1
|
Akiba CF, Go VF, Powell BJ, Muessig K, Golin C, Dussault JM, Zimba CC, Matewere M, Mbota M, Thom A, Masa C, Malava JK, Gaynes BN, Masiye J, Udedi M, Hosseinipour M, Pence BW. Champion and audit and feedback strategy fidelity and their relationship to depression intervention fidelity: A mixed method study. SSM - MENTAL HEALTH 2023; 3:100194. [PMID: 37485235 PMCID: PMC10358176 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, mental health disorders rank as the greatest cause of disability. Low and middle-income countries (LMICs) hold a disproportionate share of the mental health burden, especially as it pertains to depression. Depression is highly prevalent among those with non-communicable diseases (NCDs), creating a barrier to successful treatment. While some treatments have proven efficacy in LMIC settings, wide dissemination is challenged by multiple factors, leading researchers to call for implementation strategies to overcome barriers to care provision. However, implementation strategies are often not well defined or documented, challenging the interpretation of study results and the uptake and replication of strategies in practice settings. Assessing implementation strategy fidelity (ISF), or the extent to which a strategy was implemented as designed, overcomes these challenges. This study assessed fidelity of two implementation strategies (a 'basic' champion strategy and an 'enhanced' champion + audit and feedback strategy) to improve the integration of a depression intervention, measurement based care (MBC), at 10 NCD clinics in Malawi. The primary goal of this study was to assess the relationship between the implementation strategies and MBC fidelity using a mixed methods approach. Methods We developed a theory-informed mixed methods fidelity assessment that first combined an implementation strategy specification technique with a fidelity framework. We then created corresponding fidelity indicators to strategy components. Clinical process data and one-on-one in-depth interviews with 45 staff members at 6 clinics were utilized as data sources. Our final analysis used descriptive statistics, reflexive-thematic analysis (RTA), data merging, and triangulation to examine the relationship between ISF and MBC intervention fidelity. Results Our mixed methods analysis revealed how ISF may moderate the relationship between the strategies and MBC fidelity. Leadership engagement and implementation climate were critical for clinics to overcome implementation barriers and preserve implementation strategy and MBC fidelity. Descriptive statistics determined champion strategy fidelity to range from 61 to 93% across the 10 clinics. Fidelity to the audit and feedback strategy ranged from 82 to 91% across the 5 clinics assigned to that condition. MBC fidelity ranged from 54 to 95% across all clinics. Although correlations between ISF and MBC fidelity were not statistically significant due to the sample of 10 clinics, associations were in the expected direction and of moderate effect size. A coefficient for shared depression screening among clinicians had greater face validity compared to depression screening coverage and functioned as a proximal indicator of implementation strategy success. Conclusion Fidelity to the basic and enhanced strategies varied by site and were influenced by leadership engagement and implementation climate. Champion strategies may benefit from the addition of leadership strategies to help address implementation barriers outside the purview of champions. ISF may moderate the relationship between strategies and implementation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher F. Akiba
- RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA
| | - Vivian F. Go
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill 135 Dauer Drive, 302 Rosenau Hall, CB #7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| | - Byron J. Powell
- Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, MSC 1196-251-46, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Kate Muessig
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill 135 Dauer Drive, 302 Rosenau Hall, CB #7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| | - Carol Golin
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill 135 Dauer Drive, 302 Rosenau Hall, CB #7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| | - Josée M. Dussault
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7435, USA
| | - Chifundo C. Zimba
- UNC Project-Malawi, Tidziwe Centre, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Maureen Matewere
- UNC Project-Malawi, Tidziwe Centre, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - MacDonald Mbota
- UNC Project-Malawi, Tidziwe Centre, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Annie Thom
- UNC Project-Malawi, Tidziwe Centre, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Cecilia Masa
- UNC Project-Malawi, Tidziwe Centre, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Jullita K. Malava
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit (MEIRU), P.O. Box 46, Chilumba, Karonga District, Malawi
| | - Bradley N. Gaynes
- Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, UNC School of Medicine, 101 Manning Dr # 1, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Jones Masiye
- Malawi Ministry of Health and Population, Non-communicable Diseases and Mental Health Clinical Services, P.O Box 30377, Lilongwe, 3, Malawi
| | - Michael Udedi
- Malawi Ministry of Health and Population, Non-communicable Diseases and Mental Health Clinical Services, P.O Box 30377, Lilongwe, 3, Malawi
| | - Mina Hosseinipour
