Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy for elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Surgery Versus Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients over 75 Years Treated for Stage IA-IIA NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Lobectomy with lymph node dissection is the gold standard treatment for stage IA-IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Surgery is responsible for higher early mortality but offers better overall long-term survival. The patient population concerned is often elderly and combines the comorbidities of smoking and age. Several trials have shown good results of stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) in terms of local control and tolerance in elderly subjects. Our objective is to study the survival and regional control of patients over 75 years treated by surgery or SABR for localized NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We conducted a single-center retrospective study between January 2012 and December 2022 including elderly patients who received surgery or SABR for NSCLC less than 5 cm in size, N0, M0. A cumulative comorbidity index was calculated for each patient, considering severity and impact of treatment. We performed subgroup analyses using CART method to identify factors impacting survival and early death.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 127 operated patients were matched to 85 patients treated with SABR. Overall survival at 1 and 5 years for the operated patients was 83.87% and 47.30% compared with 88.8% and 31.5% in the radiotherapy group (p = 0.068). We have identified four factors influencing the incidence of early mortality: gender, World Health Organization Performance status (WHO status), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1), and treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery seems to remain the standard of treatment in terms of overall survival and locoregional recurrence, in a context where SABR nevertheless provides excellent local control and tolerance in the short and long term. In order to improve patient selection, we are proposing for the first time a tool to aid therapeutic decision-making.

Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Cancer Treatment for Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Background: Aging is a multifaceted process that may lead to an increased risk of developing cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in clinical cancer research may optimize cancer treatments, improve patient care, and minimize risks, prompting AI to receive high levels of attention in clinical medicine. This systematic review aims to synthesize current articles about the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in cancer treatments for older adults. Methods: We conducted a systematic review by searching CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE via EBSCO. We also conducted forward and backward hand searching for a comprehensive search. Eligible studies included a study population of older adults (60 and older) with cancer, used AI technology to treat cancer, and were published in a peer-reviewed journal in English. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024529270). Results: This systematic review identified seven articles focusing on lung, breast, and gastrointestinal cancers. They were predominantly conducted in the USA (42.9%), with others from India, China, and Germany. The measures of overall and progression-free survival, local control, and treatment plan concordance suggested that AI interventions were equally or less effective than standard care in treating older adult cancer patients. Conclusions: Despite promising initial findings, the utility of AI technologies in cancer treatment for older adults remains in its early stages, as further developments are necessary to enhance accuracy, consistency, and reliability for broader clinical use.

Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiotherapy on elderly patients with stage I-II central non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Many studies demonstrated the safety and efficacy of SBRT in the treatment of elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, those studies focused on patients with peripheral lung cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of SBRT in elderly patients with stage I-II central NSCLC in single institution.

Methods

From April 2009 to January 2020, a retrospective study was conducted on patients ≥ 65 years old with stage I-II NSCLC that was centrally localized and treated with SBRT at a single institution. Absolute C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio (CAR) and body mass index (BMI) recorded at pretreatment were analyzed. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific death, noncancer-specific death, local progression (LP) and distant progression (DP).

Results

Stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT) was administered to a total of 44 patients. The most common dose fractionation schedule was 60 Gy given in 5 fractions. The median PFS of the cohort was 31 months (95% CI, 19.47-42.53 months). The median OS of all patients was 69 months (95% CI, 33.8-104.2 months). The median time to noncancer-specific death was 54.5 months. The median time to cancer-specific death was 36 months. The cumulative incidences of cancer-specific death at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years were 11.63% (95%CI, 4.2-23.23%), 42.99% (95%CI, 27.56-57.53%), and 65.94% (95%CI, 45.76-80.1%), respectively. pre-SBRT BMI of ≤ 22.77 (HR 4.60, 95% CI 1.84-11.51, P=0.001) and pre-SBRT CAR of ≤0.91 (HR 5.19, 95% CI 2.15-12.52, P<0.000) were significant predictors of higher OS on multivariable analysis. The median times to LP and DP were 10 months and 11 months, respectively. In terms of acute toxicity, grade 1 including cough (38.64%), radiation pneumonitis (29.55%), anemia (25%), and fatigue (20.45%) was often observed. There was no evidence of grade 4 or 5 acute toxicity. In terms of late toxicity, 2 patients developed grade 1 pulmonary fibrosis during follow-up.

