Dosimetric study between a single isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy technique and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases treatment: impact of target volume geometrical characteristics

Impact of MLC error on dose distribution in SRS treatment of single-isocenter multiple brain metastases: comparison between DCAT and VMAT techniques

Background

Dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can achieve near equal plan quality in single-isocenter multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. This study aimed to investigate the impact of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) errors during beam delivery on the dose distribution for each technique.

Materials and methods

A 10-mm diameter delineation of the three targets was employed on the computed tomography images of a head phantom, and the reference plans were created using the DCAT and VMAT. We simulated the systematic opened and closed MLC errors. 10 MLC error plans with different magnitudes of errors were created in each technique. We investigated the relationship between the magnitude of MLC errors and the change in dose-volume histogram parameters of the targets and normal brain tissue.

Results

The percentage change in the D98% (Gy) and D0.1% (Gy) of the target per millimeter of the MLC errors were 13.3% and 2.7% for the DCAT and 15.3% and 9.3% for the VMAT, respectively. The fluctuations of the maximum dose were very small for the DCAT compared to the VMAT. Changes in the V12Gy (cc) of the normal brain tissue were 47.1%/mm and 53.2%/mm for the DCAT and VMAT, respectively, which are comparable changes for both techniques.

Conclusions

Although the impact of MLC errors on the target coverage and the normal brain tissue is comparable for both techniques, the internal dose of the targets generated by the DCAT technique is robust to the MLC errors.

Selection criteria for circular collimator- vs. Multileaf collimator-based plans in robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases and benign intracranial disease: Impact of target size, shape complexity, and proximity to at-risk organs

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the selection criteria for circular collimator (CC)- and multileaf collimator (MLC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) plans for brain metastases (BM) and benign intracranial disease (BID) in terms of geometric parameters using CyberKnife (CK).

METHODS

Forty-eight and eighty-five patients with BM and BID, respectively, were included. Two plans using CC and MLC were created for each case. Six dosimetric parameters and mathematical scores (MS) were extracted from each plan to assess plan quality. Two geometric parameters in BM-equivalent radius (rGTV) and sphericity index (SI) of the gross tumor volume-and three in BID-rGTV, SI, and the distance between the GTV and organ at risk (dOAR)-were calculated. Their effect on the superiority of CC- or MLC-based plans in terms of dosimetric parameters and MS was evaluated using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

The rGTV was associated with improved dosimetric parameters of MLC-based plans, especially the GTV conformity in BM and BID cases (β: 0.70 and 0.51) and the OAR sparing in BM cases (β: 0.82), where β represents the regression coefficient. Based on the MS, where the weights for the GTV coverage and OAR sparing were equal, the thresholds at which the MLC-based plans become comparable or superior to the CC-based plans in BM and BID were rGTV > 7.6 and >17.5 mm, respectively. Meanwhile, SI and dOAR were weakly correlated (β ≤ 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

In SRS/SRT plans for BM and BID cases using CyberKnife, geometric parameters, especially rGTV, must be considered when selecting CC or MLC.

Dosimetric comparison of gamma knife and linear accelerator (VMAT and IMRT) plans of SBRT of Lung tumours

This study evaluates dosimetric differences in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors using plans of Gamma Knife, and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) plans based on Linear Accelerator, aiming to inform the reader of appropriate treatment strategy selection. Ten patients with 23 lung tumor lesions treated with SBRT at Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University were analyzed. Plans of Gamma Knife, and VMAT, IMRT plans based on Linear Accelerator were created for each lesion, totaling 18 plans per type. Lesions were treated with 30-50 Gy in 5-10 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, including gradient index (GI), heterogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and doses to the plan target volumes (PTVs), the gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared. Plans of Gamma Knife showed superior HI and GI, higher PTV and GTV doses, and reduced doses to the ipsilateral and contralateral lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, and heart compared to VMAT and IMRT plans (p < 0.05). However, Plans of Gamma Knife required longer delivery times. When comparing VMAT and IMRT plans, VMAT plans had shorter delivery times than IMRT plans, but required more monitor units (MUs). Additionally, IMRT plans delivered a lower mean dose to the ipsilateral lung compared to VMAT plans. Gamma Knife SBRT plans achieves steeper dose falloff and minimizes radiation to normal lung tissue compared to VMAT and IMRT plans, but with longer delivery times. VMAT and IMRT plans displayed similar dose distributions for lung SBRT.

