Matched and mismatched unrelated donor compared to autologous stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: a retrospective, propensity score-weighted analysis from the ALWP of the EBMT

PTCy versus ATG as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in mismatched unrelated stem cell transplantation

There is an increased risk of GVHD and of non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic stem cell transplantations (alloSCT) when mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) are used. In Europe, it is standard practice to use rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) to reduce the high NRM and GVHD risks after MMUD alloSCT. As an alternative to rATG, post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is in increasing clinical use. It is currently impossible to give general recommendations regarding preference for one method over another since comparative evidence from larger data sets is lacking. To improve the evidence base, we analyzed the outcome of rATG vs. PTCy prophylaxis in adult patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing first peripheral blood alloSCT from MMUD (9/10 antigen match) between Jan 2018 and June 2021 in the database of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). We performed multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. We included 2123 patients in the final analyses (PTCy, n = 583; rATG, n = 1540). p values and hazard ratios (HR) presented here are multivariate outcomes. Two years after alloSCT we found a lower NRM in the PTCy group of 18% vs. 24.9% in the rATG group; p = 0.028, HR 0.74. Overall survival in the PTCy cohort was higher with 65.7% vs. 55.7% in the rATG cohort; p < 0.001, HR 0.77. Progression-free survival was also better in the PTCy patients with 59.1% vs. 48.8% when using rATG; p = 0.001, 0.78. The incidences of chronic GVHD and acute GVHD were not significantly different between the groups. We found significantly lower NRM as well as higher survival in recipients of peripheral blood alloSCTs from MMUD receiving PTCy as compared to rATG. The results of the current analysis suggest an added value of PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis in MMUD alloSCT.

Sorafenib plus triplet therapy with venetoclax, azacitidine and homoharringtonine for refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-ITD: A multicenter phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) and FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) respond infrequently to salvage chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of sorafenib plus triplet therapy with venetoclax, azacitidine, and homoharringtonine (VAH) as a salvage therapy in this population.

METHODS

This multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study was conducted at 12 hospitals across China. Eligible patients had R/R AML with FLT3-ITD (aged 18-65 years) who were treated with VAH. The primary endpoint was composite complete remission (CRc) after two cycles. Secondary outcomes included the overall response rate (ORR), safety, and survival.

RESULTS

Between July 9, 2020, and March 19, 2022, 58 patients were assessed for eligibility, 51 of whom were enrolled. The median patient age was 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 31-57). CRc was 76.5% with ORR of 82.4%. At a median follow-up of 17.7 months (IQR, 8.7-24.7), the median duration of CRc was not reached (NR), overall survival was 18.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.8-NR) and event-free survival was 11.4 months (95% CI, 5.6-NR). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurring in ≥10% of patients included neutropenia in 47 (92.2%), thrombocytopenia in 41 (80.4%), anemia in 35 (68.6%), febrile neutropenia in 29 (56.9%), pneumonia in 13 (25.5%), and sepsis in 6 (11.8%) patients. Treatment-related death occurred in two (3.9%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The sorafenib plus VAH regimen was well tolerated and highly active against R/R AML with FLT3-ITD. This regimen may be a suitable therapeutic option for this population, but larger population trials are needed to be explored.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Registry: NCT04424147.

Auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or chemotherapy? Meta-analysis of clinical choice for AML

For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) or do not have a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor, it is unclear whether autologous SCT (ASCT) has a better prognosis after the first complete response (CR1) compared to further chemotherapy treatment. A meta-analysis evaluating ASCT compared to further chemotherapy for AML patients in CR1 was performed. The Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and National Knowledge Infrastructure of China databases were searched for relevant literature as of May 26, 2023. Eligible studies included prospectively enrolled adults with AML and randomized first-time respondent patients who did not have a matched sibling donor. Fourteen randomized controlled trials were identified and included 4281 participants, of which 1499 patients received ASCT and 2782 underwent chemotherapy and continued follow-up. In patients with AML in CR1, a lower relapse rate was associated with ASCT compared to chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.41-0.57]. Significant disease-free survival (DFS; OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.02-1.84) and relapse-free survival (RFS; OR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.28-6.02) ASCT benefits were documented, and there was no difference in the overall survival (OS) when the studies were pooled (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.85-1.48). The study results indicated that after the first remission, AML patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation had higher DFS and RFS, similar OS, and lower relapse compared to patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. This indicated that autologous stem cell transplantation may have a better prognosis.

The role of m6A demethylase FTO in chemotherapy resistance mediating acute myeloid leukemia relapse

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common hematopoietic malignancies, and chemotherapy resistance is one of the main causes of relapse. Because of lower survival rate for patients with relapse, it is pivotal to identify etiological factors responsible for chemo-resistance. In this work, direct MeRIP-seq analysis of sequential samples at stage of complete remission (CR) and relapse identifies that dysregulated N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) methylation is involved in this progression, and hypomethylated RNAs are related to cell differentiation. m⁶A demethylase FTO is overexpressed in relapse samples, which enhances the drug resistance of AML cells in vivo and in vitro. In addition, FTO knockdown cells exhibit stronger capacity of differentiation towards granules and myeloid lineages after cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) treatment. Mechanistically, FOXO3 is identified as a downstream target of FTO, the hypomethylation of FOXO3 mRNA affects its RNA degradation and further reduces its own expression, which ultimately result in attenuated cell differentiation. Collectively, these results demonstrate that FTO-m⁶A-FOXO3 is the main regulatory axis to affect the chemotherapy resistance of AML cells and FTO is a potential therapeutic target of chemotherapy resistance in AML.

