Predictors of the response to etanercept in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis without systemic manifestations within 12 months: results of an open-label, prospective study conducted at the National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health, Russia

Drug therapy in juvenile spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes latest developments in treatment of juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA), specifically enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) and juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA).

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been addition of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) beyond tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for JSpA such as IL-17 blockers, IL-23 blockers, and janus activating kinase inhibitors with favorable safety profile. Conducting robust clinical trials for this subpopulation of JIA remains a challenge; extrapolation studies are being used to obtain approval from regulatory agencies.

SUMMARY

Newer drug therapies have expanded the scope of treatment for patients with JSpA. bDMARDs such as adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and secukinumab have demonstrated clinically significant treatment efficacy in ERA and JPsA. Based on extrapolation studies, intravenous golimumab, etanercept, abatacept, and ustekinumab have gained Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for JPsA. Long-term follow-up studies continue to demonstrate acceptable safety profiles. There is need for more real-world data on drug efficacy from Registry studies and research on effective de-escalation strategies.

Overlap of International League of Associations for Rheumatology and Preliminary Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization Classification Criteria for Nonsystemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in an Established UK Multicentre Inception Cohort

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to assess the degree of overlap between existing International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) and preliminary Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

Participants from the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study, a multicenter UK JIA inception cohort, were classified using the PRINTO and ILAR classification criteria into distinct categories. Systemic JIA was excluded because several classification items were not collected in this cohort. Adaptations to PRINTO criteria were required to apply to a UK health care setting, including limiting the number of blood biomarker tests required. The overlap between categories under the two systems was determined, and any differences in characteristics between groups were described.

RESULTS

A total of 1,223 children and young people with a physician's diagnosis of JIA were included. Using PRINTO criteria, the majority of the patients had "other JIA" (69.5%). There was a high degree of overlap (91%) between the PRINTO enthesitis/spondylitis- and ILAR enthesitis-related JIA categories. The PRINTO rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive category was composed of 48% ILAR RF-positive polyarthritis and 52% undifferentiated JIA. The early-onset antinuclear antibodies-positive PRINTO category was largely composed of ILAR oligoarthritis (50%), RF-negative polyarthritis (24%), and undifferentiated JIA (23%). A few patients were unclassified under PRINTO (n = 3) and would previously have been classified as enthesitis-related JIA (n = 1) and undifferentiated JIA (n = 2) under ILAR.

CONCLUSION

Under the preliminary PRINTO classification criteria for childhood arthritis, most children are not yet classified into a named category. These data can help support further delineation of the PRINTO criteria to ensure homogenous groups of children can be identified.

Successful stopping of biologic therapy for remission in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Clinicians concerned about long-term safety of biologics in JIA may consider tapering or stopping treatment once remission is achieved despite uncertainty in maintaining drug-free remission. This analysis aims to (i) calculate how many patients with JIA stop biologics for remission, (ii) calculate how many later re-start therapy and after how long, and (iii) identify factors associated with re-starting biologics.

METHODS

Patients starting biologics between 1 January 2010 and 7 September 2021 in the UK JIA Biologics Register were included. Patients stopping biologics for physician-reported remission, those re-starting biologics and factors associated with re-starting, were identified. Multiple imputation accounted for missing data.

RESULTS

Of 1451 patients with median follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR 1.4, 4.0), 269 (19%) stopped biologics for remission after a median of 2.2 years (IQR 1.7, 3.0). Of those with follow-up data (N = 220), 118 (54%) later re-started therapy after a median of 4.7 months, with 84% re-starting the same biologic. Patients on any-line tocilizumab (prior to stopping) were less likely to re-start biologics (vs etanercept; odds ratio [OR] 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.7), while those with a longer disease duration prior to biologics (OR 1.1 per year increase; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.2) or prior uveitis were more likely to re-start biologics (OR 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 4.9).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis identified factors associated with successful cessation of biologics for remission in JIA as absence of uveitis, prior treatment with tocilizumab and starting biologics earlier in the disease course. Further research is needed to guide clinical recommendations.

