1
|
Malmon S, Elsensohn MH, Thieblemont C, Morschhauser F, Casasnovas O, André M, Gouill SL, Tabaa YA, Durand PB, Bailly C, Edeline V, Vija L, Vercellino L, Ricci R, Kanoun S, Cottereau AS. Prognostic impact of metabolic tumor volume using the SUV4.0 segmentation threshold in 1,960 lymphoma patients from prospective LYSA trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025:10.1007/s00259-025-07176-4. [PMID: 40108044 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07176-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study compared the prognostic value of total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) in lymphoma measured with the recently proposed SUV4.0 segmentation threshold versus the 41% SUVmax across LYSA trials and its impact on intensity and dissemination PET features. METHODS A total of 1960 baseline PET/CT scans of Diffuse Large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients were collected. After a semi-automatic preselection of region of interest, two different segmentation threshold were applied: 41% SUVmax (TMTV41%) and SUV > 4.0 (TMTV4.0). RESULTS The correlation between TMTV4.0 and TMTV41% was ρ = 0.90 for DLBCL, ρ = 0.65 for FL and ρ = 0.60 for HL. For SUVmax, SUVpeak, Dmax and Dbulk features, a strong correlation was observed with ρ > 0.95 whatever the lymphoma subtypes. The predictability of TMTV was high and comparable for the two methods with superimposable confidence intervals for the three subtypes. At the 90th percentile TMTV value, the predicted 7-year PFS was 51.13% with TMTV4.0 vs. 49.7% with TMTV41% for DLBCL patients, 45.5% vs. 39.8% for FL patients, and 82.6% vs. 80.5% for HL patients. A minority of patients showed a predicted PFS deviation > 10% between the two methods: 2.33% in DLBCL, 6.51% in FL and 1% in HL. CONCLUSION TMTV measured with the SUV4.0 threshold provides a comparable PFS prediction than the 41%SUVmax method supporting its routine adoption particularly in the diffuse large B cell lymphoma subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Catherine Thieblemont
- APHP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hemato-Oncology, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Franck Morschhauser
- Department of Hematology, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 7365 - GRITA - Groupe de Recherche Sur les Formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, Lille, F-59000, France
| | | | - Marc André
- Department of Hematology, CHU UCL Namur, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Steven Le Gouill
- Service d'hématologie, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
- Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin (UVSQ), Paris, France
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Inserm/Institut Curie Centre de Recherche, Paris, France
| | - Yassine Al Tabaa
- Scintidoc Nuclear Medicine Center, Clinique Clémentville, Montpellier, France
| | - Paul Bland Durand
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU H. Mondor, U-PEC, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Clement Bailly
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Nantes University Hospital, 1, Place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes, 44000, France
- Nantes Université, Inserm, CNRS, Université d'Angers, CRCI2NA, 8 Quai Moncousu, BP70721, Cedex 1, Nantes, 44007, France
| | - Veronique Edeline
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital La Pitié Salpetrière, Paris, France
| | - Lavinia Vija
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Laetitia Vercellino
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR_S942, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Romain Ricci
- LYSARC, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet Bâtiment 2D, Pierre-Bénite, 69310, France
| | - Salim Kanoun
- Centre de Recherche Clinique de Toulouse, Team 9, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne-Ségolène Cottereau
- Nuclear Medicine Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, 75006, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doma A, Studen A, Jezeršek Novaković B. The Impact of Bone Marrow Involvement on Prognosis in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: An 18F-FDG PET/CT Volumetric Segmentation Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3762. [PMID: 39594717 PMCID: PMC11592337 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16223762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2024] [Revised: 11/01/2024] [Accepted: 11/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assessed the prognostic value of tumor burden in bone marrow (BM) and total disease (TD), as depicted on 18F-FDG PET/CT in 140 DLBCL patients, for complete remission after first-line systemic treatment (iCR) and 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS3 and OS5). METHODS Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of 140 DLBCL patients were segmented to quantify metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and SUVmax in BMI, findings elsewhere (XL), and TD. RESULTS Bone marrow involvement (BMI) presented in 35 (25%) patients. Median follow-up time was 47 months; 79 patients (56%) achieved iCR. iCR was significantly associated with TD MTV, XL MTV, BM PET positivity, and International Prognostic Index (IPI). OS3 was significantly worse with TD MTV, XL MTV, IPI, and age. OS5 was significantly associated with IPI, but not with MTVs and TLGs. Univariate factors predicting OS3 were XL MTV (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.29), BMI SUVmax (HR = 0.56), and IPI (HR = 1.92). By multivariate analysis, higher IPI (HR = 2.26) and BMI SUVmax (HR = 0.91) were significant independent predictors for OS3. BMI SUVmax resulted in a negative coefficient and hence indicated a protective effect. CONCLUSIONS Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT MTV is significantly associated with survival. BMI identified on 18F-FDG PET/CT allows appropriate treatment that may improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrej Doma
