1
|
El-Jardali F, Bou-Karroum L, Hilal N, Hammoud M, Hemadi N, Assal M, Kalach N, Harb A, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Sy TR, Novillo-Ortiz D. Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:113. [PMID: 37907919 PMCID: PMC10619313 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01058-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge management (KM) emerged as a strategy to promote evidence-informed decision-making. This scoping review aims to map existing KM tools and mechanisms used to promote evidence-informed health decision-making in the WHO European Region and identify knowledge gaps. METHODS Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for conducting scoping reviews, we searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and Open Grey. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the general characteristics of the included papers and conducted narrative analysis of the included studies and categorized studies according to KM type and phase. RESULTS Out of 9541 citations identified, we included 141 studies. The KM tools mostly assessed are evidence networks, surveillance tools, observatories, data platforms and registries, with most examining KM tools in high-income countries of the WHO European region. Findings suggest that KM tools can identify health problems, inform health planning and resource allocation, increase the use of evidence by policymakers and stimulate policy discussion. CONCLUSION Policymakers and funding agencies are called to support capacity-building activities, and future studies to strengthen KM in the WHO European region particularly in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. An updated over-arching strategy to coordinate KM activities in the WHO European region will be useful in these efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadi El-Jardali
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- Knowledge to Policy Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lama Bou-Karroum
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- Knowledge to Policy Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nadeen Hilal
- Knowledge to Policy Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Maya Hammoud
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nour Hemadi
- Knowledge to Policy Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Michelle Assal
- Knowledge to Policy Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nour Kalach
- Knowledge to Policy Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Aya Harb
- Knowledge to Policy Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat
- Division of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tyrone Reden Sy
- Division of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - David Novillo-Ortiz
- Division of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Astbury CC, Lee KM, McGill E, Clarke J, Egan M, Halloran A, Malykh R, Rippin H, Wickramasinghe K, Penney TL. Systems Thinking and Complexity Science Methods and the Policy Process in Non-communicable Disease Prevention: A Systematic Scoping Review. Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:6772. [PMID: 37579437 PMCID: PMC10125079 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the complex determinants of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the dynamic policy landscape, researchers and policymakers are exploring the use of systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policies. The aim of this review is to systematically identify and analyse existing applications of STCS-informed methods in NCD prevention policy. METHODS Systematic scoping review: We searched academic databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE) for all publications indexed by 13 October 2020, screening titles, abstracts and full texts and extracting data according to published guidelines. We summarised key data from each study, mapping applications of methods informed by STCS to policy process domains. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify advantages, limitations, barriers and facilitators to using STCS. RESULTS 4681 papers were screened and 112 papers were included in this review. The most common policy areas were tobacco control, obesity prevention and physical activity promotion. Methods applied included system dynamics modelling, agent-based modelling and concept mapping. Advantages included supporting evidence-informed decision-making; modelling complex systems and addressing multi-sectoral problems. Limitations included the abstraction of reality by STCS methods, despite aims of encompassing greater complexity. Challenges included resource-intensiveness; lack of stakeholder trust in models; and results that were too complex to be comprehensible to stakeholders. Ensuring stakeholder ownership and presenting findings in a user-friendly way facilitated STCS use. CONCLUSION This review maps the proliferating applications of STCS methods in NCD prevention policy. STCS methods have the potential to generate tailored and dynamic evidence, adding robustness to evidence-informed policymaking, but must be accessible to policy stakeholders and have strong stakeholder ownership to build consensus and change stakeholder perspectives. Evaluations of whether, and under what circumstances, STCS methods lead to more effective policies compared to conventional methods are lacking, and would enable more targeted and constructive use of these methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Clifford Astbury
- Global Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kirsten M. Lee
- Global Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth McGill
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Janielle Clarke
- Global Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matt Egan
- Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Afton Halloran
- World Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation
- Department of Nutrition, ExercDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Regina Malykh
- World Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Holly Rippin
- World Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Kremlin Wickramasinghe
- World Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Tarra L. Penney
- Global Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Law RJ, Langley J, Hall B, Burton C, Hiscock J, Williams L, Morrison V, Lemmey AB, Lovell-Smith C, Gallanders J, Cooney J, Williams NH. Promoting physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions in primary care: the Function First realist synthesis with co-design. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
As people age and accumulate long-term conditions, their physical activity and physical function declines, resulting in disability and loss of independence. Primary care is well placed to empower individuals and communities to reduce this decline; however, the best approach is uncertain.
