1
|
Paier-Abuzahra M, Posch N, Spary-Kainz U, Radl-Karimi C, Semlitsch T, Jeitler K, Siebenhofer A. Effects of task shifting from primary care physicians to nurses: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078414. [PMID: 38458792 PMCID: PMC10928766 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Task-shifting from primary care physicians (PCPs) to nurses is one option to better and more efficiently meet the needs of the population in primary care and to overcome PCP shortages. This protocol outlines an overview of systematic reviews to assess the effects of delegation or substitution by nurses of PCPs' activities regarding clinical, patient-relevant, professional and health services-related outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a systematic literature search for secondary literature in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and Health Technology Assessments in German and English comprising randomised controlled trials and prospective controlled trials will be considered for inclusion. Search terms will include Medical Subject Headings combined with free text words. At least one-third of abstracts and full-text articles are reviewed by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. We will only consider reviews if they include controlled trials, if the profession that substituted or delegated tasks was a nurse, if the profession of the control was a PCP, if the assessed intervention was the same in the intervention and control group and if the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire score is ≥5. The corrected covered area will be calculated to describe the degree of overlap of studies in the reviews included in the study. We will report the overview according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The overview of secondary literature does not require the approval of an Ethics Committee and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020183327.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muna Paier-Abuzahra
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nicole Posch
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ulrike Spary-Kainz
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christina Radl-Karimi
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thomas Semlitsch
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Klaus Jeitler
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Steiermark, Austria
| | - Andrea Siebenhofer
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Institute for General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Radl-Karimi C, Nielsen DS, Sodemann M, Batalden P, von Plessen C. "When I feel safe, I dare to open up": immigrant and refugee patients' experiences with coproducing healthcare. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:2338-2345. [PMID: 34823924 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Interest in the coproduction concept in healthcare is increasing. According to coproduction, services are, unlike goods, always coproduced by a user and a service provider. This study explored how immigrants and refugees perceive the coproduction of their healthcare service in clinical encounters. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with thirteen patients with varied backgrounds and health problems. Participants were purposefully recruited in an interdisciplinary clinic for immigrants and refugees at a Danish University Hospital. Interviews were transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed using meaning condensation. RESULTS Patients emphasized the importance of a safe space where they could be themselves and feel supported. This encouraged them to be open and assume an active role in the coproduction of their health. A stable therapeutic alliance based on kindness and kinship helped them find strength and take responsibility for their own health. CONCLUSIONS This study improves our understanding of how immigrants and refugees experience the coproduction of healthcare services. Further studies, evaluating long-term outcomes of coproduction efforts, are required. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Providing a safe space in which health professionals have time to listen and empathically validate immigrant and refugee patients' lived realities, can enable patients to open up and become agents of their own health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Radl-Karimi
- OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Dorthe Susanne Nielsen
- Migrant Health Clinic, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Center for Global Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Morten Sodemann
- Migrant Health Clinic, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Center for Global Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Paul Batalden
- The Dartmouth Institute, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA.
| | - Christian von Plessen
- Direction générale de la santé, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Radl-Karimi C, Nielsen DS, Sodemann M, Batalden P, Von Plessen C. “What it really takes” – a qualitative study of how professionals coproduce healthcare service with immigrant patients. J Migr Health 2022; 5:100101. [PMID: 35480876 PMCID: PMC9036136 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
4
|
Radl-Karimi C, Nicolaisen A, Sodemann M, Batalden P, von Plessen C. Under what circumstances can immigrant patients and healthcare professionals co-produce health? - an interpretive scoping review. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2020; 15:1838052. [PMID: 33112713 PMCID: PMC7599002 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1838052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Radl-Karimi
- OPEN Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Anne Nicolaisen
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Morten Sodemann
- Migrant Health Clinic, Odense Universitetshospital, Odense C, Denmark
- Center for Global Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Paul Batalden
- The Dartmouth Institute, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Christian von Plessen
- Direction générale de la santé, Unisanté, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tudisca V, Valente A, Castellani T, Stahl T, Sandu P, Dulf D, Spitters H, Van de Goor I, Radl-Karimi C, Syed MA, Loncarevic N, Lau CJ, Roelofs S, Bertram M, Edwards N, Aro AR. Development of measurable indicators to enhance public health evidence-informed policy-making. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:47. [PMID: 29855328 PMCID: PMC5984390 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0323-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ensuring health policies are informed by evidence still remains a challenge despite efforts devoted to this aim. Several tools and approaches aimed at fostering evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM) have been developed, yet there is a lack of availability of indicators specifically devoted to assess and support EIPM. The present study aims to overcome this by building a set of measurable indicators for EIPM intended to infer if and to what extent health-related policies are, or are expected to be, evidence-informed for the purposes of policy planning as well as formative and summative evaluations. METHODS The indicators for EIPM were developed and validated at international level by means of a two-round internet-based Delphi study conducted within the European project 'REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity' (REPOPA). A total of 82 researchers and policy-makers from the six European countries (Denmark, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Romania, the United Kingdom) involved in the project and international organisations were asked to evaluate the relevance and feasibility of an initial set of 23 indicators developed by REPOPA researchers on the basis of literature and knowledge gathered from the previous phases of the project, and to propose new indicators. RESULTS The first Delphi round led to the validation of 14 initial indicators and to the development of 8 additional indicators based on panellists' suggestions; the second round led to the validation of a further 11 indicators, including 6 proposed by panellists, and to the rejection of 6 indicators. A total of 25 indicators were validated, covering EIPM issues related to human resources, documentation, participation and monitoring, and stressing different levels of knowledge exchange and involvement of researchers and other stakeholders in policy development and evaluation. CONCLUSION The study overcame the lack of availability of indicators to assess if and to what extent policies are realised in an evidence-informed manner thanks to the active contribution of researchers and policy-makers. These indicators are intended to become a shared resource usable by policy-makers, researchers and other stakeholders, with a crucial impact on fostering the development of policies informed by evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Timo Stahl
