1
|
Xu Z, Lin Q, Cai X, Zhong Z, Teng J, Li B, Zeng H, Gao Y, Cai Z, Wang X, Shi L, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Lin Y, Liu S, Yin H, Bai Z, Wei C, Zhou J, Zhang W, Zhang X, Shi S, Wu J, Diao S, Liu Y, Pan X, Feng X, Liu R, Su Z, Chang C, Zhu Q, Wu Y, Zhou Z, Bai L, Li K, Wang Q, Pan Y, Xu Z, Peng X, Mei S, Mo D, Liu X, Zhang H, Yuan X, Liu Y, Liu GE, Su G, Sahana G, Lund MS, Ma L, Xiang R, Shen X, Li P, Huang R, Ballester M, Crespo-Piazuelo D, Amills M, Clop A, Karlskov-Mortensen P, Fredholm M, Tang G, Li M, Li X, Ding X, Li J, Chen Y, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Zhao F, Fang L, Zhang Z. Integrating large-scale meta-GWAS and PigGTEx resources to decipher the genetic basis of 232 complex traits in pigs. Natl Sci Rev 2025; 12:nwaf048. [PMID: 40330097 PMCID: PMC12051865 DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 01/26/2025] [Indexed: 05/08/2025] Open
Abstract
Understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying complex traits in pigs is crucial for enhancing genetic gain via artificial selection and utilizing pigs as models for human disease and biology. Here, we conducted comprehensive genome-wide association studies (GWAS) followed by a cross-breed meta-analysis for 232 complex traits and a within-breed meta-analysis for 12 traits, using 28.3 million imputed sequence variants in 70 328 animals across 14 pig breeds. We identified 6878 quantitative trait loci (QTL) for 139 complex traits. Leveraging the Pig Genotype-Tissue Expression resource, we systematically investigated the biological context and regulatory mechanisms behind these trait-QTLs, ultimately prioritizing 14 829 variant-gene-tissue-trait regulatory circuits. For instance, rs344053754 regulates UGT2B31 expression in the liver and intestines, potentially by modulating enhancer activity, ultimately influencing litter weight at weaning in pigs. Furthermore, we observed conservation of certain genetic and regulatory mechanisms underlying complex traits between humans and pigs. Overall, our cross-breed meta-GWAS in pigs provides invaluable resources and novel insights into the genetic regulatory and evolutionary mechanisms of complex traits in mammals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiting Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Qing Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Xiaodian Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Zhanming Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Jinyan Teng
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Bingjie Li
- Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The Roslin Institute Building, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Haonan Zeng
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Yahui Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (ARS), U.S.Department of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
| | - Zexi Cai
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Xiaoqing Wang
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Liangyu Shi
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Xue Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Yi Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Zipeng Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Yu Lin
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
| | - Shuli Liu
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou 310024, China
| | - Hongwei Yin
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China
| | - Zhonghao Bai
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Chen Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Jun Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Wenjing Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Xiaoke Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Shaolei Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Jun Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Shuqi Diao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Yuqiang Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Xiangchun Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Xueyan Feng
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Ruiqi Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Zhanqin Su
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Chengjie Chang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Qianghui Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Yuwei Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | | | - Zhongyin Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China
| | - Lijing Bai
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China
| | - Kui Li
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China
| | - Qishan Wang
- Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Yuchun Pan
- Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Zhong Xu
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo and Molecular Breeding, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Hubei Provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
| | - Xianwen Peng
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo and Molecular Breeding, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Hubei Provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
| | - Shuqi Mei
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo and Molecular Breeding, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Hubei Provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
| | - Delin Mo
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Xiaolong Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Yang Liu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - George E Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (ARS), U.S.Department of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
| | - Guosheng Su
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Goutam Sahana
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Mogens Sandø Lund
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
| | - Ruidong Xiang
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Xia Shen
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
- Center for Intelligent Medicine Research, Greater Bay Area Institute of Precision Medicine (Guangzhou), Fudan University, Guangzhou 510000, China
- Centre for Global Health Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Pinghua Li
- Institute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Key Laboratory in Nanjing for Evaluation and Utilization of Livestock and Poultry (Pigs) Resources, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Ruihua Huang
- Institute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Key Laboratory in Nanjing for Evaluation and Utilization of Livestock and Poultry (Pigs) Resources, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Maria Ballester
- Animal Breeding and Genetics Programme, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon, Caldes de Montbui 08140, Spain
| | - Daniel Crespo-Piazuelo
- Animal Breeding and Genetics Programme, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon, Caldes de Montbui 08140, Spain
| | - Marcel Amills
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
- Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
| | - Alex Clop
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
| | - Peter Karlskov-Mortensen
- Animal Genetics and Breeding, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark
| | - Merete Fredholm
- Animal Genetics and Breeding, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark
| | - Guoqing Tang
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
| | - Mingzhou Li
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
| | - Xuewei Li
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
| | - Xiangdong Ding
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Jiaqi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| | - Yaosheng Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
| | - Qin Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China
| | - Yunxiang Zhao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
| | - Fuping Zhao
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Lingzhao Fang
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Zhe Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Charles M, Gaiani N, Sanchez MP, Boussaha M, Hozé C, Boichard D, Rocha D, Boulling A. Functional impact of splicing variants in the elaboration of complex traits in cattle. Nat Commun 2025; 16:3893. [PMID: 40274775 PMCID: PMC12022281 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58970-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025] Open
Abstract
GWAS conducted directly on imputed whole genome sequence have led to the identification of numerous genetic variants associated with agronomic traits in cattle. However, such variants are often simply markers in linkage disequilibrium with the actual causal variants, which is a limiting factor for the development of accurate genomic predictions. It is possible to identify causal variants by integrating information on how variants impact gene expression into GWAS output. RNA splicing plays a major role in regulating gene expression. Thus, assessing the effect of variants on RNA splicing may explain their function. Here, we use a high-throughput strategy to functionally analyse putative splice-disrupting variants in the bovine genome. Using GWAS, massively parallel reporter assay and deep learning algorithms designed to predict splice-disrupting variants, we identify 38 splice-disrupting variants associated with complex traits in cattle, three of which could be classified as causal. Our results indicate that splice-disrupting variants are widely found in the quantitative trait loci related to these phenotypes. Using our combined approach, we also assess the validity of splicing predictors originally developed to analyse human variants in the context of the bovine genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Charles
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
- INRAE, SIGENAE, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Nicolas Gaiani
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Marie-Pierre Sanchez
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Mekki Boussaha
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Chris Hozé
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
- ELIANCE, 75012, Paris, France
| | - Didier Boichard
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Dominique Rocha
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Arnaud Boulling
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meng Z, Chu M, Yang H, Zhang S, Wang Q, Chen J, Ren C, Pan Z, Zhang Z. Regulatory element map of sheep reproductive tissues: functional annotation of tissue-specific strong active enhancers. Front Vet Sci 2025; 12:1564148. [PMID: 40308692 PMCID: PMC12040938 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1564148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2025] [Accepted: 04/01/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction Comprehensive functional annotation of the genome is crucial for elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying complex traits and diseases. Although functional annotation has been partially completed in sheep, a systematic annotation focused on reproductive tissues remains absent. Methods In this study, we integrated 60 transcriptomic and epigenomic datasets from five reproductive tissues. Using a multi-omics approach, we predicted 15 distinct chromatin states and conducted thorough functional annotation. Results We established the first regulatory element atlas for sheep reproductive tissues and examined the roles of these elements in reproductive traits and disease. In total, we annotated 1,680,172 regulatory elements, including 83,980 tissue-specific strong active enhancers (EnhAs). Discussion Enhancers were identified as critical drivers of tissue-specific functions, operating through sequence-specific transcription factor binding and direct regulation of target genes. Key transcription factors associated with reproductive function included INHBA (ovary), KITLG (oviduct), Snai2 (cervix), WNT7A (uterine horn), FOLR1 (uterine body), and SALL1 (shared uterine regions). Additionally, our findings support the potential of sheep as a promising model for investigating embryonic development and miscarriage. This work lays a theoretical foundation for future research into the molecular mechanisms of complex traits and diseases in sheep.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhu Meng
- Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Germplasm Innovation of Local Livestock, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Mingxing Chu
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shiwen Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qiangjun Wang
- Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Germplasm Innovation of Local Livestock, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
| | - Jiahong Chen
- Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Germplasm Innovation of Local Livestock, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
| | - Chunhuan Ren
- Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Germplasm Innovation of Local Livestock, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
| | - Zhangyuan Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya, China
| | - Zijun Zhang
- Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Germplasm Innovation of Local Livestock, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fang L, Teng J, Lin Q, Bai Z, Liu S, Guan D, Li B, Gao Y, Hou Y, Gong M, Pan Z, Yu Y, Clark EL, Smith J, Rawlik K, Xiang R, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, Littlejohn M, Larson G, MacHugh DE, O'Grady JF, Sørensen P, Sahana G, Lund MS, Jiang Z, Pan X, Gong W, Zhang H, He X, Zhang Y, Gao N, He J, Yi G, Liu Y, Tang Z, Zhao P, Zhou Y, Fu L, Wang X, Hao D, Liu L, Chen S, Young RS, Shen X, Xia C, Cheng H, Ma L, Cole JB, Baldwin RL, Li CJ, Van Tassell CP, Rosen BD, Bhowmik N, Lunney J, Liu W, Guan L, Zhao X, Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Luo Y, Lin L, Canela-Xandri O, Derks MFL, Crooijmans RPMA, Gòdia M, Madsen O, Groenen MAM, Koltes JE, Tuggle CK, McCarthy FM, Rocha D, Giuffra E, Amills M, Clop A, Ballester M, Tosser-Klopp G, Li J, Fang C, Fang M, Wang Q, Hou Z, Wang Q, Zhao F, Jiang L, Zhao G, Zhou Z, Zhou R, Liu H, Deng J, Jin L, Li M, Mo D, Liu X, Chen Y, Yuan X, Li J, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Ding X, Sun D, et alFang L, Teng J, Lin Q, Bai Z, Liu S, Guan D, Li B, Gao Y, Hou Y, Gong M, Pan Z, Yu Y, Clark EL, Smith J, Rawlik K, Xiang R, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, Littlejohn M, Larson G, MacHugh DE, O'Grady JF, Sørensen P, Sahana G, Lund MS, Jiang Z, Pan X, Gong W, Zhang H, He X, Zhang Y, Gao N, He J, Yi G, Liu Y, Tang Z, Zhao P, Zhou Y, Fu L, Wang X, Hao D, Liu L, Chen S, Young RS, Shen X, Xia C, Cheng H, Ma L, Cole JB, Baldwin RL, Li CJ, Van Tassell CP, Rosen BD, Bhowmik N, Lunney J, Liu W, Guan L, Zhao X, Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Luo Y, Lin L, Canela-Xandri O, Derks MFL, Crooijmans RPMA, Gòdia M, Madsen O, Groenen MAM, Koltes JE, Tuggle CK, McCarthy FM, Rocha D, Giuffra E, Amills M, Clop A, Ballester M, Tosser-Klopp G, Li J, Fang C, Fang M, Wang Q, Hou Z, Wang Q, Zhao F, Jiang L, Zhao G, Zhou Z, Zhou R, Liu H, Deng J, Jin L, Li M, Mo D, Liu X, Chen Y, Yuan X, Li J, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Ding X, Sun D, Sun HZ, Li C, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Wu D, Wang W, Fan X, Zhang Q, Li K, Zhang H, Yang N, Hu X, Huang W, Song J, Wu Y, Yang J, Wu W, Kasper C, Liu X, Yu X, Cui L, Zhou X, Kim S, Li W, Im HK, Buckler ES, Ren B, Schatz MC, Li JJ, Palmer AA, Frantz L, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Liu GE. The Farm Animal Genotype-Tissue Expression (FarmGTEx) Project. Nat Genet 2025; 57:786-796. [PMID: 40097783 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-025-02121-5] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
Genetic mutation and drift, coupled with natural and human-mediated selection and migration, have produced a wide variety of genotypes and phenotypes in farmed animals. We here introduce the Farm Animal Genotype-Tissue Expression (FarmGTEx) Project, which aims to elucidate the genetic determinants of gene expression across 16 terrestrial and aquatic domestic species under diverse biological and environmental contexts. For each species, we aim to collect multiomics data, particularly genomics and transcriptomics, from 50 tissues of 1,000 healthy adults and 200 additional animals representing a specific context. This Perspective provides an overview of the priorities of FarmGTEx and advocates for coordinated strategies of data analysis and resource-sharing initiatives. FarmGTEx aims to serve as a platform for investigating context-specific regulatory effects, which will deepen our understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying complex phenotypes. The knowledge and insights provided by FarmGTEx will contribute to improving sustainable agriculture-based food systems, comparative biology and eventual human biomedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingzhao Fang
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Jinyan Teng
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Lin
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhonghao Bai
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Shuli Liu
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Bingjie Li
- Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College, Midlothian, UK
| | - Yahui Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yali Hou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Mian Gong
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhangyuan Pan
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Yu
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Emily L Clark
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, UK
| | - Jacqueline Smith
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, UK
| | - Konrad Rawlik
- Baillie Gifford Pandemic Science Hub, Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ruidong Xiang
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- Cambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amanda J Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael E Goddard
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mathew Littlejohn
- Research and Development, Livestock Improvement Corporation, Hamilton, New Zealand
- AL Rae Centre for Genetics and Breeding, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Greger Larson
- The Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David E MacHugh
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD One Health Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John F O'Grady
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Sørensen
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Goutam Sahana
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mogens Sandø Lund
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Zhihua Jiang
- Department of Animal Sciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Xiangchun Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wentao Gong
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haihan Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Xi He
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Yuebo Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Ning Gao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Jun He
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Guoqiang Yi
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yuwen Liu
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhonglin Tang
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Pengju Zhao
- Hainan Institute, Zhejiang University, Yongyou Industry Park, Yazhou Bay Sci-Tech City, Sanya, China
| | - Yang Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
- Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China
| | - Liangliang Fu
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Dan Hao