Objectives
To develop a programme theory to explain the mechanisms through which interventions improve physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions in different primary care contexts, and to co-design a prototype intervention.
Data sources
Systematic literature searches of relevant databases with forwards and backwards citation tracking, grey literature searches and further purposive searches were conducted. Qualitative data were collected through workshops and interviews.
Design
Realist evidence synthesis and co-design for primary care service innovation.
Setting
Primary care in Wales and England.
Participants
Stakeholders included people with long-term conditions, primary care professionals, people working in relevant community roles and researchers.
Methods
The realist evidence synthesis combined evidence from varied sources of literature with the views, experiences and ideas of stakeholders. The resulting context, mechanism and outcome statements informed three co-design workshops and a knowledge mobilisation workshop for primary care service innovation.
Results
Five context, mechanism and outcome statements were developed. (1) Improving physical activity and function is not prioritised in primary care (context). If the practice team culture is aligned to the elements of physical literacy (mechanism), then physical activity promotion will become routine and embedded in usual care (outcome). (2) Physical activity promotion is inconsistent and unco-ordinated (context). If specific resources are allocated to physical activity promotion (in combination with a supportive practice culture) (mechanism), then this will improve opportunities to change behaviour (outcome). (3) People with long-term conditions have varying levels of physical function and physical activity, varying attitudes to physical activity and differing access to local resources that enable physical activity (context). If physical activity promotion is adapted to individual needs, preferences and local resources (mechanism), then this will facilitate a sustained improvement in physical activity (outcome). (4) Many primary care practice staff lack the knowledge and confidence to promote physical activity (context). If staff develop an improved sense of capability through education and training (mechanism), then they will increase their engagement with physical activity promotion (outcome). (5) If a programme is credible with patients and professionals (context), then trust and confidence in the programme will develop (mechanism) and more patients and professionals will engage with the programme (outcome). A prototype multicomponent intervention was developed. This consisted of resources to nurture a culture of physical literacy, materials to develop the role of a credible professional who can promote physical activity using a directory of local opportunities and resources to assist with individual behaviour change.
Limitations
Realist synthesis and co-design is about what works in which contexts, so these resources and practice implications will need to be modified for different primary care contexts.
Conclusions
We developed a programme theory to explain how physical activity could be promoted in primary care in people with long-term conditions, which informed a prototype intervention.
Future work
A future research programme could further develop the prototype multicomponent intervention and assess its acceptability in practice alongside existing schemes before it is tested in a feasibility study to inform a future randomised controlled trial.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018103027.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Beth Hall
- Library and Archives Services, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Christopher Burton
- School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Julia Hiscock
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Lynne Williams
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Val Morrison
- School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Andrew B Lemmey
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | | | - Jennifer Cooney
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Nefyn H Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Law RJ, Langley J, Hall B, Burton C, Hiscock J, Williams L, Morrison V, Lemmey A, Lovell-Smith C, Gallanders J, Cooney JK, Williams N. 'Function First': how to promote physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions managed in primary care? A study combining realist and co-design methods. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046751. [PMID: 34315792 PMCID: PMC8317101 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a taxonomy of interventions and a programme theory explaining how interventions improve physical activity and function in people with long-term conditions managed in primary care. To co-design a prototype intervention informed by the programme theory. DESIGN Realist synthesis combining evidence from a wide range of rich and relevant literature with stakeholder views. Resulting context, mechanism and outcome statements informed co-design and knowledge mobilisation workshops with stakeholders to develop a primary care service innovation. RESULTS A taxonomy was produced, including 13 categories of physical activity interventions for people with long-term conditions. ABRIDGED REALIST PROGRAMME THEORY Routinely addressing physical activity within consultations is dependent on a reinforcing practice culture, and targeted resources, with better coordination, will generate more opportunities to address low physical activity. The adaptation of physical activity promotion to individual needs and preferences of people with long-term conditions helps affect positive patient behaviour change. Training can improve knowledge, confidence and capability of practice staff to better promote physical activity. Engagement in any physical activity promotion programme will depend on the degree to which it makes sense to patients and professions, and is seen as trustworthy. CO-DESIGN The programme theory informed the co-design of a prototype intervention to: improve physical literacy among practice staff; describe/develop the role of a physical activity advisor who can encourage the use of local opportunities to be more active; and provide materials to support behaviour change. CONCLUSIONS Previous physical activity interventions in primary care have had limited effect. This may be because they have only partially addressed factors emerging in our programme theory. The co-designed prototype intervention aims to address all elements of this emergent theory, but needs further development and consideration alongside current schemes and contexts (including implications relevant to COVID-19), and testing in a future study. The integration of realist and co-design methods strengthened this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca-Jane Law