Association Between Patient‐Reported Outcomes and Treatment Failure in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Objective

Children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) frequently exhibit symptoms months before diagnosis. The aims of this study were to assess whether baseline patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are associated with changes in JIA pharmacotherapy treatment and whether symptom duration prior to JIA diagnosis is associated with disease activity scores over time.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with an incident diagnosis of JIA. Patient‐reported symptom duration, pain, energy, disease activity, sleep, anxiety, and depression screenings, as well as provider‐reported disease activity and joint count, were collected during routine clinical care. Cox proportional hazards evaluated PROs, disease activity scores, and symptom duration with initial medication failure within 9 months of diagnosis. Multivariate mixed effects linear regression evaluated the association of symptom duration with disease activity scores.

Results

There were 58 children (66% female, 35% oligoarticular JIA) in the cohort. Nearly half of patients failed initial therapy within 9 months. Unadjusted analysis showed that higher energy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69‐0.99; P = 0.04) and longer symptom duration (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93‐0.99; P = 0.03) at diagnosis were protective against medication failure. Adjusted analysis showed that symptom duration prior to diagnosis was protective against medication failure (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92‐0.99; P = 0.02); there was no association between medication failure and pain, psychiatric symptoms, or disease activity scores. There was a positive association with longer symptom duration and higher disease activity at 30 and 60 days, but this was not sustained.

Conclusion

Higher energy levels and longer symptom duration are protective against initial JIA treatment failures. Initial treatments informed by patient‐reported data could lead to more successful outcomes by changes in treatment paradigms.

Probability of Response in the First Sixteen Weeks After Starting Biologics: An Analysis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Biologics Trials

OBJECTIVES

Most juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) trials used an open-label run-in period followed by randomized medication withdrawal. We used data from the run-in period of 4 bDMARD trials to 1) delineate early response trajectory to bDMARDs and 2) identify predictors of early response.

METHODS

Data from the first 16 weeks of 4 bDMARD trials were used. The primary outcome was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 50 (Pedi 50) response criteria: clinically significant response defined as ACR Pedi 50 or greater. The secondary outcome was the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (cJADAS10) minimal disease activity state. Response transition rates and predictors were modeled using an inhomogeneous Markov multistate model.

RESULTS

Five hundred thirty-two participants (70% receiving methotrexate, 41% prednisone) were included. By month 4, the probability of attaining ACR Pedi 50 or greater was 0.698. If ACR Pedi 50 or more was not achieved by month 1, the probability of achieving it by month 4 was 0.60. If ACR Pedi 50 or more was not achieved by month 3, the probability of achieving this by month 4 was 0.31. Age at diagnosis, disease duration, baseline rheumatoid factor, and active joint counts predicted ACR and cJADAS state transitions, adjusted for concomitant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

No response ACR Pedi 50 or more by month 1 after treatment was associated with a 0.60 probability of responding by month 4, but not responding by month 3 was associated with a 0.31 probability of response by month 4. Baseline disease duration, rheumatoid factor, and active joint counts predicted early treatment response (ACR and cJADAS10 states).

Comparison of the outcomes between early and late anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with enthesitis-related subcategory of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a multi-center study in Southeast Asia

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the impact of delayed initiation of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA). Here, we compared the impact of delayed treatment on disease outcomes of ERA patients in Southeast Asia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 149 ERA patients from Thailand and Singapore. Early (e-aTNF) and late (l-aTNF) treatment groups received anti-TNF therapy starting at ≤6 months and >6 months, respectively, after diagnosis. Outcomes included mean differences in disease activity parameters, Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity (JSpADA) score, Juvenile Arthritis Diseases Activity (JADAS)-10 score, and American College of Rheumatology Pediatric (ACR Pedi) criteria, and the frequency of clinically inactive disease and first flare event.

