1
|
The impact of cancer patient pathway on timing of radiotherapy and survival: a cohort study in glioblastoma patients. J Neurooncol 2024:10.1007/s11060-024-04709-z. [PMID: 38762830 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04709-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor in which primary therapy is standardized and consists of surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. However, the optimal time from surgery to start of RT is unknown. A high-grade glioma cancer patient pathway (CPP) was implemented in Norway in 2015 to avoid non-medical delays and regional disparity, and to optimize information flow to patients. This study investigated how CPP affected time to RT after surgery and overall survival. METHODS This study included consecutive GBM patients diagnosed in South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority from 2006 to 2019 and treated with RT. The pre CPP implementation group constituted patients diagnosed 2006-2014, and the post CPP implementation group constituted patients diagnosed 2016-2019. We evaluated timing of RT and survival in relation to CPP implementation. RESULTS A total of 1212 patients with GBM were included. CPP implementation was associated with significantly better outcomes (p < 0.001). Median overall survival was 12.9 months. The odds of receiving RT within four weeks after surgery were significantly higher post CPP implementation (p < 0.001). We found no difference in survival dependent on timing of RT below 4, 4-6 or more than 6 weeks (p = 0.349). Prognostic factors for better outcomes in adjusted analyses were female sex (p = 0.005), younger age (p < 0.001), solitary tumors (p = 0.008), gross total resection (p < 0.001), and higher RT dose (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION CPP implementation significantly reduced time to start of postoperative RT. Survival was significantly longer in the period after the CPP implementation, however, timing of postoperative RT relative to time of surgery did not impact survival.
Collapse
|
2
|
The application of decision tree model based on clinicopathological risk factors and pre-operative MRI radiomics for predicting short-term recurrence of glioblastoma after total resection: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Cancer Res 2023; 13:3449-3462. [PMID: 37693142 PMCID: PMC10492119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
To develop a decision tree model based on clinical information, molecular genetics information and pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics-score (Rad-score) to investigate its predictive value for the risk of recurrence of glioblastoma (GBM) within one year after total resection. Patients with pathologically confirmed GBM at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between November 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and the enrolled patients were randomly divided into training and test sets according to the ratio of 3:1. The relevant clinical and MRI data of patients before, after surgery and follow-up were collected, and after feature extraction on preoperative MRI, the LASSO filter was used to filter the features and establish the Rad-score. Using the training set, a decision tree model for predicting recurrence of GBM within one year after total resection was established by the C5.0 algorithm, and scatter plots were generated to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the decision tree during model testing. The prediction performance of the model was also evaluated by calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), ACC, Sensitivity (SEN), Specificity (SPE) and other indicators. Besides, two external validation datasets from Wuhan union hospital and the second affiliated hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were used to verify the reliability and accuracy of the prediction model. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 134 patients with GBM were finally identified for inclusion in the study, and 53 patients recurred within one year after total resection, with a mean recurrence time of 5.6 months. According to the importance of the predictor variables, a decision tree model for predicting recurrence based on five important factors, including patient age, Rad-score, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, pre-operative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation, was developed. The AUCs of the model in the training and test sets were 0.850 and 0.719, respectively, and the scatter plot showed excellent consistency. In addition, the prediction model achieved AUCs of 0.810 and 0.702 in two external validation datasets from Wuhan union hospital and the second affiliated hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, respectively. The decision tree model based on clinicopathological risk factors and preoperative MRI Rad-score can accurately predict the risk of recurrence of GBM within one year after total resection, which can further guide the clinical optimization of patient treatment decisions, as well as refine the clinical management of patients and improve their prognoses to a certain extent.
Collapse
|
3
|
Impact of radiotherapy delay following biopsy for patients with unresected glioblastoma. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:610-620. [PMID: 35907197 DOI: 10.3171/2022.5.jns212761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Because of the aggressive nature of glioblastoma, patients with unresected disease are encouraged to begin radiotherapy within approximately 1 month after craniotomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential association between time interval from biopsy to radiotherapy with overall survival in patients with unresected glioblastoma. METHODS Patients with unresected glioblastoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 who received adjuvant radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Demographic and clinical data were compared using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. RESULTS Among 3456 patients with unresected glioblastoma, initiation of radiotherapy within 3 weeks of biopsy was associated with a higher hazard of death compared with later initiation of radiotherapy. After excluding patients who received radiotherapy within 3 weeks of biopsy to minimize the effects of confounders associated with short time intervals from biopsy to radiotherapy, the median interval from biopsy to radiotherapy was 32 days (IQR 27-39 days). Overall, 1782 (66.82%) patients started radiotherapy within 5 weeks of biopsy, and 885 (33.18%) patients started radiotherapy beyond 5 weeks of biopsy. On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.50; p = 0.374). CONCLUSIONS In patients with unresected glioblastoma, a longer time interval from biopsy to radiotherapy does not appear to be associated with worse overall survival. However, external validation of these findings is necessary given that selection bias is a significant limitation of this study.