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Beth Hall
- Library and Archives Services, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Christopher Burton
- School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Julia Hiscock
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Lynne Williams
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Val Morrison
- School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Andrew Lemmey
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | | | | | - Nefyn Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Racine AN, Garbarino JM, Massiera B, Vuillemin A. Analysis of the Local Health-Enhancing Physical Activity Policies on the French Riviera. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 18:E156. [PMID: 33379354 PMCID: PMC7796244 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Policy is a lever for initiating the structural and environmental changes that foster health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) promotion. However, little is known about the evidence in support of local governments regarding their HEPA-promoting policies. The aim of this study was to collect comprehensive information on municipal HEPA policies on the French Riviera (Alpes-Maritimes and Var counties) to provide an overview of the development of these policies in this territory. Mid-sized cities from the two counties constituting the French Riviera were targeted (n = 17). In each city, a local tool for HEPA policy analysis, CAPLA-Santé, was used to gain information from key informants heading the departments of sports, health services, and social services. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Ten mid-sized cities volunteered to participate. Key informants from the sports (n = 10), health services (n = 5), and social services (n = 6) departments were interviewed. Written HEPA policy documents were formalized in six cities. These documents (n = 14) were mainly from the sports (n = 8) and health services (n = 4) sectors. The key informants reported that support from national policy, the commitment of elected officials, and large local stakeholder networks facilitated HEPA promotion, whereas the lack of intersectoral collaboration and limited resources were limitations. The results provide insight into the development of municipal HEPA policies, highlighting some of the barriers, facilitators, and perspectives. These findings could be valuable to scale up HEPA promotion at the local level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Anne Vuillemin
- Graduate School of Health Science Ecosystems, Université Côte d’Azur, Lamhess, 06200 Nice, France; (A.N.R.); (J.-M.G.); (B.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dritsakis G, Trenkova L, Śliwińska-Kowalska M, Brdarić D, Pontoppidan NH, Katrakazas P, Bamiou DE. Public health policy-making for hearing loss: stakeholders' evaluation of a novel eHealth tool. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:125. [PMID: 33121491 PMCID: PMC7596974 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00637-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hearing loss (HL) affects 466 million people of all ages worldwide, with a rapidly increasing prevalence, and therefore requires appropriate public health policies. Multi-disciplinary approaches that make use of eHealth services can build the evidence to influence public policy. The European Union-funded project EVOTION developed a platform that is fed with real-time data from hearing aids, a smartphone, and additional clinical data and makes public health policy recommendations based on hypothetical public health policy-making models, a big data engine and decision support system. The present study aimed to evaluate this platform as a new tool to support policy-making for HL. Methods A total of 23 key stakeholders in the United Kingdom, Croatia, Bulgaria and Poland evaluated the platform according to the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats methodology. Results There was consensus that the platform, with its advanced technology as well as the amount and variety of data that it can collect, has huge potential to inform commissioning decisions, public health regulations and affect healthcare as a whole. To achieve this, several limitations and external risks need to be addressed and mitigated. Differences between countries highlighted that the EVOTION tool should be used and managed according to local constraints to maximise success. Conclusion Overall, the EVOTION platform can equip HL policy-makers with a novel data-driven tool that can support public health policy-making for HL in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dario Brdarić
- Institute of Public Health for the Osijek-Baranja County, Osijek, Croatia.,University of Osijek, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Osijek, Croatia
| | | | - Panagiotis Katrakazas
- Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, Athens, Greece
| | - Doris-Eva Bamiou
