Treatment of acquired drug resistance in multiple myeloma by combination therapy with XPO1 and topoisomerase II inhibitors

XPO1/Exportin-1 in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia; Biology and Therapeutic Targeting

Exportin 1 is responsible for the export of hundreds of proteins, several RNA species and ribosomal components from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Several transported proteins are important for regulation of cell proliferation and survival both in normal and malignant cells. We review the biological importance and the possibility of therapeutic targeting of Exportin 1 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Exportin 1 levels can be increased in human primary AML cells, and even exportin inhibition as monotherapy seems to have an antileukemic effect. The results from Phase I/II studies also suggest that exportin inhibition can be combined with conventional chemotherapy, including intensive induction and consolidation therapy possibly followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation as well as AML-stabilizing therapy in elderly/unfit patients with hypomethylating agents. However, the risk of severe toxicity needs to be further evaluated; hematological toxicity is common together with constitutional side effects, electrolyte disturbances, and gastrointestinal toxicity. A recent randomized study of intensive chemotherapy with and without the Exportin inhibitor selinexor in elderly patients showed reduced survival in the selinexor arm; this was due to a high frequency of relapse and severe infections during neutropenia. Experimental studies suggest that Exportin 1 inhibition can be combined with other forms of targeted therapy. Thus, Exportin 1 inhibition should still be regarded as a promising strategy for AML treatment, but future studies should focus on the risk of toxicity when combined with conventional chemotherapy, especially in elderly/unfit patients, combinations with targeted therapies, identification of patient subsets (AML is a heterogeneous disease) with high susceptibility, and the possible use of less toxic next-generation Exportin 1 inhibitors.

Targeting deubiquitinase USP7-mediated stabilization of XPO1 contributes to the anti-myeloma effects of selinexor

BACKGROUND

Targeting exportin1 (XPO1) with Selinexor (SEL) is a promising therapeutic strategy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, intrinsic and acquired drug resistance constitute great challenges. SEL has been reported to promote the degradation of XPO1 protein in tumor cells. Nevertheless, in myeloma, the precise mechanisms underlying SEL-induced XPO1 degradation and its impact on drug responsiveness remain largely undefined.

METHODS

We assessed XPO1 protein and mRNA levels using western blotting and RT-qPCR. Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assays and degradation blockade assays were used to determine the pathway of XPO1 degradation induced by SEL. The sensitivity of MM cell lines to SEL was evaluated using CCK8-based cell viability assays and AV-PI staining-based cell apoptosis assays. The subcellular localization of the cargo protein RanBP1 was assessed via immunofluorescence staining. Immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry (IP-MS), bioinformatics analysis and ubiquitination assays, were employed to identify the molecular targets responsible for SEL-induced degradation of XPO1. shRNA-mediated knockdown assays and small molecule inhibitors of USP7 were utilized to disrupt the function of USP7. The role of USP7 in modulating SEL sensitivity was analyzed in MM cell lines, primary CD138+ cells, and xenograft mouse models.

RESULTS

SEL promotes the degradation of XPO1 in MM cells through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. There is a positive correlation between XPO1 degradation and sensitivity to SEL in these cells. Inhibiting XPO1 degradation reduces the functional inhibitory effects of SEL on XPO1, as evidenced by decreased nuclear localization of the cargo protein RanBP1. USP7 stabilizes XPO1 in MM cells via its deubiquitinating activity. SEL accelerates the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of XPO1 by disrupting the interaction between XPO1 and USP7. The expression of USP7 is negatively correlated with patient prognosis and the sensitivity of MM cells to SEL. Inactivating or knocking down USP7 significantly enhances the anti-myeloma effects of SEL both in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our findings underscore the essential role of XPO1 degradation in the anti-myeloma efficacy of SEL and establish a research foundation for targeting USP7 to improve the effectiveness of SEL-based therapies in MM.

The impact of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in extramedullary multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents: insights from a multicenter study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the impact of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) on the survival outcomes of multiple myeloma patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) in the era of novel agents, utilizing the largest dataset of extramedullary multiple myeloma patients in China.

METHODS

This study included a total of 371 patients with EMD, comprising 113 patients with de novo EME and 258 patients with EMB.

RESULTS

Patients with one HRA and those with ≥ 2 HRA demonstrated significantly worse overall survival (OS) (P < 0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.01) compared to patients without HRA. Additionally, 1q21 gain/amplification (1q21 +) remained a predictor of poor prognosis in EMD. CD38 monoclonal antibody-based therapy and single transplantation were less effective in improving survival outcomes for EMD with ≥ 2 HRA. Multivariable analysis identified LDH levels > 250 U/L, creatinine levels > 177 μmol/L, extramedullary extraosseous (EME), 1 HRA, and ≥ 2 HRA as independent adverse prognostic factors in patients with EMD.

CONCLUSION

Patients with EMD who had ≥ 2 HRA experienced an extremely poor prognosis, which could not be improved by single transplantation or CD38 monoclonal antibody-based treatment. The number of HRA could serve as an important factor in guiding treatment choices and predicting prognosis in patients with EMD. Furthermore, 1q21 + remained a significant factor associated with worse survival outcomes in EMD.

Selinexor combined with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of Selinexor combined bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (XVRd) protocol in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease.

METHODS

This is a single-arm, open, observational clinical study. For induction/consolidation(21-day cycles), patients received 8 cycles of XVRd protocol. In maintenance (28-day cycles), patients received XR (Selinexor + Lenalidomide) at least 2 years until disease progression, death or withdrawal. The primary endpoints were overall response rates and minimal residual disease negative rates.

RESULTS

The median age of the 10 patients was 62 (range 55-81) years. R-ISS stage 3 was present in 2 (20%) patients. 3 patients had high risk cytogenetic and 1 patient with plasma cell leukocyte. According to IMWG criteria, the ORR of 10 patients with NDMM was 100%, including 2 stringent complete response (sCR), 2 complete remission (CR), 4 very good partial response (VGPR) and 2 partial response (PR). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were not achieved. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (occurring in 10% of patients) were thrombocytopenia. The most common non-hematological adverse events were grade 1 or 2, including nausea (30%), fatigue (40%), and anorexia (20%). Overall, the severe toxicities were manageable.

CONCLUSION

The XVRd regimen had good efficacy and safety in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease.

Muscone restores anoikis sensitivity in TMZ-resistant glioblastoma cells by suppressing TOP2A via the EGFR/Integrin β1/FAK signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide (TMZ) resistance is the main obstacle faced by glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treatment. Muscone, one of the primary active pharmacological ingredients of Shexiang (Moschus), can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and is being investigated as an antineoplastic medication. However, muscone treatment for GBM has received little research, and its possible mechanisms are still unclear.

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the effect and the potential molecular mechanism of muscone on TMZ-resistant GBM cells.