Insights into the dosimetric and geometric characteristics of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

GammaKnife (GK) and CyberKnife (CK) have been the mainstay stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) solution for multiple brain metastases (MBM) for several years. Recent technological advancement has seen an increase in single-isocentre C-arm linac-based SRS. This systematic review focuses on dosimetric and geometric insights into contemporary MBM SRS and thereby establish if linac-based SRS has matured to match the mainstay SRS delivery systems.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were interrogated which yielded 891 relevant articles that narrowed to 20 articles after removing duplicates and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary studies which reported the use of SRS for treatment of MBM SRS and reported the technical aspects including dosimetry were included. The review was limited to English language publications from January 2015 to August 2023. Only full-length papers were included in the final analysis. Opinion papers, commentary pieces, letters to the editor, abstracts, conference proceedings and editorials were excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The reporting of conformity indices (CI) and gradient indices, V12Gy, monitor units and the impact of translational and rotational shifts were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

The single-isocentre technique for MBM dominated recent SRS studies and the most studied delivery platforms were Varian. The C-arm linac-based SRS plan quality and normal brain tissue sparing was comparable to GK and CK and in some cases better. The most used nominal beam energy was 6FFF, and optimised couch and collimator angles could reduce mean normal brain dose by 11.3%. Reduction in volume of the healthy brain receiving a certain dose was dependent on the number and size of the metastases and the relative geometric location. GK and CK required 4.5-8.4 times treatment time compared with linac-based SRS. Rotational shifts caused larger changes in CI in C-arm linac-based single-isocentre SRS.

CONCLUSION

C-arm linac-based SRS produced comparable MBM plan quality and the delivery is notably shorter compared to GK and CK SRS.

Impact of setup errors on the robustness of linac-based single-isocenter coplanar and non-coplanar VMAT plans for multiple brain metastases

PURPOSE

Patient setup errors have been a primary concern impacting the dose delivery accuracy in radiation therapy. A robust treatment plan might mitigate the effects of patient setup errors. In this reported study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of translational and rotational errors on the robustness of linac-based, single-isocenter, coplanar, and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plans for multiple brain metastases.

METHODS

Fifteen patients were retrospectively selected for this study with a combined total of 49 gross tumor volumes (GTVs). Single-isocenter coplanar and non-coplanar plans were generated first with a prescribed dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions or 42 Gy in 7 fractions to cover 95% of planning target volume (PTV). Next, four setup errors (+1  and +2 mm translation, and +1° and +2° rotation) were applied individually to generate modified plans. Different plan quality evaluation metrics were compared between coplanar and non-coplanar plans. 3D gamma analysis (3%/2 mm) was performed to compare the modified plans (+2 mm and +2° only) and the original plans. Paired t-test was conducted for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

After applying setup errors, variations of all plan evaluation metrics were similar (p > 0.05). The worst case for V100% to GTV was 92.07% ± 6.13% in the case of +2 mm translational error. 3D gamma pass rates were > 90% for both coplanar (+2 mm and +2°) and the +2 mm non-coplanar groups but was 87.40% ± 6.89% for the +2° non-coplanar group.

CONCLUSION

Translational errors have a greater impact on PTV and GTV dose coverage for both planning methods. Rotational errors have a greater negative impact on gamma pass rates of non-coplanar plans. Plan evaluation metrics after applying setup errors showed that both coplanar and non-coplanar plans were robust and clinically acceptable.

A high-resolution large-area detector for quality assurance in radiotherapy

Hadron therapy is an advanced radiation modality for treating cancer, which currently uses protons and carbon ions. Hadrons allow for a highly conformal dose distribution to the tumour, minimising the detrimental side-effects due to radiation received by healthy tissues. Treatment with hadrons requires sub-millimetre spatial resolution and high dosimetric accuracy. This paper discusses the design, fabrication and performance tests of a detector based on Gas Electron Multipliers (GEM) coupled to a matrix of thin-film transistors (TFT), with an active area of 60 × 80 mm2 and 200 ppi resolution. The experimental results show that this novel detector is able to detect low-energy (40 kVp X-rays), high-energy (6 MeV) photons used in conventional radiation therapy and protons and carbon ions of clinical energies used in hadron therapy. The GEM-TFT is a compact, fully scalable, radiation-hard detector that measures secondary electrons produced by the GEMs with sub-millimetre spatial resolution and a linear response for proton currents from 18 pA to 0.7 nA. Correcting known detector defects may aid in future studies on dose uniformity, LET dependence, and different gas mixture evaluation, improving the accuracy of QA in radiotherapy.

