The role of basket trials in drug development for neurodegenerative disorders

Biomarker-guided decision making in clinical drug development for neurodegenerative disorders

Neurodegenerative disorders are characterized by complex neurobiological changes that are reflected in biomarker alterations detectable in blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and with brain imaging. As accessible proxies for processes that are difficult to measure, biomarkers are tools that hold increasingly important roles in drug development and clinical trial decision making. In the past few years, biomarkers have been the basis for accelerated approval of new therapies for Alzheimer disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as surrogate end points reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit.Blood-based biomarkers are emerging for Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders (for example, Parkinson disease, frontotemporal dementia), and some biomarkers may be informative across multiple disease states. Collection of CSF provides access to biomarkers not available in plasma, including markers of synaptic dysfunction and neuroinflammation. Molecular imaging is identifying an increasing array of targets, including amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction and synaptic density. In this Review, we consider how biomarkers can be implemented in clinical trials depending on their context of use, including providing information on disease risk and/or susceptibility, diagnosis, prognosis, pharmacodynamic outcomes, monitoring, prediction of response to therapy and safety. Informed choice of increasingly available biomarkers and rational deployment in clinical trials support drug development decision making and de-risk the drug development process for neurodegenerative disorders.

SIMPATHIC: Accelerating drug repurposing for rare diseases by exploiting SIMilarities in clinical and molecular PATHology

Rare diseases affect over 400 million people worldwide, with approved treatment available for less than 6 % of these diseases. Drug repurposing is a key strategy in the development of therapies for rare disease patients with large unmet medical needs. The process of repurposing drugs compared to novel drug development is a time-saving and cost-efficient method potentially resulting in higher success rates. To accelerate and ensure sustainability in therapy development for rare neurometabolic, neurological, and neuromuscular diseases, an international consortium SIMilarities in clinical and molecular PATHology (SIMPATHIC) has been established where we move away from the one drug one disease concept and move towards one drug targeting a pathomechanism shared between diseases, by applying parallel preclinical and clinical drug development. Here the consortium describes accelerators of drug repurposing pursued by the consortium, including 1) co-creation, 2) patient empowerment, 3) use of standardized induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived disease models and cellular and molecular profiling, 4) high-throughput drug screening in neurons, 5) innovative clinical trial design, and 6) selection of appropriate exploitation and patient access models. In this way, a fast and effective drug repurposing pathway for several rare diseases will be established to reduce time from discovery to patient access.

Use of Basket Trials to Solve Sleep Problems in Patients with Rare Diseases

The need for sleep is universal, and the ability to meet this need impacts the quality of life for patients, families, and caregivers. Although substantial progress has been made in treating rare diseases, many patients have unmet medical sleep needs, and current regulatory policy makes it prohibitively difficult to address those needs medically. This opinion reviews the rare disease experience with sleep disorders and explores potential solutions. First, we provide case profiles for the rare diseases Wilson's Disease, Angelman Syndrome, and Prader-Willi Syndrome. These profiles highlight challenges in rare disease diagnosis and barriers to pinpointing disease pathophysiology, including biomarkers that intersect with sleep disorders. Second, we transition to a bird's eye view of sleep disorders and rare diseases by reporting input from a stakeholder discussion with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding abnormal sleep patterns in various rare diseases. Last, in response to the profound unmet medical needs of patients with rare diseases and sleep disorders, we propose adapting and using the clinical trial design known as a "basket trial". In this case, a basket trial would include patients with different rare diseases but the same debilitating symptoms. This research approach has the potential to benefit many rare disease patients who are otherwise left with profound unmet medical needs.

Alzheimer's Disease: Combination Therapies and Clinical Trials for Combination Therapy Development

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex multifaceted disease. Recently approved anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies slow disease progression by approximately 30%, and combination therapy appears necessary to prevent the onset of AD or produce greater slowing of cognitive and functional decline. Combination therapies may address core features, non-specific co-pathology commonly occurring in patients with AD (e.g., inflammation), or non-AD pathologies that may co-occur with AD (e.g., α-synuclein). Combination therapies may be advanced through co-development of more than one new molecular entity or through add-on strategies including an approved agent plus a new molecular entity. Addressing add-on combination therapy is currently urgent since patients on anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies may be included in clinical trials for experimental agents. Phase 1 information must be generated for each agent in combination drug development. Phase 2 and Phase 3 of add-on therapies may contrast the new molecular entity, the approved agent as standard of care, and the combination. More complex development programs including standard or modified combinatorial designs are required for co-development of two or more new molecular entities. Biomarkers are markedly affected by anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, and these effects must be anticipated in add-on trials. Examining target engagement biomarkers and comparing the magnitude and sequence of biomarker changes in those receiving more than one therapy, compared with those on monotherapy, may be informative. Using network-based medicine approaches, computational strategies may identify rational combinations using disease and drug effect network mapping.

