Transpedicular bone grafting and pedicle screw fixation in injured vertebrae using a paraspinal approach for thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study

Effective method of pedicle screw fixation in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of studies published over the last 20 years

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of studies on various posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) methods used for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures and to identify the most effective and safe approaches.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the study registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024531093). The inclusion criteria were: (1) publication dates from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023; (2) availability of full-text articles in English; (3) thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits; (4) patients aged over 18; (5) reports on treatment outcomes or complications; (6) a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 69 articles covering 116 patient groups were included. Our analysis highlighted the advantages of short-segment fixation without fusion over monosegmental, short-segment and long-segment fusion in terms of shorter operation times and reduced intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Extensive fusion was associated with a significantly higher frequency of deep surgical site infections compared to other PSF methods (p = 0.043). Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, applied to patients with lower body compression rates and kyphotic deformities, led to less potential for correction (p = 0.004), yet significantly decreased blood loss (p = 0.011), operation duration (p < 0.0001), and hospitalization duration (p < 0.0001). No significant benefits were observed with the use of additional intermediate screws in short-segment PSF.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-segment pedicle screw fixation could be the optimal surgical treatment method for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. The use of posterior lateral fusion in this context may increase the deep surgical site infection rate without reducing the frequency of implant-related complications or improving long-term treatment outcomes. The percutaneous approach remains the preferred technique; however, its limited reduction capabilities should be carefully considered during surgical planning for patients with severe kyphotic deformities. The application of intermediate screws in such patients has not demonstrated significant advantages. Removing the fixation system has not led to a significant decrease in implant-related complications or improvement in quality of life. The data obtained from the systematic review may assist surgeons in selecting the most appropriate surgical treatment method for patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, thereby avoiding ineffective procedures and improving both short-term and long-term outcomes.

Finite element analysis of precise puncture vertebral augmentation in the treatment of different types of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) secondary to osteoporosis is a common health problem in the elderly population. Vertebral augmentation (VA) has been widely used as a minimally invasive surgical method. The transpedicle approach is commonly used for VA puncture, but sometimes, it is limited by the anatomy of the vertebral body and can not achieve good surgical results. Therefore, we propose the treatment of OVCF with precise puncture vertebral augmentation (PPVA). This study used finite element analysis to explore the biomechanical properties of PPVA in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with wedge, biconcave, and collapse deformities.

METHOD

Three-dimensional finite element models of the fractured vertebral body and adjacent superior and inferior vertebral bodies were established using Computed Tomography (CT) data from patients with OVCF, both before and after surgery. Evaluate the stress changes of the wedged deformed vertebral body, biconcave deformed vertebral body, collapsed deformed vertebral body, and adjacent vertebral bodies before and after PPVA.

RESULT

In vertebral bodies with wedge deformity and collapsed deformity, PPVA can effectively reduce the stress on the vertebral body but increases the stress on the vertebral body with biconcave deformity. PPVA significantly decreases the stress on the adjacent vertebral bodies of the wedge deformed vertebral body, and decreases the stress on the adjacent superior vertebral body of biconcave deformity and collapsed deformed vertebral bodies, but increases the stress on the adjacent inferior vertebral bodies. PPVA improves the stress distribution of the vertebral body and prevents high-stress areas from being concentrated on one side of the vertebral body.

CONCLUSION

PPVA has shown positive surgical outcomes in treating wedge deformed and collapsed deformed vertebral bodies. However, its effectiveness in treating biconcave vertebral body is limited. Furthermore, PPVA has demonstrated favorable results in addressing adjacent superior vertebral body in three types of fractures.

Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: A systematic review

Introduction

The treatment of traumatic thoracic and lumbar spine fractures remains controversial. To date no consensus exists on the correct choice of surgical approach and technique.