Collapse
|
4
|
Glioblastoma Multiforme: Probing Solutions to Systemic Toxicity towards High-Dose Chemotherapy and Inflammatory Influence in Resistance against Temozolomide. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15020687. [PMID: 36840009 PMCID: PMC9962012 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Temozolomide (TMZ), the first-line chemotherapeutic drug against glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), often fails to provide the desired clinical outcomes due to inflammation-induced resistance amid inefficient drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The current study utilized solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNPs) for targeted delivery of TMZ against GBM. After successful formulation and characterization of SLNPs and conjugation with TMZ (SLNP-TMZ), their in-vitro anti-cancer efficacy and effect on the migratory potential of cancer cells were evaluated using temozolomide-sensitive (U87-S) as well as TMZ-resistant (U87-R) glioma cell lines. Elevated cytotoxicity and reduction in cell migration in both cell lines were observed with SLNP-TMZ as compared to the free drug (p < 0.05). Similar results were obtained in-vivo using an orthotopic xenograft mouse model (XM-S and XM-R), where a reduction in tumor size was observed with SLNP-TMZ treatment compared to TMZ. Concomitantly, higher concentrations of the drug were found in brain tissue resections of mice treated with SLNP-TMZ as compared to other vital organs than mice treated with free TMZ. Expression of inflammatory markers (Interleukin-1β, Interleukin-6 and Tumor Necrosis factor-α) in a resistant cell line (U87-R) and its respective mouse model (XM-R) were also found to be significantly elevated as compared to the sensitive U87-S cell line and its respective mouse model (XM-S). Thus, the in-vitro and in-vivo results of the study strongly support the potential application of SLNP-TMZ for TMZ-sensitive and resistant GBM therapy, indicatively through inflammatory mechanisms, and thus merit further detailed insights.
Collapse
|
5
|
Impact of Rural vs. Urban Residence on Survival Rates of Patients with Glioblastoma: A Tertiary Care Center Experience. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12091186. [PMID: 36138922 PMCID: PMC9496950 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12091186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Although the association between residential location and survival in patients with different cancer types has been established, the conclusions are contentious, and the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we reviewed the impact of residence on the survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the impact of rural and urban residence on the survival rates of patients with GBM diagnosed in Riyadh City and outside Riyadh. All patients in this study were treated in a tertiary care hospital, and their survival rates were analyzed in relation to their residence and other related factors, namely radiotherapy timing. Results: Overall, 125 patients were included: 61 from Riyadh City and 64 from outside. The majority of patients in both groups were aged >50 years (p = 0.814). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (p = 0.430), seizure (p = 0.858), or initiation timing of radiotherapy (p = 0.781). Furthermore, the median survival rate in the Riyadh group versus the other group was 14.4 months and 12.2 months, respectively, with no statistical significance (p = 0.187). Conclusions: Our study showed that residential location had no significant effect on GBM prognosis. However, further studies with a larger sample size are required to delineate the other factors of referral within the healthcare system to facilitate the management of these patients within a specific timeframe.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mini-craniotomy for intra-axial brain tumors: a comparison with conventional craniotomy in 306 patients harboring non-dural based lesions. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45:2983-2991. [PMID: 35585468 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01811-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The use of a mini-craniotomy approach involving linear skin incision and a bone flap of about 3 cm has been reported for several neurosurgical diseases, such as aneurysms or cranial base tumors. More superficial lesions, including intra-axial tumors, may occasionally raise concerns due to insufficient control of the tumor boundaries. The convenience of a minimally invasive approach to intrinsic brain tumors was evaluated by comparing 161 patients who underwent mini-craniotomy (MC) for intra-axial brain tumors with a group of 145 patients operated on by the same surgical team through a conventional craniotomy (CC). Groups were propensity-matched for age, preoperative condition, size and location of the tumor, and pathological diagnosis. Results were analyzed focusing on operative time, the extent of resection, clinical outcome, hospitalization time, and time to start adjuvant therapy. Mini-craniotomy was equally effective in terms of extent of resection (GTR: 70.9% in the MC group vs 70.5% in the CC group) but had shorter operative time (average: 165 min in the MC group vs 205 min in the CC group p < 0.001) and lower rate of postoperative complications both superficial (1.03% vs 6.5% in the CC group p = 0.009) and deep (4% in the MC group vs 5.5% in the CC group p = 0,47). No relationship was found between the size or location of the tumor and resection rate. The MC group had reduced hospitalization time (average: 5.8 days vs 7.6 in CC group p < 0.001) and faster access to adjuvant therapies. 92.5% of the MC patients, which were scheduled for treatment, started radiotherapy within 8 weeks after surgery as opposed to 84.1% in the CC group (p = 0.04). These findings support the increasing use of mini-craniotomy for intra-axial brain tumors.
Collapse
|
7
|
A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY TO ASSESS WAITING TIMES TO FIRST TREATMENT IN PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH BRAIN TUMOR. Acta Clin Croat 2022; 61:124-128. [PMID: 36398089 PMCID: PMC9616041 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.01.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim was to investigate and determine waiting intervals from diagnosis to first treatment in brain tumor patients. A prospective observational study was performed at the Department of Neurology, Split University Hospital Center, Split, Croatia, from February 21, 2016 until April 10, 2017. The inclusion criterion was the diagnosis of brain tumor confirmed by standard neuroimaging methods. The diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) was defined as the time interval between the date of confirmed radiological diagnosis and the initiation of definitive treatment. Out of 73 patients diagnosed with brain tumor, 3 of them died, 16 were discharged for symptomatic treatment, and the rest were cured by surgical and/or oncologic procedures. The median DTI for any kind of treatment was 15.5 days. The median DTI for radio-guided and resection surgery was 14 days, while the median DTI for the initial oncologic treatment was 42 days. The median DTI of 15.5 days for brain tumors is still, by a wide margin, beyond the preferable one-digit number. When compared to the available data from other countries, however, it seems that the health system in Croatia provides the same, if not a slightly higher, level of efficiency. The median DTI for primary oncologic treatment did, however, indicate a substantial delay.
