Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study

Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the current evidence that compares limited lymph node dissection with extended lymph node dissection in older adult patients (≥65 years) coursing with resectable GC. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies before 2018 were selected using a systematic review by Mogal et al. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies comparing limited lymph node dissection versus extended lymph node dissection in patients with resectable GC taken to gastrectomy. Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 5056 patients were included. There were not any statistically significant differences in OS (HR = 1.04, CI95% = 0.72-1.51), RFS (HR = 0.92, CI95% = 0.62-1.38), or CSS (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 0.74-2.10) between older adult patients taken to limited and extended lymphadenectomy in addition to gastrectomy as the current surgical treatment for GC. Although a higher rate of major complications was observed in the extended lymphadenectomy group, this difference was not statistically significant in incidence between both groups of patients (OR = 1.92, CI95% = 0.75-4.91). Conclusions: Limited lymphadenectomy must be considered as the better recommendation for surgical treatment for GC in older adult patients, considering the oncological outcomes and lower rates of complications compared with more radical lymph node dissections.

Effects of Yipi Huayu decoction on tumor markers, immune function, and adverse reactions during chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effects of Yianpi Huayu Decoction on tumor markers, immune function and adverse reactions during chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

METHOD

The clinical data of 154 patients with progressive gastric cancer who attended Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Daijiawan Branch) from January 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an observation group (61 cases) and a control group (93 cases) according to the treatment method and were matched using propensity score matching (PSM). The control group was given SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen (oxaliplatin + tiglio), and the observation group was given spleen-strengthening and blood-stasis-reducing tonics as adjuvant treatment on the basis of the treatment given to the control group. Clinical efficacy in the two groups was observed, as well as Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) levels, immune function (IgA, IgM, and IgG), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and occurrence of adverse reactions.

RESULTS

After matching, there was no significant difference in the total clinical efficiency between the two groups (P > 0.05). After matching, there were no differences in CA19-9, CA72-4, and CEA levels between the observation group and the control group before or after treatment (P > 0.05). After matching, the IgA, IgM, and IgG levels in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). The incidence of leukopenia (P = 0.011) and diarrhea (P = 0.011) during treatment was higher in the control group than in the observation group after matching. The KPS score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group after matching (P < 0.05). After matching, Cox regression analysis found that the treatment regimen (P < 0.001, HR = 2.527), TNM staging (P = 0.001, HR = 0.471), local recurrence (P = 0.001, HR = 2.147), and pretreatment CEA (P = 0.011, HR = 1.131) were independent prognostic factors affecting patients' 2-year survival.

CONCLUSION

While the spleen-enhancing and blood-stasis-removing herbal formula combined with the SOX chemotherapy regimen did not improve therapeutic outcomes in gastric cancer patients, it did enhance immune function, reduce adverse reactions, and improve quality of life.

How to Balance Prognostic Factors in Controlled Phase II Trials: Stratified Permuted Block Randomization or Minimization? An Analysis of Clinical Trials in Digestive Oncology

In controlled phase II trials, major prognostic factors need to be well balanced between arms. The main procedures used are SPBR (Stratified Permuted Block Randomization) and minimization. First, we provide a systematic review of the treatment allocation procedure used in gastrointestinal oncology controlled phase II trials published in 2019. Second, we performed simulations using data from six phase II studies to measure the impacts of imbalances and bias on the efficacy estimations. From the 40 articles analyzed, all mentioned randomization in both the title and abstract, the median number of patients included was 109, and 77.5% were multicenter. Of the 27 studies that reported at least one stratification variable, 10 included the center as a stratification variable, 10 used minimization, 9 used SBR, and 8 were unspecified. In real data studies, the imbalance increased with the number of centers. The total and marginal imbalances were higher with SBR than with minimization, and the difference increased with the number of centers. The efficiency estimates per arm were close to the original trial estimate in both procedures. Minimization is often used in cases of numerous centers and guarantees better similarity between arms for stratification variables for total and marginal imbalances in phase II trials.

