Infliximab therapy in refractory sarcoidosis: a multicenter real-world analysis

Anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody modulates the dysregulation of Th1/Th17 cells and attenuates granuloma formation in sarcoidosis by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease characterized by non-caseating epithelioid cell granulomas. One of its immunological hallmarks is the differentiation of CD4 + naïve T cells into Th1/Th17 cells, accompanied by the release of numerous pro-inflammatory cytokines. The TL1A/DR3 signaling pathway plays a crucial role in activating effector lymphocytes, thereby triggering pro-inflammatory responses. The primary aim of this investigation was to scrutinize the impact of anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody on the dysregulation of Th1/Th17 cells and granuloma formation in sarcoidosis. Initially, the abnormal activation of the TL1A/DR3 signaling pathway in pulmonary tissues of sarcoidosis patients was confirmed using qPCR and immunohistochemistry techniques. Subsequently, employing a murine model of sarcoidosis, the inhibitory effects of anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody on the TL1A/DR3 signaling pathway in sarcoidosis were investigated through qPCR, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot experiments. The influence of anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody on granulomas was assessed through HE staining, while their effects on sarcoidosis Th1/Th17 cells and associated cytokine mRNA levels were evaluated using flow cytometry and qPCR, respectively. Immunofluorescence and Western blot experiments corroborated the inhibitory effects of anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody on the aberrant activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in sarcoidosis. The findings of this study indicate that the TL1A/DR3 signaling pathway is excessively activated in sarcoidosis. Anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody effectively inhibit this abnormal activation in sarcoidosis, thereby alleviating the dysregulation of Th1/Th17 cells and reducing the formation of pulmonary granulomas. This effect may be associated with the inhibition of the downstream PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody hold promise as a potential novel therapeutic intervention for sarcoidosis.

Efficacy and safety of Infliximab in systemic sarcoidosis according to GenPhenReSa organ-involvement phenotype: a retrospective study of 55 patients

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is currently recommended as a third-line treatment for refractory sarcoidosis. Data in function of clinical phenotype are currently lacking. We evaluated patients' characteristics and responses to infliximab according to their GenPhenReSa cluster.

METHODS

We evaluated clinical and biological characteristics of patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis who received infliximab between September 2008 and April 2019 at our centre.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (median disease duration, 87 months) received infliximab: 48 (87%) as a second- or third-line treatment, and 7 (13%) as a first-line treatment. After a median duration of 12 months, 24 (45%) and 14 (25%) patients achieved complete and partial responses, respectively, together with a significant decrease in the number of affected organs and tapering of steroid doses. All patients with neurosarcoidosis (OR 17), 90% in group 2 (ocular-cardiac-cutaneous-CNS, OR 7.4), and approximately two-thirds of those in groups 1 (abdominal organs), 4 (pulmonary-lympho-nodal), and 5 (extrapulmonary), achieved a response, whereas patients in group 3 (musculoskeletal-cutaneous) had a treatment-failure OR of 9. Infliximab could be stopped after complete remission was achieved in 7 patients: 4 relapsed after a median of 6 months. Overall, 36% of patients experienced serious adverse events, mainly infections, which led to treatment cessation in 29% of patients and caused two deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Other than patients with musculoskeletal-cutaneous involvement (group 3), infliximab led to a good response for patients with CNS (group 2) and liver (group 1) organ-predominant sarcoidosis. However, it led to serious infections and merely suspended sarcoidosis, so further research on factors predictive of relapse is needed.

[Therapeutic Pathways in Sarcoidosis. A Position Paper of the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP)]

The present recommendations on the therapy of sarcoidosis of the German Respiratory Society (DGP) was written in 2023 as a German-language supplement and update of the international guidelines of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) from 2021. It contains 5 PICO questions (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) agreed in the consensus process, which are explained in the background text of the four articles: Confirmation of diagnosis and monitoring of the disease under therapy, general therapy recommendations, therapy of cutaneous sarcoidosis, therapy of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Neurosarcoidosis and Neurologic Complications of Sarcoidosis Treatment

Sarcoidosis is an immune-mediated multisystem granulomatous disorder. Neurosarcoidosis (NS) accounts for 5% to 35% of cases. The diagnostic evaluation of NS can be a clinical challenge. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard to evaluate central nervous system NS. In almost all cases treatment is warranted. Although glucocorticoids remain the first-line therapy in patients with sarcoidosis, in NS timely initiation of second- or third-line treatment is strongly recommended. Of these, tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors are the most promising. However, the treatment itself may be responsible for/associated with developing neurologic symptoms mimicking NS. Thus, it is important to consider the possibility of drug-induced neurologic symptoms in sarcoidosis.