- UNC Project-Malawi, Tidziwe Centre, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Brian W. Pence
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7435, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alcalde-Rabanal JE, Flores-Loera Y, Chivardi C, Ruelas-González MG, Macías N, González-Robledo MC. Evaluation of Health Promotion Program at the Community Level in Mexico: Is the Program Efficient and Effective? JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2023; 29:654-662. [PMID: 37097184 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Health promotion programs have been encouraged in the Americas since 1990. In Mexico, health program promotion at the community level was implemented by the Ministry of Health in 2001 to encourage community health status improvement. Despite the longtime of its implementation, evaluations of its efficiency and effectiveness are scarce. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficiency of the Healthy Environments and Communities Program (HECP) through 2 means: (1) efficiency of the implementation and (2) technical efficiency, as well as to evaluate its effectiveness. SETTING Target communities of the HECP of 32 Mexican states during 2013-2017. The HECP developed community interventions to improve community organization, health behaviors, and family and communitarian sanitation. METHODOLOGY We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the efficiency of HECP implementation and estimated the inclusion of target communities (focalization index), the retention of communities (continuity index), and the desertion of communities in the program (desertion index). To evaluate the adequate use of the program resources (technical efficiency), we used data-enveloped analysis and the Tobit regression model to identify external factors that can influence results. Finally, to evaluate the program's effectiveness, we estimated the index of the communities that improved their health indicators and were certified as healthy (community certification). RESULTS The median rate of focalization was 3.44 (1.31-85.13); the continuity of communities' rate was 0.50 (0.16-2.67). Regarding technical efficiency to reach healthy communities, only 2 states reached the optimal efficiency (score 1); where the efficiency was adjusted for external factors, 6 states reached a score of 1. The median of global effectiveness was 0.19 (0.01-0.78). We found differences in efficiency and effectiveness scores among states. CONCLUSION We found lower efficiency of the implementation and technical efficiency, as well as poor effectiveness of the program to reach healthy communities. To achieve HECP purpose, it is necessary to revise its guidelines, improve its strategies to work in communities, and establish the right mechanisms to monitor its implementation. It is essential to focus on the resources used to enhance technical efficiency and effectiveness at the community level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline E Alcalde-Rabanal
- Center for Health System Research (Drs Alcalde-Rabanal and González-Robledo), Center for Evaluation and Survey (Dr Ruelas-González), and Center for Nutrition and Health Research (Ms Macías), Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, England (Mr Chivardi); and Instituto de Seguridad Social y Salud de Trabajadores del Estado, Cancún, Q.R., Mexico (Ms Flores-Loera)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta A, Hu J, Huang S, Diaz L, Gore R, Levy N, Bergman M, Tanner M, Sherman SE, Islam N, Schwartz MD. Implementation fidelity to a behavioral diabetes prevention intervention in two New York City safety net primary care practices. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:575. [PMID: 36978071 PMCID: PMC10045092 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15477-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is critical to assess implementation fidelity of evidence-based interventions and factors moderating fidelity, to understand the reasons for their success or failure. However, fidelity and fidelity moderators are seldom systematically reported. The study objective was to conduct a concurrent implementation fidelity evaluation and examine fidelity moderators of CHORD (Community Health Outreach to Reduce Diabetes), a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, controlled trial to test the impact of a Community Health Workers (CHW)-led health coaching intervention to prevent incident type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in New York (NY). METHODS We applied the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity to assess implementation fidelity and factors moderating it across the four core intervention components: patient goal setting, education topic coaching, primary care (PC) visits, and referrals to address social determinants of health (SDH), using descriptive statistics and regression models. PC patients with prediabetes receiving care from safety-net patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) at either, VA NY Harbor or at Bellevue Hospital (BH) were eligible to be randomized into the CHW-led CHORD intervention or usual care. Among 559 patients randomized and enrolled in the intervention group, 79.4% completed the intake survey and were included in the analytic sample for fidelity assessment. Fidelity was measured as coverage, content adherence and frequency of each core component, and the moderators assessed were implementation site and patient activation measure. RESULTS Content adherence was high for three components with nearly 80.0% of patients setting ≥ 1 goal, having ≥ 1 PC visit and receiving ≥ 1 education