Outcomes with mismatched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for various hematologic disorders. Alternative donor strategies such as mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) offer the option of HSCT to patients lacking a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes after MMUD-HSCT.

Methods

A literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from the inception date through April 6, 2022. After screening 2477 manuscripts, 19 studies were included. Data was extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Pooled analysis was done using the meta-package by Schwarzer et al. Proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed.

Results

A total of 3336 patients from 19 studies were included. The median age was 52.1 years, and 53% of recipients were males. The graft source was bone marrow in 19% and peripheral blood stem cells in 81% of recipients. The median time to transplant from hematologic diagnosis was 10 (1-247) months. Hematologic diagnoses included myeloid (82.9%), lymphoid (41.1%), and other disorders (3%). The reduced intensity and myeloablative conditioning were used in 65.6% and 32% of recipients, respectively. In-vivo T-cell depletion was performed in 56.7% of the patients. Most patients had one (87.9%) or two (11.4%) antigen HLA-mismatch. The pooled 1-year overall survival (OS) was 63.9% (95% CI 0.57-0.71, n=1426/2706), and the pooled 3-year OS was 42.1% (95% CI 0.34.2-0.50, n=907/2355). The pooled progression-free survival was 46.6% (95% CI 0.39-0.55, n=1295/3253) after a median follow-up of 1.8 (range 1-6) years. The pooled relapse rate was 26.8% (95% CI 0.22-0.32, n=972/3253) after a median follow-up of 2.25 (1-3) years. The pooled incidence of acute (grade II-IV) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD was 36.4% (95% CI 0.31-0.42, n=1131/3030) and 41.2% (95% CI 0.35-0.48, n=1337/3228), respectively. The pooled non-relapse mortality was 22.6% (95% CI 0.17-0.29, n=888/3196) after a median follow-up of 2.6 (1-5) years.

Conclusion

MMUD-HSCT has demonstrated favorable outcomes with an acceptable toxicity profile. It represents a promising option in patients lacking an HLA-matched or haploidentical donor and may expand HSCT access to underrepresented racial and ethnic populations.

Role of allogeneic transplantation in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: an international collaborative analysis

To determine the survival benefit of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in chronic myelomonocytic leukemias (CMML), we assembled a retrospective cohort of CMML patients 18-70 years old diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 from an international CMML dataset (n = 730) and the EBMT registry (n = 384). The prognostic impact of allo-HCT was analyzed through univariable and multivariable time-dependent models and with a multistate model, accounting for age, sex, CMML prognostic scoring system (low or intermediate-1 grouped as lower-risk, intermediate-2 or high as higher-risk) at diagnosis, and AML transformation. In univariable analysis, lower-risk CMMLs had a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 20% with allo-HCT vs 42% without allo-HCT (P < .001). In higher-risk patients, 5-year OS was 27% with allo-HCT vs 15% without allo-HCT (P = .13). With multistate models, performing allo-HCT before AML transformation reduced OS in patients with lower-risk CMML, and a survival benefit was predicted for men with higher-risk CMML. In a multivariable analysis of lower-risk patients, performing allo-HCT before transformation to AML significantly increased the risk of death within 2 years of transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 3.19; P < .001), with no significant change in long-term survival beyond this time point (HR, 0.98; P = .92). In higher-risk patients, allo-HCT significantly increased the risk of death in the first 2 years after transplant (HR 1.46; P = .01) but not beyond (HR, 0.60; P = .09). Performing allo-HCT before AML transformation decreases life expectancy in lower-risk patients but may be considered in higher-risk patients.

Post-remission measurable residual disease directs treatment choice and improves outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in CR1

Objectives

This study retrospectively investigated in which cycle measurable residual disease (MRD) is associated with prognosis in patients in first complete remission (CR1) of intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Methods

The study enrolled 235 younger patients with intermediate-risk AML. MRD was evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry after the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd chemotherapy cycles (MRD1–3, respectively).

Results

No significant association was detected after the 1st and 2nd cycles. However, the 5-year incidence of relapse was higher in the MRD3-positive group (n = 99) than in the negative group (n = 136) (48.7% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.005), while 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were lower in the MRD3-positive group than in the negative group (43.2% vs. 81.0% and 45.4% vs. 84.1%; P = 0.003 and 0.005, respectively). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation led to a lower 5-year relapse, and higher DFS and OS rates than chemotherapy in the MRD3-positive group (22.3% vs. 71.5%, 65.9% vs. 23.0%, and 67.1% vs. 23.9%; P < 0.001, 0.002, and 0.022, respectively), but did not affect the MRD-negative group.

Conclusions

MRD3 could serve as an indicator for post-remission treatment choice and help improve outcomes for intermediate-risk AML in CR1.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12185-022-03441-6.