The Impact of Multileaf Collimator Size on Single Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arcs-Based Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

To compare the plan quality of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between 2.5-mm and 5-mm multileaf collimator (MLC) and investigate the factors' influence on the differences by MLC size.

METHODS

Seventy-six treatment plans including 145 targets calculated with a single isocenter multiple noncoplanar dynamic conformal arc (DCA) technique using automatic multiple brain metastases (MBM) treatment planning system. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), lesion underdosage volume factor (LUF), healthy tissue overdose volume factor (HTOF), geometric conformity index (g), and mean dose to normal organs were compared between 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC. Then the factors that influenced the differences of these parameters were investigated. The impact of target size was also investigated for CI and GI values of individual targets (n=145), and differences between 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC were analyzed.

RESULTS

All parameters except for LUF were significantly better in plans with 2.5 mm MLC. Target size was a significant factor for difference in HTOF, and distance between targets was a significant factor for difference in brain dose and GI. Among 145 metastases, the average inverse CI was 1.35 and 1.47 with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC, respectively (p<0.001). The average GI was 3.21 and 3.53, respectively (p<0.001). For individual targets, target size was a significant factor in CI and GI both with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC (p-value: <0.001, each). CI and GI were significantly better with 2.5-mm than 5-mm MLC. CI was almost >0.67 except for ≤5mm targets with 5-mm MLC. Also, GI was almost smaller than 3.0 for >10 mm targets both with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC.

CONCLUSIONS

MBM with 5-mm MLC was almost fine. However, it may be better to use a conservative margin for larger metastases. It may also be better to avoid SRS with 5-mm MLC for patients with ≤5 mm target size.

Comparative study of dynamic conformal arc therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for treating single brain metastases: A retrospective analysis of dosimetric and clinical outcomes

Background and purpose

Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is commonly used to treat brain metastases (BMs). This retrospective study compared two SRT techniques, dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), for single BM treatments.

Material and methods

Data of patients treated between January 2010 and June 2020 were considered. Patients with multiple BMs, resected BMs, reirradiation, whole-brain radiation therapy and brainstem metastases were excluded. We focused our analysis on 97 patients who received 23.1 Gy in three fractions. Acute toxicities and follow-up outcomes were recorded. Dosimetric data were analyzed in two subgroups (PTV ≤ 10 cc and PTV > 10 cc).

Results

DCAT and VMAT were used in 70 (72.2 %) and 27 (27.8 %) patients, respectively. Acute toxicities were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.259), and no difference was detected in the incidence rate of radionecrosis, local recurrence and cerebral recurrence (p > 0.999, p > 0.999 and p = 0.682, respectively). PTV coverage was better with DCAT for small volumes (PTV ≤ 10 cc). Mean conformity index (CI) was significantly higher with VMAT and mean gradient index (GI) was significantly lower with DCAT whatever volume subgroups (p < 0.001). DCAT had more heterogeneous plans and VMAT required more monitor units. DCAT resulted in reduced low and intermediate doses, whereas VMAT led to decreased high doses.

Conclusion

DCAT and VMAT are two effective and safe SRT techniques for BMs treatment. In the era of re-irradiation, it is important to reduce the doses delivered to healthy tissues. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Single isocenter dynamic conformal arcs-based radiosurgery for brain metastases: Dosimetric comparison with Cyberknife and clinical investigation

Purpose

To compare the dosimetric quality of automatic multiple brain metastases planning (MBM) with that of Cyberknife (CK) based on the clinical tumor condition, such as the tumor number, size, and location.

Methods

76 treatment plans for 46 patients treated with CK were recalculated with the MBM treatment planning system. Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), lesion underdosage volume factor (LUF), healthy tissue overdose volume factor (HTOF), geometric conformity index (g) and mean dose to normal organs were compared between CK and MBM for tumor number, size, shape and distance from the brainstem or chiasm.

