18F-FDG and 68Ga-somatostatin analogs PET/CT in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: a comparison study

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs for Cancer Imaging

Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are expressed by many tumours especially those related to neuro-endocrine origin and molecular functional imaging of SSTR expression using radiolabelled somatostatin analogs have revolutionized imaging of patients with these group of malignancies. Coming a long way from the first radiolabelled somatostatin analog 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide, there has been significant developments in terms of radionuclides used, the ligands and somatostatin derivatives. 111In-Pentetreotide extensively employed for imaging NETs at the beginning has now been replaced by 68Ga-SSA based PET-CT. SSA-PET/CT performs superior to conventional imaging modalities and has evolved in the mainframe for NET imaging. The advantages were multiple: (i) superior spatial resolution of PET versus SPECT, (ii) quantitative capabilities of PET aiding in disease activity and treatment response monitoring with better precision, (iii) shorter scan time and (iv) less patient exposure to radiation. The modality is indicated for staging, detecting the primary in CUP-NETs, restaging, treatment planning (along with FDG: the concept of dual-tracer PET-CT) as well as treatment response evaluation and follow-up of NETs. SSA PET/CT has also been incorporated in the guidelines for imaging of Pheochromocytoma-Paraganglioma, Medullary carcinoma thyroid, Meningioma and Tumor induced osteomalacia. At present, there is rising interest on (a) 18F-labelled SSA, (b) 64Cu-labelled SSA, and (c) somatostatin antagonists. 18F offers excellent imaging properties, 64Cu makes delayed imaging feasible which has implications in dosimetry and SSTR antagonists bind with the SST receptors with high affinity and specificity, providing high contrast images with less background, which can be translated to theranostics effectively. SSTR have been demonstrated in non-neuroendocrine tumours as well in the peer-reviewed literature, with studies demonstrating the potential of SSA PET/CT in Neuroblastoma, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, carcinoma prostate (neuroendocrine differentiation) and lymphoma. This review will focus on the currently available SSAs and their history, different SPECT/PET agents, SSTR antagonists, comparison between the various imaging tracers, and their utility in both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors.

Moderne Diagnostik und Therapie des Merkelzellkarzinoms

Das Merkelzellkarzinom (MCC) ist ein seltener, aggressiver Hauttumor mit epithelialer und neuroendokriner Differenzierung, dessen Inzidenz in den letzten Jahrzehnten deutlich zugenommen hat. Risikofaktoren sind fortgeschrittenes Lebensalter, heller Hauttyp, UV‐Exposition und Immunsuppression. Pathogenetisch wird ein durch das Merkelzell‐Polyomavirus (MCPyV) hervorgerufener Typ von einem UV‐induzierten Typ mit hoher Tumormutationslast unterschieden.

Klinisch präsentiert sich das MCC als meist schmerzloser, schnell wachsender, rötlich‐violetter Tumor mit glänzender Oberfläche, der bevorzugt im Kopf‐Hals‐Bereich und an den distalen Extremitäten lokalisiert ist. Eine sichere Diagnose kann nur anhand histologischer und immunhistochemischer Merkmale gestellt werden. Bei Erstdiagnose weisen 20%–26% der Patienten lokoregionäre Metastasen und 8%–14% Fernmetastasen auf, weshalb eine Ausbreitungsdiagnostik unabdingbar ist. Bei fehlenden klinischen Hinweisen auf Metastasen wird eine Sentinel‐Lymphknotenbiopsie empfohlen.

Wesentliche Säulen der Therapie sind die Operation, die adjuvante oder palliative Strahlentherapie und in fortgeschrittenen inoperablen Stadien die medikamentöse Tumortherapie. Die Einführung von Immuncheckpoint‐Inhibitoren führte zu einem Paradigmenwechsel, da sich hiermit ein wesentlich langfristigeres Ansprechen und bessere Überlebensraten als mit Chemotherapie erreichen lassen. Zur Therapie des metastasierten MCC ist in Deutschland der PD‐L1‐Inhibitor Avelumab zugelassen, aber auch die PD‐1‐Antikörper Pembrolizumab und Nivolumab werden mit Erfolg eingesetzt. Adjuvante und neoadjuvante Therapiekonzepte, Immunkombinationstherapien und zielgerichtete Therapien als Monotherapie oder in Kombination mit Immuncheckpoint‐Inhibitoren befinden sich in klinischer Prüfung.