Trends in disease indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the Asia-Pacific region: A report of the Activity Survey 2017 from APBMT

The Asia-Pacific Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (APBMT) has been conducting annual surveys on the activity of hematopoietic stem cell transplants since 2007. The APBMT Data Center collected the following data in 2017. A total of 21,504 transplants were registered from 733 transplant centers of 20 countries/regions in the Asia-Pacific (AP) region. Five countries/regions comprised 89.4% of all transplants - China (6,979), Japan (5,794), South Korea (2,626), India (2,034), and Australia (1,789). The number of centers in these five countries/regions also comprised 88.9% of all centers: Japan (373), China (123), India (66), Australia (45), and South Korea (44). The overall ratio between autologous and allogeneic transplants was 37.0% and 63.0%, respectively, but the ratios varied significantly among countries/regions. Autologous transplants have surpassed allogeneic transplants in Thailand, Australia, Vietnam, New Zealand, Singapore, and Iran. In contrast, the proportion of allogeneic transplants comprised over 70% of all transplants in Pakistan, China, and Hong Kong. These ratios were compared by the Data Center among countries/regions that performed more than 50 transplants. The proportion of related and unrelated transplants also differed among countries/regions. The number of unrelated transplants was more than related ones in Japan (2,551 vs. 1,202) and Australia (329 vs. 291), whereas more than 80% of all transplants were related transplants in Malaysia (90.9%), India (89.5%), Iran (87.2%), Vietnam (85.7%), China (80.9%), and Thailand (80.6%). All transplant activities were related transplants in Pakistan, the Philippines, Myanmar, and Nepal, and no allogeneic transplants were performed in Bangladesh and Mongolia. Regarding the indications for transplants, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was the most common disease for allogeneic transplant (4,759, 35.1% of allogeneic transplants), while plasma cell disorder (PCD) was the most common disease for autologous transplant (3,701, 27.3% of all autologous transplants). Furthermore, the number of transplants for hemoglobinopathy has steeply increased in this region compared with the rest of disease indications (677, 3.1% of all transplants). APBMT covers a broad area globally, including countries/regions with diverse disease distribution, development of HSCT programs, population, and economic power. Consistent and continuous activity surveys considering those elements in each country/region revealed the HSCT field's diverse characteristics and background factors in this region.

Consolidation in AML: Abundant opinion and much unknown

Consolidation therapy forms the backbone of post-remission therapy for AML and is uniformly accepted as an integral part of therapy designed to achieve long-term survival. The need for post-remission therapy was initially described over four decades ago and has since undergone many variations in terms of dosage, number of cycles and intensity of therapy. There is much empiricism in the current understanding of consolidation therapy and much that has not been rigorously studied. This review will consider the many aspects of consolidation therapy, focusing on the number of cycles, differences between young and older adults, first and subsequent remission as well as therapy prior to an allogeneic transplant. Emphasis will be given to differentiate strategies that are clearly evidence-based from those that have been incorporated into standard of care while bypassing the need for rigorous data-driven approaches. Finally, consideration will be given to the current ability to assess the minimal measureable residual disease and the impact that this may have on therapeutic paradigms, including superseding many of the time-honored prognostic features.

Association Between Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and First Remission, Treatment, and Outcomes

Importance

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is widely used as a therapy-stratification factor for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the association of dynamic MRD with postremission treatment (PRT) in patients with intermediate-risk AML (IR-AML) has not been well investigated.

Objective

To investigate PRT choices based on dynamic MRD in patients with IR-AML.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study examined 549 younger patients with de novo IR-AML in the South China Hematology Alliance database during the period from January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2016, including 154 who received chemotherapy, 116 who received an autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT), and 279 who received an allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT). Subgroup analyses were performed according to dynamic MRD after the first, second, and third courses of chemotherapy. The end point of the last follow-up was August 31, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed from December 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020.

Exposures

Receipt of chemotherapy, auto-SCT, or allo-SCT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end points were 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse and leukemia-free survival.

Results

Subgroup analyses were performed for 549 participants (314 male participants [57.2%]; median age, 37 years [range, 14-60 years]) according to the dynamics of MRD after 1, 2, or 3 courses of chemotherapy. Comparable cumulative incidences of relapse, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival were observed among participants who had no MRD after 1, 2, or 3 courses of chemotherapy. Participants who underwent chemotherapy and those who underwent auto-SCT had better graft-vs-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) than those who underwent allo-SCT (chemotherapy: hazard ratio [HR], 0.35 [95% CI, 0.14-0.90]; P = .03; auto-SCT: HR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.58]; P = .01). Among participants with MRD after 1 course of chemotherapy but no MRD after 2 or 3 courses, those who underwent auto-SCT and allo-SCT showed lower cumulative incidence of relapse (auto-SCT: HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.08-0.78]; P = .01; allo-SCT: HR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.02-0.24]; P < .001), better leukemia-free survival (auto-SCT: HR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.10-0.64]; P = .004; allo-SCT: HR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.09-0.46]; P < .001), and overall survival (auto-SCT: HR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.08-0.64]; P = .005; allo-SCT: HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.11-0.59]; P = .001) vs chemotherapy. In addition, auto-SCT showed better GRFS than allo-SCT (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.21-0.98]; P = .04) in this group. Among participants with MRD after 1 or 2 courses of chemotherapy but no MRD after 3 courses, allo-SCT had superior cumulative incidence of relapse (HR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.06-0.94]; P = .04) and leukemia-free survival (HR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.05-0.68]; P = .01) compared with chemotherapy, but no advantageous cumulative incidence of relapse (HR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.02-1.42]; P = .10) and leukemia-free survival (HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.05-1.08]; P = .06) compared with auto-SCT. Among participants with MRD after 3 courses of chemotherapy, allo-SCT had superior cumulative incidences of relapse, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival compared with chemotherapy (relapse: HR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.08-0.33]; P < .001; leukemia-free survival: HR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.10-0.35]; P < .001; overall survival: HR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.15-0.55]; P < .001) and auto-SCT (relapse: HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.12-0.53]; P < .001; leukemia-free survival: HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18-0.73]; P = .004; overall survival: HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.26-0.94]; P = .04). Among participants with recurrent MRD, allo-SCT was also associated with advantageous cumulative incidence of relapse, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival compared with chemotherapy (relapse: HR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.04-0.33]; P < .001; leukemia-free survival: HR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.10-0.56]; P = .001; overall survival: HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.75]; P = .01) and auto-SCT (relapse: HR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.09-0.81]; P = .02; leukemia-free survival: HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12-0.76]; P = .01; overall survival: HR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.10-0.70]; P = .007).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that clinical decisions based on dynamic MRD might be associated with improved therapy stratification and optimized PRT for patients with IR-AML. Prospective multicenter trials are needed to further validate these findings.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Evidence-Based Review from the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