- Poultry Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China
| | - Siqian Chen
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Robert S Young
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Zhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute, Zhejiang University, Haining, P. R. China
| | - Xia Shen
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Center for Evolutionary Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Center for Intelligent Medicine Research, Greater Bay Area Institute of Precision Medicine (Guangzhou), Fudan University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charley Xia
- Lothian Birth Cohort studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hao Cheng
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - John B Cole
- Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding, Bowie, MD, USA
- Department of Animal Sciences, Donald Henry Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program and the Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Ransom L Baldwin
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Cong-Jun Li
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Curtis P Van Tassell
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Benjamin D Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Nayan Bhowmik
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Joan Lunney
- Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, BARC, NEA, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Wansheng Liu
- Department of Animal Science, Center for Reproductive Biology and Health, College of Agricultural Sciences, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Leluo Guan
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Xin Zhao
- Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada
| | - Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu
- Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yonglun Luo
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lin Lin
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Oriol Canela-Xandri
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martijn F L Derks
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marta Gòdia
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ole Madsen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Martien A M Groenen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - James E Koltes
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | | | | | - Dominique Rocha
- GABI, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Paris-Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Elisabetta Giuffra
- GABI, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Paris-Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Marcel Amills
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Alex Clop
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Ballester
- Animal Breeding and Genetics Programme, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon, Caldes de Montbui, Spain
| | | | - Jing Li
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kunming University, Kunming, China
| | - Chao Fang
- LC-Bio Technologies, Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming Fang
- Key Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Jimei University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qishan Wang
- College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhuocheng Hou
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Qin Wang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Fuping Zhao
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Jiang
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Guiping Zhao
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengkui Zhou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Zhou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hehe Liu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Deng
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Long Jin
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingzhou Li
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Delin Mo
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaosheng Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaolong Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiaqi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuhong Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
- Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangdong Ding
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Dongxiao Sun
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui-Zeng Sun
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Cow Genetic Improvement and Milk Quality Research of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Cong Li
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Yu Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Yu Jiang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Dongdong Wu
- Key Laboratory of Genetic Evolution and Animal Models, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Wenwen Wang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Xinzhong Fan
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Qin Zhang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Kui Li
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Yang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoxiang Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Huang
- Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Jiuzhou Song
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Yang Wu
- Institute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiwei Wu
- Institute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Ürümqi City, China
| | - Claudia Kasper
- Animal GenoPhenomics, Animal Production Systems and Animal Health, Agroscope Posieux, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Xinfeng Liu
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystem, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaofei Yu
- College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
| | - Leilei Cui
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Aging and Disease, Human Aging Research Institute and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiang Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Seyoung Kim
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Wei Li
- Division of Computational Biomedicine, Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Hae Kyung Im
- Department of Medicine and Human Genetics, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edward S Buckler
- Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Bing Ren
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Center for Epigenomics, Moores Cancer Center and Institute of Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Michael C Schatz
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jingyi Jessica Li
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Abraham A Palmer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - Laurent Frantz
- Palaeogenomics Group, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
| | - Zhe Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - George E Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
O'Grady JF, McHugo GP, Ward JA, Hall TJ, Faherty O'Donnell SL, Correia CN, Browne JA, McDonald M, Gormley E, Riggio V, Prendergast JGD, Clark EL, Pausch H, Meade KG, Gormley IC, Gordon SV, MacHugh DE. Integrative genomics sheds light on the immunogenetics of tuberculosis in cattle. Commun Biol 2025; 8:479. [PMID: 40128580 PMCID: PMC11933339 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07846-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2025] [Indexed: 03/26/2025] Open
Abstract
Mycobacterium bovis causes bovine tuberculosis (bTB), an infectious disease of cattle that represents a zoonotic threat to humans. Research has shown that the peripheral blood (PB) transcriptome is perturbed during bTB disease but the genomic architecture underpinning this transcriptional response remains poorly understood. Here, we analyse PB transcriptomics data from 63 control and 60 confirmed M. bovis-infected animals and detect 2592 differently expressed genes perturbing multiple immune response pathways. Leveraging imputed genome-wide SNP data, we characterise thousands of cis-expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and show that the PB transcriptome is substantially impacted by intrapopulation genomic variation during M. bovis infection. Integrating our cis-eQTL data with bTB susceptibility GWAS summary statistics, we perform a transcriptome-wide association study and identify 115 functionally relevant genes (including RGS10, GBP4, TREML2, and RELT) and provide important new omics data for understanding the host response to mycobacterial infections that cause tuberculosis in mammals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F O'Grady
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - Gillian P McHugo
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - James A Ward
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - Thomas J Hall
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - Sarah L Faherty O'Donnell
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
- Irish Blood Transfusion Service, National Blood Centre, James's Street, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Carolina N Correia
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
- Children's Health Ireland, 32 James's Walk, Rialto, Ireland
| | - John A Browne
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - Michael McDonald
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - Eamonn Gormley
- UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
- UCD One Health Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - Valentina Riggio
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH), Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| | - James G D Prendergast
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH), Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| | - Emily L Clark
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH), Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| | - Hubert Pausch
- Animal Genomics, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 2, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kieran G Meade
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
- UCD One Health Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
- UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - Isobel C Gormley
- UCD School of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - Stephen V Gordon
- UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
- UCD One Health Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
- UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland
| | - David E MacHugh
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.
- UCD One Health Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.
- UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tao Q, Huang A, Qi J, Yang Z, Guo S, Lu Y, He X, Han X, Jiang S, Xu M, Bai Y, Zhang T, Hu S, Li L, Bai L, Liu H. An mRNA expression atlas for the duck with public RNA-seq datasets. BMC Genomics 2025; 26:268. [PMID: 40102741 PMCID: PMC11916966 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11385-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ducks are globally important poultry species and a major source of farm animal products, including meat, eggs, and feathers. A thorough understanding of the functional genomic and transcriptomic sequences is crucial for improving production efficiency. RESULT This study constructed the largest duck mRNA expression atlas among all waterfowl species to date. The atlas encompasses 1,257 tissue samples across 30 tissue types, representing all major organ systems. Using advanced clustering analysis, we established co-expression network clusters to describe the transcriptional features in the duck mRNA expression atlas and, when feasible, assign these features to unique tissue types or pathways. Additionally, we identified 27 low-variance, highly expressed housekeeping genes suitable for gene expression experiments. Furthermore, in-depth analysis revealed potential sex-biased gene expression patterns within tissues and specific gene expression profiles in meat-type and egg-type ducks, providing valuable resources to understand the genetic basis of sex differences and particular phenotypes. This research elucidates the biological processes affecting duck productivity. CONCLUSION This study presents the most extensive gene expression atlas for any waterfowl species to date. These findings are of significant value for advancing duck biological research and industrial applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuyu Tao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Anqi Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Jingjing Qi
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Zhao Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Shihao Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Yinjuan Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Xinxin He
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Xu Han
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Shuaixue Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Mengru Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Yuan Bai
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Tao Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Shenqiang Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Liang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - Lili Bai
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China
| | - HeHe Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China.
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mukiibi R, Ferraresso S, Franch R, Peruzza L, Dalla Rovere G, Babbucci M, Bertotto D, Toffan A, Pascoli F, Faggion S, Peñaloza C, Tsigenopoulos CS, Houston RD, Bargelloni L, Robledo D. Integrated functional genomic analysis identifies regulatory variants underlying a major QTL for disease resistance in European sea bass. BMC Biol 2025; 23:75. [PMID: 40069747 PMCID: PMC11899128 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02180-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2025] [Indexed: 03/14/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Viral nervous necrosis (VNN) is an important viral disease threatening global aquaculture sustainability and affecting over 50 farmed and ecologically important fish species. A major QTL for resistance to VNN has been previously detected in European sea bass, but the underlying causal gene(s) and mutation(s) remain unknown. To identify the mechanisms and genetic factors underpinning resistance to VNN in European sea bass, we employed integrative analyses of multiple functional genomics assays in European sea bass. RESULTS The estimated heritability of VNN resistance was high (h2 ~ 0.40), and a major QTL explaining up to 38% of the genetic variance of the trait was confirmed on chromosome 3, with individuals with the resistant QTL genotype showing a 90% survivability against a VNN outbreak. Whole-genome resequencing analyses narrowed the location of this QTL to a small region containing 4 copies of interferon alpha inducible protein 27-like 2A (IFI27L2A) genes, and one copy of the interferon alpha inducible protein 27-like 2 (IFI27L2) gene. RNA sequencing revealed a clear association between the QTL genotype and the expression of two of the IFI27L2A genes, and the IFI27L2 gene. Integration with chromatin accessibility and histone modification data pinpointed two SNPs in active regulatory regions of two of these genes (IFI27L2A and IFI27L2), and transcription factor binding site gains for the resistant alleles were predicted. These alleles, particularly the SNP variant CHR3:10,077,301, exhibited higher frequencies (0.55 to 0.77) in Eastern Mediterranean Sea bass populations, which show considerably higher levels of resistance to VNN, as compared to susceptible West Mediterranean and Atlantic populations (0.15-0.25). CONCLUSIONS The SNP variant CHR3:10,077,301, through modulation of IFI27L2 and IFI27L2A genes, is likely the causative mutation underlying resistance to VNN in European sea bass. This is one of the first causative mutations discovered for disease resistance traits in fish and paves the way for marker-assisted selection as well as biotechnological approaches to enhance resistance to VNN in European sea bass and other susceptible species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Mukiibi
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Serena Ferraresso
- Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Rafaella Franch
- Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Luca Peruzza
- Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Giulia Dalla Rovere
- Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Babbucci
- Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Daniela Bertotto
- Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Anna Toffan
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, National Reference Laboratory for Fish Diseases, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Francesco Pascoli
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, National Reference Laboratory for Fish Diseases, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Sara Faggion
- Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Carolina Peñaloza
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
- Benchmark Genetics, Roslin Innovation Centre, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Costas S Tsigenopoulos
- Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture (IMBBC), Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Heraklion, 715 00, Greece
| | - Ross D Houston
- Benchmark Genetics, Roslin Innovation Centre, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Luca Bargelloni
- Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy.
| | - Diego Robledo
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
- Department of Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tardieu L, Driscoll MA, Jones KR. Neo-tropical species production: a sustainable strategy for climate change adaptation in neo-tropical regions. BMC Vet Res 2025; 21:134. [PMID: 40025469 PMCID: PMC11874856 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-025-04558-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/04/2025] Open
Abstract
This opinion piece clarifies the impact of climate change on animal production in the Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) region and proposes a sustainable solution. Anthropogenic climate change has resulted in higher ambient temperatures, rainfall, humidity, storms and desertification. These events have direct and indirect effects on conventional animal performance and this piece will highlight the impact of increased temperatures on their welfare, health and production in the LAC. Alternative species such as neo-tropical wildlife animals have been proposed as climate resilient animals for use in the LAC, as they are well adapted to the climate and environment in the tropics. Some of these animals include capybara, lappe, agouti, caiman, cocrico and collared peccary. Neo-tropical animal production has the potential to produce nutritious meat, quality leather, reduce pollution and serve as a form of sustainable production. These animals can be inserted into a sustainable production system as their feed resources can be supplied through the use of local feedstuff, they also require less water and energy for maintenance, as they are well adapted to the high temperature and humidity in comparison to domesticated animals such as cattle, pigs and chickens. Finally, the key challenges including the legal use of the animals throughout the year, lack of technical experience and limited knowledge on the biology of these animals are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Tardieu
- Department of Food Production, Faculty of Food and Agriculture, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Eastern Main Road, St. Augustine, West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.