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Andrej Studen
- Experimental Particle Physics Department, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Barbara Jezeršek Novaković
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferrández MC, Golla SSV, Eertink JJ, Wiegers SE, Zwezerijnen GJC, Heymans MW, Lugtenburg PJ, Kurch L, Hüttmann A, Hanoun C, Dührsen U, Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Ceriani L, Zucca E, Czibor S, Györke T, Chamuleau MED, Zijlstra JM, Boellaard R. Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction Model Using 5 External PET/CT Datasets of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1802-1807. [PMID: 39362767 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to validate a previously developed deep learning model in 5 independent clinical trials. The predictive performance of this model was compared with the international prognostic index (IPI) and 2 models incorporating radiomic PET/CT features (clinical PET and PET models). Methods: In total, 1,132 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients were included: 296 for training and 836 for external validation. The primary outcome was 2-y time to progression. The deep learning model was trained on maximum-intensity projections from PET/CT scans. The clinical PET model included metabolic tumor volume, maximum distance from the bulkiest lesion to another lesion, SUVpeak, age, and performance status. The PET model included metabolic tumor volume, maximum distance from the bulkiest lesion to another lesion, and SUVpeak Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: The IPI yielded an AUC of 0.60 on all external data. The deep learning model yielded a significantly higher AUC of 0.66 (P < 0.01). For each individual clinical trial, the model was consistently better than IPI. Radiomic model AUCs remained higher for all clinical trials. The deep learning and clinical PET models showed equivalent performance (AUC, 0.69; P > 0.05). The PET model yielded the highest AUC of all models (AUC, 0.71; P < 0.05). Conclusion: The deep learning model predicted outcome in all trials with a higher performance than IPI and better survival curve separation. This model can predict treatment outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma without tumor delineation but at the cost of a lower prognostic performance than with radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Ferrández
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jakoba J Eertink
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne E Wiegers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerben J C Zwezerijnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieternella J Lugtenburg
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lars Kurch
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Nuclear Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Hüttmann
- Department of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christine Hanoun
- Department of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Dührsen
- Department of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sally F Barrington
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, King's Health Partners, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - N George Mikhaeel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's Cancer Centre and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luca Ceriani
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT Centre, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland-EOC, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
- SAKK Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Emanuele Zucca
- SAKK Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland-EOC, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; and
| | - Sándor Czibor
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Györke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Martine E D Chamuleau
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boellaard R, Buvat I, Nioche C, Ceriani L, Cottereau AS, Guerra L, Hicks RJ, Kanoun S, Kobe C, Loft A, Schöder H, Versari A, Voltin CA, Zwezerijnen GJC, Zijlstra JM, Mikhaeel NG, Gallamini A, El-Galaly TC, Hanoun C, Chauvie S, Ricci R, Zucca E, Meignan M, Barrington SF. International Benchmark for Total Metabolic Tumor Volume Measurement in Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT of Lymphoma Patients: A Milestone Toward Clinical Implementation. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1343-1348. [PMID: 39089812 PMCID: PMC11372260 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is prognostic in lymphoma. However, cutoff values for risk stratification vary markedly, according to the tumor delineation method used. We aimed to create a standardized TMTV benchmark dataset allowing TMTV to be tested and applied as a reproducible biomarker. Methods: Sixty baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were identified with a range of disease distributions (20 follicular, 20 Hodgkin, and 20 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). TMTV was measured by 12 nuclear medicine experts, each analyzing 20 cases split across subtypes, with each case processed by 3-4 readers. LIFEx or ACCURATE software was chosen according to reader preference. Analysis was performed stepwise: TMTV1 with automated preselection of lesions using an SUV of at least 4 and a volume of at least 3 cm3 with single-click removal of physiologic uptake; TMTV2 with additional removal of reactive bone marrow and spleen with single clicks; TMTV3 with manual editing to remove other physiologic uptake, if required; and TMTV4 with optional addition of lesions using mouse clicks with an SUV of at least 4 (no volume threshold). Results: The final TMTV (TMTV4) ranged from 8 to 2,288 cm3, showing excellent agreement among all readers in 87% of cases (52/60) with a difference of less than 10% or less than 10 cm3 In 70% of the cases, TMTV4 equaled TMTV1, requiring no additional reader interaction. Differences in the TMTV4 were exclusively related to reader interpretation of lesion inclusion or physiologic high-uptake region removal, not to the choice of software. For 5 cases, large TMTV differences (>25%) were due to disagreement about inclusion of diffuse splenic uptake. Conclusion: The proposed segmentation method enabled highly reproducible TMTV measurements, with minimal reader interaction in 70% of the patients. The inclusion or exclusion of diffuse splenic uptake requires definition of specific criteria according to lymphoma subtype. The publicly available proposed benchmark allows comparison of study results and could serve as a reference to test improvements using other segmentation approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | | | | | - Luca Ceriani
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine and PET-CT Centre, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland; and EOC, Institute of Oncology Research, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Anne-Ségolène Cottereau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cochin Hospital, APHP; and Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Luca Guerra
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Salim Kanoun
- Centre de Recherche Clinique de Toulouse, Team 9, Toulouse, France
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annika Loft
- PET & Cyclotron Unit 3982, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gerben J C Zwezerijnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N George Mikhaeel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's Cancer Centre and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Gallamini
- Research and Innovation Department, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice, France
| | - Tarec C El-Galaly
- Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christine Hanoun
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stephane Chauvie
- Medical Physics Division, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Romain Ricci
- LYSARC, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Emanuele Zucca
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland; and EOC, Institute of Oncology Research, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland; and
| | - Michel Meignan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cochin Hospital, APHP; and Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Sally F Barrington
- King's College London and Guy's and St. Thomas's PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Knaup H, Weindler J, van Heek L, Voltin CA, Fuchs M, Borchmann P, Dietlein M, Kobe C, Roth K. PET/CT Reconstruction and Its Impact on [Measures of] Metabolic Tumor Volume. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:3020-3025. [PMID: 38155023 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES In oncological imaging, the use of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for further prognostic differentiation and the development of risk adapted strategies appears promising. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate ultra-high definition (UHD) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) PET/CT reconstructions for their potential impact on different methods of MTV measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) scans of 40 Hodgkin lymphoma patients before first-line treatment who had undergone fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. The MTVs were determined taking an SUV of 4.0 (MTV4.0) as a fixed threshold or 41% of the single hottest voxel (MTV41%) as an adaptive threshold for automated lymphoma delineation in both UHD and OSEM reconstructions. We then compared the absolute and relative differences between MTV4.0 and MTV41% in UHD and OSEM reconstructions. The relative distribution of MTV4.0 and MTV41% in relation to the reconstruction method applied was recorded and respective differences were tested for statistical significance using the paired sample t-test. RESULTS A comparison of MTV4.0 and MTV41% showed smaller relative and absolute differences in MTV between different reconstruction settings for the MTV4.0 method. Conversely, the absolute as well as the relative differences between MTVs obtained from different reconstructions settings were significantly greater when the MTV41% method was applied (p < 0001). CONCLUSION MTV4.0 brings higher robustness between different reconstruction settings, while with MTV41% the deviation between volumes obtained with different reconstruction settings is greater. For clinical routine and for multicenter settings, the MTV4.0 therefore appears most promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Knaup
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Jasmin Weindler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Lutz van Heek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (M.F., P.B.)
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (M.F., P.B.)
