CD163+ macrophages monitor enhanced permeability at the blood-dorsal root ganglion barrier

In dorsal root ganglia (DRG), macrophages reside close to sensory neurons and have largely been explored in the context of pain, nerve injury, and repair. However, we discovered that most DRG macrophages interact with and monitor the vasculature by sampling macromolecules from the blood. Characterization of the DRG vasculature revealed a specialized endothelial bed that transformed in molecular, structural, and permeability properties along the arteriovenous axis and was covered by macrophage-interacting pericytes and fibroblasts. Macrophage phagocytosis spatially aligned with peak endothelial permeability, a process regulated by enhanced caveolar transcytosis in endothelial cells. Profiling the DRG immune landscape revealed two subsets of perivascular macrophages with distinct transcriptome, turnover, and function. CD163+ macrophages self-maintained locally, specifically participated in vasculature monitoring, displayed distinct responses during peripheral inflammation, and were conserved in mouse and man. Our work provides a molecular explanation for the permeability of the blood-DRG barrier and identifies an unappreciated role of macrophages as integral components of the DRG-neurovascular unit.

Non-invasive pressure-volume loops using the elastance model and CMR: a porcine validation at transient pre-loads

Aims

Pressure-volume (PV) loops have utility in the evaluation of cardiac pathophysiology but require invasive measurements. Recently, a time-varying elastance model to derive PV loops non-invasively was proposed, using left ventricular (LV) volume by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and brachial cuff pressure as inputs. Validation was performed using CMR and pressure measurements acquired on the same day, but not simultaneously, and without varying pre-loads. This study validates the non-invasive elastance model used to estimate PV loops at varying pre-loads, compared with simultaneous measurements of invasive pressure and volume from real-time CMR, acquired concurrent to an inferior vena cava (IVC) occlusion.

Methods and results

We performed dynamic PV loop experiments under CMR guidance in 15 pigs (n = 7 naïve, n = 8 with ischaemic cardiomyopathy). Pre-load was altered by IVC occlusion, while simultaneously acquiring invasive LV pressures and volumes from real-time CMR. Pairing pressure and volume signals yielded invasive PV loops, and model-based PV loops were derived using real-time LV volumes. Haemodynamic parameters derived from invasive and model-based PV loops were compared. Across 15 pigs, 297 PV loops were recorded. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement was excellent between model-based and invasive parameters: stroke work (bias = 0.007 ± 0.03 J, ICC = 0.98), potential energy (bias = 0.02 ± 0.03 J, ICC = 0.99), ventricular energy efficiency (bias = -0.7 ± 2.7%, ICC = 0.98), contractility (bias = 0.04 ± 0.1 mmHg/mL, ICC = 0.97), and ventriculoarterial coupling (bias = 0.07 ± 0.15, ICC = 0.99). All haemodynamic parameters differed between naïve and cardiomyopathy animals (P < 0.05). The invasive vs. model-based PV loop dice similarity coefficient was 0.88 ± 0.04.

Conclusion

An elastance model-based estimation of PV loops and associated haemodynamic parameters provided accurate measurements at transient loading conditions compared with invasive PV loops.