| | - Marc A Driscoll
- Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Eastern Main Road, St. Augustine, West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Kegan R Jones
- Department of Basic Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Eastern Main Road, St. Augustine, West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Khan N, Li Z, Ali A, Quan B, Kang J, Ullah M, Yin XJ, Shafiq M. Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of myostatin-knockout pigs: insights into muscle growth and lipid metabolism. Transgenic Res 2025; 34:12. [PMID: 39979478 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-025-00431-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025]
Abstract
Pigs are a vital source of protein worldwide, contributing approximately 43% of global meat production. Recent genetic advancements in the myostatin (MSTN) gene have facilitated the development of double-muscling traits in livestock. In this study, we investigate the transcriptomic profiles of second-generation MSTN-knockout (MSTN-/-) pigs, generated through CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Using RNA sequencing, we compared the transcriptomic landscapes of muscle tissues from MSTN-/- pigs and wild-type (WT) counterparts. The sequencing yielded an average unique read mapping rate of 86.7% to the Sus scrofa reference genome. Our analysis revealed 15,142 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 121 novel genes, with 2554 genes upregulated and 1629 downregulated in the MSTN-/- group relative to the wild-type group. Notable transcriptomic changes were identified in genes associated with muscle development, lipid metabolism, and other physiological processes. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular consequences of MSTN inactivation, with potential applications in the optimization of livestock breeding and advancements in biomedical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasar Khan
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Transgenic Animal and Embryo Engineering, Department of Animal Science, Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin, 133002, China
| | - Zhouyan Li
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Transgenic Animal and Embryo Engineering, Department of Animal Science, Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin, 133002, China
| | - Akbar Ali
- School of Life Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China
| | - Biaohu Quan
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Transgenic Animal and Embryo Engineering, Department of Animal Science, Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin, 133002, China
| | - Jindan Kang
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Transgenic Animal and Embryo Engineering, Department of Animal Science, Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin, 133002, China
| | - Munib Ullah
- Department of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan
| | - Xi-Jun Yin
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Transgenic Animal and Embryo Engineering, Department of Animal Science, Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin, 133002, China.
| | - Muhammad Shafiq
- Research Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Banerjee P, de Lima AO, Nguyen LT, Diniz WJS. Editorial: Advances and trends in gene expression, regulation, and phenotypic variation in livestock science: a comprehensive review of methods and technologies. Front Genet 2025; 16:1565301. [PMID: 40018644 PMCID: PMC11865203 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1565301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2025] [Accepted: 01/28/2025] [Indexed: 03/01/2025] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Banerjee
- Department of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | | | - Loan T. Nguyen
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhou H, Clark E, Guan D, Lagarrigue S, Fang L, Cheng H, Tuggle CK, Kapoor M, Wang Y, Giuffra E, Egidy G. Comparative Genomics and Epigenomics of Transcriptional Regulation. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2025; 13:73-98. [PMID: 39565835 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-111523-102217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
Transcriptional regulation in response to diverse physiological cues involves complicated biological processes. Recent initiatives that leverage whole genome sequencing and annotation of regulatory elements significantly contribute to our understanding of transcriptional gene regulation. Advances in the data sets available for comparative genomics and epigenomics can identify evolutionarily constrained regulatory variants and shed light on noncoding elements that influence transcription in different tissues and developmental stages across species. Most epigenomic data, however, are generated from healthy subjects at specific developmental stages. To bridge the genotype-phenotype gap, future research should focus on generating multidimensional epigenomic data under diverse physiological conditions. Farm animal species offer advantages in terms of feasibility, cost, and experimental design for such integrative analyses in comparison to humans. Deep learning modeling and cutting-edge technologies in sequencing and functional screening and validation also provide great promise for better understanding transcriptional regulation in this dynamic field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA; , , ,
| | - Emily Clark
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom;
| | - Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA; , , ,
| | | | - Lingzhao Fang
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark;
| | - Hao Cheng
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA; , , ,
| | | | - Muskan Kapoor
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA; ,
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA; , , ,
| | | | - Giorgia Egidy
- GABI, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Jouy-en-Josas, France; ,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhao Z, Niu Q, Wu J, Wu T, Xie X, Wang Z, Zhang L, Gao H, Gao X, Xu L, Zhu B, Li J. Integrating multi-layered biological priors to improve genomic prediction accuracy in beef cattle. Biol Direct 2024; 19:147. [PMID: 39741345 DOI: 10.1186/s13062-024-00574-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/02/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrating multi-layered information can enhance the accuracy of genomic prediction for complex traits. However, the improvement and application of effective strategies for genomic prediction (GP) using multi-omics data remains challenging. METHODS We generated 11 feature sets for sequencing variants from genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and epigenetics data in beef cattle, then we assessed the contribution of functional variants using genomic restricted maximum likelihood (GREML). We next estimated and ranked variant scores for 43 economically important traits, and compared the prediction accuracy of the top and bottom sets using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and BayesB model. In addition, we annotated the variants from GWAS with functional feature sets and performed enrichment analysis. RESULTS We observed significant enrichments for 32 functional categories in 11 feature sets. The evolutionary related sets (conservation regions and selection signatures) contributed significantly to heritability (31.78-fold and 14.48-fold enrichment), while metabolomics and transcriptomics showed low heritability enrichments. We observed a significant increase in prediction accuracy using the top feature set variants compared to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. The prediction accuracy based on the top 10% variant set showed an average increase of 11.6% and 7.54% using BayesB and GBLUP across traits, respectively. Notably, the greatest increase of 31.52% was obtained for spleen weight (SW) using BayesB. Also, we found that the top 10% of variants show strong enrichment with weight related QTLs based on the Cattle QTL database. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that integrating biological prior information from multiple layers can enhance our understanding of the genetic architecture underlying complex traits and further improve genomic prediction in beef cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhida Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Qunhao Niu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Jiayuan Wu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Tianyi Wu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Xueyuan Xie
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Zezhao Wang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Lupei Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Huijiang Gao
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Xue Gao
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Lingyang Xu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
| | - Bo Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
- Northern Agriculture and Livestock Husbandry Technology Innovation Center, Hohhot, 010010, China.
| | - Junya Li
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kapoor M, Ventura ES, Walsh A, Sokolov A, George N, Kumari S, Provart NJ, Cole B, Libault M, Tickle T, Warren WC, Koltes JE, Papatheodorou I, Ware D, Harrison PW, Elsik C, Yordanova G, Burdett T, Tuggle CK. Building a FAIR data ecosystem for incorporating single-cell transcriptomics data into agricultural genome to phenome research. Front Genet 2024; 15:1460351. [PMID: 39678381 PMCID: PMC11638175 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1460351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 12/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The agriculture genomics community has numerous data submission standards available, but the standards for describing and storing single-cell (SC, e.g., scRNA- seq) data are comparatively underdeveloped. Methods To bridge this gap, we leveraged recent advancements in human genomics infrastructure, such as the integration of the Human Cell Atlas Data Portal with Terra, a secure, scalable, open-source platform for biomedical researchers to access data, run analysis tools, and collaborate. In parallel, the Single Cell Expression Atlas at EMBL-EBI offers a comprehensive data ingestion portal for high-throughput sequencing datasets, including plants, protists, and animals (including humans). Developing data tools connecting these resources would offer significant advantages to the agricultural genomics community. The FAANG data portal at EMBL-EBI emphasizes delivering rich metadata and highly accurate and reliable annotation of farmed animals but is not computationally linked to either of these resources. Results Herein, we describe a pilot-scale project that determines whether the current FAANG metadata standards for livestock can be used to ingest scRNA-seq datasets into Terra in a manner consistent with HCA Data Portal standards. Importantly, rich scRNA-seq metadata can now be brokered through the FAANG data portal using a semi-automated process, thereby avoiding the need for substantial expert curation. We have further extended the functionality of this tool so that validated and ingested SC files within the HCA Data Portal are transferred to Terra for further analysis. In addition, we verified data ingestion into Terra, hosted on Azure, and demonstrated the use of a workflow to analyze the first ingested porcine scRNA-seq dataset. Additionally, we have also developed prototype tools to visualize the output of scRNA-seq analyses on genome browsers to compare gene expression patterns across tissues and cell populations. This JBrowse tool now features distinct tracks, showcasing PBMC scRNA-seq alongside two bulk RNA-seq experiments. Discussion We intend to further build upon these existing tools to construct a scientist-friendly data resource and analytical ecosystem based on Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) SC principles to facilitate SC-level genomic analysis through data ingestion, storage, retrieval, re-use, visualization, and comparative annotation across agricultural species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muskan Kapoor
- Department of Animal Science, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
| | - Enrique Sapena Ventura
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Walsh
- Animal Science Research Center, Division of Animal Science and Division of Plant Science and Technology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Alexey Sokolov
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Nancy George
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Sunita Kumari
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States
| | - Nicholas J. Provart
- Department of Cell and Systems Biology/Centre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Benjamin Cole
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, DOE-Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | - Marc Libault
- Plant Science and Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Timothy Tickle
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Data Sciences Platform, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Wesley C. Warren
- Division of Animal Science, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - James E. Koltes
- Department of Animal Science, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
| | - Irene Papatheodorou
- Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
- Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Doreen Ware
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, NEA Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Peter W. Harrison
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Christine Elsik
- Animal Science Research Center, Division of Animal Science and Division of Plant Science and Technology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Galabina Yordanova
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Tony Burdett
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher K. Tuggle
- Department of Animal Science, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Banerjee P, Diniz WJS. Advancing Dairy and Beef Genetics Through Genomic Technologies. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2024; 40:447-458. [PMID: 39181791 DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2024.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The US beef and dairy industries have made remarkable advances in sustainability and productivity through technological advancements, including selective breeding. Yet, challenges persist due to the complex nature of quantitative traits. While the beef industry has progressed in adopting genomic technologies, the availability of phenotypic data remains an obstacle. To meet the need for sustainable production systems, novel traits are being targeted for selection. Additionally, emerging approaches such as genome editing and high-throughput phenotyping hold promise for further genetic progress. Future research should address the challenges of translating functional genomic findings into practical applications, while simultaneously harnessing analytical methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Banerjee
- Department of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | - Wellison J S Diniz
- Department of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Deng D, Wang H, Han K, Tang Z, Li X, Liu X, Liu X, Li X, Yu M. A genome-wide association study reveals candidate genes and regulatory regions associated with birth weight in pigs. Anim Genet 2024; 55:761-765. [PMID: 39136303 DOI: 10.1111/age.13468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024]
Abstract
Piglet birth weight is associated with preweaning survival, and its related traits have been included in the breeding program. Thus, understanding its genetic basis is essential. This study identified four birth weight-associated genomic regions on chromosomes 2, 4, 5, and 7 through genome-wide association study analysis in 7286 pigs from three different pure breeds using the FarmCPU model. The genetic and phenotypic variance explained by the four candidate regions is 8.42% and 1.85%, respectively. Twenty-eight candidate genes were detected, of which APPL2, TGFBI, MACROH2A1, and SEC22B have been reported to affect body growth or development. In addition, 21 H3K4me3-enriched peaks overlapped with the birth weight-associated genomic regions were identified by integrating the genome-wide association study results with our previous ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data generated in the pig placenta, a fetal organ relevant to birth weight, and three of the regulatory regions influence TGFBI, MACROH2A1, and SEC22B expression. This study provides new insights into understanding the mechanisms for birth weight. Further investigating the variants in the regulatory regions would help identify the functional variants for birth weight in pigs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dadong Deng
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Hongtao Wang
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Kun Han
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhenshuang Tang
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoping Li
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiangdong Liu
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaolei Liu
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinyun Li
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, China
| | - Mei Yu
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chen S, Jiang J, Liang W, Tang Y, Lyu R, Hu Y, Cai D, Luo X, Sun M. Comprehensive Annotation and Expression Profiling of C2H2 Zinc Finger Transcription Factors across Chicken Tissues. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:10525. [PMID: 39408854 PMCID: PMC11476951 DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Revised: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/28/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
As the most abundant class of transcription factors in eukaryotes, C2H2-type zinc finger proteins (C2H2-ZFPs) play critical roles in various biological processes. Despite being extensively studied in mammals, C2H2-ZFPs remain poorly characterized in birds. Recent accumulation of multi-omics data for chicken enables the genome-wide investigation of C2H2-ZFPs in birds. The purpose of this study is to reveal the genomic occurrence and evolutionary signature of chicken C2H2-ZFPs, and further depict their expression profiles across diverse chicken tissues. Here, we annotated 301 C2H2-ZFPs in chicken genome, which are associated with different effector domains, including KRAB, BTB, HOMEO, PHD, SCAN, and SET. Among them, most KRAB-ZFPs lack orthologues in mammals and tend to form clusters by duplication, supporting their fast evolution in chicken. We also annotated a unique and previously unidentified SCAN-ZFP, which is lineage-specific and highly expressed in ovary and testis. By integrating 101 RNA-seq datasets for 32 tissues, we found that most C2H2-ZFPs have tissue-specific expression. Particularly, 74 C2H2-ZFPs-including 27 KRAB-ZFPs-show blastoderm-enriched expression, indicating their association with early embryo development. Overall, this study performs comprehensive annotation and expression profiling of C2H2 ZFPs in diverse chicken tissues, which gives new insights into the evolution and potential function of C2H2-ZFPs in avian species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Chen
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Jiayao Jiang
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Wenxiu Liang
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Yuchen Tang
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Renzhe Lyu
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Yun Hu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (Y.H.); (D.C.)
| | - Demin Cai
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (Y.H.); (D.C.)
| | - Xugang Luo
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (Y.H.); (D.C.)