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.).
| | - Katrin Roth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Philip MM, Watts J, Moeini SNM, Musheb M, McKiddie F, Welch A, Nath M. Comparison of semi-automatic and manual segmentation methods for tumor delineation on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) positron emission tomography (PET) images. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:095005. [PMID: 38530298 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad37ea] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective. Accurate and reproducible tumor delineation on positron emission tomography (PET) images is required to validate predictive and prognostic models based on PET radiomic features. Manual segmentation of tumors is time-consuming whereas semi-automatic methods are easily implementable and inexpensive. This study assessed the reliability of semi-automatic segmentation methods over manual segmentation for tumor delineation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) PET images.Approach. We employed manual and six semi-automatic segmentation methods (just enough interaction (JEI), watershed, grow from seeds (GfS), flood filling (FF), 30% SUVmax and 40%SUVmax threshold) using 3D slicer software to extract 128 radiomic features from FDG-PET images of 100 HNSCC patients independently by three operators. We assessed the distributional properties of all features and considered 92 log-transformed features for subsequent analysis. For each paired comparison of a feature, we fitted a separate linear mixed effect model using the method (two levels; manual versus one semi-automatic method) as a fixed effect and the subject and the operator as the random effects. We estimated different statistics-the intraclass correlation coefficient agreement (aICC), limits of agreement (LoA), total deviation index (TDI), coverage probability (CP) and coefficient of individual agreement (CIA)-to evaluate the agreement between the manual and semi-automatic methods.Main results. Accounting for all statistics across 92 features, the JEI method consistently demonstrated acceptable agreement with the manual method, with median values of aICC = 0.86, TDI = 0.94, CP = 0.66, and CIA = 0.91.Significance. This study demonstrated that JEI method is a reliable semi-automatic method for tumor delineation on HNSCC PET images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahima Merin Philip
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Watts
- National Health Service Grampian, Aberdeen AB15 6RE, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mohammed Musheb
- National Health Service Highland, Inverness IV2 3BW, United Kingdom
| | - Fergus McKiddie
- National Health Service Grampian, Aberdeen AB15 6RE, United Kingdom
| | - Andy Welch
- Institute of Education in Healthcare and Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom
| | - Mintu Nath
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Voltin CA, Paccagnella A, Winkelmann M, Heger JM, Casadei B, Beckmann L, Herrmann K, Dekorsy FJ, Kutsch N, Borchmann P, Fanti S, Kunz WG, Subklewe M, Kobe C, Zinzani PL, Stelljes M, Roth KS, Drzezga A, Noppeney R, Rahbar K, Reinhardt HC, von Tresckow B, Seifert R, Albring JC, Blumenberg V, Farolfi A, Flossdorf S, Gödel P, Hanoun C. Multicenter development of a PET-based risk assessment tool for product-specific outcome prediction in large B-cell lymphoma patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1361-1370. [PMID: 38114616 PMCID: PMC10957657 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06554-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The emergence of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fundamentally changed the management of individuals with relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, real-world data have shown divergent outcomes for the approved products. The present study therefore set out to evaluate potential risk factors in a larger cohort. METHODS Our analysis set included 88 patients, treated in four German university hospitals and one Italian center, who had undergone 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) before CAR T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel or axicabtagene ciloleucel. We first determined the predictive value of conventional risk factors, treatment lines, and response to bridging therapy for progression-free survival (PFS) through forward selection based on Cox regression. In a second step, the additive potential of two common PET parameters was assessed. Their optimal dichotomizing thresholds were calculated individually for each CAR T-cell product. RESULTS Extra-nodal involvement emerged as the most relevant of the conventional tumor and patient characteristics. Moreover, we found that inclusion of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) further improves outcome prediction. The hazard ratio for a PFS event was 1.68 per unit increase of our proposed risk score (95% confidence interval [1.20, 2.35], P = 0.003), which comprised both extra-nodal disease and lymphoma burden. While the most suitable MTV cut-off among patients receiving tisagenlecleucel was 11 mL, a markedly higher threshold of 259 mL showed optimal predictive performance in those undergoing axicabtagene ciloleucel treatment. CONCLUSION Our analysis demonstrates that the presence of more than one extra-nodal lesion and higher MTV in LBCL are associated with inferior outcome after CAR T-cell treatment. Based on an assessment tool including these two factors, patients can be assigned to one of three risk groups. Importantly, as shown by our study, metabolic tumor burden might facilitate CAR T-cell product selection and reflect the individual need for bridging therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Andrea Paccagnella
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michael Winkelmann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan-Michel Heger