Optimal lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a narrative review

The management of gastric cancer has long been debated, particularly the extent of lymph node (LN) dissection required during curative surgery. LN invasion stands out as the most critical prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Historically, Japanese academic societies were the pioneers in defining a classification system for regional gastric LN stations, numbering them from 1 to 16. This classification was later used to differentiate between different types of LN dissection, such as D1, D2 and D3. However, these definitions were often considered too complex to be universally adopted, resulting in wide variations in recommendations from one country to another and making it difficult to compare published studies. In addition, the optimal extent of LN dissection remains uncertain, with initially recommended dissections being extensive but associated with significant morbidity without a clear survival benefit. The aim of this review is to make a case for extending LN dissection based on the existing literature, which includes a comprehensive examination of the current definitions of lymphadenectomy and an analysis of the results of all randomised controlled trials evaluating morbidity, mortality and long-term survival associated with different types of LN dissection. Finally, we provide a summary of the various recommendations issued by organizations such as the Japanese Gastric Research Association, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the French National Thesaurus of Digestive Oncology.

Normalization weighted combination scores re-evaluate TNM staging of gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter database

BACKGROUND

The pathological depth of tumor invasion (pT) and lymph node metastasis (pN) are critical independent prognostic factors for patients with gastric cancer (GC), representing effective methods for evaluating prognosis. In this study, the authors employed a normalization weight combination score to calculate the weight ratio of the pT stage and pN stage. Subsequently, the authors established a novel weighted TN (wTN) staging model based on these T and N weights, evaluating its prognostic capacity.

METHODS

This study utilized a training cohort from A Medical University Cancer Hospital and a validation cohort from the SEER database. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression were employed to screen clinical characteristics. Multivariate linear regression and cluster analysis calculated the weight ratio of T stage and N stage in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, followed by re-staging. Prognostic value was evaluated using C-index, likelihood ratio, Wald, and Score tests for wTN stage and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. A nomogram model was developed, and accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses.

RESULTS

LASSO was used for initial screening, selecting eight potential features for Cox analysis. Age, tumor size, metastasis lymph nodes (MLNs), and tumor location were confirmed as independent prognostic factors. wTN was calculated in the training and validation cohorts, and nomograms were established with the independent factors. N stage had a higher weight proportion than T stage in both cohorts (0.625/0.375 in training cohort, 0.556/0.444 in validation cohort). wTN outperformed the 8th TNM stage in C-index, likelihood ratio, Wald, and Score tests in the training cohort, with successful validation in the validation cohort. Stratified analysis of distinct pathological types further demonstrates that wTN staging exhibits superior prognostic performance.

CONCLUSION

The wTN staging model based on T stage and N stage weights has a good prognostic value for GC patients. The same conclusion was obtained in different pathological stratification.

Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions

Lymph nodes (LNs) are important hubs for metastatic cell arrest and growth, immune modulation, and secondary dissemination to distant sites through a series of mechanisms, and it has been proved that lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an essential prognostic indicator in many different types of cancer. Therefore, it is important for oncologists to understand the mechanisms of tumor cells to metastasize to LNs, as well as how LNM affects the prognosis and therapy of patients with cancer in order to provide patients with accurate disease assessment and effective treatment strategies. In recent years, with the updates in both basic and clinical studies on LNM and the application of advanced medical technologies, much progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanisms of LNM and the strategies for diagnosis and treatment of LNM. In this review, current knowledge of the anatomical and physiological characteristics of LNs, as well as the molecular mechanisms of LNM, are described. The clinical significance of LNM in different anatomical sites is summarized, including the roles of LNM playing in staging, prognostic prediction, and treatment selection for patients with various types of cancers. And the novel exploration and academic disputes of strategies for recognition, diagnosis, and therapeutic interventions of metastatic LNs are also discussed.

Efficacy of Lymph Node Location-Number Hybrid Staging System on the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis location and number significantly affects the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC). This study was designed to examine a new lymph node hybrid staging (hN) system to increase the predictive ability for patients with GC.