session. Only 45.0% patients received ≥ 1 SDH referral. After adjusting for patient gender, language, race, ethnicity, and age, the implementation site moderated adherence to goal setting (77.4% BH vs. 87.7% VA), educational coaching (78.9% BH vs. 88.3% VA), number of successful CHW-patient encounters (6 BH vs 4 VA) and percent of patients receiving all four components (41.1% BH vs. 25.7% VA). CONCLUSIONS The fidelity to the four CHORD intervention components differed between the two implementation sites, demonstrating the challenges in implementing complex evidence-based interventions in different settings. Our findings underscore the importance of measuring implementation fidelity in contextualizing the outcomes of randomized trials of complex multi-site behavioral interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 30/12/2016 and the registration number is NCT03006666 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avni Gupta
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, 708 Broadway, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
| | - Jiyuan Hu
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave 2F Rm 222, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Shengnan Huang
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, 2Nd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Laura Diaz
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, 9-43A, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Radhika Gore
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Natalie Levy
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, Area 2d, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Michael Bergman
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, 2Nd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 423 East 23Rd Street, Room 16049C, New York, NY, 10010, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, 423 East 23Rd Street, Room 16049C, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| | - Michael Tanner
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 462 1St Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Scott E Sherman
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Nadia Islam
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Mark D Schwartz
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, Suite 955, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, 180 Madison Avenue, Suite 955, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fernandez Turienzo C, Hull LH, Coxon K, Bollard M, Cross P, Seed PT, Shennan AH, Sandall J. A continuity of care programme for women at risk of preterm birth in the UK: Process evaluation of a hybrid randomised controlled pilot trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0279695. [PMID: 36634125 PMCID: PMC9836307 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development and evaluation of specific maternity care packages designed to address preterm birth remains a public health priority. We aim to evaluate the implementation, context, and potential mechanisms of action, of a new care pathway that combined midwifery continuity of care with a specialist obstetric clinic for women at risk of preterm birth (POPPIE) in London (UK). METHODS We did a multiphase mixed method triangulation evaluation nested within a hybrid type 2, randomised controlled trial in London (United Kingdom). Pregnant women with identified risk factors for preterm birth were eligible for trial participation and randomly assigned (1:1) to either midwifery continuity of care linked to a specialist obstetric clinic (POPPIE group) or standard maternity care. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate and timely interventions for the prevention and/or management of preterm labour and birth, analysed according to intention to treat. Clinical and process outcome data were abstracted from medical records and electronic data systems, and coded by study team members, who were masked to study group allocation. Implementation data were collected from meeting records and key documents, postnatal surveys (n = 164), semi-structured interviews with women (n = 30), healthcare providers and stakeholders (n = 24) pre-, mid and post implementation. Qualitative and quantitative data from meeting records and key documents were examined narratively. Qualitative data from interviews were analysed using three thematic frameworks: Proctor's (for implementation outcomes: appropriateness, adoption, feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, penetration, sustainability), the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (for determinants of implementation), and published program theories of continuity models (for potential mechanisms). Data triangulation followed a convergent parallel and pragmatic approach which brought quantitative and qualitative data together at the interpretation stage. We averaged individual implementation measures across all domains to give a single composite implementation strength score which was compared to the primary outcome. RESULTS Between May 9, 2017, and Sep 30, 2018, 553 women were assessed for eligibility and 334 were enrolled with less than 6% of loss to follow up (169 were assigned to the POPPIE group; 165 were to the standard group). There was no difference in the primary outcome (POPPIE group 83·3% versus standard group 84·7%; risk ratio 0·98 [95% CI 0·90 to 1·08]). Appropriateness and adoption: The introduction of the POPPIE model was perceived as a positive fundamental change for local maternity services. Partnership working and additional funding were crucial for adoption. Fidelity: More than 75% of antenatal and postnatal