1
|
Fousseni S, Ngangue P, Barro A, Ramde SW, Bihina LT, Ngoufack MN, Bayoulou S, Kiki GM, Salfo O. Navigating the Road to Immunization Equity: Systematic Review of Challenges in Introducing New Vaccines into Sub-Saharan Africa's Health Systems. Vaccines (Basel) 2025; 13:269. [PMID: 40266105 PMCID: PMC11945900 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13030269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2024] [Revised: 02/18/2025] [Accepted: 02/28/2025] [Indexed: 04/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Over the past 50 years, developing new vaccines has been pivotal in responding to emerging and re-emerging diseases globally. However, despite substantial partner support, introducing new vaccines in sub-Saharan Africa remains challenging. This systematic review documents the barriers to new vaccine introduction in sub-Saharan Africa by distinguishing between vaccines integrated into routine immunization programs and those introduced primarily for outbreak response. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across five databases for articles published in English or French on the challenges of new vaccine introduction in sub-Saharan Africa. Three reviewers screened articles independently based on the titles and abstracts, with full-text assessments conducted for inclusion. Data were analyzed thematically and synthesized narratively. Results: A total of 796 articles were retrieved from the five databases. Following the screening, 33 articles were finally retained and included in the review. These articles concerned the introduction of eight new vaccines (malaria vaccine, COVID-19 vaccine, HPV vaccine, Ebola vaccine, cholera vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, and typhoid vaccine). The analyses revealed coordination and financing challenges for six vaccines in seventeen countries, acceptability challenges for five vaccines in ten countries, logistical challenges for two vaccines in six countries, and quality service delivery challenges for three vaccines in thirteen countries. Conclusions: Addressing the challenges of introducing new vaccines in sub-Saharan Africa requires targeted, evidence-based strategies. Prioritizing political commitment, innovative funding, public education, workforce development, and infrastructure improvements will strengthen immunization systems and enable timely vaccine delivery. Collaborative efforts and a focus on local context can advance equitable health outcomes, safeguard public health, and support global immunization goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soulama Fousseni
- School of Public Health, Texila American University of Zambia, Lilayi 10101, Zambia;
| | - Patrice Ngangue
- Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Abibata Barro
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Training and Research in Health Sciences and Education, Ouagadougou 01 BP 25, Burkina Faso;
| | | | | | | | - Souleymane Bayoulou
- United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Ouagadougou 01 BP 575, Burkina Faso;
| | - Gbetogo Maxime Kiki
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, QC G9A 1R8, Canada;
| | - Ouedraogo Salfo
- School of Public Health, Texila American University of Zambia, Lilayi 10101, Zambia;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chutiyami M, Saravanakumar P, Bello UM, Salihu D, Adeleye K, Kolo MA, Dawa KK, Hamina D, Bhandari P, Sulaiman SK, Sim J. Malaria vaccine efficacy, safety, and community perception in Africa: a scoping review of recent empirical studies. Infection 2024; 52:2007-2028. [PMID: 38441731 PMCID: PMC11499420 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02196-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/24/2024]
Abstract
AIM The review summarizes the recent empirical evidence on the efficacy, safety, and community perception of malaria vaccines in Africa. METHODS Academic Search Complete, African Journals Online, CINAHL, Medline, PsychInfo, and two gray literature sources were searched in January 2023, and updated in June 2023. Relevant studies published from 2012 were included. Studies were screened, appraised, and synthesized in line with the review aim. Statistical results are presented as 95% Confidence Intervals and proportions/percentages. RESULTS Sixty-six (N = 66) studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the vaccines identified, overall efficacy at 12 months was highest for the R21 vaccine (N = 3) at 77.0%, compared to the RTS,S vaccine (N = 15) at 55%. The efficacy of other vaccines was BK-SE36 (11.0-50.0%, N = 1), ChAd63/MVA ME-TRAP (- 4.7-19.4%, N = 2), FMP2.1/AS02A (7.6-9.9%, N = 1), GMZ2 (0.6-60.0%, N = 5), PfPZ (20.0-100.0%, N = 5), and PfSPZ-CVac (24.8-33.6%, N = 1). Injection site pain and fever were the most common adverse events (N = 26), while febrile convulsion (N = 8) was the most reported, vaccine-related Serious Adverse Event. Mixed perceptions of malaria vaccines were found in African communities (N = 17); awareness was generally low, ranging from 11% in Tanzania to 60% in Nigeria (N = 9), compared to willingness to accept the vaccines, which varied from 32.3% in Ethiopia to 96% in Sierra Leone (N = 15). Other issues include availability, logistics, and misconceptions. CONCLUSION Malaria vaccines protect against malaria infection in varying degrees, with severe side effects rarely occurring. Further research is required to improve vaccine efficacy and community involvement is needed to ensure successful widespread use in African communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Chutiyami
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Priya Saravanakumar
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Umar Muhammad Bello
- Department of Physiotherapy and Paramedicine, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Dauda Salihu
- College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khadijat Adeleye
