Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

Free-Breathing Compressed Sensing Cine Cardiac MRI for Assessment of Left Ventricular Strain by Feature Tracking in Children

BACKGROUND

Cardiac MRI feature-tracking (FT) with breath-holding (BH) cine balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) imaging is well established. It is unclear whether FT-strain measurements can be reliably derived from free-breathing (FB) compressed sensing (CS) bSSFP imaging.

PURPOSE

To compare left ventricular (LV) strain analysis and image quality of an FB CS bSSFP cine sequence with that of a conventional BH bSSFP sequence in children.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

40 children able to perform BHs (cohort 1 [12.1 ± 2.2 years]) and 17 children unable to perform BHs (cohort 2 [5.2 ± 1.8 years]).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3T, bSSFP sequence with and without CS.

ASSESSMENT

Acquisition times and image quality were assessed. LV myocardial deformation parameters were compared between BH cine and FB CS cine studies in cohort 1. Strain indices and image quality of FB CS cine studies were also assessed in cohort 2. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of strain parameters was determined.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In cohort 1, the mean acquisition time of the FB CS cine study was significantly lower than for conventional BH cine study (15.6 s vs. 209.4 s). No significant difference were found in global circumferential strain rate (P = 0.089), global longitudinal strain rate (P = 0.366) and EuroCMR image quality scores (P = 0.128) between BH and FB sequences in cohort 1. The overall image quality score of FB CS cine in cohort 2 was 3.5 ± 0.5 with acquisition time of 14.7 ± 2.1 s. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were good to excellent (ICC = 0.810 to 0.943).

DATA CONCLUSION

FB CS cine imaging may be a promising alternative technique for strain assessment in pediatric patients with poor BH ability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Feature-Tracking Strain Parameters Differ Between Highly Accelerated and Conventional Acquisitions: A Multisoftware Assessment

BACKGROUND

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocols have been adapted to fit the needs for faster, more efficient acquisitions, resulting in the development of highly accelerated, compressed sensing-based (CS) sequences. The aim of this study was to evaluate intersoftware and interacquisition differences for postprocessing software applied to both CS and conventional cine sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 106 individuals (66 healthy volunteers, 40 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, 51% female, 38±17 y) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance at 3T with retrospectively gated conventional cine and CS sequences. Postprocessing was performed using 2 commercially available software solutions and 1 research prototype from 3 different developers. The agreement of clinical and feature-tracking strain parameters between software solutions and acquisition types was assessed by Bland-Altmann analyses and intraclass correlation coefficients. Differences between softwares and acquisitions were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variances. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curve-derived cutoffs were used to evaluate whether sequence-specific cutoffs influence disease classification.

RESULTS

There were significant intersoftware ( P <0.002 for all except LV end-diastolic volume per body surface area) and interacquisition differences ( P <0.02 for all except end-diastolic volume per body surface area from Neosoft, left ventricular mass per body surface area from cvi42 and TrufiStrain and global circumferential strain from Neosoft). However, the intraclass correlation coefficients between acquisitions were strong-to-excellent for all parameters (all ≥0.81). In comparing individual softwares to a pooled mean, Bland-Altmann analyses revealed smaller magnitudes of bias for cine acquisition than for CS acquisition. In addition, the application of conventional cutoffs to CS measurements did not result in the false reclassification of patients.

CONCLUSION

Significantly lower magnitudes of strain and volumetric parameters were observed in retrospectively gated CS acquisitions, despite strong-to-excellent agreement amongst software solutions and acquisition types. It remains important to be aware of the acquisition type in the context of follow-up examinations, where different cutoffs might lead to misclassifications.

The effects of flip angle and gadolinium contrast agent on single breath-hold compressed sensing cardiac magnetic resonance cine for biventricular global strain assessment

Background

Due to its potential to significantly reduce scanning time while delivering accurate results for cardiac volume function, compressed sensing (CS) has gained traction in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine. However, further investigation is necessary to explore its feasibility and impact on myocardial strain results.

Materials and methods

A total of 102 participants [75 men, 46.5 ± 17.1 (SD) years] were included in this study. Each patient underwent four consecutive cine sequences with the same slice localization, including the reference multi-breath-hold balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFPref) cine, the CS cine with the same flip angle as bSSFPref before (CS45) and after (eCS45) contrast enhancement, and the CS cine (eCS70) with a 70-degree flip angle after contrast enhancement. Biventricular strain parameters were derived from cine images. Two-tailed paired t-tests were used for data analysis.

Results

Global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were observed to be significantly lower in comparison to those obtained from bSSFPref sequences for both the right and left ventricles (all p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed on biventricular GRS-LAX (long-axis) and GLS values derived from enhanced and unenhanced CS cine sequences with the same flip angle, but remarkable reductions were noted in GRS-SAX (short-axis) and GCS values (p < 0.001). After contrast injection, a larger flip angle caused a significant elevation in left ventricular strain results (p < 0.001) but did not affect the right ventricle. The increase in flip angle appeared to compensate for contrast agent affection on left ventricular GRS-SAX, GCS values, and right ventricular GRS-LAX, GLS values.