visits were provided by a named or partner midwife, and a POPPIE midwife was present in more than 80% of births. Acceptability: Nearly 98% of women who responded to the postnatal survey were very satisfied with POPPIE model. Quantitative fidelity and acceptability results were supported by the qualitative findings. Penetration and sustainability: Despite delays (likely associated with lack of existing continuity models at the hospital), the model was embedded within established services and a joint decision was made to sustain and adapt the model after the trial (strongly facilitated by national maternal policy on continuity pathways). Potential mechanisms of impact identified included e.g. access to care, advocacy and perceptions of safety and trust. There was no association between implementation measures and the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS The POPPIE model of care was a feasible and acceptable model of care that was implemented with high fidelity and sustained in maternity services. Larger powered trials are feasible and needed in other settings, to evaluate the impact and implementation of continuity programmes in other communities affected by preterm birth and women who experience social disadvantage and vulnerability. TRIAL REGISTRATION UKCRN Portfolio Database (prospectively registered, 24 April 2017): 31951. ISRCTN registry (retrospectively registered, 21 August 2017): ISRCTN37733900.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Fernandez Turienzo
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Louise H. Hull
- Department of Health Services and Population Research, Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kirstie Coxon
- Department of Midwifery, Kingston University and St. George’s, University of London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Bollard
- Maternity Services, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pauline Cross
- Department of Public Health, London Borough of Lewisham, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul T. Seed
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew H. Shennan
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Sandall
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fixsen DL, Van Dyke MK, Blase KA. Repeated measures of implementation variables. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1085859. [PMID: 36926497 PMCID: PMC10012800 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1085859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
It is commonly acknowledged that implementation work is long-term and contextual in nature and often takes years to accomplish. Repeated measures are needed to study the trajectory of implementation variables over time. To be useful in typical practice settings, measures that are relevant, sensitive, consequential, and practical are needed to inform planning and action. If implementation independent variables and implementation dependent variables are to contribute to a science of implementation, then measures that meet these criteria must be established. This exploratory review was undertaken to "see what is being done" to evaluate implementation variables and processes repeatedly in situations where achieving outcomes was the goal (i.e., more likely to be consequential). No judgement was made about the adequacy of the measure (e.g., psychometric properties) in the review. The search process resulted in 32 articles that met the criteria for a repeated measure of an implementation variable. 23 different implementation variables were the subject of repeated measures. The broad spectrum of implementation variables identified in the review included innovation fidelity, sustainability, organization change, and scaling along with training, implementation teams, and implementation fidelity. Given the long-term complexities involved in providing implementation supports to achieve the full and effective use of innovations, repeated measurements of relevant variables are needed to promote a more complete understanding of implementation processes and outcomes. Longitudinal studies employing repeated measures that are relevant, sensitive, consequential, and practical should become common if the complexities involved in implementation are to be understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean L Fixsen
- Active Implementation Research Network, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Melissa K Van Dyke
- Active Implementation Research Network, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Karen A Blase
- Active Implementation Research Network, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haring M, Freigang F, Amelung V, Gersch M. What can healthcare systems learn from looking at tensions in innovation processes? A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1299. [PMID: 36307839 PMCID: PMC9617372 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08626-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Until now, scholarship on innovation processes in healthcare systems lack an in-depth appreciation of tensions. Tensions often revolve around barriers and result from individual assessments and prioritizations that guide actions to eventually overcome these barriers. In order to develop a more differentiated understanding of tensions’ role in healthcare innovation processes, this paper aims to shed light on the multifaceted ways in which tensions emerge, are being dealt with, and how they hinder or, at times, facilitate innovation processes. Methods A systematic review of published and grey literature was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The