Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) can predict the therapeutic outcomes of immuno-neoadjuvant therapy in NSCLC patients

The intersection of homologous recombination (HR) and mismatch repair (MMR) pathways in DNA repair-defective tumors

Homologous recombination (HR) and mismatch repair (MMR) defects are driver mutational imprints and actionable biomarkers in DNA repair-defective tumors. Although usually thought as mutually exclusive pathways, recent preclinical and clinical research provide preliminary evidence of a functional crosslink and crosstalk between HRR and MMR. Shared core proteins are identified as key players in both pathways, broadening the concept of DNA repair mechanism exclusivity in specific tumor types. These observations may result in unexplored forms of synthetic lethality or hypermutable tumor phenotypes, potentially impacting the cancer risk management, and considerably expanding in the future the therapeutic window for DNA repair-defective tumors.

Homologous recombination deficiency status predicts response to immunotherapy-based treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a biomarker that predicts response to ovarian cancer treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or breast cancer treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. However, there are few studies on the prognosis of lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy using HRD as a biomarker.

METHODS

We studied the relationship between HRD status and the effectiveness of first-line ICI-based therapy in EGFR/ALK wild-type metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) patients.

RESULTS

This study included 22 treatment naïve NSCLC patients. The HRD score ranged from -26.37 to 92.34, with an average of 24.57. Based on analysis of the progression-free survival (PFS) data from the included NSCLC patients, threshold traversal was carried out. HRD (+) was defined as an HRD score of 31 or higher. Kaplan-Meier PFS survival analysis showed prolonged median PFS (mPFS) in NSCLC patients with HRD (+) versus HRD (-) (N/A vs. 7.0 ms, log-rank p = 0.029; HR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.96, likelihood-ratio p = 0.03). In patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and HRD score ≥31 (co-status high), the mPFS was temporarily not reached during the follow-up period. In patients with PD-L1 TPS <1% and HRD score <31, the mPFS was 3 ms. Cox regression analysis showed that the hazard ratio of the co-status was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.04-0.54), which was a good prognostic factor, and the prognostic effect of co-status was better than that of HRD score alone.

CONCLUSION

The HRD status can be identified as an independent significance in NSCLC patients treated with first-line ICI-based therapy.

XRCC2 driven homologous recombination subtypes and therapeutic targeting in lung adenocarcinoma metastasis

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a leading cause of cancer mortality, with many patients facing poor prognosis, particularly those with metastatic or drug-resistant tumors. Homologous recombination genes (HRGs) are crucial in tumor progression and therapy resistance, but their clinical significance in LUAD is not well understood. In this study, we systematically characterize key HRGs in LUAD patients, identifying two distinct HR subtypes associated with different outcomes and biological functions. We establish a 5-gene scoring system (XRCC2, RAD51, BRCA1, FANCA, and CHEK1) that reliably predicts patient outcomes and immunotherapy responses in LUAD. Bioinformatics analysis and clinical validation highlight XRCC2 as a crucial biomarker in LUAD. Functional investigations through in vivo and in vitro experiments reveal the role of XRCC2 in promoting lung cancer migration and invasion. Mechanistically, XRCC2 stabilizes vimentin (VIM) protein expression through deubiquitylation. We predict c-MYC as a potential regulator of XRCC2 and demonstrate that inhibiting c-MYC with compound 10058-F4 reduces XRCC2 and VIM expression. Preclinical studies show the synergistic inhibition of metastasis in vivo when combining 10058-F4 with doxorubicin (Dox). Our findings present a potential personalized predictive tool for LUAD prognosis, identifying XRCC2 as a critical biomarker. The c-Myc-XRCC2-VIM axis emerges as a promising therapeutic target for overcoming lung metastasis. This study provides valuable insights into LUAD, proposing a prognostic tool for further clinical validation and unveiling a potential therapeutic strategy for combating lung metastasis by targeting c-Myc-XRCC2-VIM.

Clinical and molecular significance of homologous recombination deficiency positive non-small cell lung cancer in Chinese population: An integrated genomic and transcriptional analysis

Objective

The clinical significance of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and prostate cancer has been established, but the value of HRD in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully investigated. This study aimed to systematically analyze the HRD status of untreated NSCLC and its relationship with patient prognosis to further guide clinical care.

Methods

A total of 355 treatment-naïve NSCLC patients were retrospectively enrolled. HRD status was assessed using the AmoyDx Genomic Scar Score (GSS), with a score of ≥50 considered HRD-positive. Genomic, transcriptomic, tumor microenvironmental characteristics and prognosis between HRD-positive and HRD-negative patients were analyzed.