METHODS

The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between TMZ-resistant GBM cells and TMZ-sensitive GBM cells were screened using GEO2R. By progressively raising the TMZ concentration, a relatively stable TMZ-resistant human GBM cell line was established. The drug-resistance traits of U251-TR cells were assessed via the CCK-8 assay and Western Blot analysis of MGMT and TOP2A expression. Cell viability, cell proliferation, cell migration ability, and drug synergism were detected by the CCK-8 assay, colony formation assay, wound healing assay, and drug interaction relationship test, respectively. Anoikis was quantified by Calcein-AM/EthD-1 staining, MTT assay, and flow cytometry. Measurements of cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were performed using cell cycle staining, Annexin V-FITC/PI labeling, JC-1 assay, and ROS assay, respectively. DNA damage was measured by TUNEL assay, alkaline comet assay, and γ-H2AX foci assay. GEPIA was used to investigate the link between the anoikis marker (FAK)/drug resistance gene and critical proteins in the EGFR/Integrin β1 signaling pathway. Molecular docking was used to anticipate the probable targets of muscone. The intracellular co-localization and expression of EGFR and FAK were shown using immunofluorescence. The U251-TR cell line stably overexpressing EGFR was constructed using lentiviral transduction to assess the involvement of EGFR-related signaling in anoikis resistance. Western Blot was employed to detect the expression of migration-related proteins, cyclins, anoikis-related proteins, DNA damage/repair-related proteins, and associated pathway proteins.

RESULTS

DEGs analysis identified 97 deregulated chemotherapy-resistant genes and 3779 upregulated genes in TMZ-resistant GBM cells. Subsequent experiments verified TMZ resistance and the hyper-expression of DNA repair-related genes (TOP2A and MGMT) in continuously low-dose TMZ-induced U251-TR cells. Muscone exhibited dose-dependent inhibition of U251-TR cell migration and proliferation, and its co-administration with TMZ showed the potential for enhanced therapeutic efficacy. By downregulating FAK, muscone reduced anoikis resistance in anchorage-independent U251-TR cells. It also caused cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase by upregulating p21 and downregulating CDK1, CDK2, and Cyclin E1. Muscone-induced anoikis was accompanied by mitochondrial membrane potential collapse, ROS production, an increase in the BAX/Bcl-2 ratio, as well as elevated levels of Cytochrome c (Cyt c), cleaved caspase-9, and cleaved caspase-3. These findings indicated that muscone might trigger mitochondrial-dependent anoikis via ROS generation. Moreover, significant DNA damage, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the formation of γ-H2AX foci, and a reduction in TOP2A expression are also associated with muscone-induced anoikis. Overexpression of EGFR in U251-TR cells boosted the expression of Integrin β1, FAK, β-Catenin, and TOP2A, whereas muscone suppressed the expression levels of EGFR, Integrin β1, β-Catenin, FAK, and TOP2A. Muscone may influence the expression of the key DNA repair enzyme, TOP2A, by suppressing the EGFR/Integrin β1/FAK pathway.

CONCLUSION

We first demonstrated that muscone suppressed TOP2A expression through the EGFR/Integrin β1/FAK pathway, hence restoring anoikis sensitivity in TMZ-resistant GBM cells. These data suggest that muscone may be a promising co-therapeutic agent for enhancing GBM treatment, particularly in cases of TMZ-resistant GBM with elevated TOP2A expression.

In vitro evolution and whole genome analysis to study chemotherapy drug resistance in haploid human cells

In vitro evolution and whole genome analysis has proven to be a powerful method for studying the mechanism of action of small molecules in many haploid microbes but has generally not been applied to human cell lines in part because their diploid state complicates the identification of variants that confer drug resistance. To determine if haploid human cells could be used in MOA studies, we evolved resistance to five different anticancer drugs (doxorubicin, gemcitabine, etoposide, topotecan, and paclitaxel) using a near-haploid cell line (HAP1) and then analyzed the genomes of the drug resistant clones, developing a bioinformatic pipeline that involved filtering for high frequency alleles predicted to change protein sequence, or alleles which appeared in the same gene for multiple independent selections with the same compound. Applying the filter to sequences from 28 drug resistant clones identified a set of 21 genes which was strongly enriched for known resistance genes or known drug targets (TOP1, TOP2A, DCK, WDR33, SLCO3A1). In addition, some lines carried structural variants that encompassed additional known resistance genes (ABCB1, WWOX and RRM1). Gene expression knockdown and knockout experiments of 10 validation targets showed a high degree of specificity and accuracy in our calls and demonstrates that the same drug resistance mechanisms found in diverse clinical samples can be evolved, discovered and studied in an isogenic background.

Treatment of multiple myeloma with selinexor: a review

Over the last 20 years, breakthroughs in accessible therapies for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have been made. Nevertheless, patients with MM resistant to immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies have a very poor outcome. Therefore, it is necessary to explore new drugs for the treatment of MM. This review summarizes the mechanism of action of selinexor, relevant primary clinical trials, and recent developments in both patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma and patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Selinexor may be useful for the treatment of refractory MM.

Therapeutic targeting of nuclear export and import receptors in cancer and their potential in combination chemotherapy

Systemic modalities are crucial in the management of disseminated malignancies and liquid tumours. However, patient responses and tolerability to treatment are generally poor and those that enter remission often return with refractory disease. Combination therapies provide a methodology to overcome chemoresistance mechanisms and address dose-limiting toxicities. A deeper understanding of tumorigenic processes at the molecular level has brought a targeted therapy approach to the forefront of cancer research, and novel cancer biomarkers are being identified at a rapid rate, with some showing potential therapeutic benefits. The Karyopherin superfamily of proteins is soluble receptors that mediate nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of proteins and RNAs, and recently, nuclear transport receptors have been recognized as novel anticancer targets. Inhibitors against nuclear export have been approved for clinical use against certain cancer types, whereas inhibitors against nuclear import are in preclinical stages of investigation. Mechanistically, targeting nucleocytoplasmic shuttling has shown to abrogate oncogenic signalling and restore tumour suppressor functions through nuclear sequestration of relevant proteins and mRNAs. Hence, nuclear transport inhibitors display broad spectrum anticancer activity and harbour potential to engage in synergistic interactions with a wide array of cytotoxic agents and other targeted agents. This review is focussed on the most researched nuclear transport receptors in the context of cancer, XPO1 and KPNB1, and highlights how inhibitors targeting these receptors can enhance the therapeutic efficacy of standard of care therapies and novel targeted agents in a combination therapy approach. Furthermore, an updated review on the therapeutic targeting of lesser characterized karyopherin proteins is provided and resistance to clinically approved nuclear export inhibitors is discussed.

CK1δ and CK1ε Signaling Sustains Mitochondrial Metabolism and Cell Survival in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma remains an incurable malignancy due to acquisition of intrinsic programs that drive therapy resistance. Here we report that casein kinase-1δ (CK1δ) and CK1ε are therapeutic targets in multiple myeloma that are necessary to sustain mitochondrial metabolism. Specifically, the dual CK1δ/CK1ε inhibitor SR-3029 had potent in vivo and ex vivo anti-multiple myeloma activity, including against primary multiple myeloma patient specimens. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and metabolic analyses revealed inhibiting CK1δ/CK1ε disables multiple myeloma metabolism by suppressing genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos), reducing citric acid cycle intermediates, and suppressing complexes I and IV of the electron transport chain. Finally, sensitivity of multiple myeloma patient specimens to SR-3029 correlated with elevated expression of mitochondrial genes, and RNA-seq from 687 multiple myeloma patient samples revealed that increased CSNK1D, CSNK1E, and OxPhos genes correlate with disease progression and inferior outcomes. Thus, increases in mitochondrial metabolism are a hallmark of multiple myeloma progression that can be disabled by targeting CK1δ/CK1ε.

SIGNIFICANCE

CK1δ and CK1ε are attractive therapeutic targets in multiple myeloma whose expression increases with disease progression and connote poor outcomes, and that are necessary to sustain expression of genes directing OxPhos.