Advancing randomized controlled trial methodologies: The place of innovative trial design in eating disorders research

Randomized controlled trials can be used to generate evidence on the efficacy and safety of new treatments in eating disorders research. Many of the trials previously conducted in this area have been deemed to be of low quality, in part due to a number of practical constraints. This article provides an overview of established and more innovative clinical trial designs, accompanied by pertinent examples, to highlight how design choices can enhance flexibility and improve efficiency of both resource allocation and participant involvement. Trial designs include individually randomized, cluster randomized, and designs with randomizations at multiple time points and/or addressing several research questions (master protocol studies). Design features include the use of adaptations and considerations for pragmatic or registry-based trials. The appropriate choice of trial design, together with rigorous trial conduct, reporting and analysis, can establish high-quality evidence to advance knowledge in the field. It is anticipated that this article will provide a broad and contemporary introduction to trial designs and will help researchers make informed trial design choices for improved testing of new interventions in eating disorders. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: There is a paucity of high quality randomized controlled trials that have been conducted in eating disorders, highlighting the need to identify where efficiency gains in trial design may be possible to advance the eating disorder research field. We provide an overview of some key trial designs and features which may offer solutions to practical constraints and increase trial efficiency.

Special Issue 'Advances in Neurodegenerative Diseases Research and Therapy 2.0'

Neurodegenerative disorders (NDs) and the development of various therapeutic strategies to combat them have received increased attention in recent decades [...].

Cannabidiol (Epidyolex®) for severe behavioral manifestations in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex, mucopolysaccharidosis type III and fragile X syndrome: protocol for a series of randomized, placebo-controlled N-of-1 trials

BACKGROUND

Many rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders (RGNDs) are characterized by intellectual disability (ID), severe cognitive and behavioral impairments, potentially diagnosed as a comorbid autism spectrum disorder or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Quality of life is often impaired due to irritability, aggression and self-injurious behavior, generally refractory to standard therapies. There are indications from previous (case) studies and patient reporting that cannabidiol (CBD) may be an effective treatment for severe behavioral manifestations in RGNDs. However, clear evidence is lacking and interventional research is challenging due to the rarity as well as the heterogeneity within and between disease groups and interindividual differences in treatment response. Our objective is to examine the effectiveness of CBD on severe behavioral manifestations in three RGNDs, including Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), mucopolysaccharidosis type III (MPS III), and Fragile X syndrome (FXS), using an innovative trial design.

METHODS

We aim to conduct placebo-controlled, double-blind, block-randomized, multiple crossover N-of-1 studies with oral CBD (twice daily) in 30 patients (aged ≥ 6 years) with confirmed TSC, MPS III or FXS and severe behavioral manifestations. The treatment is oral CBD up to a maximum of 25 mg/kg/day, twice daily. The primary outcome measure is the subscale irritability of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist. Secondary outcome measures include (personalized) patient-reported outcome measures with regard to behavioral and psychiatric outcomes, disease-specific outcome measures, parental stress, seizure frequency, and adverse effects of CBD. Questionnaires will be completed and study medication will be taken at the participants' natural setting. Individual treatment effects will be determined based on summary statistics. A mixed model analysis will be applied for analyzing the effectiveness of the intervention per disorder and across disorders combining data from the individual N-of-1 trials.

DISCUSSION

These N-of-1 trials address an unmet medical need and will provide information on the effectiveness of CBD for severe behavioral manifestations in RGNDs, potentially generating generalizable knowledge at an individual-, disorder- and RGND population level.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2021-003250-23, registered 25 August 2022, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2021-003250-23/NL .

