1
|
Mayo ZS, Billena C, Suh JH, Lo SS, Chao ST. The dilemma of radiation necrosis from diagnosis to treatment in the management of brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S56-S65. [PMID: 38437665 PMCID: PMC10911797 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole brain radiation therapy is a mainstay of treatment for patients with brain metastases. The use of SRS in the management of brain metastases is becoming increasingly common and provides excellent local control. Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN) is a late complication of radiation treatment that can be seen months to years following treatment and is often indistinguishable from tumor progression on conventional imaging. In this review article, we explore risk factors associated with the development of radiation necrosis, advanced imaging modalities used to aid in diagnosis, and potential treatment strategies to manage side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Cole Billena
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Husby T, Johannessen K, Berntsen EM, Johansen H, Giskeødegård GF, Karlberg A, Fagerli UM, Eikenes L. 18F-FACBC and 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the evaluation of 3 patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: a pilot study. EJNMMI REPORTS 2024; 8:2. [PMID: 38748286 PMCID: PMC10962628 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-024-00189-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This PET/MRI study compared contrast-enhanced MRI, 18F-FACBC-, and 18F-FDG-PET in the detection of primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) in patients before and after high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy. Three immunocompetent PCNSL patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma received dynamic 18F-FACBC- and 18F-FDG-PET/MRI at baseline and response assessment. Lesion detection was defined by clinical evaluation of contrast enhanced T1 MRI (ce-MRI) and visual PET tracer uptake. SUVs and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) (for 18F-FACBC and 18F-FDG) and time-activity curves (for 18F-FACBC) were assessed. RESULTS At baseline, seven ce-MRI detected lesions were also detected with 18F-FACBC with high SUVs and TBRs (SUVmax:mean, 4.73, TBRmax: mean, 9.32, SUVpeak: mean, 3.21, TBRpeak:mean: 6.30). High TBR values of 18F-FACBC detected lesions were attributed to low SUVbackground. Baseline 18F-FDG detected six lesions with high SUVs (SUVmax: mean, 13.88). In response scans, two lesions were detected with ce-MRI, while only one was detected with 18F-FACBC. The lesion not detected with 18F-FACBC was a small atypical MRI detected lesion, which may indicate no residual disease, as this patient was still in complete remission 12 months after initial diagnosis. No lesions were detected with 18F-FDG in the response scans. CONCLUSIONS 18F-FACBC provided high tumor contrast, outperforming 18F-FDG in lesion detection at both baseline and in response assessment. 18F-FACBC may be a useful supplement to ce-MRI in PCNSL detection and response assessment, but further studies are required to validate these findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered 15th of June 2017 (Identifier: NCT03188354, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03188354 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Husby
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Knut Johannessen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Erik Magnus Berntsen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Håkon Johansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Guro Fanneløb Giskeødegård
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anna Karlberg
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Unn-Merete Fagerli
- Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Live Eikenes
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tom MC, DiFilippo FP, Jones SE, Suh JH, Obuchowski NA, Smile TD, Murphy ES, Yu JS, Barnett GH, Angelov L, Mohammadi AM, Huang SS, Wu G, Johnson S, Peereboom DM, Stevens GHJ, Ahluwalia MS, Chao ST. 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression for brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:647-655. [PMID: 37341842 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04377-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery represents a common diagnostic challenge. We performed a prospective pilot study to determine whether PET/CT with 18F-fluciclovine, a widely available amino acid PET radiotracer, repurposed intracranially, can accurately diagnose equivocal lesions. METHODS Adults with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a follow-up tumor-protocol MRI brain equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT of the brain within 30 days. The reference standard for final diagnosis consisted of clinical follow-up until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation. RESULTS Of 16 patients imaged from 7/2019 to 11/2020, 15 subjects were evaluable with 20 lesions (radiation necrosis, n = 16; tumor progression, n = 4). Higher SUVmax statistically significantly predicted tumor