Conclusion

This study showed that SBRT can effectively control local tumor progression, and have acceptable toxicity for elderly patients with centrally located stage I-II NSCLC. Lower pre-SBRT BMI and lower pre-SBRT CAR were associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific death.

Survival analysis after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC), but which patients benefit from stereotactic radiotherapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for early mortality.

METHODS

From August 2010 to 2022, 617 patients with medically inoperable, peripheral or central ES-NSCLC were treated with SABR at our institution. We retrospectively evaluated the data from 172 consecutive patients treated from 2018 to 2020 to analyze the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). The biological effective dose was > 100 Gy10 in all patients, and 60 Gy was applied in 3-5 fractions for a gross tumor volume (GTV) + 3 mm margin when the tumor diameter was < 1 cm; 30-33 Gy was delivered in one fraction. Real-time tumor tracking or an internal target volume approach was applied in 96% and 4% of cases, respectively. In uni- and multivariate analysis, a Cox model was used for the following variables: ventilation parameter FEV1, histology, age, T stage, central vs. peripheral site, gender, pretreatment PET, biologically effective dose (BED), and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI).

RESULTS

The median OS was 35.3 months. In univariate analysis, no correlation was found between OS and ventilation parameters, histology, PET, or centrality. Tumor diameter, biological effective dose, gender, and AACCI met the criteria for inclusion in the multivariate analysis. The multivariate model showed that males (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.28; p = 0.05) and AACCI > 5 (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.31; p = 0.026) were significant negative prognostic factors of OS. However, the analysis of OS showed that the significant effect of AACCI > 5 was achieved only after 3 years (3-year OS 37% vs. 56%, p = 0.021), whereas the OS in one year was similar (1-year OS 83% vs. 86%, p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

SABR of ES-NSCLC with precise image guidance is feasible for all medically inoperable patients with reasonable performance status. Early deaths were rare in our real-life cohort, and OS is clearly higher than would have been expected after best supportive care.

Radiotherapy in nonagenarian patients: A 20-year retrospective analysis in a single ternary centre

INTRODUCTION

The global burden of cancer and the ageing population is increasing, resulting in an increase in cancer incidence among elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety profile of radiotherapy in nonagenarians and to contribute to the existing knowledge on radiotherapy in elderly patients.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included nonagenarian patients who received external beam radiotherapy at a single centre in Japan between May 2003 and May 2023. Data, including patient demographics, tumour characteristics, treatment details, and clinical outcomes, were collected from medical records. Statistical analyses including survival and subgroup analyses were performed to summarize the data.

RESULTS

The analysis included 124 nonagenarian patients who received 151 treatment courses. Among the patients with a median age of 92 years (range, 90-98 years), 71 received palliative-intent radiotherapy and 53 underwent curative-intent radiotherapy. The overall survival rates at 1 and 3 years after radiotherapy were 55.4% and 38.3%, respectively. Performance status and radiotherapy at the primary site were independent prognosis factors for improved overall survival, while age was not. The incidence rate of grades 3-5 radiation-related toxicities was 3.4%, which is generally considered to be acceptable.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that radiotherapy can be effectively and safely used in this age group, supporting its use as a treatment option for both palliative and curative goals. These results contribute to the existing body of evidence on radiotherapy in elderly patients and can guide clinical decision-making in the management of nonagenarian patients with cancer.

Treatment and mortality risk of older adults with non-small cell cancer in Taiwan: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Older patients tend to have decreased physical functions and more comorbidities than younger patients. At present, the best management for very elderly patients with lung cancer is not known. In this study, we aimed to investigate treatment and mortality risk of older adults with non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) in Taiwan.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. Patients aged ≥80 years with newly diagnosed NSCLC between 2010 and 2017 were included. Treatment options were categorized as curative, palliative, and no treatment. Patients were followed up until death or December 31, 2020. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate mortality risk, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn.

RESULTS

A total of 11 941 patients, aged ≥80 years, with newly diagnosed NSCLC between 2010 and 2017 were identified from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and followed up until 2020. The mean age was 84.4 ± 3.7 years old, and 7468 (62.54%) were men. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significant differences across the three treatment options (log-rank p < 0.001). Results from multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that patients on palliative treatment (adjusted HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.48-0.56, p < 0.001) and curative treatment (adjusted HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.42-0.48, p < 0.001) had a significantly lower mortality risk than those with no treatment. The subgroup analyses stratified by cancer stages also showed consistent findings.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with NSCLC had significantly decreased mortality risk when receiving curative or palliative treatment compared with those without treatment. In the future, further studies are warranted to investigate complications and quality of life of elderly patients with NSCLC during palliative or curative treatment.