review involved searching three databases for original research articles and manually searching citations. Twenty-nine original full texts were identified, evaluated, and coded. These include papers on innovation in healthcare systems that investigated innovation-related organizational tensions. The findings were synthesized into different types of tensions in healthcare system innovation and the descriptions of the conflicting elements. We also analyzed the investigated innovations by type, process stages, and across different countries and healthcare systems. Results A total of forty-two tensions were identified and grouped into nine categories. Organizing tensions were predominant, followed by learning/belonging, performing, and performing/organizing tensions. Tensions most frequently occurred in the implementation phase and in the form of a dilemma. Included studies were conducted mainly in government-funded healthcare systems. Conclusion Our data suggest that innovation processes in healthcare systems are impaired by conflicts between contradictory elements, working cultures, and convictions and the organizational and regulatory context. Since the majority of the tensions we collected in our study can be addressed, future policy-making and research should take advantage of this fact and develop strategies that significantly influence the successful management of tensions and thus improve the implementation of innovations.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kühn L, Kronsteiner D, Kaufmann-Kolle P, Andres E, Szecsenyi J, Wensing M, Poss-Doering R. Implementation fidelity in a multifaceted program to foster rational antibiotics use in primary care: an observational study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:243. [PMID: 36123597 PMCID: PMC9487096 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01725-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ARena study (Sustainable Reduction of Antimicrobial Resistance in German Ambulatory Care) is a three-arm, cluster randomized trial to evaluate a multifaceted implementation program in a German primary care setting. In the context of a prospective process evaluation conducted alongside ARena, this study aimed to document and explore fidelity of the implementation program. METHODS This observational study is based on data generated in a three-wave survey of 312 participating physicians in the ARena program and attendance documentation. Measures concerned persistence of participation in the ARena program and adherence to intervention components (thematic quality circles, e-learning, basic expenditure reimbursements, additional bonus payments and a computerized decision support system). Participants' views on five domains of the implementation were also measured. Binary logistic and multiple linear regression analyses were used to explore which views on the implementation were associated with participants' adherence to quality circles and use of additional bonus compensation. RESULTS The analysis of fidelity showed overall high persistence of participation in the intervention components across the three intervention arms (90,1%; 97,9%; 92,9%). 96.4% of planned quality circles were delivered to study participants and, across waves, 30.4% to 93% of practices participated; 56.1% of physicians attended the maximum of four quality circles. 84% of the practices (n = 158) with a minimum of one index patient received a performance-based additional bonus payment at least once. In total, bonus compensation was triggered for 51.8% of affected patients. Participation rate for e-learning (a prerequisite for reimbursement of project-related expenditure) covered 90.8% of practices across all intervention arms, with the highest rate in arm II (96.5%). Uptake of expenditure reimbursement was heterogeneous across study arms, with a mean rate of 86.5% (89.1% in arm I, 96.4% in arm II and 74.1% in arm III). Participants' views regarding participant responsiveness (OR = 2.298) 95% CI [1.598, 3.305] and Context (OR = 2.146) 95% CI [1.135, 4.055] affected additional bonus payment. Participants' views on participant responsiveness (Beta = 0.718) 95% CI [0.479, 0.957], Context (Beta = 0.323) 95% CI [0.055, 0.590] and Culture of shared decision-making (Beta = -0.334) 95% CI [-0.614, -0.053] affected quality circle attendance. CONCLUSION This study showed an overall high fidelity to the implementation program. Participants' views on the implementation were associated with degree of intervention fidelity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN58150046.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Kühn
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dorothea Kronsteiner
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Edith Andres
- aQua Institut, Maschmuehlenweg 8-10, 37073, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,aQua Institut, Maschmuehlenweg 8-10, 37073, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Regina Poss-Doering
