1
|
Rabey M, Slater H, Hebron C, Moloney N. Societal beliefs about pain may be more balanced than previously thought. Results of the Guernsey pain survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:72. [PMID: 38238802 PMCID: PMC10795459 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07088-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal pain is multidimensional and associated with significant societal impact. Persistent or chronic pain is a public health priority. A step towards high-value care is a contemporary understanding of pain. While pain-related knowledge has been examined in specific conditions (e.g. neck pain) knowledge of the public's broader understanding regarding musculoskeletal pain per se, warrants investigation. This study examined the public's knowledge and beliefs regarding musculoskeletal pain and pain management. METHODS This observational cohort study was conducted in Guernsey (January 2019-February 2020). Participants (n = 1656; 76.0% female) completed an online questionnaire capturing: demographics, pain experience, work absenteeism, understanding of pain and pain management, multidimensional influences, physical activity, pain catastrophising and healthcare decision-making. Statements were deemed true/false/equivocal and mapped to biopsychosocial/biomedical/neutral perspectives based upon contemporary literature. Descriptive statistics were analysed for each statement. Participants' responses were examined for alignment to a contemporary viewpoint and themes within responses derived using a semi-quantitative approach modelled on direct content analysis. Comparisons between participants with/without pain were examined (χ2-squared/Wilcoxon Rank Sum test). RESULTS Within the cohort 83.6% reported currently experiencing pain. The overarching theme was perspectives that reflected both biomedical and contemporary, multidimensional understandings of pain. Sub-themes included uncertainty about pain persistence and evidence-based means to reduce recurrence, and reliance upon healthcare professionals for guiding decision-making. Compared to those with pain, those without had a greater belief that psychological interventions may help and lower pain catastrophising. CONCLUSIONS Participants' understanding of pain demonstrated both biomedical and multidimensional pain understanding consistent with elements of a contemporary understanding of pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Rabey
- Thrive Physiotherapy, St. Martin, Guernsey.
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Kent St. Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
| | - Helen Slater
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Kent St. Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia
- enAble Institute, Curtin University, Kent St. Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia
| | - Clair Hebron
- School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Thrive Physiotherapy, St. Martin, Guernsey
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Kent St. Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Myhrvold BL, Vøllestad NK, Irgens P, Robinson HS, Axén I. Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study. Chiropr Man Therap 2023; 31:33. [PMID: 37653398 PMCID: PMC10472687 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00507-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chiropractors' clinical indicators for recommending preventive continued care to patients with low back pain include previous pain episodes, a history of long pain duration and improvement after initial treatment. Our objectives were, in a cohort of patients with neck pain, to examine whether these clinical indicators were associated with being recommended continued care beyond 4 weeks, and if so whether this recommendation was dependent of chiropractor characteristics, as well as if the number of clinical indicators influenced this recommendation. METHODS In this multi-center observational study, 172 patients seeking care for a new episode of neck pain in chiropractic practice in Norway were included between September 2015 and May 2016. The chiropractors treated their patients as per usual, and for this study, baseline data and 4-week follow-up data were used. Patient data included the clinical indicators (1) previous episodes of neck pain, (2) a history of long duration neck pain and (3) improvement four weeks after initial treatment. The recruiting chiropractors were asked at 4-week follow-up if each patient was recommended continued care, defined as care planned beyond the first 4 weeks. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models investigated the association between clinical indicators and the continued care recommendation, as well as the influence of chiropractor characteristics on this recommendation. Cross tabulations investigated the relationship between the number of indicators present and recommendation of continued care. RESULTS Long duration of neck pain was the strongest clinical indicator for being recommended continued care 4 weeks after the initial treatment. Chiropractor characteristics were not associated with this recommendation. In patients with all three clinical indicators present, 39% were recommended continued care. When two and one indicators were present, the percentages of those recommended continued care were 25% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION Chiropractors recommended continued care for patients experiencing neck pain based on their history of long pain duration, and this was not influenced by characteristics of the chiropractor. This differs from previous studies of indicators for maintenance care in patients with low back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgitte Lawaetz Myhrvold
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
- Et Liv I Bevegelse (ELiB), The Norwegian Chiropractic Research Foundation, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Nina K Vøllestad
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pernille Irgens
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Stendal Robinson
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