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Beatrice Casadei
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 'L. e A. Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare (IRCCS) 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna', University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Beckmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
| | - Franziska J Dekorsy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadine Kutsch
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare (IRCCS) 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna', University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Subklewe
- Department of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCCM), University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Laboratory for Translational Cancer Immunology, Gene Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF) Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pier Luigi Zinzani
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 'L. e A. Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare (IRCCS) 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna', University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matthias Stelljes
- Department of Medicine A-Hematology, Oncology, and Pneumology, West German Cancer Center (WTZ) Network Partner Site, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Katrin S Roth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Richard Noppeney
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - H Christian Reinhardt
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jörn C Albring
- Department of Medicine A-Hematology, Oncology, and Pneumology, West German Cancer Center (WTZ) Network Partner Site, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Viktoria Blumenberg
- Department of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCCM), University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Laboratory for Translational Cancer Immunology, Gene Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF) Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare (IRCCS) 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna', University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sarah Flossdorf
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Gödel
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Christine Hanoun
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barrington SF, Cottereau AS, Zijlstra JM. Is 18F-FDG Metabolic Tumor Volume in Lymphoma Really Happening? J Nucl Med 2024; 65:jnumed.123.267022. [PMID: 38388515 PMCID: PMC10995527 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sally F Barrington
- King's College London and Guy's and St. Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom;
| | - Anne-Ségolène Cottereau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France; and
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Heek L, Weindler J, Gorniak C, Kaul H, Müller H, Mettler J, Baues C, Fuchs M, Borchmann P, Ferdinandus J, Dietlein M, Voltin CA, Kobe C, Roth KS. Prognostic value of baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for forecasting chemotherapy outcome in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma: Data from the phase III HD17 trial. Eur J Haematol 2023; 111:881-887. [PMID: 37644732 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The prognostic relevance of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) having recently been demonstrated in patients with early-stage favorable and advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The current study aimed to assess the potential prognostic value of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD17 trial. METHODS 18 F-FDG PET/CT images were available for MTV analysis in 154 cases. We used three different threshold methods (SUV2.5 , SUV4.0 , and SUV41% ) to calculate MTV. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was performed to describe the value of these parameters in predicting an adequate therapy response. Therapy response was evaluated as PET negativity after 2 cycles of eBEACOPP followed by 2 cycles of ABVD. RESULTS All three threshold methods analyzed for MTV showed a positive correlation with the PET response after chemotherapy. Areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.70 (95% CI 0.53-0.87) and 0.65 (0.50-0.80) using the fixed thresholds of SUV4.0 and SUV2.5 , respectively, for MTV- calculation. The calculation of MTV using a relative threshold of SUV41% showed an AUC of 0.63 (0.47-0.79). CONCLUSIONS MTV does have predictive value after chemotherapy in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly when the fixed threshold of SUV4.0 is used for MTV calculation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01356680.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lutz van Heek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jasmin Weindler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Claudia Gorniak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Kaul
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Horst Müller
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jasmin Mettler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiooncology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Justin Ferdinandus