| | - Mingan Sun
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonosis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety of Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N. An overview of recent technological developments in bovine genomics. Vet Anim Sci 2024; 25:100382. [PMID: 39166173 PMCID: PMC11334705 DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Cattle are regarded as highly valuable animals because of their milk, beef, dung, fur, and ability to draft. The scientific community has tried a number of strategies to improve the genetic makeup of bovine germplasm. To ensure higher returns for the dairy and beef industries, researchers face their greatest challenge in improving commercially important traits. One of the biggest developments in the last few decades in the creation of instruments for cattle genetic improvement is the discovery of the genome. Breeding livestock is being revolutionized by genomic selection made possible by the availability of medium- and high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays coupled with sophisticated statistical techniques. It is becoming easier to access high-dimensional genomic data in cattle. Continuously declining genotyping costs and an increase in services that use genomic data to increase return on investment have both made a significant contribution to this. The field of genomics has come a long way thanks to groundbreaking discoveries such as radiation-hybrid mapping, in situ hybridization, synteny analysis, somatic cell genetics, cytogenetic maps, molecular markers, association studies for quantitative trait loci, high-throughput SNP genotyping, whole-genome shotgun sequencing to whole-genome mapping, and genome editing. These advancements have had a significant positive impact on the field of cattle genomics. This manuscript aimed to review recent advances in genomic technologies for cattle breeding and future prospects in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kasper C. Animal board invited review: Heritability of nitrogen use efficiency in fattening pigs: Current state and possible directions. Animal 2024; 18:101225. [PMID: 39013333 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Pork, an important component of human nutrition worldwide, contributes considerably to anthropogenic nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing the environmental impact of pig production is therefore essential. This can be achieved through system-level strategies, such as optimising resource use, improving manure management and recycling leftovers from human food production, and at the individual animal level by maintaining pig health and fine-tuning dietary protein levels to individual requirements. Breeding, coupled with nutritional strategies, offers a lasting solution to improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) - the ratio of nitrogen retained in the body to nitrogen ingested. With a heritability as high as 0.54, incorporating NUE into breeding programmes appears promising. Nitrogen use efficiency involves multiple tissues and metabolic processes, and is influenced by the environment and individual animal characteristics, including its genetic background. Heritable genetic variation in NUE may therefore occur in many different processes, including the central nervous regulation of feed intake, the endocrine system, the gastrointestinal tract where digestion and absorption take place, and the composition of the gut microbiome. An animal's postabsorptive protein metabolism might also harbour important genetic variation, especially in the maintenance requirements of tissues and organs. Precise phenotyping, although challenging and costly, is essential for successful breeding. Various measurement techniques, such as imaging techniques and mechanistic models, are being explored for their potential in genetic analysis. Despite the difficulties in phenotyping, some studies have estimated the heritability and genetic correlations of NUE. These studies suggest that direct selection for NUE is more effective than indirect methods through feed efficiency. The complexity of NUE indicates a polygenic trait architecture, which has been confirmed by genome-wide association studies that have been unable to identify significant quantitative trait loci. Building sufficiently large reference populations to train genomic prediction models is an important next step. However, this will require the development of truly high-throughput phenotyping methods. In conclusion, breeding pigs with higher NUE is both feasible and necessary but will require increased efforts in high-throughput phenotyping and improved genome annotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Kasper
- Animal GenoPhenomics, Agroscope, Posieux, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yuan C, Gualdrón Duarte JL, Takeda H, Georges M, Druet T. Evaluation of heritability partitioning approaches in livestock populations. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:690. [PMID: 39003468 PMCID: PMC11246585 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10600-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heritability partitioning approaches estimate the contribution of different functional classes, such as coding or regulatory variants, to the genetic variance. This information allows a better understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits, including complex diseases, but can also help improve the accuracy of genomic selection in livestock species. However, methods have mainly been tested on human genomic data, whereas livestock populations have specific characteristics, such as high levels of relatedness, small effective population size or long-range levels of linkage disequilibrium. RESULTS Here, we used data from 14,762 cows, imputed at the whole-genome sequence level for 11,537,240 variants, to simulate traits in a typical livestock population and evaluate the accuracy of two state-of-the-art heritability partitioning methods, GREML and a Bayesian mixture model. In simulations where a single functional class had increased contribution to heritability, we observed that the estimators were unbiased but had low precision. When causal variants were enriched in variants with low (< 0.05) or high (> 0.20) minor allele frequency or low (below 1st quartile) or high (above 3rd quartile) linkage disequilibrium scores, it was necessary to partition the genetic variance into multiple classes defined on the basis of allele frequencies or LD scores to obtain unbiased results. When multiple functional classes had variable contributions to heritability, estimators showed higher levels of variation and confounding between certain categories was observed. In addition, estimators from small categories were particularly imprecise. However, the estimates and their ranking were still informative about the contribution of the classes. We also demonstrated that using methods that estimate the contribution of a single category at a time, a commonly used approach, results in an overestimation. Finally, we applied the methods to phenotypes for muscular development and height and estimated that, on average, variants in open chromatin regions had a higher contribution to the genetic variance (> 45%), while variants in coding regions had the strongest individual effects (> 25-fold enrichment on average). Conversely, variants in intergenic or intronic regions showed lower levels of enrichment (0.2 and 0.6-fold on average, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Heritability partitioning approaches should be used cautiously in livestock populations, in particular for small categories. Two-component approaches that fit only one functional category at a time lead to biased estimators and should not be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Yuan
- Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA-R & Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Avenue de L'Hôpital, 1, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
| | | | - Haruko Takeda
- Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA-R & Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Avenue de L'Hôpital, 1, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Michel Georges
- Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA-R & Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Avenue de L'Hôpital, 1, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Tom Druet
- Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA-R & Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Avenue de L'Hôpital, 1, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Farhangi S, Gòdia M, Derks MFL, Harlizius B, Dibbits B, González-Prendes R, Crooijmans RPMA, Madsen O, Groenen MAM. Expression genome-wide association study identifies key regulatory variants enriched with metabolic and immune functions in four porcine tissues. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:684. [PMID: 38992576 PMCID: PMC11238464 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10583-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integration of high throughput DNA genotyping and RNA-sequencing data enables the discovery of genomic regions that regulate gene expression, known as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). In pigs, efforts to date have been mainly focused on purebred lines for traits with commercial relevance as such growth and meat quality. However, little is known on genetic variants and mechanisms associated with the robustness of an animal, thus its overall health status. Here, the liver, lung, spleen, and muscle transcriptomes of 100 three-way crossbred female finishers were studied, with the aim of identifying novel eQTL regulatory regions and transcription factors (TFs) associated with regulation of porcine metabolism and health-related traits. RESULTS An expression genome-wide association study with 535,896 genotypes and the expression of 12,680 genes in liver, 13,310 genes in lung, 12,650 genes in spleen, and 12,595 genes in muscle resulted in 4,293, 10,630, 4,533, and 6,871 eQTL regions for each of these tissues, respectively. Although only a small fraction of the eQTLs were annotated as cis-eQTLs, these presented a higher number of polymorphisms per region and significantly stronger associations with their target gene compared to trans-eQTLs. Between 20 and 115 eQTL hotspots were identified across the four tissues. Interestingly, these were all enriched for immune-related biological processes. In spleen, two TFs were identified: ERF and ZNF45, with key roles in regulation of gene expression. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a comprehensive analysis with more than 26,000 eQTL regions identified that are now publicly available. The genomic regions and their variants were mostly associated with tissue-specific regulatory roles. However, some shared regions provide new insights into the complex regulation of genes and their interactions that are involved with important traits related to metabolism and immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samin Farhangi
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Gòdia
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Martijn F L Derks
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Topigs Norsvin Research Center, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bert Dibbits
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rayner González-Prendes
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Ausnutria BV, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ole Madsen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martien A M Groenen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lyons A, Brown J, Davenport KM. Single-Cell Sequencing Technology in Ruminant Livestock: Challenges and Opportunities. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2024; 46:5291-5306. [PMID: 38920988 PMCID: PMC11202421 DOI: 10.3390/cimb46060316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Advancements in single-cell sequencing have transformed the genomics field by allowing researchers to delve into the intricate cellular heterogeneity within tissues at greater resolution. While single-cell omics are more widely applied in model organisms and humans, their use in livestock species is just beginning. Studies in cattle, sheep, and goats have already leveraged single-cell and single-nuclei RNA-seq as well as single-cell and single-nuclei ATAC-seq to delineate cellular diversity in tissues, track changes in cell populations and gene expression over developmental stages, and characterize immune cell populations important for disease resistance and resilience. Although challenges exist for the use of this technology in ruminant livestock, such as the precise annotation of unique cell populations and spatial resolution of cells within a tissue, there is vast potential to enhance our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underpinning traits essential for healthy and productive livestock. This review intends to highlight the insights gained from published single-cell omics studies in cattle, sheep, and goats, particularly those with publicly accessible data. Further, this manuscript will discuss the challenges and opportunities of this technology in ruminant livestock and how it may contribute to enhanced profitability and sustainability of animal agriculture in the future.
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang Y, Huang Y, Zhen Y, Wang J, Wang L, Chen N, Wu F, Zhang L, Shen Y, Bi C, Li S, Pool K, Blache D, Maloney SK, Liu D, Yang Z, Li C, Yu X, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Xue C, Gu Y, Huang W, Yan L, Wei W, Wang Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Wang S, Zhao X, Luo C, Wang H, Ding L, Yang QY, Zhou P, Wang M. De novo transcriptome assembly database for 100 tissues from each of seven species of domestic herbivore. Sci Data 2024; 11:488. [PMID: 38734729 PMCID: PMC11088706 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03338-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Domesticated herbivores are an important agricultural resource that play a critical role in global food security, particularly as they can adapt to varied environments, including marginal lands. An understanding of the molecular basis of their biology would contribute to better management and sustainable production. Thus, we conducted transcriptome sequencing of 100 to 105 tissues from two females of each of seven species of herbivore (cattle, sheep, goats, sika deer, horses, donkeys, and rabbits) including two breeds of sheep. The quality of raw and trimmed reads was assessed in terms of base quality, GC content, duplication sequence rate, overrepresented k-mers, and quality score distribution with FastQC. The high-quality filtered RNA-seq raw reads were deposited in a public database which provides approximately 54 billion high-quality paired-end sequencing reads in total, with an average mapping rate of ~93.92%. Transcriptome databases represent valuable resources that can be used to study patterns of gene expression, and pathways that are related to key biological processes, including important economic traits in herbivores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi, 832000, P. R. China
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
- College of Life Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, P. R. China
| | - Yiming Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi, 832000, P. R. China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics and Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Big Data, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, P. R. China
| | - Yongkang Zhen
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Jiasheng Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Limin Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi, 832000, P. R. China
| | - Ning Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi, 832000, P. R. China
| | - Feifan Wu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Linna Zhang
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics and Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Big Data, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, P. R. China
| | - Yizhao Shen
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071033, P. R. China
| | - Congliang Bi
- College of Life Science, Linyi University, Linyi, 276005, P. R. China
| | - Song Li
- College of Life Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, P. R. China
| | - Kelsey Pool
- UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Dominique Blache
- UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Shane K Maloney
- UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Dongxu Liu
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics and Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Big Data, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, P. R. China
| | - Zhiquan Yang
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics and Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Big Data, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, P. R. China
| | - Chuang Li
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Xiang Yu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Zhenbin Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Yifei Chen
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Chun Xue
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Yalan Gu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Weidong Huang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Lu Yan
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Wenjun Wei
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Yusu Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Jinying Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Yifan Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Yiquan Sun
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China
| | - Shengbo Wang
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics and Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Big Data, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, P. R. China
| | - Xinle Zhao
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics and Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Big Data, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, P. R. China
| | - Chengfang Luo
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics and Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Big Data, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, P. R. China
| | - Haodong Wang
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics and Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Big Data, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, P. R. China
| | - Luoyang Ding
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China.
- UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
| | - Qing-Yong Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi, 832000, P. R. China.
