (FN) is a glycoprotein found in the blood and tissues, a key player in the assembly of ECM through interaction with cellular and extracellular components. Functional Upstream Domain (FUD), a peptide derived from an adhesin protein of bacteria, has a high binding affinity for the N-terminal 70-kDa domain of FN that plays a crucial role in FN polymerization. In this regard, FUD peptide has been characterized as a potent inhibitor of FN matrix assembly, reducing excessive ECM accumulation. Furthermore, PEGylated FUD was developed to prevent rapid elimination of FUD and enhance its systemic exposure in vivo. Herein, we summarize the development of FUD peptide as a potential anti-fibrotic agent and its application in experimental fibrotic diseases. In addition, we discuss how modification of the FUD peptide via PEGylation impacts pharmacokinetic profiles of the FUD peptide and can potentially contribute to anti-fibrosis therapy.

Real-world experience with subcutaneous infliximab: broadening treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

The first subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab (IFX), CT‑P13 SC, has been approved in Europe and Australia, including for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive overview of available clinical trial and real-world data for IFX SC treatment of IBD, focusing on the potential benefits of switching from IFX intravenous (IV) to IFX SC. We evaluate emerging evidence for IFX SC treatment for difficult-to-treat IBD, use as monotherapy, and suitability for patients receiving escalated IFX IV doses. Therapeutic drug monitoring approaches and patient and healthcare system perspectives on IFX SC are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

IFX SC represents a significant treatment innovation in the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor class after approximately 20 years of IFX IV availability. Evidence suggests that IFX SC is well tolerated and is associated with high patient acceptance and satisfaction. In addition, effectiveness is maintained in patients with stable disease following switch from IFX IV. Switching may be advisable, given the clinical benefits of IFX SC and its potential to improve healthcare service capacity. There are several areas requiring further research, including the role of IFX SC in difficult-to-treat and refractory disease, and the feasibility of IFX SC monotherapy.

Carbon-Based Nanomaterials as Drug Delivery Agents for Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Preface to Colorectal Cancer Citing Their Markers and Existing Theranostic Approaches

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the universally established cancers with a higher incidence rate. Novel progression toward cancer prevention and cancer care among countries in transition should be considered seriously for controlling CRC. Hence, several cutting edge technologies are ongoing for high performance cancer therapeutics over the past few decades. Several drug-delivery systems of the nanoregime are relatively new in this arena compared to the previous treatment modes such as chemo- or radiotherapy to mitigate cancer. Based on this background, the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, treatment possibilities, and theragnostic markers for CRC were revealed. Since the use of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for the management of CRC has been less studied, the present review analyzes the preclinical studies on the application of carbon nanotubes for drug delivery and CRC therapy owing to their inherent properties. It also investigates the toxicity of CNTs on normal cells for safety testing and the clinical use of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) for tumor localization. To conclude, this review recommends the clinical application of carbon-based nanomaterials further for the management of CRC in diagnosis and as carriers or therapeutic adjuvants.

Real-World Study on Vedolizumab Serum Concentration, Efficacy, and Safety after the Transition from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: Single-Center Experience

Little is known about how the change from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in a real-life setting in inflammatory bowel disease patients on stable maintenance therapy affects clinical outcomes. We compared the data on vedolizumab serum trough concentration, efficacy, and safety prior to and six months after the switch from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab. In total, 24 patients, 13 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 11 with Crohn’s disease (CD), were included. Mean serum trough concentration of intravenous vedolizumab was significantly lower than mean serum trough concentration of subcutaneous vedolizumab (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between C-reactive protein levels, fecal calprotectin levels or clinical scores (Harvey–Bradshaw index or Partial Mayo score) prior to transition to subcutaneous vedolizumab and after 6 months. In four (16.7%) patients, two CD and two UC, therapy was discontinued during the follow-up period with a median of 5 months (minimum–maximum: 4–6). In all patients, therapy was discontinued due to loss of response. In total, 13 adverse events were reported by 11 patients, and the most common adverse event was COVID-19. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, subcutaneous vedolizumab has shown to be effective and safe in patients on previously established maintenance therapy with intravenous vedolizumab.

Carbon Nanotubes as Carriers in Drug Delivery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Mechanistic Analysis of Their Carcinogenic Potential, Safety Profiling and Identification of Biomarkers

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a global burden leading to millions of deaths worldwide every year. Nanomedicine refers to the use of materials at the nanoscale for drug delivery and subsequent therapeutic approaches in cancer. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are widely used as nanocarriers for therapeutic molecules such as plasmids, siRNAs, antisense agents, aptamers and molecules related to the immunotherapy for several cancers. They are usually functionalized and loaded with standard drug molecules to improve their therapeutic efficiency. Functionalization and drug loading possibly decrease the genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of CNTs. In addition, the targeted cytotoxic properties of the drug improve and undesired toxicity decreases after drug loading and/or conjugation with proteins, including antibodies. For intended drug delivery, a lysosomal pH of 5.5 is more suitable and effective for the slow and extended release of cytotoxic drugs than a physiological of pH 7.4. Remarkably, CNTs possess intrinsic antitumor properties and are usually internalized by endocytosis. After being internalized, several mechanisms are involved in the therapeutic and carcinogenic effects of CNTs. They are generally safe for therapy, and their toxicity profile remains dependent on their physicochemical properties. Moreover, the dose, route, duration of exposure, surface properties and degradative potential determine the toxicity outcomes of CNTs locally or systemically. In summary, the use of CNTs in drug delivery and NSCLC therapy, as well as their genotoxic and carcinogenic potential and the possible mechanisms, has been discussed in this review. The therapeutic index is generally high for NSCLC cells treated with drug-loaded CNTs; therefore, they are effective carriers in implementing targeted therapy for NSCLC.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients' Acceptance for Switching from Intravenous Infliximab or Vedolizumab to Subcutaneous Formulation: The Nancy Experience