The role of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the management of newly diagnosed adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is reviewed and critically evaluated in this evidence-based review. An AML expert panel, consisting of both transplant and nontransplant experts, was invited to develop clinically relevant frequently asked questions covering disease- and HCT-related topics. A systematic literature review was conducted to generate core recommendations that were graded based on the quality and strength of underlying evidence based on the standardized criteria established by the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Steering Committee for evidence-based reviews. Allogeneic HCT offers a survival benefit in patients with intermediate- and high-risk AML and is currently a part of standard clinical care. We recommend the preferential use of myeloablative conditioning in eligible patients. A haploidentical related donor marrow graft is preferred over a cord blood unit in the absence of a fully HLA-matched donor. The evolving role of allogeneic HCT in the context of measurable residual disease monitoring and recent therapeutic advances in AML with regards to maintenance therapy after HCT are also discussed.

Comparison of post-remission strategies in acute myeloid leukemia: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus consolidation chemotherapy

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (auto-HSCT) has become a therapeutic option for first-line consolidation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients with favorable and intermediate risk features. A total of 101 AML patients in first complete remission, who were not eligible for allogeneic HSCT, were randomized to receive intensive cytarabine-based chemotherapy or to undergo auto-HSCT. The probability of LFS was significantly better in auto-HSCT recipients compared to chemotherapy arm (43% vs 4.8%, p=0.008). At the end of 915 (30-4470) days of followup, the probability of overall survival was better in auto-HSCT group compared to chemotherapy, without statistical significance (79.2% vs 38.8%, p=0.054). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant predictive impact of cytogenetic risk status on OS (p=0.002, HR: 2.824, 95% CI: 1.445-5.521). Auto-HSCT is considered as an effective consolidation approach in favorable and intermadiate risk AML patients.

[Autologous versus unrelated donor stem cell transplantation for adults with primary acute myeloid leukemia in first remission]

Objective: To compare differences of autologous and unrelated donor stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT) for adults with primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR(1)) from a single center and to investigate the appropriate patients for the 2 types of transplant. Methods: In this retrospective investigation, we studied adults with primary AML who received auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT from March 2008 to November 2018. Overall survival (OS) , leukemia-free survival (LFS) , relapse, transplant-related mortality (TRM) , and hematopoietic reconstitution were compared along with the prognostic value of cytogenetics. Results: A total of 147 adult patients were enrolled in this study (n=87 for auto-HSCT and n=60 for URD-HSCT) . Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. The accumulative neutrophil engraftment rate at +30 days was not statistically different between the 2 groups[92.6% (95% CI 86.9%-98.3%) vs 98.3% (95% CI 95.0%-100.0%) , P=0.270], whereas the accumulative platelet engraftment rate at +60 days was significantly lower in the auto-HSCT group[83.6% (95% CI 75.8%-91.4%) vs 93.3% (95% CI 87.0%-99.6%) , P<0.001]. In patients undergoing URD-HSCT, the accumulative incidences of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD were 56.7% (95% CI 43.0%-68.2%) and 16.7% (95% CI 8.5%-27.2%) , and the incidences of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and extensive cGVHD were 33.3% (95% CI 21.7%-45.4%) and 15.0% (95% CI 7.3%-25.2%) , respectively. After a median follow-up of 53.8 (0.8-127.8) months, patients in the 2 groups demonstrated comparable OS and LFS at 5 years after transplant[71.7% (95% CI 61.7%-81.7%) vs 67.8% (95% CI 55.8%-79.8%) , P=0.556; 64.6% (95% CI 54.4%-74.8%) vs 68.1% (95% CI 56.3%-79.9%) , P=0.642]. Patients in the auto-HSCT group showed significantly higher incidence of relapse at 5 years after transplant[31.9% (95% CI 22.2%-42.1%) vs 15.1% (95% CI 7.4%-25.6%) , P=0.015] and significantly lower incidence of TRM[3.4% (95% CI 0.9%-8.9%) vs 16.7% (95% CI 8.5%-27.2%) , P=0.006] compared with the URD group. HLA mismatching had no effects on the incidences of hematopoietic reconstitution, GVHD, OS, LFS, relapse, and TRM. Patients of cytogenetically favorable and intermediate risk demonstrated comparable OS and LFS after auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT, while patients of poor risk had significantly higher relapse and lower LFS after auto-HSCT. Conclusions: In this study, adults with primary AML in CR(1) demonstrated relatively higher relapse but lower TRM after auto-HSCT, resulting in comparable survival to that of URD-HSCT. In the absence of matched sibling donors, patients of cytogenetically poor risk should receive URD-HSCT in order to achieve lower relapse and better survival.

