Feasibility study of dual parametric 2D histogram analysis of breast lesions with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI

Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: Differentiation Using Microstructural Metrics Derived from Time-Dependent Diffusion MRI

Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of microstructural metrics from time-dependent diffusion MRI (Td-dMRI) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods This prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05373628) enrolled participants with breast lesions confirmed with US, mammography, or both from January 2022 to June 2023. Participants underwent oscillating and pulsed gradient encoded Td-dMRI and conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Td-dMRI data were fitted using the imaging microstructural parameters using limited spectrally edited diffusion model. Lesions were classified as benign or malignant based on pathology. Diagnostic performances of Td-dMRI metrics and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) from DWI in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors were assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and compared using the DeLong test. Results The study included 102 female participants (mean age: 48 years ± 12 [SD]) with 105 breast lesions (three participants had two lesions), including 31 benign and 74 malignant lesions. The cell diameter, cell density, and intracellular volume fraction from Td-dMRI were higher and the ADC was lower in malignant lesions compared with benign lesions (P < .001 to P = .001). Among microstructural metrics from Td-dMRI, the cell density had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which was higher than that of the ADC (0.93 [95% CI: 0.88, 0.98] vs 0.79 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.88], P = .03). Conclusion A single microstructural metric derived from Td-dMRI, cell density, had higher performance than conventional ADC in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions. Keywords: MR-Diffusion Weighted Imaging, Breast Clinical trial registration no. NCT05373628 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.

DWI in the Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions Presenting with Non-Mass Enhancement on CE-MRI

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps values of breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement (NME) on MRI could predict benign or malignant pathohistological findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 136 female patients with NME and corresponding ultrasound correlate and a subsequent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. The patients were subdivided into benign or malignant subgroups based on pathology reports, which served as the gold standard. Blinded to the pathological results, two radiologists independently measured the ADC values of the depicted NME using punctate, 10 mm and whole tumor regions of interest (ROIs) wherever applicable. The mean of all measurements was also analyzed and compared with the pathologic subdivision.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of whole tumor ROI in detecting benign NME is 91% compared to 74% for 10 mm ROI and 78% for punctate ROI. No significant differences in ADC values were observed when comparing fatty breast tissue and dense breast tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences in ADC values between benign and malignant findings using all types of measurements, where the whole tumor ROI was the most sensitive.

The value of multimodality MR in T staging evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the preferred treatment for rectal cancer, but surgical treatment alone sometimes does not achieve satisfactory results.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of multimodal Magnetic Resonance (MR) images in evaluating T staging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and to compare and analyze with pathological results.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 232 patients with stage T3, T4 rectal cancer between January 1, 2017 and October 31, 2022. MR examination was performed within 3 days before surgery. Different MR sequences were used for mrT staging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and compared with pathological pT staging. The accuracy of different MR sequences in evaluating T staging of rectal cancer was calculated, and the consistency between the two was analyzed by kappa test. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of different MR sequences in evaluating rectal cancer invading mesorectal fascia after neoadjuvant therapy were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients with rectal cancer were included in the study. The accuracy of high-resolution T2 WI in evaluating T staging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy was 49.57%, and the Kappa value was 0.261. The accuracy of high-resolution T2WI combined with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating T staging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy was 61.64%, and the Kappa value was 0.411. The accuracy of high-resolution combined with DCE-MR images in evaluating T staging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy was 80.60%, and the Kappa value was 0.706. The sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution t2-weighted imaging (HR-T2WI) combined with dynamic contrast-enhancement magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) in evaluating the invasion of mesorectal fascia were 83.46% and 95.33%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with HR-T2WI combined with DWI images for mrT staging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (N-CRT), HR-T2WI combined with DCE-M has the highest accuracy in evaluating mrT staging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (80.60%), and has a high consistency with pathological pT staging. It is the best sequence for T staging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. At the same time, the sequence has high sensitivity and specificity in evaluating mesorectal fascia invasion, which can provide accurate perioperative information for the formulation of surgical plan.

Distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast tumors by performing a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the electronic databases PubMed and Embase from January 2000 to April 2020 for studies in English. Studies were included if they reported the sensitivity and specificity for identifying benign and malignant breast lesions using DWI or IVIM. Studies were reviewed according to QUADAS-2. The data inhomogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. In order to explore the influence of different field strengths and different b values on diagnostic efficiency, we conducted subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

We analyzed 79 studies, which included a total of 6294 patients with 4091 malignant lesions and 2793 benign lesions. Overall, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of ADC for detecting malignant breast tumors were 0.87 (0.86-0.88) and 0.80 (0.78-0.81), respectively. The PLR was 5.09 (4.16-6.24); the NLR was 0.15 (0.13-0.18); and the DOR was 38.95 (28.87-52.54). The AUC value was 0.9297. The highest performing parameter for IVIM was tissue diffusivity (D), and the pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.85 (0.82-0.88) and 0.87(0.83-0.90), respectively; the PLR was 5.65 (3.91-8.18); the NLR was 0.17 (0.12-0.26); and the DOR was 38.44 (23.57-62.69). The AUC value was 0.9265. Most of parameters demonstrated considerable statistically significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05, I²>50 %) except the pooled DOR, PLR of D and the pooled DOR and NLR of D*.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicated that DWI and IVIM had high sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions; and compared with DWI, IVIM could not further increase the diagnostic performance. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy.