| | - Iben Axén
- Et Liv I Bevegelse (ELiB), The Norwegian Chiropractic Research Foundation, Oslo, Norway
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Myhrvold BL, Vikhaug TB, DuRose A, Gausel AM, Eklund A, Axén I. Evidence-based maintenance care among chiropractors in Norway: a cross-sectional survey in the Nordic maintenance care program. Chiropr Man Therap 2023; 31:26. [PMID: 37563673 PMCID: PMC10416359 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00502-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chiropractors use a treatment strategy called maintenance care with the intent of secondary and tertiary prevention. The Nordic Maintenance Care Program provides evidence of when and for whom maintenance care should be offered. Dissemination has occurred through articles, workshops, social media, conference in Europe and internationally. However, little is known about chiropractors' awareness and use of this evidence. This study explores chiropractors' attitudes, skills, and use of evidence on maintenance care, as well as study their association with general evidence-based practice and demographic characteristics. Moreover, barriers and facilitators of evidence access are also examined. METHODS Questions pertaining our research aim were included in the anonymous and digital Evidence-Based practice Attitude and utilization SurvEy, which was distributed to all members (n = 770) of the Norwegian chiropractic association in the fall of 2021. RESULTS The response rate was 41% (n = 312). Regarding attitudes towards evidence-based maintenance care, 26% agreed they needed tools to recommend this care to patients. Approximately half (57%) believed they had skills to identify suitable patients, and 45% had used published information in the past month. Strong alignment was observed between Norwegian chiropractors' attitudes, skills, and utilization of evidence-based maintenance care and general evidence-based practice. Maintenance care skills were significantly associated with age (those between 40 and 59 years being less likely to report having high skills), clinical setting (those working with conventional health care providers being less likely to report having high skills) and country of education (those educated in the US and Australia being more likely to report having high skills). Moreover, maintenance care use was significantly associated with country of education (those educated in Australia were less likely to have used published information regarding patient selection for maintenance care). Access to resources was a barrier, whereas knowledge of patient suitability facilitated evidence-based maintenance care. CONCLUSIONS Norwegian chiropractors had neutral attitudes towards maintenance care, but generally reported moderate skills. Most had not used evidence about maintenance care in the previous month. Access to useful resources about the evidence regarding maintenance care was a barrier, and knowledge of who responds to maintenance care was a facilitator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgitte Lawaetz Myhrvold
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1089, 0317 Oslo, Norway
- Et Liv I Bevegelse, The Norwegian Chiropractic Research Foundation, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Alister DuRose
- AECC University College, Parkwood Campus, Parkwood Road, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Anne Marie Gausel
- Et Liv I Bevegelse, The Norwegian Chiropractic Research Foundation, Oslo, Norway
- Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department for Caring and Ethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Andreas Eklund
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels Väg 13, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Iben Axén
- Et Liv I Bevegelse, The Norwegian Chiropractic Research Foundation, Oslo, Norway
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels Väg 13, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prevention-Focused Care: The Potential Role of Chiropractors in Hong Kong’s Primary Healthcare Transformation. Cureus 2023; 15:e36950. [PMID: 37009374 PMCID: PMC10064816 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Hong Kong's healthcare system is moving toward preventive and primary care to address the complicated demands of the aging population. Chiropractic professionals are in an advantageous position to support a prevention-focused strategy by identifying musculoskeletal problems early, reducing risks, and promoting healthy lifestyles. This article examines how the involvement of chiropractors in public health programs could improve population health in Hong Kong and boost primary care. The inclusion of chiropractors in district health centers and other initiatives would offer safer and more cost-effective choices for treating functional problems and chronic pain. Chiropractors should be involved in policymakers' attempts to create a sustainable healthcare system that meets Hong Kong's long-term healthcare requirements.
Collapse
|
5
|
Chiropractic Care in a Patient With Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia and Chronic Pain. Cureus 2023; 15:e36602. [PMID: 36968681 PMCID: PMC10037221 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder, which is challenging to diagnose and is known to be associated with more than 73 genes. Neurodegenerative disorders are characterized by progressive spasticity and weakness of the lower limbs. Here, we report the case of a 13-year-old girl with a history of HSP who presented to a chiropractic clinic with chronic low back pain and rehabilitation for lower extremity weakness. She had been receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and baclofen for spasticity. Full-spine radiography revealed borderline acetabular dysplasia in the right hip. After nine months of chiropractic therapy, the patient reported reduced lower extremity spasticity and pain as well as improved strength and functionality. As non-invasive therapies have minimal side effects, chiropractic therapy can be used alongside or in combination with other treatments as an additional option for the long-term management of HSP.