Optimal timing and drug combination of selinexor in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease despite advances in treatment options. Recently, selinexor has shown promising efficacy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), whereas its optimal timing and drug combination remain unclear. In order to assess the various regimens that incorporate selinexor, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.

METHODS

Clinical trials and real-world studies involving MM patients treated with selinexor were included. Pooled risk ratio (RR) was calculated to compare the rates, along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and concurrent p-value assessment. A random-effects model was employed to provide a more conservative evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies enrolling 817 patients were reviewed. The usage of selinexor as the fifth-line or prior therapy achieved a higher objective response rate (ORR) (65.9% versus 23.4%, p < 0.01) and longer pooled progression-free survival (PFS) (median: 12.5 months versus 2.9 months, p < 0.01) than those after the fifth-line usage. In addition, early usage also resulted in a consistent trend of pooled overall survival (median: 22.7 months versus 8.9 months, p = 0.26), compared with post-fifth-line usage. Selinexor and dexamethasone (Xd) plus either protease inhibitors (PIs) or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) achieved better ORRs than the Xd-only regimen for RRMM, with ORRs of 56.1%, 52.5% and 24.6%, respectively (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, using selinexor as the fifth-line or prior therapy had a beneficial impact on RRMM. The regimen of Xd plus PIs or IMiDs was recommended.

Liposomal nanocarriers containing siRNA as small molecule-based drugs to overcome cancer drug resistance

This review discusses the application of nanoliposomes containing siRNA/drug to overcome multidrug resistance for all types of cancer treatments. As drug resistance-associated factors are overexpressed in many cancer cell types, pumping chemotherapy drugs out of the cytoplasm leads to an inadequate therapeutic response. The siRNA/drug-loaded nanoliposomes are a promising approach to treating multidrug-resistant cancer, as they can effectively transmit a small-molecule drug into the target cytoplasm, ensuring that the drug binds efficiently. Moreover, nanoliposome-based therapeutics with advances in nanotechnology can effectively deliver siRNA to cancer cells. Overall, nanoliposomes have the potential to effectively deliver siRNA and small-molecule drugs in a targeted manner and are thus a promising tool for the treatment of cancer and other diseases.

Recent Advances in the Applications of Small Molecules in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Therapy for multiple myeloma (MM), a hematologic neoplasm of plasma cells, has undergone remarkable changes over the past 25 years. Small molecules (molecular weight of less than one kDa), together with newer immunotherapies that include monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and most recently, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, have combined to double the disease's five-year survival rate to over 50% during the past few decades. Despite these advances, the disease is still considered incurable, and its treatment continues to pose substantial challenges, since therapeutic refractoriness and patient relapse are exceedingly common. This review focuses on the current pipeline, along with the contemporary roles and future prospects for small molecules in MM therapy. While small molecules offer prospective benefits in terms of oral bioavailability, cellular penetration, simplicity of preparation, and improved cost-benefit considerations, they also pose problems of toxicity due to off-target effects. Highlighted in the discussion are recent developments in the applications of alkylating agents, immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, apoptosis inducers, kinesin spindle protein inhibitors, blockers of nuclear transport, and drugs that affect various kinases involved in intracellular signaling pathways. Molecular and cellular targets are described for each class of agents in relation to their roles as drivers of MM.

Searching for Novel Noncovalent Nuclear Export Inhibitors through a Drug Repurposing Approach

Chromosomal region maintenance protein 1 (CRM1) is a validated anticancer drug target, and its covalent inhibitor KPT-330 has been approved for marketing. However, the development of CRM1 inhibitors, especially the noncovalent ones, is still very limited. Drug repurposing is an effective strategy to develop drug leads for new targets. In this work, we virtually screened a library of marketed drugs and identified zafirlukast as a new CRM1 inhibitor. Biochemical and structural analysis revealed that zafirlukast was a noncovalent CRM1 inhibitor that bound to four subpockets in the nuclear-export-signal (NES) groove. Methylation of the sulfonamide group rendered zafirlukast completely inactive against CRM1. Zafirlukast inhibited the growth of a variety of cancer cells and worked synergistically with the drug doxorubicin. Taken together, these works laid a solid foundation for reshaping zafirlukast as a valuable lead compound for further design of noncovalent, specific, and potent CRM1 inhibitors toward the treatment of various cancers.

The Therapeutic Synergy of Selinexor and Venetoclax in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Through Induction of DNA Damage and Perturbation of the DNA Damage Response

Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) can be stratified into blastoid and classical subtypes based on morphological features, with the former subtype having a poorer prognosis. Despite recent advances in targeted approaches, including multiple bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors which yield impressive clinical responses and improve prognoses, MCL remains an incurable disease with frequent relapses. Additional therapeutic interventions are therefore unmet medical needs for the management of patients with MCL. Methods: Cell viability and apoptosis assays were employed to analyze the therapeutic interaction of venetoclax combined with selinexor in MCL cells. Western blot was used to investigate the potential mechanism of action for the synergy of venetoclax in combination with selinexor in MCL cells. Results: In this study, we revealed that both blastoid and classical MCL cells were vulnerable to the cytotoxic effects of selinexor, a well-established XPO1 inhibitor, manifested by loss of cell viability and induction of cell apoptosis. Moreover, our data indicated that the addition of venetoclax to selinexor showed synergistically decreased cell viabilities and increased cell deaths in blastoid and classical MCL cells compared to each single drug treatment. Either selinexor or venetoclax treatment alone decreased MCL1 expressions and increased BAX levels in MCL cells, and these effects were further enhanced by their combined regimen. Mechanistically, our findings demonstrated that induction of DNA damage and inactivation of DNA damage response were involved in the synergistic interaction of the drug combination regimen. Conclusion: Collectively, this study might provide a potential attractive therapy option for the treatment of MCL. However, the conclusion needs additional experimental validation in in vivo models and clinical evaluations are mandatory.

Current perspectives on interethnic variability in multiple myeloma: Single cell technology, population pharmacogenetics and molecular signal transduction

•

This review discusses the emerging single cell technologies and applications in Multiple myeloma (MM), population pharmacogenetics of MM, resistance to chemotherapy, genetic determinants of drug-induced toxicity, molecular signal transduction.

•

The role(s) of epigenetics and noncoding RNAs including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) that influence the risk and severity of MM are also discussed.

•

It is understood that ethnic component acts as a driver of variable response to chemotherapy in different sub-populations globally.

•

This review augments our understanding of genetic variability in ‘myelomagenesis’ and drug-induced toxicity, myeloma microenvironment at the molecular and cellular level, and developing precision medicine strategies to combat this malignancy.

•

The emerging single cell technologies hold great promise for enhancing our understanding of MM tumor heterogeneity and clonal diversity.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an aggressive cancer characterised by malignancy of the plasma cells and a rising global incidence. The gold standard for optimum response is aggressive chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, majority of the patients are above 60 years and this presents the clinician with complications such as ineligibility for ASCT, frailty, drug-induced toxicity and differential/partial response to treatment. The latter is partly driven by heterogenous genotypes of the disease in different subpopulations. In this review, we discuss emerging single cell technologies and applications in MM, population pharmacogenetics of MM, resistance to chemotherapy, genetic determinants of drug-induced toxicity, molecular signal transduction, as well as the role(s) played by epigenetics and noncoding RNAs including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) that influence the risk and severity of the disease. Taken together, our discussions further our understanding of genetic variability in ‘myelomagenesis’ and drug-induced toxicity, augment our understanding of the myeloma microenvironment at the molecular and cellular level and provide a basis for developing precision medicine strategies to combat this malignancy.