Collapse
|
8
|
The Role of Delayed Radiotherapy Initiation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma with Residual Tumor Mass. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2021; 83:252-258. [PMID: 34496417 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treatment for newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximum safe resection, followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy (RCx) with temozolomide. There is evidence that it is safe for GBM patients to prolong time to irradiation over 4 weeks after surgery. This study aimed at evaluating whether this applies to GBM patients with different levels of residual tumor volume (RV). METHODS Medical records of all patients with newly diagnosed GBM at our department between 2014 and 2018 were reviewed. Patients who received adjuvant radio (chemo) therapy, aged older than 18 years, and with adequate perioperative imaging were included. Initial and residual tumor volumes were determined. Time to irradiation was dichotomized into two groups (≤28 and >28 days). Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier estimate and log-rank test was performed. Survival prediction and multivariate analysis were performed employing Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS One hundred and twelve patients were included. Adjuvant treatment regimen, extent of resection, residual tumor volume, and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation were statistically significant factors for overall survival (OS). Time to irradiation had no impact on progression-free survival (p = 0.946) or OS (p = 0.757). When stratified for different thresholds of residual tumor volume, survival predication via Cox regression favored time to irradiation below 28 days for patients with residual tumor volume above 2 mL, but statistical significance was not reached. CONCLUSION Time to irradiation had no significant influence on OS of the entire cohort. Nevertheless, a statistically nonsignificant survival prolongation could be observed in patients with residual tumor volume > 2 mL when admitted to radiotherapy within 28 days after surgery.
Collapse
|
9
|
The survival impact of significant delays between surgery and radiochemotherapy in glioblastoma patients: A retrospective analysis from a large tertiary center. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 90:39-47. [PMID: 34275579 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The optimal timing of adjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients remains unknown and the paradigm of 'the sooner, the better' has been challenged by many recent publications. In this study, we present unique data on the outcomes of patients with significant treatment delays. The study group consisted of 346 GBM patients (median age 56.8 years) who received surgical treatment (total or subtotal resection) and then underwent adjuvant concurrent RCT at one institution. The main endpoint was overall survival (OS). The Univariate and multivariate Cox Proportional-Hazard Model, log-rank test, and Kaplan-Meier method were used for the analysis. The median OS was 18.7 months and the 5-year overall survival was 8.5%. The median time interval from surgery to RCT was 9.8 weeks. The Cox regression showed that the time interval had no statistically significant impact on OS both in uni- and multivariate analysis. The explorative analysis suggested a positive trend for improved survival for patients in the 1st quartile of the time interval, especially for patients with residual disease or local recurrence prior to RCT, However, considering the 6.9 weeks median interval in the 1st quartile, this subgroup should still be regarded as 'moderate delay' compared with other literature data. The results indicate that the time interval is not a clear prognostic factor in the treatment of GBM. Prospective trials are highly warranted, as data suggest that moderate delays in the initiation of adjuvant treatment might be associated with survival benefit.
Collapse
|
10
|
Racial/ethnic disparities in treatment pattern and time to treatment for adults with glioblastoma in the US. J Neurooncol 2021; 152:603-615. [PMID: 33755877 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03736-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Race/ethnicity have been previously shown to significantly affect survival after diagnosis with glioblastoma, but the cause of this survival difference is not known. The aim of this study was to examine variation in treatment pattern and time to treatment by race/ethnicity, and the extent to which this affects survival. METHODS Data were obtained from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for adults ≥ 40 with glioblastoma from 2004 to 2016 (N = 68,979). Treatment patterns and time to treatment by race/ethnicity were compared using univariable and multivariable logistic and linear regression models, respectively, and adjusted for known prognostic factors and factors potentially affecting health care access. RESULTS Black non-Hispanics (BNH) and Hispanics were less likely to receive radiation and less likely to receive chemotherapy as compared to White non-Hispanics (WNH). Time to radiation initiation was ~ 2 days longer and time to chemotherapy initiation was ~ 4 days longer in both groups in comparison to WNH. CONCLUSION Both race/ethnicity and treatment timing significantly affected survival time, and this association remained after adjustment for known prognostic factors. Additional research is necessary to disentangle the specific causal factors, and the mechanism with which they affect survival.
Collapse
|
11
|
Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of chemotherapeutic management and antiangiogenic treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults. J Neurooncol 2020; 150:165-213. [PMID: 33215343 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03601-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
QUESTION What is the role of temozolomide in the management of adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. RECOMMENDATION Level I: Concurrent and post-irradiation Temozolomide (TMZ) in combination with radiotherapy and post-radiotherapy as described by Stupp et al. is recommended to improve both PFS and OS in adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM. There is no evidence that alterations in the dosing regimen have additional beneficial effect. QUESTION Is there benefit to adjuvant temozolomide treatment in elderly patients (> 65 years old?). TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. RECOMMENDATION Level III: Adjuvant TMZ treatment is suggested as a treatment option to improve PFS and OS in adult patients (over 70 years of age) with newly diagnosed GBM. QUESTION What is the role of local regional chemotherapy with BCNU biodegradable polymeric wafers in adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. RECOMMENDATION Level III: There is insufficient evidence for the use of BCNU wafers following resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who undergo the Stupp protocol after surgery. Further studies of higher quality are suggested to understand the role of BCNU wafer and other locoregional therapy in the setting of Stupp Protocol. QUESTION What is the role of bevacizumab in the adult patient with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. RECOMMENDATION Level I: Bevacizumab in general is not recommended in the initial treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM. It continues to be strongly recommended that patients with newly diagnosed GBM be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials to assess the benefit of novel chemotherapeutic agents compared to standard therapy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Dual MGMT inactivation by promoter hypermethylation and loss of the long arm of chromosome 10 in glioblastoma. Cancer Med 2020; 9:6344-6353. [PMID: 32666673 PMCID: PMC7476845 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Epigenetic inactivation of O6‐methylguanine‐methyltransferase (MGMT) gene by methylation of its promoter is predictive of Temozolomid (TMZ) response in glioblastoma (GBM). MGMT is located on chromosome 10q26 and the loss of chromosome 10q is observed in 70% of GBMs. In this study, we assessed the hypothesis that the dual inactivation of MGMT, by hypermethylation of MGMT promoter and by loss the long arm of chromosome 10 (10q), may confer greater sensitivity to TMZ. Methods A total of 149 tumor samples from patients diagnosed with GBM based on the WHO 2016 classification were included in this retrospective study between November 2016 and December 2018. Methylation status of MGMT promoter was evaluated by pyrosequencing and status of chromosome 10q was assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization. Results Glioblastoma patients with chromosome 10q loss associated with hypermethylation of MGMT promoter had significantly longer overall survival (OS) (P = .0024) and progression‐free survival (PFS) (P = .031). Indeed, median OS of patients with dual inactivation of MGMT was 21.5 months compared to 12 months and 8.1 months for groups with single MGMT inactivation by hypermethylation and by 10q loss, respectively. The group with no MGMT inactivation had 9.5 months OS. Moreover, all long‐term survivors with persistent response to TMZ treatment (OS ≥ 30 months) displayed dual inactivation of MGMT. Conclusions Our data suggest that the molecular subgroup characterized by the dual inactivation of MGMT receives greater benefit from TMZ treatment. The results of our study may be of immediate clinical interest since chromosome 10q status and methylation of MGMT promoter are commonly determined in routine practice.