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics and Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Big Data, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, P. R. China.
| | - Ping Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi, 832000, P. R. China.
| | - Mengzhi Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schneider H, Krizanac AM, Falker-Gieske C, Heise J, Tetens J, Thaller G, Bennewitz J. Genomic dissection of the correlation between milk yield and various health traits using functional and evolutionary information about imputed sequence variants of 34,497 German Holstein cows. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:265. [PMID: 38461236 PMCID: PMC11385139 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10115-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last decades, it was subject of many studies to investigate the genomic connection of milk production and health traits in dairy cattle. Thereby, incorporating functional information in genomic analyses has been shown to improve the understanding of biological and molecular mechanisms shaping complex traits and the accuracies of genomic prediction, especially in small populations and across-breed settings. Still, little is known about the contribution of different functional and evolutionary genome partitioning subsets to milk production and dairy health. Thus, we performed a uni- and a bivariate analysis of milk yield (MY) and eight health traits using a set of ~34,497 German Holstein cows with 50K chip genotypes and ~17 million imputed sequence variants divided into 27 subsets depending on their functional and evolutionary annotation. In the bivariate analysis, eight trait-combinations were observed that contrasted MY with each health trait. Two genomic relationship matrices (GRM) were included, one consisting of the 50K chip variants and one consisting of each set of subset variants, to obtain subset heritabilities and genetic correlations. In addition, 50K chip heritabilities and genetic correlations were estimated applying merely the 50K GRM. RESULTS In general, 50K chip heritabilities were larger than the subset heritabilities. The largest heritabilities were found for MY, which was 0.4358 for the 50K and 0.2757 for the subset heritabilities. Whereas all 50K genetic correlations were negative, subset genetic correlations were both, positive and negative (ranging from -0.9324 between MY and mastitis to 0.6662 between MY and digital dermatitis). The subsets containing variants which were annotated as noncoding related, splice sites, untranslated regions, metabolic quantitative trait loci, and young variants ranked highest in terms of their contribution to the traits` genetic variance. We were able to show that linkage disequilibrium between subset variants and adjacent variants did not cause these subsets` high effect. CONCLUSION Our results confirm the connection of milk production and health traits in dairy cattle via the animals` metabolic state. In addition, they highlight the potential of including functional information in genomic analyses, which helps to dissect the extent and direction of the observed traits` connection in more detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Schneider
- Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
| | - Ana-Marija Krizanac
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Johannes Heise
- Vereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung w.V. (VIT), 27283, Verden, Germany
| | - Jens Tetens
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Georg Thaller
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, 24098, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jörn Bennewitz
- Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dufour A, Kurylo C, Stöckl JB, Laloë D, Bailly Y, Manceau P, Martins F, Turhan AG, Ferchaud S, Pain B, Fröhlich T, Foissac S, Artus J, Acloque H. Cell specification and functional interactions in the pig blastocyst inferred from single-cell transcriptomics and uterine fluids proteomics. Genomics 2024; 116:110780. [PMID: 38211822 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2023.110780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
The embryonic development of the pig comprises a long in utero pre- and peri-implantation development, which dramatically differs from mice and humans. During this peri-implantation period, a complex series of paracrine signals establishes an intimate dialogue between the embryo and the uterus. To better understand the biology of the pig blastocyst during this period, we generated a large dataset of single-cell RNAseq from early and hatched blastocysts, spheroid and ovoid conceptus and proteomic datasets from corresponding uterine fluids. Our results confirm the molecular specificity and functionality of the three main cell populations. We also discovered two previously unknown subpopulations of the trophectoderm, one characterised by the expression of LRP2, which could represent progenitor cells, and the other, expressing pro-apoptotic markers, which could correspond to the Rauber's layer. Our work provides new insights into the biology of these populations, their reciprocal functional interactions, and the molecular dialogue with the maternal uterine environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Dufour
- Université Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France
| | - Cyril Kurylo
- Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, GenPhySE, Chemin de Borde Rouge, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Jan B Stöckl
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Genzentrum, Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Denis Laloë
- Université Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France
| | - Yoann Bailly
- INRAE, GenESI, La Gouvanière, 86480 Rouillé, France
| | | | - Frédéric Martins
- Plateforme Genome et Transcriptome (GeT-Santé), GenoToul, Toulouse University, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France; I2MC - Institut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, Inserm, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Ali G Turhan
- Université Paris Saclay, Inserm, UMRS1310, 7 rue Guy Moquet, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | | | - Bertrand Pain
- Université de Lyon, Inserm, INRAE, SBRI, 18 Av. du Doyen Jean Lépine, 69500 Bron, France
| | - Thomas Fröhlich
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Genzentrum, Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Sylvain Foissac
- Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, GenPhySE, Chemin de Borde Rouge, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Jérôme Artus
- Université Paris Saclay, Inserm, UMRS1310, 7 rue Guy Moquet, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Hervé Acloque
- Université Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Teng J, Gao Y, Yin H, Bai Z, Liu S, Zeng H, Bai L, Cai Z, Zhao B, Li X, Xu Z, Lin Q, Pan Z, Yang W, Yu X, Guan D, Hou Y, Keel BN, Rohrer GA, Lindholm-Perry AK, Oliver WT, Ballester M, Crespo-Piazuelo D, Quintanilla R, Canela-Xandri O, Rawlik K, Xia C, Yao Y, Zhao Q, Yao W, Yang L, Li H, Zhang H, Liao W, Chen T, Karlskov-Mortensen P, Fredholm M, Amills M, Clop A, Giuffra E, Wu J, Cai X, Diao S, Pan X, Wei C, Li J, Cheng H, Wang S, Su G, Sahana G, Lund MS, Dekkers JCM, Kramer L, Tuggle CK, Corbett R, Groenen MAM, Madsen O, Gòdia M, Rocha D, Charles M, Li CJ, Pausch H, Hu X, Frantz L, Luo Y, Lin L, Zhou Z, Zhang Z, Chen Z, Cui L, Xiang R, Shen X, Li P, Huang R, Tang G, Li M, Zhao Y, Yi G, Tang Z, Jiang J, Zhao F, Yuan X, Liu X, Chen Y, Xu X, Zhao S, Zhao P, Haley C, Zhou H, Wang Q, Pan Y, Ding X, Ma L, Li J, Navarro P, Zhang Q, Li B, Tenesa A, Li K, Liu GE, et alTeng J, Gao Y, Yin H, Bai Z, Liu S, Zeng H, Bai L, Cai Z, Zhao B, Li X, Xu Z, Lin Q, Pan Z, Yang W, Yu X, Guan D, Hou Y, Keel BN, Rohrer GA, Lindholm-Perry AK, Oliver WT, Ballester M, Crespo-Piazuelo D, Quintanilla R, Canela-Xandri O, Rawlik K, Xia C, Yao Y, Zhao Q, Yao W, Yang L, Li H, Zhang H, Liao W, Chen T, Karlskov-Mortensen P, Fredholm M, Amills M, Clop A, Giuffra E, Wu J, Cai X, Diao S, Pan X, Wei C, Li J, Cheng H, Wang S, Su G, Sahana G, Lund MS, Dekkers JCM, Kramer L, Tuggle CK, Corbett R, Groenen MAM, Madsen O, Gòdia M, Rocha D, Charles M, Li CJ, Pausch H, Hu X, Frantz L, Luo Y, Lin L, Zhou Z, Zhang Z, Chen Z, Cui L, Xiang R, Shen X, Li P, Huang R, Tang G, Li M, Zhao Y, Yi G, Tang Z, Jiang J, Zhao F, Yuan X, Liu X, Chen Y, Xu X, Zhao S, Zhao P, Haley C, Zhou H, Wang Q, Pan Y, Ding X, Ma L, Li J, Navarro P, Zhang Q, Li B, Tenesa A, Li K, Liu GE, Zhang Z, Fang L. A compendium of genetic regulatory effects across pig tissues. Nat Genet 2024; 56:112-123. [PMID: 38177344 PMCID: PMC10786720 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01585-7] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
The Farm Animal Genotype-Tissue Expression (FarmGTEx) project has been established to develop a public resource of genetic regulatory variants in livestock, which is essential for linking genetic polymorphisms to variation in phenotypes, helping fundamental biological discovery and exploitation in animal breeding and human biomedicine. Here we show results from the pilot phase of PigGTEx by processing 5,457 RNA-sequencing and 1,602 whole-genome sequencing samples passing quality control from pigs. We build a pig genotype imputation panel and associate millions of genetic variants with five types of transcriptomic phenotypes in 34 tissues. We evaluate tissue specificity of regulatory effects and elucidate molecular mechanisms of their action using multi-omics data. Leveraging this resource, we decipher regulatory mechanisms underlying 207 pig complex phenotypes and demonstrate the similarity of pigs to humans in gene expression and the genetic regulation behind complex phenotypes, supporting the importance of pigs as a human biomedical model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinyan Teng
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Yahui Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (ARS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, MD, USA
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Hongwei Yin
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhonghao Bai
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shuli Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (ARS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, MD, USA
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haonan Zeng
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Lijing Bai
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zexi Cai
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bingru Zhao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiujin Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Waterfowl Healthy Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiting Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhangyuan Pan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjing Yang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Xiaoshan Yu
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Yali Hou
- Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China
| | - Brittney N Keel
- ARS, USDA, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA
| | - Gary A Rohrer
- ARS, USDA, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA
| | | | - William T Oliver
- ARS, USDA, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA
| | - Maria Ballester
- Animal Breeding and Genetics Programme, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon, Caldes de Montbui, Spain
| | - Daniel Crespo-Piazuelo
- Animal Breeding and Genetics Programme, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon, Caldes de Montbui, Spain
| | - Raquel Quintanilla
- Animal Breeding and Genetics Programme, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon, Caldes de Montbui, Spain
| | - Oriol Canela-Xandri
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Konrad Rawlik
- Baillie Gifford Pandemic Science Hub, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charley Xia
- Lothian Birth Cohort studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Yuelin Yao
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Qianyi Zhao
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wenye Yao
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Liu Yang
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Houcheng Li
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Huicong Zhang
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Wang Liao
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tianshuo Chen
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Karlskov-Mortensen
- Animal Genetics, Bioinformatics and Breeding, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Fredholm
- Animal Genetics, Bioinformatics and Breeding, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marcel Amills
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Alex Clop
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisabetta Giuffra
- Paris-Saclay University, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Jun Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaodian Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuqi Diao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangchun Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinghui Li
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Hao Cheng
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Sheng Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Guosheng Su
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Goutam Sahana
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mogens Sandø Lund
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jack C M Dekkers
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Luke Kramer
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | | | - Ryan Corbett
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Martien A M Groenen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ole Madsen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Gòdia
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Dominique Rocha
- Paris-Saclay University, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Mathieu Charles
- Paris-Saclay University, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, SIGENAE, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Cong-Jun Li
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (ARS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Hubert Pausch
- Animal Genomics, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 2, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Xiaoxiang Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Laurent Frantz
- Palaeogenomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Yonglun Luo
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Lars Bolund Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Qingdao-Europe Advanced Institute for Life Sciences, BGI-Research, Qingdao, China
| | - Lin Lin
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Zhongyin Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zitao Chen
- Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Leilei Cui
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Human Aging Research Institute and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, and Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Human Aging, Jiangxi, China
- UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ruidong Xiang
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Xia Shen
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Center for Intelligent Medicine Research, Greater Bay Area Institute of Precision Medicine, Fudan University, Guangzhou, China
- Centre for Global Health Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Pinghua Li
- Institute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ruihua Huang
- Institute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Guoqing Tang
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingzhou Li
- Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yunxiang Zhao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
| | - Guoqiang Yi
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhonglin Tang
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jicai Jiang
- Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Fuping Zhao
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolong Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaosheng Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuewen Xu
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education and College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Shuhong Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education and College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Pengju Zhao
- Hainan Institute, Zhejiang University, Yongyou Industry Park, Yazhou Bay Sci-Tech City, Sanya, China
| | - Chris Haley
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Qishan Wang
- Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuchun Pan
- Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiangdong Ding
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Jiaqi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Pau Navarro
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Qin Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Bingjie Li
- Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Roslin Institute Building, Midlothian, UK
| | - Albert Tenesa
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
| | - Kui Li
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
| | - George E Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (ARS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, MD, USA.
| | - Zhe Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China.
| | - Lingzhao Fang
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Woolley SA, Salavati M, Clark EL. Recent advances in the genomic resources for sheep. Mamm Genome 2023; 34:545-558. [PMID: 37752302 PMCID: PMC10627984 DOI: 10.1007/s00335-023-10018-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
Sheep (Ovis aries) provide a vital source of protein and fibre to human populations. In coming decades, as the pressures associated with rapidly changing climates increase, breeding sheep sustainably as well as producing enough protein to feed a growing human population will pose a considerable challenge for sheep production across the globe. High quality reference genomes and other genomic resources can help to meet these challenges by: (1) informing breeding programmes by adding a priori information about the genome, (2) providing tools such as pangenomes for characterising and conserving global genetic diversity, and (3) improving our understanding of fundamental biology using the power of genomic information to link cell, tissue and whole animal scale knowledge. In this review we describe recent advances in the genomic resources available for sheep, discuss how these might help to meet future challenges for sheep production, and provide some insight into what the future might hold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shernae A Woolley
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Mazdak Salavati
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
- Scotland's Rural College, Parkgate, Barony Campus, Dumfries, DG1 3NE, UK
| | - Emily L Clark
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Xiang R, Fang L, Liu S, Macleod IM, Liu Z, Breen EJ, Gao Y, Liu GE, Tenesa A, Mason BA, Chamberlain AJ, Wray NR, Goddard ME. Gene expression and RNA splicing explain large proportions of the heritability for complex traits in cattle. CELL GENOMICS 2023; 3:100385. [PMID: 37868035 PMCID: PMC10589627 DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Many quantitative trait loci (QTLs) are in non-coding regions. Therefore, QTLs are assumed to affect gene regulation. Gene expression and RNA splicing are primary steps of transcription, so DNA variants changing gene expression (eVariants) or RNA splicing (sVariants) are expected to significantly affect phenotypes. We quantify the contribution of eVariants and sVariants detected from 16 tissues (n = 4,725) to 37 traits of ∼120,000 cattle (average magnitude of genetic correlation between traits = 0.13). Analyzed in Bayesian mixture models, averaged across 37 traits, cis and trans eVariants and sVariants detected from 16 tissues jointly explain 69.2% (SE = 0.5%) of heritability, 44% more than expected from the same number of random variants. This 69.2% includes an average of 24% from trans e-/sVariants (14% more than expected). Averaged across 56 lipidomic traits, multi-tissue cis and trans e-/sVariants also explain 71.5% (SE = 0.3%) of heritability, demonstrating the essential role of proximal and distal regulatory variants in shaping mammalian phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruidong Xiang
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
- Cambridge-Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Lingzhao Fang
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Shuli Liu
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China
| | - Iona M. Macleod
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Zhiqian Liu
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Edmond J. Breen
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Yahui Gao
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - George E. Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Albert Tenesa
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, the University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
| | - CattleGTEx Consortium
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
- Cambridge-Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, the University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
- Institute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
- Queensland Brain Institute, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Brett A. Mason
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Amanda J. Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Naomi R. Wray
- Institute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
- Queensland Brain Institute, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Michael E. Goddard
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Neeteson AM, Avendaño S, Koerhuis A, Duggan B, Souza E, Mason J, Ralph J, Rohlf P, Burnside T, Kranis A, Bailey R. Evolutions in Commercial Meat Poultry Breeding. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:3150. [PMID: 37835756 PMCID: PMC10571742 DOI: 10.3390/ani13193150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the history of commercial poultry breeding, from domestication to the development of science and commercial breeding structures. The development of breeding goals over time, from mainly focusing on production to broad goals, including bird welfare and health, robustness, environmental impact, biological efficiency and reproduction, is detailed. The paper outlines current breeding goals, including traits (e.g., on foot and leg health, contact dermatitis, gait, cardiovascular health, robustness and livability), recording techniques, their genetic basis and how trait these antagonisms, for example, between welfare and production, are managed. Novel areas like genomic selection and gut health research and their current and potential impact on breeding are highlighted. The environmental impact differences of various genotypes are explained. A future outlook shows that balanced, holistic breeding will continue to enable affordable lean animal protein to feed the world, with a focus on the welfare of the birds and a diversity of choice for the various preferences and cultures across the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Santiago Avendaño
- Aviagen Group, Newbridge EH28 8SZ, UK; (S.A.); (A.K.); (T.B.); (R.B.)