RESULTS

The mean changes in JSpADA (p = 0.002) and JADAS-10 (p < 0.001) scores over time were significantly higher in the e-aTNF group than in the l-aTNF group. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the e-aTNF group than l-aTNF group satisfied ACR Pedi 100 criteria at 2 years (p = 0.042). All other long-term outcomes were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although early anti-TNF treatment improved disease activity parameters somewhat better than delayed anti-TNF therapy, there was no significant difference in long-term outcomes.

Research progress in drug therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in children. With the gradual expansion of the incidence of JIA in the population, the pathogenesis and treatment of JIA were further explored and analyzed, and JIA has achieved some success in drug therapy.

DATA SOURCES

A systemic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, and the EU Clinical Trials Register. Through the searching of clinical trials of JIA in recent years, we summarized the progress of the clinical treatment of JIA.

RESULTS

The main treatment drugs for JIA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biological agents. So far, a variety of biological agents targeting the cytokines and receptors involved in its pathogenesis have been gradually approved for JIA in many countries. The application of biological agents in JIA showed good efficacy and safety, bringing unprecedented experience to children and adolescents with JIA.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential and advantages of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA are significant, and the application of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA will be more and more common.

Biomarkers of Response to Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic inflammatory arthritis of childhood, characterized by various clinical phenotypes associated with variable prognosis. Significant progress has been achieved with the use of biologic treatments, which specifically block pro-inflammatory molecules involved in the disease pathogenesis. The most commonly used biologics in JIA are monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins targeting interleukins 1 (IL-1) and 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α). Several biomarkers have been investigated in JIA. Aims: To assess the level of evidence available regarding the role of biomarkers in JIA related to guiding clinical and therapeutic decisions, providing disease prognostic information, facilitating disease activity monitoring and assessing biologic treatment response in JIA, as well as propose new strategies for biologic therapy-related biomarker use in JIA. Methods: We searched PubMed for relevant literature using predefined key words corresponding to several categories of biomarkers to assess their role in predicting and assessing biologic treatment response and clinical remission in JIA. Results: We reviewed serological, cellular, genetic, transcriptomic and imaging biomarkers, to identify candidates that are both well-established and widely used, as well as newly investigated in JIA on biologic therapy. We evaluated their role in management of JIA as well as identified the unmet needs for new biomarker discovery and better clinical applications. Conclusion: Although there are no ideal biomarkers in JIA, we identified serological biomarkers with potential clinical utility. We propose strategies of combining biomarkers of response to biologics in JIA, as well as routine implementation of clinically acceptable imaging biomarkers for improved disease assessment performance.

JNK Pathway-Associated Phosphatase as a Serum Marker for Disease Activity and Treatment Outcome of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by arthritis of unknown etiology. JNK pathway-associated phosphatase (JKAP) is reported to be a negative regulator of T-cell activation, but its clinical role in JIA is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the correlation of JKAP with disease activity and treatment response to a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, etanercept (ETN), in JIA patients. Totally, 104 JIA patients (6.9 ± 2.7 years old) and 100 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) (7.2 ± 2.4 years old) were enrolled, and their serum samples were collected for measuring JKAP by enzyme-linked immunoassay. In JIA patients, after 24-week ETN treatment, clinical response was assessed based on the American College of Rheumatology pediatric criteria (ACRpedi) 50 criteria. Results showed that JKAP levels were significantly lower in JIA patients compared with HCs, and of good value in differentiating JIA patients from HCs. Among JIA patients, higher JKAP levels were associated with lower disease activity indexes, including C-reactive protein, number of joints with active arthritis, physician's global assessment of disease activity, and the present history of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; higher baseline JKAP levels were correlated with worse ACRpedi 50 response to ETN at week 24, and was also an independent predictive factor for worse ACRpedi 50 response to ETN. Thus, it may be inappropriate to use ETN for JIA patients with higher JKAP levels. In conclusion, serum JKAP is a potential biomarker for JIA activity and treatment response to a TNF inhibitor.

