Chronic Airways Assessment Test: psychometric properties in patients with asthma and/or COPD

Cough in pulmonary rehabilitation: a retrospective analysis of responders and nonresponders

Background

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is essential for people with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), yet its impact on cough-related quality of life (CR-QoL) remains unexplored. We assessed the effects of PR on CR-QoL, described the characteristics of responders and nonresponders to PR, and explored determinants of responsiveness in this health domain in individuals with CRDs.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted. We assessed CR-QoL using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and the impact of the disease with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), before and after PR. Cut-offs of <17.05 in LCQ total score and ≥10 in CAT were used to detect low CR-QoL and medium impact of the disease. Responders were defined as achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of ≥1.3 on the LCQ total score. Pre- versus post-PR analysis involved the t-test, Wilcoxon test or McNemar test and comparisons between groups included the independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test or Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression was employed to investigate factors influencing MCID achievement.

Results

135 participants with CRDs (39% females; age 68±10 years; 61% COPD; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % pred 62.6±23.0%) were included. After PR, significant improvements were observed in all LCQ domains and CAT. 31% of participants were identified as responders in the LCQ (36% females; age 66±10 years; 62% COPD; FEV1 % pred 60.0±22.3%), showcasing significant differences in the LCQ and CAT compared to nonresponders. People with low CR-QoL and medium/high impact of the disease at baseline were 11 and 4 times more likely to respond to PR in CR-QoL, respectively.

Conclusion

PR enhances CR-QoL. Identification of CR-QoL and disease impact traits at baseline offers insights to optimise this outcome responsiveness to PR.

Unravelling the Information Contained in the Single Items of the COPD Assessment Test for Different Outcomes and Smoking Status in Patients with COPD: Results from COSYCONET

Background

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) comprises eight questions. We evaluated the information that each of the questions and the total score contributed to outcomes and characteristics of chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), including their dependence on smoking status.

Methods

Patients with COPD of the COSYCONET cohort with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 1-4 and the former grade 0 were included. The evaluated outcomes included mortality, exacerbation risk, the comorbidities asthma, cardiac disease (coronary artery disease/heart failure), osteoporosis, and emphysema, for which a reduction in carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO) <55% predicted was considered as marker. Analyses were performed by Cox proportional hazard or logistic multiple regression analyses separately for smokers and nonsmokers.

Results

In total, 2509 patients had complete data, among them 1884 nonsmokers (ex or never; 38.4% female; mean age±SD 66.1±8.5 years) and 625 current smokers (45.1% female, 61.6±7.9 years). The pattern of responses to the single questions of the CAT differed between outcome variables, as well as between smokers and nonsmokers, but in most cases the total score was superior to the single items. The CAT total score was associated with mortality (p<0.05) only in nonsmokers, while for exacerbation frequency/severity, it was of about equal importance in smokers and nonsmokers. Regarding KCO, the total score was indicative (p<0.05) only in nonsmokers. Particularly in smokers, single items could show opposite signs of their coefficients which therefore largely cancelled in the total score.

Conclusion

Our results show in detail for which outcomes single items are informative in nonsmokers and current smokers with COPD, overall being more informative in nonsmokers. Only regarding exacerbation risk, the predictive value was similar in both groups. These results might be helpful to extract as much as possible information from a COPD questionnaire that is often part of routine assessment.

Trial Registration

NCT01245933.

A protocol for a Japanese prospective cohort evaluating the features of patients with uncontrolled asthma achieving clinical remission: J-CIRCLE

BACKGROUND

Increasing expectations that biologics can be used as disease-modifying agents have introduced the concept of clinical remission (CR) in managements of severe asthma. Given the clinical relevance of computed tomography (CT) and blood biomarkers, we hypothesized that further refinement of CR criteria as well as incorporation of CT and blood biomarkers as indicators for structural and biological remission (SR, BR) would enable predicting long-term disease stability in patients with severe asthma treated with biologics.