Research question

to provide a comprehensive up-to-date overview of the available different surgical methods and their quantified outcomes.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched between 2001 and 2020 using the term 'spinal fractures'. Inclusion criteria were: adults, ≥10 cases, ≥12 months follow-up, thoracic or lumbar fractures, and surgery <3 weeks of trauma. Studies were categorized per surgical technique: Posterior open (PO), posterior percutaneous (PP), stand-alone vertebral body augmentation (SA), anterior scopic (AS), anterior open (AO), posterior percutaneous and anterior open (PPAO), posterior percutaneous and anterior scopic (PPAS), posterior open and anterior open (POAO) and posterior open and anterior scopic (POAS). The PO group was used as a reference group.

Results

After duplicate removal 6042 articles were identified. A total of 102 articles were Included, in which 137 separate surgical technique cohorts were described: PO (n = 75), PP, (n = 39), SA (n = 12), AO (n = 5), PPAO (n = 1), PPAS (n = 1), POAO (n = 2) and POAS (n = 2).

Discussion and conclusion

For type A3/A4 burst fractures, without severe neurological deficit, posterior percutaneous (PP) technique seems the safest and most feasible option in the past two decades. If needed, PP can be combined with anterior augmentation to prevent secondary kyphosis. Furthermore, posterior open (PO) technique is feasible in almost all types of fractures. Also, this technique can provide for an additional posterior decompression or fusion. Overall, no neurologic deterioration was reported following surgical intervention.

Iatrogenic Abdominal Aortic Rupture During Transpedicular Bone Grafting for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Successfully Treated by Endovascular Stent Implantation

PURPOSE

Vascular injury resulting from transpedicular bone grafting in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures has not been reported but can be lethal. The management of patients with iatrogenic aortic injury remains a difficult clinical problem. This study describes a case of iatrogenic abdominal aortic rupture at the level of L2 during transpedicular bone grafting for the first time.

CASE REPORT

A 55 year-old male patient suffered from a T12 vertebral body mild compression fracture and an L2 vertebral body burst fracture due to falling. This patient was treated with posterior open reduction and pedicle screw fixation combined with transpedicular bone grafting in the L2 vertebrae using a paravertebral approach. Unfortunately, during transpedicular bone grafting, the abdominal aorta was punctured by the tip of the graft funnel. The use of endovascular stent implantation successfully averted a clinical catastrophe. The patient had a good clinical outcome, and no complications associated with vascular trauma were apparent at a 1-year follow-up examination.

CONCLUSION

For the repair of vascular injury caused by transpedicular bone grafting, endovascular techniques can provide a safe, minimally invasive, and effective treatment option.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Surgeons should carefully evaluate the specificity of the patient's anatomical structures preoperatively and be more cautious during transpedicular bone grafting in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Novel uniplanar pedicle screw systems applied to thoracolumbar fractures: a biomechanical study

Objective: In this study, the advantages of the internal fixation configuration composed of uniplanar pedicle screws in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures were verified by biomechanical experimental methods, which provided the basis for subsequent clinical experiments and clinical applications. Methods: A total of 24 fresh cadaveric spine specimens (T12-L2) were utilized to conduct biomechanical experiments. Two different internal fixation configurations, namely, the 6-screw configuration and the 4-screw/2-NIS (new intermediate screws) configuration, were tested using fixed-axis pedicle screws (FAPS), uniplanar pedicle screws (UPPS), and polyaxial pedicle screws (PAPS) respectively. The spine specimens were uniformly loaded with 8NM pure force couples in the directions of anteflexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation, and right rotation, and the range of motion (ROM) of the T12-L1 and L1-L2 segments of the spine was measured and recorded to access biomechanical stability. Results: No structural damage such as ligament rupture or fracture occurred during all experimental tests. In the 6-screw configuration, the ROM of the specimens in the UPPS group was significantly better than that of the PAPS group but weaker than those of the FAPS group (p < 0.01). In the 4-screw/2-NIS configuration, the results were identical to the biomechanical test results for the 6-screw configuration (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Biomechanical test results show that the internal fixation configuration with UPPS can maintain the stability of the spine well, and the results are better than that of PAPS. UPPS has both the biomechanical advantages of FAPS and the superiority of easy operation of PAPS. We believe it is an optional internal fixation device for minimally invasive treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

