Circulating ESR1 mutations at the end of aromatase inhibitor adjuvant treatment and after relapse in breast cancer patients

Androgen receptor and estrogen receptor variants in prostate and breast cancers

The androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) are steroid receptor transcription factors with critical roles in the development and progression of prostate and breast cancers. Advances in the understanding of mechanisms underlying the ligand-dependent activation of these transcription factors have contributed to the development of small molecule inhibitors that block AR and ERα actions. These inhibitors include competitive antagonists and degraders that directly bind the ligand binding domains of these receptors, luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs that suppress gonadal synthesis of testosterone or estrogen, and drugs that block specific enzymes required for biosynthesis of testosterone or estrogen. However, resistance to these therapies is frequent, and is often driven by selection for tumor cells with alterations in the AR or ESR1 genes and/or alternatively spliced AR or ESR1 mRNAs that encode variant forms AR or ERα. While most investigations involving AR have been within the context of prostate cancer, and the majority of investigations involving ERα have been within the context of breast cancer, important roles for AR have been elucidated in breast cancer, and important roles for ERα have been elucidated in prostate cancer. Here, we will discuss the roles of AR and ERα in breast and prostate cancers, outline the effects of gene- and mRNA-level alterations in AR and ESR1 on progression of these diseases, and identify strategies that are being developed to target these alterations therapeutically.

ESR1 Gene Mutations and Liquid Biopsy in ER-Positive Breast Cancers: A Small Step Forward, a Giant Leap for Personalization of Endocrine Therapy?

The predominant forms of breast cancer (BC) are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors characterized by the expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) and/or progesterone receptors (PRs). Patients with HR+ tumors can benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Three types of ET are approved for the treatment of HR+ BCs and include selective ER modulators, aromatase inhibitors, and selective ER downregulators. ET is the mainstay of adjuvant treatment in the early setting and the backbone of the first-line treatment in an advanced setting; however, the emergence of acquired resistance can lead to cancer recurrence or progression. The mechanisms of ET resistance are often related to the occurrence of mutations in the ESR1 gene, which encodes the ER-alpha protein. As ESR1 mutations are hardly detectable at diagnosis but are present in 30% to 40% of advanced BC (ABC) after treatment, the timeline of testing is crucial. To manage this resistance, ESR1 testing has recently been recommended; in ER+ HER2- ABC and circulating cell-free DNA, so-called liquid biopsy appears to be the most convenient way to detect the emergence of ESR1 mutations. Technically, several options exist, including Next Generation Sequencing and ultra-sensitive PCR-based techniques. In this context, personalization of ET through the surveillance of ESR1 mutations in the plasma of HR+ BC patients throughout the disease course represents an innovative way to improve the standard of care.

Genomic Alterations Associated with Estrogen Receptor Pathway Activity in Metastatic Breast Cancer Have a Differential Impact on Downstream ER Signaling

Mutations in the estrogen receptor gene (ESR1), its transcriptional regulators, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway are enriched in patients with endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Here, we integrated whole genome sequencing with RNA sequencing data from the same samples of 101 ER-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients who underwent a tumor biopsy prior to the start of a new line of treatment for MBC (CPCT-02 study, NCT01855477) to analyze the downstream effects of DNA alterations previously linked to endocrine resistance, thereby gaining a better understanding of the associated mechanisms. Hierarchical clustering was performed using expression of ESR1 target genes. Genomic alterations at the DNA level, gene expression levels, and last administered therapy were compared between the identified clusters. Hierarchical clustering revealed two distinct clusters, one of which was characterized by increased expression of ESR1 and its target genes. Samples in this cluster were significantly enriched for mutations in ESR1 and amplifications in FGFR1 and TSPYL. Patients in the other cluster showed relatively lower expression levels of ESR1 and its target genes, comparable to ER-negative samples, and more often received endocrine therapy as their last treatment before biopsy. Genes in the MAPK-pathway, including NF1, and ESR1 transcriptional regulators were evenly distributed. In conclusion, RNA sequencing identified a subgroup of patients with clear expression of ESR1 and its downstream targets, probably still benefiting from ER-targeting agents. The lower ER expression in the other subgroup might be partially explained by ER activity still being blocked by recently administered endocrine treatment, indicating that biopsy timing relative to endocrine treatment needs to be considered when interpreting transcriptomic data.

Development of sensitive and robust multiplex digital PCR assays for the detection of ESR1 mutations in the plasma of metastatic breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Early detection of ESR1 mutations is a key element for better personalization of the management of patients with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC). Analysis of circulating tumor DNA from liquid biopsies is a particularly well-suited strategy for longitudinal monitoring of such patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the naica® three-color digital PCR platform, we developed a screening assay allowing the detection of 11 ESR1 mutations and designed a sequential strategy for precise mutation identification. We then applied this strategy in the analysis of plasma circulating cell-free DNA from 109 HR+/HER2- MBC patients and performed a double-blind comparison study on a subset of patients, with the multiplex assay used at the Institut Curie (IC) for the PADA-1 study.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (28.4%) harboured at least one ESR1 mutation, with the following frequencies: D538G (41.03%), Y537S (25.64%), E380Q (10.26%), Y537N (10.26%), "(536-540)" (7.69%), Y537C (2.56%), and L536R (2.56%). The presence of ESR1 mutation(s) was significantly associated with liver metastases (p = 0.0091). A very good agreement (91%) was observed with the IC assay.