- College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | | | - Kabiru Kasamu Dawa
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Education, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| | - Dathini Hamina
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria
| | - Pratibha Bhandari
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Jenny Sim
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Development, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ansar F, Azzam A, Rauf MS, Ajmal Z, Asad Ullah G, Rauf S, Akram R, Ghauri FK, Chudhary F, Iftikhar H, Iqbal A, Ahmad MB. Global Analysis of RTS, S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine Acceptance Rates and Influencing Factors: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e60678. [PMID: 38899238 PMCID: PMC11186483 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Malaria remains a significant global health challenge, with Plasmodium parasites transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite historical efforts, malaria continues to affect millions worldwide, particularly in tropical regions. This systematic review aimed to assess the acceptability of the RTS, S/AS01 malaria vaccine among diverse populations. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across databases such as Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, and Medline. Studies were included based on specific criteria, including observational and cross-sectional designs involving adults. Data extraction and analysis were conducted meticulously, encompassing key variables related to vaccine acceptance rates and influencing factors. Analysis of 18 studies involving 18,561 participants revealed an overall malaria vaccine acceptance rate of 87.51%, ranging from 32.26% to 99.30%. Significant variations were observed based on demographics, with Ghana and Nigeria reporting high acceptance rates. Factors influencing acceptance included knowledge levels, past vaccination experiences, community preferences, and engagement in malaria prevention behaviors. Concerns about adverse reactions and regional disparities were noted as potential barriers to acceptance. This review highlights the importance of understanding public perceptions and concerns regarding malaria vaccines to enhance vaccine coverage and uptake. Tailored communication strategies, advocacy efforts, and targeted education interventions are crucial for addressing misconceptions and increasing vaccine acceptance. Policy recommendations should consider demographic and regional factors to ensure effective implementation of malaria vaccination programs, ultimately contributing to global malaria prevention efforts and public health initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farrukh Ansar
- Department of Medicine, Alkhidmat Raazi Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | - Abdullah Azzam
- Department of Medicine, Alkhidmat Raazi Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | - Mohammad S Rauf
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Northwest General Hospital, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Zeeshan Ajmal
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Gulab Devi Hospital, Lahore, PAK
| | - Gohar Asad Ullah
- Department of Medicine, Alkhidmat Raazi Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | - Shiza Rauf
- Department of Medicine, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, GBR
| | - Rabia Akram
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, PAK
| | - Fatima K Ghauri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Quaid-E-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, PAK
| | - Fizza Chudhary
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Niazi Medical & Dental College, Sargodha, PAK
| | - Hamdah Iftikhar
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Rai Medical College, Sargodha, PAK
| | - Ashir Iqbal
- Department of Medicine, Alkhidmat Raazi Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Emmanuel BN, Ishaq AN, Akunne OZ, Saidu UF. Evaluating the knowledge, attitude, perception, and readiness of caregivers of under 5-year-old children to accept malaria vaccine in Nigeria. Clin Exp Vaccine Res 2024; 13:121-131. [PMID: 38752001 PMCID: PMC11091434 DOI: 10.7774/cevr.2024.13.2.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The global burden of disease and mortality is greatly influenced by malaria, particularly in children. Nigeria alone accounts for about 25% of global malaria cases and fatalities. Despite efforts to control and eliminate malaria, conventional treatments have limitations, prompting the need for a vaccine. However, while efforts have focused on researching and developing malaria vaccines, less attention has been given to public acceptance and preparedness for vaccination. Materials and Methods The study employed a cross-sectional approach to assess the knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of caregivers towards the malaria vaccine. Data were collected through a physical and online survey among a representative sample of caregivers across the six geopolitical regions of Nigeria. The data was analyzed using principal component analysis and percentages. Results Out of 347 respondents, 180 (51%) men, 165 (46.6%) women, 2 (0.5%) transgender, 156 (45%) rural settlers, and 191 (55%) urban settlers were identified in this study. The study reported an overall acceptance rate of 78.4% and 21.6% resistance rate. The age group between 21-30 years recorded the highest 207 (59.6%). A significant number of participants, 252 (59.6%), held at least a higher or post-secondary certificate, out of which 193 (55.6%) demonstrated strong readiness to accept the malaria vaccine. The study showed that fear of adverse effects was the main reason for malaria vaccine resistance among caregivers. Conclusion This study's findings offer valuable insights into caregivers' knowledge about the malaria vaccine, highlighting the factors that impact the acceptance of the malaria vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blessing Nkechi Emmanuel