Risk stratification using FLT3 and NPM1 in acute myeloid leukemia patients autografted in first complete remission

FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutation refine prognostic stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with intermediate-risk cytogenetics. However, data on their role in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (Auto-SCT) as post-remission therapy (PRT) are limited. We therefore sought to retrospectively evaluate the role of FLT3-ITD and NPM1 in a cohort of AML patients (n = 405) with intermediate-risk cytogenetics, autografted in first complete remission (CR1). Patients were transplanted between 2000 and 2014 and reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was the primary outcome. Median follow-up was 5.5 years. FLT3-ITD^neg/NPM1^WT was the leading molecular subtype (50%), followed by FLT3-ITD^neg/NPM1^mut (30%). In the univariate analysis, molecular subtype was associated with LFS, overall survival (OS), and relapse incidence (RI) (p < 0.001); 5-year LFS: FLT3-ITD^neg/NPM1^mut 62%, FLT3-ITD^pos/NPM1^mut 38%, FLT3-ITD^neg/NPM1^WT 32%, and FLT3-ITD^pos/NPM1^WT 21%. At 5 years, OS and RI in the FLT3-ITD^neg/NPM1^mut subtype were 74% and 35%, respectively. The corresponding OS and RI in other subtypes were below 48% and over 57%. In a Cox multivariable model, molecular subtype was the strongest predictor of LFS, OS, and relapse. In conclusion, AML patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and FLT3-ITD^neg/NPM1^mut experience favorable outcomes when autografted in CR1, suggesting that Auto-SCT is a valid PRT option.

Pre-transplant MRD negativity predicts favorable outcomes of CAR-T therapy followed by haploidentical HSCT for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a multi-center retrospective study

Background

Consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a controversial option for patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia after chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy. We performed a multicenter retrospective study to assess whether patients can benefit from haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after CAR-T therapy.

Methods

A total of 122 patients after CAR-T therapy were enrolled, including 67 patients without subsequent transplantation (non-transplant group) and 55 patients with subsequent haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (transplant group). Long-term outcome was assessed, as was its association with baseline patient characteristics.

Results

Compared with the non-transplant group, transplantation recipients had a higher 2-year overall survival (OS; 77.0% versus 36.4%; P < 0.001) and leukemia-free survival (LFS; 65.6% versus 32.8%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity at transplantation is an independent factor associated with poor LFS (P = 0.005), OS (P = 0.035), and high cumulative incidence rate of relapse (P = 0.045). Pre-transplant MRD-negative recipients (MRD− group) had a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (17.3%) than those in the non-transplant group (67.2%; P < 0.001) and pre-transplant MRD-positive recipients (MRD+ group) (65.8%; P = 0.006). The cumulative incidence of relapse in MRD+ and non-transplant groups did not differ significantly (P = 0.139). The 2-year LFS in the non-transplant, MRD+, and MRD− groups was 32.8%, 27.6%, and 76.1%, respectively. The MRD− group had a higher LFS than the non-transplantation group (P < 0.001) and MRD+ group (P = 0.007), whereas the LFS in the MRD+ and non-transplant groups did not differ significantly (P = 0.305). The 2-year OS of the MRD− group was higher than that of the non-transplant group (83.3% versus 36.4%; P < 0.001) but did not differ from that of the MRD+ group (83.3% versus 62.7%; P = 0.069). The OS in the non-transplant and MRD+ groups did not differ significantly (P = 0.231).

Conclusion

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with pre-transplant MRD negativity after CAR-T therapy could greatly improve LFS and OS in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Trial registration

The study was registered in the Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR1900023957).

Outcomes of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Compared With Chemotherapy Consolidation Alone for Non-High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission in a Minority-Rich Inner-City Cohort With Limited Access to Allografts

INTRODUCTION

In the United States, autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) has fallen out of favor over chemotherapy consolidation for non-high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) when allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is unfeasible, which is common in racial minorities because of donor registry under-representation and socioeconomic challenges. We compared autoHCT consolidation outcomes with chemotherapy alone in a minority-rich cohort in the Bronx.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified adults with favorable or intermediate cytogenetic risk AML in first complete remission after induction at Montefiore Medical Center from 1999 to 2015, and analyzed 81 patients who received consolidation with ≥2 cycles of chemotherapy, of whom 28 received autoHCT.

RESULTS

The cohort predominantly consisted of ethnic/racial minorities (69%). Age, sex, race, presenting white cell count, and cytogenetic risk were similar between groups. The autoHCT group had longer relapse-free (RFS; 43 vs. 11 months; P = .003) and overall (OS) survival (not reached vs. 36 months; P = .043). Adjusted multivariable analysis showed significant benefit of autoHCT over chemotherapy alone for RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.75; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.95; P = .027).