CONCLUSION

Our assays have proven to be robust and highly sensitive and are very well-suited for monitoring ESR1 mutations in the plasma of MBC patients.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors Overcome Endocrine ESR1 Mutation-Related Resistance in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

ESR1 mutations contribute to endocrine resistance and occur in a high percentage of hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) cases. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) changed the treatment landscape of HR+ mBC, as they are able to overcome estrogen resistance. The present retrospective study investigates the clinical benefit of CDK4/6i in ESR1 mutant HR+ mBC patients treated with a CDK4/6i as first- or second-line therapy. Plasma was collected at baseline prior to CDK4/6i plus hormone therapy as a first- or second-line treatment. Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from plasma, and ESR1 mutation analysis was performed on a ddPCR. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate the predictive power of ESR1 mutations and any association with clinical factors. A total of 42 patients with mBC treated with CDK4/6i plus endocrine therapy as first- (n = 35) or second-line (n = 7) were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients received hormonal therapy (AI or tamoxifen) in the adjuvant setting. ESR1 mutation status in blood was associated with shorter median disease-free survival (DFS) (30 vs. 110 months; p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed ESR1 mutations as independent factors of resistance in adjuvant hormone therapy. On the contrary, no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the presence or absence of an ESR1 mutation in patients treated with CDK4/6i as first-line treatment (p = 0.29). No statistically significant correlation between the best response to CDK4/6i and ESR1 mutation was found (p = 0.46). This study indicates that the ESR1 mutation detected in cfDNA is an independent predictive factor of clinical recurrence in the adjuvant setting and that CDK4/6i can overcome ESR1-dependent resistance.

The Clinical Utility of ESR1 Mutations in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer

The estrogen receptor is a key driver of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Accumulating evidence indicates that the ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations have an important role in acquired endocrine resistance, mainly to treatment with aromatase inhibitors. The identification, monitoring, and targeting of ESR1 mutations is an evolving field of major interest given the potential of improved outcomes in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. Herein, the authors review the current evidence and rationale for exploiting the ESR1 mutations as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target. The authors discuss the role of ESR1 testing and current therapeutic efforts to target these mutations.

Circulating tumour DNA dynamics for assessment of molecular residual disease and for intercepting resistance in breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Longitudinal evaluation of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) represents a promising tool for monitoring tumour evolution. In patients with breast cancer, ctDNA dynamics for the assessment of molecular residual disease (MRD) and resistances may, respectively, help clinicians in treatment modulation of adjuvant treatments, and in anticipating resistance to ongoing treatments and switch treatments before clinical progression, to improve disease control. Anyway, the introduction of this dynamic biomarker into clinical practice requires the demonstration of analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility.

RECENT FINDINGS

In early breast cancer setting, several observational studies demonstrated the clinical validity of MRD monitoring through ctDNA in identifying patients at a higher risk of relapse, but many clinical trials evaluating the clinical utility are still ongoing, and few data resulted in inconclusive results.Instead, ctDNA dynamics for intercepting resistance have not been fully evaluated in terms of clinical validity, because monitoring schedules of most observational studies are not intensive. The only trial assessing their clinical utility (PADA-1) demonstrated a benefit in terms of progression-free survival, portraying a new landscape for clinical trials in this space.

SUMMARY

Rigorous clinical trials with adequate assays and patient-relevant endpoints are paramount to demonstrate the clinical utility of ctDNA dynamics and eventually increase clinical outcomes.

Identification of immune-related biomarkers for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy sensitivity in HER2 negative breast cancer via bioinformatics analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an important treatment for breast cancer (BC) patients. However, due to the lack of specific therapeutic targets, only 1/3 of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients reach pathological complete response (pCR). Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers to distinguish and predict NAC sensitive in BC patients.

METHODS

The GSE163882 dataset, containing 159 BC patients treated with NAC, was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Patients with pathological complete response (pCR) and those with residual disease (RD) were compared to obtain the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Functional enrichment analyses were conducted on these DEGs. Then, we intersect the DEGs and immune-related genes to obtain the hub immune biomarkers, and then use the linear fitting model ("glm" package) to construct a prediction model composed of 9 immune biomarkers. Finally, the single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm was used to analyze immune cell invasion in BC patients, and the correlation between immune cell content and immune gene expression levels was analyzed.

RESULTS

Nine immune-related biomarkers were obtained in the intersection of DEGs and immune-related genes. Compared with RD patients, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL13, GZMB, IDO1, and LYZ were highly expressed in pCR patients, while CXCL14 and ESR1 were lowly expressed in pCR patients. After linear fitting of the multi-gene expression model, the area under the curve (AUC) value of the ROC curve diagnosis of pCR patients was 0.844. Immunoinfiltration analysis showed that compared with RD patients, 15 of the 28 immune cell types examined showed high-infiltration in pCR patients, including activated CD8 T cells, effector memory CD8 T cells, and activated CD4 T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation ultimately identified 9 immune-related biomarkers as potential tools for assessing the sensitivity of NAC in HER2-negative BC patients. These biomarkers have great potential for predicting pCR BC patients.

