1
|
Challis B, Kneebone A, Eade T, Guo L, Atyeo J, Brown C, Hruby G. Avoiding prostate bed radiation for the PSMA-PET detected nodal recurrence patient post prostatectomy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2025; 50:100896. [PMID: 39676999 PMCID: PMC11638620 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2024] [Revised: 11/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Nodal only recurrence post radical prostatectomy (RP) is increasingly recognised in the PSMA scan era. Management is controversial with a curative approach usually incorporating prostate bed and nodal irradiation (PB + NRT) in combination with long-term hormonal therapy. It is unknown whether omitting prostate-bed irradiation (PBRT) is safe in a subgroup of these patients. Purpose To document the outcomes for pelvic nodal only salvage radiation therapy (NRT) plus concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for patients with PSMA PET documented nodal relapses. Methods and materials Eligible patients included PSMA PET documented nodal only relapses post RP who received NRT with or without PBRT at Royal North Shore Hospital (NSCC), Gosford Hospital (CCCC) or Genesis Care (GC) between January 2015 and December 2021. Baseline demographics, surgical pathology, radiation details, ADT use and outcomes were documented. Results Forty-six patients were identified, 22 in the PB + NRT cohort and 24 in the NRT cohort. Compared to the PBRT + NRT group, the NRT cohort had lower stage disease (pT2 = 7 (29 %), pT3a = 15 (63 %), pT3b = 1 (4 %) vs pT2 = 0, pT3a = 10 (45 %), pT3b = 12 (55 %)) (p=<0.001) and lower rates of R1 resection (0 % vs 63.6 % (n = 14)) (p < 0.001) respectively. The median follow-up from radiotherapy was 3.9 years.Four-year biochemical failure- free survival (BFFS) was 64 % in the NRT group vs 67 % in the PB + NRT group. Of the ten (41.6 %) failures in the NRT group, 1 (4 %) was a biochemical failure only, 2 (8 %) recurred in the PB and received further salvage treatment, 4 (17 %) had nodal failure outside the pelvis and 3 (13 %) had distant metastases.One patient (4 %) in the NRT group recorded late grade ≥2 GU toxicity compared with 7 (32 %) in the PB + NRT. No patients in the NRT group recorded late grade ≥2 GI toxicity compared with 2 (9 %) in the PB + NRT cohort. Conclusion This study provides early evidence for the feasibility of PBRT sparing to avoid local toxicity. Most patients in this cohort failed distantly. This data suggests that for selected men PB-avoidance may be considered given informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Challis
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Genesis Care, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas Eade
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Genesis Care, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
| | - Lesley Guo
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John Atyeo
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Chris Brown
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - George Hruby
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Genesis Care, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dennstädt F, Putora PM, Iseli T, Treffers T, Panje C, Fischer GF. Patient autonomy and shared decision-making in the context of clinical trial participation. Eur J Clin Invest 2024; 54:e14291. [PMID: 39086071 DOI: 10.1111/eci.14291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to explore how incorporating shared decision-making (SDM) can address recruitment challenges in clinical trials. Specifically, it examines how SDM can align the trial process with patient preferences, enhance patient autonomy and increase active patient participation. Additionally, it identifies potential conflicts between SDM and certain clinical trial aspects, such as randomization or blinding, and proposes solutions to mitigate these issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a comprehensive review of existing literature on patient recruitment challenges in clinical trials and the role of SDM in addressing these challenges. We analysed case studies and trial reports to identify common obstacles and assess the effectiveness of SDM in improving patient accrual. Additionally, we evaluated three proposed solutions: adequate trial design, communication skill training and patient decision aids. RESULTS Our review indicates that incorporating SDM can significantly enhance patient recruitment by promoting patient autonomy and engagement. SDM encourages physicians to adopt a more open and informative approach, which aligns the trial process with patient preferences and reduces psychological barriers such as fear and mental stress. However, implementing SDM can conflict with elements such as randomization and blinding, potentially complicating trial design and execution. DISCUSSION The desire for patient autonomy and active engagement through SDM may clash with traditional clinical trial methodologies. To address these conflicts, we propose three solutions: redesigning trials to better accommodate SDM principles, providing communication skill training for physicians and developing patient decision aids. By focussing on patient wishes and emotions, these solutions can integrate SDM into clinical trials effectively. CONCLUSION Shared decision-making provides a framework that can promote patient recruitment and trial participation by enhancing patient autonomy and engagement. With proper implementation of trial design modifications, communication skill training and patient decision aids, SDM can support rather than hinder clinical trial execution, ultimately contributing to the advancement of evidence-based medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Dennstädt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Iseli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Theresa Treffers