| | - Alfons Koerhuis
- Aviagen Group, Newbridge EH28 8SZ, UK; (S.A.); (A.K.); (T.B.); (R.B.)
| | | | - Eduardo Souza
- Aviagen Inc., Huntsville, AL 35805, USA; (E.S.); (J.M.)
| | - James Mason
- Aviagen Inc., Huntsville, AL 35805, USA; (E.S.); (J.M.)
| | - John Ralph
- Aviagen Turkeys Ltd., Tattenhall CH3 9GA, UK;
| | - Paige Rohlf
- Aviagen Turkeys Inc., Lewisburg, WV 24901, USA;
| | - Tim Burnside
- Aviagen Group, Newbridge EH28 8SZ, UK; (S.A.); (A.K.); (T.B.); (R.B.)
| | - Andreas Kranis
- Aviagen Ltd., Newbridge EH28 8SZ, UK; (B.D.); or (A.K.)
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Richard Bailey
- Aviagen Group, Newbridge EH28 8SZ, UK; (S.A.); (A.K.); (T.B.); (R.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Banos G. Selective breeding can contribute to bovine tuberculosis control and eradication. Ir Vet J 2023; 76:19. [PMID: 37620894 PMCID: PMC10464393 DOI: 10.1186/s13620-023-00250-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) persists in many countries having a significant impact on public health and livestock industry finances. The incidence and prevalence of new cases in parts of the UK and elsewhere over the past decades warrant intensified efforts towards achieving Officially Tuberculosis Free (OTF) status in the respective regions. Genetic selection aiming to identify and remove inherently susceptible animals from breeding has been proposed as an additional measure in ongoing programmes towards controlling the disease. The presence of genetic variation among individual animals in their capacity to respond to Mycobacterium bovis exposure has been documented and heritability estimates of 0.06-0.18 have been reported. Despite their moderate magnitude, these estimates suggest that host resistance to bTB is amenable to improvement with selective breeding. Although relatively slow, genetic progress can be constant, cumulative and permanent, thereby complementing ongoing disease control measures. Importantly, mostly no antagonistic genetic correlations have been found between bTB resistance and other animal traits suggesting that carefully incorporating the former in breeding decisions should not adversely affect bovine productivity. Simulation studies have demonstrated the potential impact of genetic selection on reducing the probability of a breakdown to occur or the duration and severity of a breakdown that has already been declared. Furthermore, research on the bovine genome has identified multiple genomic markers and genes associated with bTB resistance. Nevertheless, the combined outcomes of these studies suggest that host resistance to bTB is a complex, polygenic trait, with no single gene alone explaining the inherent differences between resistant and susceptible animals. Such results support the development of accurate genomic breeding values that duly capture the collective effect of multiple genes to underpin selective breeding programmes. In addition to improving host resistance to bTB, scientists and practitioners have considered the possibility of reducing host infectivity. Ongoing studies have suggested the presence of genetic variation for infectivity and confirmed that bTB eradication would be accelerated if selective breeding considered both host resistance and infectivity traits. In conclusion, research activity on bTB genetics has generated knowledge and insights to support selective breeding as an additional measure towards controlling and eradicating the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Banos
- Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Salavati M, Clark R, Becker D, Kühn C, Plastow G, Dupont S, Moreira GCM, Charlier C, Clark EL. Improving the annotation of the cattle genome by annotating transcription start sites in a diverse set of tissues and populations using Cap Analysis Gene Expression sequencing. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2023; 13:jkad108. [PMID: 37216666 PMCID: PMC10411599 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the genomic control of tissue-specific gene expression and regulation can help to inform the application of genomic technologies in farm animal breeding programs. The fine mapping of promoters [transcription start sites (TSS)] and enhancers (divergent amplifying segments of the genome local to TSS) in different populations of cattle across a wide diversity of tissues provides information to locate and understand the genomic drivers of breed- and tissue-specific characteristics. To this aim, we used Cap Analysis Gene Expression (CAGE) sequencing, of 24 different tissues from 3 populations of cattle, to define TSS and their coexpressed short-range enhancers (<1 kb) in the ARS-UCD1.2_Btau5.0.1Y reference genome (1000bulls run9) and analyzed tissue and population specificity of expressed promoters. We identified 51,295 TSS and 2,328 TSS-Enhancer regions shared across the 3 populations (dairy, beef-dairy cross, and Canadian Kinsella composite cattle from 2 individuals, 1 of each sex, per population). Cross-species comparative analysis of CAGE data from 7 other species, including sheep, revealed a set of TSS and TSS-Enhancers that were specific to cattle. The CAGE data set will be combined with other transcriptomic information for the same tissues to create a new high-resolution map of transcript diversity across tissues and populations in cattle for the BovReg project. Here we provide the CAGE data set and annotation tracks for TSS and TSS-Enhancers in the cattle genome. This new annotation information will improve our understanding of the drivers of gene expression and regulation in cattle and help to inform the application of genomic technologies in breeding programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mazdak Salavati
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Richard Clark
- Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility, Genetics Core, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Doreen Becker
- Institute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf 18196, Germany
| | - Christa Kühn
- Institute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf 18196, Germany
- Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University Rostock, Rostock 18059, Germany
| | - Graham Plastow
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Livestock Gentec, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2H1, Canada
| | - Sébastien Dupont
- Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA Institute, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium
| | | | - Carole Charlier
- Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA Institute, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Smith TPL, Bickhart DM, Boichard D, Chamberlain AJ, Djikeng A, Jiang Y, Low WY, Pausch H, Demyda-Peyrás S, Prendergast J, Schnabel RD, Rosen BD. The Bovine Pangenome Consortium: democratizing production and accessibility of genome assemblies for global cattle breeds and other bovine species. Genome Biol 2023; 24:139. [PMID: 37337218 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-02975-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The Bovine Pangenome Consortium (BPC) is an international collaboration dedicated to the assembly of cattle genomes to develop a more complete representation of cattle genomic diversity. The goal of the BPC is to provide genome assemblies and a community-agreed pangenome representation to replace breed-specific reference assemblies for cattle genomics. The BPC invites partners sharing our vision to participate in the production of these assemblies and the development of a common, community-approved, pangenome reference as a public resource for the research community ( https://bovinepangenome.github.io/ ). This community-driven resource will provide the context for comparison between studies and the future foundation for cattle genomic selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P L Smith
- US Meat Animal Research Center, USDA-ARS, Clay Center, NE, 68933, USA
| | | | - Didier Boichard
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Amanda J Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
| | - Appolinaire Djikeng
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, ILRI Kenya, Nairobi, 30709-00100, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Yu Jiang
- Center for Ruminant Genetics and Evolution, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
| | - Wai Y Low
- The Davies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia
| | - Hubert Pausch
- Animal Genomics, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 2, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Demyda-Peyrás
- Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 1900, La Plata, Argentina
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Y Tecnológicas (CONICET), CCT-La Plata, 1900, La Plata, Argentina
| | - James Prendergast
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Robert D Schnabel
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
| | - Benjamin D Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Desire S, Johnsson M, Ros-Freixedes R, Chen CY, Holl JW, Herring WO, Gorjanc G, Mellanby RJ, Hickey JM, Jungnickel MK. A genome-wide association study for loin depth and muscle pH in pigs from intensely selected purebred lines. Genet Sel Evol 2023; 55:42. [PMID: 37322449 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00815-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) aim at identifying genomic regions involved in phenotype expression, but identifying causative variants is difficult. Pig Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (pCADD) scores provide a measure of the predicted consequences of genetic variants. Incorporating pCADD into the GWAS pipeline may help their identification. Our objective was to identify genomic regions associated with loin depth and muscle pH, and identify regions of interest for fine-mapping and further experimental work. Genotypes for ~ 40,000 single nucleotide morphisms (SNPs) were used to perform GWAS for these two traits, using de-regressed breeding values (dEBV) for 329,964 pigs from four commercial lines. Imputed sequence data was used to identify SNPs in strong ([Formula: see text] 0.80) linkage disequilibrium with lead GWAS SNPs with the highest pCADD scores. RESULTS Fifteen distinct regions were associated with loin depth and one with loin pH at genome-wide significance. Regions on chromosomes 1, 2, 5, 7, and 16, explained between 0.06 and 3.55% of the additive genetic variance and were strongly associated with loin depth. Only a small part of the additive genetic variance in muscle pH was attributed to SNPs. The results of our pCADD analysis suggests that high-scoring pCADD variants are enriched for missense mutations. Two close but distinct regions on SSC1 were associated with loin depth, and pCADD identified the previously identified missense variant within the MC4R gene for one of the lines. For loin pH, pCADD identified a synonymous variant in the RNF25 gene (SSC15) as the most likely candidate for the muscle pH association. The missense mutation in the PRKAG3 gene known to affect glycogen content was not prioritised by pCADD for loin pH. CONCLUSIONS For loin depth, we identified several strong candidate regions for further statistical fine-mapping that are supported in the literature, and two novel regions. For loin muscle pH, we identified one previously identified associated region. We found mixed evidence for the utility of pCADD as an extension of heuristic fine-mapping. The next step is to perform more sophisticated fine-mapping and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis, and then interrogate candidate variants in vitro by perturbation-CRISPR assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Desire
- The Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
| | - Martin Johnsson
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Roger Ros-Freixedes
- Departament de Ciència Animal, Universitat de Lleida-Agrotecnio-CERCA Center, Lleida, Spain
| | - Ching-Yi Chen
- The Pig Improvement Company, Genus Plc, Hendersonville, TN, USA
| | - Justin W Holl
- The Pig Improvement Company, Genus Plc, Hendersonville, TN, USA
| | | | - Gregor Gorjanc
- The Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Richard J Mellanby
- The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - John M Hickey
- The Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Powell J, Talenti A, Fisch A, Hemmink JD, Paxton E, Toye P, Santos I, Ferreira BR, Connelley TK, Morrison LJ, Prendergast JGD. Profiling the immune epigenome across global cattle breeds. Genome Biol 2023; 24:127. [PMID: 37218021 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-02964-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the variation between well and poorly adapted cattle breeds to local environments and pathogens is essential for breeding cattle with improved climate and disease-resistant phenotypes. Although considerable progress has been made towards identifying genetic differences between breeds, variation at the epigenetic and chromatin levels remains poorly characterized. Here, we generate, sequence and analyse over 150 libraries at base-pair resolution to explore the dynamics of DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility of the bovine immune system across three distinct cattle lineages. RESULTS We find extensive epigenetic divergence between the taurine and indicine cattle breeds across immune cell types, which is linked to the levels of local DNA sequence divergence between the two cattle sub-species. The unique cell type profiles enable the deconvolution of complex cellular mixtures using digital cytometry approaches. Finally, we show distinct sub-categories of CpG islands based on their chromatin and methylation profiles that discriminate between classes of distal and gene proximal islands linked to discrete transcriptional states. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides a comprehensive resource of DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility and RNA expression profiles of three diverse cattle populations. The findings have important implications, from understanding how genetic editing across breeds, and consequently regulatory backgrounds, may have distinct impacts to designing effective cattle epigenome-wide association studies in non-European breeds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Powell
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
| | - Andrea Talenti
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Andressa Fisch
- Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Johanneke D Hemmink
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
- The International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Edith Paxton
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Philip Toye
- The International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, ILRI Kenya, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Isabel Santos
- Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Beatriz R Ferreira
- Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Tim K Connelley
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Liam J Morrison
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
| | - James G D Prendergast
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Johnsson M. Genomics in animal breeding from the perspectives of matrices and molecules. Hereditas 2023; 160:20. [PMID: 37149663 PMCID: PMC10163706 DOI: 10.1186/s41065-023-00285-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper describes genomics from two perspectives that are in use in animal breeding and genetics: a statistical perspective concentrating on models for estimating breeding values, and a sequence perspective concentrating on the function of DNA molecules. MAIN BODY This paper reviews the development of genomics in animal breeding and speculates on its future from these two perspectives. From the statistical perspective, genomic data are large sets of markers of ancestry; animal breeding makes use of them while remaining agnostic about their function. From the sequence perspective, genomic data are a source of causative variants; what animal breeding needs is to identify and make use of them. CONCLUSION The statistical perspective, in the form of genomic selection, is the more applicable in contemporary breeding. Animal genomics researchers using from the sequence perspective are still working towards this the isolation of causative variants, equipped with new technologies but continuing a decades-long line of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Johnsson
- Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7023, Uppsala, 75007, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pausch H, Mapel XM. Review: Genetic mutations affecting bull fertility. Animal 2023; 17 Suppl 1:100742. [PMID: 37567657 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Cattle are a well-suited "model organism" to study the genetic underpinnings of variation in male reproductive performance. The adoption of artificial insemination and genomic prediction in many cattle breeds provide access to microarray-derived genotypes and repeated measurements for semen quality and insemination success in several thousand bulls. Similar-sized mapping cohorts with phenotypes for male fertility are not available for most other species precluding powerful association testing. The repeated measurements of the artificial insemination bulls' semen quality enable the differentiation between transient and biologically relevant trait fluctuations, and thus, are an ideal source of phenotypes for variance components estimation and genome-wide association testing. Genome-wide case-control association testing involving bulls with either aberrant sperm quality or low insemination success revealed several causal recessive loss-of-function alleles underpinning monogenic reproductive disorders. These variants are routinely monitored with customised genotyping arrays in the male selection candidates to avoid the use of subfertile or infertile bulls for artificial insemination and natural service. Genome-wide association studies with quantitative measurements of semen quality and insemination success revealed quantitative trait loci for male fertility, but the underlying causal variants remain largely unknown. Moreover, these loci explain only a small part of the heritability of male fertility. Integrating genome-wide association studies with gene expression and other omics data from male reproductive tissues is required for the fine-mapping of candidate causal variants underlying variation in male reproductive performance in cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hubert Pausch
- Animal Genomics, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Xena Marie Mapel