- University College London, Ear Institute, London, United Kingdom. .,Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Law RJ, Williams L, Langley J, Burton C, Hall B, Hiscock J, Morrison V, Lemmey A, Partridge R, Lovell-Smith C, Gallanders J, Williams N. 'Function First-Be Active, Stay Independent'-promoting physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions by primary care: a protocol for a realist synthesis with embedded co-production and co-design. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035686. [PMID: 32041865 PMCID: PMC7045082 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with long-term conditions typically have reduced physical functioning, are less physically active and therefore become less able to live independently and do the things they enjoy. However, assessment and promotion of physical function and physical activity is not part of routine management in primary care. This project aims to develop evidence-based recommendations about how primary care can best help people to become more physically active in order to maintain and improve their physical function, thus promoting independence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study takes a realist synthesis approach, following RAMESES guidance, with embedded co-production and co-design. Stage 1 will develop initial programme theories about physical activity and physical function for people with long-term conditions, based on a review of the scientific and grey literature, and two multisector stakeholder workshops using LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®. Stage 2 will involve focused literature searching, data extraction and synthesis to provide evidence to support or refute the initial programme theories. Searches for evidence will focus on physical activity interventions involving the assessment of physical function which are relevant to primary care. We will describe 'what works', 'for whom' and 'in what circumstances' and develop conjectured programme theories using context, mechanism and outcome configurations. Stage 3 will test and refine these theories through individual stakeholder interviews. The resulting theory-driven recommendations will feed into Stage 4 which will involve three sequential co-design stakeholder workshops in which practical ideas for service innovation in primary care will be developed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Healthcare and Medical Sciences Academic Ethics Committee (Reference 2018-16308) and NHS Wales Research Ethics Committee 5 approval (References 256 729 and 262726) have been obtained. A knowledge mobilisation event will address issues relevant to wider implementation of the intervention and study findings. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and formal and informal reports. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018103027.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca-Jane Law
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK
| | - Lynne Williams
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Joseph Langley
- Lab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Christopher Burton
- School of Allied Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Beth Hall
- Library and Archives Service, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Julia Hiscock
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK
| | - Val Morrison
- School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Andrew Lemmey
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Rebecca Partridge
- Lab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | | | | | - Nefyn Williams
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kennedy C, O’Reilly P, O’Connell R, O’Leary D, Fealy G, Hegarty J, Brady A, Nicholson E, McNamara M, Casey M. Integrative review; identifying the evidence base for policymaking and analysis in health care. J Adv Nurs 2019; 75:3231-3245. [DOI: 10.1111/jan.14121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona Kennedy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery Robert Gordon University Aberdeen Scotland
| | - Pauline O’Reilly
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery University of Limerick Limerick Ireland
| | - Rhona O’Connell
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery University College Cork Cork Ireland
| | - Denise O’Leary
- School of Hospitality Management and Tourism Dublin Institute of Technology Dublin Ireland
| | - Gerard Fealy
- UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
| | | | - Anne‐Marie Brady
- School of Nursing & Midwifery Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
| | - Emma Nicholson
- UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
| | - Martin McNamara
- UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
| | - Mary Casey
- UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tudisca V, Valente A, Castellani T, Stahl T, Sandu P, Dulf D, Spitters H, Van de Goor I, Radl-Karimi C, Syed MA, Loncarevic N, Lau CJ, Roelofs S, Bertram M, Edwards N, Aro AR. Development of measurable indicators to enhance public health evidence-informed policy-making. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:47. [PMID: 29855328 PMCID: PMC5984390 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0323-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ensuring health policies are informed by evidence still remains a challenge despite efforts devoted to this aim. Several tools and approaches aimed at fostering evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM) have been developed, yet there is a lack of availability of indicators specifically devoted to assess and support EIPM. The present study aims to overcome this by building a set of measurable indicators for EIPM intended to infer if and to what extent health-related policies are, or are expected to be, evidence-informed for the purposes of policy planning as well as formative and summative evaluations. METHODS The indicators for EIPM were developed and validated at international level by means of a two-round internet-based Delphi study conducted within the European project 'REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity' (REPOPA). A total of 82 researchers and policy-makers from the six European countries (Denmark, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Romania, the United Kingdom) involved in the project and international organisations were asked to evaluate the relevance and feasibility of an initial set of 23 indicators developed by REPOPA researchers on the basis of literature and knowledge gathered from the previous phases of the project, and to propose new indicators. RESULTS The first Delphi round led to the validation of 