Results

Of the patients, 25.1% (89/355) were HRD-positive. Compared to HRD-negative patients, HRD-positive patients had more somatic pathogenic homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations, higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) (P<0.001), and fewer driver gene mutations (P<0.001). Furthermore, HRD-positive NSCLC had more amplifications in PI3K pathway and cell cycle genes, MET and MYC in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutant NSCLC, and more PIK3CA and AURKA in EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC. HRD-positive NSCLC displayed higher tumor proliferation and immunosuppression activity. HRD-negative NSCLC showed activated signatures of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-II, interferon (IFN)-γ and effector memory CD8+ T cells. HRD-positive patients had a worse prognosis and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) to targeted therapy (first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs) (P=0.042). Additionally, HRD-positive, EGFR/ALK wild-type patients showed a numerically lower response to platinum-free immunotherapy regimens.

Conclusions

Unique genomic and transcriptional characteristics were found in HRD-positive NSCLC. Poor prognosis and poor response to EGFR-TKIs and immunotherapy were observed in HRD-positive NSCLC. This study highlights potential actionable alterations in HRD-positive NSCLC, suggesting possible combinational therapeutic strategies for these patients.

DNA double-strand break repair capacity and its pathway gene variants predict the risk and prognosis of lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the association between DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair capacity, variations in DSBs-related genes, and the occurrence and prognosis of lung cancer in the Chinese population.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected from 98 lung cancer patients and 60 healthy individuals. The individual DSBs repair capacity was assessed by measuring changes in γ-H2AX levels after treatment with etoposide. Exonic sequencing of 45 DSBs-related genes was performed on PBMC DNA. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between lung cancer risk and DSBs repair capacity as well as germlines gene variations. Survival analysis employed the Cox proportional hazards regression model, Kaplan-Meier method, and Log-rank test.

RESULTS

Lower DSBs repair capacity predicted an increased risk of developing lung cancer (OR = 0.94, 95 %CI = 0.917-0.964, P＜0.001). Among lung cancer patients, higher DSBs repair capacity was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) during first-line treatment (HR = 1.80, 95 %CI = 1.10-3.00, P = 0.031). Patients with BRCA1 mutations had shorter overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.92, 95 %CI = 1.12-3.28, P = 0.018). Patients with FOXO3 mutations had shorter PFS (HR = 4.23, 95 %CI = 1.44-12.36, P = 0.009). Analysis of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) indicated that LIG4 mutations were associated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.90, 95 %CI = 1.00-8.10, P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that assessing DSBs repair capacity holds promise for predicting both lung cancer risk and prognosis in the Chinese population. Further large-scale studies and functional validation of specific gene mutations related to double-strand breaks are necessary for confirmation.

Case report: Robust response to sintilimab in advanced distal cholangiocarcinoma with PD-L1 expression and DNA damage repair

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly heterogeneous tumor that occurs in the bile duct epithelium; adenosquamous carcinoma is a rare pathological subtype of CCA. The clinical treatment of patients with metastatic distal CCA poses significant challenges. We report a 53-year-old female diagnosed with a stage III adenosquamous carcinomas of distal CCA. Metastasis occurred 4 months postoperatively and she was diagnosed with stage IV disease. The patient was treated with Gemcitabine + Oxaliplatin (GEMOX) and Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin (CAPEOX), followed by sintilimab monotherapy. After two cycles of treatment, the patient achieved partial response (PR) and the lesion continued to shrink. After 37 months of follow-up, the patient's liver metastasis had almost completely disappeared, and complete response (CR) was achieved. Moreover, she had more than 46 months of disease progression-free survival (PFS). Immunohistochemical testing showed high expression of PD-L1, and next-generation sequencing revealed the presence of mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the successful treatment of metastatic distal adenosquamous CCA with sintilimab alone. Remarkably, patients of CCA with high PD-L1 expression and DDR pathway gene mutations may benefit from sintilimab treatment.

Identification of different subtypes of ovarian cancer and construction of prognostic models based on glutamine-metabolism associated genes

Ovarian cancer (OC) is common malignant tumor of female reproductive system. Glutamine metabolism-related genes (GMRGs) play a key role in ovarian cancer. Here, available database-- The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were applied in our research. OC samples from TCGA were divided into different clusters based on Cox analysis, which filtering GMRGs with survival information. Then, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between these clusters were intersected with DEGs between normal ovary samples and OC samples, and GMRGs in order to obtain GMRGs-related DEGs. Next, a risk model of OC was constructed and enrichment analysis of risk model was performed based on hallmark gene set. Besides, the immune cells ratio in OC samples were detected via Cell type Identification By Estimating Relative Subsets Of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT). Finally, we explored a series of potential biomarkers of OC. In this research, 9 GMRGs-related DEGs were obtained. GMRGs-related DEGs were enriched to canonical Wnt signaling pathway.NKD2, C2orf88, and KLHDC8A, which were significantly associated with prognosis, were retained for risk model construction. Based on the risk model, 18 hallmark pathways with significant difference were enriched. Fifteen types of immune cells (such as iDC, NK CD56dim cells, and neutrophils) enjoying significant difference between these 2 risk groups (high risk group vs. low risk group) were detected, which indicates possible disparate TME in different metabolic subtypes of ovarian cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal cancer

