1
|
Iori F, Cappelli A, D'Angelo E, Cozzi S, Ghersi SF, De Felice F, Ciammella P, Bruni A, Iotti C. Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100569. [PMID: 36590825 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objective of this work is to evaluate LRT safety and efficacy. Method Reports about LRT clinical experience were identified with a systematic review conducted on four different databases (namely, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) through the August 2022. Only LRT clinical reports published in English and with the access to the full manuscript text were considered as eligible. The 2020 update version PRISMA statement was followed. Results Data extraction was performed from 12 eligible records encompassing 7 case reports, 1 case series, and 4 clinical studies. 81 patients (84 lesions) with a large lesion ranging from 63.2 cc to 3713.5 cc were subjected to exclusive, hybrid, and metabolism guided LRT. Excluding two very severe toxicity with a questionable relation with LRT, available clinical experience seem to confirm LRT safety. When a complete response was not achieved 3-6 months after LRT, a median lesion reduction approximately ≥50 % was registered. Conclusion This systematic review appear to suggest LRT safety, especially for exclusive LRT. The very low level of evidence and the studies heterogeneity preclude drawing definitive conclusions on LRT efficacy, even though an interesting trend in terms of lesions reduction has been described.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferini G, Viola A, Valenti V, Tripoli A, Molino L, Marchese VA, Illari SI, Rita Borzì G, Prestifilippo A, Umana GE, Martorana E, Mortellaro G, Ferrera G, Cacciola A, Lillo S, Pontoriero A, Pergolizzi S, Parisi S. Whole Brain Irradiation or Stereotactic RadioSurgery for five or more brain metastases (WHOBI-STER): A prospective comparative study of neurocognitive outcomes, level of autonomy in daily activities and quality of life. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 32:52-58. [PMID: 34926839 PMCID: PMC8649107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The main aim of MBM treatment is to palliate neurological symptoms and to maintain an adequate QoL. SRT could be the “new standard” over WBI in the management of MBM patients. Neurocognitive functions could deteriorate more after WBI than after SRT.
Aims To evaluate neurocognitive performance, daily activity and quality of life (QoL), other than usual oncologic outcomes, among patients with brain metastasis ≥5 (MBM) from solid tumors treated with Stereotactic Brain Irradiation (SBI) or Whole Brain Irradiation (WBI). Methods This multicentric randomized controlled trial will involve the enrollment of 100 patients (50 for each arm) with MBM ≥ 5, age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70, life expectancy > 3 months, known primary tumor, with controlled or controllable extracranial disease, baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 20/30, Barthel Activities of Daily Living score ≥ 90/100, to be submitted to SBI by LINAC with monoisocentric technique and non-coplanar arcs (experimental arm) or to WBI (control arm). The primary endpoints are neurocognitive performance, QoL and autonomy in daily-life activities variations, the first one assessed by MoCa Score and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, the second one through the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-BN-20 questionnaires, the third one through the Barthel Index, respectively. The secondary endpoints are time to intracranial failure, overall survival, retreatment rate, acute and late toxicities, changing of KPS. It will be considered significant a statistical difference of at least 30% between the two arms (statistical power of 80% with a significance level of 95%). Discussion Several studies debate what is the decisive factor accountable for the development of neurocognitive decay among patients undergoing brain irradiation for MBM: radiation effect on clinically healthy brain tissue or intracranial tumor burden? The answer to this question may come from the recent technological advancement that allows, in a context of a significant time saving, improved patient comfort and minimizing radiation dose to off-target brain, a selective treatment of MBM simultaneously, otherwise attackable only by WBI. The achievement of a local control rate comparable to that obtained with WBI remains the fundamental prerequisite. Trial registration NCT number: NCT04891471.
Collapse
Key Words
- 3D-CRT, 3Dimensional-ConformalRadioTherapy
- Autonomy in daily activities
- BSC, Best Supportive Care
- Brain metastases
- CRF, Case Report Form
- CT, Computerized Tomography
- CTV, Clinical Target Volume
- EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 for Palliative Care
- FSRT, Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy
- GTV, Gross Tumor Volume
- KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status
- LINAC, Linear Accelerator
- MBM, Multiple Brain Metastastes
- MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment
- NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Neurocognitive decay
- Neurocognitive performance
- Neurocognitive tests
- OAR, Organ At Risk
- OS, Overall Survival
- PTV, Planning Target Volume
- Palliative care
- QLQ-BN20, Quality of Life Questionnaire - Brain Neoplasm 20
- QoL, Quality of Life
- Quality of life
- RT, Radiation Therapy
- RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases
- SBI, Stereotactic Brain Irradiation
- SRS, Stereotactic RadioSurgery
- SRT, Stereotactic Radiation Therapy
- Stereotactic Brain RadioSurgery
- Stereotactic Brain Radiotherapy
- Supportive care in cancer patients
- VEGF, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
- Whole Brain Radiotherapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Viola
- Fondazione IOM, Viagrande, I-95029 Catania, Italy
| | - Vito Valenti
- REM Radioterapia srl, Viagrande, I-95029 Catania, Italy
| | | | - Laura Molino
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Angela Prestifilippo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Mediterranean Institute of Oncology, Viagrande, I-95029 Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana
- Trauma Center, Gamma Knife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, I-95125 Catania, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Mortellaro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Ospedale Civico, I-90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Ospedale Civico, I-90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alberto Cacciola
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Sara Lillo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Pontoriero
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Silvana Parisi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|