14 initial indicators and to the development of 8 additional indicators based on panellists' suggestions; the second round led to the validation of a further 11 indicators, including 6 proposed by panellists, and to the rejection of 6 indicators. A total of 25 indicators were validated, covering EIPM issues related to human resources, documentation, participation and monitoring, and stressing different levels of knowledge exchange and involvement of researchers and other stakeholders in policy development and evaluation. CONCLUSION The study overcame the lack of availability of indicators to assess if and to what extent policies are realised in an evidence-informed manner thanks to the active contribution of researchers and policy-makers. These indicators are intended to become a shared resource usable by policy-makers, researchers and other stakeholders, with a crucial impact on fostering the development of policies informed by evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Timo Stahl
- The National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Tampere, Finland
| | - Petru Sandu
- Babeș-Bolyai University (BBU), Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Diana Dulf
- Babeș-Bolyai University (BBU), Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | | | - Christina Radl-Karimi
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Natasa Loncarevic
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
| | - Cathrine Juel Lau
- Center for Clinical Research and Disease Prevention, previously called Research Centre for Prevention and Health (RCPH), Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Maja Bertram
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Arja R. Aro
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Spitters HPEM, van de Goor LAM, Lau CJ, Sandu P, Eklund Karlsson L, Jansen J, van Oers JAM. Learning from games: stakeholders' experiences involved in local health policy. J Public Health (Oxf) 2018. [PMID: 29538724 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Since public health problems are complex and the related policies need to address a wide range of sectors, cross-sectoral collaboration is beneficial. One intervention focusing on stimulating collaboration is a 'policy game'. The focus on specific problems facilitates relationships between the stakeholders and stimulates cross-sectoral policymaking. The present study explores stakeholders' learning experiences with respect to the collaboration process in public health policymaking. This was achieved via their game participation, carried out in real-life stakeholder networks in the Netherlands, Denmark and Romania. The policy game (In2Action) was developed and implemented as a 1-day role-play. The data consisted of: (i) observations and evaluation notes during the game and (ii) participant questionnaire after the game. All three countries showed similar results in learning experience during the collaboration processes in local policymaking. Specific learning experiences were related to: (i) the stakeholder network, (ii) interaction and (iii) relationships. The game also increased participant's understanding of group dynamics and need for a coordinator in policymaking. This exploratory study shows that the game provides participants with learning experiences during the collaboration process in policymaking. Experiencing what is needed to establish cross-sectoral collaboration is a first step towards enhancing knowledge exchange and more effective public health policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H P E M Spitters
- Department of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - L A M van de Goor
- Department of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - C Juel Lau
- Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Capital Region of Denmark, Ndr. Ringvej 57, Building 84/85, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
| | - P Sandu
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, University Babes-Bolyai, 7 Pandurilor St. Universitas, Room 910, 400376 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - L Eklund Karlsson
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohr Vej 9, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - J Jansen
- Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement (CBO), Churchilllaan 11, 3527 GV Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J A M van Oers
- Department of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands.,National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Spitters HPEM, van Oers JAM, Sandu P, Lau CJ, Quanjel M, Dulf D, Chereches R, van de Goor LAM. Developing a policy game intervention to enhance collaboration in public health policymaking in three European countries. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:961. [PMID: 29258483 PMCID: PMC5735538 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4963-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- H P E M Spitters
- Department of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| | - J A M van Oers
- Department of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720, BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - P Sandu
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, University Babes-Bolyai, 7 Pandurilor St. Universitas, Room 910, Zip code 400376, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - C J Lau
- Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Centre of Health, The Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, Ndr. Ringvej 57, Building 84/85, -2600, Glostrup, DK, Denmark
| | - M Quanjel
- Entrea, Youth Care, Special Needs Education and Research, P.O. Box 6546, 6503, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - D Dulf
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, University Babes-Bolyai, 7 Pandurilor St. Universitas, Room 910, Zip code 400376, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - R Chereches
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, University Babes-Bolyai, 7 Pandurilor St. Universitas, Room 910, Zip code 400376, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - L A M van de Goor
- Department of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|