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Katrin S Roth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Luining WI, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN, van Moorselaar RJA, Knol RJJ, Wondergem M, Boellaard R, Cysouw MCF. Optimization and validation of 18F-DCFPyL PET radiomics-based machine learning models in intermediate- to high-risk primary prostate cancer. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293672. [PMID: 37943772 PMCID: PMC10635444 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiomics extracted from prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET modeled with machine learning (ML) may be used for prediction of disease risk. However, validation of previously proposed approaches is lacking. We aimed to optimize and validate ML models based on 18F-DCFPyL-PET radiomics for the prediction of lymph-node involvement (LNI), extracapsular extension (ECE), and postoperative Gleason score (GS) in primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS Patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa who underwent 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT before radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph-node dissection were evaluated. The training dataset included 72 patients, the internal validation dataset 24 patients, and the external validation dataset 27 patients. PSMA-avid intra-prostatic lesions were delineated semi-automatically on PET and 480 radiomics features were extracted. Conventional PET-metrics were derived for comparative analysis. Segmentation, preprocessing, and ML methods were optimized in repeated 5-fold cross-validation (CV) on the training dataset. The trained models were tested on the combined validation dataset. Combat harmonization was applied to external radiomics data. Model performance was assessed using the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC). RESULTS The CV-AUCs in the training dataset were 0.88, 0.79 and 0.84 for LNI, ECE, and GS, respectively. In the combined validation dataset, the ML models could significantly predict GS with an AUC of 0.78 (p<0.05). However, validation AUCs for LNI and ECE prediction were not significant (0.57 and 0.63, respectively). Conventional PET metrics-based models had comparable AUCs for LNI (0.59, p>0.05) and ECE (0.66, p>0.05), but a lower AUC for GS (0.73, p<0.05). In general, Combat harmonization improved external validation AUCs (-0.03 to +0.18). CONCLUSION In internal and external validation, 18F-DCFPyL-PET radiomics-based ML models predicted high postoperative GS but not LNI or ECE in intermediate- to high-risk PCa. Therefore, the clinical benefit seems to be limited. These results underline the need for external and/or multicenter validation of PET radiomics-based ML model analyses to assess their generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wietske I. Luining
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reindert J. A. van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remco J. J. Knol
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits Wondergem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs C. F. Cysouw
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cox MC, Jurcka T, Arens AIJ, van Rijk MC, Kaanders JHAM, van den Bosch S. Quantitative and clinical implications of the EARL2 versus EARL1 [ 18F]FDG PET-CT performance standards in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:91. [PMID: 37878160 PMCID: PMC10600079 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01042-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) guidelines give recommendations for harmonization of [18F]FDG PET-CT image acquisition and reconstruction, aiming to ensure reproducibility of quantitative data between PET scanners. Recent technological advancements in PET-CT imaging resulted in an updated version of the EARL guidelines (EARL2). The aim of this study is to compare quantitative [18F]FDG uptake metrics of the primary tumor and lymph nodes in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) on EARL2 versus EARL1 reconstructed images and to describe clinical implications for nodal staging and treatment. METHODS Forty-nine consecutive patients with HNSCC were included. For all, both EARL1 and EARL2 images were reconstructed from a singular [18F]FDG PET-CT scan. Primary tumors and non-necrotic lymph nodes ≥ 5 mm were delineated on CT-scan. In the quantitative analysis, maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and standardized uptake ratios (SURmax, i.e., SUVmax normalized to cervical spinal cord uptake) were calculated for all lesions on EARL1 and EARL2 reconstructions. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis were compared between EARL1 and EARL2 using different segmentation methods (adaptive threshold; SUV2.5/3.5/4.5; SUR2.5/3.5/4.5; MAX40%/50%). In the qualitative analysis, each lymph node was scored independently by two nuclear medicine physicians on both EARL1 and EARL2 images on different occasions using a 4-point scale. RESULTS There was a significant increase in SUVmax (16.5%) and SURmax (9.6%) of primary tumor and lymph nodes on EARL2 versus EARL1 imaging (p < 0.001). The proportional difference of both SUVmax and SURmax between EARL2 and EARL1 decreased with increasing tumor volume (p < 0.001). Absolute differences in MTVs between both reconstructions were small (< 1.0 cm3), independent of the segmentation method. MTVs decreased on EARL2 using relative threshold methods (adaptive threshold; MAX40%/50%) and increased using static SUV or SUR thresholds. With visual scoring of lymph nodes 38% (11/29) of nodes with score 2 on EARL1 were upstaged to score 3 on EARL2, which resulted in an alteration of nodal stage in 18% (6/33) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Using the EARL2 method for PET image reconstruction resulted in higher SUVmax and SURmax compared to EARL1, with nodal upstaging in a significant number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurice C. Cox