Place des biopsies liquides dans le diagnostic et la caractérisation moléculaire des cancers du sein

The tumor biopsy remains essential for breast cancer diagnosis and characterization. Indeed, the treatment is decided according to histological subtype, and according to the presence of targetable molecular alterations. Notably, the presence of hormone receptors, ERBB2 hyperexpression or the existence of PIK3CA or ESR1 mutations are among the alterations commonly investigated. But these biological characteristics are determined only partially by tumor biopsy, due to tumor heterogeneity or tumor plasticity that happens spontaneously or under treatment. Liquid biopsy, and in particular circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells, is a non-invasive method to identify and characterize the presence of cancer in the blood. The aim of this review is to determine the value of liquid biopsy to enhance or replace the data provided by a tumor biopsy.

Circulating PIK3CA mutation detection at diagnosis in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive BC subtype with poor outcomes. A targetable somatic PIK3CA mutation is reported in 30% of IBC, allowing for treatment by PI3Kα-specific inhibitors, such as alpelisib. The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection rate of circulating PIK3CA mutation in locally-advanced IBC (LAIBC) patients harbouring a PIK3CA mutation on initial biopsy. This monocentric retrospective study was based on available stored plasma samples and tumour biopsies at diagnosis from all LAIBC patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) between 2008 and 2018 at the Centre Henri Becquerel. PIK3CA mutations (E542K, E545K, H1047R/L) were assessed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in plasma samples and tumoral tissue at diagnosis. A total of 55 patients were included. Overall, 14/55 patients (25%) had a PIK3CA mutation identified on baseline biopsy (H1047R = 8; H1047L = 3; E545K = 2; E542K = 1). Among them, 11 (79%) patients had enough DNA for circulating DNA analyses, and corresponding circulating PIK3CA mutations were found in 6/11 (55%). Among the 41 patients without PIK3CA mutations on biopsy, 32 (78%) had enough DNA for circulating DNA analysis, and no circulating PIK3CA mutation was identified. Our results revealed no prognostic or predictive value of PIK3CA mutations at the diagnosis of non-metastatic IBC but highlighted the prognostic value of the cfDNA rate at diagnosis. Our study showed that a corresponding circulating PIK3CA mutation was identified in 55% of LAIBC patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumours, while no circulating mutation was found among patients with PI3KCA wild-type tumours.

Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling From Breast Cancer Screening Through to Metastatic Disease

PURPOSE

We investigated the utility of the Oncomine Breast cfDNA Assay for detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in women from a breast screening population, including healthy women with no abnormality detected by mammogram, and women on follow-up through to advanced breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood samples were taken from 373 women (127 healthy controls recruited through breast screening, 28 ductal carcinoma in situ, 60 primary breast cancers, 47 primary breast cancer on follow-up, and 111 metastatic breast cancers [MBC]) to recover plasma and germline DNA for analysis with the Oncomine Breast cfDNA Assay on the Ion S5 platform.

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen of 373 plasma samples had one or more somatic variants detected across eight of the 10 genes and were called ctDNA-positive; MBC had the highest proportion of ctDNA-positive samples (61; 55%) and healthy controls the lowest (20; 15.7%). ESR1, TP53, and PIK3CA mutations account for 93% of all variants detected and predict poor overall survival in MBC (hazard ratio = 3.461; 95% CI, 1.866 to 6.42; P = .001). Patients with MBC had higher plasma cell-free DNA levels, higher variant allele frequencies, and more polyclonal variants, notably in ESR1 than in all other groups. Only 15 individuals had evidence of potential clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential mutations.

CONCLUSION

We were able detect ctDNA across the breast cancer spectrum, notably in MBC where variants in ESR1, TP53, and PIK3CA predicted poor overall survival. The assay could be used to monitor emergence of resistance mutations such as in ESR1 that herald resistance to aromatase inhibitors to tailor adjuvant therapies. However, we suggest caution is needed when interpreting results from a single plasma sample as variants were also detected in a small proportion of HCs.

Resistance to endocrine therapy in HR + and/or HER2 + breast cancer: the most promising predictive biomarkers

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. It is a heterogeneous disease, encompassing different biological subtypes that differ in histological features, outcomes, clinical behaviour and different molecular subtypes. Therapy has progressed substantially over the past years with a reduction both for locoregional and systemic therapy. Endocrine therapies have considerably reduced cancer recurrence and mortality. Despite the major diagnostic and therapeutic innovations, resistance to therapy has become a main challenge, especially in metastatic breast cancer, and became a major factor limiting the use of endocrine therapeutic agents in ER positive breast cancers. Approximately 50% of patients with ER positive metastatic disease achieve a complete or partial response with endocrine therapy. However, in the remaining patients, the benefit is limited due to resistance, intrinsic or acquired, resulting in disease progression and poor outcome.Tumour heterogeneity as well as acquired genetic changes and therapeutics pressure have been involved in the endocrine therapy resistance. Nowadays, targeted sequencing of genes involved in cancer has provided insights about genomic tumour evolution throughout treatment and resistance driver mutations. Several studies have described multiple alterations in receptor tyrosine kinases, signalling pathways such as Phosphoinositide-3-kinase-protein kinase B/Akt/mTOR (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) and Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), cell cycle machinery and their implications in endocrine treatment failure.One of the current concern in cancer is personalized therapy. The focus has been the discovery of new potentially predictive biomarkers capable to identify reliably the most appropriate therapy regimen and which patients will experience disease relapse. The major concern is also to avoid overtreatment/undertreatment and development of resistance.This review focuses on the most promising predictive biomarkers of resistance in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and the emerging role of circulating free-DNA as a powerful tool for longitudinal monitoring of tumour molecular profile throughout treatment.