Modern diagnostics and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer with epithelial and neuroendocrine differentiation, the incidence of which has increased substantially during the last decades. Risk factors include advanced age, fair skin type, UV exposure, and immunosuppression. Pathogenetically, a type caused by the Merkel cell polyomavirus is distinguished from a UV-induced type with a high tumor mutational burden. Clinically, MCC presents as a mostly painless, rapidly growing, reddish-violet tumor with a shiny surface, which is preferentially localized in the head-neck region and at the distal extremities. A reliable diagnosis can only be made based on histological and immunohistochemical features. At initial diagnosis, 20-26% of patients show locoregional metastases and 8-14% distant metastases, making staging examinations indispensable. If there is no clinical evidence of metastases, a sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended. Essential columns of therapy are surgery, adjuvant or palliative radiotherapy and, in advanced inoperable stages, medicamentous tumor therapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift, as they provide a considerably longer duration of response and better survival rates than chemotherapy. The PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab is approved for treatment of metastatic MCC in Germany, but the PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab are also used with success. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment concepts, immune combination therapies and targeted therapies as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors are in the clinical trial phase.

Skin Malignancies: Imaging Review with Radiologic-Histopathologic Correlation

Skin malignancies are commonly encountered as primary or incidental findings. Neoplasms that affect the skin include primary (basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma) and secondary (mesenchymal neoplasms, lymphoma, and metastases) tumors. Imaging provides valuable anatomic information (tumor size, depth of involvement, presence of distant metastasis, and data for guiding biopsy) and functional information (metabolic activity and sentinel node mapping data). This information, in addition to biopsy results, improves the histopathologic characterization of tumors and treatment planning. Various histopathologic types of the same entity exhibit different biologic behavior and have different imaging features. Familiarity with the multimodality imaging features, histopathologic characteristics, and various modes of dissemination (direct invasion; perineural, lymphatic, and hematogenous spread) of the most common skin malignancies helps radiologists narrow the differential diagnosis in clinical practice. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Now you see me: lights on Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) is a rare primary cutaneous cancer with aggressive behaviour and poor prognosis. Although MCC cells express somatostatin receptors (SSTR), SSTR-targeted PET/CT is not routinely performed in clinical practice. In contrast, the use of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is more widespread and its prognostic role is well established. We present the case of an MCC patient suspected recurrence who underwent restaging with both [¹⁸F]FDG and [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT. [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT showed pathological uptake only in mediastinal lymph nodes, but SSTR imaging also revealed multiple liver and skeletal metastases, leading to significant disease upstaging and relevant changes in the therapeutic management.

An update on Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cancer of the skin characterized by a neuroendocrine phenotype and an aggressive clinical behavior. It frequently originates in sun-exposed body areas, and its incidence has steadily increased in the last three decades. Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure are the main causative agents of MCC, and distinct molecular features have been documented in virus-positive and virus-negative malignancies. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for localized tumors, but even when integrated with adjuvant radiotherapy is able to definitively cure only a fraction of MCC patients. While characterized by a high objective response rate, chemotherapy is associated with a short-lasting benefit of approximately 3 months. On the other hand, immune checkpoint inhibitors including avelumab and pembrolizumab have demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with stage IV MCC, and investigations on their use in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting are currently underway. Addressing the needs of those patients who do not persistently benefit from immunotherapy is currently one of the most compelling unmet needs in the field, and multiple clinical trials of new tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), therapeutic vaccines, immunocytokines as well as innovative forms of adoptive cellular immunotherapies are under clinical scrutiny at present.