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Joyce A, Moussa B, Elmes A, Campbell P, Suchowerska R, Buick F, Barraket J, Carey G. Organisational structures and processes for health and well-being: insights from work integration social enterprise. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1624. [PMID: 36030204 PMCID: PMC9419331 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13920-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous research on employee well-being for those who have experienced social and economic disadvantage and those with previous or existing mental health conditions has focused mainly on programmatic interventions. The purpose of this research was to examine how organisational structures and processes (such as policies and culture) influence well-being of employees from these types of backgrounds. Methods A case study ethnographic approach which included in-depth qualitative analysis of 93 semi-structured interviews of employees, staff, and managers, together with participant observation of four social enterprises employing young people. Results The data revealed that young people were provided a combination of training, varied work tasks, psychosocial support, and encouragement to cultivate relationships among peers and management staff. This was enabled through the following elements: structure and space; funding, finance and industry orientation; organisational culture; policy and process; and fostering local service networks.. The findings further illustrate how organisational structures at these workplaces promoted an inclusive workplace environment in which participants self-reported a decrease in anxiety and depression, increased self-esteem, increased self-confidence and increased physical activity. Conclusions Replicating these types of organisational structures, processes, and culture requires consideration of complex systems perspectives on implementation fidelity which has implications for policy, practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Joyce
- Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
| | - Batool Moussa
- Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Aurora Elmes
- Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Perri Campbell
- Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Roksolana Suchowerska
- Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Fiona Buick
- School of Business, University of New South Wales, Northcott Drive, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
| | - Jo Barraket
- Melbourne Social Equity Institute, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Gemma Carey
- Centre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, 704, Level 7, Science Engineering Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van der Woude LHV, Houdijk HJP, Janssen TWJ, Seves B, Schelhaas R, Plaggenmarsch C, Mouton NLJ, Dekker R, van Keeken H, de Groot S, Vegter RJK. Rehabilitation: mobility, exercise & sports; a critical position stand on current and future research perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 43:3476-3491. [PMID: 32805152 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1806365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human movement, rehabilitation, and allied sciences have embraced their ambitions within the cycle of "RehabMove" congresses over the past 30 years. This combination of disciplines and collaborations in the Netherlands has tried to provide answers to questions in the fields of rehabilitation and adapted sports, while simultaneously generating new questions and challenges. These research questions help us to further deepen our understanding of (impaired) human movement and functioning, with and without supportive technologies, and stress the importance of continued multidisciplinary (inter)national collaboration. METHODS This position stand provides answers that were conceived by the authors in a creative process underlining the preparation of the 6th RehabMove Congress. RESULTS The take-home message of the RehabMove2018 Congress is a plea for continued multidisciplinary research in the fields of rehabilitation and adapted sports. This should be aimed at more individualized notions of human functioning, practice, and training, but also of performance, improved supportive technology, and appropriate "human and technology asset management" at both individual and organization levels and over the lifespan. CONCLUSIONS With this, we anticipate to support the development of rehabilitation sciences and technology and to stimulate the use of rehabilitation notions in general health care. We also hope to help ensure a stronger embodiment of preventive and lifestyle medicine in rehabilitation practice. Indeed, general health care and rehabilitation practice require a healthy and active lifestyle management and research agenda in the context of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONContinued multidisciplinary (international) collaboration will stimulate the development of rehabilitation and human movement sciences.Notions from "human and technology asset management and ergonomics" are fundamental to rehabilitation practice and research.The rehabilitation concept will further merge into general health care and the quality there-off.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas H V van der Woude
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Han J P Houdijk
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Research & Development, Heliomare Rehabilitation Center, Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas W J Janssen
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Research Institute MOVE, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bregje Seves
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Reslin Schelhaas
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Corien Plaggenmarsch
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Noor L J Mouton
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rienk Dekker
- Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Helco van Keeken
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja de Groot
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Research Institute MOVE, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Riemer J K Vegter