Collapse
|
13
|
Optimal Timing of Radiotherapy Following Gross Total or Subtotal Resection of Glioblastoma: A Real-World Assessment using the National Cancer Database. Sci Rep 2020; 10:4926. [PMID: 32188907 PMCID: PMC7080722 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61701-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. The optimal time interval between surgery and RT remains unclear. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with GBM. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable Cox regression (MVA) modeling was used to determine predictors of OS. A total of 45,942 patients were included. On MVA: younger age, female gender, black ethnicity, higher KPS, obtaining a gross total resection (GTR), MGMT promoter-methylated gene status, unifocal disease, higher RT dose, and RT delay of 4–8 weeks had improved OS. Patients who underwent a subtotal resection (STR) had worsened survival with RT delay ≤4 weeks and patients with GTR had worsened survival when RT was delayed >8 weeks. This analysis suggests that an interval of 4–8 weeks between resection and RT results in better survival. Delays >8 weeks in patients with a GTR and delays <4 weeks in patients with a STR/biopsy resulted in worse survival. This impact of time delay from surgery to RT, in conjunction with extent of resection, should be considered in the clinical management of patients and future designs of clinical trials.
Collapse
|
14
|
Estimation of the effects of radiotherapy treatment delays on tumour responses: A review. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.4102/sajo.v4i0.91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
15
|
Stereotactic irradiation of the resection cavity after surgical resection of brain metastases - when is the right timing? Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1714-1719. [PMID: 31368403 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1643917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether an early beginning of the adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy after macroscopic complete resection of 1-3 brain metastases is essential or whether longer intervals between surgery and radiotherapy are feasible.Material and methods: Sixty-six patients with 69 resection cavities treated with HFSRT after macroscopic complete resection of 1-3 brain metastases between 2009 and 2016 in our institution were included in this study. Overall survival, local recurrence and locoregional recurrence were evaluated depending on the time interval from surgery to the start of radiation therapy.Results: Patients that started radiotherapy within 21 days from surgery had a significantly decreased OS compared to patients treated after a longer interval from surgery (p < .01). There was no significant difference between patients treated ≥ 34 and 22-33 days from surgery (p = .210). In the univariate analysis, local control was superior for patients starting treatment 22-33 days from surgery compared to a later start (p = .049). This effect did not prevail in a multivariate model. There was no significant difference between patients treated within 21 days and patients treated more than 33 days after surgery (p = .203). Locoregional control was not influenced by RT timing (p = .508).Conclusion: A short delay in the start of radiotherapy does not seem to negatively impact the outcome in patients with resected brain metastases. We even observed an unexpected reduction in OS in patients treated within 21 days from surgery. Further studies are needed to define the optimal timing of postoperative radiotherapy to the resection cavity.
Collapse
|
16
|
High-grade Glioma - A decade of care in Christchurch. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 63:665-673. [PMID: 31464076 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High-grade glioma (HGG) is a devastating illness. Our study aimed to investigate outcomes for patients with HGG treated in Christchurch focussing particularly on those diagnosed with glioblastoma mulitforme (GBM); compare GBM survival with international standards; examine factors associated with better prognosis; and assess the involvement of various allied health disciplines. METHODS A 10-year retrospective study of patients who were diagnosed and treated for HGG at Christchurch Hospital. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Predefined multivariate analysis was performed to investigate potential prognostic and predictive factors. RESULTS A total of 363 patients were diagnosed with HGG at a median age of 64 years with a 5-year overall survival of 6.1%. Patients with grade IV tumours had a poorer outcome than grade III patients (P = 0.0002, log-rank test). Eighty-two per cent of patients had a surgical resection or biopsy of the tumour. For those patients with GBM, gross tumour resection followed by radical chemoradiation was associated with better survival compared with needle biopsy (HR = 1.93, P = 0.018); increasing age was negatively associated with survival (HR = 1.02 per additional age year, P = 0.037); however, waiting time between neurosurgery and radiation did not affect survival. Six per cent of patients received formal psychological input. CONCLUSION Our survival outcomes were comparable with internationally published series. More research is required to improve survival in HGG, including molecular guided treatment, and better define treatment paradigms, such as for the elderly and frail.