CONCLUSION

In this inner-city non-high-risk AML cohort, autoHCT provided OS and RFS benefit compared with chemotherapy alone. AutoHCT might constitute a valuable option for ethnic/racial minorities affected by significant barriers to alloHCT, whereas integration of measurable residual disease can help select patients more likely to benefit.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

The clinical outcomes of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) have improved over time. Indeed, numerous studies have demonstrated that ASCT is associated with a lower relapse rate and acceptable nonrelapse mortality compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with AML. In addition, ASCT is also associated with comparable overall survival outcomes to those of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in some patients with AML. To date, age, cytogenetic and molecular risk stratification, and minimal residual disease (MRD) status have been shown to be closely related to clinical outcomes following ASCT. ASCT is recommended for patients with favorable-risk and intermediate-risk AML in first complete remission and patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia in second complete remission for whom a matched sibling donor is not available. MRD status pre-ASCT is the most important factor to consider when determining whether a patient is eligible for ASCT and can effectively predict clinical outcomes after ASCT. Advanced age is not an absolute contradiction for ASCT. In this review, we describe the literature and clinical trials evaluating the outcomes of ASCT in patients with AML and discuss the indications for ASCT therapy. Because the greatest concern in ASCT recipients is early relapse, important factors that should be monitored before ASCT and future perspectives in this area are also presented.

Prophylaxis and treatment of relapse after haploidentical stem cell transplantation: What is known vs unknown?

In recent years, the human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) approach is an attractive option for patients who require transplantation, but relapse is still the main reason that affects the curative effect of transplantation. Some studies have shown that haplo-SCT is superior to sibling or unrelated matching donor transplantation in preventing leukemia relapse after transplantation. In this review, we discussed the known and unknown aspects of relapse post haplo-SCT. Encouragingly, haplo-SCT experienced lower or similar incidence of relapse. But there is currently a lack of multicenter prospective studies evaluating the outcomes of different haplo-SCT strategies. The combination of common prophylactic strategies and pre-emptive interventions might help prevent relapse after transplantation. Novel methods such as target drugs therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy may be useful in treatment of relapse.

Superior outcome of patients with favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia using consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), intensifying anti-leukemic effects without significant treatment-related mortality (TRM), is particularly appealing in AML with favorable genetic/molecular profile. This study retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of post-remission treatment in consecutive favorable-risk AML patients. Sixty-six patients were included: 32 had mutated NPM1/wild-type FLT-ITD, 16 had t(8:21) and 18 - inv(16). Forty patients received chemotherapy alone, 26 underwent ASCT upfront. In time-dependent analysis, the ASCT group demonstrated higher relapse-free (RFS) (p = .001) and overall survivals (OS) (p = .0007). The 1-year RFS and OS were 44.2% vs 88% and 71% vs 96% for chemotherapy and ASCT, respectively. The corresponding TRM was 4/40 (10.0%) and 0/26 (0%), with relapse rates of 70.0% and 19.2% (p = .0002). In multivariate analysis, ASCT was associated with superior OS and RFS. In conclusion, ASCT offers significantly superior RFS and OS in favorable-risk AML in first complete remission. These data support the recent resurgence of interest in ASCT for AML.

Mechanisms of drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a kind of malignant hematopoietic system disease characterized by abnormal proliferation, poor cell differentiation, and infiltration of bone marrow, peripheral blood, or other tissues. To date, the first-line treatment of AML is still based on daunorubicin and cytosine arabinoside or idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside regimen. However, the complete remission rate of AML is still not optimistic, especially in elderly patients, and the recurrence rate after complete remission is still high. The resistance of leukemia cells to chemotherapy drugs becomes the main obstacle in the treatment of AML. At present, the research on the mechanisms of drug resistance in AML is very active. This article will elaborate on the main mechanisms of drug resistance currently being studied, including drug resistance-related proteins and enzymes, gene alterations, micro RNAs, and signal pathways.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Viable Postremission Therapy for Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission in the Absence of a Matched Identical Sibling: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The preferred type of postremission therapy (PRT) for intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) is a subject of continued debate. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is regarded as a curative strategy for AML, the efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) for patients without a matched sibling donor (MSD) has remained controversial.

METHODS

To compare survival outcomes after alloSCT versus autoSCT for patients with intermediate-risk AML in CR1, we performed a meta-analysis of 11 clinical studies. The outcomes included relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), relapse rate (RR), and treatment-related mortality (TRM).

RESULTS

Compared with autoSCT, alloSCT showed better RFS, OS, and RR benefits, but higher TRM. Subgroup analysis based on donor category (MSD and matched unrelated donor [MUD]) of alloSCT showed alloSCT from MSD rather than from MUD had better OS benefits compared to autoSCT. For fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD) wild-type patients, alloSCT and autoSCT had comparable RFS and OS outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that, in the absence of an available MSD, autoSCT remains a viable PRT alternative for intermediate-risk AML in CR1, especially for FLT3-ITD wild-type patients.

Revisiting autologous transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has been evaluated as a consolidation treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the 1980s and 1990s. These prospective studies from large trials compared auto-HCT with chemotherapy. A comparison was made also with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). These studies reported a lower relapse rate with auto-HCT compared with chemotherapy, but without impact on the overall survival. A high transplant-related mortality in that era confounded the relevance of these data.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several prospective studies and a plethora of retrospective registry data have confirmed the potent antileukemic therapy of auto-HCT compared with chemotherapy and, in some instances, have even challenged the presumed superiority of allo-HCT as the definitive therapy for certain patients with AML.

SUMMARY

The aggregate of recent data, prospective and retrospective, strongly suggests an important role for auto-HCT, at least as the most potent nonimmunologic antileukemia therapy. The transplant-related mortality in 2017 is close to that expected from standard consolidation therapy leading to the conclusion that the role of auto-HCT needs to be rigorously revisited, preferably in prospective studies, to establish its precise role in the current era.