- Seeburg Castle University, Seekirchen am Wallersee, Austria
- TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Cédric Panje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hayek OE, Rais-Bahrami S, McDonald A, Galgano SJ. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Salvage for Lymph Node Recurrent Prostate Cancer in the Era of PSMA PET Imaging. Curr Urol Rep 2023; 24:471-476. [PMID: 37395949 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-023-01174-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Our understanding of patterns of prostate cancer recurrence after primary treatment of localized disease has significantly evolved since the development of positron emission tomography (PET) agents targeting prostate cancer. Previously, most biochemical recurrences were not associated with imaging correlates when restaging with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or bone scintigraphy and, hence, were typically assumed to represent occult metastases. A rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) after previous local therapy prompting a PET scan showing uptake limited to regional lymph nodes is an increasingly common clinical scenario as advanced prostate cancer imaging becomes more widely utilized. The optimal management strategy for patients who have lymph node recurrent prostate cancer is both unclear and evolving, particularly in terms of local and regionally directed therapies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) utilizes ablative radiation doses with steep gradients to achieve local tumor control while sparing nearby normal tissues. SBRT is an attractive therapeutic modality due to its efficacy, favorable toxicity profile, and flexibility to administer elective doses to areas of potential occult involvement. The purpose of this review is to briefly describe how SBRT is being implemented in the era of PSMA PET for the management of solely lymph node recurrent prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS SBRT has been shown to effectively control individual lymph node tumor deposits within the pelvis and retroperitoneum for prostate cancer and is well-tolerated with a favorable toxicity profile. However, a major limitation thus far has been the lack of prospective trials supporting the use of SBRT for oligometastatic nodal recurrent prostate cancer. As further trials are conducted, its exact role in the treatment paradigm of recurrent prostate cancer will be better established. Although PET-guided SBRT appears feasible and potentially beneficial, there is still considerable uncertainty about the use of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) in patients with nodal recurrent oligometastatic prostate cancer. PSMA PET has undoubtedly advanced imaging of recurrent prostate cancer, revealing anatomic correlates for disease recurrence that previously went undetected. At the same time, SBRT continues to be explored in prostate cancer with feasibility, a favorable risk profile, and satisfactory oncologic outcomes. However, much of the existing literature comes from the pre-PSMA PET era and integration of this novel imaging approach has led to greater focus on new and ongoing clinical trials to rigorously evaluate this approach and compare to other established treatment modalities utilized for oligometastatic, nodal recurrence of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar E Hayek
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, Birmingham, USA
| | - Andrew McDonald
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, Birmingham, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, Birmingham, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Briody H, Sheehan M, Hanley M, O'Neill B, Dunne R, Lee MJ, Morrin MM. Biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: rationalisation of the approach to imaging. Clin Radiol 2023; 78:518-524. [PMID: 37085338 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
AIM To assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in addition to the additive benefit of the conventional imaging techniques, computed tomography (CT) and nuclear medicine (NM) bone scintigraphy, for investigation of biochemical recurrence (BCR) post-prostatectomy where access to prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography (PET)-CT is challenging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Relevant imaging over a 5-year period was reviewed. Ethical approval was granted by the internal review board. All patients with suspected BCR, defined as a PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml on two separate occasions, underwent a retrospective imaging review. This was performed on PACS archive search database in a single centre using search terms "PSA" and "prostatectomy" in the three imaging methods; MRI, CT, and NM bone scintigraphy. All PSMA PET CT performed were recorded. RESULTS One hundred and eighty-five patients were identified. Patients with an MRI pelvis that demonstrated distant metastases (i.e., pelvic bone metastases or lymph node involvement more cranial to the bifurcation of the common iliac arteries) were more likely to have a positive CT and/or NM bone scintigraphy. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the findings of M1 disease at MRI pelvis and the presence of distant metastases at CT thorax, abdomen, pelvis and NM bone scintigraphy was calculated at 0.81 (p<0.01) and 0.91 (p<0.01) respectively. CONCLUSION An imaging strategy based on risk stratification and technique-specific selection criteria leads to more appropriate use of resources, and in turn, increases the yield of conventional imaging methods. MRI prostate findings can be used to predict the additive value of CT/NM bone scintigraphy allowing a more streamlined approach to their use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Briody