As the major malignant tumors in the chest, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and esophageal cancer (EC) bring huge health burden to human beings worldwide. Currently, surgery is still the mainstay for comprehensive treatment for NSCLC and EC, but the prognosis is still poor as the results of cancer recurrence and distant metastasis. Neoadjuvant therapy refers to a single or combined treatment before surgery, aiming to improve the therapeutic effects of the traditional therapies. Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes and effects of neoadjuvant therapy are still controversial due to its apparent advantages and disadvantages, and different patients may respond differentially to the same scheme of neoadjuvant therapy, which makes it urgent and necessary to develop personalized scheme of neoadjuvant therapy for different individuals. Therefore, this review summarizes the novel schemes and strategies of neoadjuvant therapy, which may help to significantly improve of life quality of patients suffering from chest-related malignancies.

[Progress on Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

In recent years, there has been a consensus regarding the enhancement of prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through the utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Numerous clinical studies have also demonstrated the substantial value of immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC patients. Nevertheless, there remain controversies surrounding the exploration of immune combination strategies, treatment-related side effects, prognostic biomarkers, as well as other issues in the neoadjuvant therapy setting. Consequently, this article presents a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC, stimulating fresh perspectives and delving into its merits and challenges in clinical application.
.

Efficacy and safety of second-line therapy by S-1 combined with sintilimab and anlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis: a single-arm, phase II clinical trial

Background

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma carries a grim prognosis, and there are few recognized effective second-line treatment strategies. We attempted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of S-1, sintilimab, and anlotinib as a second-line treatment in pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis.

Methods

Pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastases were recruited. S-1 was administered orally at 25 mg/m2 bid, anlotinib was administered orally at 12 mg qd from day 1 to day 14, and sintilimab was administered intravenously at 200 mg on day 1. This method was repeated every 21 days, and the therapeutic effect was evaluated every 3 cycles. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR).

Results

Overall, 23 patients were enrolled in this study of whom 19 patients had objective efficacy evaluation. The ORR was 10.5% (95% CI 0.4%-25.7%) in the evaluable population. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.53 (95% CI 2.50-7.50) months, and the overall survival (mOS) was 8.53 (95% CI 4.97-14.20) months. Grade 3 adverse events were 26.1%, and no grade 4 or above adverse events occurred. High-throughput sequencing was performed on the tumor tissues of 16 patients; patients with HRD-H (n = 10) had shorter PFS than those with HRD-L (n = 6) (2.43 vs. 5.45 months; P = 0.043), but there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (4.43 vs. 9.35 months; P = 0.11).

Conclusions

This study suggests the advantage of S-1 combined with sintilimab and anlotinib in extending OS as a second-line therapy in pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2000030659.

Identification of the Roles of Coagulation-related Signature and its Key Factor RABIF in Hepatoma Cell Malignancy

BACKGROUND

Hepatoma is a high morbidity and mortality cancer, and coagulation is a potential oncogenic mechanism for hepatoma development.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to reveal the role of coagulation in hepatoma.

METHODS

We applied the LASSO to construct a coagulation-related risk score (CRS) and a clinical nomogram with independent validation. The heterogeneity of various aspects, including functional enrichment, SNV, CN, immunocyte infiltration, immune pathways, immune checkpoint, and genomic instability indexes, was evaluated. Besides, the prognostic value of the CRS genes was tested. We selected the critical risky gene related to coagulation from the LASSO coefficients, for which we applied transwell and clone formation assays to confirm its roles in hepatoma cell migration and clone formation ability, respectively.

RESULTS

The CRS and the nomogram predicted patients' survival with good accuracy in both two datasets. The high-CRS group was associated with higher cell cycle, DNA repair, TP53 mutation rates, amplification, and lower deletion rates at chromosome 1. For immunocyte infiltration, we noticed increased Treg infiltration and globally upregulated immune checkpoints and genomic instability indexes. Additionally, every single CRS gene affected the patient's survival. Finally, we observed that RABIF was the riskiest gene in the CRS. Its knockdown suppressed hepatoma cell migration and clone formation capability, which could be rescued by RABIF overexpression.

CONCLUSION

We built a robust CRS with great potential as a prognosis and immunotherapeutic indicator. Importantly, we identified RABIF as an oncogene, promoting hepatoma cell migration and clone formation, revealing underlying pathological mechanisms, and providing novel therapeutic targets for hepatoma treatment.

Clinical significance of DNA damage response mutations in stage I and stage IIIa NSCLC

BACKGROUND

DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are essential to sustain genomic stability and play a critical role in cancer development and progression. Here, we investigated the profile of DDR gene mutations in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and their prognostic values.