METHODS

This Japanese multicenter prospective observational cohort will enroll patients with severe asthma who will start a new biologic (including a change from another biologic). The enrolled patients will be longitudinally followed up for 3 years. At enrollment, patients will undergo postbronchodilator spirometry, blood tests, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, chest and sinus CT, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Follow-up examinations will be performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. The rates of CR resulting from different criteria after 1 year of treatment with biologics will be compared, and factors associated with long-term disease stability after 3 years of biologic treatments will be identified.

DISCUSSION

This multicenter study in Japan will provide data that will help establish more appropriate criteria for CR, structural remission, and biological remission to predict long-term disease stability in patients with severe asthma who receive biologic therapy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto University (No. R4419, approval date June 11th, 2024).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000053771).

Fixed Airflow Obstruction in Asthma Can Be Identified Early by Low FEF25-75% and is Associated with Environmental Exposure

Purpose

This study aimed to identify environmental risk factors associated with asthmatic fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) and assess the relationship between small airway abnormalities defined by forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF25-75%) and FAO.

Patients and Methods

We analyzed data from 312 han Chinese patients with stable asthma on standard treatment. Low FEF25-75% was defined as post-bronchodilator FEF25-75% z-score <-0.8435, and FAO as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC z-score <-1.645. Exposure levels were retrospectively analyzed in relation to FAO risk in asthmatics. Asthmatics were grouped by low FEF25-75% and FAO, and lung function, environmental exposure, daily symptoms, and exacerbations in the previous year were compared cross-sectionally across groups.

Results

In retrospective analyses, pack-years of smoking in male patients (adjusted odd ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.05 [1.03-1.07], P<0.001), biomass exposure for >20 years (2.65 [1.13-6.43], P=0.027), occupational exposure for >10 years (2.01 [1.06-3.86], P=0.035) and occupational exposure for >20 years (2.67 [1.24-5.91], P=0.013) were associated with asthmatic FAO. In cross-sectional analyses, compared with the normal FEF25-75%/ asthmatics without FAO (NON-FAO) group, the low FEF25-75%/ asthmatics with FAO (FAO) group had lower FEV1 z-scores and FEV1/FVC z-scores, more pack-years and years of biomass and occupational exposure, higher Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test scores, and more frequent exacerbations. The low FEF25-75%/NON-FAO group showed the same trend, but to a lesser extent.

Conclusion

Chronic airway inflammation is not the only driver of asthmatic FAO, and management and treatment targeting environmental risk factors (smoking and biomass and occupational exposures) may slow FAO progression in asthmatics. The FEF25-75% determined by the z-score is a reliable marker of small airway abnormalities, and patients with low FEF25-75% are at greater risk for FAO, requiring more frequent follow-up.

Asthma management, focused on the use of oral corticosteroids: the opinions of Italian asthmatic patients

OBJECTIVE

Patients' perceptions of asthma symptoms, and attitudes regarding diagnosis and management, can affect their ability to reach good asthma control. The aim of the study was to explore patients' perceptions of asthma management, with focus on treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS).

METHODS

A DOXAPHARMA survey was conducted. A questionnaire with 46 multiple choice questions was completed by 50 patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, and 258 with mild-moderate controlled or partly controlled asthma. Participants were representative of Italian asthmatic patients-with medium age, long asthma duration, delayed diagnosis, poor asthma control, and frequent exacerbations.

RESULTS

Many asthmatics reported inadequate pharmacologic treatment. The majority but not all patients regularly used ICS/LABA. Oral treatment was common, mainly with OCS, particularly in severe asthmatics. One-fourth of patients did not regularly use inhaled therapy, and adherence was poor, resulting in frequent OCS use to treat exacerbations, which were common in mild-moderate cases. Patients were fairly satisfied with asthma therapies, but many had concerns about long-term corticosteroid use. Patients complained about poor management of comorbidities associated with asthma and OCS use, but were generally satisfied with their patient/doctor relationships. Many patients failed to achieve optimal health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mainly those with severe asthma who used OCS treatment and emphasized how OCS therapy impacted QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey results confirmed many problems related to mild-moderate and severe asthma management in Italy and highlighted the overuse of OCS rather than more effective and safe treatments, which had strong negative effects on HRQoL.