- The National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Tampere, Finland
| | - Petru Sandu
- Babeș-Bolyai University (BBU), Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Diana Dulf
- Babeș-Bolyai University (BBU), Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | | | - Christina Radl-Karimi
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Natasa Loncarevic
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
| | - Cathrine Juel Lau
- Center for Clinical Research and Disease Prevention, previously called Research Centre for Prevention and Health (RCPH), Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Maja Bertram
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Arja R. Aro
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bertram M, Loncarevic N, Radl-Karimi C, Thøgersen M, Skovgaard T, Aro AR. Contextually tailored interventions can increase evidence-informed policy-making on health-enhancing physical activity: the experiences of two Danish municipalities. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:14. [PMID: 29466998 PMCID: PMC5822477 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0290-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aims to test out contextually tailored interventions to increase evidence-informed health-enhancing physical activity policy-making in two Danish municipalities. METHODS The study was performed as experiments in natural settings. Based on results from a pre-intervention study defining the needs and contexts of the two settings, the interventions were developed based on logical models. The interventions aimed at increasing the use of knowledge in policy-making, primarily via strengthening intersectoral collaboration. The interventions were evaluated via pre-, post- and 12-month follow-up questionnaires and qualitative interviews were carried out prior to the intervention start. RESULTS The use of knowledge changed in several ways. In one municipality, the use of stakeholder and target group knowledge increased whereas, in the other municipality, the use of research knowledge increased. In both municipalities, the ability to translate knowledge to local context, the political request and the organisational procedures for use of knowledge increased during the interventions. There was some variation between the two settings, which shows the importance of tailoring to context. Most of the changes were diminished at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION Contextually tailored interventions have the potential to increase evidence-informed policy-making on health-enhancing physical activity. However, this finding needs to be tested in larger samples and its sustainability must be strengthened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Bertram
- Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Unit for Health Promotion Research, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark.
| | - Natasa Loncarevic
- Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Unit for Health Promotion Research, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Christina Radl-Karimi
- Region of Southern Denmark, Center for Quality, P V Tuxens Vej 5, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Malene Thøgersen
- Danish Institute for Non-Formal Education/Danish Institute for Sport Studies, Frederiksgade 78B, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Thomas Skovgaard
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Arja R Aro
- Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Unit for Health Promotion Research, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immigrant patients often meet barriers to patient-centred healthcare in their new host countries. Given the heterogeneity of patients from ethnic minorities, established strategies for patient centredness might not work in their case. The concept of coproduction provides a new perspective on how to collaboratively create the highest possible value for both the patient and the healthcare system. The concept acknowledges that all service is coproduced and directs attention to the relationship between patient and care provider. Coproduction is still a new concept in healthcare and its use with vulnerable groups of patients requires further study. This protocol outlines a scoping review to be conducted on the current knowledge on coproduction of service by immigrants and their service providers in the healthcare sector. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will use Joanna Briggs methodology for scoping reviews. The data will stem from the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Ovid EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, EBSCO PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. We will also screen the websites of national authorities and research organisations for publications and review the literature lists of the identified articles for relevant references. We will include all types of literature on coproduction of healthcare or social service by immigrants and service providers, including their relationship with one another, communication and collaboration. Two reviewers will independently screen eligible publications and extract data using a checklist developed for this scoping review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The results of the study will provide an innovative perspective on the coproduction of value in healthcare service by immigrant patients and care providers. We will present the results at national and international conferences, seminars and other events with relevant stakeholders and immigrant patients, and publish them in a peer-reviewed journal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Nicolaisen
- Centre for Quality, Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Morten Sodemann
- Migrant Health Clinic, Department of Infectious Diseases Q, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Paul Batalden
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aro AR, Tudisca V, Radl-Karimi C, Lau CJ, Bertram M, Syed AM, Skovgaard T, Cori L, Bianchi F, Valente A. Contextualization of indicators for evidence-informed policy making: results from Denmark and Italy. Eur J Public Health 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw167.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
9
|
Tudisca V, Radl-Karimi C, Lau CL, Syed AM, Aro AR, Valente A. Indicators for evidence-informed policy making and policy phases in the Italian and Danish context. Eur J Public Health 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw174.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
10
|
Loncarevic N, Bertram M, Gulis G, Radl-Karimi C, Aro AR. Stewardship approach in comparing cross-country policy intervention results challenges and options. Eur J Public Health 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw174.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Loncarevic N, Radl-Karimi C, Bertram M, Gulis G, Thøgersen M, Skovgaard T, Aro AR. Politicians learned to request more research knowledge - intervention results from Denmark. Eur J Public Health 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv173.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|