METHODS

We first examined 74 DDR genes involved in seven DDR pathways and then focused on six specific genes: ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK1, BARD1, and BRIP1. A total of 179 stage I and IIIa NSCLC patients who received curative resection in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and their corresponding samples were collected for DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry and survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 167 eligible patients were finally analyzed. Mutation frequencies were 82% and 26.3% for the selected 74 genes and six genes, respectively. Mismatch repair (MMR) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) alterations were observed more frequently in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and smokers were more likely to develop the selected six DDR gene mutations than those who never smoked. Deleterious mutations in the six genes were independent prognostic indicators of significantly longer disease-free survival and overall survival. No association was found between DDR gene status and PD-L1 expression, CD8 positive lymphocyte and tumor-associated macrophage infiltration in tumor area. However, numbers of mutations were significantly increased among patients with DDR alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Deleterious mutations of these six genes were common in resected NSCLC and could serve as prognostic biomarkers.

Tackling the immunotherapy conundrum: advances and challenges for operable non-small-cell lung cancer treatment

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the majority of lung cancer cases, and its standard treatment is primarily surgery. Nonetheless, this type of cancer exhibits an important rate of tumor recurrence. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant survival benefits in many cancers, especially in early-stage NSCLC. This review considers the latest CheckMate816, IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials that led to US FDA approvals. The new wave of resectable NSCLC trial results are also summarized. Finally, the latest challenges for these treatment modalities, such as the choice between neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, the accurate identification of biomarkers and the presence of driver mutations such as EGFR, are discussed.

Combination of genomic instability score and TP53 status for prognosis prediction in lung adenocarcinoma

The genomic instability (GI) /homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, calculated as the sum of the events of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), large-scale state transition (LST) and telomere allele imbalance (TAI), is used to guide the choice of treatment in several cancers, but its relationship with genomic features, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in lung cancer is poorly understood, which could lead to population bias in prospective studies. We retrospectively analyzed 1011 lung cancer patients whose tumor samples were successfully profiled by high-throughput sequencing panel including GI/HRD score. Alterations of many cancer suppressor genes were associated with higher GI/HRD scores, biallelic inactivation of TP53 was correlated with a high GI/HRD score. A combination of two gene alterations exhibited a higher GI/HRD scores than single gene alterations. The GI/HRD score was associated with advanced stages in lung adenocarcinoma but not in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, patients with higher GI/HRD scores had significantly shorter overall survival and progression-free survival than patients with lower GI/HRD scores. Finally, patients with a combination of a higher GI/HRD scores and TP53 alteration exhibited an extremely poor prognosis compared with patients with a lower GI/HRD scores and wild-type TP53 (overall survival, training cohort, hazard ratio (HR) = 8.56, P < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 6.47, P < 0.001; progression-free survival, HR = 4.76, P < 0.001). Our study revealed the prognostic value of the GI/HRD score in lung adenocarcinoma, but not for all lung cancer. Moreover, the combination of the GI/HRD score and TP53 status could be a promising strategy to predict the prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III lung squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has been proven to be a successful therapeutic strategy for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, there is a paucity of information regarding surgical feasibility and safety as well as tumor response. The present study aimed to investigate the therapeutic and surgical outcomes for patients with stage III lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).

Methods

Patients with stage III potentially resectable LSCC treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University between March 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively included. Oncologic outcomes and intraoperative and postoperative variables were assessed.

Results

A total of 17 locally advanced LSCC patients were included in the study. Patients in stages IIIA and IIIB were represented by 10 (58.8%) and 7 (41.2%) cases, respectively. A minimally invasive procedure was successfully completed in 12 out of 17 cases (70.6%). A total of 10 patients (58.8%) had standard lobectomies performed, 1 (5.9%) had a bilobectomy, 3 (17.6%) had pneumonectomies, and 1 (5.9%) had a wedge resection. A total of 7 patients (41.2%) experienced postoperative complications, and there were no 30- or 90-day mortalities. The 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 76.6% and 82.5%, respectively. The rate of major pathological response (MPR) was 70.6%.

Conclusions

Lung resection after immunochemotherapy for potentially resectable stage III LSCC is feasible and safe. This treatment strategy results in a significant pathologic response and promising rates of OS at 2 years.

PHF5A is a potential diagnostic, prognostic, and immunological biomarker in pan-cancer

Studying the molecular mechanisms and regulatory functions of genes is crucial for exploring new approaches and tactics in cancer therapy. Studies have shown that the aberrant expression of PHF5A in tumors is linked to the origin and advancement of multiple cancers. However, its role in diagnosis, prognosis, and immunological prediction has not been comprehensively investigated in a pan-cancer analysis. Using several bioinformatic tools, we conducted a systematic examination of the potential carcinogenesis of PHF5A in various tumors from multiple aspects. Our analysis indicated that PHF5A expression varied between normal and tumor tissues and was linked to clinical diagnosis and prognosis in various cancers. The results confirmed a notable variation in the levels of PHF5A promoter methylation among several types of primary tumor and normal tissues and methylation of the PHF5A promoter played a guiding role in prognosis in some cancers. According to our findings, PHF5A played a critical role in tumor immunity and it might be an excellent target for anticancer immunotherapy. To sum up, PHF5A can be used in pan-cancer diagnostics, prognostics, and immunotherapy.