Collapse
|
6
|
Avoiding nocebo and other undesirable effects in chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy: An invitation to reflect. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 62:102677. [PMID: 36368170 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While the placebo effect is increasingly recognised as a contributor to treatment effects in clinical practice, the nocebo and other undesirable effects are less well explored and likely underestimated. In the chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professions, some aspects of historical models of care may arguably increase the risk of nocebo effects. PURPOSE In this masterclass article, clinicians, researchers, and educators are invited to reflect on such possibilities, in an attempt to stimulate research and raise awareness for the mitigation of such undesirable effects. IMPLICATIONS This masterclass briefly introduces the nocebo effect and its underlying mechanisms. It then traces the historical development of chiropractic, osteopathy, and physiotherapy, arguing that there was and continues to be an excessive focus on the patient's body. Next, aspects of clinical practice, including communication, the therapeutic relationship, clinical rituals, and the wider social and economic context of practice are examined for their potential to generate nocebo and other undesirable effects. To aid reflection, a model to reflect on clinical practice and individual professions through the 'prism' of nocebo and other undesirable effects is introduced and illustrated. Finally, steps are proposed for how researchers, educators, and practitioners can maximise positive and minimise negative clinical context.
Collapse
|
7
|
Eindhoven E, Lee A, Stilwell P, Mior S. I expected to be pain free: a qualitative study exploring athletes' expectations and experiences of care received by sports chiropractors. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:21. [PMID: 35501876 PMCID: PMC9059405 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00426-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Knowledge about patient satisfaction and experience with care they receive can guide practitioners in establishing doctor-patient relationships and improve health outcomes. Although evidence suggests high patient satisfaction with chiropractic care in general, there is limited understanding of the expectations and experiences of athletes receiving sports chiropractic care.
Objective To explore the athletes’ expectations and experiences with care received from sports chiropractors, and their perceptions of relevant areas of future research.
Methods A qualitative study was conducted through an interpretivist lens exploring the perspectives of elite and competitive athletes receiving care from sports chiropractors in Canada. Participants were purposively recruited and interviewed until saturation was reached. Two research team members independently analyzed the interview transcripts using a conventional approach to content analysis. Content was inductively coded and discussed by the research team to generate categories.
Results We interviewed 18 participants between December 2018 and March 2020, 14 were national level athletes participating in sports ranging from paddling to combat sports. Reported reasons for seeking care included acute care, injury prevention, enhancing performance and maintenance care. Generated categories were organized under topics of experience with care, expectations of care, and research agenda. Participants experienced a variety of interventions, reassurance, varying treatment times, and reported positive impact on their athletic performance. They expected musculoskeletal assessment and treatment including at and beyond the injury site, symptom improvement, good communication and expertise from the chiropractor. Some participants suggested interpersonal and interprofessional communication can be improved, in particular the level of collaboration with other members of their health care team. Overall, participants reported a high level of trust and satisfaction with care received from sports chiropractors. From our participants’ perspective, suggested areas of research should focus on injury mechanics and prevention, impact of care on performance, and interprofessional collaboration. Conclusions In general, participants were very satisfied with care. Overall, participants’ expectations and experiences aligned but changed over time. Addressing the findings of this study can be used to enhance the quality of care provided to athletes from sports chiropractors, as well as inform future research agendas. Further work assessing if athletes in other competitive levels have similar experiences and expectations is needed. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-022-00426-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Eindhoven
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.
| | - Alex Lee
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Peter Stilwell
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research at, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Eklund A, Palmgren PJ, Jakobsson U, Axén I. Development and evaluation of the MAINTAIN instrument, selecting patients suitable for secondary or tertiary preventive manual care: the Nordic maintenance care program. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:15. [PMID: 35300729 PMCID: PMC8932000 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00424-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chiropractic maintenance care (MC) has been found to be effective for patients classified as dysfunctional by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI). Although displaying good psychometric properties, the instrument was not designed to be used in clinical practice to screen patients for stratified care pathways. The aim was to develop a brief clinical instrument with the intent of identifying dysfunctional patients with acceptable diagnostic accuracy. Methods Data from 249 patients with a complete MPI dataset from a randomized clinical trial that investigated the effect and cost-effectiveness of MC with a 12-month follow-up was used in this cross-sectional analysis. A brief screening instrument was developed to identify dysfunctional patients, with a summary measure. Different cut-offs were considered with regards to diagnostic accuracy using the original instrument’s classification of dysfunctional patients as a reference. Very good diagnostic accuracy was defined as an area under the curve (AUC) metric between 0.8 and 0.9. The instrument was then externally validated in 3 other existing datasets to assess model transportability across populations and medical settings.