Autologous Transplantation for Older Adults with AML

While the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are above the age of 65 years at diagnosis, the outcome of older AML patients remains disappointing. Even if standard intensive chemotherapy induces morphologic complete remission (CR1), relapses in older AML patients are common leading to poor long-term survival outcomes. Since autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) offers distinct anti-leukemic effectiveness while avoiding graft-versus-host disease associated with allogeneic transplantation, it represents an option for consolidation treatment in selected older AML patients. However, prospective studies in older AML patients assessing the benefit of autologous HCT compared to chemotherapy consolidation or allogeneic transplantation are lacking. Consequently, clinicians face the dilemma that there is considerable ambiguity on the most appropriate consolidation treatment for older AML patients in CR1. This review highlights the possible role of autologous HCT for consolidation in older AML patients reaching CR1 after induction treatment.

Outcomes of Intermediate Risk Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Chemotherapy Consolidation: A Retrospective, Propensity-score Adjusted Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Optimal post-remission therapy (PRT) for intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia remains an area of ongoing research. We aimed to retrospectively compare outcomes following autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) with allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) and consolidation chemotherapy (CMT) in patients with intermediate-risk karyotype AML in first complete remission.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) using propensity score (PS)-adjusted analysis of patients receiving PRT with autoSCT, matched sibling (MSD) alloSCT, unrelated/mismatch (UD/MM) alloSCT, and CMT. We included patients diagnosed between 1984 and 2003 (period of autoSCT at our center) in CR1 following induction CMT and received at least 2 consolidative cycles.

RESULTS

We identified 190 patients (62 MSD-alloSCT, 18 UD/MM-alloSCT, 30 autoSCT, and 80 CMT). Baseline characteristics were used for PS calculation and were well-balanced after weight adjustment. The median follow-up for patients surviving beyond 1 year was 8.7 years. We excluded 55 patients based on PS calculation. Adjusted multivariate hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-value for OS, considering CMT as reference, were: MSD-alloSCT (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8; P = .009), UD/MM-alloSCT (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.6-3.9; P = .363), and autoSCT (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-3.1; P = .666), respectively. Adjusted multivariate HR, 95% CI and P-value for LFS were MSD-alloSCT (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P < .001), UD/MM-alloSCT (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.4-2.7; P = .854), and autoSCT (HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3-2.2; P = .697), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with intermediate risk-karyotype acute myeloid leukemia who underwent MSD-alloSCT in first complete remission had the best outcomes. There were no survival differences between autoSCT, UD/MM-alloSCT, and CMT. Further study incorporating molecular changes and minimal residual disease status is warranted to select appropriate patients for autoSCT.

Optimizing the pretransplant regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in acute myelogenous leukemia: Better outcomes with busulfan and melphalan compared with busulfan and cyclophosphamide in high risk patients autografted in first complete remission: A study from the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT

Autologous stem cell transplantation remains a clinical option to consolidate some adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). In a small cohort of patients, we have previously shown better outcomes following Busulfan and Melphalan (BUMEL) over Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide (BUCY). To identify the subpopulations that might get the highest benefit with BUMEL, we designed a larger study. All adult patients with primary AML and available cytogenetics, autografted from January 2000 to December 2016 in CR1, were included: 1137 patients received BUCY and 512 BUMEL. All factors differing in distribution between the 2 conditioning groups were introduced in multivariate analyzes. In a primary analysis, we found an interaction between conditioning and the poor risk group defined as poor cytogenetics and/or presence of the FLT3-ITD mutation. During analysis of the poor risk group, 176 patients received BUCY and 62 BUMEL. BUMEL was associated with a lower RI at 5 years (53% versus 69%, HR: 0.52, P = .002), a better Leukaemia-free survival (LFS) (42% versus 25%, HR: 0.54, P = .002) and a better OS (54% versus 36%, HR: 0.61, P = .02). During analysis of the non poor risk group, 961 patients received BUCY and 450 BUMEL. At 5 years, the RI was 50% and 47%, the LFS 45% and 48% and the OS 56% and 60% respectively, with no significant difference. We conclude that BUMEL is the preferable conditioning regimen for the poor risk leukemic patients, while in AML patients without poor risk cytogenetics or FLT3 both conditioning regimens are valid.

Venetoclax and low-dose cytarabine induced complete remission in a patient with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: a case report

Conventional combination therapies have not resulted in considerable progress in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Elderly patients with AML and poor risk factors have grave prognosis. Midostaurin has been recently approved for the treatment of FLT-3-mutated AML. Venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphoid leukemia. Clinical trials on applying venetoclax in combination with cytarabine and other agents to treat various hematological malignancies are currently underway. Here, we present a case of a male patient with poor performance status and who developed AML following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for high-risk myelodysplasia. The patient with high risk AML achieved complete response to the combined treatment regimen of low-dose cytarabine and venetoclax. Furthermore, we reviewed current clinical trials on the use of venetoclax for hematological malignancies.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) yields a high rate of curability for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), it is also associated with transplant-related morbidity and mortality (TRM). The risk and severity of TRM increase with the use of an alternative donor graft in the absence of an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD). With the declining birthrate and aging of the population, the numbers of patients with an MSD are decreasing, and alternative donor transplants, including the post-transplant cyclophosphamide method using haplo-identical donors, are increasing. Autologous (auto)-HSCT, which enables the intensification of chemotherapy, has the advantage of high availability of a transplant graft, and is associated with a lower TRM, but these benefits may be offset by a higher rate of relapse due to the lack of a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Although allo-HSCT remains the first-line treatment for poor and very-poor-risk patients, auto-HSCT is again gaining increased attention. It has also recently been suggested that cord blood grafts may induce a stronger GVL effect than other grafts; as such, the positioning of cord blood transplantation should also be reconsidered for AML patients.