Case report: Identification of potential prognosis-related LAG3 overexpression and DICER1 mutation in pituitary carcinoma: two cases

Metastatic PitNETs are a rare life-threatening condition with poor prognosis and documentation. Due to the scarce literature and lack of precise treatment, we hope to better characterise PitNET using the next-generation whole exon sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing. This case study outlines a 54 years-old man and a 52 years-old woman who were both diagnosed with PitNET and analysis of peripheral blood and tumours were performed by WES and RNA sequencing. Analysis showed that DICER1 mutations in precancerous lesions and LAG3 overexpression were significant in aiding the prognosis and diagnosis of PitNETs. The first case with overexpressed LAG3 and DICER1 mutation died 26 months later, and the second case with LAG3 overexpression achieved partial remission. This study revealed that heightened expression of LAG3 offered promising targets for ICI and mutations in DICER1 could provide markers for effective diagnosis and prognosis.

Multi-omics analysis of MRPL-13 as a tumor-promoting marker from pan-cancer to lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

As a member of the mitochondrial ribosomal protein family, mitochondrial ribosomal protein L13 (MRPL13) is responsible for synthesizing mitochondrial proteins in cells. Several studies have indicated that MRPL13 is associated with the proliferation cycle, migration ability, apoptosis and autophagy of cancer cells. However, a thorough examination of MRPL13 across cancers remains uncertain. Therefore, we tried to clarify the relationship between MRPL13 and pan-cancer, and verified it in lung adenocarcinoma by various methods. Finally, our research is expected to reveal new targets for pan-cancer treatment and improve the prognosis of cancer patients.

METHODS

Using bioinformatics tools, we quantified the differential expression of MRPL13 between cancer tissues and corresponding or noncorresponding normal tissues across cancers. We also analyzed the relationships between MRPL13 expression levels and several factors, including diagnosis, prognosis, mutation, functional signaling pathways, immune infiltration, RNA modification, and the relationship with cuproptosis-related genes. Furthermore, we studied the relationship between the expression level of MRPL13 across cancers and the change in cancer functional status through single-cell data. In addition, quantitative experiments (PCR and Western blot) proved that the expression of MRPL13 was significantly different between LUAD and control samples. Finally, the effect of knocking out MRPL13 on cancer cells was compared by gene silencing experiments. In summary, we used a combination of bioinformatics and experimental applications to study the potential roles of MRPL13 in cancer.

RESULTS

After conducting a multidimensional analysis, we found that the application of MRPL13 multigroup analysis can effectively improve the diagnostic efficiency of various cancers and predict the prognosis of cancer. Moreover, MRPL13 in pan-cancer is related to the cancer immune infiltration pattern, methylation level and cuproptosis-related genes. Furthermore, single-cell data analysis showed that the modules of metastasis, EMT, cell cycle, DNA repair, invasion, DNA damage and proliferation were positively correlated with the expression of MRPL13 in LUAD (Lung adenocarcinoma), while the modules of hypoxia and inflammation were negatively correlated. Moreover, through quantitative experiments, we observed higher expression of MRPL13 in cancer tissues at the RNA or protein level. Knockdown of MRPL13 in LUAD led to decreased cancer cell survival, delayed tumor division and migration, reduced invasion, and increased cancer cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the potential of using MRPL13 as a molecular biomarker for diagnosing and suggesting the prognosis of certain malignant tumors. Furthermore, our research shows that MRPL13 may be an effective therapeutic target for lung adenocarcinoma.

[Identification of SULF1 as a Shared Gene in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Lung Adenocarcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an idiopathic chronic, progressive interstitial lung disease with a diagnosed median survival of 3-5 years. IPF is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Therefore, exploring the shared pathogenic genes and molecular pathways between IPF and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) holds significant importance for the development of novel therapeutic approaches and personalized precision treatment strategies for IPF combined with lung cancer.

METHODS

Bioinformatics analysis was conducted using publicly available gene expression datasets of IPF and LUAD from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis was employed to identify common genes involved in the progression of both diseases, followed by functional enrichment analysis. Subsequently, additional datasets were used to pinpoint the core shared genes between the two diseases. The relationship between core shared genes and prognosis, as well as their expression patterns, clinical relevance, genetic characteristics, and immune-related functions in LUAD, were analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and single-cell RNA sequencing datasets. Finally, potential therapeutic drugs related to the identified genes were screened through drug databases.