Results Using an explorative approach, the MAINTAIN instrument with 10 questions (0–6 Likert responses) capturing 5 dimensions (pain severity, interference, life control, affective distress, and support) was developed, generating an algorithm-based score ranging from − 12 to 48. Reporting a MAINTAIN score of 18 or higher, 146 out of the 249 patients were classified as dysfunctional with 95.8% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity. At a score of 22 or higher, 109/249 were classified as dysfunctional with 81.1% sensitivity and 79.2% specificity. AUC was estimated to 0.87 (95% CI 0.83, 0.92) and Youden’s index was highest (0.70) at a score of 20. The diagnostic accuracy was similar and high across populations with minor differences in optimal thresholds for identifying dysfunctional individuals.
Conclusion The MAINTAIN instrument has very good diagnostic accuracy with regards to identifying dysfunctional patients and may be used as a decision aid in clinical practice. By using 2 thresholds, patients can be categorized into “low probability (− 12 to 17)”, “moderate probability (18 to 21)”, and “high probability (22 to 48)” of having a good outcome from maintenance care for low back pain. Trial registration Clinical trials.gov; NCT01539863; registered February 28, 2012; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01539863. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-022-00424-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Eklund
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, The Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Per J Palmgren
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulf Jakobsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Iben Axén
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, The Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The chiropractic profession is 125 years old and has evolved a culture beset with internal conflict. The internal ructions have been particularly noticeable during the last 20 years. The recent resignation of the entire World Federation of Chiropractic Research Committee has again focussed the conflicting views and goals of the “wellness” and “evidence” factions within the profession. These polarising viewpoints are worsening to the degree that there are calls for the profession to break into two separate entities. Key to the recognition of the differences within the profession is the recognition of title for particular sub populations of patients presenting to chiropractors. For many of the sub populations such as sport or paediatrics there has grown appropriate post professional specialist educational training sometimes leading to a protected title. However, this is not occurring in that group of practitioners that choose to focus on wellness care. A recommendation is made that wellness chiropractic be viewed as a post professional specialty program within chiropractic, as it is in medicine and elsewhere, and that recognition follow after appropriate post professional educational programs have been completed, as is customary in the other special interest groups. In order to do so, consensus will be required from all stakeholders within the profession on the level, scope and depth of such programs. Furthermore, it is possible that different jurisdictions around the world may require different post graduate educational levels based on local competitive, legal and professional circumstances. In such cases, transitioning to the higher level over a period of time may be undertaken. Recognition of the wellness specialty by the profession would allow for vertical integration with other healthcare providers as well as help bridge a gap between the entrepreneur and academic groups that would be responsible for creating these programs at tertiary education institutions. Finally, should these programs acquire evidence to underpin them, a process that would be taught within the programs, it is likely that recognition of an extended scope of practice would occur increasing the appeal of chiropractic to the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Pollard
- Department of Chiropractic, School of Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Brisbane, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hjertstrand J, Palmgren PJ, Axén I, Eklund A. The nordic maintenance care program: patient experience of maintenance care-a qualitative study. Chiropr Man Therap 2021; 29:28. [PMID: 34340692 PMCID: PMC8327445 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-021-00388-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Low back pain is one of the major causes of disability world-wide. Most back pain sufferers experience pain that is recurrent or persistent, making management of this condition a priority. In a series of previous studies, chiropractic maintenance care has been found to be an effective way of reducing the number of days with pain, particularly for patients with a certain psychological profile. However, little is known about patients’ experience of this kind of management plan. This study aimed to explore patient experiences and preferences by looking at barriers to and facilitators of engaging in and maintaining a care plan, and to contrast the data using psychological sub-groups. Methods In this qualitative study we performed semi-structured interviews with 24 patients who had previously participated in a Swedish trial evaluating maintenance care. They were purposefully selected to obtain richness, variation and breadth of data. The data were analyzed using inductive qualitative manifest and latent content analysis. We used the theory of planned behavior to deepen our understanding of the constructed themes. Results The analysis resulted in two overarching dimensions: “when maintenance care is of high value” and “when maintenance care is of low value”. Four factors were jointly identified as obstacles to maintenance care by patients in all the psychological subgroups. These factors were: Cost demanding, A sense of low value, Perceived as unavailable and Fear of treatment. The one factor seen as facilitating maintenance care by patients in all the subgroups was Care that is patient-centered. Conclusions The findings reveal a variance of both positive and negative experiences of MC in the psychological subgroups. These findings can deepen our understanding of how patients experience MC and can help clinicians to understand when patients might regard maintenance care as being of high value.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-021-00388-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesper Hjertstrand