- Department of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola, Nigeria
| | - Abubakar Nuhu Ishaq
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
| | - Olisaemeka Zikora Akunne
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Umar Faruk Saidu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ratcliffe NA, Mello CB, Castro HC, Dyson P, Figueiredo M. Immune Reactions of Vector Insects to Parasites and Pathogens. Microorganisms 2024; 12:568. [PMID: 38543619 PMCID: PMC10974449 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12030568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This overview initially describes insect immune reactions and then brings together present knowledge of the interactions of vector insects with their invading parasites and pathogens. It is a way of introducing this Special Issue with subsequent papers presenting the latest details of these interactions in each particular group of vectors. Hopefully, this paper will fill a void in the literature since brief descriptions of vector immunity have now been brought together in one publication and could form a starting point for those interested and new to this important area. Descriptions are given on the immune reactions of mosquitoes, blackflies, sandflies, tsetse flies, lice, fleas and triatomine bugs. Cellular and humoral defences are described separately but emphasis is made on the co-operation of these processes in the completed immune response. The paper also emphasises the need for great care in extracting haemocytes for subsequent study as appreciation of their fragile nature is often overlooked with the non-sterile media, smearing techniques and excessive centrifugation sometimes used. The potential vital role of eicosanoids in the instigation of many of the immune reactions described is also discussed. Finally, the priming of the immune system, mainly in mosquitoes, is considered and one possible mechanism is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norman Arthur Ratcliffe
- Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA28PP, UK
- Biology Institute, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-130, RJ, Brazil; (C.B.M.); (H.C.C.)
| | - Cicero Brasileiro Mello
- Biology Institute, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-130, RJ, Brazil; (C.B.M.); (H.C.C.)
| | - Helena Carla Castro
- Biology Institute, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-130, RJ, Brazil; (C.B.M.); (H.C.C.)
| | - Paul Dyson
- Institute of Life Science, Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA28PP, UK; (P.D.); (M.F.)
| | - Marcela Figueiredo
- Institute of Life Science, Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA28PP, UK; (P.D.); (M.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Röbl K, Fischer HT, Delamou A, Mbawah AK, Geurts B, Feddern L, Baldé H, Kaba I, Pozo-Martin F, Weishaar H, Menelik-Obbarius S, Burger G, Diaconu V, Dörre A, El Bcheraoui C. Caregiver acceptance of malaria vaccination for children under 5 years of age and associated factors: cross-sectional household survey, Guinea and Sierra Leone, 2022. Malar J 2023; 22:355. [PMID: 37986067 PMCID: PMC10662512 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04783-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malaria is a leading cause of death and reduced life span in Guinea and Sierra Leone, where plans for rolling out the malaria vaccine for children are being made. There is little evidence about caregiver acceptance rates to guide roll-out policies. To inform future vaccine implementation planning, this analysis aimed to assess potential malaria vaccine acceptance by caregivers and identify factors associated with acceptance in Guinea and Sierra Leone. METHODS A cross-sectional household survey using lot quality assurance sampling was conducted in three regions per country between May 2022 and August 2022. The first survey respondent in each household provided sociodemographic information. A household member responsible for childcare shared their likelihood of accepting a malaria vaccine for their children under 5 years and details about children's health. The prevalence of caregiver vaccine acceptance was calculated and associated factors were explored using multivariable logistic regression modelling calculating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Caregivers in 76% of 702 sampled households in Guinea and 81% of 575 households in Sierra Leone were accepting of a potential vaccine for their children. In both countries, acceptance was lower in remote areas than in urban areas (Guinea: aOR 0.22 [95%CI 0.09-0.50], Sierra Leone: 0.17 [0.06-0.47]). In Guinea, acceptance was lower among caregivers living in the richest households compared to the poorest households (0.10 [0.04-0.24]), among those whose children were tested for malaria when febrile (0.54 [0.34-0.85]) and in households adopting more preventative measures against malaria (0.39 [0.25-0.62]). Better knowledge of the cause of malaria infection was associated with increased acceptance (3.46 [1.01-11.87]). In Sierra Leone, vaccine acceptance was higher among caregivers living in households where the first respondent had higher levels of education as compared to lower levels (2.32 [1.05-5.11]). CONCLUSION In both countries, malaria vaccine acceptance seems promising for future vaccine roll-out programmes. Policy makers might consider regional differences, sociodemographic factors, and levels of knowledge about malaria for optimization of implementation strategies. Raising awareness about the benefits of comprehensive malaria control efforts, including vaccination and other preventive measures, requires attention in upcoming campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Röbl
