Claudin-18.2 mediated interaction of gastric Cancer cells and Cancer-associated fibroblasts drives tumor progression

Claudin18.2-positive gastric cancer-specific changes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy-driven immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment

BACKGROUND

Claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) is a potential therapeutic target in gastric cancer (GC). However, combining chemotherapy with anti-CLDN18.2 antibodies has shown limited efficacy in CLDN18.2-positive GC, and chemotherapy-induced changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) remain unclear.

METHODS

This study analyzed 37 GC samples, including 11 CLDN18.2-positive cases, using single-cell RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence to assess chemotherapy-driven TME changes in CLDN18.2-positive GC.

RESULTS

In chemotherapy-treated CLDN18.2-positive GC, cytotoxic natural killer (NK) cells displayed antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC)-related genes at lower levels than in untreated CLDN18.2-positive GC, while regulatory T cells (Tregs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) showed TGFB1 expression at higher levels. Additionally, NK cells, Tregs, and TAMs were more abundant in chemotherapy-treated than untreated CLDN18.2-positive GC. These chemotherapy-induced changes were absent in CLDN18.2-negative GC. Cell-cell interaction analysis identified unique interactions in chemotherapy-treated CLDN18.2-positive GC, including CCL5-CCR5 signaling between cytotoxic NK cells (Sender) and effector Tregs (Receptor) and TGFB1-TGFBR signaling between effector Tregs (Sender) and TAMs (Receptor). Cytotoxic NK cells expressed CCL5 at higher levels, CCR5-positive Tregs were more prevalent, and TAMs exhibited higher TGF-β receptor signature scores in chemotherapy-treated than untreated CLDN18.2-positive GC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that chemotherapy can drive immunosuppressive TME modifications specific to CLDN18.2-positive GC.

Advances and challenges in gastric cancer testing: the role of biomarkers

Advances in the identification of molecular biomarkers and the development of targeted therapies have enhanced the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Several established biomarkers have been widely integrated into routine clinical diagnostics of gastric cancer to guide personalized treatment. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was the first molecular biomarker to be used in gastric cancer with trastuzumab being the first approved targeted therapy for HER2-positive gastric cancer. Programmed death-ligand 1 positivity and microsatellite instability can guide the use of immunotherapies, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab. More recently, zolbetuximab has been approved for patients with claudin 18.2-positive diseases in some countries. More targeted therapies, including savolitinib for MET-positive patients, are currently under clinical investigation. However, the clinical application of these diagnostic approaches could be hampered by many existing challenges, including invasive and costly sampling methods, variability in immunohistochemistry interpretation, high costs and long turnaround times for next-generation sequencing, the absence of standardized and clinically validated diagnostic cut-off values for some biomarkers, and tumor heterogeneity. Novel testing and analysis techniques, such as artificial intelligence-assisted image analysis and multiplex immunohistochemistry, and emerging therapeutic strategies, including combination therapies that integrate immune checkpoint inhibitors with targeted therapies, offer potential solutions to some of these challenges. This article reviews recent progress in gastric cancer testing, outlines current challenges, and explores future directions for biomarker testing and targeted therapy for gastric cancer.

Emerging targets in gastric and pancreatic cancer: Focus on claudin 18.2

Recently, the molecular landscape of gastric and pancreatic cancers has advanced with Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) emerging as a promising therapeutic target. Claudin 18.2, a tight junction protein, is selectively expressed in cancer cells and minimally in normal tissues, making it an attractive candidate for targeted therapy. Therapies like monoclonal antibodies (e.g., zolbetuximab), bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates have shown significant potential in improving clinical outcomes. Early-phase clinical trials demonstrate robust antitumor activity, particularly in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy regimens. However, challenges such as patient selection, resistance mechanisms, and toxicity management remain critical. This review highlights the therapeutic landscape, clinical advancements, and future directions of targeting Claudin 18.2 in gastric and pancreatic cancer treatment.

The role of CLDN18.2 in gastric cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major global cause of cancer mortality, with a median overall survival of just 12 months. CLDN18.2, a specific isoform of Claudin18 normally expressed in the gastric mucosa, has emerged as a potential therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker due to its exposure on the surface of tumor cells following malignant transformation. This exposure allows CLDN18.2's extracellular loops to bind monoclonal antibodies, presenting new opportunities for targeted therapy and improved prognostic assessment.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted for studies that addressed the correlation of CLDN18.2 with: (1) Progression-free survival (PFS) and (2) Overall Survival (OS). Hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics. P values of ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio, version 4.2.3.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies encompassing a total of 4,085 patients were included. There were 2,691 (65.8%) male and 1,394 (34.2%) female patients. In the histologic GC analysis, there were 1,582 (38.7%) patients that had intestinal type and 1,280 (31.3%) with diffuse type. Patients with CLDN18.2 negative status exhibited a non-significant trend towards prolonged PFS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.98-1.61; p = 0.07; I2 = 18%) and a significant prolonged OS (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.07-1.34; p < 0.01; I2 = 37%) when compared to CLDN18.2-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings establish CLDN18.2 as a robust negative prognostic indicator for overall survival in GC patients. While its impact on PFS was not statistically significant, the association with OS suggests CLDN18.2 may serve as a marker for complex biological processes underlying tumor advancement.