Plasma-Based Genotyping in Advanced Solid Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Molecular genotyping for advanced solid malignancies has transformed the clinical management of patients with metastatic disease. Treatment decisions in a growing number of tumors require knowledge of molecularly driven alterations in order to select optimal targeted therapy. Although genomic testing of tumor tissue is the gold standard for identifying targetable genomic alterations, biopsy samples are often limited or difficult to access. This has paved the way for the development of plasma-based approaches for genomic profiling. Recent advances in the detection of plasma-circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have enabled the integration of plasma-based molecular profiling into clinical practice as an alternative or complementary tool for genomic testing in the setting of advanced cancer, to facilitate the identification of driver mutations to guide initial treatment and diagnose resistance. Several guidelines now recommend the use of plasma where tumor tissue is limited to identify a targetable genomic alteration. Current plasma-based assays can evaluate multiple genes in comprehensive panels, and their application in advanced disease will be increasingly incorporated into standard practice. This review focuses on current and future applications of plasma ctDNA-based assays in advanced solid malignancies, while highlighting some limitations in implementing this technology into clinical practice.

Liquid Biopsy in Breast Cancer: A Focused Review

CONTEXT.—

The role of liquid biopsy in cancer management has been gaining increased prominence in the past decade, with well-defined clinical applications now being established in lung cancer. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration also approved the Therascreen PIK3CA RGQ polymerase chain reaction assay as a companion diagnostic assay to detect PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer for both tissue and liquid biopsies, bringing the role of liquid biopsy in breast cancer management to the fore. Its utility in other aspects of breast cancer, however, is yet to be clearly defined.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the studies that looked at liquid biopsies in breast cancer and examine their potential for clinical application in the areas of early diagnosis, prognostication, monitoring disease response, detecting minimal residual disease, and predicting risk of progression or relapse. We focus mainly on circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA.

DATA SOURCES.—

Peer-reviewed articles in PubMed.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Liquid biopsies in breast cancers have yielded promising results, especially in the areas of monitoring treatment response and predicting disease progression or relapse. With further study, and hopefully coupled with continued improvements in technologies that isolate tumor-derived materials, liquid biopsies may go on to play a greater role in the breast cancer clinic.

Super-ARMS: A new method for plasma ESR1 mutation detection

BACKGROUND

ESR1 mutation is an important mechanism of drug resistance and recurrence in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients during AI treatment. Patient could still benefit from treatment with fulvestrant after ESR1 mutated.

OBJECTIVE

At present, there is still no suitable method to detect ESR1 mutation in plasma as clinical promotion method. We aim to improve from ARMS-PCR to get a method with higher sensitivity but no additional cost is incurred.

METHODS

We designed new primers for ESR1. Then positive and negative standard sample was used for sensitivity and specificity tests. Lastly, we collected patient peripheral blood sample and analyzed the performance of Super-ARMS in plasma ctDNA samples.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were enrolled in this study, including 142 prime breast cancer (PBC) patients and 65 metastasis breast cancer(MBC) patients. The mutation rate was as high as 27.9%(12/43) in MBC patients with AI treatment. But only 2.97%(3/101) in PBC patients with AI and 0% in both MBC or PBC patient without AI. There was no significant difference in Super-ARMS results compared with DDPCR method.

CONCLUSION

Super-ARMS is a method that has sensitivity close to DDPCR and has the convenience and low price of ARMS-PCR for plasma ctDNA ESR1 mutation detection. It has obvious advantages compared with other method such NGS and DDPCR as clinical promotion method.

Clinical application of circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The recent advancement in massively parallel sequencing technologies has empowered liquid biopsies, in particular circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, to be the new paradigm in personalized cancer management. Plasma ctDNA detection overcomes the current limitations in tumor tissue procurement and serves as a convenient and non-invasive method to capture tumor heterogeneity and genetic evolution along patients' cancer journey. In breast cancer, the current clinical application of ctDNA includes real-time monitoring of tumor response, detection of drug-resistant clones, assessing dynamic variations in tumor mutational landscape, identifying actionable mutations, detecting minimal residual disease and screening of early tumor.

PURPOSE

This review aims to summarize the current clinical evidence of ctDNA application in the management of breast cancer.

Current trends in the treatment of HR+/HER2+ breast cancer

Treatment for HR+/HER2+ patients has been debated, as some tumors within this luminal HER2+ subtype behave like luminal A cancers, whereas others behave like non-luminal HER2+ breast cancers. Recent research and clinical trials have revealed that a combination of hormone and targeted anti-HER2 approaches without chemotherapy provides long-term disease control for at least some HR+/HER2+ patients. Novel anti-HER2 therapies, including neratinib and trastuzumab emtansine, and new agents that are effective in HR+ cancers, including the next generation of oral selective estrogen receptor downregulators/degraders and CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib, are now being evaluated in combination. This review discusses current trials and results from previous studies that will provide the basis for current recommendations on how to treat newly diagnosed patients with HR+/HER2+ disease.