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tijn Jurcka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anne I. J. Arens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje C. van Rijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sven van den Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ferrández MC, Golla SSV, Eertink JJ, de Vries BM, Wiegers SE, Zwezerijnen GJC, Pieplenbosch S, Schilder L, Heymans MW, Zijlstra JM, Boellaard R. Sensitivity of an AI method for [ 18F]FDG PET/CT outcome prediction of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients to image reconstruction protocols. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:88. [PMID: 37758869 PMCID: PMC10533444 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01036-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), applied to baseline [18F]-FDG PET/CT maximum intensity projections (MIPs), show potential for treatment outcome prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The aim of this study is to investigate the robustness of CNN predictions to different image reconstruction protocols. Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT scans were collected from 20 DLBCL patients. EARL1, EARL2 and high-resolution (HR) protocols were applied per scan, generating three images with different image qualities. Image-based transformation was applied by blurring EARL2 and HR images to generate EARL1 compliant images using a Gaussian filter of 5 and 7 mm, respectively. MIPs were generated for each of the reconstructions, before and after image transformation. An in-house developed CNN predicted the probability of tumor progression within 2 years for each MIP. The difference in probabilities per patient was then calculated between both EARL2 and HR with respect to EARL1 (delta probabilities or ΔP). We compared these to the probabilities obtained after aligning the data with ComBat using the difference in median and interquartile range (IQR). RESULTS CNN probabilities were found to be sensitive to different reconstruction protocols (EARL2 ΔP: median = 0.09, interquartile range (IQR) = [0.06, 0.10] and HR ΔP: median = 0.1, IQR = [0.08, 0.16]). Moreover, higher resolution images (EARL2 and HR) led to higher probability values. After image-based and ComBat transformation, an improved agreement of CNN probabilities among reconstructions was found for all patients. This agreement was slightly better after image-based transformation (transformed EARL2 ΔP: median = 0.022, IQR = [0.01, 0.02] and transformed HR ΔP: median = 0.029, IQR = [0.01, 0.03]). CONCLUSION Our CNN-based outcome predictions are affected by the applied reconstruction protocols, yet in a predictable manner. Image-based harmonization is a suitable approach to harmonize CNN predictions across image reconstruction protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Ferrández
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jakoba J Eertink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart M de Vries
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne E Wiegers
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerben J C Zwezerijnen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Pieplenbosch
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Louise Schilder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jin H, Jin M, Lim CH, Choi JY, Kim SJ, Lee KH. Metabolic bulk volume predicts survival in a homogeneous cohort of stage II/III diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients undergoing R-CHOP treatment. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1186311. [PMID: 37384292 PMCID: PMC10293666 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1186311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Accurate risk stratification can improve lymphoma management, but current volumetric 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) indicators require time-consuming segmentation of all lesions in the body. Herein, we investigated the prognostic values of readily obtainable metabolic bulk volume (MBV) and bulky lesion glycolysis (BLG) that measure the single largest lesion. Methods The study subjects were a homogeneous cohort of 242 newly diagnosed stage II or III diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who underwent first-line R-CHOP treatment. Baseline PET/CT was retrospectively analyzed for maximum transverse diameter (MTD), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), MBV, and BLG. Volumes were drawn using 30% SUVmax as threshold. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model assessed the ability to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results During a median follow-up period of 5.4 years (maximum of 12.7 years), events occurred in 85 patients, including progression, relapse, and death (65 deaths occurred at a median of 17.6 months). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an optimal TMTV of 112 cm3, MBV of 88 cm3, TLG of 950, and BLG of 750 for discerning events. Patients with high MBV were more likely to have stage III disease; worse ECOG performance; higher IPI risk score; increased LDH; and high SUVmax, MTD, TMTV, TLG, and BLG. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that high TMTV (p = 0.005 and < 0.001), MBV (both p < 0.001), TLG (p < 0.001 and 0.008), and BLG (p = 0.018 and 0.049) were associated with significantly worse OS and PFS. On Cox multivariate analysis, older age (> 60 years; HR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.58-4.75; p < 0.001) and high MBV (HR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.05-6.54; p = 0.023) were independent predictors of worse OS. Older age (hazard ratio [HR], 2.90; 95% CI, 1.74-4.82; p < 0.001) and high MBV (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.15-6.54; p = 0.032) were also independent predictors of worse PFS. Furthermore, among subjects ≤60 years, high MBV remained the only significant independent predictor of worse OS (HR, 4.269; 95% CI, 1.03-17.76; p = 0.046) and PFS (HR, 6.047; 95% CI, 1.73-21.11; p = 0.005). Among subjects with stage III disease, only greater age (HR, 2.540; 95% CI, 1.22-5.30; p = 0.013) and high MBV (HR, 6.476; 95% CI, 1.20-31.9; p = 0.030) were significantly associated with worse OS, while greater age was the only independent predictor of worse PFS (HR, 6.145; 95% CI, 1.10-4.17; p = 0.024). Conclusions MBV easily obtained from the single largest lesion may provide a clinically useful FDG volumetric prognostic indicator in stage II/III DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jin
