Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations in fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers

Clinical value of screening prenatal ultrasound combined with chromosomal microarrays in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical value of ultrasound findings in the screening of fetal chromosomal abnormalities and the analysis of risk factors for chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) abnormalities.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the datasets of 15,899 pregnant women who underwent prenatal evaluations at Affiliated Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nantong University between August 2018 and December 2022. Everyone underwent ultrasound screening, and those with abnormal findings underwent CMA to identify chromosomal abnormalities.

RESULTS

The detection rates for isolated ultrasound anomalies and combined ultrasound and CMA anomalies were 11.81% (1877/15,899) and 2.40% (381/15,899), respectively. Among all ultrasound abnormalities, detection rates for isolated ultrasound soft marker anomalies, isolated structural abnormalities, and both ultrasound soft marker anomalies with structural abnormalities were 82.91% (1872/2258), 15.99% (361/2258), and 1.11% (25/2258), respectively. The detection rate of abnormal chromosomes in pregnant women with abnormal ultrasound results was 16.87% (381/2258). The detection rates were 13.33% in cases with two or more ultrasound soft markers anomalies, 47.37% for two or more structural anomalies, and 48.00% for concomitant ultrasound soft marker and structural anomalies.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced detection rates of chromosomal anomalies in fetal malformations are achieved with specific ultrasound findings (NT thickening, cardiovascular abnormalities, and multiple soft markers) or when combined with high-risk factors (advanced maternal age, familial history, parental chromosomal anomalies, etc.). When the maternal age is over 35 and with ≥2 ultrasound soft marker anomalies accompanied with any high-risk factors, CMA testing can aid in the diagnosis of prenatal chromosomal abnormalities.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities

Objective

To explore and evaluate the value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 370 fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities received invasive prenatal diagnosis at Meizhou People's Hospital from October 2022 to December 2023. Fetal specimens were analyzed by CMA, and the detection rates of aneuploidy and pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) copy number variations (CNVs) in ultrasound structural abnormalities (malformations of fetal anatomy) and non-structural abnormalities (abnormalities of fetal nonanatomical structure) were analyzed.

Results

There were 114 (30.8%) cases with isolated ultrasound structural abnormalities, 226 (61.1%) cases with isolated non-structural abnormalities (182 isolated ultrasound soft markers abnormalities, 30 isolated fetal growth restriction (FGR), and 8 isolated abnormalities of amniotic fluid volume), and 30 (8.1%) cases with both structural and non-structural abnormalities. The overall detection rate of aneuploidy and P/LP CNVs in isolated ultrasonic structural abnormalities was 5.3%, among which cardiovascular system abnormalities were the highest. In addition, the largest number of fetuses with non-structural abnormalities was nuchal translucency (NT) thickening (n = 81), followed by ventriculomegaly (n = 29), and nasal bone dysplasia (n = 24). The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities of fetuses with abnormal ultrasound soft markers was 9.9%, and the detection rate in single abnormal ultrasound soft marker, and multiple ultrasound soft markers abnormalities was 9.7% (16/165) and 11.8% (2/17), respectively. Moreover, the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities of fetuses with FGR and structural abnormalities combined with non-structural abnormalities was 6.7% (2/30), and 13.3% (4/30), respectively.

Conclusion

The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities (aneuploidy and P/LP CNVs) varies among different fetal ultrasound abnormalities.

Chromosomal abnormalities detected by chromosomal microarray analysis and pregnancy outcomes of 4211 fetuses with high-risk prenatal indications

With the gradual liberalization of the three-child policy and the development of assisted reproductive technology in China, the number of women with high-risk pregnancies is gradually increasing. In this study, 4211 fetuses who underwent chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) with high-risk prenatal indications were analysed. The results showed that the overall prenatal detection rate of CMA was 11.4% (480/4211), with detection rates of 5.82% (245/4211) for abnormal chromosome numbers and 5.58% (235/4211) for copy number variants. Additionally, the detection rates of clinically significant copy number variants were 3.78% (159/4211) and 1.8% (76/4211) for variants of uncertain significance. The detection rates of fetal chromosomal abnormalities were 6.42% (30/467) for pregnant women with advanced maternal age (AMA), 6.01% (50/832) for high-risk maternal serum screening (MSS) results, 39.09% (224/573) with abnormal non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results, 9.21% (127/1379) with abnormal ultrasound results, and 5.1% (49/960) for other indications. Follow-up results were available for 4211 patients, including 3677 (3677/4211, 87.32%) whose infants were normal after birth, 462 (462/4211, 10.97%) who terminated their pregnancy, 51 (51/4211, 1.21%) whose infants were abnormal after birth, and 21 (21/4211, 0.50%) who refused follow-up. The results of this study demonstrate significant variation in the diagnostic rate of chromosomal microarray analysis across different indications, providing valuable guidance for clinicians to assess the applicability of CMA technology in prenatal diagnosis.