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab formulations have been developed for maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. The objective of this study was to explore the inflammatory bowel disease patient's acceptance for switching from intravenous infliximab or vedolizumab to subcutaneous, as well as to describe the causes of refusal or, conversely, the factors associated with acceptance.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively recruited between June 2021 and March 2022 during their infusion of infliximab or vedolizumab in the Medical Day Hospital of Nancy University Hospital. Adult patients with an established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission were eligible for inclusion in this study if they had been treated with intravenous infliximab or vedolizumab for at least six months.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients were included in this study. Thirty-six patients (27.7%) received vedolizumab and ninety-four patients (72.3%) received infliximab. Median duration of treatment at inclusion was 7.0 years [3.0-11.0]. In this cohort, 77.7% of patients accepted the switch from intravenous infliximab or vedolizumab to subcutaneous. The main reasons for patient's refusal for switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation were fear of loss of efficacy, a more spaced-out medical follow-up, increased frequency of administration, and self-administered injection. A short duration of treatment was associated with a high switch acceptance rate (odd ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 0.9 (0.8-0.9); p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

A large majority of the patients included accepted the switch of their treatment with infliximab or vedolizumab from the intravenous form to the subcutaneous form. This study identified one predictor influencing the acceptance rate in inflammatory bowel disease population: short treatment duration. Subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab hold potential for greater patient flexibility by self-administration, reducing travel and hospital attendance for infusion.

Evidence-Based Approach to the Discontinuation of Immunomodulators or Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Biologics and immunomodulators are key drugs in the long-term treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, while they may negatively impact patients' quality of life due to concerns of adverse events, need for frequent hospital visits, and medical expenses. The basic concept of drug withdrawal should be based on the risk of relapse and the efficacy of re-treatment. Considering a number of patients may relapse even if treatment is continued, the disadvantage of discontinuation should be recognized not by all relapse after discontinuation, but by the increase in relapse.

SUMMARY

Discontinuation of immunomodulator monotherapy is associated with an increased risk of relapse. However, prolonged remission might be an indication of withdrawal, concerning the long-term adverse effect including lymphoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. When considering discontinuation from combination therapy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents with immunomodulators, therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful to understand the pharmacokinetic effect. However, recent randomized controlled trials, as well as large-scale observational studies, demonstrated that discontinuation of anti-TNF agents, but not of immunomodulators, resulted in a significantly higher risk of relapse even in deep remission. Therefore, discontinuation of anti-TNF agents should be considered with caution and close monitoring combined with fecal calprotectin may be necessary. On the other hand, evidence of not only short-term relapse rate but of the true long-term influence on the patient's quality of life should be clarified by a multidimensional approach.

KEY MESSAGES

Discontinuation of treatment should be implemented based on shared decision-making with careful interpretation of evidence and the condition.

Filgotinib for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Filgotinib is an oral Janus kinase type 1 (JAK1) selective inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on pharmacological characteristics, efficacy, and safety of filgotinib in UC.

AREAS COVERED

Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for all relevant studies reporting the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with moderate to severe UC. We particularly focused on the risk of zoster infection and venous thromboembolism compared to other JAK inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Filgotinib has remarkable efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles in the treatment of moderate-to-severe active UC. It can be used in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients. The rapid mechanism of action and its oral administration route make it a reliable therapeutic option.

An overview of ozanimod as a therapeutic option for adults with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract involving a dysregulated immune response. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is involved in immune cell regulation. S1P-receptor modulators, such as ozanimod, inhibit lymphocyte migration and have therapeutic potential in UC.

AREAS COVERED

Ozanimod is the first S1P-receptor modulator approved for the treatment of UC. It acts as a functional antagonist, causing internalization of S1P receptors on T-cells. Lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes is inhibited, and migration to sites of active inflammation is curtailed. There are several S1P-receptor subtypes, present in various organs, which inform understanding of ozanimod's side-effect profile including bradycardia and macular edema. In this review, the authors discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of ozanimod in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

EXPERT OPINION

The S1P-receptor modulator ozanimod is an oral small molecule with a rapid onset of action and a novel therapeutic mechanism in the treatment of UC. It is an effective treatment both in bio-naïve and bio-exposed patients. Although the safety profile of ozanimod looks favorable, more long-term data are needed. Further studies are required to compare ozanimod to currently available therapies to best define its positioning in UC treatment algorithms.