Conclusion

Despite incorporating gadolinium contrast agents and applying larger flip angles, single breath-hold CS cine sequences consistently yielded diminished strain values for both ventricles when compared with conventional cine sequences. Prior to employing this single breath-hold CS cine sequence to refine the clinical CMR examination procedure, it is crucial to consider its impact on myocardial strain results.

A new compressed sensing cine cardiac MRI sequence with free-breathing real-time acquisition and fully automated motion-correction: A comprehensive evaluation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare a new free-breathing compressed sensing cine (FB-CS) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to the standard reference multi-breath-hold segmented cine (BH-SEG) CMR in an unselected population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January to April 2021, 52 consecutive adult patients who underwent both conventional BH-SEG CMR and new FB-CS CMR with fully automated respiratory motion correction were retrospectively enrolled. There were 29 men and 23 women with a mean age of 57.7 ± 18.9 (standard deviation [SD]) years (age range: 19.0-90.0 years) and a mean cardiac rate of 74.6 ± 17.9 (SD) bpm. For each patient, short-axis stacks were acquired with similar parameters providing a spatial resolution of 1.8 × 1.8 × 8.0 mm3 and 25 cardiac frames. Acquisition and reconstruction times, image quality (Likert scale from 1 to 4), left and right ventricular volumes and ejection fractions, left ventricular mass, and global circumferential strain were assessed for each sequence.

RESULTS

FB-CS CMR acquisition time was significantly shorter (123.8 ± 28.4 [SD] s vs. 267.2 ± 39.3 [SD] s for BH-SEG CMR; P < 0.0001) at the penalty of a longer reconstruction time (271.4 ± 68.7 [SD] s vs. 9.9 ± 2.1 [SD] s for BH-SEG CMR; P < 0.0001). In patients without arrhythmia or dyspnea, FB-CS CMR provided subjective image quality that was not different from that of BH-SEG CMR (P = 0.13). FB-CS CMR improved image quality in patients with arrhythmia (n = 18; P = 0.002) or dyspnea (n = 7; P = 0.02), and the edge sharpness was improved at end-systole and end-diastole (P = 0.0001). No differences were observed between the two techniques in ventricular volumes and ejection fractions, left ventricular mass or global circumferential strain in patients in sinus rhythm or with cardiac arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

This new FB-CS CMR addresses respiratory motion and arrhythmia-related artifacts without compromising the reliability of ventricular functional assessment.

Compressed sensing cine imaging with higher temporal resolution for analysis of left atrial strain and strain rate by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking

PURPOSE

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) is more widely used in the measurement of left atrial (LA) strain and strain rate (SR). However, in recent years, researchers have attempted to improve the low temporal resolution of CMR-FT to better capture the subtle deformations of the myocardium. The technique of compressed sensing (CS) has been applied clinically, reducing scan time while increasing temporal resolution. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of the increased temporal resolution of CS cine sequences on the analysis of LA longitudinal strain and SR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine healthy subjects were included in the study. They underwent CMR with a reference steady-state free precession cine sequence of conventional temporal resolution (standard SSFP sequence), a cine sequence of higher temporal resolution (HT sequence), and an HT cine sequence with CS (CS HT sequence) (temporal resolution: 22.1-44.3/24.9-47.1 ms, 11.1-19.4 ms, and 8.3-19.4 ms, respectively). The standard SSFP sequence, HT sequence, and CS HT sequence were acquired in all subjects during the same scanning session. LA longitudinal strain and SR, reflecting LA reservoir, conduit, and contraction booster-pump function, were measured by CMR-FT and compared among the three sequences.

RESULTS

The measurements of LASR reservoir, conduit, and booster-pump were significantly higher on the HT and CS HT sequences than on the standard SSFP sequence. The standard SSFP sequence was correlated significantly with the HT and CS HT sequences in terms of LA strain and SR analysis, respectively. The LA strain and SR measurements also showed excellent agreement between the HT and CS HT sequences.

CONCLUSION

Higher temporal resolution led to significantly higher measured LASR values in CMR-FT. Furthermore, the addition of CS reduced scan time and did not affect LA longitudinal strain or SR analysis.

Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Highly accelerated compressed sensing cine has allowed for quantification of ventricular function in a single breath hold. However, compared to segmented breath hold techniques, there may be underestimation or overestimation of LV volumes. Furthermore, a heterogeneous sample of techniques have been used in volunteers and patients for pre-clinical and clinical use. This can complicate individual comparisons where small, but statistically significant differences exist in left ventricular morphological and/or functional parameters. This meta-analysis aims to provide a comparison of conventional cine versus compressed sensing based reconstruction techniques in patients and volunteers.