- Department of Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - M Sheehan
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Hanley
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - B O'Neill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R Dunne
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M J Lee
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M M Morrin
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Asso R, Degrande F, Fernandes da Silva J, Leite E. Postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer: When and how? – An update review. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:742-748. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
6
|
Cozzi S, Botti A, Timon G, Blandino G, Najafi M, Manicone M, Bardoscia L, Ruggieri MP, Ciammella P, Iotti C. Prognostic factors, efficacy, and toxicity of involved-node stereotactic body radiation therapy for lymph node oligorecurrent prostate cancer : An investigation of 117 pelvic lymph nodes. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:700-709. [PMID: 34757443 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01871-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal radiotherapy regimen is not yet defined in the setting of oligorecurrent prostate cancer (oligorPC). There is evidence of high variability in treatment protocols among different centers worldwide, and no international consensus guidelines on treatment volumes, radiation schedules, and techniques. The purpose of the present retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of involved-pelvic-node stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligorPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with pelvic node oligorPC following primary surgery, radical radiotherapy, or salvage radiotherapy for biochemical or local relapse of prostate cancer who underwent involved-node SBRT with biological effective dose (BED) > 100 Gy, with or without concurrent and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), were retrospectively evaluated. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), overall survival (OS), possible prognostic factors, and toxicity outcomes were investigated. RESULTS From November 2012 to December 2019, 74 patients fitted the selection criteria. A total of 117 lesions were treated. Median follow-up was 31 months (range 6-89). Concurrent ADT was administered in 58.1% of patients. The 1‑year, 2‑year, and 3‑year DPFS was 77%, 37%, and 19%, respectively; the 1‑year, 2‑year, and 3‑year OS was 98%, 98%, and 95%, respectively. The presence of a single target lesion was associated with a statistically significant impact on OS. No in-field recurrence occurred. Patients who reached early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir (< 3 months after SBRT) had a lower 3‑year survival (p = 0.004). The value of PSA nadir after SBRT and the time between primary treatment and SBRT had an impact on bPFS. Concomitant ADT was associated with improved DPFS. No acute or early late (> 6 months) genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events of any grade were reported, albeit with relatively short median follow-up. CONCLUSION SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for oligorPC, with a 100% local control rate in our series. It is not possible to clearly assess the opportunity to postpone ADT prescription in patients with two or more nodal metastases. The number of secondary lesions, time-to-nadir PSA, PSA nadir value, and the time interval between primary treatment and SBRT were identified as prognostic factors. Future prospective randomized studies are desirable to better understand the still open questions regarding the oligorecurrent prostate cancer state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giorgia Timon
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Gladys Blandino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Masoumeh Najafi
- Department of Radiation Oncology Shohadaye Haft-e-Tir Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Teheran, Iran
| | - Moana Manicone
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lilia Bardoscia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, S. Luca Hospital, Healtcare Company Tuscany Nord Ovest, Lucca, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Ruggieri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodrigues I, Ferreira C, Gonçalves J, Carvalho L, Oliveira J, Castro C, Oliveira Â. Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer - outcomes and optimization strategies. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26:535-544. [PMID: 34434569 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Salvage radiotherapy (sRT) is the main potentially curative treatment after biochemical failure/locoregional relapse post-radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of the study was to characterize the population who underwent sRT after RP at our Department, to understand the influence of several potential prognosis factors, and to determine possible optimization strategies. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing sRT at our department between 2012 and 2017, evaluating patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, restaging procedures and clinical outcomes - namely biochemical relapse-free survival (BC-RFS), clinical relapse-free survival (C-RFS), additional hormone therapy-free survival (HT-FS) and overall survival (OS). We assessed potential prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate models (MVA). Results We included 277 patients (median age 68 years). Median pre-sRT PSA was > 0.5ng/mL in 54.9%. All underwent prostate bed irradiation. Pelvic lymph nodes were included in 9.7%. Outcome analysis was performed for 264 patients (35.6 months median follow-up). At 3 years, BC-RFS was 61.4%, C-RFS was 81.3%, HT-FS was 79.9% and OS was 96.6%. Most relapses occurred in regional lymph nodes only (47.9% patients who relapsed). On MVA, lymphovascular invasion, advanced pT-stages and negative margins negatively influenced BC-RFS (p = 0.029, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) and HT-FS (p = 0.001, p = 0.029 and p = 0.002). C-RFS was worsened by lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.009) and negative margins (p = 0.015). These had no effect on OS. BC-RFS and HT-FS were improved when sRT started while PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL (p < 0.05). Conclusion Lymphovascular invasion, higher pT-stages and negative margins negatively affected prognosis. An early start of sRT (PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL) predicted better BC-RFS and HT-FS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Rodrigues
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Carolina Ferreira
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal.,Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| | - Joana Gonçalves
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal.,Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| | - Luísa Carvalho
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Jorge Oliveira
- Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| | - Carla Castro
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal.,Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| | - Ângelo Oliveira
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal.,Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dennstädt F, Treffers T, Iseli T, Panje C, Putora PM. Creation of clinical algorithms for decision-making in oncology: an example with dose prescription in radiation oncology. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:212. [PMID: 34247596 PMCID: PMC8274051 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01568-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
In oncology, decision-making in individual situations is often very complex. To deal with such complexity, people tend to reduce it by relying on their initial intuition. The downside of this intuitive, subjective way of decision-making is that it is prone to cognitive and emotional biases such as overestimating the quality of its judgements or being influenced by one’s current mood. Hence, clinical predictions based on intuition often turn out to be wrong and to be outperformed by statistical predictions. Structuring and objectivizing oncological decision-making may thus overcome some of these issues and have advantages such as avoidance of unwarranted clinical practice variance or error-prevention. Even for uncertain situations with limited medical evidence available or controversies about the best treatment option, structured decision-making approaches like clinical algorithms could outperform intuitive decision-making. However, the idea of such algorithms is not to prescribe the clinician which decision to make nor to abolish medical judgement, but to support physicians in making decisions in a systematic and structured manner. An example for a use-case scenario where such an approach may be feasible is the selection of treatment dose in radiation oncology. In this paper, we will describe how a clinical algorithm for selection of a fractionation scheme for palliative irradiation of bone metastases can be created. We explain which steps in the creation process of a clinical algorithm for supporting decision-making need to be performed and which challenges and limitations have to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Dennstädt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - Theresa Treffers
- Seeburg Castle University, Seekirchen am Wallersee, Austria.,TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Iseli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Panje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pocard M, Mirshahi M, Therwath A. The hallmarks of oligometastatic diseases: Solution for the treatment dilemma. SURGERY OPEN DIGESTIVE ADVANCE 2021; 2:100012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soda.2021.100012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2025]
|
10
|
Vogel MME, Dewes S, Sage EK, Devecka M, Gschwend JE, Eiber M, Combs SE, Schiller K. A survey among German-speaking radiation oncologists on PET-based radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:82. [PMID: 33933111 PMCID: PMC8088662 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01811-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Positron emission tomography-(PET) has evolved as a powerful tool to guide treatment for prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this survey was to evaluate the acceptance and use of PET—especially with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting tracers—in clinical routine for radiotherapy (RT) and the impact on target volume definition and dose prescription. Methods We developed an online survey, which we distributed via e-mail to members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). The survey included questions on patterns of care of RT for PC with/without PET. For evaluation of doses we used the equivalent dose at fractionation of 2 Gy with α/β = 1.5 Gy [EQD2(1.5 Gy)].