Collapse
|
17
|
The impact of timing of adjuvant therapy on survival for patients with glioblastoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 66:92-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
18
|
Impact of time to initiation of radiotherapy on survival after resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:73. [PMID: 31036031 PMCID: PMC6489245 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1272-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To evaluate the effect of timing of radiotherapy (RT) on survival in patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma (GBM) treated with the same therapeutical protocol. Materials and methods Patients with newly diagnosed primary GBM treated with the same therapeutical scheme between 2010 and 2015 in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The population was trichotomized based on the time interval from surgery till initiation of RT (< 28 days, 28–33 days, > 33 days). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to compare progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the groups. The influence of various extensively studied prognostic factors on survival was assessed by multivariate analysis. Results One-hundred-fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Between the three groups no significant difference in PFS (p = 0.516) or OS (p = 0.902) could be demonstrated. Residual tumor volume (RTV) and midline structures involvement were identified as independent prognostic factors of PFS while age, O-6-Methylguanine Methyltransferase (MGMT) status, Ki67 index, RTV and midline structures involvement represented independent predictors of OS. Patients starting RT after a prolonged delay (> 48 days) exhibited a significantly shorter OS (p = 0.034). Conclusion Initiation of RT within a timeframe of 48 days is not associated with worsened survival. A prolonged delay (> 48 days) may be associated with worse OS. RT should neither be delayed, nor forced, but should rather start timely, as soon as the patient has recovered from surgery.
Collapse
|
19
|
Locally dose-escalated radiotherapy may improve intracranial local control and overall survival among patients with glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:251. [PMID: 30567592 PMCID: PMC6299982 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1194-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The dismal overall survival (OS) prognosis of glioblastoma, even after trimodal therapy, can be attributed mainly to the frequent incidence of intracranial relapse (ICR), which tends to present as an in-field recurrence after a radiation dose of 60 Gray (Gy). In this study, molecular marker-based prognostic indices were used to compare the outcomes of radiation with a standard dose versus a moderate dose escalation. Methods This retrospective analysis included 156 patients treated between 2009 and 2016. All patients were medically fit for postoperative chemoradiotherapy. In the dose-escalation cohort a simultaneous integrated boost of up to 66 Gy (66 Gy RT) within small high-risk volumes was applied. All other patients received daily radiation to a total dose of 60 Gy or twice daily to a total dose of 59.2 Gy (60 Gy RT). Results A total of 133 patients received standard 60 Gy RT, while 23 received 66 Gy RT. Patients in the 66 Gy RT group were younger (p < 0.001), whereas concomitant temozolomide use was more frequent in the 60 Gy RT group (p < 0.001). Other intergroup differences in known prognostic factors were not observed. Notably, the median time to ICR was significantly prolonged in the 66 Gy RT arm versus the 60 Gy RT arm (12.2 versus 7.6 months, p = 0.011), and this translated to an improved OS (18.8 versus 15.3 months, p = 0.012). A multivariate analysis revealed a strong association of 66 Gy RT with a prolonged time to ICR (hazard ratio = 0.498, p = 0.01) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.451, p = 0.01). These differences remained significant after implementing molecular marker-based prognostic scores (ICR p = 0.008, OS p = 0.007) and propensity-scored matched pairing (ICR p = 0.099, OS p = 0.023). Conclusion Radiation dose escalation was found to correlate with an improved time to ICR and OS in this cohort of glioblastoma patients. However, further prospective validation of these results is warranted. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1194-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
20
|
The impact of waiting time on patient outcomes: Evidence from early intervention in psychosis services in England. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2018; 27:1772-1787. [PMID: 30014544 PMCID: PMC6221005 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Recently, new emphasis was put on reducing waiting times in mental health services as there is an ongoing concern that longer waiting time for treatment leads to poorer health outcomes. However, little is known about delays within the mental health service system and its impact on patients. We explore the impact of waiting times on patient outcomes in the context of early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services in England from April 2012 to March 2015. We use the Mental Health Services Data Set and the routine outcome measure the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale. In a generalised linear regression model, we control for baseline outcomes, previous service use, and treatment intensity to account for possible endogeneity in waiting time. We find that longer waiting time is significantly associated with a deterioration in patient outcomes 12 months after acceptance for treatment for patients that are still in EIP care. Effects are strongest for waiting times longer than 3 months, and effect sizes are small to moderate. Patients with shorter treatment periods are not affected. The results suggest that policies should aim to reduce excessively long waits in order to improve outcomes for patients waiting for treatment for psychosis.
Collapse
|
21
|
Survival after radiation therapy for high-grade glioma. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2018; 24:35-40. [PMID: 30337846 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 01/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are a heterogeneous disease group, with variable prognosis, inevitably causing deterioration of the quality of life. The estimated 2-year overall survival is 20%, despite the best trimodality treatment consisting of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate long-term survival outcomes and factors influencing the survival of patients with high-grade gliomas treated with radiotherapy. Materials and methods Data from 47 patients diagnosed with high-grade gliomas between 2009 and 2014 and treated with three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were analyzed retrospectively. Results Median survival was 16.6 months; 29 patients (62%) died before the time of analysis. IMRT was employed in 68% of cases. The mean duration of radiotherapy was 56 days, and the mean delay to the start of radiotherapy was 61.7 days (range, 27-123 days). There were no statistically significant effects of duration of radiotherapy or delay to the start of radiotherapy on patient outcomes. Conclusions Age, total amount of gross resection, histological type, and use of adjuvant temozolomide influenced survival rate (p < 0.05). The estimated overall survival was 18 months (Kaplan-Meier estimator). Our results corroborated those reported in the literature.