METHODS

This study analyzed the gastrointestinal treatment of GC at the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 2011 to December 2016, and selected 2598 patients from 2011 to 2015 as the training cohort (hN) and 756 patients from 2016 as the validation cohort (2016-hN). The study utilized the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), c-index, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to compare the prognostic performance of the hN with the 8th edition of AJCC pathological lymph node (pN) staging for GC patients.

RESULTS

The ROC verification of the training cohort and validation cohort based on each hN staging and pN staging showed that for each N staging, the hN staging had a training cohort with an AUC of 0.752 (0.733, 0.772) and a validation cohort with an AUC of 0.812 (0.780, 0.845). In the pN staging, the training cohort had an AUC of 0.728 (0.708, 0.749), and the validation cohort had an AUC of 0.784 (0.754, 0.824). c-Index and DCA also showed that hN staging had a higher prognostic ability than pN staging, which was confirmed in the training cohort and the verification cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node location-number hybrid staging can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with GC.

The Influence of Group No.8p Lymph Node Dissection on the Prognosis of Advanced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Controversy over whether No.8p lymph nodes (LNs) involvement is distant or regional metastasis remains, and the possible inclusion of No.8p LNs in D2 lymphadenectomy is unclear.

AIM

This work aimed to investigate the effect of No.8p LN dissection on the prognosis of patients with different LN metastases in advanced gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was used to collect 1149 cases of radical gastrectomy from July 2003 to April 2013. The patients were divided into the No.8a group (303 cases) and the No.8a + 8p group (846 cases) according to whether No.8p LN dissection was performed. The effect of No.8p LN dissection on the prognosis of patients with different total number of LN metastasis was analyzed.

RESULTS

Both No.8p positive and No.8p dissection were independent prognostic factors in patients with advanced GC. The 5-year overall survival rate (OS) of the positive No.8p group was 13.0%, and that of the negative No.8p group was 66.6%; the difference was significant (P < 0.05). In the group where the total number of LN metastasis was 3-15, the OS of patients with positive No.8p was significantly lower than that of the negative group (P < 0.05). The 5-year OS of the No.8a + 8p dissection group was 65.4%, and that of the No.8a dissection group was 55.5%; the difference was significant (P < 0.05). In the group where the total number of LN metastasis was 0-2, the No.8a + 8p dissection group had significantly higher OS than the No.8a dissection group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients with advanced GC, No.8p LN metastasis indicates a poor prognosis. LN dissection in the No.8a + 8p group may further improve the prognosis of some patients, especially when the total number of LN metastasis is 0-2.

Extended Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer in the Neoadjuvant Era: Current Status, Clinical Implications and Contentious Issues

Despite its decreasing incidence, gastric cancer remains an important global healthcare problem due to its overall high prevalence and high mortality rate. Since the MAGIC and FNLCC/FFCD trials, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been recommended throughout Europe in gastric cancer. Potential benefits of preoperative treatments include a higher rate of R0 resection achieved by downstaging the primary tumor, a likely effect on micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in the lymph nodes, and, as a result, improved cancer-related survival. Nevertheless, distortion of anatomical planes of dissection, interstitial fibrosis, and sclerotic tissue changes may increase surgical difficulty. The collection of at least twenty-five lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy would seem to ensure removal of undetectable node metastasis and reduce the likelihood of locoregional recurrence. It is not what you take but what you leave behind that defines survival. Therefore, para-aortic lymph node dissection is safe and effective after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in both therapeutic and prophylactic settings. In this review, the efficacy of adequate lymph node dissection, also in a neoadjuvant setting, has been investigated in the key studies conducted to date on the topic.

