Dynamic pressure-volume loop analysis by simultaneous real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance and left heart catheterization

Comparison of admittance and cardiac magnetic resonance generated pressure-volume loops in a porcine model

Objective. Pressure-volume loop analysis, traditionally performed by invasive pressure and volume measurements, is the optimal method for assessing ventricular function, while cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold standard for ventricular volume estimation. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between the assessment of end-systolic elastance (Ees) assessed with combined CMR and simultaneous pressure catheter measurements compared with admittance catheters in a porcine model.Approach. Seven healthy pigs underwent admittance-based pressure-volume loop evaluation followed by a second assessment with CMR during simultaneous pressure measurements.Main results. Admittance overestimated end-diastolic volume for both the left ventricle (LV) and the right ventricle (RV) compared with CMR. Further, there was an underestimation of RV end-systolic volume with admittance. For the RV, however, Ees was systematically higher when assessed with CMR plus simultaneous pressure measurements compared with admittance whereas there was no systematic difference in Ees but large differences between admittance and CMR-based methods for the LV.Significance. LV and RV Ees can be obtained from both admittance and CMR based techniques. There were discrepancies in volume estimates between admittance and CMR based methods, especially for the RV. RV Ees was higher when estimated by CMR with simultaneous pressure measurements compared with admittance.

Crafting a Rigorous, Clinically Relevant Large Animal Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia: What Have We Learned in 20 Years?

The past several decades have borne witness to several breakthroughs and paradigm shifts within the field of cardiovascular medicine, but one component that has remained constant throughout this time is the need for accurate animal models for the refinement and elaboration of the hypotheses and therapies crucial to our capacity to combat human disease. Numerous sophisticated and high-throughput molecular strategies have emerged, including rational drug design and the multi-omics approaches that allow extensive characterization of the host response to disease states and their prospective resolutions, but these technologies all require grounding within a faithful representation of their clinical context. Over this period, our lab has exhaustively tested, progressively refined, and extensively contributed to cardiovascular discovery on the basis of one such faithful representation. It is the purpose of this paper to review our porcine model of chronic myocardial ischemia using ameroid constriction and the subsequent myriad of physiological and molecular-biological insights it has allowed our lab to attain and describe. We hope that, by depicting our methods and the insight they have yielded clearly and completely-drawing for this purpose on comprehensive videographic illustration-other research teams will be empowered to carry our work forward, drawing on our experience to refine their own investigations into the pathogenesis and eradication of cardiovascular disease.

Cardiac MRI at Low Field Strengths

Cardiac MR imaging is well established for assessment of cardiovascular structure and function, myocardial scar, quantitative flow, parametric mapping, and myocardial perfusion. Despite the clear evidence supporting the use of cardiac MRI for a wide range of indications, it is underutilized clinically. Recent developments in low-field MRI technology, including modern data acquisition and image reconstruction methods, are enabling high-quality low-field imaging that may improve the cost-benefit ratio for cardiac MRI. Studies to-date confirm that low-field MRI offers high measurement concordance and consistent interpretation with clinical imaging for several routine sequences. Moreover, low-field MRI may enable specific new clinical opportunities for cardiac imaging such as imaging near metal implants, MRI-guided interventions, combined cardiopulmonary assessment, and imaging of patients with severe obesity. In this review, we discuss the recent progress in low-field cardiac MRI with a focus on technical developments and early clinical validation studies. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Non-invasive pressure-volume loops using the elastance model and CMR: a porcine validation at transient pre-loads

Aims

Pressure-volume (PV) loops have utility in the evaluation of cardiac pathophysiology but require invasive measurements. Recently, a time-varying elastance model to derive PV loops non-invasively was proposed, using left ventricular (LV) volume by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and brachial cuff pressure as inputs. Validation was performed using CMR and pressure measurements acquired on the same day, but not simultaneously, and without varying pre-loads. This study validates the non-invasive elastance model used to estimate PV loops at varying pre-loads, compared with simultaneous measurements of invasive pressure and volume from real-time CMR, acquired concurrent to an inferior vena cava (IVC) occlusion.

Methods and results

We performed dynamic PV loop experiments under CMR guidance in 15 pigs (n = 7 naïve, n = 8 with ischaemic cardiomyopathy). Pre-load was altered by IVC occlusion, while simultaneously acquiring invasive LV pressures and volumes from real-time CMR. Pairing pressure and volume signals yielded invasive PV loops, and model-based PV loops were derived using real-time LV volumes. Haemodynamic parameters derived from invasive and model-based PV loops were compared. Across 15 pigs, 297 PV loops were recorded. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement was excellent between model-based and invasive parameters: stroke work (bias = 0.007 ± 0.03 J, ICC = 0.98), potential energy (bias = 0.02 ± 0.03 J, ICC = 0.99), ventricular energy efficiency (bias = -0.7 ± 2.7%, ICC = 0.98), contractility (bias = 0.04 ± 0.1 mmHg/mL, ICC = 0.97), and ventriculoarterial coupling (bias = 0.07 ± 0.15, ICC = 0.99). All haemodynamic parameters differed between naïve and cardiomyopathy animals (P < 0.05). The invasive vs. model-based PV loop dice similarity coefficient was 0.88 ± 0.04.

Conclusion

An elastance model-based estimation of PV loops and associated haemodynamic parameters provided accurate measurements at transient loading conditions compared with invasive PV loops.