An integrated multi-omics analysis of topoisomerase family in pan-cancer: Friend or foe?

BACKGROUND

Topoisomerases are nuclear enzymes that get to the bottom of topological troubles related with DNA all through a range of genetic procedures. More and more studies have shown that topoisomerase-mediated DNA cleavage plays crucial roles in tumor cell death and carcinogenesis. There is however still a lack of comprehensive multi-omics studies related to topoisomerase family genes from a pan-cancer perspective.

METHODS

In this study, a multiomics pan-cancer analysis of topoisomerase family genes was conducted by integrating over 10,000 multi-dimensional cancer genomic data across 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), 481 small molecule drug response data from cancer therapeutics response portal (CTRP) as well as normal tissue data from Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx). Finally, overall activity-level analyses of topoisomerase in pan-cancers were performed by gene set variation analysis (GSVA), together with differential expression, clinical relevancy, immune cell infiltration and regulation of cancer-related pathways.

RESULTS

Dysregulated gene expression of topoisomerase family were related to genomic changes and abnormal epigenetic modifications. The expression levels of topoisomerase family genes could significantly impact cancer progression, intratumoral heterogeneity, alterations in the immunological condition and regulation of the cancer marker-related pathways, which in turn caused the differences in potential drugs sensitivity and the distinct prognosis of patients.

CONCLUSION

It was anticipated that topoisomerase family genes would become novel prognostic biomarkers for cancer patients and provide new insights for the diagnosis and treatment of tumors.

TOP2A inhibition reverses drug resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma to regorafenib

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death attributed to high frequency of metastasis and multiple drug resistance. We aim to examine the underlying molecular mechanism and to seek potential strategies to reverse primary/acquired resistance to regorafenib. Topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A) is critical for tumorigenesis and carcinogenesis. Clinically, high-TOP2A expression was correlated to shorter overall survival (OS) of patients, but its role in drug resistance of HCC remains unknown. Here, we screened the expression profiling of TOP2A in HCC and identified TOP2A as an upregulated gene involved in the resistance to regorafenib. Sustained exposure of HCC cells to regorafenib could upregulate the expression of TOP2A. Silencing TOP2A enhanced HCC cells' sensitivity to regorafenib. TOP2A inhibition by doxorubicin or epirubicin synergized with regorafenib to suppress the growth of sorafenib-resistant HCC tumors that possessed the sorafenib-resistant features both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, targeting TOP2A may be a promising therapeutic strategy to alleviate resistance to regorafenib and thus improving the efficacy of HCC treatment.

Selinexor therapy for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review we highlight the most recent studies furthering the clinical development of selinexor, a novel exportin-1 inhibitor, for the treatment of multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three pivotal trials, the SADAL trial for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and the BOSTON and selinexor treatment of refractory myeloma trials for multiple myeloma, have recently led to the regulatory approval of selinexor monotherapy or combination regimens. They are complemented by several earlier phase clinical trials with iterative combinations, adding selinexor to novel therapies and cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens at various stages in the disease courses. In some, selinexor appears synergistic, occasionally overcoming treatment refractoriness, whereas in other situations appears additive. Consistent issues with tolerability are seen across trials, although consensus guidelines on their preemption and management have recently been adopted which may improve treatment success. While comparative data are lacking, the efficacy of selinexor-based regimens does not approach that of contemporaneous cellular and immunotherapies.

SUMMARY

Selinexor is a novel and potentially synergistic therapy for lymphoid malignancies, although requires refined supportive measures and strategies to improve its efficacy. Likely, for continued success, it will need to identify niches that complement recent advances, such as bridging to cellular therapies or maintenance thereafter.

Meta analysis of bioactive compounds, miRNA, siRNA and cell death regulators as sensitizers to doxorubicin induced chemoresistance

Cancer has presented to be the most challenging disease, contributing to one in six mortalities worldwide. The current treatment regimen involves multiple rounds of chemotherapy administration, alone or in combination. The treatment has adverse effects including cardiomyopathy, hepatotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity. In addition, the development of resistance to chemo has been attributed to cancer relapse and low patient overall survivability. Multiple drug resistance development may be through numerous factors such as up-regulation of drug transporters, drug inactivation, alteration of drug targets and drug degradation. Doxorubicin is a widely used first line chemotherapeutic drug for a myriad of cancers. It has multiple intracellular targets, DNA intercalation, adduct formation, topoisomerase inhibition, iron chelation, reactive oxygen species generation and promotes immune mediated clearance of the tumor. Agents that can sensitize the resistant cancer cells to the chemotherapeutic drug are currently the focus to improve the clinical efficiency of cancer therapy. This review summarizes the recent 10-year research on the use of natural phytochemicals, inhibitors of apoptosis and autophagy, miRNAs, siRNAs and nanoformulations being investigated for doxorubicin chemosensitization.

Nuclear Export Inhibition for Radiosensitization; a Proof-of-Concept Phase I Clinical Trial of Selinexor (KPT-330) Combined with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Selinexor (KPT-330, XPOVIO®) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound that blocks XPO1, forcing nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins. Selinexor potentiates radiation-induced cell death in preclinical models, but has yet to be combined with radiation in the clinic. We hypothesized that selinexor would increase the activity of neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (ChRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

A phase I clinical trial of selinexor plus ChRT for LARC was performed, 3+3 design. Eligibility criteria included stage II-III LARC requiring neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and ECOG 0-1 performance status. Patients received 50.4 Gy over 5.5 weeks plus capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily on radiation days. Three selinexor dose-levels were tested: 1) 20 mg/m² twice weekly concurrent with ChRT, 2) 35 mg/m² twice weekly concurrent with ChRT, and 3) 35 mg/m² twice weekly concurrent with ChRT, and for an additional two weeks. Subsequently, patients underwent definitive curative resection. DNA variant analysis and RNAseq were performed to characterize responders.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were enrolled, median age 60.5 years, six were stage III. Nine completed selinexor plus ChRT; two patients withdrew consent. Side effects attributed to selinexor included fatigue, hyponatremia and mild thrombocytopenia. Dose level 3 was poorly tolerated, (dehydration, anorexia). Of the 9 patients who completed treatment, median volumetric tumor shrinkage was 93% (IQR 59-98). Comparing baseline clinical stage to final pathological stage, 82% of patients were down-staged. Two patients experienced a complete / near-complete pathological response. Expression of PTGS2 and CD177 were identified as potential biomarkers of response.

CONCLUSION

Selinexor combined with neoadjuvant ChRT in LARC is well tolerated. Potential biomarkers were identified based upon a preliminary analysis.

The molecular mechanism and challenge of targeting XPO1 in treatment of relapsed and refractory myeloma

•

Significant progress has been made on the treatment of MM during past two decades.

•

Acquired drug-resistance continues to drive early relapse in primary refractory MM.

•

XPO1 over-expression and cargo mislocalization are associated with drug-resistance.

•

XPO1 inhibitor selinexor restores drug sensitivity to subsets of RR-MM cells.

Multiple myeloma (MM) treatment regimens have vastly improved since the introduction of immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies; however, MM is considered an incurable disease due to inevitable relapse and acquired drug resistance. Understanding the molecular mechanism by which drug resistance is acquired will help create novel strategies to prevent relapse and help develop novel therapeutics to treat relapsed/refractory (RR)-MM patients. Currently, only homozygous deletion/mutation of TP53 gene due to “double-hits” on Chromosome 17p region is consistently associated with a poor prognosis. The exciting discovery of XPO1 overexpression and mislocalization of its cargos in the RR-MM cells has led to a novel treatment options. Clinical studies have demonstrated that the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor can restore sensitivity of RR-MM to PIs and dexamethasone. We will elaborate on the problems of MM treatment strategies and discuss the mechanism and challenges of using XPO1 inhibitors in RR-MM therapies while deliberating potential solutions.