Collapse
|
22
|
Survival Impact of Delaying Postoperative Radiotherapy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Transl Oncol 2018; 11:1358-1363. [PMID: 30196238 PMCID: PMC6132173 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to retrospectively assess the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) delay on survival for patients with esophageal cancer. From 2008 to 2011, patients with esophageal cancer who had undergone postoperative RT in five different hospitals in China were reviewed. Clinical data, including time interval between surgery to RT, were prospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier method was conducted to estimate the effect of each variable on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with differences assessed by log-rank test. Univariate Cox proportional-hazards models were performed for both PFS and OS for all assumed predictor variables. Statistically significant predictor variables (P < .05) on univariate analysis were then included in multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models, which were performed to compare the effects of RT delay on PFS and OS. A total of 316 patients were finally enrolled in this prospectively multicentric study. Time to RT after surgery varied from 12 days to over 60 days (median, 26 days). Multivariate analysis showed that delay to RT longer than the median does not appear to be a survival cost. There was also no statistically difference in PFS (P = .513) or OS (P = .236) between patients stratified by quartiles (≤21 days vs ≧35 days). However, patients with particularly long delays (≧42 days) demonstrated a detrimental impact on OS (P = .021) but not PFS (P = .580). Delaying postoperative RT of esophageal cancer does not impact PFS, but results in a significant reduction on OS if delaying longer than 6 weeks.
Collapse
|
23
|
Survival impact of prolonged postoperative radiation therapy for patients with glioblastoma treated with combined-modality therapy. Neurooncol Pract 2018; 6:112-123. [PMID: 31386043 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npy027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Though conventionally fractionated chemoradiation (CRT) is well tolerated by selected patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), adverse health-related and nonhealth-related factors can lead to unplanned interruptions in treatment. The effects of prolonged time to completion (TTC) of radiation therapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) for these patients are unclear. Methods The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM undergoing surgical resection followed by adjuvant CRT with conventionally fractionated RT (6000-6600 cGy in 30-33 fractions) from 2005 to 2012. TTC was defined as the interval from first to last fraction of RT. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to determine a threshold for TTC of adjuvant RT. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify covariates associated with OS. Results A total of 13489 patients were included in our cohort. Patients who completed adjuvant RT within the RPA-defined threshold of 46 days from initiation of RT (median OS: 14.0 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.7 to 14.3 months) had significantly improved OS compared to patients with TTC of 47 days or greater (median OS: 12.0 months, 95% CI 11.4 to 12.6 months, P < .001). Delays in completing adjuvant RT were relatively common, with 15.0% of patients in our cohort having a TTC of RT of 47 days or greater. Conclusions Delays in completing adjuvant RT were associated with a worse survival outcome. Any unnecessary delays in completing adjuvant RT should be minimized while ensuring the safe delivery of therapy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Does the interval from tumour surgery to radiotherapy influence survival in paediatric high grade glioma? Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 194:552-559. [PMID: 29349602 PMCID: PMC5959993 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1260-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Paediatric high grade glioma (pHGG) are rare. Following maximum safe resection, children >3 years with HGG receive radiotherapy as standard of care. Whether the interval from tumour surgery to radiotherapy (ISRT) influences survival is disputed in adults with glioblastoma, data for children are lacking. This retrospective single-centre analysis investigates a possible impact of ISRT on survival in paediatric patients with HGG. METHODS Survival was analysed in patients aged 3-19 years with non-pontine HGG. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included (female:male 19:19) with a median age of 11.0 years (3.4-17.7). Seventeen patients had grade 3 and 21 grade 4 glioma. Gross total resection was achieved in 26.3%, partial resection in 36.8% and 36.8% underwent biopsy only. All patients received concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Fifty percent (n = 19) started irradiation ≤17 days (median interval 12 days [range 5-17]), 50% thereafter (median 28 days [range 19-78]). More patients with grade 4 tumours were irradiated shortly after surgery. ISRT (as a continuous variable and dichotomised into two groups by the median ISRT of 18 days) did not significantly influence overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). Higher extent of resection (EOR), lower tumour grade as well as chemotherapy with temozolomide had a significant positive impact on OS and PFS in univariate analysis and (except for the effect of temozolomide on PFS) also in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS ISRT did not influence survival in pHGG. In view of upcoming targeted treatment options in pHGG the present data suggest that it is safe to perform molecular analyses within a 4-week timeframe before radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
25
|
Delay in starting radiotherapy due to neoadjuvant therapy does not worsen survival in unresected glioblastoma patients. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:1529-1537. [PMID: 29737461 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1883-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We retrospectively examined the potential effect on overall survival (OS) of delaying radiotherapy to administer neoadjuvant therapy in unresected glioblastoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We compared OS in 119 patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy followed by standard treatment (NA group) and 96 patients receiving standard treatment without neoadjuvant therapy (NoNA group). The MaxStat package of R identified the optimal cut-off point for waiting time to radiotherapy. RESULTS OS was similar in the NA and NoNA groups. Median waiting time to radiotherapy after surgery was 13 weeks for the NA group and 4.2 weeks for the NoNA group. The longest OS was attained by patients who started radiotherapy after 12 weeks and the shortest by patients who started radiotherapy within 4 weeks (12.3 vs 6.6 months) (P = 0.05). OS was 6.6 months for patients who started radiotherapy before the optimal cutoff of 6.43 weeks and 19.1 months for those who started after this time (P = 0.005). Patients who completed radiotherapy had longer OS than those who did not, in all 215 patients and in the NA and NoNA groups (P = 0.000). In several multivariate analyses, completing radiotherapy was a universally favorable prognostic factor, while neoadjuvant therapy was never identified as a negative prognostic factor. CONCLUSION In our series of unresected patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment, in spite of the delay in starting radiotherapy, OS was not inferior to that of a similar group of patients with no delay in starting radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
26
|
Enhancement of radiosensitivity by the novel anticancer quinolone derivative vosaroxin in preclinical glioblastoma models. Oncotarget 2018; 8:29865-29886. [PMID: 28415741 PMCID: PMC5444710 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive brain tumor. The activity of vosaroxin, a first-in-class anticancer quinolone derivative that intercalates DNA and inhibits topoisomerase II, was investigated in GBM preclinical models as a single agent and combined with radiotherapy (RT). Results Vosaroxin showed antitumor activity in clonogenic survival assays, with IC50 of 10−100 nM, and demonstrated radiosensitization. Combined treatments exhibited significantly higher γH2Ax levels compared with controls. In xenograft models, vosaroxin reduced tumor growth and showed enhanced activity with RT; vosaroxin/RT combined was more effective than temozolomide/RT. Vosaroxin/RT triggered rapid and massive cell death with characteristics of necrosis. A minor proportion of treated cells underwent caspase-dependent apoptosis, in agreement with in vitro results. Vosaroxin/RT inhibited RT-induced autophagy, increasing necrosis. This was associated with increased recruitment of granulocytes, monocytes, and undifferentiated bone marrow–derived lymphoid cells. Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed adequate blood-brain penetration of vosaroxin. Vosaroxin/RT increased disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) significantly compared with RT, vosaroxin alone, temozolomide, and temozolomide/RT in the U251-luciferase orthotopic model. Materials and Methods Cellular, molecular, and antiproliferative effects of vosaroxin alone or combined with RT were evaluated in 13 GBM cell lines. Tumor growth delay was determined in U87MG, U251, and T98G xenograft mouse models. (DFS) and (OS) were assessed in orthotopic intrabrain models using luciferase-transfected U251 cells by bioluminescence and magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions Vosaroxin demonstrated significant activity in vitro and in vivo in GBM models, and showed additive/synergistic activity when combined with RT in O6-methylguanine methyltransferase-negative and -positive cell lines.