- Animal Genomics, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Li J, Guan D, Halstead MM, Islas-Trejo AD, Goszczynski DE, Ernst CW, Cheng H, Ross P, Zhou H. Transcriptome annotation of 17 porcine tissues using nanopore sequencing technology. Anim Genet 2023; 54:35-44. [PMID: 36385508 DOI: 10.1111/age.13274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The annotation of animal genomes plays an important role in elucidating molecular mechanisms behind the genetic control of economically important traits. Here, we employed long-read sequencing technology, Oxford Nanopore Technology, to annotate the pig transcriptome across 17 tissues from two Yorkshire littermate pigs. More than 9.8 million reads were obtained from a single flow cell, and 69 781 unique transcripts at 50 108 loci were identified. Of these transcripts, 16 255 were found to be novel isoforms, and 22 344 were found at loci that were novel and unannotated in the Ensembl (release 102) and NCBI (release 106) annotations. Novel transcripts were mostly expressed in cerebellum, followed by lung, liver, spleen, and hypothalamus. By comparing the unannotated transcripts to existing databases, there were 21 285 (95.3%) transcripts matched to the NT database (v5) and 13 676 (61.2%) matched to the NR database (v5). Moreover, there were 4324 (19.4%) transcripts matched to the SwissProt database (v5), corresponding to 11 356 proteins. Tissue-specific gene expression analyses showed that 9749 transcripts were highly tissue-specific, and cerebellum contained the most tissue-specific transcripts. As the same samples were used for the annotation of cis-regulatory elements in the pig genome, the transcriptome annotation generated by this study provides an additional and complementary annotation resource for the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes effort to comprehensively annotate the pig genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghui Li
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Michelle M Halstead
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Alma D Islas-Trejo
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Daniel E Goszczynski
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Catherine W Ernst
- Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Hao Cheng
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Pablo Ross
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Martin FJ, Amode MR, Aneja A, Austine-Orimoloye O, Azov A, Barnes I, Becker A, Bennett R, Berry A, Bhai J, Bhurji S, Bignell A, Boddu S, Branco Lins PR, Brooks L, Ramaraju SB, Charkhchi M, Cockburn A, Da Rin Fiorretto L, Davidson C, Dodiya K, Donaldson S, El Houdaigui B, El Naboulsi T, Fatima R, Giron CG, Genez T, Ghattaoraya GS, Martinez JG, Guijarro C, Hardy M, Hollis Z, Hourlier T, Hunt T, Kay M, Kaykala V, Le T, Lemos D, Marques-Coelho D, Marugán JC, Merino G, Mirabueno L, Mushtaq A, Hossain S, Ogeh DN, Sakthivel MP, Parker A, Perry M, Piližota I, Prosovetskaia I, Pérez-Silva JG, Salam A, Saraiva-Agostinho N, Schuilenburg H, Sheppard D, Sinha S, Sipos B, Stark W, Steed E, Sukumaran R, Sumathipala D, Suner MM, Surapaneni L, Sutinen K, Szpak M, Tricomi F, Urbina-Gómez D, Veidenberg A, Walsh T, Walts B, Wass E, Willhoft N, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, Chakiachvili M, Flint B, Giorgetti S, Haggerty L, Ilsley G, Loveland J, Moore B, Mudge J, Tate J, Thybert D, Trevanion S, Winterbottom A, Frankish A, Hunt SE, Ruffier M, Cunningham F, Dyer S, Finn R, Howe K, Harrison PW, Yates AD, Flicek P. Ensembl 2023. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:D933-D941. [PMID: 36318249 PMCID: PMC9825606 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 543] [Impact Index Per Article: 271.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Ensembl (https://www.ensembl.org) has produced high-quality genomic resources for vertebrates and model organisms for more than twenty years. During that time, our resources, services and tools have continually evolved in line with both the publicly available genome data and the downstream research and applications that utilise the Ensembl platform. In recent years we have witnessed a dramatic shift in the genomic landscape. There has been a large increase in the number of high-quality reference genomes through global biodiversity initiatives. In parallel, there have been major advances towards pangenome representations of higher species, where many alternative genome assemblies representing different breeds, cultivars, strains and haplotypes are now available. In order to support these efforts and accelerate downstream research, it is our goal at Ensembl to create high-quality annotations, tools and services for species across the tree of life. Here, we report our resources for popular reference genomes, the dramatic growth of our annotations (including haplotypes from the first human pangenome graphs), updates to the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP), interactive protein structure predictions from AlphaFold DB, and the beta release of our new website.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fergal J Martin
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Ridwan Amode
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alisha Aneja
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Olanrewaju Austine-Orimoloye
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrey G Azov
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - If Barnes
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Arne Becker
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ruth Bennett
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew Berry
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jyothish Bhai
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simarpreet Kaur Bhurji
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexandra Bignell
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sanjay Boddu
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paulo R Branco Lins
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lucy Brooks
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shashank Budhanuru Ramaraju
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mehrnaz Charkhchi
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexander Cockburn
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luca Da Rin Fiorretto
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Claire Davidson
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kamalkumar Dodiya
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Donaldson
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bilal El Houdaigui
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tamara El Naboulsi
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Reham Fatima
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carlos Garcia Giron
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thiago Genez
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gurpreet S Ghattaoraya
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jose Gonzalez Martinez
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cristi Guijarro
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew Hardy
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Zoe Hollis
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thibaut Hourlier
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Toby Hunt
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mike Kay
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vinay Kaykala
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tuan Le
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Diana Lemos
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Diego Marques-Coelho
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - José Carlos Marugán
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gabriela Alejandra Merino
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louisse Paola Mirabueno
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Aleena Mushtaq
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Syed Nakib Hossain
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Denye N Ogeh
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Manoj Pandian Sakthivel
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Parker
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Malcolm Perry
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ivana Piližota
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irina Prosovetskaia
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - José G Pérez-Silva
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ahamed Imran Abdul Salam
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nuno Saraiva-Agostinho
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Schuilenburg
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Dan Sheppard
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Swati Sinha
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Botond Sipos
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - William Stark
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emily Steed
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ranjit Sukumaran
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Dulika Sumathipala
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marie-Marthe Suner
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Likhitha Surapaneni
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kyösti Sutinen
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michal Szpak
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Francesca Floriana Tricomi
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Urbina-Gómez
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andres Veidenberg
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas A Walsh
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Brandon Walts
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elizabeth Wass
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Natalie Willhoft
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jamie Allen
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jorge Alvarez-Jarreta
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marc Chakiachvili
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bethany Flint
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stefano Giorgetti
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Leanne Haggerty
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Garth R Ilsley
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jane E Loveland
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Benjamin Moore
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan M Mudge
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - John Tate
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Thybert
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen J Trevanion
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrea Winterbottom
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adam Frankish
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah E Hunt
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Magali Ruffier
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona Cunningham
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Dyer
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Robert D Finn
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kevin L Howe
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter W Harrison
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew D Yates
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Flicek
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Afonso J, Shim WJ, Boden M, Salinas Fortes MR, da Silva Diniz WJ, de Lima AO, Rocha MIP, Cardoso TF, Bruscadin JJ, Gromboni CF, Nogueira ARA, Mourão GB, Zerlotini A, Coutinho LL, de Almeida Regitano LC. Repressive epigenetic mechanisms, such as the H3K27me3 histone modification, were predicted to affect muscle gene expression and its mineral content in Nelore cattle. Biochem Biophys Rep 2023; 33:101420. [PMID: 36654922 PMCID: PMC9841166 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2023.101420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic repression has been linked to the regulation of different cell states. In this study, we focus on the influence of this repression, mainly by H3K27me3, over gene expression in muscle cells, which may affect mineral content, a phenotype that is relevant to muscle function and beef quality. Based on the inverse relationship between H3K27me3 and gene expression (i.e., epigenetic repression) and on contrasting sample groups, we computationally predicted regulatory genes that affect muscle mineral content. To this end, we applied the TRIAGE predictive method followed by a rank product analysis. This methodology can predict regulatory genes that might be affected by repressive epigenetic regulation related to mineral concentration. Annotation of orthologous genes, between human and bovine, enabled our investigation of gene expression in the Longissimus thoracis muscle of Bos indicus cattle. The animals under study had a contrasting mineral content in their muscle cells. We identified candidate regulatory genes influenced by repressive epigenetic mechanisms, linking histone modification to mineral content in beef samples. The discovered candidate genes take part in multiple biological pathways, i.e., impulse transmission, cell signalling, immunological, and developmental pathways. Some of these genes were previously associated with mineral content or regulatory mechanisms. Our findings indicate that epigenetic repression can partially explain the gene expression profiles observed in muscle samples with contrasting mineral content through the candidate regulators here identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Woo Jun Shim
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia,Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mikael Boden
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | - Andressa Oliveira de Lima
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Genome Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marina Ibelli Pereira Rocha
- Post-graduation Program of Evolutionary Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Jennifer Jessica Bruscadin
- Post-graduation Program of Evolutionary Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Gerson Barreto Mourão
- Department of Agroindustry, Food and Nutrition, University of São Paulo/ESALQ, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Adhemar Zerlotini
- Bioinformatic Multi-user Laboratory, Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luiz Lehmann Coutinho
- Department of Animal Science, University of São Paulo/ESALQ, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chen S, Liu S, Shi S, Jiang Y, Cao M, Tang Y, Li W, Liu J, Fang L, Yu Y, Zhang S. Comparative epigenomics reveals the impact of ruminant-specific regulatory elements on complex traits. BMC Biol 2022; 20:273. [PMID: 36482458 PMCID: PMC9730597 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-022-01459-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insights into the genetic basis of complex traits and disease in both human and livestock species have been achieved over the past decade through detection of genetic variants in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). A majority of such variants were found located in noncoding genomic regions, and though the involvement of numerous regulatory elements (REs) has been predicted across multiple tissues in domesticated animals, their evolutionary conservation and effects on complex traits have not been fully elucidated, particularly in ruminants. Here, we systematically analyzed 137 epigenomic and transcriptomic datasets of six mammals, including cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, mice, and humans, and then integrated them with large-scale GWAS of complex traits. RESULTS Using 40 ChIP-seq datasets of H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, we detected 68,479, 58,562, 63,273, 97,244, 111,881, and 87,049 REs in the liver of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, humans and mice, respectively. We then systematically characterized the dynamic functional landscapes of these REs by integrating multi-omics datasets, including gene expression, chromatin accessibility, and DNA methylation. We identified a core set (n = 6359) of ruminant-specific REs that are involved in liver development, metabolism, and immune processes. Genes with more complex cis-REs exhibited higher gene expression levels and stronger conservation across species. Furthermore, we integrated expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and GWAS from 44 and 52 complex traits/diseases in cattle and humans, respectively. These results demonstrated that REs with different degrees of evolutionary conservation across species exhibited distinct enrichments for GWAS signals of complex traits. CONCLUSIONS We systematically annotated genome-wide functional REs in liver across six mammals and demonstrated the evolution of REs and their associations with transcriptional output and conservation. Detecting lineage-specific REs allows us to decipher the evolutionary and genetic basis of complex phenotypes in livestock and humans, which may benefit the discovery of potential biomedical models for functional variants and genes of specific human diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqian Chen
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuli Liu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shaolei Shi
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Yifan Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Mingyue Cao
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Yongjie Tang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenlong Li
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianfeng Liu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Lingzhao Fang
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ying Yu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Shengli Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jones HE, Wilson PB. Progress and opportunities through use of genomics in animal production. Trends Genet 2022; 38:1228-1252. [PMID: 35945076 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The rearing of farmed animals is a vital component of global food production systems, but its impact on the environment, human health, animal welfare, and biodiversity is being increasingly challenged. Developments in genetic and genomic technologies have had a key role in improving the productivity of farmed animals for decades. Advances in genome sequencing, annotation, and editing offer a means not only to continue that trend, but also, when combined with advanced data collection, analytics, cloud computing, appropriate infrastructure, and regulation, to take precision livestock farming (PLF) and conservation to an advanced level. Such an approach could generate substantial additional benefits in terms of reducing use of resources, health treatments, and environmental impact, while also improving animal health and welfare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huw E Jones
- UK Genetics for Livestock and Equines (UKGLE) Committee, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JR, UK; Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst Campus, Brackenhurst Lane, Southwell, NG25 0QF, UK.