Prediction of early response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer: Value of multi-parameter MRI combined with clinical prognostic factors

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the prediction of early response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) through a combination of pretreatment multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical prognostic factors (CPF) in cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with pathologically confirmed cervical cancer underwent conventional MRI, intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) before CCRT. The patients were divided into non- and residual tumor groups according to post-treatment MRI. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to pretreatment MRI parameters and CPF between the two groups, and optimal thresholds and predictive performance for post-treatment residual tumor occurrence were estimated by drawing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

There were 52 patients in non- and 33 in residual group. The residual group showed a lower perfusion fraction (f) value and volume transfer constant (Ktrans) value, a higher apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, diffusion coefficient (D) value and volume fraction of extravascular extracellular space (Ve) value, and a higher stage than the non-residual tumor group (all P < .05). D, Ktrans, Ve and stage were independent prognostic factors. The combination of D, Ktrans and Ve improved the diagnostic performance compared with individual MRI parameters. A further combination of these three MRI parameters with stage exhibited the highest predictive performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment D, Ktrans, Ve and stage were independent prognostic factors for cervical cancer. The predictive capacity of multi-parametric MRI was superior to individual MRI parameters. The combination of multi-parametric MRI with CPF further improved the predictive performance.

Diagnostic performance of whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis metrics for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram has been increasingly used for breast lesions, it has not been routinely used in clinical practice as an emergent promising imaging tool.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis metrics for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic PubMed/EMBASE/Cochrane electronic database search was performed for original diagnostic studies from 1 January 1970 to 2 January 2019. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were generated and meta-regression was performed to explore sources of heterogeneity according to study and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics.

RESULTS

Five original articles involving 493 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis were 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.81-0.89) and 0.79 (95% CI = 0.72-0.84) for distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9178. No publication bias was detected (P = 0.51). In subgroup analysis, the summary sensitivity and specificity of 50th percentile ADC value were 0.81 (95% CI = 0.71-0.88) and 0.86 (95% CI = 0.74-0.94), respectively. Meta-regression analysis indicated no covariates were sources of heterogeneity (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis demonstrated good diagnostic performance for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions, with 50th percentile ADC value showing higher diagnostic accuracy than other histogram parameters. Given the limited number of studies included in the analysis, the findings from our meta-analysis will need further confirmation in future research.

Ultra-High-b-Value Kurtosis Imaging for Noninvasive Tissue Characterization of Ovarian Lesions

Background MRI with contrast material enhancement is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. The role of diffusion-weighted MRI, however, remains controversial. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultra-high-b-value diffusion kurtosis MRI in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study evaluated consecutive women with sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses between November 2016 and December 2018. MRI at 3.0 T was performed, including diffusion-weighted MRI (b values of 0-2000 sec/mm²). Lesions were segmented on b of 1500 sec/mm² by two readers in consensus and an additional independent reader by using full-lesion segmentations on a single transversal slice. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculation and kurtosis fitting were performed. Differences in ADC, kurtosis-derived ADC (D_app), and apparent kurtosis coefficient (K_app) between malignant and benign lesions were assessed by using a logistic mixed model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for ADC, D_app, and K_app to discriminate malignant from benign lesions was calculated, as was specificity at a sensitivity level of 100%. Results from two independent reads were compared. Histopathologic analysis served as the reference standard. Results A total of 79 ovarian lesions in 58 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 48 years ± 14) were evaluated. Sixty-two (78%) lesions showed benign and 17 (22%) lesions showed malignant histologic findings. ADC and D_app were lower and K_app was higher in malignant lesions: median ADC, D_app, and K_app were 0.74 µm²/msec (range, 0.52-1.44 µm²/msec), 0.98 µm²/msec (range, 0.63-2.12 µm²/msec), and 1.01 (range, 0.69-1.30) for malignant lesions, and 1.13 µm²/msec (range, 0.35-2.63 µm²/msec), 1.45 µm²/msec (range, 0.44-3.34 µm²/msec), and 0.65 (range, 0.44-1.43) for benign lesions (P values of .01, .02, < .001, respectively). AUC for K_app of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.94) was higher than was AUC from ADC of 0.78 (95% confidence interval: 0.67, 0.89; P = .047). Conclusion Diffusion-weighted MRI by using quantitative kurtosis variables is superior to apparent diffusion coefficient values in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian lesions and might be of future help in clinical practice, especially in patients with contraindication to contrast media application. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Diagnostic performance of breast tumor tissue selection in diffusion weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several methods for tumor delineation are used in literature on breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) to measure the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). However, in the process of reaching consensus on breast DWI scanning protocol, image analysis and interpretation, still no standardized optimal breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method exists. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the impact of BTTS methods on ADC in the discrimination of benign from malignant breast lesions in DWI in terms of sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC).