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Solna, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per J Palmgren
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska huset, Tomtebodavägen 18A, Solna, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Iben Axén
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Solna, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.,ELIB, The Norwegian Chiropractic Research Foundation, Et liv i bevegelse, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Eklund
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Solna, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hawk C, Amorin-Woods L, Evans MW, Whedon JM, Daniels CJ, Williams RD, Parkin-Smith G, Taylor DN, Anderson D, Farabaugh R, Walters SA, Schielke A, Minkalis AL, Crivelli LS, Alpers C, Hinkeldey N, Hoang J, Caraway D, Whalen W, Cook J, Redwood D. The Role of Chiropractic Care in Providing Health Promotion and Clinical Preventive Services for Adult Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline. J Altern Complement Med 2021; 27:850-867. [PMID: 34314609 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2021.0184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To develop evidence-based recommendations on best practices for delivery of clinical preventive services by chiropractors and to offer practical resources to empower provider applications in practice. Design: Clinical practice guideline based on evidence-based recommendations of a panel of practitioners and experts on clinical preventive services. Methods: Synthesizing the results of a literature search for relevant clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews, a multidisciplinary steering committee with training and experience in health promotion, clinical prevention, and/or evidence-based chiropractic practice drafted a set of recommendations. A Delphi panel of experienced practitioners and faculty, primarily but not exclusively chiropractors, rated the recommendations by using the formal consensus methodology established by the RAND Corporation/University of California. Results: The Delphi consensus process was conducted during January-February 2021. The 65-member Delphi panel reached a high level of consensus on appropriate application of clinical preventive services for screening and health promotion counseling within the chiropractic scope of practice. Interprofessional collaboration for the successful delivery of clinical preventive services was emphasized. Recommendations were made on primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary prevention of musculoskeletal pain. Conclusions: Application of this guideline in chiropractic practice may facilitate consistent and appropriate use of screening and preventive services and foster interprofessional collaboration to promote clinical preventive services and contribute to improved public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Hawk
- Texas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, Texas, USA
| | | | - Marion W Evans
- University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA
| | - James M Whedon
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Derek Anderson
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System American Lake Division, Tacoma, Washington, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jason Cook
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cerritelli F, Lunghi C, Esteves J, Vaucher P, van Dun P, Alvarez G, Biberschick M, Wagner A, Merdy O, Menard M, Tavernier P, Clouzeau C, Risch A, Ruffini N, Nunes A, Santiago R, Marett P, Grech R, Thomson O. Osteopathy: Italian professional profile. A professional commentary by a group of experts of the European community of practice. INT J OSTEOPATH MED 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Hartvigsen J, French SD. So, what is chiropractic? Summary and reflections on a series of papers in Chiropractic and Manual Therapies. Chiropr Man Therap 2020; 28:4. [PMID: 32000811 PMCID: PMC6990530 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-019-0295-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This commentary brings the 2017–2019 thematic series What is Chiropractic? to a close. The 18 papers published in the series contribute to a better understanding of what chiropractic is, where chiropractors practice and function, who seeks their care, what chiropractors do, and how they interact with other healthcare professionals. Several papers in the series highlighted deeply rooted disagreements within chiropractic about fundamental issues pertaining to ideology, acceptance of scientific evidence as the basis for clinical practice and the future of chiropractic. If the chiropractic profession is to remain relevant in today’s evidence-based healthcare environment, there is an urgent for the profession to undertake further research to describe what chiropractic is, what chiropractors do, and provide evidence for the value of these activities to patients and healthcare decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark. .,Nordic Institute of Chiropractic, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Axén I, Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C. Correction to: Chiropractic maintenance care - what's new? A systematic review of the literature. Chiropr Man Therap 2020; 28:11. [PMID: 32000808 PMCID: PMC6986102 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-020-0301-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Iben Axén
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Nobels väg 13, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Et Liv I Bevegelse (The Norwegian Chiropractic Research Foundation), Storgt 10a, 0155, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Lise Hestbaek
- Deptartment of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark.,Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
- Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|