Predicting disease severity and remission in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: are we getting closer?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize current research on the prediction of severe disease or remission in children with juvenile arthritis, and define further steps needed towards developing prediction tools with sufficient accuracy for clinical use.

RECENT FINDINGS

High disease activity, poor patient-reported outcomes, ankle or wrist involvement, and a longer time from onset to the start of treatment herald a severe disease course and a low chance of remission. Other studies confirmed that age less than 7 years and positive ANA are the strongest predictors of uveitis development. Preliminary evidence suggests ultrasound findings may predict flare in patients with clinically inactive disease, and several new biomarkers show promise. A few prediction tools that combine predictors to estimate the chance of remission or a severe disease course in the medium-term to long-term have shown good accuracy when internally validated in the population in which they were developed.

SUMMARY

Promising candidate tools for predicting disease severity and long-term remission in juvenile arthritis are now available. These tools need external validation in other populations, and ideally formal trials to assess whether their use in practice improves patient outcomes. We are definitively getting closer, but we are not there yet.

Predicting disease outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: challenges, evidence, and new directions

The aims of treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis are to elicit treatment response toward remission, while preventing future flares. Understanding patient and disease characteristics that predispose young people with this condition to these outcomes would allow the forecasting of disease process and the tailoring of therapies. The strongest predictor of remission is disease category, particularly oligoarthritis, although a few additional clinical predictors of treatment response have been identified. Novel evidence using biomarkers, such as S100 proteins and novel single nucleotide polymorphism data, could add value to clinical models. The future aim of personalised medicine in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis will be aided with international collaborations, allowing for the analysis of larger datasets with novel biomarker data. Combined clinical and biomarker panels will probably be required for predicting outcomes in such a complex disease.

Enthesitis-related arthritis: current perspectives

In this narrative review, we overview the recent literature on enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA). For the purpose of our review, we searched Scopus for recent articles on this subject from 2013 onward, including some classic older articles for perspective. ERA is a juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) subtype more common in males, associated in a majority with human leucocyte antigen B27. Such children generally present with asymmetric oligoarthritis or polyarthritis, predominantly of lower limb joints, associated with enthesitis or sacroiliitis. While diagnosis remains clinical, ultrasound is being increasingly used to detect subclinical enthesitis and for guiding entheseal site injections. Spine MRI can help detect sacroiliitis, inflammatory spinal changes, and pelvic sites of enthesitis in such patients. The recent juvenile spondyloarthropathy disease activity index recognizes the key clinical features of ERA, viz enthesitis and inflammatory back pain, which other disease activity indices used in JIA did not include. Management includes NSAIDs with physical therapy. Conventional disease-modifying agents like sulfasalazine and methotrexate may be used to minimize duration of NSAID use and in those with high inflammatory burden. In patients refractory to these drugs, biologics such as antitumor necrosis factor alpha agents have proven useful, based on evidences from randomized controlled trials and retrospective registry analyses. Factors predicting a poorer outcome in such children include hip or ankle involvement or restricted spinal mobility. Considering that children with ERA have overall poorer long-term outcomes than other subtypes of JIA, there is a need to further optimize therapeutic strategies for such patients.

The association of CAT-262C/T polymorphism with catalase activity and treatment response in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Oxidative stress is believed to be of great importance for both the etiology and the persistence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The aim of this study was to investigate the association of -262C/T polymorphism of the catalase (CAT) gene with JIA, as well as to evaluate whether this polymorphism can influence plasma CAT activity and outcome in JIA patients treated with etanercept. A total of 154 subjects (60 JIA patients and 94 healthy volunteers) were screened for CAT-262C/T gene polymorphism using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Plasma CAT activity was determined using the spectrophotometric method according to Goth, prior to and 12 months after anti-TNF (etanercept) therapy. Clinical outcome was assessed using the JIA ACR (American College of Rheumatology) response criteria. The genotype and allele frequency distributions of CAT-262C/T polymorphism in the patients were significantly different from those of the controls (p = 0.014, p = 0.006). The TT genotype (polymorphic homozygous) was associated with a 4.36-fold higher likelihood of having JIA (95% CI 1.545-12.323, p = 0.005) as compared to the CC genotype (wild-type). At month 12 of treatment, JIA patients, carriers of the CC genotype, showed significantly higher plasma CAT activity (p = 0.004) and achieved the JIA ACR 70 response more often (p = 0.003) than the patients, carriers of the CT/TT genotype. This is the first study implying the possible association of CAT-262C/T polymorphism with JIA. The results suggest the potential protective effect of the CC genotype, with regard to CAT activity and treatment outcome.