Comparative Analysis of Photon Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Elderly Patients with Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

The emergence of an aging society and technological advances have made radiotherapy, especially stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a common alternative to surgery for elderly patients with early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is also an attractive treatment option with potentially lower toxicity for elderly patients with comorbidities. We compared the clinical outcomes of the two modalities using Japanese multicenter data. SBRT (n = 420) and single-fraction CIRT (n = 70) data for patients with stage I NSCLC from 20 centers were retrospectively analyzed. Contiguous patients ≥ 80 years of age were enrolled, and overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local control (LC), and adverse event rates were compared. The median age was 83 years in both groups and the median follow-up periods were 28.5 and 42.7 months for SBRT and CIRT, respectively. The 3-year OS, DSS, and LC rates were 76.0% vs. 72.3% (p = 0.21), 87.5% vs. 81.6% (p = 0.46), and 79.2% vs. 78.2% (p = 0.87), respectively, for the SBRT vs. CIRT groups. Regarding toxicity, 2.9% of the SBRT group developed grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis, whereas none of the CIRT group developed grade ≥ 2 radiation pneumonitis. SBRT and CIRT in elderly patients showed similar survival and LC rates, although CIRT was associated with less severe radiation pneumonitis.

Lung stereotactic radiation therapy: Intercomparison of irradiation devices in terms of outcome and predictive factors

PURPOSE

To compare three different radiotherapy devices able to perform pulmonary stereotactic radiotherapy: CyberKnife® (CK), Helical Tomotherapy® (HT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This study aims to define the patients' outcome in terms of SBRT efficacy and toxicities depending of the device choice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, radiological, and dosimetric data of patients treated with lung SBRT between 2016 and 2020 at Lausanne University Hospital, using the Chi² test for proportions, the t-test for means comparisons, the Kaplan-Meier method for survival, and the Log-rank test and Cox-regression for intergroups comparisons.

RESULTS

We identified 111 patients treated by either CK (59.9%), VMAT (38.0%), or HT (2.1%). Compared to other techniques, CK treated comparable gross tumor volume (GTV; 2.1 vs. 1.4cm³, P=0.84) with smaller planning treatment volume (PTV; 12.3 vs. 21.9cm³, P=0.013) and lower V5 (13.5 vs. 19.9cm³, P=0.002). Local control rates at 2years were not different whatever the irradiation device, respectively of 96.2% (range, 90.8-100) and 98.1% (range, 94.4-100), P=0.68. Toxicity incidence significantly increased with V5 value>17.2% (56.0 vs. 77.4%, P=0.021).

CONCLUSION

Compared to other SBRT techniques, CK treatments permitted to treat comparable GTV with reduced PTV and V5. Toxicity incidence was less frequent when reducing the V5. CK is particularly attractive in case of multiple courses of lung SBRT or lung reirradiation.

Dose-effect relationship of stereotactic body radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To establish the dose effect relationship between the dose parameters of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the local tumor control rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Web of Science and the Cochrane databases to determine the articles treated with SBRT in early-stage NSCLC. Original studies with complete prescription dose information, tumor local control rate and other important parameters were screened and reported. Probit model in XLSTAT 2016 was used for regression analysis, and P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level.

RESULTS

After literature screening, 22 eligible studies were included in probit model regression analysis, involving 1861 patients. There is no significant dose effect relationship between nominal BED₁₀ and peripheral BED₁₀ versus 3 years local control probability. There were significant dose effect relationships between the center BED₁₀ and the average BED₁₀ versus the 3 years local control probability, with P values are 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively. According to the results of this model, the 3 years local control rate of 90.5% (87.5-92.1%) and 89.5% (86.7-91.0%) can be expected at the center BED₁₀ of 180 Gy or the average BED₁₀ of 140 Gy, prospectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLC treated with SBRT, more attention should be paid to the central dose and average dose of PTV. A set of clear definition in the dose prescription should be established to ensure the effectiveness and comparability of treatment.