Pedicle screw fixation combined with posterior decompression and bone grafting for thoracolumbar spinal fractures can enhance curative effect and spinal cord function

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of pedicle screw fixation (PSF) combined with posterior decompression and bone grafting for thoracolumbar spinal fractures (TLSFs) and its influence on spinal cord function.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 94 patients with TLSFs treated in the China-Japan Friendship Hospital rom June 2015 and September 2020 were selected, including 53 cases in the joint group treated with PSF combined with posterior decompression and bone grafting, and 41 cases in the control group with PSF alone. The two groups were compared in terms of operation time, intra-operational blood loss, length of hospital stay and wound healing as well as the pre- and post-treatment spinal cord function, and patients' clinical outcomes. Pre- and post-operatively, the pain severity was evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the spinal dysfunction was assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the injured vertebral height and Cobb angles of the thoracolumbar spine (TLS) were compared. The clinical efficacy and postoperative complication rates of the two groups were observed and compared.

RESULTS

Less operative time, intraoperative bleeding, hospitalization time and wound healing time were determined in the joint group compared with the control group (all P<0.05). The postoperative sensory function and motor function were also better in the joint group (all P<0.05). Postoperatively, the joint group showed lower VAS and ODI scores than in the control group, with lower upper and lower TLS Cobb angles, and higher height of the anterior and posterior margins of the fractured vertebra (all P<0.05). The total effective rate was higher, and the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the joint group compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION

PSF combined with posterior decompression and bone grafting is effective in the treatment of TLSFs, which can not only significantly improve the spinal cord function and alleviate spinal dysfunction, but also help to relieve pain and reduce postoperative complications.

Posterior pedicle screw fixation combined with transpedicular bone grafting for treatment of single-level thoracolumbar fractures with the aid of a vertebroplasty tool

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to assess the efficacy of a novel tool to assist transpedicular bone grafting in short-segment pedicle screw fixation combined with pedicle fixation at the level of the fractured vertebra (six-screw fixation).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients (40 in the control group and 40 in the tool-aided group) with single-level thoracolumbar fractures. Patients in the control group underwent traditional six-screw fixation combined with transpedicular bone grafting. In the tool-aided group, we introduced a novel vertebroplasty tool to assist transpedicular bone grafting. Basic information and related indicators were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the patients' baseline characteristics or surgical outcomes between the control group and tool-aided group. Both traditional surgery and tool-aided surgery restored the height of the fractured vertebrae and decreased the Cobb angle, visual analog scale score, and Oswestry Disability Index. However, tool-aided surgery more effectively restored the height of the fractured vertebrae and reduced the visual analog scale score and Oswestry Disability Index than did traditional surgery.

CONCLUSION

Vertebroplasty tool-aided surgery facilitated more precise and successful grafting of bone into damaged vertebrae than did traditional surgery and therefore might be recommended for treating single-level thoracolumbar fractures.

Clinical Outcomes of Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Treated by Trans-Kambin triangle versus Transpedicular Bone Grafting Combined with Posterior Internal Fixation