Comparative analysis of the etanercept efficacy in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis under the age of 4 years and children of older age groups using the propensity score matching method

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETA) in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) under the age of 4 years and to compare the data with those for older age groups. Methods: Three groups comprising 34 patients each (total of 102 patients) were selected using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. The study group (patients under the age of 4 years; the Junior group (JNR)) was compared with patients of the older age groups, adjusted for criteria such as gender, JIA category, JIA severity, and either age at disease onset (the Reference by Age of disease Onset (RAO) group) or disease duration (the Reference by Disease Duration (RDD) group). Results: All three groups showed a good response to ETA therapy. During the follow-up period, only 4 (3.9%) patients failed to reach American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric criteria improvement at ACR50 level. In the JNR group, 82.4% of patients achieved ACR90 within a median time of 3 months (IQR, 3-6 months), which was a better result compared to the other two groups: 61.8% (RAO group) and 58.8% (RDD group) of patients achieved ACR90 within 6 (Interquartile Range (IQR), 3-9) months (p = .028). Three (9%) patients in the JNR group and none of the RDD and RAO groups discontinued treatment because of clinical remission (p = .045). Conclusion: An analysis of the ETA efficacy in different age groups comparable in terms of the diagnosis and disease severity demonstrated a higher efficacy of earlier ETA therapy in children of the same age at disease onset. In children at the early stage of arthritis (≤ 2.5 years long), ETA was more efficient in those with an earlier disease onset.

ETANERCEPT TREATMENT RESULTS IN CHILDREN WITH NON-SYSTEMIC JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS: REMISSION, RECRUDESCENCE, AND ADVERSE EVENTS. RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Background.Etanercept is a biological drug most commonly used in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The results of its use are showed in local studies.

Objective.Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of etanercept in children with non-systemic JIA, to determine the predictors of remission and the risk factors for the development of exacerbations.

Methods.In a retrospective cohort study, the results of etanercept treatment (remission, exacerbations, adverse events) in children with non-systemic JIA were analyzed. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months.

Results.The period of remission within 6–36 months occurred in 77/131 (58.8%), exacerbations developed in 18/129 (14.0%) patients. Predictors of achieving remission were the age of JIA onset < 8 years [relative risk (RR) 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27–3.23], the age of prescribing etanercept ≤ 10 years (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.22–2.38), the time of the disease prior to etanercept prescription < 2.5 years (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.4), the presence of HLA-B27 antigen (RR 2.15, 95% CI 0.98–4.75; p = 0.06). The risk of exacerbations was higher in children with polyarticular JIA (RR 2.7, 95% CI 0.9–8.2; p = 0.08), whereas methotrexate therapy reduced the risk of exacerbations (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.1–1.15; p = 0.05). Etanercept was discontinued due to primary (improvement by the ACRpedi criteria after 3 months of therapy <30%) or secondary (loss of previously achieved ≥ 30% improvement) failure in 14/152 (9.2%) patients; de novo uveitis developed in 8/152 (5.3%) patients; reactions at the injection site — in 6/152 (4.0%) patients.

Conclusion.Therapy involving etanercept is more likely to induce remission in younger patients with JIA onset at the age of 8 years and a history of less than 2.5 years. A high risk of exacerbations was noted in patients with polyarticular JIA, and low one — in those receiving methotrexate as a part of combined therapy.