Results From 109 participants, 78.9% have the possibility to use PET for RT planning. Most centers use PSMA-targeting tracers (98.8%). In 39.5%, PSMA-PET for biochemical relapse after prior surgery is initiated at PSA ≥ 0.5 ng/mL, while 30.2% will perform PET at ≥ 0.2 ng/mL (≥ 1.0 ng/mL: 16.3%, ≥ 2.0 ng/mL: 2.3%, regardless of PSA: 11.7%). In case of PET-positive local recurrence (LR) and pelvic lymph nodes (LNs), 97.7% and 96.5% of the participants will apply an escalated dose. The median total dose in EQD2(1.5 Gy) was 70.00 Gy (range: 56.89–85.71) for LR and 62.00 Gy (range: 52.61–80.00) for LNs. A total number of ≤ 3 (22.0%) or ≤ 5 (20.2%) distant lesions was most often described as applicable for the definition as oligometastatic PC. Conclusion PSMA-PET is widely used among German radiation oncologists. However, specific implications on treatment planning differ among physicians. Therefore, further trials and guidelines for PET-based RT are warranted. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01811-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Sabrina Dewes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva K Sage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Devecka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zilli T, Dirix P, Heikkilä R, Liefhooghe N, Siva S, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Everaerts W, Otte F, Shelan M, Mercier C, Achard V, Thon K, Stellamans K, Moon D, Conde-Moreno A, Papachristofilou A, Scorsetti M, Gückenberger M, Ameye F, Zapatero A, Van De Voorde L, López Campos F, Couñago F, Jaccard M, Spiessens A, Semac I, Vanhoutte F, Goetghebeur E, Reynders D, Ost P. The Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2 PEACE V-STORM Trial: Defining the Best Salvage Treatment for Oligorecurrent Nodal Prostate Cancer Metastases. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 7:241-244. [PMID: 33386290 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Optimal local treatment for nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer is unknown. The randomized phase 2 PEACE V-STORM trial will explore the best treatment approach in this setting. Early results on the acute toxicity profile are projected to be published in quarter 3, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Reino Heikkilä
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nick Liefhooghe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Epworth Healthcare and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - François Otte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute and Hôpital Erasme, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carole Mercier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kristian Thon
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karin Stellamans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Daniel Moon
- Royal Melbourne Clinical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Antonio Conde-Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCSS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Matthias Gückenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Filip Ameye
- Department of Urology, AZ Maria-Middelares, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Fernando López Campos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Quironsalud, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maud Jaccard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - An Spiessens
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Semac
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Vanhoutte
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Els Goetghebeur
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dries Reynders
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ingrosso G, Mariucci C, Tenti MV, Bini V, Alì E, Saldi S, Palumbo I, Bellavita R, Aristei C. Salvage radiotherapy in patients affected by oligorecurrent pelvic nodal prostate cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 22:2236-2243. [PMID: 32418156 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02364-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is an investigational treatment option in patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this retrospective study is to report oncologic outcome and toxicity of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) in PCa patients affected by pelvic nodal oligorecurrence. METHODS 41 consecutive patients were treated with salvage radiotherapy. At biochemical recurrence after primary treatment, oligorecurrent disease was detected by positron emission tomography (PET) in 94% of the patients. Image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was delivered using tomotherapy. 83% of the patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with ENRT. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test was used to analyze associations between survival end-points and clinical parameters. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Toxicity was registered according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. RESULTS The median at follow-up was 33.6 months. At 3 years, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS) were 89%, 92%, and 53%, respectively. At univariate analysis, all survival end-points were correlated with the number of positive pelvic lymph nodes at oligorecurrence (≤ 3 vs > 3). Biochemical-PFS was correlated with PSA (p = 0.034) and PSA doubling time (p = 0.004) at oligorecurrence. At multivariate analysis, no independent variable was statistically significant. No patient experienced grade ≥ 2 late toxicity after radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The number of metastatic lymph nodes and PSA doubling time seems to be important prognostic factors in the pelvic oligorecurrent setting. Salvage radiotherapy combined with short-course ADT might be a valid treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - C Mariucci
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - M V Tenti
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - V Bini
- Internal Medicine, Endocrine and Metabolic Science Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - E Alì
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - S Saldi
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - I Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - R Bellavita