progression (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.011). Lesion SUVmean (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.018), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.813; p = 0.007), and SUVpeak-to-normal-brain (AUC = 0.859; p = 0.002) also predicted tumor progression, whereas SUVmax-to-normal-brain (p = 0.1) and SUVmean-to-normal-brain (p = 0.5) did not. Qualitative visual scores were significant predictors for readers 1 (AUC = 0.750; p < 0.001) and 3 (AUC = 0.781; p = 0.045), but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3). Visual interpretations were significant predictors for reader 1 (AUC = 0.898; p = 0.012) but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3) or 3 (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS In this prospective pilot study of patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a contemporary MRI brain with a lesion equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT repurposed intracranially demonstrated encouraging diagnostic accuracy, supporting the pursuit of larger clinical trials which will be necessary to establish diagnostic criteria and performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Frank P DiFilippo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stephen E Jones
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nancy A Obuchowski
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Steve S Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Guiyun Wu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David M Peereboom
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Glen H J Stevens
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nozaki S, Nakatani Y, Mawatari A, Hume WE, Doi H, Watanabe Y. In vitro evaluation of (S)-2-amino-3-[3-(2- 18F-fluoroethoxy)-4-iodophenyl]-2-methylpropanoic acid ( 18F-FIMP) as a positron emission tomography probe for imaging amino acid transporters. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:36. [PMID: 37115356 PMCID: PMC10147893 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00988-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND (S)-2-amino-3-[3-(2-18F-fluoroethoxy)-4-iodophenyl]-2-methylpropanoic acid (18F-FIMP) as a promising PET probe for imaging the tumor-specific L-type amino acid transporter (LAT) 1. Our previous study revealed that 18F-FIMP had a higher affinity for LAT1 than for LAT2 abundantly expressed even in normal cells. 18F-FIMP showed high accumulation in LAT1-positive tumor tissues and low accumulation in inflamed lesions in tumor-bearing mice. However, the affinity of 18F-FIMP for other amino acid transporters was not determined yet. Here, we aimed to determine whether 18F-FIMP has affinity for other tumor-related amino acid transporters, such as sodium- and chloride-dependent neutral and basic amino acid transporter B(0 +) (ATB0,+), alanine serine cysteine transporter 2 (ASCT2), and cystine/glutamate transporter (xCT). PROCEDURES Cells overexpressing LAT1, ATB0,+, ASCT2, or xCT were established by the transfection of expression vectors for LAT1, ATB0,+, ASCT2, or xCT. Protein expression levels were determined by western blot and immunofluorescent analyses. Transport function was evaluated by a cell-based uptake assay using 18F-FIMP and 14C-labeled amino acids as substrates. RESULTS Intense signals were observed only for expression vector-transfected cells on western blot and immunofluorescent analyses. These signals were strongly reduced by gene-specific small interfering ribonucleic acid treatment. The uptake values for each 14C-labeled substrate were significantly higher in the transfected cells than in the mock-transfected cells and were significantly inhibited by the corresponding specific inhibitors. The 18F-FIMP uptake values were significantly higher in the LAT1- and ATB0,+-overexpressing cells than in the corresponding mock cells, but no such increase was seen in the ASCT2- or xCT-overexpressing cells. These 18F-FIMP uptake values were significantly decreased by the specific inhibitors for LAT1- and ATB0,+. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that 18F-FIMP has affinity not only for LAT1, but also for ATB0,+. Our results may be helpful for understanding the mechanisms of the whole-body distribution and tumor accumulation of 18F-FIMP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Nozaki
- Laboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, 6-7-3 Minatojima-Minamimachiinamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan
- Novel PET Diagnostics Laboratory, RIKEN Innovation Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yuka Nakatani
- Laboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, 6-7-3 Minatojima-Minamimachiinamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan
| | - Aya Mawatari
- Laboratory for Labeling Chemistry, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - William Ewan Hume
- Novel PET Diagnostics Laboratory, RIKEN Innovation Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hisashi Doi
- Laboratory for Labeling Chemistry, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yasuyoshi Watanabe
- Laboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, 6-7-3 Minatojima-Minamimachiinamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matsui JK, Perlow HK, Upadhyay R, McCalla A, Raval RR, Thomas EM, Blakaj DM, Beyer SJ, Palmer JD. Advances in Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:569-586. [PMID: 37182993 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone treatment of brain metastases. With new treatment advances, patients with brain metastases are living longer, and finding solutions for mitigating treatment-related neurotoxicity and improving quality of life is important. Historically, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was widely used but treatment options such as hippocampal sparing WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have emerged as promising alternatives. Herein, we discuss the recent advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases including the sparing of critical structures that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcomes (eg, hippocampus, fornix) that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcome, evidence supporting preoperative and fractionated-SRS, and treatment strategies for managing radiation necrosis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mayo ZS, Halima A, Broughman JR, Smile TD, Tom MC, Murphy ES, Suh JH, Lo SS, Barnett GH, Wu G, Johnson S, Chao ST. Radiation necrosis or tumor progression? A review of the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of cerebral radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:23-31. [PMID: 36633800 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04225-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cerebral radiation necrosis is a complication of radiation therapy that can be seen months to years following radiation treatment. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often difficult and advanced imaging techniques may be needed to make an accurate diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging modalities used in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression following radiation therapy for brain metastases. METHODS We performed a review of the literature addressing the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. RESULTS Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains a diagnostic challenge and advanced imaging modalities are often required to make a definitive diagnosis. If diagnostic uncertainty remains following conventional imaging, a multi-modality diagnostic approach with perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission spectroscopy (SPECT), and radiomics may be used to improve diagnosis. CONCLUSION Several imaging modalities exist to aid in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. Future studies developing advanced imaging techniques are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Ahmed Halima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - James R Broughman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Guiyun Wu
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. .,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diagnostic Value of 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI in Brain Metastases. Clin Nucl Med 2022; 47:1030-1039. [PMID: 36241129 PMCID: PMC9653108 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aims to evaluate whether combined 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI could provide additional diagnostic information compared with MRI alone in brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighteen patients with newly diagnosed or suspected recurrence of brain metastases received dynamic 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI. Lesion detection was evaluated on PET and MRI scans in 2 groups depending on prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS group) or not (no-SRS group). SUVs, time-activity curves, and volumetric analyses of the lesions were performed. RESULTS In the no-SRS group, 29/29 brain lesions were defined as "MRI positive." With PET, 19/29 lesions were detected and had high tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) (D max MR , ≥7 mm; SUV max , 1.2-8.4; TBR, 3.9-25.9), whereas 10/29 lesions were undetected (D max MR , ≤8 mm; SUV max , 0.3-1.2; TBR, 1.0-2.7). In the SRS group, 4/6 lesions were defined as "MRI positive," whereas 2/6 lesions were defined as "MRI negative" indicative of radiation necrosis. All 6 lesions were detected with PET (D max MR , ≥15 mm; SUV max , 1.4-4.2; TBR, 3.6-12.6). PET volumes correlated and were comparable in size with contrast-enhanced MRI volumes but were only partially congruent (mean DSC, 0.66). All time-activity curves had an early peak, followed by a plateau or a decreasing slope. CONCLUSIONS 18 F-FACBC PET demonstrated uptake in brain metastases from cancer of different origins (lung, gastrointestinal tract, breast, thyroid, and malignant melanoma). However, 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI did not improve detection of brain metastases compared with MRI but might detect tumor tissue beyond contrast enhancement on MRI. 18 F-FACBC PET should be further evaluated in recurrent brain metastases.