The likelihood of detecting abnormal karyotypes in fetuses with a single major anomaly or "soft" marker on ultrasonographic scanning

OBJECTIVE

Fetuses with abnormal karyotypes often exhibit distinctive ultrasonographic markers, including major anomalies and "soft" markers, indicating potential chromosomal issues. A crucial consideration arises when a single fetal anomaly is detected, raising the question of whether karyotyping is warranted, given the associated procedural risks. Our objective was to establish correlations between single fetal anomalies identified through ultrasound and chromosomal abnormalities.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study analyzed the karyotype of 1493 fetuses and detected a single ultrasonographic anomaly over a 16-year period. Karyotyping was performed using the standard karyotype technique. Moreover, data regarding the type of anomaly detected ultrasonographically, karyotype results, and outcomes following interventions were collected. Among other methods, the use of positive likelihood ratios (LR+) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound compared to karyotyping.

RESULTS

In total, an aberrant karyotype was identified in 99 fetuses (6.6%). This was most commonly observed in cases involving a "soft" marker, occurring in 27 out of 218 fetuses (12.4%). The most frequently detected aberrant karyotype resulted from aneuploidies (80.6% of cases), notably trisomy 21 (50.5%). "Soft" markers predicted chromosomal issues (LR+ = 1.9; OR = 2.4), and isolated polyhydramnios (LR+ = 1.54; OR = 1.6) showed significance in predicting fetal chromosomal aberrations.

CONCLUSION

When assessing the necessity for karyotyping in fetuses with single major anomalies or "soft" markers, it is crucial to consider individual risks for chromosomopathies, including the LR+ of the detected marker. In cases where fetuses exhibit isolated anomalies with a normal karyotype, additional diagnostic measures, such as molecular cytogenetic and molecular genetics techniques, may become necessary.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of soft ultrasound markers in prenatal detection and assessment of foetal abnormalities

Various soft markers can be detected in the ultrasonography of foetuses, which can be related to chromosomal abnormalities and increases the risk of abnormalities, or they can be considered as normal variations that can disappear due to the pregnancy progress. There are different tools to detect chromosomal abnormalities like conventional karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT), and non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). Therefore, in the present study, we aim to assess the accuracy of ultrasonic soft markers in the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities such as chromosomal structural abnormalities, aneuploidy, and triploidy, especially Trisomy 21 and Trisomy 18. A systemic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. We gathered all articles published before August 2023. We selected English studies such as retrospective and cross-sectional ones that assessed the relationship between ultrasonic soft markers and foetal chromosomal abnormalities. A total of 10 articles with 18,580 cases were included in our systematic review article that assessed the foetal abnormalities and aneuploidies by using conventional karyotyping, SNP array, CMA, and NIPT (or NIPS). Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18, and chromosomal structural abnormalities were the most common abnormalities related to ultrasonic soft markers by karyotyping; however, Trisomy 13, 47, XXY, 45, X, and mosaic chromosomal abnormalities were other abnormalities detected. Results by CMA showed Trisomy 21 and Trisomy 18 as the most common abnormalities in the foetuses also with ultrasonic soft markers, and other abnormalities were pathogenic copy-number variations, Turner (XO), polyploidy, 22q11.2deletion, and Trisomy13, respectively. It was discovered that there is a greater possibility of having pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) in the groups with multiple ultrasonic soft markers, while foetuses with ultrasonic soft markers have a decreased prevalence of CMA abnormality compared to those who had significant abnormalities or abnormal nuchal translucency. Trisomy 21 was the only abnormality found by NIPT in the groups with 1 and 2 soft markers, while groups with multiple soft markers were all normal. By using SNP array, it was identified that the rate of chromosomal abnormalities such as aneuploidy and triploidy, LOH, and CNVs was lower in the group with a single ultrasonic soft marker compared to the group with structural abnormalities in multiple systems. Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18, and chromosomal structural abnormalities were the most common chromosomal abnormalities that ultrasound soft markers could diagnose. Therefore, it is recommended to employ soft markers besides CMA, SNP array, and NIPS (or NIPT) for greater accuracy in detecting foetus abnormalities.