Results

The results showed that the mean brain dose was significantly smaller in MBM than CK. CI did not differ between MBM and CK; however, HI was significantly more ideal in CK (p = 0.000), and GI was significantly smaller in MBM (P = 0.000). LUF was larger in CK (p = 0.000) and HTOF and g was larger in MBM (p = 0.003, and 0.012). For single metastases, CK had significantly better HTOF (p = 0.000) and g (p = 0.002), but there were no differences for multiple tumors. Brain dose in MBM was significantly lower and CI was higher for tumors < 30 mm (p = 0.000 and 0.000), whereas HTOF and g for tumors < 10 mm were significantly smaller in CK (p = 0.041 and p = 0.016). Among oval tumors, brain dose, GI and LUF were smaller in MBM, but HTOF and g were smaller in CK. There were no particular trends for tumors close to the brainstem, but HTOF tended to be smaller in CK (0.03 vs. 0.29, p = 0.068) for tumors inside the brainstem.

Conclusions

MBM can reduce the brain dose while achieving a dose distribution quality equivalent to that with CK.

Plan quality assessment of modern radiosurgery technologies in the treatment of multiple brain metastases

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of multiple brain metastases has evolved over the last 40 years allowing centres to treat an increasing number of brain metastases in a single treatment fraction. HyperArcTMplanning optimisation technique is one such development that streamlines the treatment of multiple metastases with a single isocentre. Several studies have investigated the plan quality of HyperArc compared to CyberKnife or Gamma Knife, however there are limited number of studies that include all three modalities. It is the aim of this study to provide an assessment of plan quality between the three SRS platforms across ten patients with multiple brain metastases ranging from three to eight metastases per patient. Strict planning workflows were established to avoid bias towards any particular treatment platform. Plan quality was assessed through dose to organs at risk, Paddick conformity index (PCI), gradient index (GI), global efficiency index (Gη) and dose to normal brain tissue. Results from this study found mean PCI observed across Gamma Knife plans was significantly lower than HyperArc and CyberKnife. HyperArc plans observed significantly shorter beam-on times which were 10 to 20 times faster than CyberKnife and Gamma Knife plans. Gamma Knife and CyberKnife were found to produce plans with significantly superior GI, global efficiency index and the volume of healthy brain receiving greater than 12 Gy (V12Gy) when compared to HyperArc plans. Lesion volume was seen to influence the relative difference in dose metrics between systems. The study revealed that all three treatment modalities produced high quality plans for the SRS treatment of multiple brain metastases, each with respective benefits and limitations.

A multi-centre stereotactic radiosurgery planning study of multiple brain metastases using isocentric linear accelerators with 5 and 2.5 mm width multi-leaf collimators, CyberKnife and Gamma Knife

Objectives

This study compared plans of high definition (HD), 2.5 mm width multi-leaf collimator (MLC), to standard, 5 mm width, isocentric linear accelerator (linacs), CyberKnife (CK), and Gamma Knife (GK) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) techniques on multiple brain metastases.

Methods

Eleven patients undergoing SRS for multiple brain metastases were chosen. Targets and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated and optimized SRS plans were generated and compared.

Results

The linacs delivered similar conformity index (CI) values, but the gradient index (GI) for HD MLCs was significantly lower (P-value <.001). Half the OARs received significantly lower dose using HD MLCs. CK delivered a significantly lower CI than HD MLC linac (P-value <.001), but a significantly higher GI (P-value <.001). CI was significantly improved with the HD MLC linac compared to GK (P-value = 4.591 × 10-3), however, GK delivered a significantly lower GI (P-value <.001). OAR dose sparing was similar for the HD MLC TL, CK, and GK.

Conclusions

Comparing linacs for SRS, the preferred choice is HD MLCs. Similar results were achieved with the HD MLC linac, CK, or GK, with each delivering significant improvements in different aspects of plan quality.

Advances in knowledge

This article is the first to compare HD and standard width MLC linac plans using a combination of single isocentre volumetric modulated arc therapy and multi-isocentric dynamic conformal arc plans as required, which is a more clinically relevant assessment. Furthermore, it compares these plans with CK and GK, assessing the relative merits of each technique.

Understanding the Effect of Prescription Isodose in Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery on Plan Quality and Clinical Outcomes for Solid Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is wide variation in treatment planning strategy for central nervous system (CNS) stereotactic radiosurgery. We sought to understand what relationships exist between intratumor maximum dose and local control (LC) or CNS toxicity, and dosimetric effects of constraining hotspots on plan quality of multiple metastases volumetric modulated arc therapy radiosurgery plans.