History of the lymph node numbering system in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma since 1962

The Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma was established by the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer in 1962. The latest 15th edition was published in 2017. One of its main features is that lymph nodes are numbered as stations. The number of groups has increased from 16 to 36 in 55 years. Seven groups (nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 10, and 15) were retained from the original classification. Nine groups (nos. 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 16) were sub-divided into two or more groups. Furthermore, seven groups (nos. 17, 18, 19, 20, 110, 111, and 112) were added in the 6th, 11th, and 12th editions. This numbering system helps surgeons recognize the exact lymph nodes that need to be dissected. However, the numbering system has become extremely complicated. It is necessary to organize the historical background of each lymph node station and share the definitions clearly. This review focuses on nine anatomical zones around the stomach and summarizes the history of lymph node stations in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Lymph node stations will continue to be modified in the future, and the historical background may be useful in future revisions.

Real-time fluorescence image-guided gastrointestinal oncologic surgery: Towards a new era

Technological improvements are crucial in the evolution of surgery. Real-time fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) has spread worldwide, mainly because of its usefulness during the intraoperative decision-making processes. The success of any gastrointestinal oncologic resection is based on the anatomical identification of the primary tumor and its regional lymph nodes. FGS allows also to evaluate the blood perfusion at the gastrointestinal stumps after colorectal or esophageal resections. Therefore, a reduction on the anastomotic leak rates has been postulated as one of the foreseeable benefits provided by the use of FGS in these procedures. Although the use of fluorescence in lymph node detection was initially described in breast cancer surgery, the technique is currently applied in gastric or splenic flexure cancers, as they both present complex and variable lymphatic drainages. FGS allows also to perform intraoperative lymphograms or sentinel lymph node biopsies. New applications of FGS are being developed to assist in the detection of peritoneal metastases or in the evaluation of the tumor resection margins. The present review aims to provide a general overview of the current status of real-time FGS in gastrointestinal oncologic surgery. We put a special focus on the different applications of FGS, discussing the main findings and limitations found in the contemporary literature and also the promising near future applications.

Prognostic significance of 14v-lymph node dissection to D2 dissection for lower-third gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node (LN) dissection is the standard surgical procedure for patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC). In the fifteenth edition of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma, the 14v LN (LNs along the root of the superior mesenteric vein) was defined as the regional gastric LN. The efficacy of 14v LN dissection during radical distal gastrectomy for lower-third GC remains controversial.

AIM

To analyze whether the addition of 14v LN dissection improved the survival of patients with lower-third GC.

METHODS

The data from 65 patients who underwent 14v LN dissection and 65 patients treated without 14v LN dissection were selected using the propensity score-matched method from our institute database constructed between 2000 and 2012. Overall survival was compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Overall survival was similar between patients with 14v LN metastasis and those with distant metastasis (P = 0.521). Among patients with pathological stage IIIA disease, those who were treated with 14v LN dissection had a significantly higher overall survival than those treated without it (P = 0.020). Multivariate analysis showed that age < 65 years and pT2-3 stage were independent favorable prognostic factors for prolonged overall survival in patients with pathological stage IIIA disease. Patients with No. 1, No. 6, No. 8a, or No. 11p LN metastasis were at higher risk of having 14v LN metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Adding 14v LN dissection to D2 dissection during radical distal gastrectomy may improve the overall survival of patients with pathological stage IIIA lower-third GC.

The survival analysis and oncogenic effects of CFP1 and 14-3-3 expression on gastric cancer

Background & aim

Gastric cancer (GC) is the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths. We established a prospective database of patients with GC who underwent surgical treatment. In this study, we explored the prognostic significance of the expression of CFP1 and 14-3-3 in gastric cancer, by studying the specimens collected from clinical subjects.

Materials & methods

Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of CFP1 and 14-3-3 in 84 GC subjects, including 73 patients who have undergone radical gastrectomy and 11 patients who have not undergone radical surgery. Survival analysis was performed by km-plot data.

Results

According to the survival analysis, we can see that the survival time of patients with high expression of CFP1 is lower than the patients with low expression in gastric cancer, while the effect of 14-3-3 is just the opposite. The survival time of patients with higher expression of 14-3-3 is also longer.

Conclusion

The CFP1 and 14-3-3 genes can be used as prognostic markers in patients with GC, but the study is still needed to confirm.