The genetic landscape of chromosomal aberrations in 3776 Vietnamese fetuses with clinical anomalies during pregnancy

Background: Copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) is a powerful tool to discover structural genomic variation, but limitations associated with its retrospective study design and inadequate diversity of participants can be impractical for clinical application. Aim: This study aims to use CNV-seq to assess chromosomal aberrations in pregnant Vietnamese women. Materials & methods: A large-scale study was conducted on 3776 pregnant Vietnamese women with abnormal ultrasound findings. Results: Chromosomal aberrations were found in 448 (11.86%) women. Of these, 274 (7.26%) had chromosomal aneuploidies and 174 (4.61%) carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs. Correlations were established between chromosomal aberrations and various phenotypic markers. Conclusion: This comprehensive clinical study illuminates the pivotal role of CNV-seq in prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies featuring fetal ultrasound anomalies.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses With Ultrasonographic Soft Markers: A Meta-Analysis of the Current Evidence

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonographic soft markers are normal variants, rather than fetal abnormalities, and guidelines recommend a detailed survey of fetal anatomy to determine the necessity of antenatal karyotyping. Anecdotal reports have described cases with ultrasonographic soft markers in which chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) revealed pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) despite normal results on conventional karyotyping, but CMA for ultrasonographic soft markers remains a matter of debate. In this systematic review, we evaluated the clinical significance of CMA for pregnancies with isolated ultrasonographic soft markers and a normal fetal karyotype.

METHODS

An electronic search was conducted by an experienced librarian through the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. We reviewed 3,338 articles (3,325 identified by database searching and 13 by a hand search) about isolated ultrasonographic soft markers, and seven ultrasonographic markers (choroid plexus cysts, echogenic bowel, echogenic intracardiac focus, hypoplastic nasal bone, short femur [SF], single umbilical artery, and urinary tract dilatation) were included for this study.

RESULTS

Seven eligible articles were included in the final review. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs were found in fetuses with isolated ultrasonographic soft markers and a normal karyotype. The overall prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs was 2.0% (41 of 2,048). The diagnostic yield of CMA was highest in fetuses with isolated SF (9 of 225, 3.9%).

CONCLUSION

CMA could aid in risk assessment and pregnancy counseling in pregnancies where the fetus has isolated ultrasonographic soft markers along with a normal karyotype.

Comparison of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnant Women with Fetal Ultrasonic Soft Markers

Objective

This study aimed to assess the utility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in detecting clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities among fetuses presenting ultrasonic soft markers (USMs).

Methods

A retrospective observational study, spanning from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, enrolled 539 singleton pregnant women with fetal USMs at our center. Of these, 418 cases (77.6%) underwent NIPT, while 121 cases (22.4%) opted for invasive prenatal diagnosis post-appropriate genetic counseling. Cases with high-risk NIPT results proceeded to invasive prenatal diagnosis, where conventional karyotyping and CMA were concurrently performed. Further stratification was done based on the number of USMs, classifying cases into single-USM and multiple-USM groups.

Results

Of the 24 cases (4.5%) exhibiting abnormal findings, 17 presented numerical chromosomal abnormalities, 2 featured clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs), 3 showed variants of unknown significance (VOUS), 1 displayed LOH, and 1 exhibited chromosome nine inversion. Notably, 18 cases (75%) theoretically detectable by karyotyping (eg, sizes above 10Mb) and 16 cases (66.7%) detectable by NIPT for five common aneuploidies were identified. Six submicroscopic findings (25%) were exclusively detectable by CMA. The predominant clinically relevant aberrations were observed in the thickened nuchal-translucency (TNT) group (9/35, 25.7%), followed by the multiple soft markers group (3/32, 9.3%). In the NIPT group, the false positive rate was 1.22%, and the false negative rate was 0%.

Conclusion

The prevalence of chromosome aneuploidy exceeded that of submicroscopic chromosomal imbalance in pregnant women with fetal USMs. NIPT demonstrated efficacy, particularly for soft markers like echogenic intracardiac focus. However, for those with TNT and multiple soft markers, invasive prenatal diagnosis, including CMA testing, is recommended as the primary investigative approach.

Application of Copy Number Variation Sequencing Technology in 422 Foetuses with Abnormal Ultrasound Soft Markers

Purpose

The application value of ultrasound soft indicators in prenatal diagnosis was evaluated by copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq).

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 422 pregnant women who underwent CNV-seq testing at Luoyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital between January 2020 and November 2021. The women had presented with abnormal ultrasound soft markers; those identified as high-risk through non-invasive prenatal screening were excluded.