Towards a multi-arm multi-stage platform trial of disease modifying approaches in Parkinson's disease

An increase in the efficiency of clinical trial conduct has been successfully demonstrated in the oncology field, by the use of multi-arm, multi-stage trials allowing the evaluation of multiple therapeutic candidates simultaneously, and seamless recruitment to phase 3 for those candidates passing an interim signal of efficacy. Replicating this complex innovative trial design in diseases such as Parkinson's disease is appealing, but in addition to the challenges associated with any trial assessing a single potentially disease modifying intervention in Parkinson's disease, a multi-arm platform trial must also specifically consider the heterogeneous nature of the disease, alongside the desire to potentially test multiple treatments with different mechanisms of action. In a multi-arm trial, there is a need to appropriately stratify treatment arms to ensure each are comparable with a shared placebo/standard of care arm; however, in Parkinson's disease there may be a preference to enrich an arm with a subgroup of patients that may be most likely to respond to a specific treatment approach. The solution to this conundrum lies in having clearly defined criteria for inclusion in each treatment arm as well as an analysis plan that takes account of predefined subgroups of interest, alongside evaluating the impact of each treatment on the broader population of Parkinson's disease patients. Beyond this, there must be robust processes of treatment selection, and consensus derived measures to confirm target engagement and interim assessments of efficacy, as well as consideration of the infrastructure needed to support recruitment, and the long-term funding and sustainability of the platform. This has to incorporate the diverse priorities of clinicians, triallists, regulatory authorities and above all the views of people with Parkinson's disease.

Tau pathology in neurodegenerative disease: disease mechanisms and therapeutic avenues

Tauopathies are disorders associated with tau protein dysfunction and insoluble tau accumulation in the brain at autopsy. Multiple lines of evidence from human disease, as well as nonclinical translational models, suggest that tau has a central pathologic role in these disorders, historically thought to be primarily related to tau gain of toxic function. However, a number of tau-targeting therapies with various mechanisms of action have shown little promise in clinical trials in different tauopathies. We review what is known about tau biology, genetics, and therapeutic mechanisms that have been tested in clinical trials to date. We discuss possible reasons for failures of these therapies, such as use of imperfect nonclinical models that do not predict human effects for drug development; heterogeneity of human tau pathologies which may lead to variable responses to therapy; and ineffective therapeutic mechanisms, such as targeting of the wrong tau species or protein epitope. Innovative approaches to human clinical trials can help address some of the difficulties that have plagued our field's development of tau-targeting therapies thus far. Despite limited clinical success to date, as we continue to refine our understanding of tau's pathogenic mechanism(s) in different neurodegenerative diseases, we remain optimistic that tau-targeting therapies will eventually play a central role in the treatment of tauopathies.

Dementia with Lewy Bodies Drug Therapies in Clinical Trials: Systematic Review up to 2022

INTRODUCTION

Reviews of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are essential for informing ongoing research efforts of symptomatic therapies and potentially disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of all clinical trials conducted until September 27, 2022, by examining 3 international registries: ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, to identify drugs in trials in DLB.

RESULTS

We found 25 agents in 40 trials assessing symptomatic treatments and DMTs for DLB: 7 phase 3, 31 phase 2, and 2 phase 1 trials. We found an active pipeline for drug development in DLB, with most ongoing clinical trials in phase 2. We identified a recent trend towards including participants at the prodromal stages, although more than half of active clinical trials will enroll mild to moderate dementia patients. Additionally, repurposed agents are frequently tested, representing 65% of clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

Current challenges in DLB clinical trials include the need for disease-specific outcome measures and biomarkers, and improving representation of global and diverse populations.

Accelerated neuronal aging in vitro ∼melting watch ∼

In developed countries, the aging of the population and the associated increase in age-related diseases are causing major unresolved medical, social, and environmental matters. Therefore, research on aging has become one of the most important and urgent issues in life sciences. If the molecular mechanisms of the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases are elucidated, we can expect to develop disease-modifying methods to prevent neurodegeneration itself. Since the discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), there has been an explosion of disease models using disease-specific iPSCs derived from patient-derived somatic cells. By inducing the differentiation of iPSCs into neurons, disease models that reflect the patient-derived pathology can be reproduced in culture dishes, and are playing an active role in elucidating new pathological mechanisms and as a platform for new drug discovery. At the same time, however, we are faced with a new problem: how to recapitulate aging in culture dishes. It has been pointed out that cells differentiated from pluripotent stem cells are juvenile, retain embryonic traits, and may not be fully mature. Therefore, attempts are being made to induce cell maturation, senescence, and stress signals through culture conditions. It has also been reported that direct conversion of fibroblasts into neurons can reproduce human neurons with an aged phenotype. Here, we outline some state-of-the-art insights into models of neuronal aging in vitro. New frontiers in which stem cells and methods for inducing differentiation of tissue regeneration can be applied to aging research are just now approaching, and we need to keep a close eye on them. These models are forefront and intended to advance our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of aging and contribute to the development of novel therapies for human neurodegenerative diseases associated with aging.