Surgery versus radiotherapy in octogenarians with stage Ia non‑small cell lung cancer: propensity score matching analysis of the SEER database

Objectives

To compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) outcomes of surgery with radiotherapy in octogenarians with stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods

Patients aged ≥ 80 years with clinical stage Ia (T1N0M0) NSCLC between 2012 and 2017 were identified from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were assigned into surgery and radiotherapy groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify survival-associated factors. Treatment groups were adjusted by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis while OS and CSS outcomes were compared among groups by Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

A total of 1641 patients were identified, with 46.0% in the surgical group and 54.0% in the radiotherapy group. Compared to surgery, radiotherapy-treated patients were older, later diagnosed, had more often unmarried, more squamous cell carcinoma, more unknown grade and increased tumor sizes. Radiotherapy was associated with a significantly worse OS, compared to surgery (hazard ratio 2.426; 95% CI 2.003–2.939; P < .001). After PSM, OS (P < 0.001) and CSS (P < 0.001) were higher in the surgery group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of surgical and radiotherapy group were 90.0%, 76.9%, 59.9%, and 86.0%, 54.3%, 28.0%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS rates of surgical and radiotherapy group were 94.5%, 86.1%, 78.0% and 90.7%, 74.5%, 61.0%, respectively. There were no survival differences between the matched surgery without lymph node examination (LNE) and radiotherapy group, as well as between the matched surgery and radiotherapy who were recommended but refused surgery group.

Conclusions

In octogenarians with stage Ia NSCLC, surgery with lymph node dissection offers better OS and CSS outcomes than radiotherapy.

Prognosis of stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients aged ≥ 80 years who were considered medically operable but received best supportive care alone

INTRODUCTION

Some elderly stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients may refuse both stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgery and may instead desire best supportive care (BSC) alone, despite having a medically operable condition.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the differences in the 3-year overall survival (3-year OS) rates among elderly stage I NSCLC patients aged ≥ 80 years who received surgery (OP group, n = 39), SBRT (RT group, n = 32) or BSC alone (BSC group, n = 28), stratifying the later groups according to those who were medically inoperable (MI subgroup) and those who were considered medically operable but refused surgery (MO subgroup).

RESULTS

During a median 39.1-month follow-up period, 44 patients died. The 3-year OS rates were longer and higher in the MI-RT subgroup and the OP group than in the MI-BSC subgroup (67%, 89%, and 22%, respectively; p = 0.001). No differences in the 3-year OS rates were seen among the MO-RT subgroup, the MO-BSC subgroup, and the OP group (75%, 70%, and 89%, respectively; p = 0.164). However, a multivariate analysis identified a performance status (PS) score of 1-2 or a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score of ≥2, as well as stage IB disease and BSC, as independently increasing the risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly stage I NSCLC patients who were medically operable but who refused surgery and desire BSC alone should be encouraged to undergo SBRT unless they have a good PS and are otherwise in healthy condition.

First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Combined With Local Consolidative Radiation Therapy for Elderly Patients With Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Activating Mutations

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined applications of local consolidative radiation therapy (LCRT) and first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of primary tumors and oligometastatic sites in oligometastatic NSCLC harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) activating mutations.

Patients and Methods

Elderly patients with oligometastatic NSCLC (≤5 metastases) harboring EGFR activating mutations at the time of diagnosis were identified. They were treated with first-line TKIs alone or in combination with LCRT. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated through the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

A total of 122 elderly patients were enrolled between February 2010 and January 2018. Among them, 41.0% (n = 50) received TKIs combined with LCRT (TKIs + LCRT group), whereas 59.0% (n = 72) received TKIs monotherapy (TKIs alone group). Patients were followed up for a median length of 34 months (ranging from 7.0 to 64 months). The median PFS in TKIs + LCRT group was 17 months (95%CI: 15.37–18.63), which was significantly longer than that of the TKIs-alone group (12 months; 95%CI: 11.05–12.95) (p &lt;0.001). Median OS in TKIs + LCRT group was 38 months (95%CI: 35.61–40.39), while that of the TKIs-alone group was 29 months (95%CI: 26.86–31.14) (p &lt;0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that LCRT, one to two metastases, and good ECOG PS were independent predictors for better PFS (p &lt;0.001, p = 0.004, and p = 0.027). Moreover, LCRT, good ECOG PS, and T1-2 stage were independent predictors for better OS (p &lt;0.001, p = 0.007 and p = 0.007). Most of the patients suffered from grade 1 to 2 toxicities, and treatment-related deaths were not recorded.

Conclusion

First-line TKIs combined with LCRT may improve survival outcomes for elderly patients with oligometastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR activating mutations. This approach was not associated with much toxicity, therefore, it can be used for the treatment of elderly patients with oligometastatic disease.