METHODS AND FINDINGS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to the PRISMA statement, 61 studies, with 65 study subsets, in females with benign or malignant primary breast lesions (6291 lesions) were assessed. Studies on DWI, quantified by ADC, scanned on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla and using b-values 0/50 and ≥ 800 s/mm2 were included. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies up to 23-10-2019 (n = 2897). Data were pooled based on four BTTS methods (by definition of measured region of interest, ROI): BTTS1: whole breast tumor tissue selection, BTTS2: subtracted whole breast tumor tissue selection, BTTS3: circular breast tumor tissue selection and BTTS4: lowest diffusion breast tumor tissue selection. BTTS methods 2 and 3 excluded necrotic, cystic and hemorrhagic areas. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC of the BTTS methods were calculated. Heterogeneity was explored using the inconsistency index (I2) and considering covariables: field strength, lowest b-value, image of BTTS selection, pre-or post-contrast DWI, slice thickness and ADC threshold. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were: 0.82 (0.72-0.89), 0.79 (0.65-0.89), 0.88 (0.85-0.90) for BTTS1; 0.91 (0.89-0.93), 0.84 (0.80-0.87), 0.94 (0.91-0.96) for BTTS2; 0.89 (0.86-0.92), 0.90 (0.85-0.93), 0.95 (0.93-0.96) for BTTS3 and 0.90 (0.86-0.93), 0.84 (0.81-0.87), 0.86 (0.82-0.88) for BTTS4, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies (I2 = 95).

CONCLUSIONS

None of the breast tissue selection (BTTS) methodologies outperformed in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. The high heterogeneity of ADC data acquisition demands further standardization, such as DWI acquisition parameters and tumor tissue selection to substantially increase the reliability of DWI of the breast.

Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to provide evident data about use of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values for distinguishing malignant and benign breast lesions.

METHODS

MEDLINE library and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between ADC and malignancy/benignancy of breast lesions up to December 2018. Overall, 123 items were identified. The following data were extracted from the literature: authors, year of publication, study design, number of patients/lesions, lesion type, mean value and standard deviation of ADC, measure method, b values, and Tesla strength. The methodological quality of the 123 studies was checked according to the QUADAS-2 instrument. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used without any further correction to account for the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean ADC values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated separately for benign and malign lesions.

RESULTS

The acquired 123 studies comprised 13,847 breast lesions. Malignant lesions were diagnosed in 10,622 cases (76.7%) and benign lesions in 3225 cases (23.3%). The mean ADC value of the malignant lesions was 1.03 × 10^- 3 mm²/s and the mean value of the benign lesions was 1.5 × 10^- 3 mm²/s. The calculated ADC values of benign lesions were over the value of 1.00 × 10^- 3 mm²/s. This result was independent on Tesla strength, choice of b values, and measure methods (whole lesion measure vs estimation of ADC in a single area).

CONCLUSION

An ADC threshold of 1.00 × 10^- 3 mm²/s can be recommended for distinguishing breast cancers from benign lesions.

Whole-lesion histogram and texture analyses of breast lesions on inline quantitative DCE mapping with CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic capability of whole-lesion (WL) histogram and texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI inline-generated quantitative parametric maps using CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE (CDTV) to differentiate malignant from benign breast lesions and breast cancer subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2018 to November 2018, DCE MRI using CDTV was performed on 211 patients. The inline-generated parametric maps included K^trans, k_ep, V_e, and IAUGC₆₀. Histogram and texture features were extracted from the above parametric maps respectively based on a WL analysis. Student's t tests, one-way ANOVAs, Mann-Whitney U tests, Jonckheere-Terpstra tests, and ROC curves were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with benign breast lesions, malignant breast lesions showed significantly higher K^trans_{_median, 5th percentile, entropy, and diff-entropy}, IAUGC_{60_median, 5th percentile, entropy, and diff-entropy}, k_{ep_mean, median, 5th percentile, entropy, and diff-entropy}, and V_{e_95th percentile, diff-variance, and contrast}, and significantly lower k_{ep_skewness} and V_{e_SD, entropy, diff-entropy, and skewness} (all p ≤ 0.011). The combination of all the extracted parameters yielded an AUC of 0.85 (sensitivity 76%, specificity 86%). k_{ep_contrast} showed a significant difference among different subtypes of breast cancer (p = 0.006). k_{ep_skewness} showed a significant difference between lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative breast cancer (p = 0.007). The IAGC_{60_5th percentile} had an AUC of 0.71 (sensitivity 50%, specificity 91%) for differentiating between high- and low-proliferation groups of breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The WL histogram and texture analyses of CDTV-DCE-derived parameters may give additional information for further evaluation of breast cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Inline DCE mapping with CDTV is effective and time-saving. • WL histogram and texture-extracted features could distinguish breast cancer from benign lesions accurately. • k_{ep_contrast}, k_{ep_skewness}, and IAUGC_{60_5th percentile} could predict breast cancer subtypes, lymph node metastasis, and proliferation abilities, respectively.