STAT expression and TFH1 cells in CVID granulomatosis and sarcoidosis: immunological and histopathological comparisons

Granulomatous disease is a serious complication of common variable immunodeficiency (CVID-GD) that occurs in 8-22% of these patients and can mimic sarcoidosis, with which it shares certain clinical, biological, and radiological features. However, few studies to date have compared the two pathologies immunologically and histologically. Therefore, we analyzed the immunological-histological findings for different tissue samples from ten patients with CVID-GD and compared them to those of biopsy-proven sarcoidosis. Specifically, we wanted to know whether or not the signaling abnormalities observed in sarcoidosis granulomas are also present in CVID-GD. Morphological differences were found between CVID-GD histology and classical sarcoidosis: mainly, the former's notable lymphoid hyperplasia associated with granulomas not observed in the latter. All CVID-GD involved organs contained several follicular helper-T (TFH) cells within the granulomatosis, while those cells were inconstantly and more weakly expressed in sarcoidosis. Moreover, CVID and sarcoidosis granulomas expressed the phosphorylated-signal transducer and activator of transcription (pSTAT)1 and pSTAT3 factors, regardless of the organ studied and without any significant difference between entities. Our results suggest that the macrophage-activation mechanism in CVID resembles that of sarcoidosis, thereby suggesting that Janus kinase (JAK)-STAT-pathway blockade might be useful in currently difficult-to-treat CVID-GD.

Efficacy and safety of mTOR inhibition in cutaneous sarcoidosis: a single-centre trial

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory condition that can affect various organs and tissues, causing the formation of granulomas and subsequent functional impairment. The origin of sarcoidosis remains unknown and there are few treatment options. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation is commonly seen in granulomas of patients across different tissues and has been shown to induce sarcoidosis-like granulomas in a mouse model. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus as a treatment for cutaneous sarcoidosis.

METHODS

We did a single-centre, randomised study treating patients with persistent and glucocorticoid-refractory cutaneous sarcoidosis with sirolimus at the Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna (Vienna, Austria). We recruited participants who had persistent, active, and histologically proven cutaneous sarcoidosis. We used an n-of-1 crossover design in a placebo-controlled, double-blind topical treatment period and a subsequent single-arm systemic treatment phase for 4 months in the same participants. Participants initially received either 0·1% topical sirolimus in Vaseline or placebo (Vaseline alone), twice daily. After a washout period, all participants were subsequently administered a 6 mg loading dose followed by 2 mg sirolimus solution orally once daily, aiming to achieve serum concentrations of 6 ng/mL. The primary endpoint was change in the Cutaneous Sarcoidosis Activity and Morphology Index (CSAMI) after topical or systemic treatment. All participants were included in the safety analyses, and patients having completed the respective treatment period (topical treatment or systemic treatment) were included in the primary analyses. Adverse events were assessed at each study visit by clinicians and were categorised according to their correlation with the study drug, severity, seriousness, and expectedness. This study is registered with EudraCT (2017-004930-27) and is now closed.

FINDINGS

16 participants with persistent cutaneous sarcoidosis were enrolled in the study between Sept 3, 2019, and June 15, 2021. Six (37%) of 16 participants were men, ten (63%) were women, and 15 (94%) were White. The median age of participants was 54 years (IQR 48-58). 14 participants were randomly assigned in the topical phase and 2 entered the systemic treatment phase directly. Daily topical treatment did not improve cutaneous lesions (effect estimate -1·213 [95% CI -2·505 to 0·079], p=0·066). Systemic treatment targeting trough serum concentrations of 6 ng/mL resulted in clinical and histological improvement of skin lesions in seven (70%) of ten participants (median -7·0 [95% CI -16·5 to -3·0], p=0·018). Various morphologies of cutaneous sarcoidosis, including papular, nodular, plaque, scar, and tattoo-associated sarcoidosis, responded to systemic sirolimus therapy with a long-lasting effect for more than 1 year after treatment had been stopped. There were no serious adverse events and no deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Short-term treatment with systemic sirolimus might be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with persistent glucocorticoid-refractory sarcoidosis with a long-lasting disease-modulating effect. The effect of sirolimus in granulomatous inflammation should be investigated further in large, multi-centre, randomised clinical trials.

FUNDING

Vienna Science and Technology Fund, Austrian Science Fund.

Emerging Therapeutic Options for Refractory Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: The Evidence and Proposed Mechanisms of Action

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease with heterogenous clinical phenotypes characterized by non-necrotizing granuloma formation in affected organs. Most disease either remits spontaneously or responds to corticosteroids and second-line disease-modifying therapies. These medications are associated with numerous toxicities that can significantly impact patient quality-of-life and often limit their long-term use. Additionally, a minority of patients experience chronic, progressive disease that proves refractory to standard treatments. To date, there are limited data to guide the selection of alternative third-line medications for these patients. This review will outline the pathobiological rationale behind current and emerging therapeutic agents for refractory or drug-intolerant sarcoidosis and summarize the existing clinical evidence in support of their use.