Expression and Targeted Application of Claudins Family in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases

Hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases are becoming increasingly common worldwide and associated cancers are prone to recurrence and metastasis. For a more accurate treatment, new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. The claudins (CLDN) family comprises a class of membrane proteins that are the main components of tight junctions, and are essential for forming intercellular barriers and maintaining cellular polarity. In mammals, the claudin family contains at least 27 transmembrane proteins and plays a major role in mediating cell adhesion and paracellular permeability. Multiple claudin proteins are altered in various cancers, including gastric cancer (GC), esophageal cancer (EC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pancreatic cancer (PC), colorectal cancer (CRC) and breast cancer (BC). An increasing number of studies have shown that claudins are closely associated with the occurrence and development of hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases. Interestingly, claudin proteins exhibit different effects on cancer progression in different tumor tissues, including tumor suppression and promotion. In addition, various claudin proteins are currently being studied as potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets, including claudin-3, claudin-4, claudin-18.2, etc. In this article, the functional phenotype, molecular mechanism, and targeted application of the claudin family in hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases are reviewed, with an emphasis on claudin-1, claudin-4, claudin-7 and claudin-18.2, and the current situation and future prospects are proposed.

Signaling, cancer cell plasticity, and intratumor heterogeneity

Cancer's complexity is in part due to the presence of intratumor heterogeneity and the dynamic nature of cancer cell plasticity, which create substantial obstacles in effective cancer management. Variability within a tumor arises from the existence of diverse populations of cancer cells, impacting the progression, spread, and resistance to treatments. At the core of this variability is the concept of cellular plasticity - the intrinsic ability of cancer cells to alter their molecular and cellular identity in reaction to environmental and genetic changes. This adaptability is a cornerstone of cancer's persistence and progression, making it a formidable target for treatments. Emerging studies have emphasized the critical role of such plasticity in fostering tumor diversity, which in turn influences the course of the disease and the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies. The transformative nature of cancer involves a network of signal transduction pathways, notably those that drive the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metabolic remodeling, shaping the evolutionary path of cancer cells. Despite advancements, our understanding of the precise molecular machinations and signaling networks driving these changes is still evolving, underscoring the necessity for further research. This editorial presents a series entitled "Signaling Cancer Cell Plasticity and Intratumor Heterogeneity" in Cell Communication and Signaling, dedicated to unraveling these complex processes and proposing new avenues for therapeutic intervention.

Claudins in Cancer: A Current and Future Therapeutic Target

Claudins are a family of 27 proteins that have an important role in the formation of tight junctions. They also have an important function in ion exchange, cell mobility, and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, the latter being very important in cancer invasion and metastasis. Therapeutic targeting of claudins has been investigated to improve cancer outcomes. Recent evidence shows improved outcomes when combining monoclonal antibodies against claudin 18.2 with chemotherapy for patients with gastroesophageal junction cancer. Currently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells targeting claudin 18 are under investigation. In this review, we will discuss the major functions of claudins, their distribution in the normal as well as cancerous tissues, and their effect in cancer metastasis, with a special focus on the therapeutic targeting of claudins to improve cancer outcomes.

Influential upregulation of KCNE4: Propelling cancer associated fibroblasts-driven colorectal cancer progression

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignancy of remarkable heterogeneity and heightened morbidity. Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are abundant in CRC tissues and are essential for CRC growth. Here, we aimed to develop a CAF-related classifier for predicting the prognosis of CRC and identify critical pro-tumorigenic genes in CAFs.

METHOD

The mRNA expression and clinical information of CRC samples were sourced from two comprehensive databases, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Using a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) approach, CAF-related genes were identified and a CAF risk signature was developed through the application of univariate analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model. EdU cell proliferation assay, and transwell assay were performed to detect the oncogenic role of KCNE4 in CAFs.

RESULTS

We constructed a prognostic CAF model consisting of two genes (SFRP2 and KCNE4). CRC patients were classified into low- and high-CAF-risk groups using the median CAF risk score, and patients in the high-CAF-risk group had worse prognosis. Meanwhile, a higher risk score for CAFs was associated with greater stromal and CAF infiltrations, as well as higher expression of CAF markers. Furthermore, TIDE analysis indicated that patients with a high CAF risk score are less responsive to immunotherapy. Our further experiments had confirmed the strong correlation between KCNE4 and the malignant phenotypes of CAFs. Moreover, we had shown that KCNE4 could actively promote tumor-promoting phenotypes in CAFs, indicating its critical role in cancer progression.

CONCLUSION

The two-gene prognostic CAF signature was constructed and could be reliable for predicting prognosis for CRC patients. Moreover, KCNE4 may be a promising strategy for the development of novel anti-cancer therapeutics specifically directed against CAFs.