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - C Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Achard V, Bottero M, Rouzaud M, Lancia A, Scorsetti M, Filippi AR, Franzese C, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Ingrosso G, Ost P, Zilli T. Radiotherapy treatment volumes for oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer: a systematic review. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1224-1234. [PMID: 32536241 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1775291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is an emerging treatment strategy for nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, large heterogeneities exist in the RT regimens used, with series reporting the use of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) strategies and others the delivery of focal treatments to the relapsing nodes with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT). In this systematic review of the literature we compared the oncological outcomes and toxicity of the different RT regimens for nodal oligorecurrent PCa patients, with the aim of defining the optimal RT target volume in this setting. METHODS We performed a systemic search on the Pubmed database to identify articles reporting on the use of ENRT or SBRT for oligometastatic PCa with nodal recurrence. RESULTS Twenty-two articles were analyzed, including four prospective phase II trials (3 with SBRT and 1 with ENRT). Focal SBRT, delivered with an involved node, involved site, and involved field modality, was the most commonly used strategy with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 16 to 58% and a very low toxicity profile. Improved PFS rates were observed with ENRT strategies (52-80% at 3 years) compared to focal SBRT, despite a slightly higher toxicity rate. One ongoing randomized phase II trial is comparing both modalities in patients with nodal oligorecurrent PCa. CONCLUSIONS With a large variability in patterns of practice, the optimal RT strategy remains to be determined in the setting of nodal oligorecurrent PCa. Ongoing randomized trials and advances in translational research will help to shed light on the best management for these patients. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marta Bottero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tor Vergata General Hospital, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Michel Rouzaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
De Bruycker A, Spiessens A, Dirix P, Koutsouvelis N, Semac I, Liefhooghe N, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Everaerts W, Otte F, Papachristofilou A, Scorsetti M, Shelan M, Siva S, Ameye F, Guckenberger M, Heikkilä R, Putora PM, Zapatero A, Conde-Moreno A, Couñago F, Vanhoutte F, Goetghebeur E, Reynders D, Zilli T, Ost P. PEACE V - Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): a study protocol for a randomized controlled phase II trial. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:406. [PMID: 32398040 PMCID: PMC7216526 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06911-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic nodal recurrences are being increasingly diagnosed with the introduction of new molecular imaging techniques, like choline and PSMA PET-CT, in the restaging of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). At this moment, there are no specific treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used, mostly by means of metastasis-directed therapies (MDT): salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Since the majority of patients treated with MDT relapse within 2 years in adjacent lymph node regions, with an estimated median time to progression of 12-18 months, combining MDT with whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) may improve oncological outcomes in these patients. The aim of this prospective multicentre randomized controlled phase II trial is to assess the impact of the addition of WPRT to MDT and short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on metastasis-free survival (MFS) in the setting of oligorecurrent pelvic nodal recurrence. METHODS & DESIGN Patients diagnosed with PET-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (≤5 nodes) following radical local treatment for PCa, will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between arm A: MDT and 6 months of ADT, or arm B: WPRT added to MDT and 6 months of ADT. Patients will be stratified by type of PET-tracer (choline, FACBC or PSMA) and by type of MDT (sLND or SBRT). The primary endpoint is MFS and the secondary endpoints include clinical and biochemical progression-free survival (PFS), prostate cancer specific survival, quality of life (QoL), toxicity and time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and to palliative ADT. Estimated study completion: December 31, 2023. DISCUSSION This is the first prospective multicentre randomized phase II trial assessing the potential of combined WPRT and MDT as compared to MDT alone on MFS for patients with nodal oligorecurrent PCa. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03569241, registered June 14, 2018, ; Identifier on Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP): SNCTP000002947, registered June 14, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A De Bruycker
- Department of Radiation oncology and experimental cancer research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - A Spiessens
- Department of Radiation oncology and experimental cancer research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - P Dirix
- Department of Radiation oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, GZ Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - N Koutsouvelis
- Department of Radiation oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - I Semac
- Department of Radiation oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Clinical Research Center, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - N Liefhooghe
- Department of Radiation oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - A Gomez-Iturriaga
- Cruces University Hospital (Biocruces Health Research Institute), Barakaldo, Spain
| | - W Everaerts
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Otte
- Department of Radiation oncology, Jules Bordet Institute and Hôpital Erasme, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Papachristofilou
- Clinic of Radiotherapy & Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Scorsetti
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCSS, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Shelan
- Department of Radiation oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Siva
- Epworth Healthcare, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - F Ameye
- Department of Urology, AZ Maria-Middelares Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - R Heikkilä
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - P M Putora
- Department of Radiation oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - A Zapatero
- University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Conde-Moreno
- Department of Radiation oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - F Couñago
- Department of Radiation oncology, University Hospital of Quirón, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Vanhoutte
- Department of Radiation oncology and experimental cancer research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Goetghebeur
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Reynders
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - T Zilli
- Department of Radiation oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - P Ost
- Department of Radiation oncology and experimental cancer research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|