Quality of life in sarcoidosis

Having sarcoidosis often has a major impact on quality of life of patients and their families. Improving quality of life is prioritized as most important treatment aim by many patients with sarcoidosis, but current evidence and treatment options are limited. In this narrative review, we describe the impact of sarcoidosis on various aspects of daily life, evaluate determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and provide an overview of the different patient-reported outcome measures to assess HRQoL in sarcoidosis. Moreover, we review the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life for people with sarcoidosis.

Molecularly Targeted Therapies for Inflammatory Cutaneous Granulomatous Disorders: A Review of the Evidence and Implications for Understanding Disease Pathogenesis

Inflammatory cutaneous granulomatous diseases, including granuloma annulare, cutaneous sarcoidosis, and necrobiosis lipoidica, are distinct diseases unified by the hallmark of macrophage accumulation and activation in the skin. There are currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for these conditions except prednisone and repository corticotropin injection for pulmonary sarcoidosis. Treatment of these diseases has generally been guided by low-quality evidence and may involve broadly immunomodulatory medications. Development of new treatments has in part been limited by an incomplete understanding of disease pathogenesis. Recently, there has been substantial progress in better understanding the molecular pathogenesis of these disorders, opening the door for therapeutic innovation. Likewise, reported outcomes of treatment with immunologically targeted therapies may offer insights into disease pathogenesis. In this systematic review, we summarize progress in deciphering the pathomechanisms of these disorders and discuss this in the context of emerging evidence on the use of molecularly targeted therapies in treatment of these diseases.

Interstitial Lung Disease and Sarcoidosis

Interstitial lung disease (ILD), a clinically recognized group of diseases resulting in pulmonary fibrosis, affects up to 200 individuals per 100,000 in the United States. Sarcoidosis has a wide range of clinical manifestations including pulmonary fibrosis. Health disparities are prevalent in both ILD and sarcoidosis around socioeconomic status, race, gender, and geographic location. This review outlines the known health disparities, discusses possible determinants of disparities, and outlines a path to achieve equity in ILD and sarcoidosis.

Recent Clinical Studies on the Effects of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α) and Janus Kinase/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (JAK/STAT) Antibody Therapies in Refractory Cutaneous Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review

The widely accepted standard of care for chronic cutaneous sarcoidosis is corticosteroids. However, when this treatment is shown to be refractory, other interventions must be considered. In this review, we report the current progress of clinical studies on various monoclonal antibody therapies and their future potential as primary interventions for refractory cutaneous sarcoidosis. In this systematic review, clinical studies on the management of refractory cutaneous sarcoidosis were retrieved from PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. Studies were screened based on article type, publication within the last 10 years, and access to free full text. The articles selected consisted of case studies, clinical trials, and observational studies. The studies needed to focus on cases of diagnosed cutaneous sarcoidosis at the time of the study and involve adult patients resistant to corticosteroid regimens, with or without additional immunomodulators. Only interventions that included tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (e.g., infliximab and adalimumab) or Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) (e.g., ruxolitinib and tofacitinib) antibody therapy were considered. Two authors independently conducted quality assessments using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal and NIH Study Quality Assessment tools. A total of 16 clinical studies were included in this systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. Of the 16 cases included, 15 studies demonstrated partial to complete resolution of cutaneous lesions within a range of two weeks to 18 months from initiation of antibody therapy. Studies on anti-TNF-α intervention demonstrated the most adverse events, including two deaths and one case associated with cutaneous exacerbation. Studies on anti-JAK-STAT interventions demonstrate no adverse events after treatment; however, patient study size was limiting. Recent studies have shown promising potential for anti-TNF-α and anti-JAK-STAT inhibitors to become the mainstay interventions in refractory cutaneous sarcoidosis. Due to limited population studies, the current data on the efficacy and safety of antibody therapies have not yielded a standardized FDA-approved steroid-sparing treatment. Therefore, a need for more population studies on the effectiveness of third-line intervention in refractory cutaneous sarcoidosis is necessary.

Role of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents in treatment of sarcoidosis: A meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agent (anti-TNF-α) is considered an effective third-line therapy for refractory sarcoidosis,studies observing the efficacy of anti-TNF-α agents show conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

We performed an up-to-date systemic meta-analysis to determine effectiveness and further elucidate the role of anti-TNF-α in the treatment of sarcoidosis.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was carried out in PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for studies reporting the therapeutic effects of anti-TNF drugs on patients with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis, published up to April 10, 2022. The study was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under ID: CRD42022364614.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical trials written reporting the therapeutic effects of anti-TNF drugs on patients with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Statistical analyses were performed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, and the random-effects model was used. The combined overall treatment success was determined for patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary sarcoidosis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall treatment success rate wasdefined as no disease progression or improvement in symptoms.