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung Jin
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chae Hong Lim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon Young Choi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Jin Kim
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung-Han Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Barrington SF. Advances in positron emission tomography and radiomics. Hematol Oncol 2023; 41 Suppl 1:11-19. [PMID: 37294959 PMCID: PMC10775708 DOI: 10.1002/hon.3137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography is established for staging and response evaluation in lymphoma using visual evaluation and semi-quantitative analysis. Radiomic analysis involving quantitative imaging features at baseline, such as metabolic tumor volume and markers of disease dissemination and changes in the standardized uptake value during treatment are emerging as powerful biomarkers. The combination of radiomic features with clinical risk factors and genomic analysis offers the potential to improve clinical risk prediction. This review discusses the state of current knowledge, progress toward standardization of tumor delineation for radiomic analysis and argues that radiomic features, molecular markers and circulating tumor DNA should be included in clinical trial designs to enable the development of baseline and dynamic risk scores that could further advance the field to facilitate testing of novel treatments and personalized therapy in aggressive lymphomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally F. Barrington
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging SciencesSt Thomas' Campus, Kings College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Keijzer K, Niezink AG, de Boer JW, van Doesum JA, Noordzij W, van Meerten T, van Dijk LV. Semi-automated 18F-FDG PET segmentation methods for tumor volume determination in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients: a literature review, implementation and multi-threshold evaluation. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 21:1102-1114. [PMID: 36789266 PMCID: PMC9900370 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
In the treatment of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), multiple therapeutic options are available. Improving outcome predictions are essential to optimize treatment. The metabolic active tumor volume (MATV) has shown to be a prognostic factor in NHL. It is usually retrieved using semi-automated thresholding methods based on standardized uptake values (SUV), calculated from 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) images. However, there is currently no consensus method for NHL. The aim of this study was to review literature on different segmentation methods used, and to evaluate selected methods by using an in house created software tool. A software tool, MUltiple SUV Threshold (MUST)-segmenter was developed where tumor locations are identified by placing seed-points on the PET images, followed by subsequent region growing. Based on a literature review, 9 SUV thresholding methods were selected and MATVs were extracted. The MUST-segmenter was utilized in a cohort of 68 patients with NHL. Differences in MATVs were assessed with paired t-tests, and correlations and distributions figures. High variability and significant differences between the MATVs based on different segmentation methods (p < 0.05) were observed in the NHL patients. Median MATVs ranged from 35 to 211 cc. No consensus for determining MATV is available based on the literature. Using the MUST-segmenter with 9 selected SUV thresholding methods, we demonstrated a large and significant variation in MATVs. Identifying the most optimal segmentation method for patients with NHL is essential to further improve predictions of toxicity, response, and treatment outcomes, which can be facilitated by the MUST-segmenter.
Collapse
Key Words
- 18F-FDG PET
- AT, adaptive thresholding methods
- CAR, chimeric antigen receptor
- CT, computed tomography
- DICOM, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine
- DLBCL, Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
- EANM, European Association of Nuclear Medicine
- EARL, EANM Research Ltd.
- FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose
- HL, Hodgkin lymphoma
- IMG, robustness across image reconstruction methods
- IQR, interquartile range
- LBCL, Large B-cell lymphoma
- LDH, lactate dehydrogenase
- MAN, clinician based evaluation using manual segmentations
- MATV, Metabolic active tumor volume
- MIP, Maximum Intensity Projection
- MUST, Multiple SUV Thresholding
- Metabolic tumor volume
- NHL, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
- Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
- OBS, robustness across observers
- OS, overall survival
- PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand-1
- PET segmentation
- PET, positron emission tomography
- PFS, progression free survival
- PROG, progression vs non-progression
- PTCL, Peripheral T-cell lymphoma
- PTLD, Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder
- QS, quality scores
- SOFT, robustness across software
- SUV thresholding
- SUV, standardized uptake value
- Segmentation software
- TCL, T-cell lymphoma
- UMCG, University Medical Center Groningen
- VOI, volume of interest
- cc, cubic centimeter
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie Keijzer
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anne G.H. Niezink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke W. de Boer
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap A. van Doesum
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Walter Noordzij
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Tom van Meerten
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lisanne V. van Dijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands,Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|