Collapse
|
8
|
Park C, Buckley ED, Van Swearingen AED, Giles W, Herndon JE, Kirkpatrick JP, Anders CK, Floyd SR. Systemic Therapy Type and Timing Effects on Radiation Necrosis Risk in HER2+ Breast Cancer Brain Metastases Patients Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Front Oncol 2022; 12:854364. [PMID: 35669439 PMCID: PMC9163666 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.854364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a concern that HER2-directed systemic therapies, when administered concurrently with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), may increase the risk of radiation necrosis (RN). This study explores the impact of timing and type of systemic therapies on the development of RN in patients treated with SRS for HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBrM). Methods This was a single-institution, retrospective study including patients >18 years of age with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS between 2013 and 2018 and with at least 12-month post-SRS follow-up. Presence of RN was determined via imaging at one-year post-SRS, with confirmation by biopsy in some patients. Demographics, radiotherapy parameters, and timing (“during” defined as four weeks pre- to four weeks post-SRS) and type of systemic therapy (e.g., chemotherapy, HER2-directed) were evaluated. Results Among 46 patients with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS, 28 (60.9%) developed RN and 18 (39.1%) did not based on imaging criteria. Of the 11 patients who underwent biopsy, 10/10 (100%) who were diagnosed with RN on imaging were confirmed to be RN positive on biopsy and 1/1 (100%) who was not diagnosed with RN was confirmed to be RN negative on biopsy. Age (mean 53.3 vs 50.4 years, respectively), radiotherapy parameters (including total dose, fractionation, CTV and size target volume, all p>0.05), and receipt of any type of systemic therapy during SRS (60.7% vs 55.6%, p=0.97) did not differ between patients who did or did not develop RN. However, there was a trend for patients who developed RN to have received more than one agent of HER2-directed therapy independent of SRS timing compared to those who did not develop RN (75.0% vs 44.4%, p=0.08). Moreover, a significantly higher proportion of those who developed RN received more than one agent of HER2-directed therapy during SRS treatment compared to those who did not develop RN (35.7% vs 5.6%, p=0.047). Conclusions Patients with HER2 BCBrM who receive multiple HER2-directed therapies during SRS for BCBrM may be at higher risk of RN. Collectively, these data suggest that, in the eight-week window around SRS administration, if HER2-directed therapy is medically necessary, it is preferable that patients receive a single agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Park
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Evan D. Buckley
- Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Amanda E. D. Van Swearingen
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Will Giles
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - James E. Herndon
- Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Carey K. Anders
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- *Correspondence: Scott R. Floyd,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pickel TC, Pashikanti G, Voll RJ, Yu W, Zhang Z, Nye JA, Bacsa J, Olson JJ, Liebeskind LS, Goodman MM. Synthesis, Radiolabeling, and Biological Evaluation of the trans-Stereoisomers of 1-Amino-3-(fluoro- 18F)-4-fluorocyclopentane-1-carboxylic Acid as PET Imaging Agents. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci 2021; 4:1195-1203. [PMID: 34151209 DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.1c00062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The enantiomeric non-natural cyclic amino acids (3R,4R)-1-amino-3-fluoro-4-(fluoro-18F)cyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid and (3S,4S)-1-amino-3-fluoro-4-(fluoro-18F)cyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid ([ 18 F]5) have been prepared as a racemic mixture in 1.3% decay corrected radiochemical yield and in greater than 99% radiochemical purity. [ 18 F]5 is transported primarily via system L with some transport occurring via system ASC, as assessed in rat 9L gliosarcoma, human U87 ΔEGFR glioblastoma, and human DU145 androgen-independent prostate carcinoma tumor cells. In rats bearing intracranial 9L gliosarcoma, [ 18 F]5 gave tumor to contralateral brain tissue ratios of up to 2.8. Biodistribution studies in healthy rats demonstrated that bladder accumulation is delayed until 10 min postinjection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas C Pickel
- Department of Chemistry, Emory University, 1515 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.,Medicinal Chemistry, Biotherapeutic and Medicinal Science, Biogen, 225 Binney Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States
| | - Gouthami Pashikanti
- Department of Chemistry, Emory University, 1515 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Ronald J Voll
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.,Center for Systems Imaging, Emory University, 1841 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Weiping Yu
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.,Center for Systems Imaging, Emory University, 1841 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Zhaobin Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Jonathon A Nye
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.,Center for Systems Imaging, Emory University, 1841 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - John Bacsa
- Medicinal Chemistry, Biotherapeutic and Medicinal Science, Biogen, 225 Binney Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States.,Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.,Department of Chemistry, Emory University, 1515 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.,Center for Systems Imaging, Emory University, 1841 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Lanny S Liebeskind
- Department of Chemistry, Emory University, 1515 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Mark M Goodman
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.,Center for Systems Imaging, Emory University, 1841 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| |
Collapse
|