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fuentes-Rivera E, Heredia-Pi I, Andrade-Romo Z, Alcalde-Rabanal J, Bravo L, Jurkiewicz L, Darney BG. Evaluating process fidelity during the implementation of Group Antenatal Care in Mexico. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:559. [PMID: 32552889 PMCID: PMC7301482 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05430-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a group antenatal care (G-ANC) model that has proven beneficial for mothers and their newborns. We conducted a feasibility study beginning in 2016 as part of the Mexican effort to implement G-ANC locally. This study reports on fidelity to the essential elements of CP during its implementation in Mexico. METHODS We collected prospective data using a standardized checklist at four primary-care centers that implemented our adapted G-ANC model. We performed a descriptive analysis of fidelity to 28 processes per G-ANC session (71 sessions made up of 10 groups and 129 women across 4 health centers). We calculated fidelity to each process as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals. We present overall results and stratified by health center and by facilitation team. RESULTS Overall fidelity to the G-ANC intervention was 82%, with variability by health center (78-88%). The elements with the highest fidelity were having space for activities such as checking vital signs, conversation in a circle, and medical check-ups (100% each) and the element with the lowest fidelity was using music to enhance privacy (27.3%). Fidelity was not significantly different by center. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests good model fidelity during the implementation of G-ANC in Mexico. Our findings also contribute useful information about where to focus efforts in the future to maintain and improve G-ANC model fidelity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Ileana Heredia-Pi
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Zafiro Andrade-Romo
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Lourdes Bravo
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Laurie Jurkiewicz
- Department of ObGyn & Reproductive Sciences, UCSF/SFGH, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Blair G. Darney
- OHSU, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA
- National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hoekstra F, Hoekstra T, van der Schans CP, Hettinga FJ, van der Woude LHV, Dekker R. The implementation of a physical activity counseling program in rehabilitation care: findings from the ReSpAct study. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 43:1710-1721. [PMID: 31622120 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1675188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of a physical activity counseling program in rehabilitation and to study heterogeneity in received counseling and investigate its association with changes in patients' physical activity outcomes. METHODS This prospective cohort study was conducted in 18 rehabilitation institutions. Data were collected using surveys completed by professionals (n= ±70) and patients (n = 1719). Implementation was evaluated using different process outcomes: reach, dosage, satisfaction, maintenance. Patients' physical activity outcomes included changes in total minutes/week of physical activity. Latent class analyses were conducted to identify profiles of received counseling characteristics and multilevel models were used to investigate associations with physical activity outcomes. RESULTS 5873 Patients were provided with motivational interviewing-based counseling after rehabilitation. Professionals and patients were positive about the program. Sixteen institutions (89%) formally agreed to continue the program. The four identified profiles of counseling characteristics illustrate a large variation in received counseling among patients. No substantial differences in physical activity outcomes were found between profiles. CONCLUSION After a three-year program period, the physical activity counseling centers were sustainably implemented in Dutch rehabilitation care. This study illustrated an innovative approach to assess heterogeneity in implementation outcomes (e.g., counseling profiles) in relation to program outcomes (e.g., physical activity).Implications for rehabilitationPhysical activity counseling after rehabilitation is important to support people with disabilities in making the step from rehabilitation-based physical activities to community-based physical activities.Establishing "Physical Activity Counseling Centers" is a promising "disability-overarching" strategy to promote physical activity after rehabilitation.Although the actual received counseling (dosage) varied among patients, this did not coincide with large differences in physical activity outcomes.The training in Motivational Interviewing, the financial incentives, and the advisory support were considered as important or essential ingredients for a successful implementation of the counseling program in rehabilitation practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke Hoekstra
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Center for Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Trynke Hoekstra
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Center for Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cees P van der Schans
- Center for Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Dept Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Florentina J Hettinga
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom
| | - Lucas H V van der Woude
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Center for Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rienk Dekker
- Center for Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Center for Sports Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bounthavong M, Devine EB, Christopher MLD, Harvey MA, Veenstra DL, Basu A. Implementation evaluation of academic detailing on naloxone prescribing trends at the United States Veterans Health Administration. Health Serv Res 2019; 54:1055-1064. [PMID: 31313839 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Academic detailing in partnership with the Opioid Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution (OEND) program was implemented to increase naloxone access for the prevention of opioid overdose mortality in veterans at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). However, implementation was not uniform leading to varying levels of intervention exposure potentially impacting naloxone prescribing. We examined the impact of implementation strength (proportion of providers exposed to academic detailing) at each station on naloxone prescribing from September 2014 to December 2017. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective cohort design with fixed effects models at the VA. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We used VA Corporate Data Warehouse for data on pharmacy dispensing, station-, provider- and patient-level characteristics. OEND-specific academic detailing activities came from data recorded by academic detailers using Salesforce.com. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS VA stations wherein 100 percent of providers exposed to an OEND-related academic detailing educational outreach visit experienced an increased incident rate of naloxone prescribing that was 5.52 times the incident rate of stations where no providers were exposed; alternatively, this is equivalent to an average monthly increase of 2.60 naloxone prescriptions per 1000 population at risk for opioid overdose. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the importance of academic detailing's implementation strength on naloxone prescribing. Decision makers must carefully consider the implementation process to achieve the greatest effectiveness from the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Bounthavong
- Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM), National Academic Detailing Service, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.,The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Economics Resource Center (HERC), Menlo Park, California.,Veterans Affairs (VA) Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, California
| | - Emily Beth Devine
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Melissa L D Christopher
- Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM), National Academic Detailing Service, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC
| | - Michael A Harvey
- Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM), National Academic Detailing Service, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC
| | - David L Veenstra
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Anirban Basu
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Joyce A, Ollis D, Kearney S, Leung L, Foenander E. The influence of contextual factors on implementation fidelity in a whole school approach to prevention of violence against women. Health Promot J Austr 2018; 30:238-245. [PMID: 30168643 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED Implementation fidelity relates to the degree of adherence to implementation protocols and content and helps to guide replication of evidence-based programs. In settings-based research, notions of fidelity have been applied more often to delivery of education content rather than whole of setting change. The aims of this paper were firstly, to analyse how contextual factors influenced implementation of a whole school program on respectful relationships education, and secondly given the findings, discuss whether a more flexible approach to implementation fidelity may have yielded increased school engagement. METHODS The project was conducted in 19 secondary schools in Victoria in 2015. This paper reports on focus groups and interviews which were conducted with 81 school staff and 28 staff from the lead agency, community agency partners, and departmental staff to understand the contextual factors influencing implementation. RESULTS The program followed a traditional implementation fidelity approach of considering core elements and some minor scope for adaption which engaged some regions and schools but not others. CONCLUSION An alternative notion of implementation fidelity, "fidelity to function," may have permitted increased flexibility to tailor the intervention components to suit different school and community contexts and potentially, increasing both the reach and impact of the program. SO WHAT?: Understanding how to apply notions of fidelity to guide whole of setting change are important considerations if programs are to be replicated to have wider reach and greater impact and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Joyce
- Faculty of Business and Law, Centre for Social Impact Swinburne, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Vic., Australia
| | - Debbie Ollis
- Faculty of Arts and Education, School of Education, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia
| | | | | | - Emily Foenander
- Faculty of Business and Law, Centre for Social Impact Swinburne, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|