ESR1 NAPA Assay: Development and Analytical Validation of a Highly Sensitive and Specific Blood-Based Assay for the Detection of ESR1 Mutations in Liquid Biopsies

Simple Summary

A considerable number of estrogen-receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer patients develop resistance to endocrine treatment. One of the most important resistance mechanisms is the presence of ESR1 mutations. In the present study, we developed and analytically validated a novel, highly sensitive and specific nuclease-assisted minor-allele enrichment with probe-overlap (NaME-PrO)-assisted Amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) (NAPA) assay for the detection of four ESR1 mutations (Y537S, Y537C, Y537N and D538G). The assay was further applied in 13 ER+ breast cancer (BrCa) primary tumour tissues (FFPEs), 13 non-cancerous breast tissues (mammoplasties), and 32 pairs of liquid biopsy samples [circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and paired plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)] obtained at different time points from 8 ER+ metastatic breast cancer patients. In the plasma ctDNA, the ESR1 mutations were not identified at the baseline, whereas the D538G mutation was detected during the follow-up period at five consecutive time points in one patient. In the CTCs, only the Y537C mutation was detected in one patient sample at the baseline. A direct comparison of the ESR1 NAPA assay with the drop-off ddPCR using 32 identical plasma ctDNA samples gave a concordance of 90.6%. We present a low-cost, highly specific, sensitive and robust assay for blood-based ESR1 profiling.

Abstract

A considerable number of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER⁺ BrCa) patients develop resistance to endocrine treatment. One of the most important resistance mechanisms is the presence of ESR1 mutations. We developed and analytically validated a highly sensitive and specific NaME-PrO-assisted ARMS (NAPA) assay for the detection of four ESR1 mutations (Y537S, Y537C, Y537N and D538G) in circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and paired plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in patients with ER⁺ BrCa. The analytical specificity, analytical sensitivity and reproducibility of the assay were validated using synthetic oligos standards. We further applied the developed ESR1 NAPA assay in 13 ER⁺ BrCa primary tumour tissues, 13 non-cancerous breast tissues (mammoplasties) and 64 liquid biopsy samples: 32 EpCAM-positive cell fractions and 32 paired plasma ctDNA samples obtained at different time points from 8 ER+ metastatic breast cancer patients, during a 5-year follow-up period. Peripheral blood from 11 healthy donors (HD) was used as a control. The developed assay is highly sensitive (a detection of mutation-allelic-frequency (MAF) of 0.5% for D538G and 0.1% for Y537S, Y537C, Y537N), and highly specific (0/13 mammoplasties and 0/11 HD for all mutations). In the plasma ctDNA, ESR1 mutations were not identified at the baseline, whereas the D538G mutation was detected in five sequential ctDNA samples during the follow-up period in the same patient. In the EpCAM-isolated cell fractions, only the Y537C mutation was detected in one patient sample at the baseline. A direct comparison of the ESR1 NAPA assay with the drop-off ddPCR using 32 identical plasma ctDNA samples gave a concordance of 90.6%. We present a low cost, highly specific, sensitive and robust assay for blood-based ESR1 profiling. The clinical performance of the ESR1 NAPA assay will be prospectively evaluated in a large number of well-characterized patient cohorts.

Detection of ESR1 Mutations Based on Liquid Biopsy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Clinical Impacts and Prospects

Endocrine therapy is the main treatment option for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC). Compared with other clinical subtypes, ER+ BC patients usually have a more favorable prognosis. However, almost all ER+ BCpatients develop endocrine resistance and disease progression eventually. A large number of studies based on liquid biopsy suggest that ESR1 mutations may play a key role in this process. For patients with ER+ metastatic BC (MBC), ESR1 is an important prognostic factor and may associate with the resistance to endocrine therapy, like aromatase inhibitors. The advances of sequencing technologies allow us to conduct longitudinal monitoring of disease and unveil the clinical implications of each ESR1 sub-clone in ER+ MBC. Moreover, since the ESR1-related endocrine resistance has not been fully addressed by existing agents, more potent cornerstone drugs should be developed as soon as possible. Herein, we reviewed the recent progress of detecting ESR1 mutations based on liquid biopsy and different sequencing technologies in ER+ MBC and discussed its clinical impacts and prospects.

Current Status of Circulating Tumor Cells, Circulating Tumor DNA, and Exosomes in Breast Cancer Liquid Biopsies

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Although the five-, ten- and fifteen-year survival rates are good for breast cancer patients diagnosed with early-stage disease, some cancers recur many years after completion of primary therapy. Tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution may lead to distant metastasis and therapy resistance, which are the main causes of breast cancer-associated deaths. In the clinic today, imaging techniques like mammography and tissue biopsies are used to diagnose breast cancer. Even though these methods are important in primary diagnosis, they have limitations when it comes to longitudinal monitoring of residual disease after treatment, disease progression, therapy responses, and disease recurrence. Over the last few years, there has been an increasing interest in the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive potential of circulating cancer-derived material acquired through liquid biopsies in breast cancer. Thanks to the development of sensitive devices and platforms, a variety of tumor-derived material, including circulating cancer cells (CTCs), circulating DNA (ctDNA), and biomolecules encapsulated in extracellular vesicles, can now be extracted and analyzed from body fluids. Here we will review the most recent studies on breast cancer, demonstrating the clinical potential and utility of CTCs and ctDNA. We will also review literature illustrating the potential of circulating exosomal RNA and proteins as future biomarkers in breast cancer. Finally, we will discuss some of the advantages and limitations of liquid biopsies and the future perspectives of this field in breast cancer management.