S2k Guideline - Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin) - Update 2022

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, ICD-O M8247/3) is a rare, malignant, primary skin tumor with epithelial and neuroendocrine differentiation. The tumor cells share many morphologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features with cutaneous Merkel cells. Nevertheless, the cell of origin of MCC is unclear. MCC appears clinically as a reddish to purple spherical tumor with a smooth, shiny surface and a soft to turgid, elastic consistency, usually showing rapid growth. Spontaneous and often complete regressions of the tumor are observed. These likely immunologically-mediated regressions explain the cases in which only lymph node or distant metastases are found at the time of initial diagnosis and why the tumor responds very well to immunomodulatory therapies even at advanced stages. Due to its aggressiveness, the usually given indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy, the indication of adjuvant therapies to be evaluated, as well as the complexity of the necessary diagnostics, clinical management should already be determined by an interdisciplinary tumor board at the time of initial diagnosis.

Diagnostic Test Accuracy of 18 F-FDG PET or PET/CT in Merkel Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracies of 18 F-FDG PET or PET/CT for diagnosis of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane database, and EMBASE database, from January 1990 to January 31, 2022, were searched for studies evaluating diagnostic performance of 18 F-FDG PET or PET/CT for MCC. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Across 9 studies (259 patients), the pooled sensitivity of 18 F-FDG PET or PET/CT was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.95) and a pooled specificity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97). Likelihood ratio syntheses gave an overall LR+ of 14.0 (95% CI, 6.6-29.6) and LR- of 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05-0.17). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 153 (95% CI, 57-416).

CONCLUSION

18 F-FDG PET/CT showed an excellent performance for diagnosis of MCC. The likelihood ratio scattergram indicated that 18 F-FDG PET or PET/CT is useful for exclusion and confirmation of MCC. Further large multicenter studies would be necessary to substantiate the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-FDG PET or PET/CT for MCC patients.

Diagnosis and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline - Update 2022

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin cancer, accounting for less than 1% of all cutaneous malignancies. It is found predominantly in white populations and risk factors include advanced age, ultraviolet exposure, male sex, immunosuppression, such as AIDS/HIV infection, haematological malignancies or solid organ transplantation, and Merkel cell polyomavirus infection. MCC is an aggressive tumour with 26% of cases presenting lymph node involvement at diagnosis and 8% with distant metastases. Five-year overall survival rates range between 48% and 63%. Two subsets of MCC have been characterised with distinct molecular pathogenetic pathways: ultraviolet-induced MCC versus virus-positive MCC, which carries a better prognosis. In both subtypes, there are alterations in the retinoblastoma protein and p53 gene structure and function. MCC typically manifests as a red nodule or plaque with fast growth, most commonly on sun exposed areas. Histopathology (small-cell neuroendocrine appearance) and immunohistochemistry (CK20 positivity and TTF-1 negativity) confirm the diagnosis. The current staging systems are the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for international Cancer control 8th edition. Baseline whole body imaging is encouraged to rule out regional and distant metastasis. For localised MCC, first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended in all patients with MCC without clinically detectable lymph nodes or distant metastasis. Adjuvant RT alone, eventually combined with complete lymph nodes dissection is proposed in case of micrometastatic nodal involvement. In case of macroscopic nodal involvement, the standard of care is complete lymph nodes dissection potentially followed by post-operative RT. Immunotherapy with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies should be offered as first-line systemic treatment in advanced MCC. Chemotherapy can be used when patients fail to respond or are intolerant for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy or clinical trials.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-VI. Primary Cutaneous Cancer, Sarcomas and Neuroendocrine Tumors

PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, therapeutic assessment, restaging and surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications, and guidelines for image interpretation. Tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided. The current, sixth article in this series addresses PET-CT in an evaluation of aggressive cutaneous malignancies, sarcomas and neuroendocrine tumors. A discussion of the role of FDG PET for all types of tumors in these categories is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this article focuses on the most common malignancies in adult patients encountered in clinical practice. It also focuses on Food and Drug Agency (FDA)-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals rather than research tracers or those requiring a local cyclotron. This information will serve as a guide to primary providers for the appropriate role of PET-CT in managing patients with cutaneous malignancies, sarcomas and neuroendocrine tumors. The nuances of PET-CT interpretation as a practical guide for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees, are also addressed.