RESULTS

A total of 529 shared genes between IPF and LUAD were identified. Among them, SULF1 emerged as a core shared gene associated with poor prognosis. It exhibited significantly elevated expression levels in LUAD tissues, concomitant with high mutation rates, genomic heterogeneity, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Subsequent single-cell RNA-seq analysis revealed that the high expression of SULF1 primarily originated from tumor-associated fibroblasts. This study further demonstrated an association between SULF1 expression and tumor drug sensitivity, and it identified potential small-molecule drugs targeting SULF1 highly expressed fibroblasts.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified a set of shared molecular pathways and core genes between IPF and LUAD. Notably, SULF1 may serve as a potential immune-related biomarker and therapeutic target for both diseases.

Integrated analyses reveal the prognostic, immunological features and mechanisms of cuproptosis critical mediator gene FDX1 in KIRC

The ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) gene had been recently reported as a critical mediator of cuproptosis, and without doubt, its roles in KIRC would be of importance. Hence, this paper was to explore the roles of FDX1 in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) and its potential molecular mechanisms via scRNA-sequencing and bulk RNA-sequencing analyses. FDX1 was lowly expressed in KIRC and validated both at the protein and mRNA levels (all p < 0.05). Moreover, its elevated expression was linked with a better overall survival (OS) prognosis in KIRC (p < 0.01). The independent impact of FDX1 on KIRC prognosis was demonstrated by univariate/multivariate regression analysis (p < 0.01). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified seven pathways strongly associated with FDX1 in KIRC. Furthermore, FDX1 was also revealed to be significantly related with immunity (p < 0.05). In addition, patients with low expression of FDX1 might be more sensitive to immunotherapies. ScRNA-seq analysis found that FDX1 could be expressed in immune cells and was mainly differently expressed in Mono/Macro cells. Ultimately, we also identified several LncRNA/RBP/FDX1 mRNA networks to reveal its underlying mechanisms in KIRC. Taken together, FDX1 was closely related to prognosis and immunity in KIRC, and its RBP-involved mechanisms of LncRNA/RBP/FDX1 networks were also revealed by us.

Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) in Cutaneous Oncology

Skin cancers, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and melanoma, are the most common malignancies in the United States. Loss of DNA repair pathways in the skin plays a significant role in tumorigenesis. In recent years, targeting DNA repair pathways, particularly homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), has emerged as a potential therapeutic approach in cutaneous malignancies. This review provides an overview of DNA damage and repair pathways, with a focus on HRD, and discusses major advances in targeting these pathways in skin cancers. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been developed to exploit HRD in cancer cells. PARP inhibitors disrupt DNA repair mechanisms by inhibiting PARP enzymatic activity, leading to the accumulation of DNA damage and cell death. The concept of synthetic lethality has been demonstrated in HR-deficient cells, such as those with BRCA1/2 mutations, which exhibit increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. HRD assessment methods, including genomic scars, RAD51 foci formation, functional assays, and BRCA1/2 mutation analysis, are discussed as tools for identifying patients who may benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy. Furthermore, HRD has been implicated in the response to immunotherapy, and the combination of PARP inhibitors with immunotherapy has shown promising results. The frequency of HRD in melanoma ranges from 18% to 57%, and studies investigating the use of PARP inhibitors as monotherapy in melanoma are limited. Further research is warranted to explore the potential of PARP inhibition in melanoma treatment.

Advances in efficacy prediction and monitoring of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become mainstream in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The idea of harnessing the immune system to fight cancer is fast developing. Neoadjuvant treatment in NSCLC is undergoing unprecedented change. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations not only seem to achieve population-wide treating coverage irrespective of PD-L1 expression but also enable achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). Despite these recent advancements in neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, not all patients respond favorably to treatment with ICIs plus chemo and may even suffer from severe immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Similar to selection for target therapy, identifying patients most likely to benefit from chemo-immunotherapy may be valuable. Recently, several prognostic and predictive factors associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in NSCLC, such as tumor-intrinsic biomarkers, tumor microenvironment biomarkers, liquid biopsies, microbiota, metabolic profiles, and clinical characteristics, have been described. However, a specific and sensitive biomarker remains to be identified. Recently, the construction of prediction models for ICI therapy using novel tools, such as multi-omics factors, proteomic tests, host immune classifiers, and machine learning algorithms, has gained attention. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the different positive prognostic and predictive factors in treating preoperative patients with ICIs, highlight the recent advances made in the efficacy prediction of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and provide an outlook for joint predictors.