Estrogen Receptor Alpha Mutations in Breast Cancer Cells Cause Gene Expression Changes through Constant Activity and Secondary Effects

While breast cancer patients with tumors that express estrogen receptor α (ER) generally respond well to hormone therapies that block ER activity, a significant number of patients relapse. Approximately 30% of these recurrences harbor activating mutations in the ligand binding domain (LBD) of ER, which have been shown to confer ligand-independent function. However, much is still unclear regarding the effect of mutant ER beyond its estrogen independence. To investigate the molecular effects of mutant ER, we developed multiple isogenic ER-mutant cell lines for the most common LBD mutations, Y537S and D538G. These mutations induced differential expression of thousands of genes, the majority of which were mutant allele specific and were not observed upon estrogen treatment of wild-type (WT) cells. These mutant-specific genes showed consistent differential expression across ER-mutant lines developed in other laboratories. WT cells with long-term estrogen exposure only exhibited some of these transcriptional changes, suggesting that mutant ER causes novel regulatory effects that are not simply due to constant activity. While ER mutations exhibited minor effects on ER genomic binding, with the exception of ligand independence, ER mutations conferred substantial differences in chromatin accessibility. Mutant ER was bound to approximately a quarter of mutant-enriched accessible regions that were enriched for other DNA binding factors, including FOXA1, CTCF, and OCT1. Overall, our findings indicate that mutant ER causes several consistent effects on gene expression, both indirectly and through constant activity. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates the multiple roles of mutant ER in breast cancer progression, including constant ER activity and secondary regulatory effects on gene expression and chromatin accessibility. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/81/3/539/F1.large.jpg.See related commentary by Hermida-Prado and Jeselsohn, p. 537 See related article by Williams and colleagues, p. 732.

Advances in the Detection Technologies and Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumor DNA in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) represents the most commonly diagnosed cancer among females worldwide. Although targeted therapy has greatly improved the efficacy of treating BC, a large proportion of BC patients eventually develop recurrence or metastasis. Traditional invasive tumor tissue biopsy is short of comprehensiveness in tumor assessment due to heterogeneity. Liquid biopsy, an attractive non-invasive approach mainly including circulating tumor cell and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has been widely utilized in a variety of cancers with the advances of sequencing technologies in recent years. The ctDNA that is found circulating in body fluids refers to DNA released from tumor cells and has shown clinical utility in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). With the results of genomic variants detection, ctDNA could be used to predict clinical outcomes, monitor disease progression, and guide treatment for patients with MBC. Moreover, the drug resistance problem may be addressed by ctDNA detection. In this review, we summarized the technological developments and clinical applications of ctDNA in MBC.

Clinical significance of gene mutation in ctDNA analysis for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

In this study, we aim to investigate the mutation spectrum of circulating tumor DNA among hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR-MBC) patients using ultradeep targeted resequencing. In addition, we also evaluate the correlation of mutations detected from this study with progression-free survival (PFS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 56 HR-MBC patients were enrolled. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from plasma and sequenced by using Oncomine Breast cancer cfDNA assay in this study.

RESULT

Concentration of cfDNA is correlated with a number of metastatic organs and serum CEA levels (Spearman's rank correlation p = 0.0018, p = 0.0015 respectively). Cases with high cfDNA levels (≥ 2.6 ng/μl of plasma) showed worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared with cases with low cfDNA levels (p = 0.043 and 0.046, respectively). Among these patients, 29 patients (51.7%) have TP53 mutations, 12 patients (30.3%) have PIK3CA mutations, and 9 patients (16.0%) have ESR1 mutations. Acquisition of ESR1 mutation increased according to the lines of hormone therapy. In addition, patients with ESR1 mutation showed shorter PFS than those without mutation (log-rank p = 0.047). In the multivariate analysis, ESR1 mutation and cfDNA concentration were significant for PFS (p = 0.027 and 0.006, respectively). In conclusion, assessment of ESR1 mutation and cfDNA concentration could be useful in predicting prognosis for HR-MBCs.

Clinical Implications of Monitoring ESR1 Mutations by Circulating Tumor DNA in Estrogen Receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

ESR1 mutations are frequently detected in ER+ MBC, and have been reported to be associated with endocrine therapy resistance. However, there are little researches to validate whether dynamic monitoring of ESR1 mutations could serve as a predictive plasma biomarker of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy. Therefore, in this study, we performed longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection to evaluate the clinical implications of monitoring ESR1 mutations.

METHODS

We performed longitudinal dynamic mutation analyses of plasma samples from 45 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and sequencing paired biopsy tissues, using a targeted NGS panel of 425 genes. These patients were treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University between January 2017 and February 2019 with written informed consent.