Molecular imaging phenotyping for selecting and monitoring radioligand therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is an umbrella term that includes a widely heterogeneous disease group including well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), and aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The site of origin of the NENs is linked to the intrinsic tumour biology and is predictive of the disease course. It is understood that NENs demonstrate significant biologic heterogeneity which ultimately translates to widely varying clinical presentations, disease course and prognosis. Thus, significant emphasis is laid on the pre-therapy evaluation of markers that can help predict tumour behavior and dynamically monitors the response during and after treatment. Most well-differentiated NENs express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) which make them appropriate for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). However, the treatment outcomes of PRRT depend heavily on the adequacy of patient selection by molecular imaging phenotyping not only utilizing pre-treatment SSTR PET but ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET to provide insights into the intra- or inter-tumoural heterogeneity of the metastatic disease. Molecular imaging phenotyping may go beyond patient selection and provide useful information during and post-treatment for monitoring of temporal heterogeneity of the disease and dynamically risk-stratify patients. In addition, advances in the understanding of genomic-phenotypic classifications of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas led to an archetypical example in precision medicine by utilizing molecular imaging phenotyping to guide radioligand therapy. Novel non-SSTR based peptide receptors have also been explored diagnostically and therapeutically to overcome the tumour heterogeneity. In this paper, we review the current molecular imaging modalities that are being utilized for the characterization of the NENs with special emphasis on their role in patient selection for radioligand therapy.

Multimodal Strategy in Localized Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Where Are We and Where Are We Heading?

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin whose incidence is rising. Multimodal treatment is crucial in the non-metastatic, potentially curable setting. However, the optimal management of patients with non-metastatic MCC is still unclear. In addition, novel insights into tumor biology and newly developed treatments (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors) that dramatically improved outcomes in the advanced setting are being investigated in earlier stages with promising results. Nevertheless, the combination of new strategies with consolidated ones needs to be clarified. We reviewed available evidence supporting the current treatment recommendations of localized MCC with a focus on potentially ground-breaking future strategies. Advantages and disadvantages of the different treatment modalities, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in the non-metastatic setting, are analyzed, as well as those of different treatment modalities (adjuvant as opposed to neoadjuvant). Lastly, we provide an outlook of remarkable ongoing studies and of promising agents and strategies in the treatment of patients with non-metastatic MCC.

Multidisciplinary team approach for Merkel cell carcinoma: the European Institute of Oncology experience with focus on radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To review the therapeutic strategy in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) treated with radiotherapy (RT) discussed in a multidisciplinary tumour board.

METHODS

Clinical records of patients with a diagnosis of MCC and with an indication to undergo RT at the European Institute of Oncology between 2003 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included in the analysis (median age 65 years, range 42-87). Nineteen received adjuvant RT, 4 exclusive RT, and the remainder palliative RT. Intensity-modulated RT was used in 13 cases, a 3D conformal technique in 11 cases, and stereotactic RT in 2 cases. No major toxicities were recorded. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) after adjuvant RT was 20.5 months, while for unknown primary MCC, it was 23 months. In the adjuvant setting, median polyomavirus-positive RFS was 21.5 months (range 1-49) and median polyomavirus-negative RFS was only 14 months (range 4-45). Overall, RFS of polyomavirus-positive and polyomavirus-negative patients was 10.5 and 8 months, respectively. After adjuvant RT, only 1 out of 10 patients had a recurrence in the RT field. At the time of data collection, 16 patients were alive with no evidence of disease, 1 patient was alive with advanced status of disease, 8 patients died of disease progression, and 1 patient died of other causes.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of unknown primary and polyomavirus-positive cases, which had a better prognosis in our series, may benefit from a multidisciplinary approach, given the limited data available regarding optimal treatment.

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of Merkel cell carcinoma: The experience of 51 studies in our institution

OBJECTIVES

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine tumor with limited evidence on the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the management of MCC.

METHODS

Fifty-one studies of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT of 35 patients (19 men [54.30%]; 72.17±14.63years) with histologic diagnosis of MCC were retrospectively evaluated. The change in tumor staging and the impact on the treatment were analysed.