Unrelated matched versus autologous transplantation in adult patients with good and intermediate risk acute myelogenous leukemia in first molecular remission

Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia have a better outcome if reaching molecular remission. We compared the outcome of 373 patients autografted and 335 patients allografted with a 10/10 compatible unrelated donor in first molecular remission. Patients were stratified using the ELN European Leukemia Net classification. ELN favorable group: (234 auto and 70 unrelated transplants). By univariate analysis, in the auto group, the Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) was lower (3.7% versus 19%; P < 10^-4 ), Relapse Incidence (RI) higher (29% versus 17%, P < 10^-4 ), Leukemia Free Survival (LFS) identical (67% versus 64%) and Overall Survival (OS) better than in the allogeneic group (83% versus 62%; P = .008). By multivariate analysis, autologous transplantation was associated with a lower NRM (HR: 4, P = .01) and a better OS (HR: 2.08, P = .04). ELN intermediate group 1: (87 autologous and 172 unrelated transplants). By univariate analysis, in the auto group, NRM was lower (2.5% versus 11.8%; P = .03), RI higher (59% versus 18%, P < 10^-6 ), LFS lower (39% versus 70%; P < 10^-6 ) and OS lower than in the unrelated donor group (61% versus 74%; P = .005). By multivariate analysis, unrelated donor was superior to autologous transplantation for LFS (HR: 0.36, P < 10^-5) and OS (HR: 0.53, P = .01). ELN intermediate group 2: (52 autologous and 93 unrelated donors). The outcome was identical. We conclude that good risk patients get higher benefit from autologous transplantation. Intermediate risk 2 patients have the same outcome and Intermediate risk 1 patients get higher benefit from unrelated donor transplants.

Comparison of Autologous and Unrelated Transplants for Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) is a postremission treatment that offers a potential cure for adults with cytogenetically normal (CN) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). The best alternative in the absence of an MSD remains unclear, however. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the outcomes of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT; n = 177) and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 173) in adult patients with CN-AML/CR1. Both the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.97; P = .53) and propensity score models (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.80 to 2.43; P = .24) indicated that the leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate of auto-PBSCT was not significantly different from that of MUD-BMT. These results suggest that in the absence of an available MSD, auto-PBSCT remains a viable alternative as postremission therapy in patients with CN-AML/CR1.

Molecular and genetic alterations associated with therapy resistance and relapse of acute myeloid leukemia

Background

The majority of individuals with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) respond to initial chemotherapy and achieve a complete remission, yet only a minority experience long-term survival because a large proportion of patients eventually relapse with therapy-resistant disease. Relapse therefore represents a central problem in the treatment of AML. Despite this, and in contrast to the extensive knowledge about the molecular events underlying the process of leukemogenesis, information about the mechanisms leading to therapy resistance and relapse is still limited.

Purpose and content of review

Recently, a number of studies have aimed to fill this gap and provided valuable information about the clonal composition and evolution of leukemic cell populations during the course of disease, and about genetic, epigenetic, and gene expression changes associated with relapse. In this review, these studies are summarized and discussed, and the data reported in them are compiled in order to provide a resource for the identification of molecular aberrations recurrently acquired at, and thus potentially contributing to, disease recurrence and the associated therapy resistance. This survey indeed uncovered genetic aberrations with known associations with therapy resistance that were newly gained at relapse in a subset of patients. Furthermore, the expression of a number of protein coding and microRNA genes was reported to change between diagnosis and relapse in a statistically significant manner.

Conclusions

Together, these findings foster the expectation that future studies on larger and more homogeneous patient cohorts will uncover pathways that are robustly associated with relapse, thus representing potential targets for rationally designed therapies that may improve the treatment of patients with relapsed AML, or even facilitate the prevention of relapse in the first place.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-017-0416-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and 17p abnormalities in first complete remission: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with 17p abnormalities (abn(17p)) carries a very poor prognosis due to high refractoriness to conventional chemotherapy, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) appears as the only potential curative option.

METHODS

To address outcomes after allo-SCT in patients with abn(17p), we retrospectively analysed de novo or secondary AML undergoing SCT between 2000 and 2013 from the EBMT registry.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine patients with confirmed abn(17p) have been selected. At the time of transplant, one hundred twenty-five were in first remission (CR1). Median age was 54 years old. Abn(17p) was associated with a monosomal karyotype in 83% of patients, complex karyotype in 91%, monosomy 5 or 5q deletion (-5/5q-) in 55%, monosomy 7 (-7) in 39% and both -5/5q and -7 in 27%. Seventy-three patients (59%) had a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS) were 28 and 24%, respectively. The 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 15%, and 2-year relapse incidence (RI) was 61%. The cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was 24% and that of chronic GvHD was 21%. In multivariate analysis, the presence of a -5/5q- in addition to abn(17p) was significantly and independently associated with worse OS, LFS and higher RI. Age and donor types did not correlate with outcome. Conditioning intensity was not statistically associated with OS, LFS and NRM when adjusted for patients' age.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the dismal prognosis reported for AML patients harbouring abn(17p) undergoing conventional chemotherapy, allogeneic SCT provides responses in about 25% of those patients transplanted in CR1.