RESULTS

Mutations profiles were highly concordant between plasma and paired tissue samples from 45 MBC patients (r = 0.96, P < 0.0001). ESR1 mutations were enriched in ER+ MBC patients after AI therapy (17.8%, 8/45). The median time from AI endocrine therapies to the initial detection of ESR1 mutation was 39 months (95% CI 21.32-57.57). Some hotspot mutations (Y537S (n = 5), Y537N (n = 1), D538G (n = 2), E380Q (n = 2)) and several rare mutations (L345SfsX7, 24fs, G344delinsGC) were identified in our cohort. In addition, we observed that two patients obtained multiple ESR1 mutations over the course of treatment (Y537N/Y537S/D538G, L345SfsX7/24fs/E380Q). Through dynamically monitoring ESR1 mutations by ctDNA, we demonstrated that the change of allele frequency of ESR1 mutations was an important biomarker, which could predict endocrine resistance of ER+ MBC in our study. We also observed that the combination of everolimus in four cases with acquired ESR1 mutations showed longer PFS than other therapies without everolimus.

CONCLUSION

The dynamic monitoring of ESR1 mutations by ctDNA is a promising tool to predict endocrine therapy resistance in ER+ MBC patients.

Review ctDNA and Breast Cancer

In only few years, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in breast cancer has moved from purely fundamental research to nearby daily use for treatment selection and drug-resistance assessment. Indeed, technical advances and widespread use of next-generation sequencing or digital PCR allowed for detection of very low amount of tumor DNA in bloodstream. The use of ctDNA as liquid biopsy able either to monitor tumor burden under treatment or to overcome tumor heterogeneity and identify potential targetable drivers. Time has come to define how ctDNA can be implemented for early or metastatic breast cancer management. Data from retrospective analyses of prospective trials have recently highlighted the potential advantages but also the limitations of ctDNA, in particular for patients under endocrine therapy.

Clinical Implications of Monitoring ESR1 Mutations by Circulating Tumor DNA in Estrogen Receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: ESR1 mutations are frequently detected in ER+ MBC, and have been reported to be associated with endocrine therapy resistance. However, there are little researches to validate whether dynamic monitoring of ESR1 mutations could serve as a predictive plasma biomarker of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy. Therefore, in this study, we performed longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection to evaluate the clinical implications of monitoring ESR1 mutations. METHODS: We performed longitudinal dynamic mutation analyses of plasma samples from 45 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and sequencing paired biopsy tissues, using a targeted NGS panel of 425 genes. These patients were treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University between January 2017 and February 2019 with written informed consent. RESULTS: Mutations profiles were highly concordant between plasma and paired tissue samples from 45 MBC patients (r = 0.96, P < 0.0001). ESR1 mutations were enriched in ER+ MBC patients after AI therapy (17.8%, 8/45). The median time from AI endocrine therapies to the initial detection of ESR1 mutation was 39 months (95% CI 21.32–57.57). Some hotspot mutations (Y537S (n = 5), Y537N (n = 1), D538G (n = 2), E380Q (n = 2)) and several rare mutations (L345SfsX7, 24fs, G344delinsGC) were identified in our cohort. In addition, we observed that two patients obtained multiple ESR1 mutations over the course of treatment (Y537N/Y537S/D538G, L345SfsX7/24fs/E380Q). Through dynamically monitoring ESR1 mutations by ctDNA, we demonstrated that the change of allele frequency of ESR1 mutations was an important biomarker, which could predict endocrine resistance of ER+ MBC in our study. We also observed that the combination of everolimus in four cases with acquired ESR1 mutations showed longer PFS than other therapies without everolimus. CONCLUSION: The dynamic monitoring of ESR1 mutations by ctDNA is a promising tool to predict endocrine therapy resistance in ER+ MBC patients.

The Emerging Role of ESR1 Mutations in Luminal Breast Cancer as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker of Response to Endocrine Therapy

Mutations in the hotspot ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor (ER) gene ESR1 have recently been recognized as mechanisms of endocrine resistance in endocrine receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Accumulating data suggest these mutations develop under the selective pressure of endocrine treatments, and are infrequent in untreated ER-positive breast cancers. In vitro studies show that these mutations confer ligand-independent activity, resistance to estrogen deprivation, and relative resistance to tamoxifen and fulvestrant. Post-hoc retrospective and prospective analyses of ESR1 mutations in patients with MBC have consistently found that these mutations are markers of poor prognosis and predict resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs). These results warrant further investigation and prospective validation in dedicated studies. Moreover, studies are ongoing to clarify the activity of novel drugs in the context of metastatic endocrine resistant luminal breast cancer harboring ESR1 mutations. In this review, we summarize the pre-clinical and clinical findings defining the characteristics of ESR1 mutant breast cancer, and highlight the potential clinical developments in this field.