RESULTS

There were 23 PET/CT positive studies (45.10%) and 28 (54.90%) negative. Thirty four (66.7%) studies were performed for assessment of stage at initial presentation and 17 (33.3%) were performed during the follow up: 6 (35.29%) for suspected recurrence; 7 (41.18%) for restaging; 4 (23.53%) as a part of ongoing surveillance. On the basis of PET/CT results, there was a change in disease stage (SC) in 20 studies (39.20%) and impact in the management (MI) in 28 (54.90%): 11 (32.40%) SC and 12 (35.30%) MI in the initial staging; 5 (71.43%) SC and 7 (100%) MI in the restaging; 3 (50.00%) SC and 6 (100%) MI in suspected recurrence; 1 (25.00%) SC and 3 (75.00%) MI in the surveillance. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT incidentally detected one additional histologically confirmed cancer. The presence of nodal involvement in the beginning (0.0098; HR 3.82; 95%CI: 1.38-10.6), chemotherapy treatment (6e-04; HR 7.06; 95%CI: 2.30-21.60), size of primary tumor >2cm (6e-04; HR 7.06; 95%CI: 2.30-21.60) and positive resection margin (0.00069; HR 4.01; 95%CI: 1.46-11.00) were statistically significant prognostic factors for overall survival. There was a trend towards significance for worse overall survival with initial positive ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT but the trend did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT altered the stage in 2 out of 5 studies and changed the treatment in more than half of the studies performed. The study confirms the important impact of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT on the management of MCC patients.

Positron Emission Tomography in Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine skin malignancy usually arising as a nonspecific nodule on sun-exposed areas of the head and neck. Given the poor prognosis of this aggressive tumor, assessment of disease burden in pre- and post-treatment care may ensure an optimal management with significant implications for patient surveillance and prognosis. Although imaging has established its role in locally advanced or distant metastatic MCC, a standard imaging algorithm is yet to be determined and respective recommendations are mainly based on melanoma. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly evolving as a valuable imaging tool in metastatic or unresectable MCC, mostly utilizing the glucose analogue 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) as a radiotracer. Despite being inferior in detecting the disease in its early stages compared to the "gold standard" of sentinel lymph node biopsy, recent evidence suggests an important role for 18F-FDG PET/CT in the routine workup of localized MCC. Moreover, 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues have been employed as PET tracers in the field of MCC with promising, yet comparable to 18F-FDG, results. This article provides a structured literature review of the most important studies investigating the role of PET or PET/CT in the clinical practice of MCC.

[Personalized medicine in the treatment of periocular tumors : Targeted treatment and use of immune checkpoint inhibitors]

The aim of this article is to provide an overview on the current state of personalized medicine in the systemic treatment of selected periocular tumors, such as basal cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma and conjunctival melanoma. This article therefore provides an extensive current literature review from PubMed including the current guidelines and standard operating procedures (SOP). As 90% of basal cell carcinomas have a pathologic activation of the sonic hedgehog pathway, vismodegib is a new treatment option for inoperable or metastatic basal cell carcinoma and for patients with Gorlin-Goltz syndrome. A novel approach of systemic medicine for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma is immunotherapy using the immune checkpoint inhibitor avelumab. Other personalized immunotherapies, such as the checkpoint inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib and the role of the hedgehog pathway in Merkel cell carcinomas are the subject of current research and will certainly play an important role in future treatment. In the narrow sense personalized medicine has only come true for metastatic conjunctival melanomas: systemic treatment with BRAF, MEK and/or checkpoint inhibitors is initiated only when a BRAF mutation is detected in the tumor or metastatic tissue. Systemic immunotherapy with the checkpoint inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab can also be used as a treatment option in metastatic conjunctival melanomas. In summary, personalized medicine is a subject of current research and provides many new targeted treatment options especially for periocular malignancies; however, it also involves many great challenges in the development and implementation of new techniques and therapies.

Imaging of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: What Imaging Experts Should Know

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine tumor with a higher mortality rate than melanoma. Approximately 40% of MCC patients have nodal or distant metastasis at initial presentation, and one-third of patients will develop distant metastatic disease over their clinical course. Although MCC is rare, its incidence has been steadily increasing. Furthermore, the immunogenicity of MCC and its diagnostic and therapeutic application have made MCC one of the most rapidly developing topics in dermatology and oncology. Owing to the aggressive and complex nature of MCC, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for management of this tumor, including dermatologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis, planning for surgery or radiation therapy, and assessment of treatment response and surveillance. However, MCC is still not well recognized among radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians, likely owing to its rarity. The purpose of this review is to raise awareness of MCC among imaging experts by describing the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features of MCC and current clinical management with a focus on the role of imaging. The authors highlight imaging findings characteristic of MCC, as well as the clinical significance of CT, MRI, sentinel lymph node mapping, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, and other nuclear medicine studies such as bone scintigraphy and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. ^©RSNA, 2019.