METHODS

We captured brain metastases from 2015 to 2017 treated with single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy radiosurgery. Included tumors received single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery, had no previous surgery or radiation, and available follow-up imaging. Our criterion for local failure was 25% increase in tumor diameter on follow-up MRI or pathologic confirmation of tumor recurrence. We defined significant CNS toxicity as Radiation Therapy Oncology Group irreversible Grade 3 or higher. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses evaluating factors affecting LC. We examined 10 stereotactic radiosurgery plans with prescriptions of 18 Gy to all targets originally planned without constraints on the maximum dose within the tumor. We replanned each with a constraint of Dmax 120%. We compared V50%, mean brain dose, and Dmax between plans.

RESULTS

Five hundred and thirty tumors in 116 patients were available for analysis. Median prescription dose was 18 Gy, and median prescription isodose line (IDL) was 73%. Kaplan-Meier estimate of 12-month LC only tumor volume (HR 1.43 [1.22-1.68] P < .001) was predictive of local failure on univariate analysis; prescription IDL and histology were not. In multivariate analysis, tumor volume impacted local failure (HR 1.43 [1.22-1.69] P < .001) but prescription IDL did not (HR 0.95 [0.86-1.05] P = .288). Only a single grade 3 and 2 grade 4 toxicities were observed; tumor volume was predictive of CNS toxicity (HR 1.58 [1.25-2.00]; P < .001), whereas prescription IDL was not (HR 1.01 [0.87-1.17] P = .940).

CONCLUSION

The prescription isodose line had no impact on local tumor control or CNS toxicity. Penalizing radiosurgery hotspots resulted in worse radiosurgery plans with poorer gradient. Limiting maximum dose in gross tumor causes increased collateral exposure to surrounding tissue and should be avoided.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases: A Review of Treatment Techniques

The advancement of systemic targeted treatments has led to improvements in the management of metastatic disease, particularly in terms of survival outcomes. However, brain metastases remain less responsive to systemic therapies, underscoring the significance of local interventions for comprehensive disease control. Over the past years, the threshold for treating brain metastases through stereotactic radiosurgery has risen. Yet, as the number of treated metastases increases, treatment complexity and duration also escalate. This trend has made multi-isocenter radiosurgery treatments, such as those with the Gamma Knife, challenging to plan and lengthy for patients. In contrast, single-isocenter approaches employing linear accelerators offer an efficient and expeditious treatment option. This review delves into the literature, comparing different linear-accelerator-based techniques with each other and in relation to dedicated systems, focusing on dosimetric considerations and feasibility.

Benchmarking Tests of Contemporary SRS Platforms: Have Technological Developments Resulted in Improved Treatment Plan Quality?

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery treatment delivery can be performed with a range of devices, each of which have evolved over recent years. We sought to evaluate the differences in performance of contemporary stereotactic radiosurgery platforms and also to compare them with earlier platform iterations from a previous benchmarking study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The following platforms were selected as "state of the art" in 2022: Gamma Knife Icon (GK), CyberKnife S7 (CK), Brainlab Elements (Elekta VersaHD and Varian TrueBeam), Varian Edge with HyperArc (HA), and Zap-X. Six benchmarking cases were used from a 2016 study. To reflect the evolution of increasing numbers of metastases treated per patient, a 14-target case was added. The 28 targets among the 7 patients ranged from 0.02 to 7.2 cc in volume. Participating centers were sent images and contours for each patient and asked to plan them to the best of their ability. Although some variation in local practice was allowed (eg, margins), groups were asked to prescribe a specified dose to each target and tolerance doses to organs at risk were agreed upon. Parameters compared included coverage, selectivity, Paddick conformity index, gradient index (GI), R50%, efficiency index, doses to organs at risk, and planning and treatment times.

RESULTS

Mean coverage for all targets ranged from 98.2% (Brainlab/Elekta) to 99.7% (HA-6X). Paddick conformity index values ranged from 0.722 (Zap-X) to 0.894 (CK). GI ranged from a mean of 3.52 (GK), representing the steepest dose gradient, to 5.08 (HA-10X). The GI appeared to follow a trend with beam energy, with the lowest values from the lower energy platforms (GK, 1.25 MeV; Zap-X, 3 MV) and the highest value from the highest energy (HA-10X). Mean R50% values ranged from 4.48 (GK) to 5.98 (HA-10X). Treatment times were lowest for C-arm linear accelerators.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with earlier studies, newer equipment appears to deliver higher quality treatments. CyberKnife and linear accelerator platforms appear to give higher conformity whereas lower energy platforms yield a steeper dose gradient.