Dual-Targeted Therapy Circumvents Non-Genetic Drug Resistance to Targeted Therapy

The introduction of various targeted agents into the armamentarium of cancer treatment has revolutionized the standard care of patients with cancer. However, like conventional chemotherapy, drug resistance, either preexisting (primary or intrinsic resistance) or developed following treatment (secondary or acquired resistance), remains the Achilles heel of all targeted agents with no exception, via either genetic or non-genetic mechanisms. In the latter, emerging evidence supports the notion that intracellular signaling pathways for tumor cell survival act as a mutually interdependent network via extensive cross-talks and feedback loops. Thus, dysregulations of multiple signaling pathways usually join forces to drive oncogenesis, tumor progression, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance, thereby providing a basis for so-called "bypass" mechanisms underlying non-genetic resistance in response to targeted agents. In this context, simultaneous interruption of two or more related targets or pathways (an approach called dual-targeted therapy, DTT), via either linear or parallel inhibition, is required to deal with such a form of drug resistance to targeted agents that specifically inhibit a single oncoprotein or oncogenic pathway. Together, while most types of tumor cells are often addicted to two or more targets or pathways or can switch their dependency between them, DTT targeting either intrinsically activated or drug-induced compensatory targets/pathways would efficiently overcome drug resistance caused by non-genetic events, with a great opportunity that those resistant cells might be particularly more vulnerable. In this review article, we discuss, with our experience, diverse mechanisms for non-genetic resistance to targeted agents and the rationales to circumvent them in the treatment of cancer, emphasizing hematologic malignancies.

Targeting Nuclear Export Proteins in Multiple Myeloma Therapy

Nuclear export proteins such as exportin-1 (XPO1) transport tumor-suppressor proteins and other growth-regulatory proteins from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Overexpression of XPO1 has been observed in several cancers and correlates with shorter event-free and overall survival in multiple myeloma. Selinexor was developed as an oral first-in-class selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) that inhibits XPO1. Preclinical studies in tumor cell lines and mouse models have demonstrated the efficacy of selinexor both as a single agent and in various combinations with known active antimyeloma agents. Results from the pivotal phase II STORM trial led to the US FDA approval of selinexor with dexamethasone in penta-refractory myeloma. Because of the feasibility of combining selinexor with other active antimyeloma agents, the multiarm STOMP trial was initiated and is ongoing, with impressive response rates reported in some of the combination arms thus far. The registrational phase III BOSTON trial demonstrated the superiority of selinexor in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone as compared with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received one to three prior anti-MM regimens. The toxicity profile of selinexor is well established and predictable and may be significant unless managed aggressively and preemptively. The most common side effects are thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, anorexia, and weight loss. Hyponatremia and cataracts seem to be class effects. Other SINE compounds are now being studied in efforts to discover agents that will potentially be better tolerated. Eltanexor is an investigational SINE compound that has shown a more positive toxicity profile in preclinical studies, with reduced central nervous system penetration and gastrointestinal side effects, and is now undergoing clinical investigation. These and other trials will further clarify the role of these innovative agents in the therapeutic advancement of RRMM.

A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO1) with efficacy in various solid and hematologic tumors. We assessed intratumoral penetration, safety, and efficacy of selinexor monotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-six adults with Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 60 were enrolled. Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery received up to three selinexor doses (twice weekly) preoperatively (Arm A; n = 8 patients). Patients not undergoing surgery received 50 mg/m2 (Arm B, n = 24), or 60 mg (Arm C, n = 14) twice weekly, or 80 mg once weekly (Arm D; n = 30). Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6).

RESULTS

Median selinexor concentrations in resected tumors from patients receiving presurgical selinexor was 105.4 nmol/L (range 39.7-291 nmol/L). In Arms B, C, and D, respectively, the PFS6 was 10% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.79-35.9], 7.7% (95% CI, 1.17-50.6), and 17% (95% CI, 7.78-38.3). Measurable reduction in tumor size was observed in 19 (28%) and RANO-response rate overall was 8.8% [Arm B, 8.3% (95% CI, 1.0-27.0); C: 7.7% (95% CI, 0.2-36.0); D: 10% (95% CI, 2.1-26.5)], with one complete and two durable partial responses in Arm D. Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26 (34%) patients; 1 (1.3%) was fatal. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (61%), nausea (59%), decreased appetite (43%), and thrombocytopenia (43%), and were manageable by supportive care and dose modification. Molecular studies identified a signature predictive of response (AUC = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

At 80 mg weekly, single-agent selinexor induced responses and clinically relevant PFS6 with manageable side effects requiring dose reductions. Ongoing trials are evaluating safety and efficacy of selinexor in combination with other therapies for newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma.

Targeting XPO1-Dependent Nuclear Export in Cancer

Nucleocytoplasmic transport of macromolecules is tightly regulated in eukaryotic cells. XPO1 is a transport factor responsible for the nuclear export of several hundred protein and RNA substrates. Elevated levels of XPO1 and recurrent mutations have been reported in multiple cancers and linked to advanced disease stage and poor survival. In recent years, several novel small-molecule inhibitors of XPO1 were developed and extensively tested in preclinical cancer models and eventually in clinical trials. In this brief review, we summarize the functions of XPO1, its role in cancer, and the latest results of clinical trials of XPO1 inhibitors.

Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Selinexor-Based Treatment in Multiple Myeloma, a Meta-Analysis Based on Prospective Clinical Trials

Background: Selinexor (SEL) is an orally bioavailable, highly-selective, and slowly-reversible small molecule that inhibits Exportin 1. Preclinical studies showed that SEL had synergistic antimyeloma activity with glucocorticoids, proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulators. The combination of selinexor and dexamethasone (DEX) has been approved in the United States for patients with penta-refractory multiple myeloma in July 2019. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of selinexor based treatment in Multiple myeloma. Methods: We systematically searched the Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Library databases and ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcome measures of efficacy included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), stringent complete response rate (sCR), complete response rate (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response rate (PR), minimal response (MR), rate of stable disease (SDR), rate of progressive disease (PDR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Safety was evaluated by the incidences of all grade adverse events and Grade≥3 adverse events. The subgroup analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in different combination treatment regimens (SEL + DEX + PIs vs SEL + DEX). Results: We included six studies with 477 patients. The pooled ORR, CBR, sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, MR, SDR, and PDR were 43% (18-67%), 55% (32-78%), 5% (-2-13%), 7% (4-11%), 14% (5-24%), 23% (15-31%), 11% (8-14%), 26% (14-38%) and 14% (4-23%), respectively. SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had higher ORR (54 vs 24%, p = 0.01), CBR (66 vs 37%, p = 0.01), sCR (10 vs 2%, p = 0.0008), and VGPR (23 vs 5%, p < 0.00001) compared to SEL + DEX treatment, and lower PDR (4 vs 23%, p < 0.00001) and SDR (17 vs 37%, p = 0.0006). The pooled incidences of any grade and grade≥3 were 45 and 30% in hematological AEs, and in non-hematological AEs were 40 and 30%, respectively. The most common all grade (68%) and grade≥3 (54%) hematological AE were both thrombocytopenia. Fatigue was the most common all grade (62%) and grade≥3 (16%) non-hematological AE. Compared to SEL + DEX treatment, SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had lower incidences of hyponatremia (39 vs 12%, p < 0.00001), nausea (72 vs 52%, p < 0.00001), vomiting (41 vs 23%, p < 0.0001), and weight loss (42 vs 17%, p = 0.03) in all grade AEs. Meanwhile, SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had lower incidences of anemia (36 vs 16%, p = 0.02), fatigue (20 vs 13%, p = 0.04), hyponatremia (22 vs 5%, p < 0.0001) than SEL + DEX treatment in grade≥3 AEs. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis revealed that selinexor-based regimens could offer reasonable efficacy and tolerable adverse events in patients with multiple myeloma. SEL + DEX + PIs treatments had higher efficacy and lower toxicities than SEL + DEX.