RESULTS

Eight clinical trial articles were included in the meta-analysis; four used Infliximab, two Etanercept, one Adalimumab, and one Ustekinumab and Golimumab. The mean age of participants was 48.5 years. The duration of drug therapy ranged from 14 to 45 weeks. We found a combined overall treatment success rate, defined as no disease progression or improvement in symptoms, of 69.9% (95% CI 35.0-90.9, I2: 70%) in the pulmonary sarcoidosis group and 74.5% (95% CI 36.3-93.7, I2: 90%) in the extrapulmonary sarcoidosis group. There was no evidence of publication bias in either group.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Treatment of refractory sarcoidosis with anti-TNF-α agents was effective in both pulmonary and extrapulmonary sarcoidosis, with a slightly higher efficacy seen in extrapulmonary sarcoidosis. Further randomized controlled trials should be conducted to determine the effects of anti-TNF-α agents as a part of the management strategy of sarcoidosis. Patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis should be studied separately from patients with extrapulmonary sarcoidosis to adjust for confounding results.

Sarcoidosis, granulomas and myopathy syndromes: A clinical-pathology review

Muscle involvement in sarcoidosis is common by pathologic analysis, but symptomatic disorders are less frequent. Sarcoidosis-related muscle pathology includes non-caseating granulomas, muscle fiber changes that are diffuse or anatomically related to granulomas, and perimysial connective tissue with histiocyte-associated damage. The mechanisms by which granulomas form, enlarge and damage muscle tissues are incompletely understood. Sarcoidosis-related clinical syndromes with muscle involvement include: chronic myopathies with proximal weakness; nodular disorders; subacute onset disorders involving proximal or eye muscles; myalgia or fatigue syndromes; and, possibly, inclusion body myositis-like disorders. Corticosteroid treatment may benefit some syndromes, but clinical trials are necessary.

Epidemiology, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of neurosarcoidosis: A mono-centric retrospective study and literature review

Introduction

Neurosarcoidosis is a rare granulomatous disorder, and treatment guidelines are mainly based on retrospective studies.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study was performed to provide a detailed description of the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with neurosarcoidosis followed at Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc in Belgium. The second objective of our study was to perform a comparative literature review of neurosarcoidosis, with a focus on treatment outcomes with the use of TNF-α antagonist.

Results

Among 180 patients with sarcoidosis followed in our hospital, 22 patients with neurosarcoidosis were included in the final analysis. Our literature research identified 776 articles of which 35 articles met our inclusion criteria, including 1,793 patients diagnosed with neurosarcoidosis. In our cohort, the majority of patients (86%) were diagnosed with systemic sarcoidosis which was similar to that reported in the literature (83%). Serum CRP and calcemia were elevated only in 33 and 18% of patients, respectively. Serum lysozyme and angiotensin-converting enzyme were elevated in 79 and 16% of patients, respectively. Lumbar puncture and CSF fluid analysis were performed in 15/22 patients and were abnormal in all patients. Brain MRI was performed in 21/22 patients and showed abnormalities in 16 patients consisting of parenchymal lesions in 63%, hypothalamic-pituitary axis lesions in 38%, and meningeal enhancement in 31%. In both cohort patients, methotrexate was the most frequently used treatment (>45% of cases) with a favorable outcome in an average of 50% of patients. A TNF-α antagonist was administered in 9% of patients in our cohort and in 27% of patients in the literature review. The proportion of favorable outcomes in literature research was significantly higher in patients treated with TNF-α antagonists compared to methotrexate (p < 0.0001), mycophenolate mofetil (p < 0.0001), or azathioprine (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The results of our cohort and literature review confirm that neurosarcoidosis occurred most frequently in the context of systemic sarcoidosis. Methotrexate is the most frequent second-line therapy. The effectiveness of therapy with TNF-α antagonists is well-demonstrated and associated with a better outcome. Their earlier use during the disease course among aggressive and/or refractory neurosarcoidosis should be considered.

Cryobiopsy for pneumonitis diagnosis in NSCLC immunotherapy

Nowadays immunotherapy is considered the tip of the arrow as treatment for non-small cell lung cancer for inoperable patients. Programmed death-ligand 1 is considered a valuable marker for the success of immunotherapy. The higher the score ≥50% the more successful the treatment will be. However; previous studies have presented favorable data even for those patients where the programmed death-ligand 1 was ≤50% or even 0%, therefore it can be administered as first line treatment in these patients with the addition of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Other treatment modalities are tested as surrogates like gene therapy with immunotherapy to improve the results in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 was ≤50% or even 0%. The main issue for these patients is an adverse effect pneumonitis, in case we will present the valuable method of lung parenchyma sampling with cryobiopsy for early diagnosis of immunotherapy induced pneumonitis.