A novel weight optimized dynamic conformal arcs with TrueBeam™ Linac for very small tumors (≤1 cc) with single isocenter of multiple brain metastases (2≤, ≥4) in stereotactic radiosurgery: A comparison with volumetric modulated arc therapy

Introduction

We evaluated whether improved increase delivery efficiency of weight optimized dynamic conformal arc (WO-DCA) therapy in comparison to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with single isocenter for SRS treatment of very small volume and multiple brain metastases (BMs).

Materials and Methods

20 patients having a less than 1 cc volume and 2≤, ≥4 of multiple BMs, redesigned for 20 Gy in 1 fraction using WO-DCA and VMAT techniques with double full coplanar and three partial noncoplanar arcs. Plan qualities were compared using tumor coverage, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V4Gy, V10Gy, and V12Gy volumes of brain, monitor units (MUs), and percent of quality assurance pass rate (QA%).

Results

Both techniques satisfied clinical requirements in coverage and CI. VMAT had a significantly higher MU and mean GI than WO-DCA (for MUs; 2330 vs. 1991; P < 0.001, and for GI; 4.72 vs. 3.39; P < 0.001). WO-DCA was found significantly lower V4Gy (171.11 vs. 232.80 cm3, P < 0.001), V10Gy (25.82 vs. 29.71 cm3, P < 0.05), and V12Gy (14.35 vs. 17.28 cm3, P < 0.05) volumes than VMAT. WO-DCA was associated with markedly increase QA pass rates for all plans (97.65% vs. 92.64%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

WO-DCA may be the first choice compared to the VMAT in reducing the dose in the brain and minimizing small-field dosimetric errors for very small SRS treatment of brain metastases in the range of ≤ 1 cc and 2≤, ≥4.

Planning issues on linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy

This work aims to summarize and evaluate the current planning progress based on the linear accelerator in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). The specific techniques include 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, dynamic conformal arc therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). They are all designed to deliver higher doses to the target volume while reducing damage to normal tissues; among them, VMAT shows better prospects for application. This paper reviews and summarizes several issues on the planning of SRT to provide a reference for clinical application.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Single Isocenter Multiple Target SRS Plans and the Analytical Relationship between Plan Quality Indices with the Number and Volume of Targets

OBJECTIVE

To study the relationship of plan quality indices with the number and volume of target for 5 to 10 brain metastases treated with LINAC-based Single Isocenter Multiple Target (SIMT) Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning and to determine the maximum volume of spherical targets treated without exceeding the normal tissue tolerances.

METHODS

Spherical targets of 5 to 10 numbers per plan, with individual target volumes ranging from 0.025 cc to 11.5 cc, were simulated with randomly drawn planning target volumes (PTVs) within the brain. SIMT SRS plans were generated for the 21 Gy prescription dose with a 6 MV Flattening Filter Free photon beam. Target coverage, organ at risk sparing, plan quality indices, R50%, and gradient measure were studied. Mean brain dose, V12 for Brain minus PTV (BmP), V10, V12, V15, V18, V20, and V24 for brain volume were evaluated. Equations relating the gradient index, mean brain dose, and V12 (BmP) to the given number and volume of the targets were constructed.

RESULTS

PTV coverage D98 was 98.77 ± 1.37 %. The mean CIRTOG, QRTOG, HIRTOG, CIP, GI, and R50% of the individual targets were 1.02 ± 0.08, 0.94 ± 0.02, 1.49 ± 0.11, 0.91 ± 0.06, 4.74 ± 2.3, and 4.95 ± 2.67, respectively. The gradient measure achieved was in the range of 0.49 to 1.35 cm. The mean brain dose was in the range of 1.62 to 6.69 Gy. The mean V12 (BmP) per target obtained was 3.85 ± 2.83 cc.

CONCLUSION

Equations relating the number and volume of targets to the gradient measure, mean brain dose, V12 (BmP), and V10-24 can serve as a baseline for multiple brain metastases SIMT planning. The target volume for 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 targets that can be treated without exceeding V12 (BmP) is 6, 5, 4.7, 4, 3.7, and 3.4 cc, respectively, for the 21 Gy prescription dose.

In vitro quality assurance of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy mono-isocentric plan for simultaneous treatment of two targets

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to check the in vitro efficacy of a radiotherapy plan generated for the treatment of two femoral targets simultaneously in the pelvis.