Targeted Therapies in Cancer: To Be or Not to Be, Selective

Development of targeted therapies in recent years revealed several nonchemotherapeutic options for patients. Chief among targeted therapies is small molecule kinase inhibitors targeting key oncogenic signaling proteins. Through competitive and noncompetitive inhibition of these kinases, and therefore the pathways they activate, cancers can be slowed or completely eradicated, leading to partial or complete remissions for many cancer types. Unfortunately, for many patients, resistance to targeted therapies, such as kinase inhibitors, ultimately develops and can necessitate multiple lines of treatment. Drug resistance can either be de novo or acquired after months or years of drug exposure. Since resistance can be due to several unique mechanisms, there is no one-size-fits-all solution to this problem. However, combinations that target complimentary pathways or potential escape mechanisms appear to be more effective than sequential therapy. Combinations of single kinase inhibitors or alternately multikinase inhibitor drugs could be used to achieve this goal. Understanding how to efficiently target cancer cells and overcome resistance to prior lines of therapy became imperative to the success of cancer treatment. Due to the complexity of cancer, effective treatment options in the future will likely require mixing and matching these approaches in different cancer types and different disease stages.

Targeting Nuclear Export Proteins in Multiple Myeloma Therapy

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignancy of plasma cells with a clinical course characterized by multiple relapses and treatment refractoriness. While recent treatment advancements have extended overall survival (OS), refractory MM has a poor prognosis, with a median OS of between 4 and 6 months. Nuclear export inhibition, specifically inhibition of CRM1/XPO1, is an emerging novel treatment modality that has shown promise in treatment-refractory MM. Initially discovered in yeast in 1983, early clinical applications were met with significant toxicities that limited their utility. The creation of small molecule inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) has improved on toxicity limitations and has led to investigation in a number of malignancies at the preclinical and clinical stages. Preclinical studies of SINEs in MM have shown that these molecules are cytotoxic to myeloma cells, play a role in therapy resensitization, and suggest a role in limiting bone disease progression. In July 2019, selinexor became the first nuclear export inhibitor approved for use in relapsed/refractory MM based on the STORM trial. As of May 2020, there were eight ongoing trials combining selinexor with standard treatment regimens in relapsed/refractory MM. Eltanexor, a second-generation SINE, is also under investigation and has shown preliminary signs of efficacy in an early clinical trial while potentially having an improved toxicity profile compared with selinexor. Results in ongoing trials will help further define the role of SINEs in MM.

Selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma: Outcomes by cytogenetic risk

In the phase 3 BOSTON study, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after 1-3 prior regimens were randomized to once-weekly selinexor (an oral inhibitor of exportin 1 [XPO1]) plus bortezomib-dexamethasone (XVd) or twice-weekly bortezomib-dexamethasone (Vd). Compared with Vd, XVd was associated with significant improvements in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and lower rates of peripheral neuropathy, with trends in overall survival (OS) favoring XVd. In BOSTON, 141 (35.1%) patients had MM with high-risk (presence of del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], or ≥4 copies of amp1q21) cytogenetics (XVd, n = 70; Vd, n = 71), and 261 (64.9%) exhibited standard-risk cytogenetics (XVd, n = 125; Vd, n = 136). Among patients with high-risk MM, median PFS was 12.91 months for XVd and 8.61 months for Vd (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, (0.4673, 1.1406)], p = 0.082), and ORRs were 78.6% and 57.7%, respectively (OR 2.68; p = 0.004). In the standard-risk subgroup, median PFS was 16.62 months for XVd and 9.46 months for Vd (HR 0.61; p = 0.004), and ORRs were 75.2% and 64.7%, respectively (OR 1.65; p = 0.033). The safety profiles of XVd and Vd in both subgroups were consistent with the overall population. These data suggest that selinexor can confer benefits to patients with MM regardless of cytogenetic risk. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03110562.

XPO1 inhibition synergizes with PARP1 inhibition in small cell lung cancer by targeting nuclear transport of FOXO3a

Patient mortality rates have remained stubbornly high for the past decades in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) because of having no standard targeted therapies with confirmed advantages at present. Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown promise in preclinical models but have had unsatisfactory clinical results in SCLC. By RNA-seq and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (ITRAQ), we revealed that PARP1 inhibition led to the relocalization of forkhead box-O3a (FOXO3a) from nuclear to cytoplasm. By performing co-Immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout plasmid we showed that FOXO3a was subject to exportin 1 (XPO1)-dependent nuclear export. We demonstrated the effects of the PARP inhibitor BMN673 on apoptosis and DNA damage were markedly enhanced by simultaneous inhibition of XPO1 in vitro. The combination of BMN673 and the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor inhibited primary SCLC cell proliferation in mini-patient-derived xenotransplants (miniPDXs) and markedly inhibited tumor growth without significant toxicity in xenograft models. The efficacy was enhanced for more than 2.5 times, compared to the single agent. Based on these findings, we further designed a novel dual PARP-XPO1 inhibitor and showed its effectiveness in SCLC. In this work, we illustrated that combining a PARP inhibitor with an XPO1 inhibitor is associated with significantly improved efficacy and tolerability. Dual PARP-XPO1 inhibition restored the FOXO3a balance and activity in SCLC. Collectively, targeting PARP1 and XPO1 opens new avenues for therapeutic intervention against SCLC, warranting further investigation in potential clinical trials.

The paradoxical pharmacological mechanisms of lenalidomide and bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma

The combination of bortezomib (Velcade, PS-341) and lenalidomide (Revlimid) for the treatment of multiple myeloma was proved by USA Food and Drug Administration in 2006. Lenalidomide prevents the proliferation of multiple myeloma cells through binding to cereblon and promoting the ubiquitinational degradation of IKZF1 (Ikaros)/IKZF3 (Aiolos). However, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib would inhibit the ubiquitinational degradation of IKZF1/IKZF3. How bortezomib could not block the antiproliferative effect of lenalidomide on multiple myeloma cells, which is the paradoxical pharmacological mechanisms in multiple myeloma. In this review, we summarized recent advances in molecular mechanisms underlying the combination of bortezomib and lenalidomide for the treatment multiple myeloma, discussed the paradoxical pharmacological mechanisms of lenalidomide and bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

The nuclear export protein XPO1 - from biology to targeted therapy

Exportin 1 (XPO1), also known as chromosome region maintenance protein 1, plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular homeostasis via the regulated export of a range of cargoes, including proteins and several classes of RNAs, from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Dysregulation of this protein plays a pivotal role in the development of various solid and haematological malignancies. Furthermore, XPO1 is associated with resistance to several standard-of-care therapies, including chemotherapies and targeted therapies, making it an attractive target of novel cancer therapies. Over the years, a number of selective inhibitors of nuclear export have been developed. However, only selinexor has been clinically validated. The novel mechanism of action of XPO1 inhibitors implies a different toxicity profile to that of other agents and has proved challenging in certain settings. Nonetheless, data from clinical trials have led to the approval of the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor (plus dexamethasone) as a fifth-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma and as a monotherapy for patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. In this Review, we summarize the progress and challenges in the development of nuclear export inhibitors and discuss the potential of emerging combination therapies and biomarkers of response.

The selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) verdinexor exhibits biologic activity against canine osteosarcoma cell lines

Verdinexor (KPT-335) is a novel orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound that inhibits the function of the nuclear export protein Exportin 1 (XPO1/CRM1). In the present study, we sought to characterize the expression of XPO1 in primary canine osteosarcoma (OS) tumour samples, OS cell lines and normal osteoblasts and evaluate the in vitro activity of verdinexor alone or in combination with doxorubicin. Canine OS cell lines and a subset of primary OS tumours showed increased XPO1 transcript and protein expression as compared with normal canine osteoblast cells. All canine OS cell lines exhibited dose-dependent growth inhibition and increased caspase 3,7 activity in response to low nanomolar concentrations of verdinexor (IC₅₀ concentrations ranging from 21 to 74 nM). Notably, growth inhibition of normal canine osteoblast cell lines treated with verdinexor was observed at high micromolar concentrations (IC₅₀  = 21 μM). The combination of verdinexor and doxorubicin resulted in potent inhibition of cell viability and demonstrated synergetic activity in three canine OS cell lines. Concordantly, OS cell lines showed increased γH2A.X foci following treatment with doxorubicin and recovery in verdinexor compared with cells treated with doxorubicin and recovered in normal media for 24 hours. These findings demonstrate that verdinexor has biologic activity against canine OS cell lines at physiologically relevant doses and suggest that XPO1 inhibition in combination with standard doxorubicin treatment offers promising potential for chemotherapeutic intervention in canine OS.

Integration of EMT and cellular survival instincts in reprogramming of programmed cell death to anastasis

Apoptosis is a tightly controlled, coordinated cellular event responsible for inducing programmed cell death to rid the body of defective or unfit cells. Inhibition of apoptosis is, therefore, an essential process for cancer cells to harness. Genomic variants in apoptotic-controlling genes are highly prevalent in cancer and have been identified to induce pro-proliferation and pro-survival pathways, rendering cancer cells resistant to apoptosis. Traditional understanding of apoptosis defines it as an irreversible process; however, growing evidence suggests that apoptosis is a reversible process from which cells can escape, even after the activation of its most committed stages. The mechanism invoked to reverse apoptosis has been termed anastasis and poses challenges for the development and utilization of chemotherapeutic agents. Anastasis has also been identified as a mechanism by which cells can recover from apoptotic lesions and revert back to its previous functioning state. In this review, we intend to focus the attention of the reader on the comprehensive role of survival, metastasis, and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), as well as DNA damage repair mechanisms in promoting anastasis. Additionally, we will emphasize the mechanistic consequences of anastasis on drug resistance and recent rational therapeutic approaches designed to combat this resistance.

Glycosyl disulfides: importance, synthesis and application to chemical and biological systems

This review explores methodologies for the preparation of glycosyl disulfides, their utility as intermediates in carbohydrate synthesis, and evaluates their biological impact in glycoscience and beyond.

Melphalan and Exportin 1 Inhibitors Exert Synergistic Antitumor Effects in Preclinical Models of Human Multiple Myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by autologous transplantation is a first-line treatment for multiple myeloma. Here, we present preclinical evidence that this treatment may be significantly improved by the addition of exportin 1 inhibitors (XPO1i). The XPO1i selinexor, eltanexor, and KOS-2464 sensitized human multiple myeloma cells to melphalan. Human 8226 and U266 multiple myeloma cell lines and melphalan-resistant cell lines (8226-LR5 and U266-LR6) were highly sensitized to melphalan by XPO1i. Multiple myeloma cells from newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients were also sensitized by XPO1i to melphalan. In NOD/SCIDγ mice challenged with either parental 8226 or U266 multiple myeloma and melphalan-resistant multiple myeloma tumors, XPO1i/melphalan combination treatments demonstrated stronger synergistic antitumor effects than single-agent melphalan with minimal toxicity. Synergistic cell death resulted from increased XPO1i/melphalan-induced DNA damage in a dose-dependent manner and decreased DNA repair. In addition, repair of melphalan-induced DNA damage was inhibited by selinexor, which decreased melphalan-induced monoubiquitination of FANCD2 in multiple myeloma cells. Knockdown of FANCD2 was found to replicate the effect of selinexor when used with melphalan, increasing DNA damage (γH2AX) by inhibiting DNA repair. Thus, combination therapies that include selinexor or eltanexor with melphalan may have the potential to improve treatment outcomes of multiple myeloma in melphalan-resistant and newly diagnosed patients. The combination of selinexor and melphalan is currently being investigated in the context of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplant (NCT02780609). SIGNIFICANCE: Inhibition of exportin 1 with selinexor synergistically sensitizes human multiple myeloma to melphalan by inhibiting Fanconi anemia pathway-mediated DNA repair.

TOP2A expression predicts responsiveness to carfilzomib in myeloma and informs novel combinatorial strategies for enhanced proteasome inhibitor cell killing

Microarray was utilized to determine if a genetic signature associated with resistance to carfilzomib (CFZ) could be identified. Twelve human myeloma (MM) cell lines (HMCLs) were treated with CFZ and a cell-viability profile was assessed categorizing HMCLs as sensitive or resistant to CFZ. The gene expression profiles (GEP) of untreated resistant versus sensitive HMCLs revealed 29 differentially expressed genes. TOP2A, an enzyme involved in cell cycle and proliferation, was overexpressed in carfilzomib-resistant HMCLs. TOP2A protein expression levels, evaluated utilizing trephine biopsy specimens acquired prior to treatment with proteasome inhibitors, were higher in patients failing to achieve a response when compared to responding patients. Logistic-regression analysis confirmed that TOP2A protein expression was a highly significant predictor of response to PIs (AUC 0.738). Further, the combination of CFZ with TOP2A inhibitors, demonstrated synergistic cytotoxic effects in vitro, providing a rationale for combining topoisomerase inhibitors with CFZ to overcome resistance in MM.

Hegazy ME, Naqishbandi AM, Efferth T. Induction of Apoptosis, Autophagy and Ferroptosis by Thymus vulgaris and Arctium lappa Extract in Leukemia and Multiple Myeloma Cell Lines

Thymus vulgaris and Arctium lappa have been used as a folk remedy in the Iraqi Kurdistan region to deal with different health problems. The aim of the current study is to investigate the cytotoxicity of T. vulgaris and A. lappa in leukemia and multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines and determine the mode of cell death triggered by the most potent cytotoxic fractions of both plants in MM. Resazurin assay was used to evaluate cytotoxic and ferroptosis activity, apoptosis, and modulation in the cell cycle phase were investigated via Annexin V-FITC/PI dual stain and cell-cycle arrest assays. Furthermore, we used western blotting assay for the determination of autophagy cell death. n-Hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and butanol fractions of T. vulgaris and A. lappa exhibited cytotoxicity in CCRF-CEM and CEM/ADR 5000 cell lines at concentration range 0.001–100 μg/mL with potential activity revealed by chloroform and ethyl acetate fractions. NCI-H929 displayed pronounced sensitivity towards T. vulgaris (TCF) and A. lappa (ACF) chloroform fractions with IC₅₀ values of 6.49 ± 1.48 and 21.9 ± 0.69 μg/mL, respectively. TCF induced apoptosis in NCI-H929 cells with a higher ratio (71%), compared to ACF (50%) at 4 × IC₅₀. ACF demonstrated more potent autophagy activity than TCF. TCF and ACF induced cell cycle arrest and ferroptosis. Apigenin and nobiletin were identified in TCF, while nobiletin, ursolic acid, and lupeol were the main compounds identified in ACF. T. vulgaris and A. lappa could be considered as potential herbal drug candidates, which arrest cancer cell proliferation by induction of apoptosis, autophagic, and ferroptosis.