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch-Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Postgraduate Training for Applied Epidemiology (PAE), Robert Koch-Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- ECDC Fellowship Programme, Field Epidemiology Path (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Gustav III:S Boulevard 40, 16973, Solna, Sweden
| | - Hanna-Tina Fischer
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch-Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexandre Delamou
- Centre d'Excellence Africain pour la Prévention et le Contrôle des Maladies Transmissibles (CEA-PCMT), Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry (UGANC), Dixinn, PoBox 1017, Conakry, Guinea
- Faculté des sciences techniques de la santé (FSTS), Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry (UGANC), Conakry, Guinea
| | - Abdul Karim Mbawah
- College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences (COMAHS), University of Sierra Leone, Connaught Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Brogan Geurts
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch-Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lukas Feddern
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch-Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Habibata Baldé
- Centre d'Excellence Africain pour la Prévention et le Contrôle des Maladies Transmissibles (CEA-PCMT), Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry (UGANC), Dixinn, PoBox 1017, Conakry, Guinea
- Faculté des sciences techniques de la santé (FSTS), Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry (UGANC), Conakry, Guinea
| | - Ibrahima Kaba
- Centre d'Excellence Africain pour la Prévention et le Contrôle des Maladies Transmissibles (CEA-PCMT), Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry (UGANC), Dixinn, PoBox 1017, Conakry, Guinea
- Faculté des sciences techniques de la santé (FSTS), Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry (UGANC), Conakry, Guinea
| | - Francisco Pozo-Martin
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch-Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heide Weishaar
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch-Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sara Menelik-Obbarius
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch-Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gerrit Burger
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch-Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Viorela Diaconu
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch-Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Achim Dörre
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch-Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Charbel El Bcheraoui
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch-Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cardona-Arias JA, Salas-Zapata W, Carmona-Fonseca J. A systematic review of mixed studies on malaria in Colombia 1980-2022: what the "bifocal vision" discovers. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1169. [PMID: 37330477 PMCID: PMC10276438 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16098-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Mixed methods are essential in public health research and malaria control, because they allow grasping part of the complexity and diversity of the factors that determine health-disease. This study analyzes the mixed studies on malaria in Colombia, 1980-2022, through a systematic review in 15 databases and institutional repositories. The methodological quality was assessed with Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR). The qualitative and quantitative findings were grouped into a four-level hierarchical matrix. The epidemiological profile of malaria morbidity, from traditional epidemiology, has been sustained by environmental problems, armed conflict, individual risk behaviors, and low adherence to recommendations from health institutions. However, the qualitative component reveals deeper causes that are less studied, of greater theoretical complexity, and that reflect challenges to design and implement health interventions, such as socioeconomic and political crises, poverty, and the neoliberal orientation in the malaria control policy; the latter reflected in the change in the role of the State, the fragmentation of control actions, the predominance of insurance over social assistance, the privatization of the provision of health services, the individualistic and economistic predominance of health, and low connection with popular tradition and community initiatives. The above confirms the importance of expanding mixed studies as a source of evidence to improve malaria research and control models in Colombia, and to identify the underlying causes of the epidemiological profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jaime Carmona-Fonseca
- Research group "Salud y Comunidad César Uribe Piedrahíta" School of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mumtaz H, Nadeem A, Bilal W, Ansar F, Saleem S, Khan QA, Tango T, Farkouh C, Belay NF, Verma R, Farkouh M, Saqib M. Acceptance, availability, and feasibility of RTS, S/AS01 malaria vaccine: A review. Immun Inflamm Dis 2023; 11:e899. [PMID: 37382251 PMCID: PMC10266133 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In malaria-stricken regions, malaria continues to be one of the primary causes of mortality for children. The number of malaria-related fatalities has drastically decreased because of artemisinin-based pharmacological regimens. METHODS Two independent researchers did a comprehensive literature search using PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar from its inception to September 2022. RESULTS After evaluating RTS, S/AS01 for its safety, effectiveness, and feasibility, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued a favorable conclusion. It was suggested that the RTS, S malaria vaccine be used extensively by the World Health Organization on October 6, 2021. The successful pilot program testing the malaria vaccine in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi served as the basis for this proposal. CONCLUSION Several challenges need to be addressed to ensure the success of vaccination programs. From the acceptability perspective, issues such as inadequate community engagement, concerns about side effects, and issues with the delivery and quality of healthcare services can affect the acceptance of the vaccine. From the feasibility standpoint, factors such as lack of transportation or long distances to healthcare facilities and the perception of completion of the vaccination calendar can affect the feasibility of the vaccine. Lastly, the availability of the vaccine is also a major concern as it may not be readily available to meet the demands.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ramelow J, Keleta Y, Niu G, Wang X, Li J. Plasmodium parasitophorous vacuole membrane protein Pfs16 promotes malaria transmission by silencing mosquito immunity. J Biol Chem 2023:104824. [PMID: 37196765 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
With rising cases for the first time in years, malaria remains a significant public health burden. The sexual stage of the malaria parasite infects mosquitoes to transmit malaria from host to host. Hence, an infected mosquito plays an essential role in malaria transmission. Plasmodium falciparum is the most dominant and dangerous malaria pathogen. Previous studies identified a sexual stage-specific protein 16 (Pfs16) localized to the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM). Here we elucidate the function of Pfs16 during malaria transmission. Our structural analysis identified Pfs16 as an alpha-helical integral membrane protein with one transmembrane domain connecting to two regions across PVM. ELISA assays showed that insect cell-expressed recombinant Pfs16 (rPfs16) interacted with An. gambiae midguts, and microscopy found that rPfs16 bound to midgut epithelial cells. Transmission-blocking assays demonstrated that polyclonal antibodies against Pfs16 significantly reduced the number of oocysts in mosquito midguts. However, on the contrary, feeding rPfs16 increased the number of oocysts. Further analysis revealed that Pfs16 reduced the activity of mosquito midgut caspase 3/7, a key enzyme in the mosquito Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) immune pathway. We conclude that Pfs16 facilitates parasites to invade mosquito midguts by actively silencing the mosquito's innate immunity through its interaction with the midgut epithelial cells. Therefore, Pfs16 is a potential target to control malaria transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Ramelow
- Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - Yacob Keleta
- Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - Guodong Niu
- Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - Xiaohong Wang
- Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - Jun Li
- Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA; Biomolecular Sciences Institute, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sulaiman SK, Musa MS, Tsiga-Ahmed FI, Dayyab FM, Sulaiman AK, Bako AT. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of caregiver acceptance of malaria vaccine for under-five children in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278224. [PMID: 36455209 PMCID: PMC9715017 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malaria is the second leading cause of death in children after diarrheal disease, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) accounting for over 9 in 10 incidence and deaths. Widespread acceptance and uptake of the RTS,S vaccine, recently approved by the world health organization (WHO), is projected to significantly reduce malaria incidence and deaths. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim to determine the malaria vaccine acceptance rate and the factors associated with acceptance. METHODS We searched six databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane, African Index Medicus, The Regional Office for Africa Library, and WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing (IRIS) to identify studies evaluating the malaria vaccine acceptance rate. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they were original articles published in the English language in peer-reviewed journals and assessed the prevalence of willingness to accept a free malaria vaccine, and not qualitative. The risk of publication bias was checked using both Beggar's funnel plot and Egger's test, while the I2 statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity of the included studies. Study quality was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to evaluate the pooled prevalence of malaria vaccine acceptance. The protocol for this article was registered prospectively on the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), with ID number CRD42022334282). RESULTS Our analysis included 11 studies with a total sample size of 14, 666 participants. The aggregate malaria vaccine acceptance rate was 95.3% (95% CI:93.0%-97.2%). Among the general population, the acceptance rate was 96.3% (95% CI:92.0%-99.0%) and among mothers, it was 94.4% (95% CI:90.8%-97.2%). By country, Nigeria had the highest acceptance rate (97.6%, 95% CI:96.0%-98.8%), followed by Ghana (94.6%, 95% CI:93.8%-95.3%) and Tanzania (92.5%, 95% CI:84.4%-97.8%). Sociodemographic determinants of vaccine acceptance included place of residence, tribe, age, sex, occupation, and religion. Reasons for low acceptance included safety concerns, efficacy profile, vaccine's requirement for multiple injections, and poor level of awareness. CONCLUSION Future efforts should be focused on identifying factors that may improve the actual uptake of the RTS,S vaccine in malaria-endemic communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muhammad Sale Musa