METHODS

The target positions for conformal radiotherapy were simulated by joining two identical water phantoms (approximating the patient dimensions), and a treatment plan to treat the two targets simultaneously with a common isocenter was planned. Calculations were made with a dose prescription of 300cGy to each lesion. The plan was executed on a medical linear accelerator and verified for point doses for individual targets with two ion chambers. Two-dimensional dose verification for fluence was also performed using an array detector of ion chambers (I'mRTMatriXX) to further validate the technique.

RESULTS

The minimum, mean and maximum dose in centiGray(cGy) covered by both Ionization Chamber-1 (IC-1) and Ionization Chamber-2 (IC-2) was 295, 303 and 307 as per dose statistics from the treatment plan. The global dose max obtained from the plan was 307 cGy. Measured point doses to both the targets were within ±2%. Dose Difference and Distance to agreement (3%, 3 mm criteria) criteria also passed for 2Dfluence verification.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy of two or multiple targets using monoisocentric technique can appreciably reduce the scatter dose to the normal surrounding tissue around the target/s and also the required setup and treatment time is reduced significantly. Therefore, the technique can be efficiently used to save time without compromising the radio therapeutic ratio and quality treatment, for both palliative and curative intent.

Whole Brain Irradiation or Stereotactic RadioSurgery for five or more brain metastases (WHOBI-STER): A prospective comparative study of neurocognitive outcomes, level of autonomy in daily activities and quality of life

•

The main aim of MBM treatment is to palliate neurological symptoms and to maintain an adequate QoL.

•

SRT could be the “new standard” over WBI in the management of MBM patients.

•

Neurocognitive functions could deteriorate more after WBI than after SRT.

Aims

To evaluate neurocognitive performance, daily activity and quality of life (QoL), other than usual oncologic outcomes, among patients with brain metastasis ≥5 (MBM) from solid tumors treated with Stereotactic Brain Irradiation (SBI) or Whole Brain Irradiation (WBI).

Methods

This multicentric randomized controlled trial will involve the enrollment of 100 patients (50 for each arm) with MBM ≥ 5, age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70, life expectancy > 3 months, known primary tumor, with controlled or controllable extracranial disease, baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 20/30, Barthel Activities of Daily Living score ≥ 90/100, to be submitted to SBI by LINAC with monoisocentric technique and non-coplanar arcs (experimental arm) or to WBI (control arm). The primary endpoints are neurocognitive performance, QoL and autonomy in daily-life activities variations, the first one assessed by MoCa Score and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, the second one through the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-BN-20 questionnaires, the third one through the Barthel Index, respectively. The secondary endpoints are time to intracranial failure, overall survival, retreatment rate, acute and late toxicities, changing of KPS. It will be considered significant a statistical difference of at least 30% between the two arms (statistical power of 80% with a significance level of 95%).

Discussion

Several studies debate what is the decisive factor accountable for the development of neurocognitive decay among patients undergoing brain irradiation for MBM: radiation effect on clinically healthy brain tissue or intracranial tumor burden? The answer to this question may come from the recent technological advancement that allows, in a context of a significant time saving, improved patient comfort and minimizing radiation dose to off-target brain, a selective treatment of MBM simultaneously, otherwise attackable only by WBI. The achievement of a local control rate comparable to that obtained with WBI remains the fundamental prerequisite.

Trial registration

NCT number: NCT04891471.

Treatment of multiple intracranial metastases in radiation oncology: a contemporary review of available technologies

The use of stereotactic radiosurgery to treat multiple intracranial metastases, frequently concurrently, has become increasingly common. The ability to accurately and safely deliver stereotactic radiosurgery treatment to multiple intracranial metastases (MIM) relies heavily on the technology available for targeting, planning, and delivering the dose. A number of platforms are currently marketed for such applications, each with intrinsic capabilities and limitations. These can be broadly categorised as cobalt-based, linac-based, and robotic. This review describes the most common representative technologies for each type along with their advantages and current limitations as they pertain to the treatment of multiple intracranial metastases. Each technology was used to plan five clinical cases selected to represent the clinical breadth of multiple metastases cases. The reviewers discuss the different strengths and limitations attributed to each technology in the case of MIM as well as the impact of disease-specific characteristics (such as total number of intracranial metastases, their size and relative proximity) on plan and treatment quality.