A novel method for interpreting survival analysis data: description and test on three major clinical trials on cardiovascular prevention

Microvascular Inflammation and Cardiovascular Prevention: The Role of Microcirculation as Earlier Determinant of Cardiovascular Risk

Healthcare systems encumbered by cardiovascular diseases demand adequate cardiovascular prevention. Indeed, even with the most novel therapies, the residual cardiovascular risk still fuels morbidity and mortality. Addressing inflammation as a putative mediator of this risk has brought along promising in vitro results, though large clinical trials have only in part confirmed them. To fully exploit the therapeutic potential between the inflammatory hypothesis, a change of viewpoint is required. Focus on microcirculation, whose dysfunction is the primary driver of cardiometabolic disease, is mandatory. Several factors play a pivotal role in the capacity of microvascular inflammation to promote a health-to-disease transition: the adipose tissue (in particular, perivascular and epicardial), the mitochondria function, the hyperglycemic damage and their epigenetic signature. Indeed, the low-grade inflammatory response, which is now an acknowledged hallmark of cardiometabolic disease, is promoted by these mediators and leaves a permanent epigenetic scar on the microvasculature. Even if a more profound knowledge about the mechanisms of metabolic memory has been brought to light by recent evidence, we still have to fully understand its mechanisms and clinical potential. Addressing the detrimental role of inflammation by targeting the microvascular phenotype and leveraging epigenetics is the road down which we must go to achieve satisfactory cardiovascular prevention, ultimately leading to disease-free ageing.

Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors on cardiac structure and function: a narrative review of clinical evidence

The impressive results of recent clinical trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) and sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in terms of cardiovascular protection prompted a huge interest in these agents for heart failure (HF) prevention and treatment. While both classes show positive effects on composite cardiovascular endpoints (i.e. 3P MACE), their actions on the cardiac function and structure, as well as on volume regulation, and their impact on HF-related events have not been systematically evaluated and compared. In this narrative review, we summarize and critically interpret the available evidence emerging from clinical studies. While chronic exposure to GLP-1Ra appears to be essentially neutral on both systolic and diastolic function, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a beneficial impact of SGLT-2i is consistently detectable for both systolic and diastolic function parameters in subjects with diabetes with and without HF, with a gradient proportional to the severity of baseline dysfunction. SGLT-2i have a clinically significant impact in terms of HF hospitalization prevention in subjects at high and very high cardiovascular risk both with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D) or HF, while GLP-1Ra have been proven to be safe (and marginally beneficial) in subjects with T2D without HF. We suggest that the role of the kidney is crucial for the effect of SGLT-2i on the clinical outcomes not only because these drugs slow-down the time-dependent decline of kidney function and enhance the response to diuretics, but also because they attenuate the meal-related anti-natriuretic pressure (lowering postprandial hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia and preventing proximal sodium reabsorption), which would reduce the individual sensitivity to day-to-day variations in dietary sodium intake.

Rethinking pioglitazone as a cardioprotective agent: a new perspective on an overlooked drug

Since 1985, the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone has been widely used as an insulin sensitizer drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although fluid retention was early recognized as a safety concern, data from clinical trials have not provided conclusive evidence for a benefit or a harm on cardiac function, leaving the question unanswered. We reviewed the available evidence encompassing both in vitro and in vivo studies in tissues, isolated organs, animals and humans, including the evidence generated by major clinical trials. Despite the increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure due to fluid retention, pioglitazone is consistently associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke both in primary and secondary prevention, without any proven direct harm on the myocardium. Moreover, it reduces atherosclerosis progression, in-stent restenosis after coronary stent implantation, progression rate from persistent to permanent atrial fibrillation, and reablation rate in diabetic patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. In fact, human and animal studies consistently report direct beneficial effects on cardiomyocytes electrophysiology, energetic metabolism, ischemia–reperfusion injury, cardiac remodeling, neurohormonal activation, pulmonary circulation and biventricular systo-diastolic functions. The mechanisms involved may rely either on anti-remodeling properties (endothelium protective, inflammation-modulating, anti-proliferative and anti-fibrotic properties) and/or on metabolic (adipose tissue metabolism, increased HDL cholesterol) and neurohormonal (renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, sympathetic nervous system, and adiponectin) modulation of the cardiovascular system. With appropriate prescription and titration, pioglitazone remains a useful tool in the arsenal of the clinical diabetologist.