METHODS

Two investigators performed systematic searches for eligible studies using PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science to identify studies published 1/1/2010-3/1/2021. Ultimately, 15 studies were included for comparison between compressed sensing cine and conventional imaging.

RESULTS

Compared to conventional cine, there were small, statistically significant overestimation of LV mass, underestimation of stroke volume and LV end diastolic volume (mean difference 2.65 g [CL 0.57-4.73], 2.52 mL [CL 0.73-4.31], and 2.39 mL [CL 0.07-4.70], respectively). Attenuated differences persisted across studies using prospective gating (underestimated stroke volume) and non-prospective gating (underestimation of stroke volume, overestimation of mass). There were no significant differences in LV volumes or LV mass with high or low acceleration subgroups in reference to conventional cine except slight underestimation of ejection fraction among high acceleration studies. Reduction in breath hold acquisition time ranged from 33 to 64%, while reduction in total scan duration ranged from 43 to 97%.

CONCLUSION

LV volume and mass assessment using compressed sensing CMR is accurate compared to conventional parallel imaging cine.

Feasibility of one breath-hold cardiovascular magnetic resonance compressed sensing cine for left ventricular strain analysis

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of 3D left ventricular global and regional strain by using one breath-hold (BH) compressed sensing cine (CSC) protocol and determine the agreement between CSC and conventional cine (CC) protocols.

Methods

A total of 30 volunteers were enrolled in this study. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images were acquired using a 1.436 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. The CSC protocols included one BH CSC and the shortest BH CSC protocols with different parameters and were only performed in short-axis (SA) view following CC protocols. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastole volume (EDV), end-systole volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) global and regional strain were calculated by CC, one BH CSC, and shortest BH CSC protocols. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variance (CV) of these parameters were used to determine the agreement between different acquisitions.

Results

The agreement of all volumetric variables and EF between the CC protocol and one BH CSC protocol was excellent (ICC &gt; 0.9). EDV, ESV, and SV between CC and shortest BH CSC protocols also had a remarkable coherence (ICC &gt; 0.9). The agreement of 3D LV global strain assessment between CC protocol and one BH CSC protocol was good (ICC &gt; 0.8). Most CVs of variables were also good (CV &lt; 15%). ICCs of all variables were lower than 0.8. CVs of all parameters were higher than 15% except global longitudinal strain (GLS) between CC and shortest BH CSC protocols. The agreement of regional strain between CC and BH CSC protocols was heterogeneous (-0.2 &lt; ICC &lt; 0.7). Many variables of CVs were poor.

Conclusion

Notably, one BH CSC protocol can be used for 3D global strain analysis, along with a good correlation with the CC protocol. The regional strain should continue to be computed by the CC protocol due to poor agreement and a remarkable variation between the protocols. The shortest BH CSC protocol was insufficient to replace the CC protocol for 3D global and regional strain.

Left Ventricular Strain Measurements Derived from MR Feature Tracking: A Head-to-Head Comparison of a Higher Temporal Resolution Method With a Conventional Method

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance feature tracking (MR-FT) is an imaging technique that quantifies both global and regional myocardial strain. Currently, conventional MR-FT provides a superior signal and contrast-to-noise ratio but has a relatively low temporal resolution. A higher temporal resolution MR-FT technique may provide improved results.

PURPOSE

To explore the impact of higher temporal resolution on left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain measurements using MR-FT.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

One hundred and fifty-three participants including five healthy subjects and patients with various cardiac diseases referred to MR for cardiac assessment.

FIELD STRENGTH

3 T, balanced steady-state free precession sequence with and without compressed sensing (temporal resolution: 10 msec and 40 msec, respectively).

ASSESSMENT

Conventional (40 msec) and higher (10 msec) temporal resolution data were acquired in all subjects during the same scanning session. Global circumferential strain (GCS), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and global radial strain (GRS) as well as peak systolic and diastolic strain rates (SRs) were measured by MR-FT and compared between the two temporal resolutions. We also performed subgroup analyses according to heart rates (HRs) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF).

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, linear regression analyses, Bland-Altman plots. A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

GCS and GRS were significantly higher in the 10-msec temporal resolution studies compared to the 40-msec temporal resolution studies (GCS: -13.00 ± 6.58% vs. -12.51 ± 5.76%; GRS: 21.97 ± 14.54% vs. 20.62 ± 12.52%). In the subgroup analyses, significantly higher GLS, GCS, and GRS values were obtained in subjects with LVEF ≥50%, and significantly higher GCS and GRS values were obtained in subjects with HRs <70 bpm when assessed with the 10-msec vs. the 40-msec temporal resolutions. All the peak systolic and diastolic SRs were significantly higher in the higher temporal resolution acquisitions. This was also true for all subgroups.

DATA CONCLUSIONS

Higher temporal resolution resulted in significantly higher cardiac strain and SR values using MR-FT and could be beneficial, particularly in patients with LVEF ≥50% and HR <70 bpm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.