OBJECTIVE

The ideal management of thoracolumbar burst fracture (TLBF) remains controversial. We conducted this study to compare the effectiveness and safety of trans-Kambin triangle versus transpedicular bone grafting combined with posterior internal fixation (PIF) for TLBF.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 2 groups: the observation group (PIF combined with bone grafting via the Kambin triangle, n = 28) and the control group (PIF combined with bone grafting via transpedicular, n = 26). The anterior vertebral height ratio, sagittal Cobb angle, visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, bone healing rate, and neurologic complications were measured.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up regularly for a mean period of 17.94 months (12 - 24 months). The anterior vertebral height ratio in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (93.93 ± 2.92 vs. 89.90 ± 5.54%, P = 0.006), and the loss of correction was lower (1.59 ± 1.20 vs. 3.00 ± 1.98%, P = 0.008). The observation group had lower sagittal Cobb angle at final follow-up (8.68 ± 3.75 vs. 11.33 ± 4.77 degrees, P = 0.046) and less correction loss (1.96 ± 1.32 ± 1.15 vs. 3.90 ± 2.39 degrees, P = 0.002). The visual analog scale score and Oswestry Disability Index in the observation group were lower (0.61 ± 0.43 vs. 0.92 ± 0.38, P = 0.016; 15.86 ± 4.11 vs. 19.18 ± 4.04, P = 0.010), while the fracture healing rate showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). No internal fixation failure or neurologic complications occurred in both groups during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone grafting via the Kambin triangle combined with PIF is a safe and effective technology for thoracolumbar burst fracture.

Open reduction of thoraco-lumbar fractures and sagital balance correction using Schanz screws

INTRODUCTION

The correction of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures with a short instrumentation using Schanz screws, is an effective method for stabilization and sagittal balance restoration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bidirectional observational study, included patients undergoing arthrodesis with Schanz screws to manage thoracic and lumbar fractures, the general characteristics, type, and location of the fracture, besides the gain in height of the vertebral body and segmental angle were analyzed. before and after surgery. Clinical and imaging control was performed postoperatively and 1 month after this. p-value < .05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of 35 patients undergoing arthrodesis, 13 were excluded due to the absence of images and follow-up. There was a higher proportion of men, the main location of the fracture and AO spine classification was in T12 and type A4/B1 respectively, there was no intraoperative complication, no transfusion was required, and a short hospital stay. A mild complication was presented in the follow-up. The average pre and postoperative change was 12 degrees in the Cobb angle and 5.2 mm vertebral body height in the fractured vertebra, these changes were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fracture correction with short segment fixation using Schanz screws, is an effective, safe and fast, showing significantly vertebral height gain and segmental angle correction, as a consequence, a correction of the balance and alignment of the spine.

A Hybrid Uniplanar Pedicle Screw System with a New Intermediate Screw for Minimally Invasive Spinal Fixation: A Finite Element Analysis

Purpose

A hybrid pedicle screw system for minimally invasive spinal fixation was developed based on the uniplanar pedicle screw construct and a new intermediate screw. Its biomechanical performance was evaluated using finite element (FE) analysis.

Methods

A T12-L2 FE model was established to simulate the L1 vertebral compression fracture with Magerl classification A1.2. Six fixation models were developed to simulate the posterior pedicle screw fracture fixation, which were divided into two subgroups with different construct configurations: (1) six-monoaxial/uniplanar/polyaxial pedicle screw constructs and (2) four-monoaxial/uniplanar/polyaxial pedicle screw constructs with the new intermediate screw. After model validation, flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation with 7.5 Nm moments and preloading of 500 N vertical compression were applied to the FE models to compare the biomechanical performances of the six fixation models with maximum von Mises stress, range of motion, and maximum displacement of the vertebra.

Results

Under four loading scenarios, the maximum von Mises stresses were found to be at the roots of the upper or lower pedicle screws. In the cases of flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation, the maximum von Mises stress of the uniplanar screw construct lay in between the monoaxial and polyaxial screw constructs in each subgroup. Considering lateral bending, the uniplanar screw construct enabled to lower the maximum von Mises stress than monoaxial and polyaxial pedicle screw constructs in each subgroup. Two subgroups showed comparable results of the maximum von Mises stress on the endplates, range of motion of T12-L1, and maximum displacement of T12 between the corresponding constructs with the new intermediate screw or not.

Conclusions

The observations shown in this study verified that the hybrid uniplanar pedicle screw system exhibited comparable biomechanical performance as compared with other posterior short-segment constructs. The potential advantage of this new fixation system may provide researchers and clinical practitioners an alternative for minimally invasive spinal fixation with vertebral augmentation.