Design of the SPIROMICS Study of Early COPD Progression: SOURCE Study

Background

The biological mechanisms leading some tobacco-exposed individuals to develop early-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are poorly understood. This knowledge gap hampers development of disease-modifying agents for this prevalent condition.

Objectives

Accordingly, with National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute support, we initiated the SubPopulations and InteRmediate Outcome Measures In COPD Study (SPIROMICS) Study of Early COPD Progression (SOURCE), a multicenter observational cohort study of younger individuals with a history of cigarette smoking and thus at-risk for, or with, early-stage COPD. Our overall objectives are to identify those who will develop COPD earlier in life, characterize them thoroughly, and by contrasting them to those not developing COPD, define mechanisms of disease progression.

Methods/Discussion

SOURCE utilizes the established SPIROMICS clinical network. Its goal is to enroll n=649 participants, ages 30-55 years, all races/ethnicities, with ≥10 pack-years cigarette smoking, in either Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) groups 0-2 or with preserved ratio-impaired spirometry; and an additional n=40 never-smoker controls. Participants undergo baseline and 3-year follow-up visits, each including high-resolution computed tomography, respiratory oscillometry and spirometry (pre- and postbronchodilator administration), exhaled breath condensate (baseline only), and extensive biospecimen collection, including sputum induction. Symptoms, interim health care utilization, and exacerbations are captured every 6 months via follow-up phone calls. An embedded bronchoscopy substudy involving n=100 participants (including all never-smokers) will allow collection of lower airway samples for genetic, epigenetic, genomic, immunological, microbiome, mucin analyses, and basal cell culture.

Conclusion

SOURCE should provide novel insights into the natural history of lung disease in younger individuals with a smoking history, and its biological basis.

Analysis of the relationship between comorbid obstructive sleep apnea and clinical outcomes in patients with asthma in Japan

BACKGROUND

Asthma and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are prevalent chronic respiratory disorders, which often coexist and interact with each other. Obesity is an important risk factor shared by them. The rate of obesity is lower in Japan versus Western countries. Hence, the co-existence of asthma and OSA has not been investigated in Japan.

METHODS

Ninety-seven outpatients with asthma were recruited. Patients wore a portable monitor for sleep study. Background data, pulmonary function, blood tests, and patient-reported outcomes including gastroesophageal reflux disease, sleepiness, sleep quality, asthma control, cough and respiratory symptoms, and health status, were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 19 (19.6 %), 40 (41.2 %), 24 (24.7 %), and 14 (14.4 %) were classified into non-, mild, moderate, and severe OSA groups. Non-OSA patients were younger than those in other groups (p < 0.05). The BMI of patients with moderate and severe OSA, was higher than that of non-OSA patients (p < 0.05). Pulmonary function, FeNO, serum IgE, and the number of peripheral eosinophils were not significantly different between groups. Nonetheless, compared with the other groups, treatment step was the highest, and the Asthma Control Test, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, and Asthma Health Questionnaire-33 yielded worst scores in the severe OSA group, and predicted the severe OSA after adjustment by BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate and severe OSA are highly prevalent among patients with asthma in Japan. Pulmonary function did not differ between groups. However, patients with asthma and severe OSA were linked to more asthma treatment, worse asthma control, more symptoms and cough, and worse health status.

Measuring burden of disease in both asthma and COPD by merging the ACQ and CCQ: less is more?

Symptoms of asthma and COPD often overlap, and both diseases can co-exist in one patient. The asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) and clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) were developed to assess disease burden in respectively asthma or COPD. This study explores the possibility of creating a new questionnaire to assess disease burden in all obstructive lung diseases by integrating and reducing questions of the ACQ and CCQ. Data of patients with asthma, COPD and asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) were collected from a primary and secondary care center. Patients completed ACQ and CCQ on the same day. Linear regression tested correlations. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used for item reduction. The secondary cohort with asthma and COPD patients was used for initial question selection (development cohort). These results were reproduced in the primary care cohort and secondary cohort of patients with ACO. The development cohort comprised 252 patients with asthma and 96 with COPD. Correlation between ACQ and CCQ in asthma was R = 0.82, and in COPD R = 0.83. PCA determined a selection of 9 questions. Reproduction in primary care data (asthma n = 1110, COPD n = 1041, ACO = 355) and secondary care data of ACO patients (n = 53) resulted in similar correlations and PCA-derived selection of questions. In conclusion, PCA determined a selection of nine questions of the ACQ and CCQ: working title 'the Obstructive Lung Disease Questionnaire'. These results suggest that this pragmatic set of questions might be sufficient to assess disease burden in obstructive lung disease in both primary as secondary care.