Towards Circulating-Tumor DNA-Based Precision Medicine

In the era of precision medicine, targeted therapies have been implemented for various diseases. Genomic information guides decision-making in cancer treatment. The improvements in next-generation sequencing and polymerase chain reaction have made it possible to access the genetic information using circulating-tumor DNAs (ctDNAs). Molecular characteristics of individual tumors can be obtained by analysis of ctDNAs, thus making them excellent tools to guide decision-making during treatment. In oncology, the use of ctDNAs in clinical practice is now gaining importance. Molecular analysis of ctDNAs has potential for multiple clinical applications, including early diagnosis, prognosis of disease, prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers, and monitoring response to therapy and clonal evolution. In this paper, we highlight the applications of ctDNAs in cancer management, especially in metastatic setting, and summarize recent studies about the use of ctDNAs as predictive biomarkers for the therapeutic adaptation/response in lung cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer. These studies offer the evidence to use ctDNAs as a promising approach to solve unmet clinical needs.

ESR1 mutations in breast cancer

The acquisition of ligand-independent ESR1 mutations during aromatase inhibitor therapy in metastatic estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer is a common mechanism of hormonal therapy resistance. Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that ESR1 mutations can preexist in primary tumors and can be enriched during metastasis. Furthermore, ESR1 mutations express a unique transcriptional profile that favors tumor progression, suggesting that selected ESR1 mutations may influence metastasis. Several groups have used sensitive detection methods using patient liquid biopsies to track ESR1 or truncal somatic mutations to predict treatment outcome and tumor progression, and some of these techniques may eventually be used to guide sequential treatment options in patients. Further development and standardization of mutation tracking in circulating tumor DNA is ongoing. Clinically, patients with ESR1 mutations derive clinical benefit when treated with fulvestrant and CDK4/6-targeted therapies, but the development of more potent selective ER degraders and/or new targeted biotherapies are needed to overcome the endocrine-resistant phenotype of ESR1 mutant-bearing tumors. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of resistance and dissemination of ESR1 mutations as well as the detection methods for ESR1 mutation tracking, newly discovered potential therapeutic targets, and the clinical implications and treatment options for treating patients with ESR1 mutant-bearing tumors.

ESR1 mutations: a new biomarker in breast cancer

Introduction: In hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy. Areas covered: Here, we review currently available data on ESR1 mutations, regarding their functional impact, prevalence at different stages (and according to the material used: tissue-based analysis vs. liquid biopsy), prognostic impact and predictive value of resistance to aromatase inhibitors. Possible strategies to overcome this resistance by using selective estrogen receptor downregulators (such as fulvestrant) are also discussed. Expert opinion: ESR1 mutation detection will probably become a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the future, used in clinical practice for hormone-receptor breast cancer, especially in the metastatic setting. In the future, we should expect to assess ESR1 mutations, using liquid biopsy (by digital-PCR or next-generation sequencing), in the same way as other prognostic or predictive biomarkers, such as EGFR mutations in lung cancer, and possibly even have targeted-therapies against these mutations.

Comparative analysis of diagnostic platforms for measurement of differentially methylated insulin DNA

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been intensively investigated as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for various cancers. In recent years, presence of unmethylated insulin cfDNA in the circulation has been correlated with pancreatic β-cell death and risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Digital (d)PCR is an increasingly popular method of quantifying insulin cfDNA due to its ability to determine absolute copy numbers, and its increased sensitivity when compared to the more routinely used quantitative PCR. Multiple platforms have been developed to carry out dPCR. However, not all technologies perform comparably, thereby necessitating evaluation of each platform. Here, we compare two dPCR platforms: the QuantStudio 3D (QS3D, Applied Biosystems) and the QX200 (Bio-Rad), to measure copies of unmethylated/methylated insulin plasmids. The QS3D detected greater copy numbers of the plasmids than the QX200 (manual mode), whereas QX200 demonstrated minimal replicate variability, increased throughput, ease of use and the potential for automation. Overall, the performance of QX200, in our hands, was better suited to measure differentially methylated insulin cfDNA.

Circulating tumor DNA analysis in breast cancer: Is it ready for prime-time?

Precision Medicine is becoming the new paradigm in healthcare as it enables better resources allocation, treatment optimization with a potential side-effects reduction and consequent impact on quality of life and survival. This revolution is being catalyzed by liquid biopsy technologies, which provide prognostic and predictive information for advanced cancer patients, without the analytical and procedural drawbacks of tissue-biopsy. In particular, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is gaining momentum as a clinically feasible option capable to capture both spatial and temporal tumor heterogeneity. Several techniques are currently available for ctDNA extraction and analysis, each with its preferential case scenarios and preanalytical implications which must be taken into consideration to effectively support clinical decision-making and to better highlight its clinical utility. Aim of this review is to summarize both analytical developments and clinical evidences to offer a comprehensive update on the deployment of ctDNA in breast cancer's (BC) characterization and treatment.

Place des CTC et de l’ADN circulant dans la prise en charge du cancer du sein

Si la présence de cellules tumorales circulantes (CTC) et d’ADN tumoral circulant (ADNtc) est connue de longue date, seuls les progrès technologiques récents ont permis d’évaluer l’intérêt de cette approche dans le cancer du sein. La détection de CTC, tant pour les cancers du sein localisés que métastatiques, est un facteur de mauvais pronostic établi, mais qui ne permet pas de proposer de prise en charge spécifique. L’usage de l’ADNtc nécessite des validations prospectives, mais semble particulièrement prometteur pour la recherche demaladie résiduelle ou l’identification de clones tumoraux porteurs de mutations (PI3KCA,ESR1) permettant de prédire l’efficacité ou la résistance thérapeutique.