- Department of Medicine, Yobe State University Teaching Hospital, Damaturu, Nigeria
| | - Fatimah Ismail Tsiga-Ahmed
- Department of Community Medicine, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria
- Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Farouq Muhammad Dayyab
- Infectious Diseases Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
- Department of Medicine, Kwanar Dawaki Isolation Center Kano, Kano, Kano State, Nigeria
- Department of Medicine, King Hamad University Hospital, Muharraq, Bahrain
| | - Abdulwahab Kabir Sulaiman
- Department of Medicine, Kwanar Dawaki Isolation Center Kano, Kano, Kano State, Nigeria
- Murtala Muhammad Specialist Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Abdulaziz Tijjani Bako
- Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aleshnick M, Florez-Cuadros M, Martinson T, Wilder BK. Monoclonal antibodies for malaria prevention. Mol Ther 2022; 30:1810-1821. [PMID: 35395399 PMCID: PMC8979832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies are highly specific proteins that are cloned from a single B cell and bind to a single epitope on a pathogen. These laboratory-made molecules can serve as prophylactics or therapeutics for infectious diseases and have an impressive capacity to modulate the progression of disease, as demonstrated for the first time on a large scale during the COVID-19 pandemic. The high specificity and natural starting point of monoclonal antibodies afford an encouraging safety profile, yet the high cost of production remains a major limitation to their widespread use. While a monoclonal antibody approach to abrogating malaria infection is not yet available, the unique life cycle of the malaria parasite affords many opportunities for such proteins to act, and preliminary research into the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in preventing malaria infection, disease, and transmission is encouraging. This review examines the current status and future outlook for monoclonal antibodies against malaria in the context of the complex life cycle and varied antigenic targets expressed in the human and mosquito hosts, and provides insight into the strengths and limitations of this approach to curtailing one of humanity’s oldest and deadliest diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Aleshnick
- Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Thomas Martinson
- Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon, USA
| | - Brandon K Wilder
- Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon, USA; Department of Parasitology, U.S. Naval Medical Research 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Howard GP, Bender NG, Khare P, López-Gutiérrez B, Nyasembe V, Weiss WJ, Simecka JW, Hamerly T, Mao HQ, Dinglasan RR. Immunopotentiation by Lymph-Node Targeting of a Malaria Transmission-Blocking Nanovaccine. Front Immunol 2021; 12:729086. [PMID: 34512663 PMCID: PMC8432939 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.729086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A successful malaria transmission blocking vaccine (TBV) requires the induction of a high antibody titer that leads to abrogation of parasite traversal of the mosquito midgut following ingestion of an infectious bloodmeal, thereby blocking the cascade of secondary human infections. Previously, we developed an optimized construct UF6b that elicits an antigen-specific antibody response to a neutralizing epitope of Anopheline alanyl aminopeptidase N (AnAPN1), an evolutionarily conserved pan-malaria mosquito midgut-based TBV target, as well as established a size-controlled lymph node targeting biodegradable nanoparticle delivery system that leads to efficient and durable antigen-specific antibody responses using the model antigen ovalbumin. Herein, we demonstrate that co-delivery of UF6b with the adjuvant CpG oligodeoxynucleotide immunostimulatory sequence (ODN ISS) 1018 using this biodegradable nanoparticle vaccine delivery system generates an AnAPN1-specific immune response that blocks parasite transmission in a standard membrane feeding assay. Importantly, this platform allows for antigen dose-sparing, wherein lower antigen payloads elicit higher-quality antibodies, therefore less antigen-specific IgG is needed for potent transmission-reducing activity. By targeting lymph nodes directly, the resulting immunopotentiation of AnAPN1 suggests that the de facto assumption that high antibody titers are needed for a TBV to be successful needs to be re-examined. This nanovaccine formulation is stable at -20°C storage for at least 3 months, an important consideration for vaccine transport and distribution in regions with poor healthcare infrastructure. Together, these data support further development of this nanovaccine platform for malaria TBVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory P Howard
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Nicole G Bender
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Prachi Khare
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Borja López-Gutiérrez
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Vincent Nyasembe
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - William J Weiss
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and UNTHSC Preclinical Services, University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Jerry W Simecka
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and UNTHSC Preclinical Services, University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Timothy Hamerly
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Hai-Quan Mao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, United States
| | - Rhoel R Dinglasan
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|