Collapse
|
27
|
Newly diagnosed glioblastoma: adverse socioeconomic factors correlate with delay in radiotherapy initiation and worse overall survival. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2018; 59:i11-i18. [PMID: 29432548 PMCID: PMC5868191 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The optimal time for starting radiation in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate postoperative radiotherapy treatment patterns and the impact of timing of radiotherapy on survival outcomes in patients with GBM using a large, national hospital-based registry in the era of Stupp chemoradiation. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Data Base and identified adults with GBM diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 and treated with chemoradiation. We classified time from surgery/biopsy to radiation start into the following categories: <15 days, 15-21 days, 22-28 days, 29-35 days, 36-42 days and >42 days. We assessed the relation between time to radiation start and survival using Cox proportional hazards modeling adjusting for clinically relevant variables that were selected a priori. We used multivariate logistic modeling to determine factors independently associated with receipt of delayed radiation treatment. A total of 12 738 patients met our inclusion criteria after our cohort selection process. The majority of patients underwent either gross total (n = 5270, 41%) or subtotal (n = 4700, 37%) resection, while 2768 patients (22%) underwent biopsy only. Median time from definitive surgery or biopsy to initiation of radiation was 29 days (interquartile range 24-36 days). For patients who had biopsy or subtotal resection, earlier initiation of radiation did not appear to be associated with improved survival. However, among patients who underwent gross total resection, there appeared to be improved survival with early initiation of radiation. Patients who initiated radiation within 15-21 days of gross total resection had improved survival (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.98, P = 0.03) compared with patients who had delayed (>42 days after surgery) radiation. There was also a trend (P = 0.07 to 0.12) for improved survival for patients who initiated radiation within 22-35 days of gross total resection compared with patients who had delayed radiation. Patients who were black, had Medicaid or other government insurance or were not insured, and who lived in metropolitan areas or further away from the treating facility had higher odds of receiving radiation >35 days after gross total resection. Patients who lived in higher income areas had higher odds of receiving radiation within 35 days of a gross total resection. In a large cohort of patients with GBM treated with chemoradiation, our data suggest a survival benefit in initiating radiotherapy within 35 days after gross total resection. Further research is warranted to understand barriers to timely access to optimal therapy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Impact of Timing of Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Glioblastoma in a Large Hospital Database. Neurosurgery 2017; 83:915-921. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Although the standard of care for glioblastoma remains maximal safe resection followed by chemoradiation, conflicting reports have emerged regarding the importance of the time interval between these 2 treatments.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether differences in the duration between surgery and initiation of chemoradiation for glioblastoma had an impact on overall survival (OS) in a large hospital-based database.
METHODS
The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with glioblastoma between 2010 and 2012 treated with surgery followed by chemoradiation. Patients who received biopsy only were excluded. The time from surgery to initiation of radiation therapy was divided into 4 equal quartiles of ≤24, 25 to 30, 31 to 37, and >37 d. Patient characteristics were compared between groups using Pearson Chi Square and Fisher's Exact test. OS was analyzed via the Kaplan–Meier method and compared via the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression were performed to assess for impact of covariables on OS.
RESULTS
A total of 11 652 patients were included in the analysis. Median duration from surgery to radiation was 30 d. On multivariable regression, black race, larger tumor, gross-total resection, methyguanine-methyl transferase (MGMT+), and treatment at an academic facility were associated with a duration >30 d. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant differences when comparing start within 24 d to 25 to 30 d (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.01, P = .13) or > 37 d (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.03, P = .26), although a small OS improvement was seen if initiated within 31 to 37 d (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.99, P = .02).
CONCLUSION
There was no clear association between duration from surgery to initiation of chemoradiation on OS.