The role of molecular testing in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is highly aggressive and has few treatment options. To personalize therapy, it is critical to delineate molecular subtypes and understand inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. Germline testing for hereditary genetic abnormalities is recommended for all patients with PDA and somatic molecular testing is recommended for all patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. KRAS mutations are present in 90% of PDA, while 10% are KRAS wild type and are potentially targetable with epidermal growth factor receptor blockade. KRASG12C inhibitors have shown activity in G12C-mutated cancers, and novel G12D and pan-RAS inhibitors are in clinical trials. DNA damage repair abnormalities, germline or somatic, occur in 5-10% of patients and are likely to benefit from DNA damaging agents and maintenance therapy with poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors. Fewer than 1% of PDA harbor microsatellite instability high status and are susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade. Albeit very rare, occurring in <1% of patients with KRAS wild-type PDAs, BRAF V600E mutations, RET and NTRK fusions are targetable with cancer agnostic Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies. Genetic, epigenetic, and tumor microenvironment targets continue to be identified at an unprecedented pace, enabling PDA patients to be matched to targeted and immune therapeutics, including antibody-drug conjugates, and genetically engineered chimeric antigen receptor or T-cell receptor - T-cell therapies. In this review, we highlight clinically relevant molecular alterations and focus on targeted strategies that can improve patient outcomes through precision medicine.

Could Inhibiting the DNA Damage Repair Checkpoint Rescue Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor-Resistant Endometrial Cancer?

Endometrial cancer (EC) is increasingly undermining female health worldwide, with poor survival rates for advanced or recurrent/metastatic diseases. The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has opened a window of opportunity for patients with first-line therapy failure. However, there is a subset of patients with endometrial cancer who remain insensitive to immunotherapy alone. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new therapeutic agents and further explore reliable combinational strategies to optimize the efficacy of immunotherapy. DNA damage repair (DDR) inhibitors as novel targeted drugs are able to generate genomic toxicity and induce cell death in solid tumors, including EC. Recently, growing evidence has demonstrated the DDR pathway modulates innate and adaptive immunity in tumors. In this review, we concentrate on the exploration of the intrinsic correlation between DDR pathways, especially the ATM-CHK2-P53 pathway and the ATR-CHK1-WEE1 pathway, and oncologic immune response, as well as the feasibility of adding DDR inhibitors to ICIs for the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent/metastatic EC. We hope that this review will offer some beneficial references to the investigation of immunotherapy and provide a reasonable basis for "double-checkpoint inhibition" in EC.

Emerging evidence and treatment paradigm of non-small cell lung cancer

Research on biomarker-driven therapy and immune check-point blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. The width and depth of clinical trials have also dramatically improved in an unprecedented speed. The personalized treatment paradigm evolved every year. In this review, we summarize the promising agents that have shifted the treatment paradigm for NSCLC patients across all stages, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors. Based on recent evidence, we propose treatment algorithms for NSCLC and propose several unsolved clinical issues, which are being explored in ongoing clinical trials. The results of these trials are likely to impact future clinical practice.

Genomic landscape and efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Background

HER2-targeted therapy provides survival benefits to HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A better understanding of the clinical and genomic characterization of treatment-naïve HER2-positive NSCLC, as well as the efficacy of and resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in HER2-altered NSCLC, could promote further improvement of HER2 targeted therapy.

Methods

HER2-altered NSCLC patients was retrospectively included and their genomic profiles were performed by next-generation sequencing. The clinical outcomes included overall response rate, disease control rate and progression-free survival.

Results

Among 176 treatment-naïve patients with HER2 alterations, 64.8% harbored HER2 mutations with/without HER2 amplification, and 35.2% carried HER2 amplification only. Molecular characterization was correlated with tumor stage that late-stage NSCLC with HER2 oncogenic mutations showed a higher prevalence of TP53 mutations and a higher tumor mutation burden. However, this correlation was not found in patients with HER2 amplification only. Twenty-one patients with HER2 alterations treated with pyrotinib or afatinib were retrospectively enrolled. Pyrotinib yielded a longer median progression-free survival than afatinib (5.9 [95% CI, 3.8-13.0] vs. 4.0 months [95% CI, 1.9-6.3], P = 0.06) in these patients. Analysis of the genomic profiles before and after anti-HER2 targeted therapies identified de novo HER2 copy number gain and G518W mutation, as well as mutations involving DNA damage repair signaling, SWI–SNF complex, and epigenetic regulations as potential resistance mechanisms.

Conclusion

HER2-mutant NSCLC had different molecular features from HER2-amplified NSCLC, and its genomic profile was dependent of tumor stage. Pyrotinib had superior therapeutic effects than afatinib in HER2-altered NSCLC, although larger cohorts are warranted to validate it. HER2-dependent and -independent resistance mechanisms to afatinib and pyrotinib were unveiled.

Progress and perspectives of perioperative immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Lung cancer mortality has decreased over the past decade, which is partly attributed to improved treatments. Curative surgery for patients with early-stage lung cancer is the standard of care, but not all surgical treatments have a good prognosis. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are used to improve the prognosis of patients with resectable lung cancer. Immunotherapy, an epoch-defining treatment, has improved curative effects, prognosis, and tolerability compared with traditional and ordinary cytotoxic chemotherapy, providing new hope for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunotherapy-related clinical trials have reported encouraging clinical outcomes in their exploration of different types of perioperative immunotherapy, from neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, neoadjuvant immune-combination therapy (chemoimmunotherapy, immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy, immunotherapy plus radiotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiotherapy), adjuvant immunotherapy, and neoadjuvant combined adjuvant immunotherapy. Phase 3 studies such as IMpower 010 and CheckMate 816 reported survival benefits of perioperative immunotherapy for operable patients. This review summarizes up-to-date clinical studies and analyzes the efficiency and feasibility of different neoadjuvant therapies and biomarkers to identify optimal types of perioperative immunotherapy for NSCLC.