Results

A total of 43 abnormal cases were detected in 422 pregnant women, including 24 aneuploidy (including chimerism) and 19 pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs). Based on the characteristics of ultrasound soft indicators, pregnant women were divided into five groups: isolated nuchal translucency (NT) group, combined NT group, isolated soft indicators group, combined soft indicators group and combined non-NT group. The abnormality detection rates in the five groups were 12.38% (13/105), 36.11% (13/36), 3.74% (4/103), 3.08% (2/63) and 10.09% (11/109), respectively. Statistical tests showed that the detection rate in the NT thickening combined with other abnormalities group was significantly higher than the other four groups, while there was no statistical difference in the detection rate among the other four groups.

Conclusion

When NT thickening is combined with other abnormalities, it is more likely to indicate chromosome abnormalities or CNVs, so it should be regarded seriously upon finding, and pregnant women should be referred for prenatal diagnosis according to the examination results. In addition, NT thickening is an important indicator for prenatal diagnosis and should be considered regardless of whether it occurs independently. The authors recommend CNV-seq for prenatal diagnosis to prevent missing small fragments of CNVs during traditional karyotyping.

Association analysis between chromosomal abnormalities and fetal ultrasonographic soft markers based on 15,263 fetuses

BACKGROUND

Soft markers are common prenatal ultrasonographic findings that indicate an increased risk for fetal aneuploidy. However, the association between soft markers and pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variations is still unclear, and clinicians lack clarity on which soft markers warrant a recommendation for invasive prenatal genetic testing of the fetus.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to provide guidance on ordering prenatal genetic testing for fetuses with different soft markers and to elucidate the association between specific types of chromosomal abnormalities and specific ultrasonographic soft markers.

STUDY DESIGN

Low-pass genome sequencing was performed for 15,263 fetuses, including 9123 with ultrasonographic soft markers and 6140 with normal ultrasonographic findings. The detection rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants among fetuses with various ultrasonographic soft markers were compared with that of fetuses with normal ultrasonography. The association of soft markers with aneuploidy and pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants were investigated using Fisher exact tests with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

The detection rate of aneuploidy and pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants was 3.04% (277/9123) and 3.40% (310/9123), respectively, in fetuses with ultrasonographic soft markers. An absent or a hypoplastic nasal bone was the soft marker in the second trimester with the highest diagnostic rate for aneuploidy of 5.22% (83/1591) among all isolated groups. Four types of isolated ultrasonographic soft markers, namely a thickened nuchal fold, single umbilical artery, mild ventriculomegaly, and absent or hypoplastic nasal bone, had higher diagnostic rates for pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants (P<.05; odds ratio, 1.69-3.31). Furthermore, this study found that the 22q11.2 deletion was associated with an aberrant right subclavian artery, whereas the 16p13.11 deletion, 10q26.13-q26.3 deletion, and 8p23.3-p23.1 deletion were associated with a thickened nuchal fold, and the 16p11.2 deletion and 17p11.2 deletion were associated with mild ventriculomegaly (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonographic phenotype-based genetic testing should be considered in clinical consultations. Copy number variant analysis is recommended for fetuses with an isolated thickened nuchal fold, a single umbilical artery, mild ventriculomegaly, and an absent or a hypoplastic nasal bone. A comprehensive definition of genotype-phenotype correlations in aneuploidy and pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants could provide better information for genetic counseling.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.

Application of ultrasound combined with noninvasive prenatal testing in prenatal testing

BACKGROUND

Both noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and prenatal ultrasound are widely used in clinical settings due to their safety, noninvasiveness, and accuracy, showing high detection rates for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies and structural abnormalities. However, whether the combined application of these two techniques has higher clinical applicability remains to be demonstrated.

METHODS

The clinical and laboratory data of 3,050 pregnant women who underwent NIPT were collected. The clinical feasibility and health economics of NIPT were investigated by analyzing the accuracy, postnatal follow-up results, and population applicability of NIPT. In addition, an analysis ultrasonography, NIPT, and karyotyping results were performed to evaluate the combined application of ultrasonography and NIPT in screening fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

RESULTS

NIPT could accurately detect trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and was highly sensitive and specific in detecting other autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies. The positive rates of chromosomal abnormalities in the presence of 1 or 2 or more ultrasound markers were 7.5% and 29.2%, respectively, indicating that ultrasonography combined with NIPT should be preferred for the detection of fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Health economic analysis revealed NIPT to be superior to conventional serologic screening in terms of accuracy and socioeconomics. Ultrasound and NIPT are complementary to each other and the combined techniques can improve the screening ability of fetal chromosomal abnormalities and provide clinicians with more diagnostic information.