Collapse
|
29
|
Diagnostic ability of intraoperative ultrasound for identifying tumor residual in glioma surgery operation. Oncotarget 2017; 8:73105-73114. [PMID: 29069853 PMCID: PMC5641196 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Achieving total glioma resection represents a major challenge to neurosurgeons with no distinct margin between tumor and surrounding brain tissue. Many imaging methods are employed in surgery visualization and resection control. We performed this meta-analysis to assess the diagnosis value of intraoperative ultrasound and judged whether ultrasound is a suitable tool in detecting glioma residual. The databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Weipu were systematically searched to find out relevant studies and published up to May 5, 2017. A total of 14 studies involving 542 participants met the selection criteria and bivariate mixed effects models were used for analysis. The parameters and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed on Stata 12.0 software. The pooled sensitivity was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.62-0.84), specificity was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.79-0.94), positive likelihood ratios was 6.27 (95%CI: 3.76-10.47), negative likelihood ratios was 0.29 (95%CI: 0.20-0.42), diagnostic odds ratios was 21.83 (95%CI: 14.20-33.55) and area under the curve of summary receiver operator characteristic was 0.89. Stratified meta-analysis showed sensitivity and area under the curve in low-grade glioma were both higher than high-grade glioma. The Deek's plot showed no significant publication bias (t = -1.03, P = 0.33). Intraoperative ultrasound has high overall diagnostic value to identify glioma remnants, especially in low-grade glioma, which shows a benefit for prognosis and life quality of patients. In general, Intraoperative ultrasound is an effective tool for maximizing the extent of glioma resection.
Collapse
|
30
|
Early postoperative tumor progression predicts clinical outcome in glioblastoma-implication for clinical trials. J Neurooncol 2017; 132:249-254. [PMID: 28101701 PMCID: PMC5378726 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2362-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Molecular markers define the diagnosis of glioblastoma in the new WHO classification of 2016, challenging neuro-oncology centers to provide timely treatment initiation. The aim of this study was to determine whether a time delay to treatment initiation was accompanied by signs of early tumor progression in an MRI before the start of radiotherapy, and, if so, whether this influences the survival of glioblastoma patients. Images from 61 patients with early post-surgery MRI and a second MRI just before the start of radiotherapy were examined retrospectively for signs of early tumor progression. Survival information was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and a Cox multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent variables for survival prediction. 59 percent of patients showed signs of early tumor progression after a mean time of 24.1 days from the early post-surgery MRI to the start of radiotherapy. Compared to the group without signs of early tumor progression, which had a mean time of 23.3 days (p = 0.685, Student’s t test), progression free survival was reduced from 320 to 185 days (HR 2.3; CI 95% 1.3–4.0; p = 0.0042, log-rank test) and overall survival from 778 to 329 days (HR 2.9; CI 95% 1.6–5.1; p = 0.0005). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the Karnofsky performance score, O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, and signs of early tumor progression are prognostic markers of overall survival. Early tumor progression at the start of radiotherapy is associated with a worse prognosis for glioblastoma patients. A standardized baseline MRI might allow for better patient stratification.
Collapse
|
31
|
Delaying standard combined chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection does not impact survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. Radiother Oncol 2016; 118:9-15. [PMID: 26791930 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2015] [Revised: 01/02/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the influence of the time interval between surgical resection and standard combined chemoradiotherapy on survival in newly diagnosed and homogeneously treated (surgical resection plus standard combined chemoradiotherapy) glioblastoma patients; while controlling confounding factors (extent of resection, carmustine wafer implantation, functional status, neurological deficit, and postoperative complications). METHODS From 2005 to 2011, 692 adult patients (434 men; mean of 57.5 ± 10.8 years) with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma were enrolled in this retrospective multicentric study. All patients were treated by surgical resection (65.5% total/subtotal resection, 34.5% partial resection; 36.7% carmustine wafer implantation) followed by standard combined chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy at a median dose of 60 Gy, with daily concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide). Time interval to standard combined chemoradiotherapy was analyzed as a continuous variable and as a dichotomized variable using median and quartiles thresholds. Multivariate analyses using Cox modeling were conducted. RESULTS The median progression-free survival was 10.3 months (95% CI, 10.0-11.0). The median overall survival was 19.7 months (95% CI, 18.5-21.0). The median time to initiation of combined chemoradiotherapy was 1.5 months (25% quartile, 1.0; 75% quartile, 2.2; range, 0.1-9.0). On univariate and multivariate analyses, OS and PFS were not significantly influenced by time intervals to adjuvant treatments. On multivariate analysis, female gender, total/subtotal resection and RTOG-RPA classes 3 and 4 were significant independent predictors of improved OS. CONCLUSIONS Delaying standard combined chemoradiotherapy following surgical resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adult patients does not impact survival.
Collapse
|
32
|
Clinical trials for personalized glioblastoma radiotherapy: Markers for efficacy and late toxicity but often delayed treatment – Does that matter? Radiother Oncol 2016; 118:211-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
33
|
Minimizing the uncertainties regarding the effects of delaying radiotherapy for Glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2015; 118:1-8. [PMID: 26700603 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2015] [Revised: 10/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Previous studies have provided no clear conclusions regarding the effects of delaying radiotherapy (RT) in GBM patients. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis to address the effect of delayed RT on the overall survival (OS) of GBM patients. METHODS A systematic search retrieved 19 retrospective studies published between 1975 and 2014 reporting on the waiting time (WT) to RT for GBM patients. The meta-analysis was performed by converting WT to RT studies intervals into a regression coefficient (β) and standard error expressing the effect size on OS per week of delay. RESULTS Data required to calculate the effect size on OS per week of delay were available for 12 studies (5212 patients). A non-adjusted model and a meta-regression model based on well-recognized prognostic factors were performed. No association between WT to RT, per week of delay, and OS was found (HR=0.98; 95% CI 0.90-1.08; p=0.70). The meta-regression adjusted for prognostic factors weighted by the inverse-variance (1/SE(2)) showed no clear evidence of the effect of WT to RT, per week of delay, on OS. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis, despite limitations, provided no evidence of a true effect on OS by delaying RT in GBM patients.
Collapse
|