| | - Philippe B Wilson
- UK Genetics for Livestock and Equines (UKGLE) Committee, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JR, UK; Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst Campus, Brackenhurst Lane, Southwell, NG25 0QF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kalds P, Huang S, Chen Y, Wang X. Ovine HOXB13: expanding the gene repertoire of sheep tail patterning and implications in genetic improvement. Commun Biol 2022; 5:1196. [DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04199-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
42
|
Mukiibi R, Peñaloza C, Gutierrez A, Yáñez JM, Houston RD, Robledo D. The impact of Piscirickettsia salmonis infection on genome-wide DNA methylation profile in Atlantic Salmon. Genomics 2022; 114:110503. [PMID: 36244592 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Salmon rickettsial septicaemia (SRS), caused by the bacteria Piscirickettsia salmonis (P. salmonis), is responsible for significant mortality in farmed Atlantic salmon in Chile. Currently there are no effective treatments or preventive measures for this disease, although genetic selection or genome engineering to increase salmon resistance to SRS are promising strategies. The accuracy and efficiency of these strategies are usually influenced by the available biological background knowledge of the disease. The aim of this study was to investigate DNA methylation changes in response to P. salmonis infection in the head kidney and liver tissue of Atlantic salmon, and the interaction between gene expression and DNA methylation in the same tissues. The head kidney and liver methylomes of 66 juvenile salmon were profiled using reduced representation bisulphite sequencing (RRBS), and compared between P. salmonis infected animals (3 and 9 days post infection) and uninfected controls, and between SRS resistant and susceptible fish. Methylation was correlated with matching RNA-Seq data from the same animals, revealing that methylation in the first exon leads to an important repression of gene expression. Head kidney methylation showed a clear response to the infection, associated with immunological processes such as actin cytoskeleton regulation, phagocytosis, endocytosis and pathogen associated pattern receptor signaling. Our results contribute to the growing understanding of the role of methylation in regulation of gene expression and response to infectious diseases and could inform the incorporation of epigenetic markers into genomic selection for disease resistant and the design of diagnostic epigenetic markers to better manage fish health in salmon aquaculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Mukiibi
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Carolina Peñaloza
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alejandro Gutierrez
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Institute of Aquaculture, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
| | - José M Yáñez
- Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Center for Research and Innovation in Aquaculture (CRIA), Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ross D Houston
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Diego Robledo
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Guan D, Halstead MM, Islas-Trejo AD, Goszczynski DE, Cheng HH, Ross PJ, Zhou H. Prediction of transcript isoforms in 19 chicken tissues by Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing. Front Genet 2022; 13:997460. [PMID: 36246588 PMCID: PMC9561881 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.997460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
To identify and annotate transcript isoforms in the chicken genome, we generated Nanopore long-read sequencing data from 68 samples that encompassed 19 diverse tissues collected from experimental adult male and female White Leghorn chickens. More than 23.8 million reads with mean read length of 790 bases and average quality of 18.2 were generated. The annotation and subsequent filtering resulted in the identification of 55,382 transcripts at 40,547 loci with mean length of 1,700 bases. We predicted 30,967 coding transcripts at 19,461 loci, and 16,495 lncRNA transcripts at 15,512 loci. Compared to existing reference annotations, we found ∼52% of annotated transcripts could be partially or fully matched while ∼47% were novel. Seventy percent of novel transcripts were potentially transcribed from lncRNA loci. Based on our annotation, we quantified transcript expression across tissues and found two brain tissues (i.e., cerebellum and cortex) expressed the highest number of transcripts and loci. Furthermore, ∼22% of the transcripts displayed tissue specificity with the reproductive tissues (i.e., testis and ovary) exhibiting the most tissue-specific transcripts. Despite our wide sampling, ∼20% of Ensembl reference loci were not detected. This suggests that deeper sequencing and additional samples that include different breeds, cell types, developmental stages, and physiological conditions, are needed to fully annotate the chicken genome. The application of Nanopore sequencing in this study demonstrates the usefulness of long-read data in discovering additional novel loci (e.g., lncRNA loci) and resolving complex transcripts (e.g., the longest transcript for the TTN locus).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Michelle M. Halstead
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Alma D. Islas-Trejo
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Daniel E. Goszczynski
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Hans H. Cheng
- USDA, ARS, USNPRC, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Pablo J. Ross
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Pablo J. Ross, ; Huaijun Zhou,
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Pablo J. Ross, ; Huaijun Zhou,
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Animal board invited review: Widespread adoption of genetic technologies is key to sustainable expansion of global aquaculture. Animal 2022; 16:100642. [PMID: 36183431 PMCID: PMC9553672 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The extent of application of genetic technologies to aquaculture production varies widely by species and geography. Achieving a more universal application of seed derived from scientifically based breeding programmes is an important goal in order to meet increasing global demands for seafood production. This article reviews the status of genetic technologies across the world’s top 10 highly produced species. Opportunities and barriers to achieving broad-scale uptake of genetic technologies in global aquaculture are discussed. A future outlook for potential disruptive genetic technologies and how they might affect global aquaculture production is given.
Aquaculture production comprises a diverse range of species, geographies, and farming systems. The application of genetics and breeding technologies towards improved production is highly variable, ranging from the use of wild-sourced seed through to advanced family breeding programmes augmented by genomic techniques. This technical variation exists across some of the most highly produced species globally, with several of the top ten global species by volume generally lacking well-managed breeding programmes. Given the well-documented incremental and cumulative benefits of genetic improvement on production, this is a major missed opportunity. This short review focusses on (i) the status of application of selective breeding in the world’s most produced aquaculture species, (ii) the range of genetic technologies available and the opportunities they present, and (iii) a future outlook towards realising the potential contribution of genetic technologies to aquaculture sustainability and global food security.
Collapse
|
45
|
Liu S, Gao Y, Canela-Xandri O, Wang S, Yu Y, Cai W, Li B, Xiang R, Chamberlain AJ, Pairo-Castineira E, D’Mellow K, Rawlik K, Xia C, Yao Y, Navarro P, Rocha D, Li X, Yan Z, Li C, Rosen BD, Van Tassell CP, Vanraden PM, Zhang S, Ma L, Cole JB, Liu GE, Tenesa A, Fang L. A multi-tissue atlas of regulatory variants in cattle. Nat Genet 2022; 54:1438-1447. [PMID: 35953587 PMCID: PMC7613894 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-022-01153-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Characterization of genetic regulatory variants acting on livestock gene expression is essential for interpreting the molecular mechanisms underlying traits of economic value and for increasing the rate of genetic gain through artificial selection. Here we build a Cattle Genotype-Tissue Expression atlas (CattleGTEx) as part of the pilot phase of the Farm animal GTEx (FarmGTEx) project for the research community based on 7,180 publicly available RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) samples. We describe the transcriptomic landscape of more than 100 tissues/cell types and report hundreds of thousands of genetic associations with gene expression and alternative splicing for 23 distinct tissues. We evaluate the tissue-sharing patterns of these genetic regulatory effects, and functionally annotate them using multiomics data. Finally, we link gene expression in different tissues to 43 economically important traits using both transcriptome-wide association and colocalization analyses to decipher the molecular regulatory mechanisms underpinning such agronomic traits in cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuli Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China
| | - Yahui Gao
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
| | - Oriol Canela-Xandri
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Sheng Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China
| | - Ying Yu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Wentao Cai
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Bingjie Li
- Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Roslin Institute Building, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Ruidong Xiang
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - Amanda J. Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - Erola Pairo-Castineira
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Kenton D’Mellow
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Konrad Rawlik
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Charley Xia
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
| | - Yuelin Yao
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Pau Navarro
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Dominique Rocha
- INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, F-78350, France
| | - Xiujin Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Waterfowl Healthy Breeding, College of Animal Science & Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510225, China
| | - Ze Yan
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Congjun Li
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
| | - Benjamin D. Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
| | - Curtis P. Van Tassell
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
| | - Paul M. Vanraden
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
| | - Shengli Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
| | - John B. Cole
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
| | - George E. Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
| | - Albert Tenesa
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Lingzhao Fang
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
The CattleGTEx atlas reveals regulatory mechanisms underlying complex traits. Nat Genet 2022; 54:1273-1274. [PMID: 36008711 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-022-01155-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
47
|
Nash T, Vervelde L. Advances, challenges and future applications of avian intestinal in vitro models. Avian Pathol 2022; 51:317-329. [PMID: 35638458 DOI: 10.1080/03079457.2022.2084363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
There is a rapidly growing interest in how the avian intestine is affected by dietary components and probiotic microorganisms, as well as its role in the spread of infectious diseases in both the developing and developed world. A paucity of physiologically relevant models has limited research in this essential field of poultry gut health and led to an over-reliance on the use of live birds for experiments. The intestine is characterized by a complex cellular composition with numerous functions, unique dynamic locations and interdependencies making this organ challenging to recreate in vitro. This review illustrates the in vitro tools that aim to recapitulate this intestinal environment; from the simplest cell lines, which mimic select features of the intestine but lack anatomical and physiological complexity, to the more recently developed complex 3D enteroids, which recreate more of the intestine's intricate microanatomy, heterogeneous cell populations and signalling gradients. We highlight the benefits and limitations of in vitro intestinal models and describe their current applications and future prospective utilizations in intestinal biology and pathology research. We also describe the scope to improve on the current systems to include, for example, microbiota and a dynamic mechanical environment, vital components which enable the intestine to develop and maintain homeostasis in vivo. As this review explains, no one model is perfect, but the key to choosing a model or combination of models is to carefully consider the purpose or scientific question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Nash
- The Roslin Institute & R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lonneke Vervelde
- The Roslin Institute & R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Burger PA, Ciani E. Structural and functional genomics in Old World camels-where do we stand and where to go. Anim Front 2022; 12:30-34. [PMID: 35974786 PMCID: PMC9374506 DOI: 10.1093/af/vfac047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela A Burger
- Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1160 Vienna, Austria
| | - Elena Ciani
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chen Z, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Wang Q, Pan Y. Heterozygosity and homozygosity regions affect reproductive success and the loss of reproduction: a case study with litter traits in pigs. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022; 20:4060-4071. [PMID: 35983229 PMCID: PMC9364102 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Runs of heterozygosity (ROHet) and homozygosity (ROH) harbor useful information related to traits of interest. There is a lack of investigating the effect of ROHet and ROH on reproductive success and the loss of reproduction in mammals. Here, we detected and characterized the ROHet and ROH patterns in the genomes of Chinese indigenous pigs (i.e., Jinhua, Chun’an, Longyou Black, and Shengxian Spotted pigs), revealing the similar genetic characteristics of indigenous pigs. Later, we highlighted the underlying litter traits-related ROHet and ROH using association analysis with linear model in these four indigenous pig breeds. To pinpoint the promising candidate genes associated with litter traits, we further in-depth explore the selection patterns of other five pig breeds (i.e., Erhualian, Meishan, Minzhu, Rongchang, and Diqing pigs) with different levels of reproduction performance at the underlying litter traits-related ROHet and ROH using FST and genetic diversity ratio. Then, we identified a set of known and novel candidate genes associated with reproductive performance in pigs. For the novel candidate genes (i.e., CCDC91, SASH1, SAMD5, MACF1, MFSD2A, EPC2, and MBD5), we obtained public available datasets and performed multi-omics analyses integrating transcriptome-wide association studies and comparative single-cell RNA-seq analyses to uncover the roles of them in mammalian reproductive performance. The genes have not been widely reported to be fertility-related genes and can be complementally considered as prior biological information to modify genomic selections models that benefits pig genetic improvement of litter traits. Besides, our findings provide new insights into the function of ROHet and ROH in mammals.
Collapse
|
50
|
Xiang R, Fang L, Sanchez MP, Cheng H, Zhang Z. Editorial: Multi-Layered Genome-Wide Association/Prediction in Animals. Front Genet 2022; 13:877748. [PMID: 35464854 PMCID: PMC9023786 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.877748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ruidong Xiang
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
- *Correspondence: Ruidong Xiang,
| | - Lingzhao Fang
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hao Cheng
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Zhe Zhang
- College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|