The many faces of COPD in real life: a longitudinal analysis of the NOVELTY cohort

Background

The diagnosis of COPD requires the demonstration of non-fully reversible airflow limitation by spirometry in the appropriate clinical context. Yet, there are patients with symptoms and relevant exposures suggestive of COPD with either normal spirometry (pre-COPD) or preserved ratio but impaired spirometry (PRISm). Their prevalence, clinical characteristics and associated outcomes in a real-life setting are unclear.

Methods

To investigate them, we studied 3183 patients diagnosed with COPD by their attending physician included in the NOVELTY study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02760329), a global, 3-year, observational, real-life cohort that included patients recruited from both primary and specialist care clinics in 18 countries.

Results

We found that 1) approximately a quarter of patients diagnosed with (and treated for) COPD in real life did not fulfil the spirometric diagnostic criteria recommended by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), and could be instead categorised as pre-COPD (13%) or PRISm (14%); 2) disease burden (symptoms and exacerbations) was highest in GOLD 3-4 patients (exacerbations per person-year (PPY) 0.82) and lower but similar in those in GOLD 1-2, pre-COPD and PRISm (exacerbations range 0.27-0.43 PPY); 3) lung function decline was highest in pre-COPD and GOLD 1-2, and much less pronounced in PRISm and GOLD 3-4; 4) PRISm and pre-COPD were not stable diagnostic categories and change substantially over time; and 5) all-cause mortality was highest in GOLD 3-4, lowest in pre-COPD, and intermediate and similar in GOLD 1-2 and PRISm.

Conclusions

Patients diagnosed COPD in a real-life clinical setting present great diversity in symptom burden, progression and survival, warranting medical attention.

Symptom Burden, Health Status, and Productivity in Patients with Uncontrolled and Controlled Severe Asthma in NOVELTY

Background

Few studies have quantified symptom burden, health status, and productivity in patients with uncontrolled and controlled severe asthma. Up-to-date, real-world, global evidence is needed.

Objective

To quantify symptom burden, health status, and productivity in patients with uncontrolled and controlled severe asthma using baseline data from the NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY (NOVELTY; NCT02760329).

Methods

NOVELTY included patients aged ≥18 years (or ≥12 years in some countries) from primary care and specialist centres in 19 countries, with a physician-assigned diagnosis of asthma, asthma+chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or COPD. Disease severity was physician-assessed. Uncontrolled severe asthma was defined by an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score <20 and/or severe physician-reported exacerbations in the previous year; controlled severe asthma required an ACT score ≥20 and no severe exacerbations. Assessment of symptom burden included Respiratory Symptoms Questionnaire (RSQ) and ACT score. Assessment of health status included St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) index value, and EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Score (EQ-VAS). Assessment of productivity loss included absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, and activity impairment.

Results

Of 1652 patients with severe asthma, asthma was uncontrolled in 1078 (65.3%; mean age 52.6 years, 65.8% female) and controlled in 315 (19.1%; mean age 55.2 years, 56.5% female). With uncontrolled versus controlled severe asthma, symptom burden was higher (mean RSQ score 7.7 vs 2.5), health status more impaired (mean SGRQ total score 47.5 vs 22.4; mean EQ-5D-5L index value 0.68 vs 0.90; mean EQ-VAS score 64.1 vs 78.1), and productivity lower (presenteeism 29.3% vs 10.5%).

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the symptom burden of uncontrolled severe asthma compared with controlled severe asthma and its impact on patient health status and productivity, and support the need for interventions to improve control of severe asthma.