Selinexor: a first-in-class SINE compound for treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma

The progression of multiple myeloma is accompanied by complex cytogenetic and epigenetic alterations that include mutation or functional inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins and overexpression of oncoproteins. Patients whose myeloma is refractory to the three major classes of drugs including immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies have a very poor prognosis. Drugs with novel mechanisms of action that can bypass resistance mechanisms are sorely needed for this group of patients. Selinexor represents a novel, oral agent with an innovative mechanism of action that offers a significant therapeutic advance in this group of heavily treated patients. Moreover, this novel mechanism may provide additional options for patients with less refractory disease.

Molecular avenues in targeted doxorubicin cancer therapy

In recent, intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity is seen as one of key factors behind success and failure of chemotherapy. Incessant use of doxorubicin (DOX) drug is associated with numerous post-treatment debacles including cardiomyopathy, health disorders, reversal of tumor and formation of secondary tumors. The module of cancer treatment has undergone evolutionary changes by achieving crucial understanding on molecular, genetic, epigenetic and environmental adaptations by cancer cells. Therefore, there is a paradigm shift in cancer therapeutic by employing amalgam of peptide mimetic, small RNA mimetic, DNA repair protein inhibitors, signaling inhibitors and epigenetic modulators to achieve targeted and personalized DOX therapy. This review summarizes on recent therapeutic avenues that can potentiate DOX effects by removing discernible pitfalls among cancer patients.

Selinexor for the treatment of multiple myeloma

Introduction: Despite unprecedented advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), almost all patients develop a disease that is resistant to the five most commonly used and active anti-MM agents. The prognosis for this patient population is particularly poor resulting in an unmet need for additional therapeutic options. Exportin-1 (XPO-1) is a major nuclear export protein of macromolecular cargo frequently overexpressed in MM. Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral Selective-Inhibitor-of-Nuclear-Export (SINE) compound that impedes XPO-1. Based on results of the STORM-trial, selinexor in combination with dexamethasone was granted accelerated FDA approval for patients with penta-refractory MM in July 2019.Areas covered: This article summarizes our up-to-date knowledge on the pathophysiologic role of XPO-1 in MM. Furthermore, it reviews the most recent clinical data on selinexor in combination with dexamethasone and other anti-MM agents; and discusses its safety profile, management strategies; and potential future developments.Expert opinion: Selinexor represents a next-generation-novel agent with an innovative mechanism of action that marks a significant advance in the treatment of heavily pretreated MM patients. Ongoing studies investigate its therapeutic potential also in earlier lines of therapy. Additional data is needed to confirm that selinexor and other SINE compounds are a valuable addition to our current therapeutic armamentarium.

Selinexor in combination with decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from a phase 1 study

Current treatment options for older and relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients are limited and represent an unmet need. Based on preclinical studies showing strong anti-leukemic effects in vivo, this phase I dose-escalation study assessed the safety and preliminary clinical activity of the oral exportin-1 inhibitor, selinexor, in combination with the hypomethylating agent, decitabine 20 mg/m2, in adults with R/R AML and in older (age ≥ 60) untreated AML patients. There were no protocol-defined dose limiting toxicities. The recommended phase 2 dose of selinexor was 60 mg (∼35 mg/m2) given twice-weekly. Notable grade ≥3 toxicities included asymptomatic hyponatremia (68%), febrile neutropenia (44%), sepsis (44%), hypophosphatemia (36%), and pneumonia (28%). In 25 patients, the overall response rate was 40%. Modification of selinexor to a flat dose of 60 mg, twice-weekly for two weeks after decitabine, improved tolerability of the regimen and demonstrated preliminary clinical activity in poor-risk patients with AML.

Upregulation of let-7f-2-3p by long noncoding RNA NEAT1 inhibits XPO1-mediated HAX-1 nuclear export in both in vitro and in vivo rodent models of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity

Clinical application of doxorubicin (Dox) is limited due to its undesirable side effects, especially cardiotoxicity. Several microRNAs (miRNAs) such as microRNA-140-5p and miR-23a aggravate Dox-induced cardiotoxicity. Here we demonstrate that upregulation of miRNA let-7f-2-3p by long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) NEAT1 inhibits exportin-1 (XPO1)-mediated nuclear export of hematopoietic-substrate-1 associated protein X-1 (HAX-1) in Dox-induced cardiotoxicity. Treatment of the H9c2 cells with the Dox (1 μM) for 6 h inhibited HAX-1 nuclear export and decreased XPO1 expression. Overexpression of XPO1 significantly attenuated the Dox-induced leakage of myocardial enzymes (creatine phosphokinase, creatine kinase-MB and lactate dehydrogenase) and cardiomyocyte apoptosis with the increased HAX-1 nuclear export. Differentially expressed miRNAs including let-7f-2-3p were selected from the Dox or vehicle-treated cardiomyocytes. TargetScan and luciferase assay showed that let-7f-2-3p targeted XPO1 3' UTR. Inhibition of let-7f-2-3p reduced Dox-induced cardiotoxicity and apoptosis by inhibiting XPO1-mediated HAX-1 nuclear export, whereas let-7f-2-3p overexpression aggravated these effects. In addition, lncRNA NEAT1 was identified as an endogenous sponge RNA to repress let-7f-2-3p expression. Overexpression of lncRNA NEAT1 abolished the increased let-7f-2-3p expression by Dox, and thereby attenuated cardiotoxicity. The loss function of let-7f-2-3p increased XPO1-mediated HAX-1 nuclear export and reduced myocardial injury in Dox (20 mg/kg)-treated rats. Importantly, let-7f-2-3p inhibition in mice alleviated Dox-induced cardiotoxicity and preserved the antitumor efficacy. Together, let-7f-2-3p regulated by lncRNA NEAT1 aggravates Dox-induced cardiotoxicity through inhibiting XPO1-mediated HAX-1 nuclear export, and may serve as a potential therapeutic target against Dox-induced cardiotoxicity.

Selective Inhibitors of Nuclear Export in the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies

The correct localization of molecules between nucleus and cytoplasm is fundamental for cellular homeostasis and is controlled by a bidirectional transport system. Exportin 1 (XPO1) regulates the passage of numerous cancer-related proteins. In this review, we summarize the development of a novel class of antitumor agents, known as selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINEs). We report results of preclinical studies and clinical trials, and discuss the mechanism of action of SINEs and their effects in multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphomas, lymphoblastic leukemia, and acute and chronic myeloid leukemia. In the future, the numerous experimental studies currently underway will allow us to define the role of SINEs and will possibly permit these substances to be introduced into daily clinical practice.