High somatostatin receptor expression and efficacy of somatostatin analogues in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive, high-grade, cutaneous neuroendocrine tumour (NET). Agents blocking programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 have efficacy in metastatic MCC (mMCC), but half of patients do not derive durable benefit. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are commonly used to treat low- and moderate-grade NETs that express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs).

OBJECTIVES

To assess SSTR expression and the efficacy of SSAs in mMCC, a high-grade NET. Methods In this retrospective study of 40 patients with mMCC, SSTR expression was assessed radiologically by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS; n = 39) and/or immunohistochemically when feasible (n = 9). Nineteen patients (18 had SRS uptake in MCC tumours) were treated with SSA. Disease control was defined as progression-free survival (PFS) of ≥ 120 days after initiation of SSA.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of 39 patients (85%) had some degree (low 52%, moderate 23%, high 10%) of SRS uptake. Of 19 patients treated with SSA, seven had a response-evaluable target lesion; three of these seven patients (43%) experienced disease control, with a median PFS of 237 days (range 152-358). Twelve of 19 patients did not have a response-evaluable lesion due to antecedent radiation; five of these 12 (42%) experienced disease control (median PFS of 429 days, range 143-1757). The degree of SSTR expression (determined by SRS and/or immunohistochemistry) did not correlate significantly with the efficacy endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to other high-grade NETs, mMCC tumours appear frequently to express SSTRs. SSAs can lead to clinically meaningful disease control with minimal side-effects. Targeting of SSTRs using SSA or other novel approaches should be explored further for mMCC.

New perspectives in Merkel cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a rapidly progressing skin cancer, has poor prognosis. We reviewed the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of MCC, with a focus on recent therapeutic advancements.

RECENT FINDINGS

Risk factors for MCC, such as old age, immunosuppression, polyomavirus infection and exposure to UV radiation have already been identified, but the underlying mechanisms leading to carcinogenesis still need clarification. On the basis of recent advances, immunotherapy - in particular, inhibition targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD1)/PDL1) immune checkpoint blockade - is currently being investigated in the treatment of metastatic MCC. Avelumab, an anti-PDL1 antibody, was the first drug to be approved internationally as second-line monotherapy for patients with advanced MCC, based on results from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 clinical trial. Avelumab has also recently been approved as first-line treatment for advanced MCC in Europe. Pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) in first-line and nivolumab (anti-PD1) in first-line and second-line treatments are two other checkpoint inhibitors that are under investigation, and showing promising results. New innovative therapies are also in development.

SUMMARY

New insights concerning advances in MCC diagnosis and treatment have been highlighted. Immunotherapy for metastatic MCC constitutes a recent breakthrough in an unmet medical need, but alternative therapies should continue to be investigated.

Immune checkpoint blockade for Merkel cell carcinoma: actual findings and unanswered questions

PURPOSE

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma arising from the skin. We aimed to review and deal with some of the most relevant controversial topics on the correct use of immunotherapy for the treatment of MCC.

METHODS

The primary search was carried out via PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (until 31st May, 2018), while other articles and guidelines were retrieved from related papers or those referenced in these papers. Additionally, we performed an extensive search on ClinicalTrials.gov to gather information on the ongoing clinical trials related to this specific topic.

RESULTS

We performed an up-to-date critical review taking into account the results of both retrospective and prospective published studies evaluating these issues: Are there any predictive criteria of response to immunotherapy? What is the correct place of immunotherapy in the treatment algorithm of MCC? What is the best choice after immunotherapy failure? What to do with patients for whom immunotherapy is not been feasible or contraindicated? How long should immunotherapy be prolonged, and what follow-up should be offered after complete response?

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic landscape of MCC is rapidly evolving: many open issues will probably be resolved, and many other questions are likely to arise in the next few years. The results of ongoing prospective clinical trials and of several other studies on these issues are eagerly awaited.