Progress on neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer and potential biomarkers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly concerned in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), represented by inhibitors of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), and inhibitors of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4). The introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment of perioperative NSCLC has improved the prognosis to a great extent, as demonstrated by several phase II and III clinical trials. The target population for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC is still under discussion, and the biomarkers for neoadjuvant immunotherapy population selection are the next pending problem. The predictive efficacy of many potential makers is still being explored, including PD-L1 expression levels, tumor mutation burden, circulating tumor DNA, components of the tumor microenvironment, and several clinical factors. We summarize key findings on the utility of ICIs in clinical trials of preoperative NSCLC patients and conclude analyses of relevant biomarkers to provide a better understanding of potentially predictive biomarkers in neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Emerging precision neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: current status and perspectives

Over the past decade, targeted therapy for oncogene-driven NSCLC and immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-oncogene-driven NSCLC, respectively, have greatly improved the survival and quality of life for patients with unresectable NSCLC. Increasingly, these biomarker-guided systemic therapies given before or after surgery have been used in patients with early-stage NSCLC. In March 2022, the US FDA granted the approval of neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy for patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Several phase II/III trials are evaluating the clinical efficacy of various neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations for non-oncogene-driven NSCLC and neoadjuvant molecular targeted therapies for oncogene-driven NSCLC, respectively. However, clinical application of precision neoadjuvant treatment requires a paradigm shift in the biomarker testing and multidisciplinary collaboration at the diagnosis of early-stage NSCLC. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the current diagnosis and treatment landscape, recent advances, new challenges in biomarker testing and endpoint selections, practical considerations for a timely multidisciplinary collaboration at diagnosis, and perspectives in emerging neoadjuvant precision systemic therapy for patients with resectable, early-stage NSCLC. These biomarker-guided neoadjuvant therapies hold the promise to improve surgical and pathological outcomes, reduce systemic recurrences, guide postoperative therapy, and improve cure rates in patients with resectable NSCLC.

Development and validation of a mutation-based model to predict immunotherapeutic efficacy in NSCLC

Background

Immunotherapy has become increasingly important in the perioperative period of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we intended to develop a mutation-based model to predict the therapeutic effificacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with NSCLC.

Methods

Random Forest (RF) classifiers were generated to identify tumor gene mutated features associated with immunotherapy outcomes. Then the best classifier with the highest accuracy served for the development of the predictive model. The correlations of some reported biomarkers with the model were analyzed, such as TMB, PD-(L)1, KEAP1-driven co-mutations, and immune subtypes. The training cohort and validation cohorts performed survival analyses to estimate the predictive efficiency independently.

Results

An 18-gene set was selected using random forest (RF) classififiers. A predictive model was developed based on the number of mutant genes among the candidate genes, and patients were divided into the MT group (mutant gene ≥ 2) and WT group (mutant gene < 2). The MT group (N = 54) had better overall survival (OS) compared to the WT group (N = 290); the median OS was not reached vs. nine months (P < 0.0001, AUC = 0.73). The robust predictive performance was confifirmed in three validation cohorts, with an AUC of 0.70, 0.57, and 0.64 (P < 0.05). The MT group was characterized by high tumor neoantigen burden (TNB), increased immune infifiltration cells such as CD8 T and macrophage cells, and upregulated immune checkpoint molecules, suggesting potential biological advantages in ICIs therapy.

Conclusions

The predictive model could precisely predict the immunotherapeutic efficacy in NSCLC based on the mutant genes within the model. Furthermore, some immune-related features and cell expression could support robust efficiency.

Stereotactic body proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical indications and recommendations

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment approach for early-stage lung cancer and intrathoracic oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. While local control is often excellent with this modality when delivered with photon therapy, toxicities for select patients can be significant. Proton therapy offers a unique opportunity to widen the therapeutic window when treating patients with thoracic malignancies requiring or benefitting from ultra-high doses per fraction. Thoracic proton SBRT may be particularly beneficial in cases requiring dose escalation, for tumors >5 cm, for central or ultra-central tumors, for reirradiation, in patients with interstitial lung diseases, and when combining radiation with immunotherapy. These clinical indications are detailed, along with supporting literature and clinical recommendations. Other considerations, future directions and potential benefits of proton SBRT, including sparing lymphocytes, when delivered as intensity-modulated proton therapy or as FLASH, and for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer or in patients with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, are also discussed.